The present invention generally relates to systems for operating hydraulic circuits. More particularly, this invention relates to a hydraulic system for controlling the position of a working (earthmoving) implement on an earthmoving machine, for example, a blade of an excavator.
Compact excavators are an example of multi-functional earthmoving machines that often have multiple standard functions.
The blade 104 of the excavator 100 and similar earthmoving machines is adapted for moving soil, for example, backfilling a hole or other types of tasks that entail controlling the position of the blade 104 relative to the ground to create a level soil surface, often in spite of changes in machine orientation while driving over uneven ground. In
The cylinders that control the blade position of earthmoving machines can also be directly controlled with a hydraulic pump. Several pump-controlled hydraulic systems are known that use constant and variable displacement pumps. If the blade hydraulic system utilizes a variable displacement pump connected to a single-rod actuator in a closed hydraulic circuit, one or more valves typically connect the circuit to a charge pump and compensate for the difference in volume between the two chambers of the actuator resulting from the presence of the rod within one of the chambers. This volumetric compensation may be achieved with a single spool-type valve (such as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,329,767), two pilot-operated check valves, or another way. The floating function described previously can be accomplished in a pump-controlled actuator circuit with the addition of one or more valves for switching pilot lines. In both valve-controlled and pump-controlled circuits, the actuator floating function is achieved by physically connecting the two actuator hydraulic lines together with one or more valves.
The present invention provides a system and method for performing a floating function in an earthmoving implement of an earthmoving machine without physically connecting chambers within a hydraulic actuator that is adapted to raise and lower the earthmoving implement.
According to a first aspect of the invention, the system includes a device for delivering a pressurized fluid to and receiving pressurized fluid from the actuator and the chambers thereof separated by a piston within the actuator, at least one valve adapted to compensate for differences in volume between chambers of the actuator, and an electronic control circuit comprising electronic sensors for sensing the pressures in the chambers of the actuator, and a controller for receiving outputs of the sensors. The controller calculates an amount of the pressurized fluid that must be delivered to or received from the actuator to achieve substantially constant pressures in the chambers of the actuator, and controls the delivering-receiving device to deliver or receive the amount of the pressurized fluid to achieve the substantially constant pressures in the chambers of the actuator and enable the earthmoving implement to float regardless of motion of the actuator.
According to a second aspect of the invention, the method includes delivering a pressurized fluid to and receiving pressurized fluid from the actuator and the chambers thereof separated by a piston within the actuator, compensating for differences in volume between the chambers of the actuator, and operating an electronic control circuit to sense the pressures in the chambers of the actuator, calculate an amount of the pressurized fluid that must be delivered to or received from the actuator to achieve substantially constant pressures in the chambers of the actuator, and control the delivering-receiving means to deliver or receive the amount of the pressurized fluid to achieve the substantially constant pressures in the chambers of the actuator and enable the earthmoving implement to float regardless of motion of the actuator as the earthmoving machine (14) travels over an uneven surface.
Another aspect of the invention is an earthmoving machine equipped with the system described above.
In view of the above, it can be seen that a significant advantage of this invention is the ability to achieve a desired floating functionality for an implement without additional valves conventionally required to physical connect chambers of the actuators used to raise and lower the implement. An optional advantage is the ability to adjust the floating action, and specifically the contact force between the implement and the soil, by maintaining a non-zero pressure difference within the chambers of the actuator. This capability allows an operator to more precisely control the amount of soil moved by the implement.
Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be better appreciated from the following detailed description.
As represented in
The blade 12 is effectively able to float when the hydraulic pressures within the chambers of the actuator 16 separated by the actuator's piston remain essentially constant, regardless of actuator motion. The system 10 utilizes an electronic control system containing electronic sensors that sense the hydraulic pressures within the actuator 16 and provide an indication of the position (extension/retraction) of the actuator 16. In the embodiment of
Alternate configurations to that of
A particular advantage of the system 10 as described above is the ability to achieve the desired floating functionality without additional valves. Instead, the system 10 can employ pressure and position sensors of the type often installed on machines equipped with a pump-controlled actuator circuits to control actuator position and velocity. In this case, the invention adds functionality at minimal additional cost. Another advantage is the ability to adjust the floating action, and specifically the contact force between the blade 12 and the soil. In the prior art, the contact force between the blade 12 and soil is primarily due to the weight of the blade 12 and cannot be adjusted. With the present invention, the blade contact force can be varied by regulating the actuator flow rates in the manner as described above, but maintaining a non-zero pressure difference across the piston of the actuator 16. This capability allows the operator to more precisely control the amount of soil moved. Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be appreciated from further reference to
While the invention has been described in terms of a specific embodiment, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. For example, the functions of each component of the system could be performed by components of different construction but capable of a similar (though not necessarily equivalent) function. Accordingly, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiment illustrated in the Figures. Instead, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/111,746, filed Nov. 6, 2008, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5138838 | Crosser | Aug 1992 | A |
5329767 | Hewett | Jul 1994 | A |
7430953 | Bitter | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7543449 | Ivantysynova et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7942208 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20060156713 | Kadlicko | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070130928 | Price | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144165 | Kobata et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20100115936 | Williamson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10303360 | Aug 2004 | DE |
2004067969 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zimmerman and Ivantysynova; The Effect of System Pressure Level on the energy Consumption of Displacement Controlled Actuator Systems; Published at Conference in Krakou, Poland, Jul. 2008. |
Williamson, Zimmerman, Ivantysynova; Efficiency Study of an Excavator Hydraulic System Based on Displacement-Controlled Actuators; Published at Conference in Bath, UK, Sep. 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100162885 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61111746 | Nov 2008 | US |