A variety of packers are used in wellbores to isolate specific wellbore regions. A packer is delivered downhole on a conveyance and expanded against the surrounding wellbore wall to isolate a region of the wellbore. Once set against the surrounding wellbore wall, the packer can be subjected to substantial heat, pressures and forces. Consequently, the packer may experience wear that increases the likelihood of packer failure.
The packer may be designed with metal cables extending between packer extremities, such as mechanical end fittings. The metal cables are surrounded with a rubber material that expands when the packer is expanded. During expansion, the spacing between each cable is increased and the rubber thickness is decreased. Under high differential pressures, high packer inflation pressures, and/or high temperatures, the rubber material can become viscous and creep. The movement of the rubber material may result in contact between cable layers and/or contact between cables and portions of the packer extremities. The contact between cables and the significant tension placed on the cables can lead to cable deterioration and breakage, ultimately ending in packer destruction. The damage often occurs at contact points between cables and an outer skirt of the packer extremity and/or at contact points between adjacent cables, often in proximity to one or both packer extremities. The cables tend to break at the side of the packer experiencing higher pressure differentials.
Packers also can experience undue wear and potential failure due to the presence of voids in the packer structure. The presence of voids potentially leads to detrimental collapse of the rubber material and/or friction between packer components during packer expansion. Additionally, the outer rubber layer of packers is susceptible to breakage at locations experiencing high axial pressure differentials. Breakage of the outer rubber layer typically occurs near the low-pressure end of the packer. Once breakage occurs, the broken rubber creates difficulties in extracting the packer. Also, breakage of the outer rubber layer tends to leave a gap between the packer and the wellbore, and the rubber material tends to expand to fill this gap. Consequently, as the packer expands, components of the mechanical structure, e.g. steel cables and anti-extrusion layers, can contact each other and create friction that leads to further damage of the packer.
In general, the present invention provides a system and method for forming dependable seals along wellbores. A packer is constructed with a plurality of elastomeric layers and an internal mechanical layer that extend between mechanical extremities. One or more protective features is added to, or used in conjunction with, the packer to reduce wear and the potential for detrimental damage during use of the packer.
Certain embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The present invention generally relates to a system and method for forming seals along wellbores by providing a packer resistant to wear and degradation in a downhole environment. The packer generally comprises a plurality of elastomeric layers and an internal mechanical layer that extend between mechanical extremities, such as packer end fittings. In one embodiment, the packer is an inflatable packer having an interior bladder, an outer bladder, and a mechanical structural layer between the bladders. The mechanical layer may comprise a plurality of cable layers formed of metal cables positioned in an elastomeric, e.g. rubber, material. Additionally, the mechanical layer may comprise, or work in cooperation with, a separate anti-extrusion layer deployed through the elastomeric material between mechanical extremities.
Depending on the specific embodiment, various protective features are added to, or used in conjunction with, the packer to reduce the potential for detrimental damage to regions of the elastomeric material and/or portions of the mechanical layer. For example, some embodiments utilize features to prevent contact between components of the mechanical layer and adjacent components of the mechanical layer or packer extremities. Other protective features can be used in addition or as an alternative to reduce the potential for component wear/damage in other areas of the packer. For example, leak paths can be created in a manner that reduces the potential for damage due to voids in the packer structure and friction between packer components. In another example, components are positioned to prevent unwanted extrusion of elastomeric material during curing of the packer. Protective features also can be incorporated into the packer structure to prevent unwanted breakage of the outer elastomeric or seal layer.
In one specific example, at least one protective layer is incorporated into the packer to prevent contact between components, thereby avoiding component wear which could eventually damage the packer. For example, the mechanical layer of an inflatable packer can be formed with two or more cable layers. A protective layer is positioned between the cable layers to prevent contact between the cable layers even if the elastomeric packer material undergoes creep when exposed to the high temperatures and pressures in the downhole, wellbore environment. The protective layer or layers can be formed of an expandable, compliant fiber material, having fibers formed of, for example, aramid, carbon, glass, thermoplastic, or other suitable fiber materials.
The fibers in each protective layer may be set longitudinally, parallel to the axis of the packer, or with an angle compatible with the angle of the cable layers in the packer. For example, if the cables, e.g. steel cables, are set with an angle giving a 10% shortening ratio when the outside diameter of the packer is expanded by 50%, the fibers of this layer may be oriented with an angle relative to the axis of the packer that provides a shortening ratio of between 0% and 10%. By arranging the protective layer in this manner, no tensile damage occurs due to the pulling force associated with an excessive shortening ratio. The use of fiber material in creating the protective layers has been found to create a layer able to inflate and deflate without damage while preventing the cables from touching each other and/or other adjacent components.
Referring generally to
Referring generally to
In
Packer 26 also comprises a protective layer 50 that may be deployed between cable layers 46 to prevent contact between cables 48 of adjacent cable layers 46. By way of example, protective layer 50 is formed as a fiber layer having an expandable layer of fibers, such as aramid, carbon, glass, thermoplastic, or other suitable fibers. The fibers may be arranged longitudinally in an orientation parallel to the axis of the packer 26 or at an angle compatible with the angle of the cable layers 46 to avoid an excessive shortening ratio.
The packer also comprises various other components, such as an anti-extrusion layer 52 which may be formed as part of mechanical layer 44 or may be positioned to cooperate with mechanical layer 44. In the embodiment illustrated, anti-extrusion layer 52 is located radially inward of cable layers 46 and radially outward of an inner bladder 54. In this example, inner bladder 54 is formed of an elastomeric material, e.g. rubber, similar to outer bladder 36.
