The present invention relates generally to the field of dual-encrypted streams in a communications system and more specifically towards dynamically allocating stream identifier information of a secondary stream in the system.
Cable communications systems typically transmit encrypted data streams according to a single proprietary scheme. Accordingly, cable operators must purchase decryption, or set-top, devices, which reside at the subscriber's premises, that decrypt the data streams according to the proprietary encryption scheme. Obviously, it is to the cable operator's and the subscriber's benefit to be able to source multiple set-tops having different decryption schemes instead of having to choose just a single decryption set-top for the system. In this light, an operator now has an option of installing an overlay system, which allows for multiple encryption schemes and likewise multiple decryption devices that each decrypts one of the encrypted streams.
In an overlay system, however, special precautions should be taken to ensure multiple encrypted transport streams are not in conflict or do not collide. It will be appreciated that in a conventional communications system, there are varying levels of streams that comprise a transport stream. Very generally, a transport stream comprises a plurality of programs where each has a program number. Each of the program streams comprises video, audio, and data elementary streams. Furthermore, each elementary stream comprises video, audio, or data packets. A program number in a program association table (PAT) identifies each program and an associated program map table (PMT). Each PMT then identifies the elementary streams with packet identifiers (PIDs). The program numbers and PIDs are initially chosen out of a well known fixed range of numbers defined in the MPEG specification. Therefore, there exists a chance that two separate transport streams coming from different service providers that are transmitted using the same system, may include common identifiers (e.g., program numbers and PIDs) causing the two streams to overlap, thereby presenting program numbers and/or elementary stream packets that do not have unique identifying stream values, but are intended for two different decryption devices. In this case, a decryption device receives the encrypted stream with packets having different encryption schemes using the same identifier and may try to decrypt the wrong streams, which would then cause several problems. Accordingly, there exists a need to discover, monitor, and dynamically change the identifiers and stream routes in the transport streams in such a system to ensure that conflicts do not arise.
The present invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures, and in which an exemplary embodiment of the invention is shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, the embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The present invention is described more fully hereinbelow.
The present invention is suitable for use in a MPEG transport communications system that transmits multiple streams that use different encryption schemes over one system to receiving devices having multiple decryption schemes. The present invention allows for at least two different decryption devices (e.g., a primary set-top and a secondary set-top) to be located in a single system, which transmits streams having a primary encryption scheme and at least one other encryption scheme (i.e., an overlay, or secondary, encryption scheme). Each set-top is designed to decrypt either the primary or the secondary encryption scheme at one time. Prior to combining the multiple streams and in accordance with the present invention, a processing device analyzes the multiple encrypted streams to discover and monitor the program numbers and packet identifiers of the primary and secondary streams to ensure that any conflicts in the overlay streams and identifiers are corrected prior to transmission. More specifically, if a conflict is detected (i.e., the primary stream and the secondary stream have a same program number and/or packet identifier), the present invention dynamically changes the common identifier(s) in the secondary stream to a different identifier that is unique and does not conflict with any of the associated primary encrypted streams. Accordingly, the multiple streams are transmitted having different program numbers and/or packet identifiers. Additionally, the secondary, or overlay, decryption devices in the system are notified of the changed identifier(s) in the secondary stream to ensure proper processing and subsequent display.
A control system (CS) 140 provides complete management, monitoring, and control of the system's elements and broadcast services provided to users. Specifically in an overlay system, the control system 140 handles the provision and control information between the secondary decryption devices 135 and the overlay encryption device 105. In this manner, the CS 140 controls the output stream program numbers while the encryption device 105 controls all the packet identifiers for the secondary encrypted stream. Accordingly, the CS 140 and the overlay encryption device 105 discover and continuously monitor all program numbers and packet identifiers in the primary encrypted stream, and depending upon any conflicts, the program numbers and packet identifiers for the secondary encrypted stream are dynamically changed to avoid any conflicts in the combined output overlay stream 125.
