For a long time now the infrastructure represented by telecommunication networks has been growing rapidly while at the same time these networks have become more versatile and technologically more advanced. The old fixed analog telephone network has been replaced by a digital one. Mobile networks have been set up to complement the fixed telephone network, enabling the use of wireless terminals with little geographical limitations. On the other hand, separate data networks have been built. These include a great number of local area networks (LAN) of private nature, and a plurality of public data networks. The most important of the public data networks is the global Internet through which a vast number of servers and other sites can be reached. One of the factors that make it so tempting to use the Internet for a variety of data transfer purposes, such as to transfer voice and picture signals, is that it is so inexpensive, i.e. the cost payable by the user per amount of data transferred is relatively small.
At the core of the so-called system architecture of the Internet there is a protocol pair called the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol). Transmission session is controlled at the transfer end points according to the TCP, and TCP data frames are fragmented into smaller “packets” and these packets are then routed through the network according to the IP. Routing is generally based on network addresses of terminals, these addresses being global IP addresses in the case of the Internet. On the basis of a plain-text receiver address given by the user, the sending terminal is able to get a corresponding IP address from a server set up especially for this purpose and to attach that IP address to the data packets to be sent. If the recipient is at a usual location such as home or office, no problems usually occur with the transfer. The situation becomes more complicated if the recipient is moving. Even if he were close to a machine interfaced with the Internet, the transfer could not be completed if the sender did not know the network address for the machine in question. The sender cannot even know whether the recipient can be reached or not. It is conceivable that the sender first calls the recipient on his mobile phone to inquire about this, but this is a clumsy way and, moreover, incurs phone costs. Furthermore, the recipient's mobile phone may be switched off or the recipient may not have a mobile phone to begin with.
Publication WO 9816045 discloses a system which alleviates the problem mentioned above.
So the idea of the system disclosed in publication WO 9816045 is to make it easier for persons belonging to the same circle of acquaintances, for example, to establish connections between them. To that end, the server keeps a register for the group associations, personal data and online traffic data of the persons subscribing to the service. A drawback of the system is that a user must himself start, at the terminal computer, a software application according to the system and enter his personal identifier so as to register in on the server. Moreover, the user must actively observe his computer so as to be able to respond to a connection request. Another drawback is that communication is limited to the exchange of text messages and files, and the user is tied to the terminal computer for the duration of the connection.
Publication WO 0165821 discloses a system employing a data network, involving portable devices such as laptop computers in the vicinity of network terminals. A portable device is equipped with a small-range radio device and software required by the system in question. The portable device repeatedly sends out a reporting message. When it comes close to a data network terminal, the latter detects the reporting message and sends to a data network server a registration request containing user-specific information that was included in the reporting message. This way the user's device is linked to the network. The system does not include any special connection establishing service.
The invention is below described in detail. Reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which
In the vicinity of the second terminal DTB there is person B with a second communication device MSB, in this example a terminal of a mobile communication network, in her pocket. In conjunction with the second terminal DTB there is a transceiver 23B which in this example is an external unit connected to the terminal computer by a cable. The second communication device MSB includes a transceiver 24B which together with the transceiver 23B in the second terminal and the radio path therebetween constitute a digital transfer system. In other respects, too, the arrangement is similar to that described above and related to the first terminal.
In the situation depicted by
During a connection between communication devices the transfer system between a communication device and a terminal monitors the quality of the communications link in question. This may be based, as is well known, on monitoring the level of the carrier or the signal-to-noise ratio; the same thing which the establishment of the connection is based on initially. In step 311 of
For a change of terminals the software at the server draws conclusions about the relative locations of terminals equipped with transceivers. In a simple case, the relative locations of two terminals relatively close to each other becomes apparent from that a communication device reports itself first via one terminal and then via the other when a network connection is active via the former. Location information can also be obtained in such a manner that terminals exchange messages for that particular purpose. When such an exchange of messages is successful, a terminal can send to a server according to the invention a message containing the identifiers of the parties, primarily the network addresses, and a parameter describing the quality of the link, for example. Based on such information, server software can outline a sort of “map” of terminals eligible for connection establishment. This map can then be used in traffic management so that the server is able to prepare probable and possible changes of terminals.
