Linear Feedback Shift Registers (LFSRs) are quite common for numerous applications. LFSRs, amongst other things, are used as encoders of BCH codes which are either used for error correction by themselves or as component codes of larger error correction codes.
In many cases, it is required that an LFSR will be generic with programmable taps. For example, if it is required that we have a configurable BCH encoder, we may need to have programmable taps on the LFSR. The following describes an efficient method for constructing a programmable LFSR that can work at higher frequencies and still maintain full generality.
The description of the encoding in
For example, we can set the g_i memory cells to hold the taps corresponding to a BCH code that corrects upto 3 errors, based on GF(2^9) or a BCH code that corrects upto 4 errors and based on GF(2^10). Each case has a different amount of active taps (27 Vs 40). This amount corresponds to the redundancy length. The length of the LFSR (the number of memory cell) will be designed for the longest redundancy case we expect. When shorter redundancies are expected, the first taps g0, g1, . . . will be zero and will have no effect on the feedback. Basically, the first memory cells will only act as a delay line, before a shorter LFSR.
This LFSR can also be defined in a mathematical manner as an operation on a polynomial. We define the plain data by the following polynomial:
Where dk−1 is the first data bit to enter the encoder and d0 is the last bit into the encoder. The power Xi+r at each element represents the corresponding element di position in time. In general, multiplying the polynomial D(x) by x represents a shift in time.
The operation of the LFSR can be represented by a modulo function. A modulo by the taps polynomial defined by
Therefore, the redundancy can be described by the polynomial
We can use the above equation to write a relation between the contents of the LFSR at time k and time k+1 as shown below:
yi(k+1)=yi−1(k)+gi·yv−1(k),i=0 . . . v−1,k≥0
Where yi(j) is the value of memory cell i at time j in the LFSR and y−1(j)=dk−j.
The above equation can be applied recursively to obtain the values of the LFSR after 2, 3 or more shifts.
It is noted this recursive equation can be implemented by an LFSR that may process multiple bits in parallel—e.g. the LFSR content may advance 4 shifts simultaneously at each clock.
The length of the longest branch of the feedback logic increases with the amount of bits that are managed in parallel to each other. The first branch is merely a line from the output port of memory cell 40(N,1). The second branch includes AND gate 51 and XOR gate 52 and has a latency of two gates. The third branch includes two AND gates 51 and two XOR gates 52 and has a latency of four gates. The fourth branch includes three AND gates 51 and three XOR gates 52 and has a latency of six gates.
It is apparent that the more shifts are handled at once, the more logic is needed, and therefore the lower the limit on the clock frequency.
The following describes a method allowing multiplying the LFSR shifts without limiting the clock frequency.
According to an embodiment of the invention there may be provided a method for managing an encoding process, the method may include splitting the first stream of bits to multiple second streams; encoding, in parallel and by using multiple linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs), the multiple second streams to provide third streams, wherein each second stream of the multiple second streams may be encoded using an LFSR of the multiple LFSRs; wherein the encoding may include feeding the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs; merging the third streams to provide a fourth stream; wherein the fourth stream may be stored in the multiple LFSRs; and encoding the fourth stream to provide a fifth stream; wherein the encoding of the fourth stream may include concatenating the multiple LFSRs while bypassing feedback circuits of some of the multiple LFSRs; and shifting the fourth stream through the multiple LFSRs.
The shifting of the fourth stream may include performing multiple (M) shift operations, wherein M may be a positive integer and equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs.
The encoding of the multiple second streams may include performing M/K shift operations, wherein K may be a number of the multiple LFSRs.
The encoding may include performing multiple (Q) zero shifting operation after feeding the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs; wherein Q may be a positive integer, and wherein the shifting of the fourth stream may include performing (M−J) shifting operations, wherein J may be a positive integer and may be responsive to Q and wherein M equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs.
J may equal Q*2.
Q may be selected in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream.
The method may include determining whether to bypass at least one stage of each LFSR in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream.
The merging of the third streams may include concatenating sets of bits, wherein each set of bits may include bits that may be located at a same respective location in each one of the different third streams, wherein an order of the sets of bits corresponds to respective locations of bits of the sets of bits. For example—the first set of bits will include the first bits of the different third streams, the second set of bits (that follows the first set of bits) will include the second bits of the different third streams, the third set of bits (that follows the second set of bits) will include the second bits of the different third streams. In general, the z′th set of bits will include the z′th bits of each one of the third streams and will follow the (z−1)′th set of bits. Index z is an integer that ranges between 1 to the length of a third stream.
The merging of the third streams may be executed during a single clock cycle.
The number of the multiple second streams may be a power of two.
