1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the art of substrate micro-fabrication and, more particularly, to patterning of substrates such as hard disk for hard disk drives.
2. Related Arts
Micro-fabrication of substrates is a well know art employed in, for example, fabrication of semiconductors, flat panel displays, light emitting diodes (LED's), hard disks for hard disk drives (HDD), etc. As is well known, fabrication of semiconductors, flat panel displays and LED's involves various steps for patterning the substrate. On the other hand, traditional fabrication of hard disks, generally referred to as longitudinal recording technology, does not involve patterning. Similarly, fabrication of disks for perpendicular recording technology does not involve patterning. Rather uniform layers are deposited and memory cells are generally defined by the natural occurrence of grains within the unpatterned magnetic layers.
It has been demonstrated that non-patterned disks would fail to satisfy the needs of the market, in terms of area bit density and costs, in order to remain competitive with other forms of storage. Consequently, it has been proposed that next generation disks should be patterned. It is envisioned that the patterning process may utilize photolithography, although currently there is no certainty which lithography technology may be commercialized, and no commercial system is yet available for commercial manufacturing of patterned media. Among contenders for photolithography are interference photolithography, near field lithography and nano-imprint lithography (NIL). Regardless of the lithography technology utilized, once the photoresist is exposed and developed, the disk needs to be etched. However, to date no technology has been proposed for etching a disk in a commercially viable environment.
To be sure, etch technology is well known and well developed for semiconductor, flat panel display, LED's, etc. However, in all of these applications, only one side of the substrate needs to be etched—allowing a chuck to apply force to and hold the substrate from the backside. A plasma is ignited to etch the front side. Additionally, an electrode is generally embedded in the chuck so as to apply an electrical potential to attract the plasma species to impinge on the front surface of the substrate.
In view of the above, a method and system are required to adopt plasma etching technology for etching hard disks to provide patterned media.
The following summary is included in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects and features of the invention. This summary is not an extensive overview of the invention and as such it is not intended to particularly identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented below.
In considering the application of plasma etching technology to hard disks, the subject inventors have recognized that standard plasma etching technology is problematic for etching patterned hard disks. Unlike semiconductors and other applications, the disks need to be etched on both sides. Therefore, conventional systems having plasma etch on only one side are not workable for hard disks. Also, since both sides of the disks are fabricated, no element of the fabrication machine can be allowed to apply clamping force to the disk's surface in order to chuck the disk onto a support. Therefore, prior art systems utilizing conventional chucks cannot be used for processing hard disks, as they apply chucking force to support the disk from its backside. This raises another problem in that, if no chuck can be used to hold the disk, how can a bias potential be applied to cause species of the plasma to impinge on the surface of the disk?
The subject inventors have provided solutions to the above problems and developed etching systems and methods that enable etching of disks in a commercially viable environment. Embodiments of the invention enable plasma etching of both sides of the disks, without applying chucking force to any surface of the disk. Embodiments of the invention also enable applying bias potential to cause the plasma species to impinge the surface of the disk without having the disk attached to a chuck. Plasma is sustained using, e.g., capacitively our inductively coupled RF power, and may be enhanced and/or shaped using magnetic fields.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, exemplify the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain and illustrate principles of the invention. The drawings are intended to illustrate major features of the exemplary embodiments in a diagrammatic manner. The drawings are not intended to depict every feature of actual embodiments nor relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and are not drawn to scale.
According to embodiments of the invention, a system is provided for etching patterned media disks. A movable electrode is utilized to perform sputter etch which is particularly beneficial for sputtering of hard disks used in hard disk drives (HDD). The invention is particularly beneficial for metal etch on a disk of the type commonly referred to as patterned media. The electrode moves to near contact or in slight contact with the substrate so as to couple RF energy to the disk, but no chucking force is applied to the disk. In implementations where the electrode is held at near contact to the disk, the gap between the electrode and the disk should be maintained smaller than the plasma dark space, so as to avoid sustaining plasma between the disk and the electrode. The material to be etched may be metal, e.g., Co/Pt/Cr or similar metals. The substrate is held vertically in a carrier and both sides must be etched. In one embodiment, one side is etched in one chamber and then the second side is etched in the next chamber. An isolation valve is disposed between the two chambers and the disk carrier moves the disks between the chambers. The carrier may be a linear drive carrier, using, e.g., magnetized wheels and linear motors.
