The present invention relates generally to printing postage indicia on mail pieces and, more particularly, to a partitioned postage evidencing device that can track postage amounts for multiple users.
A postage metering device is a device that can apply indicia of postage amounts to a mail piece, such as an envelope. The indicia serve as proof of postage to the Postal Service. A postage metering device has a set of registers, known as the ascending register and the descending register, that track the postage that has been applied by that meter. When money or value is added to the metering device, it increases the descending register; and when postage is applied or evidenced, an amount of money equal to the postage value is transferred from the descending register to the ascending register. Accordingly, as the descending register decreases, the ascending register increases.
Typical metering devices have a single set of registers, and all of the postage evidenced by a particular meter is tracked by the single set of registers. In environments where a service bureau, such as a letter shop or presort house, provides postage printing to clients, the service bureau owns the meter and is responsible for paying to add postage to the meter. The service bureau prints the postage for clients and is later reimbursed by the clients for the cost of the postage.
One of the issues in the use of a service bureau to process mail in this fashion for a third party client, is that the Postal Service cannot determine who is actually sending the mail. This is because the postage evidence on the envelope is associated with the service bureau, not the sender. Accordingly, the postage identifies the service bureau rather than the person or company that actually mailed the piece.
This creates a problem for the Postal Service in that they cannot identify the actual mailer. Therefore, this mail piece is essentially anonymous to them. This is an issue due to concerns regarding hazardous materials that may need separate treatment in the mail. The Postal Service envisions a system in the future where anonymous mail will go along a slower mail track that will include further checks and decontamination for the mail piece, whereas identified mail will move along a faster path. Approximately 80% of the main mail stream comes from high-speed service bureau environments that would be considered to be anonymous. This would mean that most of the mail stream would have to unnecessarily travel along the slower path.
The present invention is directed to a system and method that allows multiple sets of registers to be used within a single postage evidencing meter or device. A service bureau or user can then associate different sets of registers with different identities or customers. Accordingly, it is possible to use postage applied by a single device to specifically identify several mailers. As a result, the service bureau or user would not require separate pieces of hardware for each mailer.
A postage evidencing device according to embodiments of the present invention can be dynamically partitioned into more than one postage evidencing device. Each device having its own set of registers, and each set of registers being separately registered with the Postal Service. Each set of registers has its own unique identifier, which is printed on the mail piece, and each set of registers has a unique access control to access the device, but all the sets of registers share the same print mechanism.
This allows service bureau customers to track and control how much money is in their set of registers for their mailing. In this manner, customers can control the postage charges. Additionally, the nature of the financial relationship regarding the meter can also be changed such that the actual mailer can put the postage on deposit with the Postal Service rather than requiring the service bureau to carry that financial burden.
Embodiments of the invention include a postage evidencing system for tracking postage amounts for multiple users comprising at least two register set partitions, each of the partitions including a descending register holding a number representing a value of postage that can be evidenced by the device, an ascending register holding a number representing a value of postage that has been previously evidenced by the device, and an identification representing a source of mail pieces that are evidenced with postage from the partition; and a security module that limits access to the partitions and registers.
The postage evidencing system also includes a printer for evidencing postage on mail pieces. The printer and register partitions are incorporated in separate devices, in one embodiment, and are part of the same device, in another embodiment of the invention. Users interact with the system via a display and keypad that provide a user interface to the partitions.
In another embodiment of the invention, a method is disclosed for evidencing postage using a postage evidencing device that tracks postage amounts for multiple users using register set partitions. Each partition includes a descending register representing a value of postage that can be evidenced by the device, an ascending register representing a value of postage that has been previously evidenced by the device, and an identification representing a source of mail pieces that are evidenced with postage from the partition. The method includes identifying existing register set partitions, receiving a partition selection from a user, determining an amount of postage to be evidenced on a mail piece by the device, comparing the amount of postage to be evidenced to the descending register to determine if the selected partition has sufficient postage, and printing postage on the mail piece.
The method also determines whether the postage evidencing device includes existing partitions and, if the postage evidencing device does not include partitions, creates a first partition on the postage evidencing device. Users can also create additional partitions and can select a postage amount that is added to the new partition. Preferably, the partitions are protected and a password or PIN must be entered to modify the registers. When a user purchases additional postage, the descending register is increased by an amount equivalent to an amount of postage purchased.
