The present invention relates generally to streaming video such as streaming MPEG video.
Streaming video has been introduced in which video, typically in an MPEG format, is “streamed” in packets from a source such as an Internet site to a receiver such as a user's computer. The video is played as it is being received. Because streaming video networks can experience packet delivery jitter, meaning that the rate at which the packets is received can vary, packets ordinarily are buffered at a receiver until a sufficient number of packets have arrived to permit decoding and playing the packets in a relatively smooth, glitch-free manner.
As recognized herein, this buffering of packets causes an undesirable delay in presentation at the start of the stream, as presentation is held in abeyance until sufficient packets exist in the buffer to more or less ensure a glitch-free, smooth decode and play process. The present invention understands that simply giving a user the option of establishing a relatively low amount of data that must be present in the buffer before presentation commences, while increasing system responsiveness, also increases the risk of glitches during display, since the buffer can empty during play in the presence of network latency relatively sooner than it otherwise would. In other words, allowing a user to make the responsiveness/glitch-free tradeoff, and then maintaining the user-defined buffer amount for all subsequent streaming operations until such time as the user might alter it, leads to less than optimum results. Having made these critical observations, the invention herein is provided.
A streaming video receiver includes a decoder that decodes video packets at a decode rate. A receive buffer in the receiver stores video packets before sending the packets to the decoder. According to the present invention, the receiver executes logic to dynamically establish the decode rate based on an amount of data in the buffer.
In some implementations the decoder may receive the decode rate from a phase-locked loop (PLL). The decoder can be an MPEG decoder. The logic that is executed by the receiver can establish a first decode rate if the amount of data in the buffer does not meet a threshold, and can establish a second decode rate faster than the first decode rate if the amount of data in the buffer meets the threshold. To do this, in some implementations the logic controls the PLL to output the decode rate to the decoder. The first decode rate may be established automatically upon initially receiving the video stream.
In another aspect, a streaming video system includes a receiver buffer storing packets of a video stream, and an MPEG decoder receiving packets from the buffer at a decode rate. The system also includes a PLL that outputs a signal representing the decode rate to the decoder. Specifically, the PLL outputs a signal representative of a first decode rate at or near the beginning of receiving the video stream, with the PLL automatically being altered to output a second decode rate faster than the first decode rate based on an amount of data in the buffer.
In still another aspect, a method for video decoding includes receiving a video stream, and establishing a slow decode rate at the beginning of the stream. Then, the method includes establishing a normal decode rate based on an amount of buffered data.
The details of the present invention, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
The receiver 16 includes a logic mechanism 28 for controlling the clocking mechanism to dynamically establish the decode rate based on the amount of data in the buffer. The logic mechanism can be a processor in the receiver, such as a core processor associated with the decoder 22, although the location and precise nature of the logic mechanism is not limiting beyond the logic it executes. The logic mechanism 28, as the skilled artisan will readily understand, can include a processor proper and memory for storing executable code or circuitry embodying the logic shown in
Now referring to
Block 34 indicates that with the decode rate set to “slow” at the initiation of video stream reception, a video packet (or other unit of video) is received. Recognizing that decoding even at a slow rate cannot proceed until some minimum amount of data has been buffered, at decision diamond 36 it is determined whether this minimum amount, e.g., a few percent of the capacity of the buffer, has been met. It is to be understood that “amount” of data could refer to the size in bits or bytes of buffered data or to the number of packets in the buffer or to other relevant data amount metrics.
If the minimum amount is not met, the logic loops back to block 34, but when the minimum amount is met, decoding (and thus presentation) of the video commences at block 38 at the “slow” decode rate. The logic continues to block 40 to receive another packet in the stream.
At decision diamond 42 another buffer level determination is made, this time to ascertain whether the amount of data in the buffer meets an amount threshold (referred to in
It is to be understood that the shift from the slow decode rate to the normal decode rate may be instantaneous or it may be gradual. For instance, if the difference between the two rates is large, the decode rate can be increased incrementally over a short period. By way of non-limiting example, the operation at block 44 could be executed by incrementally raising the decode rate by ten percent of the increase every few milliseconds until the normal rate is attained.
While for ease of exposition
While the particular SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ESTABLISHING PLL SPEED BASED ON RECEIVE BUFFER DATA ACCUMULATION FOR STREAMING VIDEO as herein shown and described in detail is fully capable of attaining the above-described objects of the invention, it is to be understood that it is the presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and is thus representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention, that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. It is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. Absent express definitions herein, claim terms are to be given all ordinary and accustomed meanings that are not irreconcilable with the present specification and file history.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4231071 | Anderson | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4814726 | Byrd | Mar 1989 | A |
| 5003562 | Van Driest | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5255291 | Holden et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5327430 | Urbansky | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329559 | Wong | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5351274 | Chennakeshu | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5396497 | Veltman | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5473385 | Leske | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5473665 | Hall | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5544324 | Edem et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5566169 | Rangan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5652627 | Allen | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5661778 | Hall | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5754241 | Okada et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5774292 | Georgiou | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5805597 | Edem | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5943490 | Sample | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949795 | Moroney et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960191 | Sample | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6044124 | Monahan | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055270 | Ozkan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6072832 | Katto | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6215789 | Keenan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233226 | Gringeri et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236278 | Olgaard | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6377912 | Sample | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6574242 | Keenan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6577631 | Keenan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6665751 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6694464 | Quayle | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6732068 | Sample et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741109 | Huang | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6765424 | Zampetti | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6876242 | Zampetti | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7373413 | Nguyen et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 20020154640 | Wei | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20040005004 | Demos | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060268912 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |