The present invention relates generally to fuel processing systems, and more particularly to a system and method for early detection of impending failure of hydrogen-purifiers used in such fuel processing systems.
Fuel processing systems include a fuel processor, or hydrogen-generating assembly, which produces hydrogen gas, and a fuel cell stack, which produces an electric current and water from the hydrogen gas and air. Because fuel cells are extremely sensitive to certain contaminants, care is taken to prevent the hydrogen feed to the fuel cell stack from containing more then acceptable levels of these contaminants. Therefore there is a need to detect contaminants in the product hydrogen stream from a fuel processor before the contaminated product stream reaches the fuel cell stack.
The present invention provides a system and method for detecting impurities in a hydrogen fuel stream for a fuel cell stack in sufficient time to prevent the impurities from reaching the fuel cell stack. In some embodiments, the hydrogen fuel stream is produced by a fuel processing assembly that is associated with the fuel cell stack. In some embodiments, the system or method are adapted to detect the concentration of a component that itself is not harmful to the fuel cell stack, or which is not harmful in an associated threshold concentration. In some embodiments, the detected composition is at least one of water, methane, and carbon dioxide.
Many other features of the present invention will become manifest to those versed in the art upon making reference to the detailed description which follows and the accompanying sheets of drawings in which preferred embodiments incorporating the principles of this invention are disclosed as illustrative examples only.
A fuel processing system is shown in
Fuel processor 12 is a device or assembly of devices adapted to produce hydrogen gas through any suitable mechanism from a single or multi-component feedstock comprising one or more feed streams. Examples of suitable fuel processors include steam reformers. Examples of suitable mechanisms include steam reforming, partial oxidation, autothermal reforming and pyrolysis of a hydrocarbon or an alcohol, and electrolysis of water. It should be understood that the feedstock for fuel processor 12 will vary depending upon the particular form of fuel processor being used. For example, when fuel processor 12 is a steam reformer, the feedstock will typically include water and an alcohol or hydrocarbon. Autothermal reforming will also include a water component or stream as a part of the feedstock, however, pyrolysis and partial oxidation will not.
For purposes of illustration, the following description will describe fuel processor 12 and its various embodiments generally, since it is within the scope of the present invention that fuel processor 12 may be implemented as any device or series of devices through which hydrogen gas is produced, as well as in the context of a steam reformer.
In
Fuel processor 12 includes a hydrogen-producing region 24, in which hydrogen gas is produced. This initial hydrogen stream 26 typically includes impurities that must be removed before the produced hydrogen gas can be delivered to fuel cell stack 16. In the context of a steam reformer, this region may be referred to as a reforming region, in which the feedstock and water are reacted catalytically to produce a hydrogen stream (or reformate stream) containing hydrogen and byproducts. Byproducts of the reforming reaction include carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
Stream 26 passes to a separation region, or separation assembly, 30 in which hydrogen gas is at least partially purified to produce a product hydrogen stream 34 that contains at least a substantial portion of the hydrogen gas in stream 26. Separation region 30 removes at least a portion of the impurities from stream 26, resulting in product hydrogen stream 34 having a higher concentration of hydrogen gas than stream 26. Region 30 may retain or consume the removed portion of stream 26, or it may exhaust the removed portion as a byproduct stream 36, such as shown in
Sometimes the product stream contains compositions other than hydrogen gas. This may occur, for example, when there is a small leak or other defect in the membrane(s) in the separation region. Therefore, the product stream may also contain some concentrations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. Therefore, it is preferable that fuel processor 12 includes a polishing region that reduces the concentration of compositions that are harmful to fuel cell stack 14 to below acceptable levels. In
For example, region 38 may include one or more methanation catalyst beds 40 that convert carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in the product stream into methane and water according to the following reactions:
CO2+4H2=CH4+2H2O
CO+3H2=CH4+H2O
Because methane and water will not damage fuel cell stack 14, the polished product stream 42 will not impair the operation of stack 14, so long as the concentrations of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are below acceptable minimum levels, as discussed in more detail below.