According to an embodiment of the invention there may be provided an encoder for encoding a first stream of bits, the encoder may include multiple linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs); logic, coupled to the multiple LFSRs. The logic may be configured to: split the first stream of bits to multiple second streams; and feed the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs in parallel. The multiple LFSRs may be configured to encode, in parallel, the multiple second streams to provide third streams, wherein each second stream of the multiple second streams may be encoded using an LFSR of the multiple LFSRs. The logic may also be configured to merge the third streams to provide a fourth stream; wherein the fourth stream may be stored in the multiple LFSRs; and concatenate the multiple LFSRs while bypassing feedback circuits of some of the multiple LFSRs. At least one of the multiple LFSRs may be configured to encode the fourth stream to provide a fifth stream. The logic may be configured to shift the fourth stream through the multiple LFSRs during the encoding of the fourth stream.
The encoder may be configured to perform, during the encoding of the fourth stream, multiple (M) shift operations of the fourth stream, wherein M may be a positive integer and equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs.
The encoding of the multiple second streams may include performing M/K shift operations, wherein K may be a number of the multiple LFSRs.
The encoder may be configured to perform multiple (Q) zero shifting operation after feeding the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs; wherein Q may be a positive integer, and wherein a shifting of the fourth stream may include performing (M−J) shifting operations, wherein J may be a positive integer and may be responsive to Q and wherein M equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs.
J may equal Q*2.
Q may be selected in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream.
The encoder may be configured to determine whether to bypass at least one stage of each LFSR in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream.
The encoder may be configured to merge the third streams by concatenating sets of bits, wherein each set of bits may include bits that may be located at a same respective location in each one of the different third streams, wherein an order of the sets of bits corresponds to respective locations of bits of the sets of bits.
The merging of the third streams may be executed during a single clock cycle.
The number of the multiple second streams may be a power of two.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings.
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
Because the illustrated embodiments of the present invention may for the most part, be implemented using electronic components and circuits known to those skilled in the art, details will not be explained in any greater extent than that considered necessary as illustrated above, for the understanding and appreciation of the underlying concepts of the present invention and in order not to obfuscate or distract from the teachings of the present invention.
Any reference in the specification to a method should be applied mutatis mutandis to a system capable of executing the method and should be applied mutatis mutandis to a non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions that once executed by a computer result in the execution of the method.
Any reference in the specification to a system should be applied mutatis mutandis to a method that may be executed by the system and should be applied mutatis mutandis to a non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions that may be executed by the system.
Any reference in the specification to a non-transitory computer readable medium should be applied mutatis mutandis to a system capable of executing the instructions stored in the non-transitory computer readable medium and should be applied mutatis mutandis to method that may be executed by a computer that reads the instructions stored in the non-transitory computer readable medium.
Mathematically, the output codeword obtained from the encoding process can be rewritten as defined as follows: c(x)=xn−kd(x)+Rem[d(x)xn−k]g(x)=u(x)+Rem[u(x)]g(x)
Where (x)=d0+d1x+ . . . +dk−1xk−1, di∈{0,1}, is the input information (in polynomial form, and dk−1 is the first input bit), g(x) is the code generating polynomial, and n is the code length. The redundancy bits of the code are represented by the residue polynomial r(x) which is the result of dividing the (shifted) input bits by the generating polynomial of the cyclic code over GF(2) (e.g., BCH). The Rem[u(x)]g(x) is the same as xn−kd(x) mod g(x) (notation used above) and where u(x)=xn−kd(x).
As described above, the modulo-g(x) operation is implemented using LFSR with the appropriate taps corresponding to the generating polynomial of the code.
We propose to split the first bit stream (first stream) u(x) to second streams, encode each second stream separately (using two LFSR circuits) to provide third streams, then combine the two third streams (by merging these two third streams to a fourth stream and pass the fourth stream through an LFSR) to provide a fifth stream that includes redundancy bits for protecting the first stream.
Clearly, the ability to split the first stream to two second streams (which are handled by two LFSRs) can help to speed-up the encoding process at the expense of additional LFSR, but, without compromising LFSR's clock frequency or generality.
Given first stream u(x)=d(x)xn−k, where ui ∈{0,1}:
In general, higher parallelism can be obtained by dividing the first stream into any power of 2 second streams and performing similar calculation to those above.
As explained above, the configurable multi-bit stream LFSR should support any combination of taps (that correspond to the code's generating polynomial). There are few ways to implement an LFSR circuitry. Here we demonstrate a Galois implementation (a.k.a one-to-many LFSR), other implementation face the same problem of meeting “long feedback logic” timing constraints when increasing the clock frequency.