Above in conjunction with the description of
Examples of the system according to the invention were given above. The invention is not limited to those examples. A communication device may be any apparatus that has a unique identifier and a suitable transceiver. Such an apparatus may be e.g. a cordless telephone attached to a wireline extension. A transceiver may be an external component to a communication device associated therewith. Transceivers utilize Bluetooth technology, for example. They may also be in accordance with some other radio system, or the transfer system based on them may be an infrared link. A terminal may be a dedicated processor-based device or e.g. a PC workstation equipped with special hardware and software. A terminal may also be an apparatus in the category of entertainment electronics, such as a so-called set-top box for digital TV, equipped with a data network interface. Units participating in connection establishment can be equipped with programs utilizing known encryption methods in order to enhance information security. Furthermore, converted network addresses can be used instead of real ones. The way of conversion is known only to the server and the terminal in question. Moreover, the network address can be altered in a predetermined manner according to the time of the day, for example, so that potential tracking attempts by outsiders become even more difficult. The inventional idea can be applied in different ways within the scope defined by the independent claims 1 and 17.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20010297 | Feb 2001 | FI | national |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/084,695, filed Mar. 30, 2016, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/013,547 filed on Aug. 29, 2013, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/585,444 filed on Aug. 14, 2012, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,543,708, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/044,772 filed on Mar. 10, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,285,854, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/960,579 filed on Dec. 19, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,930,405, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/468,353 filed on Aug. 18, 2003, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,711,823, which is a U.S. National Stage Filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 from International Patent Application No. PCT/FI02/00133 filed on Feb. 18, 2002, and published as WO 02/073892 A1 on Sep. 19, 2002, which in turn claims the priority benefit of Finland Application No. 20010297 filed on Feb. 16, 2001, the entire content of each application being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4613990 | Halpern | Sep 1986 | A |
5351290 | Naeini et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5408469 | Opher et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5841469 | Freeman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862481 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6052591 | Bhatia | Apr 2000 | A |
6181935 | Gossman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6477157 | Kim | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493338 | Preston | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519252 | Sallberg | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6560216 | McNiff et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577611 | Tat et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6633761 | Singhai et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636508 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643253 | Smith | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6681259 | Lemilainen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6751297 | Nelkenbaum | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778529 | Field | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6857021 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6990082 | Zehavi et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7394811 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7502362 | Koskinen et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7711823 | Hukkanen | May 2010 | B2 |
7930405 | Hukkanen | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8285854 | Hukkanen | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8543708 | Hukkanen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8670405 | Lee | Mar 2014 | B1 |
9326228 | Hukkanen | Apr 2016 | B2 |
10057809 | Hukkanen | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20020196781 | Salovuori | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040105428 | Hukkanen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20080104254 | Hukkanen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20110225304 | Hukkanen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120309386 | Hukkanen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140003382 | Hukkanen | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20160212659 | Hukkanen | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1011278 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1011279 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1998016045 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9948312 | Sep 1999 | WO |
199948312 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0103392 | Jan 2001 | WO |
200103392 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0165821 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0167684 | Sep 2001 | WO |
200165821 | Sep 2001 | WO |
200167684 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2002073892 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002073892 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Response filed Oct. 15, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2008”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Response filed May 7, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2008”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Response filed Nov. 21, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2009”, 17 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Response filed May 5, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 14, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09180854.3, Search Report dated Mar. 1, 2010”, 5 Pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 18, 2003”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2007”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/960,579, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/960,579, Response filed Aug. 20, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09180854.3, European Search Report Response Sep. 28, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/960,579, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 9, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,772, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,772 , Response filed Aug. 29, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,722, Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,772, Response filed Apr. 26, 2012 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,772, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 12, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,444, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,444 , Response filed Feb. 11, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,444, Notice of Allowance dated May 24, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,547, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,547, Response filed Jul. 30, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,547, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 31, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 30, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Non Final Office Action dated May 26, 2016”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02700302.9, Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2007”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02700302.9, Response filed Jun. 7, 2007 to Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2007”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/960,579, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 13, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,547, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 3, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT FI02 00133, International Search Report filed Jun. 20, 2002”, 3pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT. FI02 00133, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 8, 2003”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Response filed Aug. 26, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated May 26, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695 Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Response filed Apr. 7, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Response filed Sep. 30, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Response filed Mar. 21, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,695, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 10, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, “Appeal Brief filed for U.S. Appl. No. 10/468,353, dated Dec. 4, 2009”, (dated Dec. 4, 2009), 28 pages. |
Handley, “Session Initiation Protocol”, RFC 2543: IETF, (Mar. 1999), 1-153. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180332504 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15084695 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16043576 | US | |
Parent | 14013547 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 15084695 | US | |
Parent | 13585444 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14013547 | US | |
Parent | 13044772 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13585444 | US | |
Parent | 11960579 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 13044772 | US | |
Parent | 10468353 | US | |
Child | 11960579 | US |