In one embodiment the chamber has a showerhead on one side and a movable electrode on the other side. The showerhead may be grounded or biased, and has provisions for delivering gas into the chamber, e.g., argon, reactive gases, such as CxFy, Cl2, Br2, etc. The chamber also has guides or rails for the linear drive disk carrier. When the disk carrier assumes processing position, the electrode is moved close to the disk, and may slightly touching it, but does not apply any chucking forces on the disk, i.e., the disk is maintained in place by the carrier. An RF power, e.g., 13.56 MHz is coupled to the electrode, which is capacitively coupled to the disk. A plasma is then ignited in the void between the disk and the showerhead, to thereby sputter material from the face of the disk. The plasma may be ignited and sustained either by the capacitively coupled RF power, or by a separate inductively coupled RF source. Additionally, the plasma may be enhanced and/or shaped using magnetic fields. In the next chamber, the exact arrangement is provided, except in the opposite facing order, so that the opposing face of the disk is etched. A cooling chamber may be interposed between the two chambers, or after the two chambers.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings.
For illustration purposes, in the example of
In this specific example RF energy coupling is done capacitively from a conductive electrode to the disk and thence to the plasma. The electrode assembly comprises a electrode 544 made of conductive material and shaped to complement the surface of the disk. An electrode cover 543 is provided about the electrode, and extends beyond the electrode 544 so that when the electrode is in its proximal, energized position, the electrode cover 543 covers the edges of the disk. In this position the electrode cover 543 prevents plasma species from attacking the sides of the disk and prevents plasma from reaching the backside surface of the disk, i.e., prevents plasma from accessing the space between the surface facing the electrode and the electrode. Also, the gap between the electrode and the disk should be maintained smaller than the plasma dark space, so as to avoid sustaining plasma between the disk and the electrode.
For non-reactive etch, the process gas may be, for example, argon. Since the magnetic metals generally utilized for magnetic disks may be physically etched, i.e., by sputtering, argon is a suitable process gas. During processing the chamber may be maintained at reduced pressure, e.g., 10-80 millitorr (mT), although certain processes may be performed at pressures of 1 mT to 10 Torr. The RF energy may be set to, e.g., 100-3000 watts, at frequency of, e.g., 13.56 MHz. In the example of
In order to effectively couple the RF energy to the disk, the electrode 544 must be place very close to, or slightly touch the disk. In the embodiments illustrated, the distance between the disk and the electrode may be set to between 0.02″ to 0.75″. In these examples the placement may be done to an accuracy of ±0.005″. In one example, the placement accuracy is enabled by using a proximity sensor, such as, e.g., one or more optical sensors. As shown in
In one example, both the electrode and the showerhead are made of hard anodized aluminum. Notably, unlike conventional etch chambers, here the conductive surface of the electrode is exposed and is not covered with an insulator. In other examples, the showerhead is grounded and is fixed, i.e., not movable. Insulating parts may be made of alumina (where exposure to plasma may occur) or Ultem. With the embodiments as described, etch rates higher than 10 nm per second may be achieved.
