The present invention relates generally to data communication networks. In particular, the present invention relates to establishing a virtual private network (VPN) between entities over a public data communication network, such as the Internet.
Enterprises are increasingly being asked to provide access to proprietary applications and data to employees and partners located outside the perimeter of the enterprise network. To do so in a cost-effective manner, enterprises are looking to leverage public networks such as the Internet for providing remote access. However, because the Internet is a publicly accessible network, issues of network security arise.
Multiple technologies are available for accomplishing secure Internet communications, including but not limited to those that rely on Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption or Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) encryption. SSL encryption is incorporated into most Web browsers utilized by today's Internet users while IPSec presently is not.
SSL technology is limited, however, in its ability to provide remote access to a private network in that an SSL-encrypted client cannot directly access Domain Name Servers, Windows Internet Naming Service (WINS) Servers, or other resources on a private network that are not visible from outside the enterprise network but are essential to reaching resources on that network. In addition, firewalls typically block certain traffic through various ports and limit access to various Internet Protocol (IP) addresses automatically, thereby preventing SSL-encrypted clients from accessing certain destinations on the enterprise network. Finally, important applications such as various client-server e-mail programs and other enterprise application programs do not support SSL encryption natively and so limit the effectiveness of SSL in providing secure remote access to these resources.
Virtual private network (VPN) connections allow remote users and client programs (in other words, those that are not directly connected) to achieve encrypted remote access to a private data network via public internetworks (such as the Internet). Conventional approaches to setting up a VPN have included setting up remote access using pre-installed “thick clients” that are based on the IPSec standard or SSL and earlier versions of Web browser-based dynamic SSL VPN technology. Each is explained in more detail below.
VPN thick clients based on IPSec technology involve the transmission of whole packets over the Internet in encrypted form. Though robust and secure, IPSec technology has significant limitations. These limitations include, among other things, the administrative challenges in rolling out, managing, and maintaining the VPN client software for remote access users because every user must download and install the IPSec software on his or her computer. In addition, utilizing IPSec VPN technology, users cannot access key resources from alternate endpoints (in other words, any device on which the user has not installed the relevant software). Furthermore, user access to sites protected by firewalls is limited or, in some cases, nonexistent.
A conventional SSL version of the thick client avoids the firewall limitations of the IPSec thick client by using a standard SSL port that firewalls generally keep open. However, such an implementation still incurs the disadvantages of having to have the client software pre-installed from wherever the access takes place. These disadvantages include management complexity and the inability to provide access from any client computer equipped with a standard Web browser without the need for installing special software.
A conventional dynamic port proxy approach preserves the firewall traversing capabilities of an SSL thick client, and addresses the limitations of both IPSec and SSL thick clients by utilizing the built-in encryption capabilities of a Web browser, thereby obviating the need for installing special client software. In accordance with such an approach, a gateway device or program on an access server downloads a Java applet to monitor ports for encrypted traffic. If encrypted traffic is detected, the client sending the encrypted data is configured to re-direct its traffic through an applicable secure port. The problem with this technique, however, is that it works only for addresses that have names. In other words, it will not work with a static IP address or where the IP address and/or port of a server dynamically changes. Therefore, these implementations cannot handle applications that use dynamically assigned IP addresses, dynamically change ports, or use hardcoded IP addresses to reach unnamed resources.
What is desired, then, is a system and method for providing secure remote access to applications and data in an enterprise network over a public data communication network, such as the Internet, that improves upon and addresses the aforementioned shortcomings of conventional solutions.
In its broadest application, the present invention is directed to a system and method for establishing a virtual private network (VPN) between a client and a private data communication network, wherein the client is securely connected to the private data communication network via a public data communication network. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the private data communication network comprises an enterprise network upon which reside applications and data that are proprietary to an enterprise, and the public data communication network comprises the Internet.
In a method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an encrypted data communication session is established between a gateway or program on an access server and a client over a public data communication network. The communication session may be encrypted through various methods including, but not limited to Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols, Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) or other encryption methods.
In response to the establishment of the encrypted data communication session, the gateway or program on the access server sends a program back to the client. In an embodiment, the program comprises a control or programming component (i.e., a self-sufficient program that can be run throughout the network environment) that is automatically installed and executed by a client Web browser. In an embodiment, once it been installed on the client, the program engages the ability to dynamically intercept communications from client applications destined for resources on the specified private data communication network by acting as an interceptor that is installed as a “hook” at a transport layer of the operating system on the client.
In an embodiment, the program can also act as a connection proxy for intercepted communications by providing an endpoint for such intercepted communications. The program can further introduce the ability to serve as an encryption endpoint in the encrypted data communication session and can direct such communications to the gateway or access server via the encrypted data communication session. In an alternative embodiment, the program can be separated into two or more separate programs—one performing the dynamic intercept functions on the client and a second performing, among other things, the network proxy and encryption functions.
An embodiment of the present invention includes the interception of name translation and connection requests by the program. A client and server communicating over a VPN in accordance with such an embodiment are free to use whatever IP addresses they choose as well as dynamically change those addresses at run time, since such an embodiment does not rely upon a static name to address translation.
When the gateway or access server receives encrypted communications from the client via the encrypted data communication session, it decrypts the encrypted communication and provides it to the appropriate destination resource on the private data communication network. In an embodiment, the gateway terminates the traffic (as a proxy) and is then able to further process the request as described below rather than simply sending it straight along to the destination on the private network. The gateway, in this embodiment, can carry out additional processing on the connection including but not limited to back-end encryption, serving responses out of a cache, local network load balancing, global service load balancing or compression.
If there are any responsive communications from the destination resource, these are directed to the gateway (and potentially encrypted where back-end encryption is utilized as described below) for transport to the installed client program via the encrypted data communication session. The installed client program decrypts the responsive communications and passes them to the appropriate client application.
In a specific method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an encrypted data communication session, such as a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) session is established between a gateway and a client over a public data communication network. The gateway then sends a first program to the client in response to establishment of the encrypted data communication session. In an embodiment, the first program comprises dynamically delivered program components, such as an Active X control that is automatically installed and executed by a client Web browser. Other such components may be a Java applet, Java Script, dynamic shared library or other such program components.
When the first program is executed by the client, among other things, it installs a second program on the client. The second program operates to intercept communications from client applications destined for resources on the private data communication network. The second program also operates to provide the intercepted communications to the first program for sending to the gateway via the encrypted data communication session instead of directly to the resources on the private data communication network. In an embodiment, the second program comprises a dynamic interceptor, for example a filter device driver, that is installed as a “hook” at a transport layer of an operating system of the client.
In an embodiment, the first program acts as a connection proxy, providing an endpoint for the intercepted communications. Other non-preinstalled SSL VPNs, including the Port Proxy, are not able to act as proxy for every connection but instead serve as endpoint only for those named resources and ports that the Port Proxy is pre-configured to support.
When the gateway receives encrypted communications from the client via the encrypted data communication session established by the program components, it decrypts the encrypted communication and provides it to the appropriate destination resource on the private data communication network.
In another embodiment, the gateway can serve as an intermediate proxy for the application traffic sent via the VPN and is then able to further process the application requests rather than simply sending them straight along to the destination on the private network. This embodiment permits the gateway to carry out further processing on the connection such as back-end encryption, in which the traffic is re-encrypted by the gateway before delivery to the appropriate destination on the private data communication network thereby enabling users to achieve additional network security. Furthermore, such processing can permit the gateway to serve responses out of a cache rather than requiring additional work by the destination resource. Alternatively or additionally, the gateway can perform local network load balancing, global service load balancing or compression on the connection data.