From this point on, let us assume we want to widen the incoming data bus from 16 bits to 32 bits, but timing closure does not meet the setup requirements. We also assume (for simplicity that the incoming data is 32 bits aligned) and the LFSR length (degree of the generating polynomial) is aligned to 16 bits.
The implementation assumes we have a LFSR (of 16 parallel bits) with 10 stages (overall supported polynomial degree is 160) that does meet timing requirements. This LFSR has configurable tap option for each register cell, a “Din switch” that selects the incoming data source and a “Feedback switch” (see switches A, B in
As explained before, we want to calculate:
Rem[d(x)xn−k]g(x)=
Rem[de2(x)xn−k+xd02(x)(x)xn−k]g(x)=
Rem[re2(x)xn−k+xro2(x)(x)xn−k]g(x)
For that purpose we first calculate third streams re(x) and ro(x). Which are the residues of the second streams calculated in separated Even/Odd LFSRs respectively.
The encoding process starts by splitting the first stream to two second streams and feeding the second streams to the first and second LFSRs 110 and 120—that are also denoted even LFSR 110 and odd LFSR 120.
The first stream is split (by switch 102 of logic 140) to two second streams—an even second stream 104 and an odd second stream 105 that receive the even and odd bits of the first bits stream respectively. The even LFSR 110 receives the even second stream and the odd LFSR 120 receives the odd second stream.
The feeding step includes a first feeding phase that ends when the last (rightmost) memory cells of each LFSR 110 and 120 receive the first bits of the second streams. Till then the feedback generated by the feedback circuits 111 and 121 is meaningless. Till the end of the first feeding phase the input switches A of both LFSRs are set to their din receiving state—in which they allow bits of the second streams to enter the LFSRs.
The first feeding phase is followed by an encoding phase during which the odd and even second streams are encoded. This includes shifting the second streams through the odd and even LFSRs while receiving valid feedback. The encoding ends and a generation of the third streams is completed—when bits responsive to the last bits of each one of the odd and even second streams reaches the last memory cells of each LFSR.
At the end of the encoding phase the even LFSR 110 stores re(x) and the Odd LFSR 120 stores ro(x).
This step takes
This is followed by merging the two third streams to a fourth stream. The merging includes creating a fourth stream in which the bits of the two third streams are threaded together.
The merging may include concatenating sets of bits, wherein each set of bits may include bits that may be located at a same respective location in each one of the different third streams, wherein an order of the sets of bits corresponds to respective locations of bits of the sets of bits
For example—the first set of bits will include the first bits of the different third streams, the second set of bits (that follows the first set of bits) will include the second bits of the different third streams, the third set of bits (that follows the second set of bits) will include the second bits of the different third streams. In general, the z′th set of bits will include the z′th bits of each one of the third streams and will follow the (z−1)′th set of bits. Index z is an integer that ranges between 1 to L, L being the length of a third stream.
An example of the merging may include defining each second stream LFSR bit index within the range {0 . . . L−1) wherein L is a length of each LFSR, defining the LFSR index within the range {0 . . . N−1} wherein N is the number of second stream parallel LFSRs. The merging may include turning the x′th bit of the y′th LFSR to become the (N*x+y)′th bit of the fourth stream.
To demonstrate on
The merging may be executed during a single clock cycle. Each memory cell receives the content of another memory cell in order to facilitate the merge operation.
The bits are merged in a bit interleaving manner. For example, bit 143 (shown in the
The merging may take a single clock cycle (tMERGE).
After this step is done the LFSRs holds the value: R(x)=rE2(x)+xro2(x)
The logic subset 30′(1) of
Logic subset 30′(1) includes a multiplexer 131 that may provide (via logic 140) the content (merge_in 152) of 120(a,b) or a content that is affected (by logic subset 30(1)) by feedback 153 and content (prev_stage_output) of the previous memory cell 110(0,1). The multiplexer 131 is controlled by a merge_step control signal 151 that selects merge_in 152 during merge operations.
The logic cells of first stage (leftmost) of the even LFSR 110 will be coupled to a more complex logic subset than 30′(1)—
Now we want to calculate the residue Rem[R(x)xn−k]g(x).
At this stage the fourth stream is stored in even and odd LFSRs 110 and 120.
The following stage (termed additional encoding) includes encoding the fourth stream to provide a fifth stream.
The encoding of the fourth stream includes concatenating the multiple LFSRs (to form a virtual single LFSR) while bypassing feedback circuits of some of the multiple LFSRs. In
The Odd LFSR 120 shifts zeros in and the Even LFSR 110 is driven by the Odd LFSR 120 output while calculating the fifth stream.
This step ends when the last bit of the first fourth stream R(x) enters the Even LFSR 110.