The value of postage that is printed or evidenced on the mail pieces may be calculated by the postage evidencing device or may be received from another device. In preferred embodiments, the postage is printed on the mail pieces as Information Based Indicia (IBI).
In another embodiment of the invention, a system for bulk processing of mail pieces associated with different sources includes a controller for controlling the operation of components in the system and for tracking the location of mail pieces in the system, a postage evidencing device that tracks postage amounts for multiple users using register set partitions, and a postage application printer for evidencing postage on the mail pieces. Each of the partitions includes a descending register representing a value of postage that can be evidenced by the device, an ascending register representing a value of postage that has been previously evidenced by the device, and an identification representing a source of mail pieces that are evidenced with postage from the partition.
The controller identifies a source of a particular group of mail pieces to the postage evidencing device, and the postage evidencing device selects a partition associated with the source to use when applying postage to that group of mail pieces. The group of mail pieces may be a single mail piece or a plurality of mail pieces. The group of mail pieces may have varying weights, thereby requiring varying postage amounts for each mail piece. In a preferred embodiment, the postage is evidenced on mail pieces as Information Based Indicia (IBI) that includes the identification of a selected partition.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In system 20, security module 201 protects multiple sets (N sets) of registers 202 instead of single set of registers. Device 20 can be configured to include from one to N sets of registers, each set including an ascending register, a descending register and an ID, labeled, for example, as ARN, DRN, and IDN, respectively. Each of these sets of registers is referred to as a partition herein.
Each partition can be assigned to a separate customer and/or job by the service bureau. Separate and independent amounts of postage or value can be assigned to each partition. When a particular job or customer's mail is processed using device 20, the registers for that job or customer's partition are used to track the amount of postage that is applied to the mail pieces. Device 20 allows a single high-speed mail processing system to be used for multiple jobs, wherein a unique identifier is assigned to each job. As a result, the Postal Service can particularly identify the sender of the mail pieces for each job, thereby preventing the mail pieces from being considered anonymous.
Returning to 301, if the postage evidencing device already includes partitions, then the process moves to 303 where the user determines whether he desires to use an existing partition. If the user wants to use a new partition, then the process moves to 307 where the user is prompted to create a new partition. The process then flows to 310 after the new partition is created in the postage evidencing device.
Returning to 303, if the user decides to use an existing partition, then he is prompted to select the desired partition at 304. After selecting the partition, the user is prompted to enter a PIN or password. Decision point 306 determines whether the entered password is correct. If the password is not correct, then the user is taken back to 305 and is prompted to reenter the password. When the correct password is entered and verified at 306, then the process moves to a second start state at 310.
The partition that the user creates or selects at 302, 307 or 304 will be the partition that is used for printing postage for the current run. At start state 310, the user has the option of purchasing initial or additional postage for the selected partition. At 311, the user selects whether to evidence postage. If the user desires to evidence postage, then, at 312, the user enters a postage amount to be evidenced on the mail pieces. Alternatively, at 312, the postage evidencing device calculates the amount of postage that is required for each mail piece.
At 313, the process determines whether sufficient postage value is available. This can be determined, for example, by verifying that the required or requested postage amount is less than the amount available in the descending register for the selected partition. If the available postage is insufficient, then the user is prompted to purchase additional postage at 310. If sufficient postage is available at 313, then the requested or required postage amount is evidenced by printing the postage indicia on the mail piece at 314.
If the user decides not to evidence postage at 311, then the process determines whether the user wants to purchase postage at 315. If the user desires to purchase postage, the process returns to 310 where the user can purchase postage for the selected partition. If the user does not desire to purchase postage at 315, then the session is terminated at 316.
It will be understood by those of skill in the art that the authentication steps at 305 and 306 may be any form of authorization verification now known or later developed and is not limited to the use of a PIN or password. Moreover, in an alternative embodiment, the authentication process and password may be unique for each partition of the postage evidencing device.
Process 30 is particularly useful in the high-speed mail processing environment where a system controller is used to control the printing of postage indicia. In such a system, the controller can select the partition to be used for each job and can enter PIN or identification number to authorize the use of that partition.
When used in a high-speed printing system, the postage amount entered in 312 may be entered directly by the system controller or other device. The postage amount may be the same for an entire run, or may vary depending upon the contents of the individual mail pieces and/or the destination address for the mail pieces.
It will also be understood that the present invention can be used to support multiple sessions simultaneously such that different partitions can perform different tasks at the same time within the device.