If there are any responsive communications from the destination resource, these are provided to the gateway (and potentially encrypted by the destination resource prior to transmission to the gateway in an embodiment where back-end encryption is utilized to provide end-to-end network security) for transport to the first program via the encrypted data communication session. The first program decrypts the responsive communications and passes them to the appropriate client application via the second program.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a user is not required to pre-install any software on a client system or device. Instead, the necessary components are dynamically installed on the client as a result of logging in to a gateway and subsequently removed at log out. This presents a distinct advantage over conventional solutions for secure remote access, such as solutions based on IPSec technology, wherein software must be preinstalled onto a client by a user.
Furthermore, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, communications from a client application to resources residing on a private data communication network are re-directed to a gateway based on interception of those communications. This is in direct contrast to conventional VPN solutions that utilize a dynamic port proxy, and therefore require a name to address translation on the client in order to operate. Because an embodiment of the present invention is based on interception of name translation and connection requests, rather than port proxy, a client and server communicating over a VPN in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention are free to use whatever IP addresses they choose as well as dynamically change those addresses at run time, since such an embodiment does not rely upon a static name to address translation. Thus, an embodiment of the present invention permits the use of hard-coded IP addresses, dynamic IP addresses and dynamic ports.
Additionally, an embodiment of the present invention provides a VPN solution that is based on proxying connections. For example, an embodiment of the present invention provides a connection proxying based encrypted tunnel for secure remote access that terminates the connection and is therefore able to extract out the TCP payload of the original connection and encapsulate such application payload into a new TCP payload, transmitted via a separate TCP connection. Conventional IPSec solutions encrypt all packets and use a tunnel established at the network packet layer for communication between devices. In other conventional SSL solutions, traffic from multiple applications might be transmitted by tunneling complete TCP packets, inclusive of all TCP headers, inside a new TCP connection established by the port proxy or other solution. The encapsulating connection is a second TCP connection that delivers the original connection intact, including all headers and without modification, to a gateway that unwraps the payload of the original connection from the capsule TCP connection and completes the delivery, again without modification, to the final private network destination.
This approach of threading of complete TCP connections inside other connections creates the potential for problems. Because TCP protocol generates slowdowns, retransmissions and acknowledgements following packet loss or packet delays, or perceived packet losses or delays, the doubled layers of TCP under the tunneling solution amplify any such packet losses or packet delays as the TCP protocol generates additional slowdowns, retransmissions and acknowledgments. Thus, new levels of delays and retransmissions significantly intensify the original slowdown and are a significant limitation to delivering multiple TCP payloads through a TCP-over-TCP connection tunnel.
In contrast, in an embodiment of the present invention, a separate encryption session tunnel is created for each application connection. Because each connection in such an embodiment is terminated or proxied and the TCP payload separated out and delivered over its own newly generated TCP connection, the embodiment may more easily avoid cascaded connection delays by avoiding TCP-over-TCP problems. Since the application payload is sent via a set of separate TCP connections, the loss of delay of a packet in the network affects only one connection and does not induce cascaded retransmissions unlike the tunneled case. Such an embodiment may also be easily integrated with additional connection-specific processing of application content traffic in the tunnel.
Because an embodiment of the present invention provides a VPN solution that acts as a proxy terminating connections at the client before encrypting such data and sending it over an SSL or other session tunnel, additional processing of such intercepted packets can be performed more effectively. Such processing can include DNS name resolution of such traffic in order to enable client applications to use whatever IP addresses they choose as well as dynamically change those addresses at run time as described above. Such additional processing also permits the invention to be effectively integrated with other technologies such as global service load balancing to achieve greater availability and greater efficiency among distributed gateways or servers. The above embodiment and the connection processing made possible thereby additionally also enables the present invention to keep detailed logs and statistics regarding the packets.
By making possible further connection-specific content processing of application data, an embodiment of the present invention also permits integration of VPN capabilities, such as SSL VPN capabilities, with other beneficial functions that may be provided by a gateway to an enterprise network. For example, an embodiment of the present invention permits integration of application layer optimization, switching and security features at the gateway. In particular, per-connection tunneling in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention permits easy integration of VPN features with request switching technology (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,986 issued Jun. 25, 2002 and entitled “Internet Client-Server Multiplexer” and in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/690,437, filed Oct. 18, 2000 and entitled “Apparatus, Method and Computer Program Product for Efficiently Pooling Connections Between Clients and Servers,” each of which is incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein) that is able to apply such application data processing capabilities at very high throughputs on multiple interleaved data streams simultaneously. The VPN features of an embodiment of the present invention may also be readily integrated with request level load balancing, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) dynamic application caching, HTTP compression, Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) compression, defense against TCP and HTTP distributed denial of service attacks, HTTP virus defense scanning, and the like.
Finally, in an embodiment of the present invention, the integration of VPN features is extended by synchronizing the processing of the SSL decryption and end point processing described above with other processing of the connections to be carried out at the gateway including those described above such as load balancing, HTTP dynamic application caching, HTTP compression, TCP compression, defense against TCP and HTTP distributed denial of service attacks, HTTP virus defense scanning, and the like. In this way, an embodiment of the invention is able to deliver the benefits of such integrated processing which include: simplification of the network by avoiding having to interconnect several different systems to provide the combination of processing functions in specific order (e.g., compression before caching before encryption); an acceleration of processing by inspecting the application layer data once and taking multiple actions on it; simplification of administration by using a unified policy system to express actions to be taken, etc.
Further features and advantages of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. It is noted that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein. Such embodiments are presented herein for illustrative purposes only. Additional embodiments will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) based on the teachings contained herein.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the relevant art(s) to make and use the invention.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference characters identify corresponding elements throughout. In the drawings, like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements. The drawing in which an element first appears is indicated by the leftmost digit(s) in the corresponding reference number.
As further shown in
In an embodiment, gateway 108 comprises a network server configured to perform the features of the present invention in addition to various network tasks relating to optimization of Web-based and/or client-server applications, traffic management, and security. However, the invention is not so limited, and gateway 108 may comprise any network system or device that is configured to perform the features of the present invention.
Each client 102a-102n comprises a system or device adapted to communicate with other entities over public data communication network 104, including but not limited to gateway 108. As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the relevant art(s), a variety of conventional communication protocols may be used to implement communication between each client 102a-102n and other entities on public data communication network 104. For example, in an embodiment, a Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite is used to establish links and transport data, while a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or File Transfer Protocol (FTP) application layer is used for client-server communication. However, these examples are illustrative. The present invention is not intended to be limited to a specific communication protocol or application, and other proprietary or non-proprietary network communication protocols and applications can be used.
In an embodiment, each client 102a-102n comprises a personal computer (PC) running under the control of an operating system and implementing a commercially-available Web browser for network communication. For example, each client 102a-102n may comprise a PC running a Microsoft Windows® operating system—and implementing a Microsoft Internet Explorer® Web browser. Alternately, each client 102a-102n may comprise a PC running a Macintosh® operating system and implementing a Netscape Navigator® Web browser. However, the invention is not limited to these examples, and other operating systems and browsers may be used. Additionally, the invention is not limited to personal computers, and each client 102a-102n may comprise any device or system capable of communicating over public data communication network 104, including but not limited to laptop computers, tablet computers, set-top boxes, and network-enabled televisions, handheld computers and mobile telephones.