This step takes
At the end of this step the Even LFSR holds the value: Rem[R(x)]g(x) and the odd LFSR stores only zeroes—as illustrated in (
If we want to complete the calculation and get: [R(x)xn−k]g(x), we need to shift in |rE(x)|=|g(x)|=n−k additional zero cycles.
By the end of the previous stage the Odd LFSR is loaded with zero.
In this step the LFSRs switches stays as in “Additional Encoding” step.
Pushing n−k additional zero cycles into it does not change the Odd LFSR state, but lets the Even LFSR roll n−k cycles whilst getting the desired result:
Rem[R(x)xn−k]g(x)
This step also consumes
Zero Shifting time reduction
The overall calculation time of the suggested basic solution time is:
Any additive time besides tENCODE is an overhead. This section deals with saving some of the tZEROS time.
We can mathematically state that:
Let's define (1):
We can get {tilde over (r)}e (x) by shifting re(x) we got after “Din step” by
That is
By that we enlarge “Din step” by
but skip “Zeros step” of
Overall
spared.
Not Aligned Merged LFSRs Outcome
We assume here the payload data is aligned to 32 bits (each cycle the input bus drives all bits), so calculating re(x) and ro(x) is easy. However {tilde over (r)}e(x) and {tilde over (r)}o(x) are calculated on a payload that is not 32 bits aligned. Moreover, supporting any LFSR length (any generating polynomial degree) means the “Additional Encoding step” data in i.e. the merged {tilde over (R)}(x)={tilde over (r)}E2(x)+x{tilde over (r)}02(x) is not necessarily aligned to 16 bits. The concatenated LFSR input bus is of 16 bits, so apparently driving in the exact required data is an obstacle.
Having an LFSR length of n−k, we can define the 16 bits aligned register chain length REGCH=n−k+t where Rem[REGCH]16=0.
Previously it has been shown that zero input shifting by X bits in “ENCODE step” is equal to 2× zero input shifted bits in the “ADDITIONAL_ENCODE step”. The following procedure describes how maneuvering the zero shifting between the steps results in the desired outcome when the LFSR is of any length.
The amount of zero input cycle in “ENCODE step” according to equation (1) is (n−k)/2.
We shift only T+(16−t) zero cycles (into the polynomial defined effective LFSR) where T is the largest native number that meets the requirements:
We define “Zero Debt” ZD=(n−k)/2−(T+(16−t)) that is the amount of zero cycles that still needs to be shifted on the original Even and Odd LFSR. We can then respectively define “Additional encode Zero Debt”:
CZD=2*ZD=n−k−2T−32+2t
That is the amount of zero cycles that still needs to be shifted during the ADDITIONAL_ENCODE step through the odd and even LFSRs.
In the ADDITIONAL_ENCODE step we now shift in zero cycles:
n−k+CZD=2*(n−k)−2T−32+2t
This amount of zero cycles is a multiplicand of 16 and at the end the Even LFSR holds the required final result.
Support for any LFSR Length
As described before the invention supports a modulus operation on a generating polynomial g(x) with any desired taps positions. It is noted that any length of the generating polynomial can be supported as well (up to a maximal length implemented).
The naïve way is to place taps only for relevant register cells. All other register cells will operate as a shift register.
If for example the LFSR needs to be configured to an actual length of 28 bits, only taps that are connected to logics 130(8)-130(9) will be set. The other 128 bits will operate as a shift register meaning data will stream in on the input bus and only after 8 clock cycles the calculation will actually start. This delay lowers the throughput of the calculation module.
In order to save this time we suggest bypassing the delay cause.
If for example the LFSR needs to be configured to an actual length of 28 bits, the circuit is configured to drive din directly through bypass path 151. According to an embodiment of the invention lower LFSR registers left side to path 151 may be driven with constant (zeros for example) in order not to consume data transition power.
Memory cells 110′(s,t) and 110′(s−1,t) belong to the s′th and (s−1)′th stages of even LFSR 110′ of
A first multiplexer 191 receives prev_stage_output 181 from previous memory cell 110′(s−1,t), an input bit LFSR Din 182, and zero 183 and is controlled by control signal input_cnrl 162.
A second multiplexer 192 receives a merge_in 152 signal from memory cell 120′(a,b) and a odd_lfsr_out 184—which is the output port from a previous LFSR. It is controlled by merge_step 151 control signal.
The output of first multiplexer 191 and feedback 153 are fed to logic subset 30(1). The output of logic subset 30(1) and the output of second multiplexer 192 are provided to third multiplexer 193 that is controlled by merge_step 151 or Addition Encoding step 161. The output of the third multiplexer 193 is provided to memory cell 110′(s,t).
Method 200 may start by stage 210 of receiving a first stream of bits.
Stage 210 may be followed by stage 220 of splitting a first stream of bits to multiple second streams.