Completed mail pieces are stored in catch bin 405. System 400 also includes quality control unit 43 and computer 45, which are coupled to controller 401 and postage computing device 44. Computer 45 includes processor 45-1, database 45-2 and input/output device 45-3. Processor 45-1 may be any device now known or later developed for processing digital information, such as a microprocessor, Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), or the like. Database 45-2 may be any device capable of storing information in a digital format, such as a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Read Only Memory (ROM), a hard drive, a flash memory, a cache memory, or the like. Input/output device
Computer 45 receives work order information for processing various mail pieces. As the work order information is received, computer 45 communicates with controller 401 regarding how to handle each particular mail piece. Using the instructions provided by computer 45, controller 401 directs system 400 to assemble and fold the mail piece in folder 402. The folded mail piece travels down conveyor 41 to inserter 403 where it is inserted into an envelope. Stuffed envelope 42 is transferred down conveyor belt 41 to postage application printer 404. At this point, quality control unit 43 determines if envelope 42 has passed quality checks. For example, quality control unit 43 may ensure that the mail piece was stuffed with the proper number of pages or that the mail piece is of an expected weight. If envelope 42 has passed the quality checks, postage is applied by postage application printer 404.
The printed postage amount is computed in postage computing device 44, which uses information about the individual mail piece from computer 45. System 400 is able to determine the postage due on a piece-by-piece basis. Also, unlike a traditional postage meter, such as meter 404, that can only print a fixed postage amount at any time, postage application printer 404 can print postage for any postal class and for any weight. Accordingly, in system 400, the mail pieces can vary by class and weight and a single production line can be used to process these mail pieces. After the postage is applied by postage application printer 404, the mail piece travels down conveyor belt 41 to catch bin 405 where it is stored in sorted order.
In a preferred embodiment, postage application printer 404 is a high-speed ink jet printer that prints Information-Based Indicia (IBI) on stuffed envelopes 42. Postage application printer 404 may also print other information, such as the destination address. Postage application printer 404 also has the advantage over prior art postage meters of being able to apply the postage in any orientation. Therefore, stuffed envelope 42 can be output from inserter 403 in any orientation. Controller 401 knows the orientation of the envelope as it is produced by inserter 403 and can identify to postage application printer 404 which corner of the envelope is the upper right-hand corner so that the postage is printed in the correct location. In the prior art postage meters, the stuffed envelopes must all be faced and presented in the same orientation so that the meter can stamp the postage in the same area on each envelope, which is typically in the upper right-hand corner.
In one embodiment, computer 45 is a separate device as illustrated in
The postage or IBI applied via postage application printer 404 may be different for each mail piece. In system 400, there is no requirement that all of the mail pieces flowing on conveyor 41 have the same postage or be of the same class. Therefore, it is possible to intersperse different types of mail pieces and even to simultaneously process mail pieces from different companies. Each of the mail pieces is tracked by controller 401 and computer 45 so that system 400 tracks the proper postage for each mail piece as it is processed through the system.
In a preferred embodiment, postage computing device 44 is a postage evidencing device according to the present invention and include the partitions or sets of registers that allow the system to be used for multiple customers or jobs. Controller 401 tracks each mail piece and can identify the sender of each mail piece to postage computing device 44, which then calculates the postage amount. Postage computing device 44 selects the partition for the sender and decreases descending registers and increase the ascending register for that partition. Postage computing device 44 directs postage application printer 404 to print the ID for that partition along with the postage indicia. In alternative embodiments, computer 45 or controller 401 act as the postage evidencing device and include the partitions and sets of registers.