The method of flowchart 200 begins at step 202, in which one of clients 102a-102n (hereinafter generically referred to as client 102) performs a log in procedure and establishes an encrypted data communication session with gateway 108 via public data communication network 104. As will be described in more detail herein, the encrypted data communication session is used as a tunnel to bridge traffic from client 102 to any of servers 110a through 110n which reside behind gateway 108 in private data communication network 106. In an embodiment, client 102 uses a commercially-available Web browser, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer® or Netscape Navigator®, to log in and establish a data communication session with gateway 108 using Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or other encryption methods including IPSec or others. A protocol such as Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Secure Sockets Layer (HTTPS) may be used to initiate the encrypted data communication session.
In response to log in and establishment of the encrypted data communication session, gateway 108 sends a first program to client 102 over public data communication network 104 as shown at step 204. The first program is configured to act as a tunnel endpoint for communication over the encrypted data communication session. In an embodiment, the first program comprises a plug-in application that is automatically installed and executed by the client Web browser. For example, the first program may comprise an ActiveX control that is provided as a plug-in to be executed by a Microsoft Internet Explorer® Web browser. Alternatively, the first program may comprise a Java applet that is provided as a plug-in to be executed by a Netscape Navigator® Web browser or another control or programming component that works across network environments.
At step 206, client 102 installs and executes the first program, wherein executing the first program comprises installing a second program on client 102. The second program is configured, in part, to intercept communications from applications running on client 102 that are destined for resources on private data communication network 106 and to provide the intercepted communications to the first program for sending to gateway 108 via the encrypted data communication session. The second program is also configured to provide intranet network name resolution service and optionally split network traffic. By splitting the traffic, an embodiment of the present invention is able to determine what traffic is channeled to an SSL tunnel and what is permitted to continue along for regular processing by the transport layer stack.
In an embodiment, the second program comprises a dynamic interceptor (for instance, a filter device driver) that is inserted as a “hook” into an operating system of client 102. For example, the second program may comprise a filter device driver that is attached to the transport layer stack of the client operating system, such as the transport layer stack of a Microsoft Windows® operating system.
As shown at step 208, once the first and second programs have been installed, applications running on client 102 may communicate with and access resources, such as applications and data, on private data communication network 106 via the established encrypted data communication session. The manner in which this communication occurs will be discussed in more detail below with respect to
At step 210, client 102 performs a log out procedure to disconnect from private data communication network 106, which terminates the encrypted data communication session with gateway 108. In an embodiment, at log out time, the first program automatically cleans up the modifications made to the client operating system to return the operating system to its original status.
The method of flowchart 300 begins at step 302, in which a client application makes a new connection or resolves a domain name to the transport layer stack of the client operating system. When this occurs, the functions of the second program are automatically called before any transport layer functions are initiated, as shown at step 304. As described above, in an embodiment, the second program comprises a dynamic interceptor such as a filter device driver attached to the transport layer stack of the client operating system.
At step 306, the second program intercepts communications from the client application that are destined for resources on private data communication network 106 and re-routes them to the first program, which in an embodiment comprises an ActiveX control plug-in, a Java applet or other control or programming component that works across network environments.
At step 308, each intercepted connection is terminated or proxied and the first program separates out the payload and encapsulates the payload into a new connection for delivery via the established encrypted data communication session. In an embodiment, the payload is a TCP payload and is encapsulated into a new TCP connection.
At step 310, the first program sends the intercepted communications over public data communication network 104 to gateway 108 in private data communication network 106 via the pre-established encrypted data communication session, which includes encrypting the intercepted communications and sending the encrypted intercepted communications to gateway 108. In an embodiment, encryption is carried out in accordance with SSL protocols.
At step 312, gateway 108 acts as a proxy terminating the connection sent by the first program and decrypts the communications received from the first program on client 102 and passes the decrypted communications on to the appropriate destination resource on private network 106 via a different connection that the gateway 108 has established with the destination resource on private network 106. In an embodiment, decryption is carried out in accordance with SSL protocols or other applicable encryption and decryption protocols. At step 314, the destination resource processes the decrypted communications.
If the decrypted communications include a request for which there is a response, then the destination resource sends out responsive communications to gateway 108, as shown at step 316. At step 318, gateway 108 sends the responsive communications over public data communication network 104 to the first program on client 102 via the pre-established encrypted data communication session, which includes encrypting the responsive communications and sending the encrypted responsive communications to the first program. In an embodiment, encryption is carried out in accordance with SSL protocols or other applicable encryption and decryption protocols.
At step 320, the first program decrypts the responsive communications and passes them on to the appropriate client application via the second program, which is attached to the transport layer stack of the client operating system.
In accordance with an alternate embodiment of the present invention, client 102 performs additional processing of the intercepted communications before sending them over public data communication network 104 at step 308. Because an embodiment of the present invention provides a VPN solution that acts as a proxy terminating connections at the client before encrypting such data and sending it over the pre-established encrypted data communication session, such additional processing can be performed more effectively. Such processing can include DNS name resolution of the intercepted communications in order to enable client applications to use whatever IP addresses they choose as well as dynamically change those addresses at run time. Such additional processing permits embodiments of the invention to be effectively integrated with other technologies such as global service load balancing to achieve greater availability and greater efficiency among distributed gateways or servers. The additional connection processing can also enable the keeping of detailed logs and statistics regarding the intercepted communications.
In a further alternate embodiment of the present invention, gateway 108 terminates communications received from the first program on client 102 (as a proxy) and further processes one or more requests included therein rather than simply sending the communications straight along to a destination on private data communication network 106 as shown at step 312. This further processing can include back-end encryption wherein communications are re-encrypted by gateway 108 before delivery to the appropriate destination on private data communication network 106, thereby providing end-to-end network security. The destination will thereafter decrypt the traffic and respond appropriately. Further, such processing can permit gateway 108 to serve responses out of a cache rather than requiring additional work by a destination server, perform local network load balancing, global service load balancing and/or compression on the communications to enhance the efficiency and responsiveness of private data communication network 106.
In accordance with the above-described methods, a VPN based on an encrypted data communication session is established between client 102 and private data communication network 106. For example, in an embodiment, a secure VPN is established via HTTPS. Thereafter, all communications from client 102 to private data communication network 106 are routed via the first program to gateway 108, and vice-versa, through this encrypted data communication session.
It should be noted that although the encrypted data communication session may be established using HTTPS, the communications that are passed through the encrypted data communication session need not be HTTPS packet data or even HTTP packet data. For example, the communications may also comprise Transmission Control Protocol/User Datagram Protocol (TCP/UDP) or Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) packet data, although these examples are not intended to be limiting.
It should also be noted that although various client-side functions of an embodiment of the present invention are described above as being performed by a first program and a second program, persons skilled in the relevant art(s) will readily appreciate that those functions can be performed by a single program or multiple programs.
Furthermore, although the method described in reference to
The above-described method for establishing a VPN is connection proxying in that an encrypted data communication session is created by terminating the connection and encapsulating the TCP. payload of the original connection into a new TCP connection for each application connection. This is in contrast to a conventional IPSec approach, in which an encryption tunnel is developed on the network packet level and is therefore not tied to any particular application or communication session.