Sometimes product stream 34 also contains some concentration of unreacted feedstock and water that also pass through separation region 30. Because of this, polishing region 38 may further include a reforming region 44 to convert any unreacted feedstock into hydrogen gas, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. This increases the amount of hydrogen gas produced by the fuel processor, thereby improving the efficiency of the fuel processor. However, it can be understood that the reforming region of purification region 38 should be upstream from the methanation bed(s) so that any carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide produced in the second reforming region may be converted into compositions that will not damage the fuel cell stack.
An example of a suitable steam reforming fuel processor with a polishing region is disclosed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/291,447, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. It should be understood that a second reforming region is not essential to the present invention, and that the polishing region may utilize any other suitable method for removing or reducing the concentration of components that are harmful to fuel cell stack 14. It should also be understood that the present invention may be implemented with fuel processors that lack a polishing region.
Regardless of the specific construction of the fuel processor, the separation region may suffer a failure, namely, a significant loss in hydrogen selectivity. For example, in membrane-based purification regions, this may occur if there is a physical defect in a hydrogen-separation membrane or if a tear or other hole was introduced to the membrane during operation. Should such a failure occur, the concentrations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in the product stream will increase dramatically. Fuel processors including a polishing region will be able to reduce these concentrations to some degree, however, the concentration of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide is likely to exceed the capacity of polishing region 38.
Left unchecked, the product stream passing to the fuel cell stack would contain concentrations of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide that exceed the acceptable minimum levels. Especially of concern is the concentration of carbon monoxide, because a concentration of carbon monoxide as low as a few parts per million may poison, or permanently damage the fuel cell stack. Carbon dioxide is less hazardous to the fuel cell stack, but it is desirable to limit the concentration of carbon dioxide as well, because it will lower the potential in the fuel cell stack, and may be converted to carbon monoxide.
To protect fuel cell stack 14 from being damaged should the product stream contain concentrations of harmful components that are above acceptable threshold levels, system 10 further includes a control system 50 that monitors the composition of the product stream leaving the fuel processor. Control system 50 includes a sensor assembly 52, which includes one or more sensors adapted to detect the concentration of a specific component of the product stream. For example, sensor assembly 52 may include a sensor adapted to detect the concentration of carbon monoxide in the product stream, a sensor to detect the concentration of carbon dioxide, etc. It should be understood that assembly 52 may include one or more sensors adapted to detect the concentration of any selected component or potential impurity in the product stream. Sensor assembly 52 may additionally, or alternatively, measure the composition of the entire product stream.
Sensor assembly 52 communicates via any suitable communication pathway with a controller 54. For example, the sensor may send an electric (i.e. voltage or current) signal to the controller. Other, non-exclusive pathways, include an optical signal, wave form or any other signal that may be received by the controller and readily transduced into a control signal. Controller 54 compares the measured concentrations to acceptable threshold values, such as may be stored in a memory portion 56 of the control system. Preferably, the memory portion includes a nonvolatile component in which the threshold values are stored.
It is within the scope of the present invention that the sensor assembly may not only detect the composition of the product stream, but also compare the measured concentration(s) to corresponding stored value(s). In such an embodiment, the sensor assembly signals the controller when one or more of the threshold concentrations are exceeded.
When any of the threshold concentrations are exceeded, controller 54 automatically isolates the fuel cell stack to prevent the contaminated product stream from reaching the stack. This isolation of the fuel cell stack may be implemented in any suitable way. For example, in
Sensor assembly 52 should measure the concentration of the product stream sufficiently upstream from isolation valve 58 so that there is sufficient time to measure the composition of the stream, determine whether the stream is contaminated above acceptable levels and then isolate the fuel cell stack before the stream is introduced to the stack. Therefore, it is preferable for sensor assembly 52 to analyze the product stream as far upstream from the isolation valve as possible.
