Patent Grant
11650958
This invention relates generally to computer systems, and more particularly to cloud file storage systems. Even more particularly, this invention relates to synchronizing a local file system and a remote cloud file system stored remotely.
Cloud computing systems are known. In cloud computing systems, computing and storage services are provided to remote clients over a wide area network such as the Internet. In the case of storage, a client's local files can be stored on the cloud and accessed by the client remotely.
Often a client's file system will exist both in the client's local storage device (e.g., a hard drive, network attached storage (NAS) device, etc.) and in the cloud. For example, a client might store a backup copy of its local file system in the cloud. Doing so is beneficial from the standpoint that the client has a backup copy of its file system. However, any benefit of the backup is negated as more and more changes are made to the local file system. Thus, it becomes a burden on the client to make sure the file system stored on the cloud is up to date. It is common for the file system on the cloud to be significantly older than the local file system, putting the local file system at risk if it is damaged.
In some cases, the client might also want to access its file system on the cloud. If changes to the cloud file system are made, then the cloud file system will become different from the local file system. As indicated above, problems arise when the local and cloud file systems become different.
What is needed, therefore, is a system and method that facilitates synchronizing a client's local file system with its file system on the cloud. What is also needed is a system and method that facilitates such synchronization in near real time. What is also needed is a system and method that facilitates such synchronization regardless of whether changes are made to the client's local file system or the associated cloud file system.
The present invention overcomes the problems associated with the prior art by providing a system and method for event-based, steady-state synchronization of local and remote (cloud) file systems. The invention facilitates near-real-time synchronization and conflict resolution of remote and local file systems so that each of the remote and local file system are up-to-date. The synchronization is bidirectional and is carried out whether changes are made to the remote file system or to the local file system. Thus, clients can maintain local and remote access to up-to-date data.
A method for synchronizing a file system (FS) and a remote file system (RFS) that is located remotely from the FS is disclosed. The method includes monitoring the FS for FS events, where each of the FS events is indicative of a change made to the FS, and generating a plurality of event records based on the FS events. The method further includes receiving a plurality of RFS event records indicative of remote events that changed the RFS, generating file system operations (FSOs) based in part on the event records and RFS event records, and then communicating the file system operations to the FS and RFS to synchronize the FS and RFS. The RFS event records can be received, and the file system operations can be provided to the RFS, via a connection established with a remote file storage system having access to the RFS. Additionally, the generating step can optionally be initiated after each event record is generated or according to an (optionally adjustable) event synchronization time period. Event records and RFS event records associated with events occurring during the event synchronization period will be used to generate file system operations. Methods also include initially synchronizing the FS and RFS prior to the step of monitoring for events. Monitoring the FS for changes can include monitoring calls to the FS from the client, and executing a trap that causes an event record to be generated each time a call change the FS.
A particular method also includes processing the event records and RFS event records to generate a set of processed event records such that the step of generating FSO's is based at least in part on the set of processed event records. Processing events can include identifying by type and modifying at least some of the event records of that type. Processing events can also include deleting some of the event records (or RFS event records). Sometimes the step of processing events also includes accessing an FS event record and an RFS event record related to a file system object common to both the FS and RFS, and resolving an event conflict between the first event record and the second RFS event record.
The methods can also include storing (e.g., chronologically) the event records in a first events database and storing (e.g., chronologically) the RFS event records in a second events database. The event records and RFS event records can also be retrieved from their respective databases chronologically and/or according to the hierarchies of the FS and RFS, respectively. Prior to the step of generating file system operations, some of the event records and some of the RFS event records can be copied to third and fourth (view) databases, respectively.
Another method for synchronizing an FS and an RFS includes the steps of monitoring the FS for events, generating an event record in response to the occurrence of each event, optionally receiving a request for event records, and transmitting the event records to a remote file storage system having access to the RFS.
A file storage system for use with a remote file storage system is also disclosed. The file storage system includes memory storing a file system (FS) with FS objects, a client interface for providing client access, a file system module that monitors for changes being made to the FS by the client and outputs event information about the changes, and a data monitor that generates event records based on the event information from the file system module. The server also includes a remote file server interface for communicating with the remote system, a synchronizer that receives RFS event records from the remote system, an event processor that generates FSOs based on the event records and RFS event records, and an output that can communicate the FSOs to the FS and RFS to synchronize the FS and RFS. Optionally, the FS and RFS can be initially synchronized. The file system module can monitor I/O calls going to the FS and execute a trap for each of the I/O calls, which results in an event record being generated. The event processor can generate FSOs responsive to each event record being generated or according to an event synchronization time period described above. The synchronizer can be further operative to request RFS event records from the remote server via the remote file server interface. The system can also include a sync action handler operative to cause (e.g., via APIs) some of the FSOs to be applied to the FS and others of the FSOs to be transmitted to the RFS for application.