The number of the multiple second streams may be a power of two.
Stage 220 may be followed by stage 230 of encoding, in parallel and by using multiple linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs), the multiple second streams to provide third streams, wherein each second stream of the multiple second streams may be encoded using an LFSR of the multiple LFSRs. The encoding may include feeding the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs.
Stage 230 may include performing M/K shift operations on each second stream, wherein K may be a number of the multiple LFSRs.
Stage 230 may include performing multiple (Q) zero shifting operation after feeding the multiple second streams to the multiple LFSRs. This may occur, for example, when the size of the second streams differs from the length of the LFSRs. Q may be a positive integer. In this case stage 250 may include performing (M-J) shifting operations, wherein J may be a positive integer and may be responsive to Q and wherein M equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs. J may equal Q*2. Q may be selected in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream.
Stage 230 may include concatenating sets of bits, wherein each set of bits may include bits that may be located at a same respective location in each one of the different third streams, wherein an order of the sets of bits corresponds to respective locations of bits of the sets of bits.
Stage 230 may be executed during a single clock cycle.
Stage 230 may be followed by stage 240 of merging the third streams to provide a fourth stream. The fourth stream may be stored in the multiple LFSR.
Stage 240 may be followed by stage 250 of encoding the fourth stream to provide a fifth stream. The encoding of the fourth stream may include concatenating the multiple LFSRs while bypassing feedback circuits of some of the multiple LFSRs and shifting the fourth stream through the multiple LFSRs.
Stage 250 may include performing multiple (M) shift operations, wherein M may be a positive integer and equals an aggregate length of the multiple LFSRs.
According to an embodiment of the invention method 200 may include stage 205 of determining whether to bypass at least one stage of each LFSR in response to a relationship between a length of each LFSR and a length of each second stream. Step 210 is responsive to the determination (see, for example,
The invention may also be implemented in a computer program for running on a computer system, at least including code portions for performing steps of a method according to the invention when run on a programmable apparatus, such as a computer system or enabling a programmable apparatus to perform functions of a device or system according to the invention. The computer program may cause the storage system to allocate disk drives to disk drive groups.
A computer program is a list of instructions such as a particular application program and/or an operating system. The computer program may for instance include one or more of: a subroutine, a function, a procedure, an object method, an object implementation, an executable application, an applet, a servlet, a source code, an object code, a shared library/dynamic load library and/or other sequence of instructions designed for execution on a computer system.
The computer program may be stored internally on a non-transitory computer readable medium. All or some of the computer program may be provided on computer readable media permanently, removable or remotely coupled to an information processing system. The computer readable media may include, for example and without limitation, any number of the following: magnetic storage media including disk and tape storage media; optical storage media such as compact disk media (e.g., CD-ROM, CD-R, etc.) and digital video disk storage media; nonvolatile memory storage media including semiconductor-based memory units such as flash memory, EEPROM, EPROM, ROM; ferromagnetic digital memories; MRAM; volatile storage media including registers, buffers or caches, main memory, RAM, etc.
A computer process typically includes an executing (running) program or portion of a program, current program values and state information, and the resources used by the operating system to manage the execution of the process. An operating system (OS) is the software that manages the sharing of the resources of a computer and provides programmers with an interface used to access those resources. An operating system processes system data and user input, and responds by allocating and managing tasks and internal system resources as a service to users and programs of the system.
The computer system may for instance include at least one processing unit, associated memory and a number of input/output (I/O) devices. When executing the computer program, the computer system processes information according to the computer program and produces resultant output information via I/O devices.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific examples of embodiments of the invention. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made therein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
Moreover, the terms “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.
The connections as discussed herein may be any type of connection suitable to transfer signals from or to the respective nodes, units or devices, for example via intermediate devices. Accordingly, unless implied or stated otherwise, the connections may for example be direct connections or indirect connections. The connections may be illustrated or described in reference to being a single connection, a plurality of connections, unidirectional connections, or bidirectional connections. However, different embodiments may vary the implementation of the connections. For example, separate unidirectional connections may be used rather than bidirectional connections and vice versa. Also, plurality of connections may be replaced with a single connection that transfers multiple signals serially or in a time multiplexed manner. Likewise, single connections carrying multiple signals may be separated out into various different connections carrying subsets of these signals. Therefore, many options exist for transferring signals.
Although specific conductivity types or polarity of potentials have been described in the examples, it will be appreciated that conductivity types and polarities of potentials may be reversed.