The above-described method is also distinguished from other conventional SSL solutions such as the Port Proxy approach where each connection is encapsulated as a complete entity inclusive of all TCP headers, inside a new encrypted TCP connection established by the port proxy. The encapsulating connection is a second, session-wide TCP connection that delivers the original connection intact including all headers and without modification to a gateway which unwraps the payload of the original connection from the capsule TCP connection and completes the delivery without modification to the final private network destination. The above described Port Proxy approach of threading of TCP connections inside other connections tunneled over an SSL connection can experience problems because TCP protocol generates slowdowns and retransmissions and acknowledgements in the event of packet loss and those delays and transmissions get significantly amplified where multiple complete TCP payloads are delivered through the single SSL TCP connection tunnel. The present embodiment avoids these delays by transmitting only the TCP payload of the terminated or proxied connection separated out and delivered via a separately established, new connection to the gateway.
Because an embodiment of the present invention provides a VPN solution that acts as a proxy terminating connections at the client before encrypting such data and sending it over an SSL session tunnel, the program is better able to manage connection based packet flows in a way that enables additional processing of such intercepted packets. Such additional processing permits the invention to be effectively integrated with other technologies such as global service load balancing to achieve greater availability and greater efficiency among distributed gateways or servers. The above embodiment and the additional connection processing also enables the present invention to keep detailed logs and statistics regarding the packets.
In addition, by implementing a connection-proxying based VPN where only the TCP payload of the original connection is transmitted through the secure VPN to the gateway, the above described method also permits integration at the gateway of the VPN with caching technologies that monitor Web object requests and store certain of those objects it retrieves from a server in order to improve network performance. Further, the above described method enables successful integration of the SSL VPN into other networking technologies including Load Balancing and TCP Buffering by proxying the connections at the gateway and thus creating the opportunity for further processing of the connection at the gateway.
Because the above-described method for establishing a VPN is connection-proxying based, it allows application data to be transferred in a manner that is also more compatible with Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) policies, caching, compression, switching, multiplexing of connections, protection from SYN floods and other forms of attacks, and split tunneling than conventional VPN approaches. To illustrate the benefit of carrying out connection-proxying based VPN as described in the prior paragraph, the above-described method in which any additional processing of such connection that may be carried out at the gateway, including each of the methods described in the preceding paragraph, can be simply and efficiently carried out because the gateway serves as a proxy endpoint for the encrypted session. More specifically, in an embodiment, the gateway is able to carry out one or more forms of such processing as the gateway in the above-described method has terminated the connection and therefore such gateway can simply access and manipulate the TCP payload to perform such processing. By contrast, other approaches, including the connection tunneling approach, do not as a matter of course terminate the connection at the gateway (rather they proxy only the encrypted tunnel session) and therefore the approach requires a second level of processing to terminate the TCP connection that is tunneled inside the encrypted session. As a result of the requirement that the gateway carry out further processing on the connection, these approaches are inherently more complex and tend to be less efficient in carrying out additional functional processing on any such connection at the gateway.
Finally, in an embodiment, the integration of the VPN features of the present invention can be extended by synchronizing the processing of the SSL decryption and end point processing described above with other processing of the connections to be carried out at the gateway including those described above such as load balancing, HTTP dynamic application caching, HTTP compression, TCP compression, defense against TCP and HTTP distributed denial of service attacks, HTTP virus defense scanning, and the like.
In addition to the processing efficiencies described above, an embodiment of the present invention creates a separate TCP connection for each connection with the client or client control and terminates each such connection separately at the gateway and therefore provides the ability to simply and efficiently sequence the additional processing on each such connection.
In other approaches, including the connection tunneling approach, the gateway faces additional processing issues as previously described in the preceding paragraphs relating to the additional connection processing that must be carried out in contrast to the more efficient approaches of the present invention. Because multiple applications may be tunneled through a single encrypted session tunnel under this less efficient approach, the processing of the internal TCP connections at the gateway becomes more complex and less economical in its use of gateway processor resources. In this way, an embodiment of the invention improves the efficiency of integrating the processing at the gateway of the encryption session with other forms of processing.
Although the above-described methods are described in reference to embodiments in which communication is initiated by a client, the present invention also encompasses an embodiment in which communication is initiated by an entity on private data communication network 106. In accordance with such an embodiment, gateway 108 acts as a virtual client and entities on private communication network 106, such as servers 110a-110n, initiate communication with applications resident on any of clients 102a-102n. In such an embodiment, the VPN session is established in the same manner described above in reference to
The functions of the present invention as respectively performed by each of clients 102a-102n, servers 110a-110n, and gateway 108n may be implemented using hardware, software, or a combination thereof and may be implemented in one or more computer systems or other processing systems. For example,
As shown in
Computer system 400 further includes a main memory 408, such as a random access memory (RAM), and a secondary memory 410. The secondary memory 410 may include, for example, a hard disk drive 412 and/or a removable storage drive 414, which may comprise a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, or the like. The removable storage drive 414 reads from and/or writes to a removable storage unit 418 in a well known manner. Removable storage unit 418 may comprise a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, or the like, which is read by and written to by removable storage drive 414. As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the relevant art(s), the removable storage unit 418 includes a computer usable storage medium having stored therein computer software and/or data.
In alternative embodiments, secondary memory 410 may include other similar means for allowing computer programs or other instructions to be loaded into computer system 400. Such means can include, for example, a removable storage unit 422 and an interface 420. Examples of a removable storage unit 422 and interface 420 include a program cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in video game console devices), a removable memory chip (such as an EPROM, or PROM) and associated socket, and other removable storage units 422 and interfaces 420 which allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit 422 to computer system 400.
Computer system 400 further includes a display interface 402 that forwards graphics, text, and other data from the communication infrastructure 406 or from a frame buffer (riot shown) for display to a user on a display unit 430.
Computer system 400 also includes at least one communication interface 424. Communication interface 424 allows software and data to be transferred between computer system 400 and external devices via a communication path 426. In embodiments of the present invention, the communication interface 424 permits data to be transferred between the computer system 400 and a data communication network, such as public data communication network 104 or private data communication network 106. Examples of communications interface 424 can include a modem, a network interface (such as Ethernet card), a communications port, and the like. Software and data transferred via communications interface 424 are in the form of signals which can be electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by communications interface 424. These signals are provided to the communications interface via the communication path 426.
As used herein, the term “computer program product” may refer, in part, to removable storage unit 418, removable storage unit 422, a hard disk installed in hard disk drive 412, or a carrier wave carrying software over a communication path 426 (wireless link or cable) to communication interface 424. A computer useable medium can include magnetic media, optical media, or other recordable media, or media that transmits a carrier wave or other signal. These computer program products are means for providing software to computer system 400.
Computer programs (also called computer control logic) are stored in main memory 408 and/or secondary memory 410. Computer programs can also be received via communications interface 424. Such computer programs, when executed, enable the computer system 400 to perform one or more features of the present invention as discussed herein. In particular, the computer programs, when executed, enable the processor 404 to perform features of the present invention. Accordingly, such computer programs represent controllers of the computer system 400.