The primary and secondary PAT sections 315, 325 are combined in the combined overlay output stream 125. The output overlay PAT 305 is shared between the two encryption systems and will contain the entire primary encrypted PAT programs along with the active secondary encrypted programs. The encryption device 105 performs primary encrypted input PID monitoring to dynamically reallocate PID and program number values to avoid any conflicts with the primary encrypted stream 115 in the combined overlay output stream 125. It will be appreciated that the primary encrypted stream PAT section 315 remains untouched and the primary encrypted stream flows without any conflicts between the primary and the secondary encrypted streams.
The updated overlay output PAT 505 having an incremented version number is used to signal the primary and the secondary decryption devices 130, 135 of the changed overlay stream values. Accordingly, the primary decryption devices 130 will correctly tune to program number 0x40 having a PMT PID value of 0x400, and the secondary decryption devices 135 will correctly tune the program stream using the new program number 0x45 having a PMT PID value of 0x200. It will be appreciated that the PMT PID associated with the revised program number 0x45 may not change if the PMT packet identifiers do not conflict with any active encrypted input stream using a PMT PID value of 0x200; therefore, the video and audio elementary packets for program number 0x45 are still located in a PMT using the PID value of 0x200. This is just an example and the algorithm is not limited or required to use the same PMT PID value for the updated stream now using program number 0x45. Additionally, the secondary decryption devices 135 correctly tune to program number 0x60 having an updated PMT PID value of 0x450.
At times, a program number and/or packet identifier in the primary stream may dynamically change and start using new stream PID and/or program number values. For these cases, a monitoring phase continues to monitor the counters 710(1-n) for any updated changes. Accordingly, if a previously unused program number and/or packet identifier is later discovered in the primary encrypted input stream and that new identifier is conflicting with an already assigned identifier in the secondary overlay output stream, the processing device 705 updates the PAT and/or the PMT for the overlay output stream depending upon the stream values that changed. The updated PAT and/or PMT section is then immediately transmitted in the combined overlay output stream 125 to the secondary decryption devices 135 to signal the stream changes. Preferably, the primary encrypted input stream is gated until the updated overlay PAT and/or PMT are transmitted and stream routes are updated to ensure no disruption or conflict prior to the revision. Additionally, it will be appreciated that at some point, the counters 710a-n may become full; at which point, the counters 710a-n may be reset and the monitoring phase continues with identifying the program numbers and packet identifiers in use.
A critical packet selector and mapper 720 selects predetermined critical packets of the clear input stream. The critical packets are then encrypted with the second encryption scheme. The secondary encrypted packets are then mapped having an appropriate PID value in the PMT and/or PAT tables in accordance with the present invention. The tables, the primary and secondary encrypted packets, and the clear packets are subsequently multiplexed by multiplexer 725 to provide a combined overlay stream 730.
It will be appreciated that the processing device 705 of
The continuous PID-monitoring device 805 includes a processor 810 that receives the primary encrypted stream 115. The processor 810 uses a single bit value, which corresponds to 16 bit values that comprise a PID, for each PID and a reset method to determine if any of the 8192 PID streams are active. The PID counters are continuously updated to a set/active state when any PID activity is detected The algorithm reads all the PID bit counters, and then resets all the counters, and enters back into the PID discovery mode. This method will catch the PID activity that fluctuates between active and not active so the PID counter states will not become stale. Using the bit method to indicate and store the PID activity saves memory in comparison to the processing device 705 of
The systems and methods described herein solve any duplicate identifiers by continuously monitoring and subsequently dynamically changing stream identifier values. At times, however, physical routes transporting the steams from the multiple encryption devices 105 may have to be changed in order to ensure that there are no cross stream issues with decryption devices 130, 135 that are currently watching a program. By way of example, assume a secondary decryption device 135 is viewing a baseball game on program number 0x17 with a video PID of 0x50 and an audio PID of 0x51. Due to a PID conflict with an adult channel, which may have just been added to the system, the processing device 705, 805 changes the overlay program number 0x17 that have PIDs 0x500 and 0x501, respectively. If the decryption device 135 doesn't dynamically change its PIDs to the updated PIDs, a cross stream issue will arise and it will begin to decrypt the adult channel having PIDs 0x50 and 0x51. Therefore, it is extremely important that programs are received only by the intended primary and secondary decryption devices 130, 135.