With the embodiment of the fuel processing system shown in
When the fuel processor includes a polishing region, such as the fuel processor shown in
It should be understood that not all of the compositions being measured are necessarily harmful to the fuel cell stack. For example, neither methane nor water will damage the fuel cell stack. The concentrations of these compositions may be measured, however, because they are indicative of a failure in the separation region of the fuel processor. Because the polishing region acts as an initial safeguard to remove, within its capacity, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide from the product stream, detecting the products from the polishing region provides advance detection of a failure in the separation region. For example, concentrations of methane or water may be detected that exceed the acceptable threshold levels well in advance of the concentrations of carbon dioxide or carbon monoxide exceeding the determined maximum levels. Because of this, detecting methane or water provides earlier detection of a failure than detecting carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide.
Water provides even earlier detection than methane because it is produced in stoichiometrically greater quantities than methane. Also, detecting water may be preferred because water/humidity sensors are currently less expensive and less prone to interference from other components of the product stream. Of course, as discussed above, it is preferable that the system detect more than one composition to ensure detection before the fuel cell stack is poisoned. It may similarly be desirable for sensor assembly 52 to include redundant sensors for any selected composition in case one of the sensors is damaged or inoperative.
Monitoring carbon dioxide should also enable earlier detection than monitoring carbon monoxide because the relative concentration of carbon dioxide in the product stream will increase before that of carbon monoxide. This is because carbon monoxide is more reactive than carbon dioxide, and therefore will be converted into methane and water in the purification region more readily than carbon dioxide.
It is within the scope of the present invention that control system 50, including sensor assembly 52, may be adapted to detect and isolate the fuel cell stack responsive to concentrations of compositions (elements, compounds, ions, etc.) not discussed herein. So long as a suitable sensor is available to detect the desired composition, controller 54 may store an associated threshold concentration value for that composition and automatically isolate the fuel cell stack should the threshold value be exceeded.
The above-described method for preventing damage of fuel cell stack 14 by early detection of a failure in fuel processor 12 is schematically illustrated at 62 in
In addition to isolating the fuel cell stack, control system 50 may otherwise control the operation of the fuel processing system responsive to the detected failure in the fuel processor. For example, the product stream, now in the form of waste stream 60, should be utilized or otherwise disposed of. For example, the stream may be vented to the atmosphere. However, it may be desirable to utilize stream 60 for other purposes. Because it is no longer suitable for use as a feed for a fuel cell stack 14 does not mean that it is devoid of value. For example, stream 60 may be used as a fuel for a combustion unit to provide heating to fuel processing system 10 or another device. This combustion may occur at the time the fuel cell stack is isolated, or the stream may be stored for future use. It may also be stored for future use other than for use as a fuel for a combustion unit.
Control system 50 may also automatically stop additional feedstock from being delivered to fuel processor 12. Since the actuation of the control system has occurred, thereby signaling a failure within the fuel processor, it follows that there is no need to expend any additional feedstock until the failure is fixed. Because this will typically involve shutting down the fuel processor, the control system may also automatically cause the fuel processor to begin its shut down sequence. Because the fuel cell stack has been isolated, and therefore is no longer receiving a stream of hydrogen from the fuel processor, the load being applied to the fuel cell stack should also be controlled so that the stack's ability to meet the load is not exceeded. Control system 50 may automatically trigger this control of the applied load. In addition to the above safety steps, control system 50 may also actuate a response system, which may include an alarm or other suitable device to alert users that there has been, or imminently may be, a failure within the fuel processor and that the fuel cell stack is no longer receiving a hydrogen stream from the fuel processor.
The above-described steps of the invented method, which may be implemented by the control system, are shown in
Control system 50 may be implemented with either a digital or an analog circuit, or a combination of the two. For example, the controller may include software executing on a processor, or it may be an analog circuit. Regardless of how controller 54 is implemented, it may, but does not necessarily, include a user interface. An example of a user interface is schematically shown in
As shown, interface 80 includes a display region 82 in which information is presented to the user. For example, display region 82 may display the current values measured by sensor assembly 52. As discussed, this may include the entire composition of the product stream, or concentrations of selected components thereof. Other information regarding the operation and performance of the fuel processing system may also be displayed in region 82. Also shown in
User interface 80 may also include a user input device 86 through which a user communicates with the control system. For example, input device 86 may enable a user to adjust the threshold concentration values and/or to select the particular composition or compositions to be detected. Input device 86 may include any suitable device for receiving user inputs, including rotary dials and switches, push-buttons, keypads, keyboards, a mouse, touch screens, etc.