The present invention can be implemented as control logic in software, firmware, hardware or any combination thereof. In an embodiment where the invention is implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program product and loaded into computer system 400 using removable storage drive 414, hard disk drive 412, or interface 420. Alternatively, the computer program product may be downloaded to computer system 400 over communications path 426. The software, when executed by the processor 404, causes the processor 404 to perform functions of the invention as described herein.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, it will be understood by those skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/794,446 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK”, filed Jun. 4, 2010, which claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/039,946, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK”, filed Jan. 24, 2005, which claims priority to and is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/583,785, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK”, filed Jun. 30, 2004, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4479195 | Herr et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4701844 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4885680 | Anthony et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4935870 | Burk et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5301270 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307413 | Denzer | Apr 1994 | A |
5329619 | Page et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5359712 | Cohen et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5511208 | Boyles et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519699 | Ohsawa | May 1996 | A |
5521940 | Lane et al. | May 1996 | A |
5561769 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5623492 | Teraslinna | Apr 1997 | A |
5625793 | Mirza | Apr 1997 | A |
5657390 | Elgamal et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5671226 | Murakami et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5708656 | Noneman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742829 | Davis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758085 | Kouoheris et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758110 | Boss et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761431 | Gross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787470 | DeSimone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812668 | Weber | Sep 1998 | A |
5815462 | Konishi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819020 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822524 | Chen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828840 | Cowan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835726 | Shwed et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838920 | Rosborough | Nov 1998 | A |
5850446 | Berger et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852717 | Bhide et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864837 | Maimone | Jan 1999 | A |
5881229 | Singh et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889863 | Weber | Mar 1999 | A |
5893150 | Hagersten et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911051 | Carson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918244 | Percival | Jun 1999 | A |
5925100 | Drewry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931917 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5931961 | Ranganathan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933605 | Kawano et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940074 | Britt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943424 | Berger et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956483 | Grate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958016 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978840 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983208 | Haller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987132 | Rowney | Nov 1999 | A |
5987482 | Bates et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
5995999 | Bharadhwaj | Nov 1999 | A |
5996076 | Rowney et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999179 | Kekic et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002767 | Kramer | Dec 1999 | A |
6021470 | Frank et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023724 | Bhatia et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026379 | Haller et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026413 | Challenger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029175 | Chow et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058250 | Harwood et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061715 | Hawes | May 2000 | A |
6061769 | Kapulka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061796 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067569 | Khaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072870 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092155 | Olnowich | Jul 2000 | A |
6101543 | Alden et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112085 | Garner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119105 | Williams | Sep 2000 | A |
6119151 | Cantrell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122403 | Rhoads | Sep 2000 | A |
6128627 | Mattis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131120 | Reid | Oct 2000 | A |
6141686 | Jackowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144775 | Williams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161123 | Renouard et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163772 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170017 | Dias et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173325 | Kukreja | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175869 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178409 | Weber et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182139 | Brendel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192408 | Vahalia et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219669 | Haff et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233249 | Katseff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233606 | Dujari | May 2001 | B1 |
6233619 | Narisi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236652 | Preston et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252851 | Siu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253027 | Weber et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253188 | Witek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253327 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256773 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272146 | Bowater et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272148 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272556 | Gish | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282172 | Robles et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289450 | Pensak et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301249 | Mansfield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304915 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308273 | Goertzel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321235 | Bird | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321337 | Reshef et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324525 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324582 | Sridhar et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324647 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324648 | Grantges, Jr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327242 | Amicangioli et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334664 | Silverbrook | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339832 | Bowman-Amuah | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345239 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363363 | Haller et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363478 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370573 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370599 | Anand et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373950 | Rowney | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383478 | Prokop et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389462 | Cohen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389505 | Emma et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398359 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405364 | Bowman-Amuah | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412000 | Riddle et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415329 | Gelman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425057 | Cherkasova et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427132 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427187 | Malcolm | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6431777 | Silverbrook | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434568 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434618 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434628 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438127 | Le Goff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442571 | Haff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442682 | Pothapragada et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447113 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449658 | Lafe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449695 | Bereznyi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452923 | Gerszberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473802 | Masters | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6477580 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477665 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484143 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484206 | Crump et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6487641 | Cusson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496481 | Wu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496776 | Blumberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496850 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496935 | Fink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502102 | Haswell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502192 | Nguyen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502213 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507891 | Challenger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523027 | Underwood | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529909 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529948 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536037 | Guheen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539396 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549949 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550012 | Villa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550057 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553129 | Rhoads | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553377 | Eschelbeck et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553409 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571282 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2003 | B1 |
6574668 | Gubbi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574688 | Dale et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578068 | Bowman-Amuah | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578073 | Starnes et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584569 | Reshef et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590588 | Lincke et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591266 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594690 | Cantwell | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598075 | Ogdon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601057 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601192 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606660 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606663 | Liao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609128 | Underwood | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611262 | Suzuki | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611522 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611822 | Beams et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611867 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614800 | Genty et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615166 | Guheen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615199 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615253 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618359 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629081 | Cornelius et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631986 | Silverbrook | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633574 | Koch et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633878 | Underwood | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636242 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640238 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640240 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640244 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640248 | Jorgensen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640249 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647130 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652089 | Silverbrook | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652090 | Silverbrook | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662221 | Gonda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662357 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664978 | Kekic et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671818 | Mikurak | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678734 | Haatainen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681029 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687732 | Bector et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691227 | Neves et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697824 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697844 | Chan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697849 | Carlson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700902 | Meyer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701345 | Carley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701514 | Haswell et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704873 | Underwood | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715037 | Malcolm | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715145 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718535 | Underwood | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721713 | Guheen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728787 | Leigh | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732269 | Baskey et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732314 | Borella et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735601 | Subrahmanyam | May 2004 | B1 |
6735691 | Capps et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742015 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2004 | B1 |
6744774 | Sharma | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754699 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760748 | Hakim | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766373 | Beadle et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772203 | Feiertag et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775392 | Rhoads | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785719 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788315 | Kekic et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6789170 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792615 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801927 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6802020 | Smith | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807607 | Lamparter | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6820125 | Dias et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820133 | Grove et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820974 | Silverbrook | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823374 | Kausik et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826626 | McManus | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826627 | Sjollema et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831898 | Edsall et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842906 | Bowman-Amuah | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847892 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870921 | Elsey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873988 | Herrmann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880086 | Kidder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883068 | Tsirigotis et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888927 | Cruickshank et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6894981 | Coile et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6899420 | Silverbrook | May 2005 | B2 |