Each signal described herein may be designed as positive or negative logic. In the case of a negative logic signal, the signal is active low where the logically true state corresponds to a logic level zero. In the case of a positive logic signal, the signal is active high where the logically true state corresponds to a logic level one. Note that any of the signals described herein may be designed as either negative or positive logic signals. Therefore, in alternate embodiments, those signals described as positive logic signals may be implemented as negative logic signals, and those signals described as negative logic signals may be implemented as positive logic signals.
Furthermore, the terms “assert” or “set” and “negate” (or “deassert” or “clear”) are used herein when referring to the rendering of a signal, status bit, or similar apparatus into its logically true or logically false state, respectively. If the logically true state is a logic level one, the logically false state is a logic level zero. And if the logically true state is a logic level zero, the logically false state is a logic level one.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the boundaries between logic blocks are merely illustrative and that alternative embodiments may merge logic blocks or circuit elements or impose an alternate decomposition of functionality upon various logic blocks or circuit elements. Thus, it is to be understood that the architectures depicted herein are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures may be implemented which achieve the same functionality.
Any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality may be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality.
Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that boundaries between the above described operations merely illustrative. The multiple operations may be combined into a single operation, a single operation may be distributed in additional operations and operations may be executed at least partially overlapping in time. Moreover, alternative embodiments may include multiple instances of a particular operation, and the order of operations may be altered in various other embodiments.
Also for example, in one embodiment, the illustrated examples may be implemented as circuitry located on a single integrated circuit or within a same device. Alternatively, the examples may be implemented as any number of separate integrated circuits or separate devices interconnected with each other in a suitable manner.
Also for example, the examples, or portions thereof, may implemented as soft or code representations of physical circuitry or of logical representations convertible into physical circuitry, such as in a hardware description language of any appropriate type.
Also, the invention is not limited to physical devices or units implemented in non-programmable hardware but can also be applied in programmable devices or units able to perform the desired device functions by operating in accordance with suitable program code, such as mainframes, minicomputers, servers, workstations, personal computers, notepads, personal digital assistants, electronic games, automotive and other embedded systems, cell phones and various other wireless devices, commonly denoted in this application as ‘computer systems’.
However, other modifications, variations and alternatives are also possible. The specifications and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.
In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word ‘comprising’ does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps then those listed in a claim. Furthermore, the terms “a” or “an,” as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as “at least one” and “one or more” in the claims should not be construed to imply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an.” The same holds true for the use of definite articles. Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4430701 | Christian et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4463375 | Macovski | Jul 1984 | A |
4584686 | Fritze | Apr 1986 | A |
4589084 | Fling et al. | May 1986 | A |
4777589 | Boettner et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4866716 | Weng | Sep 1989 | A |
5003597 | Merkle | Mar 1991 | A |
5077737 | Leger et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5297153 | Baggen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305276 | Uenoyama | Apr 1994 | A |
5440570 | Wei | Aug 1995 | A |
5592641 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623620 | Ranjeet et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640529 | Hasbun | Jun 1997 | A |
5657332 | Auclair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663901 | Harari et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5724538 | Bryg | Mar 1998 | A |
5729490 | Calligaro et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740395 | Hasbun | Apr 1998 | A |
5745418 | Hu et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5778430 | Giovannetti | Jul 1998 | A |
5793774 | Usui et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5920578 | Zook et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925144 | Sebaa | Jul 1999 | A |
5926409 | Engh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933368 | Hu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956268 | Lee | Sep 1999 | A |
5956473 | Hu et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968198 | Balachandran | Oct 1999 | A |
5982659 | Irrinki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011741 | Harari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016275 | Han | Jan 2000 | A |
6038634 | Ji et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6081878 | Estakhri | Jun 2000 | A |
6094465 | Stein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119245 | Hiratsuka | Sep 2000 | A |
6182261 | Haller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192497 | Yang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195287 | Hirano | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199188 | Shen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209114 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6259627 | Wong | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272052 | Miyauchi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278633 | Wong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279133 | Vafai et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301151 | Engh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6370061 | Yachareni et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374383 | Weng | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6504891 | Chevallier | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532169 | Mann et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532556 | Wong et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553533 | Demura et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560747 | Weng | May 2003 | B1 |
6625688 | Fruehling | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637002 | Weng et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639865 | Kwon | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6674665 | Mann et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675281 | Oh | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704902 | Shinbashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6751766 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772274 | Estakhri | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781910 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792569 | Cox et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6873543 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891768 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914809 | Hilton et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915477 | Gollamudi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952365 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961890 | Smith | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968421 | Conley | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990012 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996004 | Fastow et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999854 | Roth | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010739 | Feng et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7012835 | Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038950 | Hamilton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7068539 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079436 | Perner et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7149950 | Spencer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177977 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188228 | Chang et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7191379 | Adelmann et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196946 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203874 | Roohparvar | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212426 | Park | May 2007 | B2 |
7290203 | Emma et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292365 | Knox | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301928 | Nakabayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315916 | Bennett | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7388781 | Litsyn | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395404 | Gorobets | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7441067 | Gorobets et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443729 | Li | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450425 | Aritome | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454670 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466575 | Shalvi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7533328 | Alrod et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558109 | Brandman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593263 | Sokolov et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610433 | Randell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613043 | Cornwell | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7619922 | Li | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7697326 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706182 | Shalvi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716538 | Gonzalez | May 2010 | B2 |