It should be understood that it is within the scope of the present invention that the fuel processing system may include a control system without a user interface, and that it is not required for the user interface to include all of the elements described herein. The elements described above have been schematically illustrated in
While the invention has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. It is intended that any singular terms used herein do not preclude the use of more than one of that element, and that embodiments utilizing more than one of any particular element are within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Applicants regard the subject matter of the invention to include all novel and non-obvious combinations and subcombinations of the various elements, features, functions and/or properties disclosed herein. No single feature, function, element or property of the disclosed embodiments is essential to all embodiments. The following claims define certain combinations and subcombinations that are regarded as novel and non-obvious. Other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether they are broader, narrower or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of applicants' invention.
This application is a continuation patent application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/986,417, which was filed on Nov. 10, 2004, issued on Mar. 7, 2006 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,008,708, and which is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/244,904, which was filed on Sep. 16, 2002, issued on Nov. 16, 2004 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,335, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/477,128, which was filed on Jan. 3, 2000, and issued on Sep. 17, 2002 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,451,464. The complete disclosures of the above-identified patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3469944 | Bocard et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3524819 | Guerrieri | Aug 1970 | A |
3765946 | Werner et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3857735 | Louis et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3884838 | Fleming et al. | May 1975 | A |
3955941 | Houseman et al. | May 1976 | A |
4098959 | Fanciullo | Jul 1978 | A |
4098960 | Gagnon | Jul 1978 | A |
4349613 | Winsel | Sep 1982 | A |
4533607 | Sederquist | Aug 1985 | A |
4642273 | Sasaki | Feb 1987 | A |
4781241 | Misage et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788004 | Pinto et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4820594 | Sugita et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4904455 | Karafian et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4904548 | Tajima | Feb 1990 | A |
5006846 | Granville et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030661 | Lywood | Jul 1991 | A |
5229222 | Tsutsumi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5366818 | Wilinson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366821 | Merritt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5401589 | Palmer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417051 | Ankersmit et al. | May 1995 | A |
RE35002 | Matsubara et al. | Jul 1995 | E |
5432710 | Ishimaru et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458857 | Collins et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5509942 | Dodge | Apr 1996 | A |
5527632 | Gardner | Jun 1996 | A |
5534659 | Springer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5612012 | Soma et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616430 | Aoyama | Apr 1997 | A |
5624768 | Tanokura | Apr 1997 | A |
5631820 | Donnelly et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637414 | Inoue et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5658681 | Sato et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677073 | Kawatsu | Oct 1997 | A |
5712052 | Kawatsu | Jan 1998 | A |
5750076 | Buswell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763113 | Meltser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771476 | Mufford et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780179 | Okamoto | Jul 1998 | A |
5795666 | Johnssen | Aug 1998 | A |
5798186 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5821185 | White et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5861137 | Edlund | Jan 1999 | A |
5897766 | Kawatsu | Apr 1999 | A |
5897970 | Isomura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5929538 | O'Sullivan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932181 | Kim et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964309 | Kimura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985474 | Chen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989739 | Zur Megede et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991670 | Mufford et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997594 | Edlund et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001499 | Grot et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022634 | Ramunni et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042956 | Lenel | Mar 2000 | A |
6045933 | Okamoto | Apr 2000 | A |
6054229 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077620 | Pettit | Jun 2000 | A |
6083637 | Walz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103410 | Fuller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103411 | Matsubayashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120923 | Van Dine et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162267 | Priegnitz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165633 | Negishi | Dec 2000 | A |
6190623 | Sanger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221117 | Edlund et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6855452 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0434562 | Jun 1991 | EP |
1065741 | Jan 2001 | EP |
0 946 406 | Nov 2001 | EP |
0828 303 | Nov 2001 | EP |
4-163860 | Jun 1992 | JP |
WO 9743207 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9743796 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9965097 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0002282 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004600 | Jan 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060154120 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10244904 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10986417 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10986417 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11370012 | US | |
Parent | 09477128 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 10244904 | US |