The system can also include a first and second events database that store (e.g., chronologically) FS and RFS event records, respectively. Additionally, the first and second event databases are operative to return FS event records and RFS event records chronologically and/or according to the hierarchies of the FS and RFS, respectively. The system can also include third and fourth (view) databases. The data monitor can copy some of the event records from the first database to the third database, and the synchronizer can copy some of the RFS event records from the second database to the fourth database. The event processor is then operative to generate the FSOs using only the FS and RFS event records stored in the third and fourth databases.
The event processor can also process the event records and RFS event records to generate a set of processed event records, e.g., before or as part of the FSO generation process. For example, the event processor can identify event records (and RFS event records) associated with particular types of events and modify some of the event records having that particular type. The event processor can also delete some of the event records. Furthermore, the event processor can identify conflicts between FS and RFS event records associated with a common file system object, and cause FSOs to be generated that resolve that conflict.
Another file storage system for use with a remote file storage system having access to an RFS is also disclosed. The file storage system includes memory storing a file system (FS) with FS objects, a client interface for providing client access to the FS, a file system module that monitors for changes being made to the FS by the client, and a data monitor that generates an event record responsive to a change being made to the FS. The system also includes a remote file server interface for establishing a connection with the remote file storage system and a synchronizer operative to transmit the event record to the remote file storage system via the remote file server interface.
Yet another file storage system according to the invention includes a local file storage system storing a local file system (LFS) and a remote file storage system storing an RFS. The system also includes a local event monitor on the local system that generates local event records indicative of changes made to the LFS and a remote event monitor on the remote system that generates remote event records indicative of changes made to the RFS. The system further includes an event processor on at least one of the local file storage system and the remote file storage system that is operative to use local and remote event records to synchronize the LFS and the RFS.
A method for generating file system operations for synchronizing the FS and RFS is also described herein. That method includes the steps of accessing a plurality of event records associated with changes previously made to the FS and the RFS, processing the event records to generate a set of processed event records, generating FSOs based at least in part on the set of processed event records, and outputting the FSOs to cause synchronization of the FS and the RFS. The step of processing the event records can include first, processing ones of the event records that are associated with the FS independently from ones of the event records that are associated with the RFS, and second, jointly processing the event records associated with the FS and the RFS.
In a particular method, the step of processing event records includes identifying ones of the event records according to a type of event and modifying at least some of the identified event records having that type. For example, for a rename event indicative of a path modification to a file system object (e.g., an object rename or move), the method includes accessing a first event record indicative of a first rename event and modifying a path associated with a second event record based on the first rename event. A timestamp of the second event record can also be modified. Another example includes identifying event records associated with folder deletions, accessing an event record indicative of a first folder being deleted, and deleting a second event record associated with the first folder.
As indicated above, the step of processing the event records can include deleting some of the event records. For example, the method can include the steps of identifying redundant event records associated with a file system object (e.g., a file or folder) and deleting the redundant event records. Identifying redundant events can include a step of comparing a later-occurring event record associated with the file system object with an earlier-occurring event record associated with the file system object. As another example, a particular FS event record and a particular RFS event records can be deleted if they both perform the same action (e.g., delete a file system object, create of a folder, etc.) in the FS and RFS.
Another particular method of processing the event records includes accessing a first event record associated with a first event occurring to a common file system object in the FS, accessing a second event record associated with a second event occurring to the common file system object in the RFS, and resolving a conflict between the first event and the second event (e.g., by generating FSOs using a lookup table, executing a different synchronization process, etc.). Still another particular method of processing the event records includes identifying ones of the event records that are associated with a particular file system object and using a look-up table to determine if at least one of the identified event records should be modified.
A server for generating file system operations for synchronizing an FS and an RFS is also disclosed. The server includes memory storing a plurality of event records associated with changes previously made to one of the FS and the RFS, an event processor operative to process the event records to generate a set of processed event records, an operations generator operative to generate FSOs based at least in part on the set of processed event records, and an output port operative to output the FSOs to cause synchronization of the FS and the RFS. In a particular embodiment, the event processor is operative to, first, process ones of the event records that are associated with the FS independently from ones of the event records that are associated with the RFS, and second, jointly process the event records associated with the FS and the RFS.
The event processor can process event records in various ways. For example, the event processor can identify ones of the event records based on the type of event and modify at least some of the identified event records having that type. One type is a rename event and the event processor can access a first event record indicative of a first rename event (an object rename or move) and modify a path (and optionally timestamp) associated with a second event record based on the first rename event. Another type is folder deletions. In such a case, the event processor can access a first event record indicative of a first folder being deleted and delete a second event record associated with the first folder.
The event processor can also delete some event records in other ways to generate the set of processed event records. For example, the event processor can identify and delete redundant event records occurring on a file system object (e.g., a file or folder). Redundant events can be identified by comparing chronological events occurring on the same file system path. The event processor can also delete an FS event record and an RFS event record that both indicate the same event (e.g., deleting the same object or creating the same folder) on both the FS and RFS.