6901072 | Wong | May 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6904519 | Anand et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907546 | Haswell et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6910074 | Amin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912522 | Edgar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918113 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918665 | Silverbrook | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920502 | Araujo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925495 | Hegde et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934288 | Dempo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935736 | Silverbrook | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944279 | Elsey et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954736 | Menninger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954877 | Earl et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957186 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957249 | Salo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959320 | Shah et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974928 | Bloom | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980962 | Arganbright et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990070 | Aweya et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990480 | Burt | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993016 | Liva et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996628 | Keane et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6996631 | Aiken et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7000012 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007092 | Peiffer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007103 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010300 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013290 | Ananian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016055 | Dodge et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020719 | Grove et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023979 | Wu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024452 | O'Connell et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7026954 | Slemmer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027055 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028083 | Levine et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028333 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7028334 | Tuomenoksa | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031314 | Craig et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034691 | Rapaport et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035427 | Rhoads | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036142 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039606 | Hoffman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7039708 | Knobl et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7042879 | Eschbach et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043529 | Simonoff | May 2006 | B1 |
7047279 | Beams et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7047424 | Bendinelli et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051161 | Dixit et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051316 | Charisius et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054837 | Hoffman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054944 | Tang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055028 | Peiffer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055169 | Delpuch et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055947 | Silverbrook | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7057759 | Lapstun et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069234 | Cornelius et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7070110 | Lapstun et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072665 | Blumberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7072843 | Menninger et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072965 | Ryuutou et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080041 | Nagel | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082409 | Cherry | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085683 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085834 | Delany et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085854 | Keane et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086728 | Silverbrook | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092370 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096009 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096418 | Singhal et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096495 | Warrier et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7097106 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103068 | Gardner et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107285 | Von Kaenel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113779 | Fujisaki | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113962 | Kee et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114180 | DeCaprio | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117530 | Lin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120596 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120666 | McCanne et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120690 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120852 | Terry et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124101 | Mikurak | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124442 | Nash-Putnam | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126955 | Nabhan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128265 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128270 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130792 | Tokieda et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130807 | Mikurak | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7131596 | Lapstun et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7134131 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7135991 | Slemmer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136645 | Hanson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137566 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139999 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140044 | Redlich et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143153 | Black et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7144095 | Silverbrook | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146384 | Sawafta | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146644 | Redlich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149698 | Guheen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149897 | Chincheck et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149959 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7150398 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152047 | Nagel | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152092 | Beams et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152207 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155518 | Forslow | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155676 | Land et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159014 | Kausik et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159777 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162540 | Jasen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164680 | Loguinov | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165041 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167844 | Leong et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171379 | Menninger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175089 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178106 | Lamkin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178719 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181766 | Bendinelli et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184445 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187470 | Lapstun et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188273 | Allen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188769 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191252 | Redlich et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194761 | Champagne | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197374 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197502 | Feinsmith | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197570 | Eylon et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197602 | Malcolm | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197751 | Fedotov et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199885 | Dodge | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7200804 | Khavari et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206811 | Skurikhin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207483 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207485 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212296 | Dodge et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216173 | Clayton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219127 | Huck et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221660 | Simonson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222152 | Thompson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222305 | Teplov et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225040 | Eller et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225244 | Reynolds et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225382 | Ramech et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228459 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246233 | Brabson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260617 | Bazinet et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260840 | Swander et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263071 | Yim | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272853 | Goodman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284044 | Teraoaka et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318100 | Demmer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321906 | Green | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328267 | Bashyam et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340772 | Panasyuk et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353533 | Wright et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363347 | Thomas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363378 | Holmes et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370353 | Yang | May 2008 | B2 |
7386631 | Sibal et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389462 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392348 | Dumont | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398320 | Minakuchi et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7398552 | Pardee et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401116 | Chalfin et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7404003 | Noble | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7406533 | Li et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409708 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415723 | Pandya | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420992 | Fang et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7433314 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441119 | Brabson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458095 | Forsberg | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464264 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480312 | Ossman | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496659 | Coverdill et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7505455 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7512702 | Srivastava et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7522581 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533409 | Keane et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536715 | Markham | May 2009 | B2 |
7577144 | Chang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606902 | Rao et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609721 | Rao et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644188 | Vlodavsky et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7673048 | O'Toole et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7757074 | Sundarrajan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775074 | Tobias et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7882247 | Sturniolo et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7921184 | Sundarrajan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945678 | Skene | May 2011 | B1 |
7979528 | Eisenberg et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7979694 | Touitou et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8005981 | Tuck et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8205000 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8223647 | Kakani et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8261057 | Sundarrajan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8351327 | Binns | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8495305 | Sundarrajan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20010030970 | Wiryaman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037387 | Gilde et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043600 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046212 | Nakajima | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047406 | Araujo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049717 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052016 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052065 | Alexander, III et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004834 | Guenther et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004902 | Toh et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007402 | Thomas Huston et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007404 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016827 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023210 | Tuomenoksa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026478 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026531 | Keane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029285 | Collins | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032725 | Araujo et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032798 | Xu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035451 | Rothermel | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035596 | Yang et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038339 | Xu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042875 | Shukla | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049608 | Hartsell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049841 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055966 | Border et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057717 | Mallory | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059274 | Hartsell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059429 | Carpenter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059435 | Border et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065864 | Hartsell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065919 | Taylor et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069278 | Forslow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020071438 | Singh | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073061 | Collins | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073298 | Geiger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081971 | Travostino | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083175 | Afek et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083183 | Pujare et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087729 | Edgar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091788 | Chlan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095400 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095498 | Chanda et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098840 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099940 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101848 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020101860 | Thornton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105972 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107903 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107962 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107971 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107989 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107990 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108059 | Canion et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116452 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116582 | Copeland et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120743 | Shabtay et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126675 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133593 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138511 | Psounis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138572 | Delany et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138618 | Szabo | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138640 | Raz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147795 | Cantwell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147822 | Susai et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150064 | Lucidarme | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152373 | Sun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152423 | McCabe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156927 