Prior to expanding packer 26, the cables 48 of cable layers 46 are substantially separated by elastomeric material 56 and protective layer 50, as illustrated in
Referring generally to
Similar to protective layer 50, protective layer 62 may be formed as a protective fiber layer having fibers arranged, e.g. unidirectional, braided, or other suitable arrangement, to prevent direct contact between the skirt 58 and cables 48 while reducing local stress between the cables and skirt to provide a stronger, longer-lasting packer. In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring generally to
In one embodiment, a lubricant material 64, e.g. grease, is used to coat/lubricate certain components that do not need to be bonded together. For example, the lubricant material 64 may be applied to cables 48, anti-extrusion layer 52, and/or other internal components. It should be noted that an extra volume of lubricant material, e.g. grease, also can be contained in a cavity arranged in the packer rubber adjacent to any internal component. The lubricant material 64 helps the packer structure resist detrimental effects resulting from high hydrostatic pressure. In addition or as an alternative to lubricant material 64, a leak path or communication path 66 is established between the well fluid and the packer structure. For example, leak path 66 may be established in a generally radial direction through the elastomeric material 56, e.g. rubber and/or Teflon®, surrounding cable layers 46. The leak path 66 may be established by positioning an insert component 68 through the elastomeric material 56. Depending on the environment and the type of material 56 used in packer 26, the insert may be formed from Teflon®, a suitable high temperature thermoplastic, aramid, carbon, or other suitable materials that create a leak path along the interface between the insert and the surrounding material 56. In one example, the material selected for insert 68 is incompatible with elastomeric material 56 to prevent damage during packer expansion. In other words, the material of insert 68 does not bond with material 56. This also ensures the leak path does not plug when the packer 26 is deformed.
In another embodiment, packer 26 is protected by preventing extrusion of elastomeric material 56 along an interior of each packer nipple 60 during packer construction. As illustrated in
Referring again to
In another embodiment, the outer layer/bladder 36 is designed with features to prevent breakage of the material. Breakage of the elastomeric material can create a variety of difficulties, including difficulty in extraction of the packer and increased potential for contact between internal packer components, such as cables 48.
The outer layer 36 often is relied on to perform a variety of functions, including insuring that a seal is created between the wellbore and packer when the packer is inflated. The outer layer also must mitigate well irregularities while limiting excessive structural deformation. Furthermore, the material selected for outer layer 36 should be able to consistently form the desired seals during manufacturing and also provide adequate protection of internal packer components against the harsh elements found in a wellbore environment. In other applications, the outer layer is used to avoid mud migration within the packer structure while avoiding packer failure during inflation and deflation. The outer bladder layer 36 also can be utilized in facilitating deflation of the packer. Accordingly, maintaining the integrity of the outer bladder layer 36 is important in many well applications.
As illustrated in
The thick skin section 82 utilizes elastomeric material 56 with a substantially greater thickness in locations where breakage of the outer bladder layer is not expected. In these regions, the thickness of the skin can be selected to provide resiliency that facilitates deflation of the packer. The thickness of skin in thick skin section 82 also should enable good pressure differential sealing even if some surface damage occurs during running-in. The thickness also is selected to protect the internal packer structure against damage that can otherwise be caused by wellbore irregularity and roughness.
In some embodiments, the mechanical layer 44 is designed to flex to a greater diameter in thin skin section 80, as illustrated in
Also, in any of the embodiments described above where a component is described as being formed of rubber or comprising rubber, the rubber may include an oil resistant rubber, such as NBR (Nitrile Butadiene Rubber), HNBR (Hydrogenated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber) and/or FKM (Fluoroelastomers). In a specific example, the rubber may be a high percentage acrylonytrile HNBR rubber, such as an HNBR rubber having a percentage of acrylonytrile in the range of approximately 21 to approximately 49%. Components suitable for the rubbers described in this paragraph include, but are not limited to, elastomeric material 56, outer bladder 36 and inner bladder 54.
As described above, well system 20 and packer 26 may be constructed in a variety of configurations for use in many environments and applications. The packer 26 may be constructed from many types of materials and with components positioned in various arrangements. Additionally, individual packer protection features or various combinations of packer protection features can be utilized in the individual packer. Depending on the packer construction and the environment in which the packer is to be used, the size, materials and configuration of the protection features can be adjusted.
Accordingly, although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this invention. Such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2258674 | Ceska | Oct 1941 | A |
2275086 | Otterbourg | Mar 1942 | A |
2643722 | Lynes et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
3529667 | Malone | Sep 1970 | A |
3581816 | Malone | Jun 1971 | A |
4310161 | Streich | Jan 1982 | A |
4467835 | Champleboux | Aug 1984 | A |
4467836 | Ragout | Aug 1984 | A |
5205567 | Quinlan et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5340626 | Head | Aug 1994 | A |
5778982 | Hauck et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6431275 | Turley | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6752205 | Kutac et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7017881 | Ward | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20020195244 | Coronado et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040216871 | Mendez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060219400 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070089877 | Corre | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142547 | Vaidya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070193736 | Corre et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070227724 | Saltel | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261847 | Saltel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289735 | Corre et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100122821 | Corre et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1780373 | May 2007 | EP |
2262553 | Jun 1993 | GB |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued in European Application No. 10774612.5 on Mar. 31, 2014; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130228279 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12466497 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13858622 | US |