7804718 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805663 | Brandman et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805664 | Yang et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7844877 | Litsyn et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7911848 | Eun | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7961797 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7975192 | Sommer | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8020073 | Emma et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8108590 | Chow et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8122328 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8159881 | Yang | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190961 | Yang | May 2012 | B1 |
8250324 | Haas | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8300823 | Bojinov | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305812 | Levy | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327246 | Weingarten | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8407560 | Ordentlich | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8417893 | Khmelnitsky | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8949493 | Wortman | Feb 2015 | B1 |
20010034815 | Dugan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010048380 | Medlock | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020063774 | Hillis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085419 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020154769 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156988 | Sekibe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174156 | Birru | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014582 | Nakanishi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065876 | Lasser | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101404 | Zhao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105620 | Bowen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177300 | Jeong | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192007 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015771 | Lasser et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030971 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059768 | Denk | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080985 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040153722 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153817 | Norman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181735 | Xin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203591 | Lee | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210706 | In et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050013165 | Ban | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018482 | Cemea et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050058290 | Kryzak | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083735 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117401 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120265 | Pline et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128811 | Kato et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138533 | Le-Bars et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144213 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144368 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050169057 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172179 | Brandenberger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213393 | Lasser | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243626 | Ronen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060059406 | Micheloni et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059409 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064537 | Oshima et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101193 | Murin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060195651 | Estakhri | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203587 | Li et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221692 | Chen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248434 | Radke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268608 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282411 | Fagin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284244 | Forbes | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294312 | Walmsley | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025157 | Wan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063180 | Asano et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081388 | Joo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098069 | Gordon | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103992 | Sakui et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104004 | So et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109858 | Conley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124652 | Litsyn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140006 | Chen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143561 | Gorobets | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150694 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168625 | Cornwell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171714 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171730 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180346 | Murin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223277 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226582 | Tang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226592 | Radke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228449 | Takano et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253249 | Kang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253250 | Shibata et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263439 | Cornwell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266291 | Toda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271494 | Gorobets | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297226 | Mokhlesi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010581 | Alrod et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028014 | Hilt et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049497 | Mo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055989 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082897 | Brandman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092026 | Brandman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104309 | Cheon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112238 | Kim | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116509 | Harari et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126686 | Sokolov et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127104 | Li et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128790 | Jung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130341 | Shalvi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137413 | Kong et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137414 | Park et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141043 | Flynn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148115 | Sokolov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158958 | Shalvi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159059 | Moyer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162079 | Astigarraga et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168216 | Lee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168320 | Cassuto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181001 | Shalvi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198650 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198652 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201620 | Gollub | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209114 | Chow et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219050 | Shalvi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225599 | Chae | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250195 | Chow et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263262 | Sokolov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282106 | Shalvi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285351 | Shlick et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301532 | Uchikawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024905 | Shalvi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043951 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046507 | Aritome | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072303 | Prall et al. | Mar 2009 | A9 |
20090091979 | Shalvi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092250 | Lablans | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103358 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106485 | Anholt | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113275 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125671 | Flynn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132755 | Radke | May 2009 | A1 |