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161908 | Benitez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163882 | Bornstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174227 | Hartsell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174255 | Hayter et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176532 | McClelland et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184224 | Haff et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194382 | Kausik et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196279 | Bloomfield et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199007 | Clayton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009538 | Shah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014623 | Freed et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014624 | Maturana et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014625 | Freed et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014628 | Freed et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014650 | Freed et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018891 | Hall et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023767 | Brabson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026241 | Ono et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033520 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039354 | Kimble et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046586 | Bheemarasetti et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046587 | Bheemarasetti et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051100 | Patel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051102 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055883 | Wiles, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055962 | Freund et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061505 | Sperry et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065763 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067874 | See et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069941 | Peiffer | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079031 | Nagano | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084162 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084165 | Kjellberg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088698 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088788 | Yang | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093566 | Jardin | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105604 | Ash et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105977 | Brabson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110296 | Kirsch et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110379 | Ylonen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112809 | Bharali et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112823 | Collins et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115421 | McHenry et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123394 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123481 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131079 | Neale et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131263 | Keane et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140121 | Adams | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149899 | Boden et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152028 | Raisanen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154110 | Walter et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154239 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165138 | Swonk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167403 | McCurley et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174718 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177389 | Albert et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177395 | Pardee et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182423 | Shafir et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182431 | Sturniolo et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182437 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188001 | Eisenberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191799 | Araujo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191812 | Agarwalla et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198189 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200295 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200353 | Dogra et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208602 | Bhalla et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212760 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212776 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217105 | Zircher et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217126 | Polcha et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217149 | Crichton et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223361 | Hussain et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223418 | Desai et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223433 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226018 | Tardo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229718 | Tock et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229761 | Basu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233423 | Dilley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236831 | Ortiz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236837 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236861 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236919 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003101 | Roth et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003137 | Callender et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006708 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008693 | Grove et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010601 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010604 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034744 | Karlsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034794 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039827 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042487 | Ossman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044521 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044731 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049515 | Haff et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073716 | Boom et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078621 | Talaugon et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078772 | Balay et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087304 | Buddhikot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098486 | Gu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100976 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103150 | Ogdon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103225 | McAlpine et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103438 | Yan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107360 | Herrmann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111519 | Fu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128252 | Shirai et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128346 | Melamed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141525 | Bhushan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143655 | Narad et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143734 | Buer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146053 | Nabhan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177158 | Bauch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177359 | Bauch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190092 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202171 | Hama | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203296 | Moreton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205439 | Carmeli et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210320 | Pandya | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213248 | Okuda et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215665 | Edgar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215746 | McCanne et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221031 | Desai | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225898 | Frost et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225911 | Smith | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246971 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249911 | Alkhatib et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249975 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258003 | Kokot et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260922 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268175 | Koch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268357 | Joy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268358 | Darling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005014 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005107 | Touboul | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013280 | Buddhikot et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021762 | Gbadegesin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022011 | Swander et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022012 | Bluestone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022031 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025150 | Helmy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027788 | Koopmans et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031058 | Soong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033858 | Swildens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033926 | Dumont | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044350 | White et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050317 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055690 | Cornillon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058112 | Lahey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080850 | Salesky et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080907 | Panasyuk et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102529 | Buddhikot et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108412 | Sjollema et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108517 | Dillon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122980 | Anand et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125663 | Funk | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132030 | Hopen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132060 | Mo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135250 | Singh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144186 | Hesselink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144481 | Hopen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147126 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149481 | Hesselink et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149726 | Joshi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165928 | Shu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177866 | Kirsch | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185647 | Rao et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193075 | Haff et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195780 | Haverinen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198380 | Panasyuk et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198532 | Comlekoglu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210150 | Bahl | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223084 | Cheng | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223412 | Nadalin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232161 | Maufer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232298 | Beverly et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246346 | Gerdes et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246445 | Panasyuk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256923 | Adachi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259634 | Ross | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262357 | Araujo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265315 | Edgar | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050265353 | Sengupta et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267974 | Panasyuk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286466 | Tagg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005240 | Sundarrajan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015570 | Khemani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018332 | Kakani et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031547 | Tsui et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034283 | Ko et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041635 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053164 | Ewing et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053253 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059370 | Asnis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064500 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069719 | McCanne et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080441 | Chen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089996 | Peiffer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112185 | Van Bemmel | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123477 | Raghavan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129689 | Ho et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133405 | Fee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142878 | Banik et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185010 | Sultan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225130 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245414 | Susai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271652 | Stavrakos et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274828 | Siemens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008883 | Kobayashi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061067 | Zeinstra et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067366 | Landis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110046 | Farrell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130324 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130334 | Carley | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156852 | Sundarrajan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169179 | Narad | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179955 | Croft et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192827 | Maxted et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206621 | Plamondon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233910 | Paley et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245409 | Harris et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080034416 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046616 | Verzunov et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049786 | Ram et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071915 | Gbadegesin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080225720 | Khemani et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225748 | Khemani et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225753 | Khemani et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229381 | Sikka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080320151 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090133015 | Nagashima | May 2009 | A1 |
20100241846 | Sundarrajan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1394042 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1410905 | Apr 2003 | CN |
0 436 365 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0 618 708 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 838 930 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1 045 553 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 134 942 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 427 133 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 432 209 | Jun 2004 | EP |
07-302237 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-006910 | Jan 1996 | JP |
10-178450 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2002-532784 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-084289 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004-078783 | Mar 2004 | JP |
WO-9904343 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-0034885 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0147185 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-0213037 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-0223362 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0239301 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-02069604 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-03019876 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03026244 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03048936 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03083692 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03083692 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004088933 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004114529 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005013534 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005024567 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005048106 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005088476 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006005078 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2006012612 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006020823 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006074072 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006075219 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2008112691 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2008112698 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,656 dated Jul. 29, 2009. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Nov. 23, 2010. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Nov. 16, 2009. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Dec. 14, 2009. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946 dated Mar. 24, 2009. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated May 6, 2009. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,092 dated Apr. 24, 2009. |