Accordingly, the physical connection between the input and the output of the processing device 705,805 is changed to eliminate a cross stream issue. If the route stays open with the original parameters after the stream changes, this may create the cross strewn issue since the physical connection from the input to the output is not updated. The control of the routes can be in an ASIC, in an FPGA, or code in a processor. The routes are set up to pass the data based on the information in the stream like PID value, User Datagram Protocol (UDP) port value, and Internet Protocol (IP) value. When a specific stream value like an identifier changes, the processing device 705, 805 recognizes the change and updates the route for that stream.
Additionally, a return PID first-in first-out (FIFO) system and method is used to store PID values that are in the process of being deleted and returned to the PID allocation table so that these values are not immediately allocated to any new secondary overlay program that is created. In a preferred embodiment, a 16 bit PID array is used. It will be appreciated, however, that the size can be scaled depending upon the processing device 705, 805 and the application. Each entry in the PID array will hold a PID value to return to the PID allocation table. After the FIFO PID array fills up, the code starts returning the oldest PID value to an unallocated status. The PID values may also be stored in NVM and restored to the PID allocation table and return PID FIFO after powering on the processing device 705, 805. In this manner, cross stream issues are minimized.
It will be appreciated that modifications can be made to the embodiment of the present invention that is still within the scope of the invention. Additionally, the present invention can be implemented using hardware and/or software that are within the scope of one skilled in the art. The embodiments of the description have been presented for clarification purposes; however, the invention is defined by the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/383,373 entitled “System and Method for Dynamically Allocating Stream Identifiers in a Multi-Encryption Transport System” filed May 15, 2006, which issued on Sep. 25, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,275,132 B2, which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/383,373 is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/383,375 also entitled “System and Method for Dynamically Allocating Stream Identifiers in a Multi-Encryption Transport System” filed May 15, 2006, to the same inventors, which issued on Jul. 19, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,983,417 B2, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7124303 | Candelore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127619 | Unger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139398 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146008 | Hannah et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7151831 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155012 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7218738 | Pedlow et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224798 | Pinder et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7287168 | Candelore et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292691 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302059 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310422 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310423 | Hobrock et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319753 | Candelore et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336787 | Unger et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7583701 | Miyazaki et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7917557 | Shteyn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020064189 | Coupe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087502 | Nagy et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087999 | Kashima | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110134 | Gracon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020154636 | Thomas | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194613 | Unger | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196939 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002577 | Pinder | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021412 | Candelore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026423 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046686 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059047 | Iwamura | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081776 | Candelore | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123664 | Pedlow et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156718 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159139 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030212886 | Sugiura | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040062247 | Farla et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068739 | Russ et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136532 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139337 | Pinder et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162855 | Nagy et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181666 | Candelore | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215691 | Van De Ven et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040247122 | Hobrock et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260829 | Husak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050086355 | Deshpande | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102702 | Candelore et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108746 | Futagami et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152548 | Wasilewski | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169468 | Fahrny et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050180568 | Krause | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060115083 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153379 | Candelore et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209906 | Dabrowa | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233369 | Pinder et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245589 | Pinder | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262926 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269060 | Candelore et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070098166 | Candelore et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070286417 | Pinder et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291940 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080095364 | Candelore et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080267400 | Unger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090070355 | Cadarette et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080653 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090147954 | Pinder et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130028417 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11383373 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 13626006 | US |