Because a unique postage amount and identifier can be applied to each mail piece, system 400 can continuously operate. For example, in one embodiment, printer 406 is stationed ahead of folder 402. Under the control of computer 45, printer 406 prints the mailing material on blank paper from an external source. Computer 45 directs what should be printed by printer 406 and how those sheets should be combined in folder 402 and inserter 403. Then, the proper postage and other information is applied by printer 404. Using the present invention, system 400 can process different jobs from different customers and each job can be marked with an appropriate identification so that the true sender is not anonymous. Also, this allows the service bureau to more accurately track the postage that is used be each job in real-time.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
The present application is a continuation of co-pending, commonly assigned, patent application Ser. No. 12/273,384 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY PARTITIONING A POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEM,” filed Nov. 18, 2008, which is a continuation of co-pending, commonly assigned, patent application Ser. No. 10/643,745 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY PARTITIONING A POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEM,” filed Aug. 19, 2003, and is related to co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,579 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY PROCESSING MAIL” filed Jun. 26, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1684756 | Close | Sep 1928 | A |
1988908 | MacKinnon | Jan 1935 | A |
2825498 | Alves | Mar 1958 | A |
2887326 | Kramer | May 1959 | A |
3221980 | Mecur | Dec 1965 | A |
3380648 | De Lyra | Apr 1968 | A |
3658239 | Foutz | Apr 1972 | A |
3747837 | Wilson | Jul 1973 | A |
3978457 | Check, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4024380 | Gunn | May 1977 | A |
4245775 | Conn | Jan 1981 | A |
4253158 | McFiggans | Feb 1981 | A |
4271481 | Check, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4306299 | Check, Jr. et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4376299 | Rivest | Mar 1983 | A |
4511793 | Racanelli | Apr 1985 | A |
4565317 | Kranz | Jan 1986 | A |
4629871 | Scribner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641347 | Clark et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649266 | Eckert | Mar 1987 | A |
4661001 | Takai et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4709850 | Wagner | Dec 1987 | A |
4725718 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743747 | Fougere et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757537 | Edelmann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760532 | Sansone et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763271 | Field | Aug 1988 | A |
4775246 | Edelmann et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784317 | Chen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800506 | Axelrod et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802218 | Wright et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812994 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821195 | Baer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831554 | Storace et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831555 | Sansone et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837701 | Sansone et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4853865 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858138 | Talmadge | Aug 1989 | A |
4862386 | Axelrod | Aug 1989 | A |
4864618 | Wright et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868757 | Gil | Sep 1989 | A |
4873645 | Hunter et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4900903 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900904 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900941 | Barton et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4901241 | Schneck | Feb 1990 | A |
4908770 | Breault et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910686 | Change et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919325 | Culver | Apr 1990 | A |
4933849 | Connell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934846 | Gilham | Jun 1990 | A |
4941091 | Breault et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947333 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4993752 | Juszak | Feb 1991 | A |
4998204 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025141 | Bolan | Jun 1991 | A |
5058008 | Schumacher | Oct 1991 | A |
5065000 | Pusic | Nov 1991 | A |
5079714 | Manduley et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085470 | Peach et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091771 | Bolan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5111030 | Brasington et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119306 | Metelits et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136647 | Haber et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142482 | Sansone | Aug 1992 | A |
5150407 | Chan | Sep 1992 | A |
5200903 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202834 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5233657 | Gunther et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237506 | Horbal et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239168 | Dursty, Jr. et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5280531 | Hunter | Jan 1994 | A |
5289540 | Jones | Feb 1994 | A |
5316208 | Petkovsek | May 1994 | A |
5319562 | Whitehouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5323323 | Gilham et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323465 | Avarne | Jun 1994 | A |
5341505 | Whitehouse | Aug 1994 | A |
5375172 | Chrosny | Dec 1994 | A |
5388049 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5423573 | de Passille | Jun 1995 | A |
5437441 | Tuhro et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439721 | Pedroli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454038 | Cordery et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468945 | Huggett et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471925 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476420 | Manning | Dec 1995 | A |
5490077 | Freytag | Feb 1996 | A |
5501393 | Walz | Mar 1996 | A |
5510992 | Kara | Apr 1996 | A |
5573277 | Petkovsek | Nov 1996 | A |
5583779 | Naclerio et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592666 | Perez | Jan 1997 | A |
5598970 | Mudry et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600562 | Guenther | Feb 1997 | A |
5602743 | Fraytag | Feb 1997 | A |
5606507 | Kara | Feb 1997 | A |
5606508 | Thiel | Feb 1997 | A |
5606613 | Lee et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615123 | Davidson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615312 | Kohler | Mar 1997 | A |
5617519 | Herbert | Apr 1997 | A |
5619571 | Sandstrom et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623546 | Hardy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5649118 | Carlisle et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650934 | Manduley | Jul 1997 | A |
5655023 | Cordery et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666284 | Kara | Sep 1997 | A |
5675650 | Cordery et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696829 | Cordery et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699258 | Thiel | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715164 | Liechti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717596 | Bernard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717597 | Kara | Feb 1998 | A |
5726897 | Tammi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742683 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745887 | Gargiulo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774554 | Gilham | Jun 1998 | A |
5774886 | Kara | Jun 1998 | A |
5778076 | Kara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791553 | Fabel | Aug 1998 | A |
5796834 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799290 | Dolan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801364 | Kara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801944 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5805810 | Maxwell | Sep 1998 | A |