20090027961 | Park | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144598 | Yoon | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144600 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150599 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150748 | Egner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157964 | Kasorla et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158126 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168524 | Golov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187803 | Anholt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199074 | Sommer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213653 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213654 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228761 | Perlmutter et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240872 | Perlmutter et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090282185 | Van Cauwenbergh | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282186 | Mokhlesi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287930 | Nagaraja | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300269 | Radke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323942 | Sharon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005270 | Jiang | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025811 | Bronner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030944 | Hinz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058146 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064096 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088557 | Weingarten et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091535 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095186 | Weingarten | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110787 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115376 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122113 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124088 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131580 | Kanter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131806 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131809 | Katz | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131826 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131827 | Sokolov et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131831 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146191 | Katz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146192 | Weingarten et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174853 | Lee | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180073 | Weingarten et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172179 | Gorobets et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199149 | Weingarten et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211724 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211833 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211856 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241793 | Sugimoto | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246265 | Moschiano et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251066 | Radke | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253555 | Weingarten et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257309 | Barsky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269008 | Leggette | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100149881 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293321 | Weingarten | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318724 | Yeh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051521 | Levy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055461 | Steiner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093650 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096612 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099460 | Dusija et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119562 | Steiner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153919 | Sabbag | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161775 | Weingarten | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110194353 | Hwang | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209028 | Post | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214029 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214039 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246792 | Weingarten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246852 | Sabbag | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252187 | Segal et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252188 | Weingarten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271043 | Segal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302428 | Weingarten | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001778 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005554 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005558 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005560 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008401 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008414 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017136 | Ordentlich et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051144 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063227 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066441 | Weingarten | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110250 | Sabbag et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124273 | Goss et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120246391 | Meir | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130191427 | Farrugia | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2009053963 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/118720 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/095902 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/078006 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/074979 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/074978 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072105 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072104 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072103 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072102 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072101 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072100 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053963 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053962 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053961 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/037697 A3, dated Mar 4, 2010. |
Yani Chen, Kcshab K. Parhi, “Small Area Parallel Chien Search Architectures for Long BCH Codes”, Ieee Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration(VLSI) Systems, vol. 12, No. 5, May 2004. |
Yuejian Wu, “Low Power Decoding of BCH Codes”, Nortel Networks, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, in Circuits and systems, 2004. ISCAS '04. Proceeding of the 2004 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, published May 23-26, 2004, vol. 2, pp. II-369-72 vol. 2. |
Michael Purser, “Introduction to Error Correcting Codes”, Artech House Inc., 1995. |
Ron M. Roth, “Introduction to Coding Theory”, Cambridge University Press, 2006. |
Akash Kumar, Sergei Sawitzki, “High-Throughput and Low Power Architectures for Reed Solomon Decoder”, (a.kumar at tue.nl, Eindhoven University of Technology and sergei.sawitzki at philips.com), Oct. 2005. |
Todd K.Moon, “Error Correction Coding Mathematical Methods and Algorithms”, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. |
Richard E. Blahut, “Algebraic Codes for Data Transmission”, Cambridge University Press, 2003. |
David Esseni, Bruno Ricco, “Trading-Off Programming Speed and Current Absorption in Flash Memories with the Ramped-Gate Programming Technique”, Ieee Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 4, Apr. 2000. |
Giovanni Campardo, Rino Micheloni, David Novosel, “VLSI-Design of Non-Volatile Memories”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005. |
John G. Proakis, “Digital Communications”, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. |
J.M. Portal, H. Aziza, D. Nee, “EEPROM Memory: Threshold Voltage Built in Self Diagnosis”, ITC Test International Conference, Paper 2.1, Feb. 2005. |
J.M. Portal, H. Aziza, D. Nee, “EEPROM Diagnosis Based on Threshold Voltage Embedded Measurement”, Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 21, 33-42, 2005. |
G. Tao, A. Scarpa, J. Dijkstra, W. Stidl, F. Kuper, “Data retention prediction for modern floating gate non-volatile memories”, Microelectronics Reliability 40 (2000), 1561-1566. |
T. Hirncno, N. Matsukawa, H. Hazama, K. Sakui, M. Oshikiri, K. Masuda, K. Kanda, Y. Itoh, J. Miyamoto, “A New Technique for Measuring Threshold Voltage Distribution in Flash EEPROM Devices”, Proc. IEEE 1995 Int. Conference on Microelectronics Test Structures, vol. 8, Mar. 1995. |
Boaz Eitan, Guy Cohen, Assaf Shappir, Eli Lusky, Amichai Givant, Meir Janai, Ilan Bloom, Yan Polansky, Oleg Dadashev, Avi Lavan, Ran Sahar, Eduardo Maayan, “4-bit per Cell NROM Reliability”, Appears on the website of Saifun.com , 2005. |
Paulo Cappelletti, Clara Golla, Piero Olivo, Enrico Zanoni, “Flash Memories”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. |
JEDEC Standard, “Stress-Test-Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits”, JEDEC Solid State Technology Association. JEDEC Standard No. 47F pp. 1-26, Dec. 2007. |
Dempster, et al., “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), vol. 39, No. 1 (1997), pp. 1-38. |
Mielke, et al., “Flash EEPROM Threshold Instabilities due to Charge Trapping During Program/Erase Cycling”, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 4, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 335-344. |
Daneshbeh, “Bit Serial Systolic Architectures for Multiplicative Inversion and Division over GF (2)”, A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2005, pp. 1-118. |
Chen, Formulas for the solutions of Quadratic Equations over GF (2), IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-28, No. 5, Sep. 1982, pp. 792-794. |
Berlekamp et al., “On the Solution of Algebraic Equations over Finite Fields”, Inform. Cont. 10, Oct. 1967, pp. 553-564. |