As can be understood, while in the embodiment of
Also shown in
It should be understood that processes and techniques described herein are not inherently related to any particular apparatus and may be implemented by any suitable combination of components. Further, various types of general purpose devices may be used in accordance with the teachings described herein. It may also prove advantageous to construct specialized apparatus to perform the method steps described herein. The present invention has been described in relation to particular examples, which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many different combinations of hardware, software, and firmware will be suitable for practicing the present invention. Moreover, other implementations of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. Various aspects and/or components of the described embodiments may be used singly or in any combination in the server arts. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This Application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/052,131, filed May 9, 2008, and from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/992,972, filed Dec. 6, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety. This application also relates to U.S. Application, Publication No. 2009/0145881, and U.S. Application Publication No. 2009/0145879.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3968018 | Lane et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4132624 | King et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4261808 | Walter | Apr 1981 | A |
4351714 | Kuriyama | Sep 1982 | A |
4482419 | Tsukada et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4575408 | Bok | Mar 1986 | A |
4818326 | Liu et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5213658 | Ishida | May 1993 | A |
5244554 | Yamagata et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5286296 | Sato et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296091 | Bartha et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5425611 | Hughes et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5651867 | Kokaku et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5738767 | Coad et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5779803 | Kurono et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5846328 | Aruga et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888594 | David et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5998730 | Shiozaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027618 | Aruga et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6101972 | Bluck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136160 | Hrkut et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183564 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6251232 | Aruga et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268582 | Akita et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334960 | Willson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6417626 | Brcka et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440520 | Baglin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460369 | Hosokawa | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482742 | Chou | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6571729 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6635115 | Fairbairn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6669811 | Hao et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699332 | Piramanayagam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6762766 | Nakayama | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770896 | Schriever | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6872467 | Qian et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6919001 | Fairbairn et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7026098 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027156 | Watts et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041394 | Weller et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7147790 | Wachenschwanz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7314833 | Kamata et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7972470 | Furuta et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8349196 | Fairbairn et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8784622 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020086240 | Petersson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127623 | Minshull et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030136664 | Huff et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030176074 | Paterson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040060518 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096581 | Yashiro et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040129569 | Nabeya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175510 | Hattori et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050170215 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183508 | Sato | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224344 | Iwasaki et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249980 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271819 | Wago et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060102078 | Fairbairn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142890 | Edo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060157201 | Hoffman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175197 | Chistyakov | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236932 | Yokogawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060269796 | Hyodo | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012660 | Lewington et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070209590 | Li | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230055 | Shirotori et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240982 | Tamagaki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070275569 | Moghadam et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080053818 | Ui | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062547 | Bandic et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075979 | Inamura et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083615 | Vukovic et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085362 | Yen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105542 | Purdy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090145879 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145881 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100059476 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20120090992 | Fairbairn et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130098761 | Fairbairn et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101884069 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101889101 | Nov 2010 | CN |
101889325 | Nov 2010 | CN |
103093766 | May 2013 | CN |
0811704 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1727134 | Nov 2006 | EP |
01-173710 | Jul 1989 | JP |
02-185967 | Jul 1990 | JP |
04-080353 | Mar 1992 | JP |
H04-250621 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H05-250665 | Sep 1993 | JP |