5812991 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5819240 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5822739 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5825893 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5860068 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5902439 | Pike et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912682 | Parkos | Jun 1999 | A |
5923406 | Brasington et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923885 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929415 | Berson | Jul 1999 | A |
5930796 | Pierce et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946671 | Herring et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983209 | Kara | Nov 1999 | A |
6005945 | Whitehouse | Dec 1999 | A |
6010156 | Block | Jan 2000 | A |
6026385 | Harvey | Feb 2000 | A |
6061670 | Brand | May 2000 | A |
6073125 | Cordery et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079327 | Sarada | Jun 2000 | A |
6098057 | Dlugos | Aug 2000 | A |
D434438 | Kara | Nov 2000 | S |
6155476 | Fabel | Dec 2000 | A |
6173888 | Fabel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202057 | Pierce | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208980 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209779 | Fabel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233565 | Lewis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6442525 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470327 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6721717 | Kramer | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6820065 | Naclerio | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6865561 | Allport et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6939062 | Ogg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7043053 | Patton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7056410 | Kuller et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069253 | Leon | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7127434 | Burningham | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7249050 | Walker et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7433849 | Cordery et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7774284 | Williams et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8000988 | Bezanson et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8078293 | Campagna et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8150781 | McCall et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8195579 | Kara | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8250000 | Ogg | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8412641 | Zeisset et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8630912 | Seki et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010007086 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016487 | Hiatt, Jr. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032278 | Brown et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037320 | Allport et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020026430 | Ryan | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032668 | Kohler et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040353 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046182 | Bator et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073052 | Katikaneni et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020143714 | Allport et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152127 | Hamilton et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004824 | Joshi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004900 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014376 | DeWitt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030074324 | Kresina et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030140017 | Patton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144972 | Cordery et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193530 | Blackman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040083189 | Leon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089711 | Sandru | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098354 | Manduley | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122776 | Sansone | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122777 | Sansone | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122779 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133438 | Zeisset et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040194154 | Meadors et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220695 | Pintsov | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243523 | Herbert | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258089 | Derechin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267676 | Feng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050075991 | Ogg | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080751 | Burningham | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050137991 | Bruce et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192912 | Bator et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256811 | Pagel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070011023 | Silverbrook | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043839 | Amadio et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070174213 | Whitehouse et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070233754 | Baeuerle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080178162 | Sanford et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228669 | Harris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080298568 | Karandikar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090144230 | Fant | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090241030 | von Eicken et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090319395 | Chandaria | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100269030 | Dugonjic et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100299205 | Erdmann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110071954 | McCall et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0137737 | May 1991 | EP |
0926632 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0927963 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2580844 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2251210 | Jul 1992 | GB |
05-132049 | May 1993 | JP |
09-508220 | Aug 1997 | JP |
02000105845 | Apr 2000 | JP |
04284558 | Jun 2009 | JP |
WO-8801818 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO-199519016 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-9814907 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9814909 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9857302 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9857460 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0927958 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Powell, Edwin, and Campo, John, “Featured product: Mailing machines,” Office Solutions, 17.12, Dec. 2000, Quality Publishing Inc., pp. 42-45. |
“Information-Based Indicia Program (IBIP): Performance Criteria for Information-Based Indicia and Security Architecture for Open IBI Postage Evidencing Systems,” Feb. 23, 2000, The United States Postal Service (USPS), 79 pages. |
Davis Brad L.; “Printing System for Preventing Injustice by Delivering Print Data from Postal Charge Meter to Printer,” Jan. 2001. |
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2007 for JP 515,253/97; with English language translation (4 pages). |
Minnick, Robert, “Postage Imprinting Apparatus and Methods for Use With a Computer Printer”, Apr. 27, 1995, 71 pages. |
Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 515,253/1997, dated Apr. 21, 2009; 5 pages (with English language translation). |
“Service contracts: profit center or necessary evil. (heating and air conditioning maintenance contracts)”, Whitaker, Bert, Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News, v192, n3, p22(2). |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/606,579 to Ogg, filed Jun. 26, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail.”. |
Avery, S., “With New Postage Meters Buyers Can Stamp Out Costs,” Purchasing, 132, 11 Jul. 17, 2003, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12273384 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 15603276 | US | |
Parent | 10643745 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 12273384 | US |