Biagioni et al., Signature for a network Protocol Stack: A System Application of Standard ML, Jul. 1994. |
Canadian Office Action for CA appl. 2545496 dated Feb. 15, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action on 200580028535.9 dated Dec. 13, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action on 201110076025.6 dated Oct. 26, 2011. |
Dictionary service [online], [retrieved on Jul. 23, 2009]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discard>. |
Doug Allen, Layer-7 Load Balancers Pack New Punch, CMP Media LLC Network Magazine, Sep. 2003. |
EP Communication for EP Patent Application No. 07007414.1 dated Jun. 5, 2008. (6 pages). |
EP Communication for European Patent Application No. 05776653.7 dated Oct. 5, 2007. (7 pages). |
EP Communication from EP Patent Application No. 05 785 297.2, dated May 18, 2007, 2 pages. |
EP Search Report for EP appl. 10184310.0 dated Dec. 9, 2010. |
EP Search Report for EP appl. 10184317.5 dated Dec. 7, 2010. |
EP Summons to Oral Proceedings for EP appl. 05776653.7 dated Jan. 14, 2011. |
European Communication on 05776653.7 dated Jun. 24, 2011. |
European Communication on 05855922.0 dated Nov. 24, 2011. |
European Exam Report on 07007414.1 dated Aug. 11, 2011. |
European Exam Report on 10184310.0 dated Aug. 11, 2011. |
European Examination Report on 05774886.5 dated Nov. 24, 2011. |
European Examination Report on 05855924.6 dated Nov. 24, 2011. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. EP 07007414 dated Jul. 16, 2007. (2 pages). |
European Supplemental Search Report on 05763688.8 dated Dec. 1, 2011. |
Exam report for EP appl. 05785297.2 dated Jun. 19, 2009. |
Exam Report for EP appl. 070074141 dated Nov. 17, 2009. |
Exam Report for EP appln 05776653.7 dated Apr. 20, 2009. |
Hasegawa et al., “A Mechanism for TCP Performance Enhancement over Assymetrical Environment,” Proceedings 8th IEEE ISCC'03, 1530-1346/03, 2003. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/023914, mailing date May 7, 2007. 2 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/026300, Mailing date: Dec. 16, 2005. 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/028663, Mailing date: Nov. 16, 2005. 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/047433 dated Jul. 12, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/066433. Mailing date Oct. 31, 2007, p. 1-4. |
International Search Report to PCT/US04/37918, mailed on Apr. 27, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report to PCT/US2005/026296, mailed on Jan. 31, 2006, 5 pgs. |
Ipswitch Inc., WSFTP User's Guide, Chapter 8: Security, Jun. 25, 2003, 8 pages. |
J. C. Mogul, “The Case for Persistent-Connection HTTP,” 8282 Computer Communication Review 25, Oct. 1995. |
Japanese Office Action for JP appl. 2007-519353 dated Jul. 16, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action for JP appl. 2007-522843 dated Dec. 1, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action on 2007-48001 dated Oct. 29, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action on 2007-48003 dated Nov. 8, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action on 2007-552147 dated Jun. 30, 2011. |
Kong, et al; “Pseudo-serving: a user-responsible paradigm for internet access”; Apr. 7-11, 1997; SO Computer Networks and ISDN Systems; vol. 29; pp. 1053-1064. |
Korean Office Action for KR appl. 2006-7009144 dated Jan. 14, 2011. |
Krishnamurthy B.C. et al., “Key differences between HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1,” Computer Networks, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., vol. 31, No. 11-16, pp. 1737-1751, May 1999. |
Lazenka, M. “The Evolution of Software Distribution: Where Did We Come From and Where Are We Heading?”, 2005, ACM, p. 179-183. |
Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,004. 6 pages. |
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,562. 15 pages. |
Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,656. 21 pages. |
Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,279. 12 pages. |
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 25 pages. |
Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2007 pertaining to U.S Appl. No. 10/683,881. 10 pages. |
Noriaki Kobayashi, “Internet VPN”, N+1 Network Guide, vol. 3, No. 9, Oct. 1, 2003, pp. 44-49. (9 pages) (English Abstract). |
Notice of Acceptance for AU 2010214746 dated Nov. 2, 2010. |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Appl. 2005266943 dated May 28, 2010. (3 pages). |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Appl. 2005272779 dated May 26, 2010. (3 pages). |
Notice of allowance dated Jun. 17, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,279. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2008. U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,004 5 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 dated Mar. 4, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,795 dated Mar. 2, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,092 dated Jun. 11, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Jun. 23, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946 dated Mar. 5, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,656 dated Sep. 18, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/557,497 dated May 6, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/560,154 dated May 2, 2011. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Japanese Application No. 2007-549641 dated May 17, 2011. |
Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 (29 pages). |
Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2008. U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091. |
Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,092. |
Office Action for AU appl. 2005266943 dated May 14, 2009. |
Office Action for AU appl. 2005272779 dated Apr. 23, 2009. |
Office Action for CN App. No. 200580048867.3 dated Sep. 26, 2010. |
Office Action for CN App. No. 200580048867.3 dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
Office Action for CN Appl. 20050034849X dated Aug. 3, 2010. |
Office Action for CN Appl. 200580030928.3 dated Apr. 23, 2010.(5 pages). |
Office Action for CN appl. 200580034849.X dated Sep. 25, 2009. |
Office Action for CN appln 00480040249.X dated Jun. 19, 2009. |
Office Action for CN appln 200580028535 dated Jan. 15, 2010. |
Office Action for CN appln 200580034849X dated Apr. 7, 2010. |
Office Action for CN Appln 200580048867.3 dated Mar. 11, 2011. |
Office Action for IL Application No. 180402 dated Dec. 15, 2010. |
Office Action for IL Application No. 180405 dated Jan. 2, 2011. |
Office Action for IL Application No. 180891 dated Jan. 4, 2011. |
Office Action for IL application No. 18169 dated Jan. 2, 2011. |
Office Action for IN Appl. 1514KOLNP2006 dated Sep. 7, 2010 (3 pages). |
Office Action for JP App. No. 2007-48001 dated Apr. 29, 2010. |
Office Action for JP appl. 2006-539930 dated Feb. 18, 2010. |
Office Action for JP Appl. 2007-519353 dated Jul. 12, 2010. (6 pages) (English Abstract). |
Office Action for JP Appl. 2007-522841 dated Sep. 10, 2010. (9 pages) (English Abstract). |
Office Action for JP Appl. 2007-525810 dated Aug. 4, 2010. (9 pages) (English Abstract). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Oct. 1, 2010. (10 pages). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Jun. 22, 2010. (20 pages). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274 dated Mar. 29, 2010. (15 pages). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946 mailed on Jun. 23, 2008, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,092 dated Feb. 12, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274 dated Sep. 8, 2010. (19 pages). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Jun. 19, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Apr. 5, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Sep. 15, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Oct. 3, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Dec. 7, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Nov. 30, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Apr. 30, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Nov. 3, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Oct. 6, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Mar. 7, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Apr. 2, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated May 27, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,795 dated Dec. 16, 2010. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 dated Jun. 10, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Sep. 2, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946 dated Jan. 23, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946 dated Jun. 23, 2009. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 dated Jan. 6, 2010. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 dated May 28, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Jan. 2, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Feb. 22, 2010. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Feb. 18, 2009. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Feb. 24, 2010. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Aug. 3, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Mar. 3, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Sep. 15, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,562 dated Apr. 27, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,656 dated May 13, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512 dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Oct. 5, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Nov. 3, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Jun. 28, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274 dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274 dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Jan. 4, 2012. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,131 dated Aug. 11, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/557,497 dated Nov. 18, 2010. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,246 dated Sep. 27, 2011. |
Official Notification from Israeli Patent Office, for Appl No. 184750 mailed Apr. 7, 2011. |
Pedro Hernandez, “Tacit Adds to Softricity's Spark”, Nov. 18, 2005. Available online at: www.enterpriseitplant.com/networking/news/article.php/3565401. |
R. Briscoe, “The Implications of Pervasive Computing on Network Design,” BT Technology Journal, pp. 170-190, Jul. 2004. |
Ranzau et al., “Softricity/Tacit, An Innovative Approach to Virtual Computing,” http://www.daboc.com/downloadnow.aspx?file=211&is=617, Oct. 20, 2005. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Jul. 26, 2010.(9 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP04810901 dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
Teruhara Serada, “SSL VPN”, N+1 Network LAN, vol. 21, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, pp. 25-40. (19 pages) (English Abstract). |
Wang et al., Shield: Vulnerability-Driven Network Filters for Preventing Known Vulnerability Exploits, Feb. 2004, Microsoft Research, MSR-TR-2003-81. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2005/023914 dated May 7, 2007. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2005/047433 dated Jun. 30, 2007. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority to PCT/US04/37918, mailed on Apr. 27, 2005, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority to PCT/US2005/026296, mailed on Jan. 31, 2006. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority to PCT/US2005/026300; Mailed on Dec. 16, 2005, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority to PCT/US2005/028663; Mailed on Nov. 16, 2005, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2007/066433, mailed Oct. 31, 2007. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2005/022884, mailed on Jul. 8, 2008 (6 pages). |
Yoshikazu Kobayashi, VPN service introduction, Computer & Network LAN, vol. 21, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, pp. 25-40. (19 pages) (English Abstract). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/560,154 dated Feb. 4, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/560,154 dated Sep. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,004, filed Nov. 12, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,092, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,946, filed Jan. 24, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,656, filed Aug. 11, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,562, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,279, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,512, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,513, filed Jul. 22, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,795, filed Dec. 17, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/557,497, filed Sep. 10, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/560,154, filed Sep. 15, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,231, filed May 25, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,446, filed Jun. 4, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,383, filed May 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,895, filed Jan. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,180, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,246, filed Aug. 30, 2010. |
“Cisco Distributed Director,” Posted Feb. 21, 1997, 16 pages, [Online] [Retrieved on Dec. 4, 1997] Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.cisco.com/wart/public/751/distdir/dd—wp.htm>. |
EP Search Report issued Jul. 28, 2011 in European Application No. 04810901.1. |
European Communication on 05763688.8 dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Exam Report for AU App. No. 2005272779 dated May 14, 2009. |
Examination Report issued May 17, 2013 in Indian Patent Application No. 648/KOLNP/2007. |
Examination Report on 3929/KOLNP/2006 dated Nov. 30, 2012. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,279. 12 pages. |
Hu, et al., Adaptive Fast Path Architecture, IBM J. Res & Dev, vol. 45, Mar. 1, 2001, pp. 191-206. Retrieved from: http://gec.di.uminho.pt/discip/minf/ac0203/ICCA03IBM—WebCachArch.pdf. |
Indian Examination Report on 3959/KOLNP/2006 dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
Indian Examination Report on 531/KOLNP/2007 dated Feb. 8, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/022884 dated Jul. 8, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,246 mailed Feb. 24, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,279 dated Jun. 29, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance in EP App 05785297.2 dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Jun. 18, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,446 dated May 7, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,246 dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/188,274 (15 pages). |
Office Action for CN App. No. 200480040249.X dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
Office action for European Application No. 05776653.7 dated Oct. 5, 2007. 7 Pages. |
Office Action for IL App. No. 180403 dated Dec. 15, 2010. |
Office Action for JP Appl. 2007-048002 dated Nov. 8, 2010. (7 pages) (English Abstract). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,090 dated Feb. 4, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,091 dated Aug. 5, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/161,093 dated Oct. 1, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,562 dated Dec. 9, 2008. |
Office Action issued Apr. 8, 2013 in European Patent Application No. 04810901.1. |
Office Action issued Jan. 2, 2001 in Israeli Patent Application No. 181269. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/557,497 dated Nov. 19, 2010. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,231 dated Apr. 11, 2013. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,446 dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/871,246 dated May 15, 2012. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,895 dated Mar. 13, 2013. |
US Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,383 DTD May 28, 2013. |
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,383 DTD Jan. 29, 2013. |
US Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/187,508 DTD May 30, 2013. |
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,895 dated Mar. 24, 2014. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,927 dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/558,001 dated Jan. 13, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120317411 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60583785 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12794446 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13590630 | US | |
Parent | 11039946 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12794446 | US |