08-274142 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09-190899 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2699045 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10-154705 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-016893 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-219520 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-239848 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-260758 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-107229 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-027360 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-124197 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004-178794 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-326831 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-108335 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-509365 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-268934 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006-303309 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-331578 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-012119 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-066475 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-173848 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007-220203 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-272948 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2009-102705 | May 2009 | JP |
2011-507131 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-507133 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-507134 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2013-225370 | Oct 2013 | JP |
5429185 | Dec 2013 | JP |
5464753 | Jan 2014 | JP |
1998-042483 | Aug 1998 | KR |
10-2004-0018988 | Mar 2004 | KR |
10-2006-0089265 | Aug 2006 | KR |
10-2010-0096128 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0099147 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0103493 | Sep 2010 | KR |
422890 | Feb 2001 | TW |
559944 | Nov 2003 | TW |
200416856 | Sep 2004 | TW |
1230742 | Apr 2005 | TW |
2006-00609 | Jan 2006 | TW |
1252259 | Apr 2006 | TW |
200930826 | Jul 2009 | TW |
200937389 | Sep 2009 | TW |
1401331 | Jul 2013 | TW |
I421360 | Jan 2014 | TW |
03081633 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03081633 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004044595 | May 2004 | WO |
2006055236 | May 2006 | WO |
2009073857 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073864 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073865 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US08/85728 dated Feb. 19, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US08/85749 dated Feb. 2, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US08/85750 dated Feb. 2, 2009. |
Yao Fu, “Design of a Hybrid Magnetic and Piezoelectric Polymer Microactuator,” PhD Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia. Published Dec. 2005. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,462, mailed Jan. 30, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,462, mailed Aug. 21, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/338,182, mailed May 24, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447, mailed Aug. 24, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447, mailed Jan. 13, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447, mailed Aug. 15, 2012. |
Examination Report in Singapore Patent Application No. 201003293-6, dated Jan. 16, 2012. |
Examination Report in Singapore Patent Application No. 201003413-0, dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
Written Opinion in Singapore Patent Application No. 201003293-6, mailed May 31, 2011. |
Written Opinion in Singapore Patent Application No. 201003805-7, mailed Jun. 15, 2011. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880118973.8, dated Nov. 9, 2011. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119457.7, dated Dec. 7, 2011. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119425.7, dated Oct. 17, 2011. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119425.7, dated Jul. 4, 2012. |
Zhu, J.G., “New Heights for Hard Disk Drives,” Materials Today, Elsevier, Jul./Aug. 2003, pp. 22-31. |
“Preparation of Hard Disk Drive Magnetic Recording Media for XTEM Analysis,” Application Laboratory Report 11, South Bay Technology Inc., May 2007, 3 pages. |
“Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Technology,” White Paper, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Nov. 2007, 4 pages. |
Bandic, Z. et al., “Patterned Magnetic Media: Impact of Nanoscale Patterning on Hard Disk Drives,” Solid State Technology; accessed from http://www.solid-state.com on Jul. 28, 2008, 4 pages. |
Kanellos, M. “A Divide Over the Future of Hard Drives,” Cnet News, published Aug. 23, 2006, accessed from http://news.cnet.com on Jun. 12, 2008, 3 pages. |
Lammers, D. “MII Tackles Patterned Media Opportunity,” Semiconductor International, accessed from http://www. semiconductor.net on Jun. 12, 2008, 5 pages. |
Sbiaa, R. et al., “Patterned Media Towards Nano-bit Magnetic Recording. Fabrication and Challenges,” Recent Patents on Nanotechnology, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 29-40. |
Examination Report in Singapore Patent Application No. 201003805-7, dated Nov. 9, 2012. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119457.7, dated Sep. 19, 2012. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119457.7, dated Jun. 9, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119457.7, dated Oct. 10, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119425.7, dated Jan. 5, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119425.7, dated Jun. 4, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200880119425.7, dated Dec. 2, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537124, dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537124, dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537124, dated Jun. 11, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537132, dated Jan. 31, 2013. |
Decision of Grant in Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-537132, dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537133, dated Feb. 13, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2010-537133, dated Jul. 2, 2013. |
Decision of Grant in Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-537133, dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Examination Report in Taiwanese Application No. 097147265, dated Oct. 22, 2012. |
Examination Report in Taiwanese Application No. 097147267, dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
Examination Report in Taiwanese Application No. 097147268, dated Jan. 30, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,462 dated Oct. 11, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,462 dated Sep. 6, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/338,182, mailed Dec. 4, 2012. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/338,182, mailed Feb. 19, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,457, mailed Aug. 29, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,457, mailed Mar. 1, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447 dated Feb. 14, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447 dated Sep. 10, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,447 dated Mar. 14, 2014. |
“Conventional Media vs. Patterned Media,” Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, accessed from http://www.hitachigst.com on Jun. 12, 2008, 1 page. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-118321 dated Jul. 15, 2014. (Matter 035241). |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-7012233 dated Sep. 1, 2014. (Matter 035144). |
Notice of Grounds for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-7012232 dated Oct. 8, 2014. (Matter 035044). |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-7012233 dated Mar. 17, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090145752 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61052131 | May 2008 | US | |
60992972 | Dec 2007 | US |