The event processor also processes events by generating FSOs that resolve a conflict between an FS event and an RFS event occurring on a file system object common to both the FS and RFS. Lookup tables can be employed to determine the FSO(s) to resolve a conflict. In response to some event conflicts/errors, the event processor is operative to generate instructions to initiate a re-synchronization process of the FS and RFS. The event processor can also use the look up tables to determine which event records, each of which being associated with the same file system object, should be modified during event processing.
The present invention is described with reference to the following drawings, wherein like reference numbers denote substantially similar elements:
The present invention overcomes the problems associated with the prior art by providing a system and method for event-based, steady-state synchronization of local and remote (cloud) file systems. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth (e.g., pseudo-code for functional modules, etc.) in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention may be practiced apart from these specific details. In other instances, details of well-known computing practices and components and components have been omitted, so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
The RFS 202 can be initially created and synchronized with the LFS 204 using a full file system scan (FFS) wherein the LFS 204 is initially copied to remote cloud 102 and stored as RFS 202, for example, when an account is opened with a remote cloud service provider. Subsequently, the LFS 204 and the CFS 202 can be periodically synchronized using bidirectional snapshot-based synchronizations. For example, a full rescan sync (FRS) process can be used to “walk” the LFS 204 and the RFS 202 and create metadata snapshots of these file systems at a time TS. These snapshots can then be compared and the differences used to bi-directionally synchronize the two file systems. A limited rescan sync (LRS) is similar to the FRS, but is only based on partial metadata snapshots (e.g., snapshots for particular folders, etc.) of the two file systems. The snapshot-based synchronization method is more CPU and memory intensive and does not scale well for file systems with large namespaces.
The steady-state synchronization process of
Wide area network adapter 302 provides a means for remote cloud server 102 to communicate with remote clients 114 and local cloud 104 via Internet 106. Local network adapter 310 provides a means for accessing a plurality of data storage devices 322(1-n), via a private network 320. Clients' files are stored in and retrieved from data storage devices 322(1-n) as needed. Additional data storage devices 322(n+) can be added as needed to provide additional storage capacity. In this example embodiment, data storage devices 322(1-n) are network attached storage (NAS) devices, but any suitable type of storage device can be used.
Cloud-based object-storage infrastructures are further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/708,040, filed on Dec. 7, 2012 by Shetty et al. and entitled “System And Method Of Implementing An Object Storage Infrastructure For Cloud-Based Services”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, permission management frameworks for cloud servers is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/689,648, filed on Nov. 29, 2012 by Wijayaratne et al. and entitled “Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems”, which is also incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Remote client 114 is a device and/or process used to access files in RFS 202 via an RFS handler 402. Remote clients 114 can connect with RFS handler 402 either via the Internet 106 or via connections 116 (
Remote VFS module 404 is a software plugin that provides remote client 114 with file and folder access to RFS 202. Initially, it should be noted that RFS 202 includes both an RFS metadata database 406 and the associated data objects stored on data storage devices 322(1-n). Metadata database 406 stores metadata (e.g., virtual files, virtual folders, permissions, etc.) that describes a hierarchical, virtual file system via which remote client 114 can access file system objects and make changes to RFS 202. Data storage devices 322(1-n) store data files that are associated with the virtual file system objects defined by the metadata. The metadata in database 406 stores paths to the associated data files on data storage devices 322(1-n), so that file system objects can be accessed, updated, and created on devices 322(1-n) in accordance with changes made by the remote client 114 to virtual RFS 202.
Remote VFS module 404 intercepts the file system calls coming from remote client 114 and enforces cloud permissions on file system access. If access is permitted, remote VFS module 404 utilizes metadata stored in RFS metadata database 406 to provide remote client 114 with a hierarchical virtual file system (e.g., a directory tree view of folders and files) via which the remote client 114 can access and make changes to the file system objects. When a data file needs to be uploaded to, downloaded from, or deleted from client data storage devices 322(1-n), remote VFS module 404 utilizes RFS object I/O module 408 to store the data file.
RFS object I/O module 408 manages the I/O subsystem for organized data file storage and access on data storage devices 322(1-n). Responsive to VFS module 404 and metadata, RFS object I/O module 408 downloads associated data files from, uploads associated data files to, and deletes associated data files from data storage devices 322(1-n). VFS module 404 provides data files to, and retrieves data files from, remote client 114 as needed via RFS handler 402.
In other words, RFS 202 includes a control plane and a data plane. The control plane includes the metadata in RFS metadata database 406, which the remote client 114 can change via the virtual file system. The data storage devices 322(1-n) represents the data plane, which the remote client 114 does not have direct access to or control over. Rather, changes are propagated to the data plane based on changes that the client makes to the virtual file system.
Changes that are made to a file system are called “events”. Changes made to RFS 202 specifically are referred to as “remote events”, whereas changes made to LFS 204 will be referred to as local events. In the present embodiment, remote events originate as changes to the metadata stored in RFS metadata database 406, for example, as a result of remote client 114 interacting with the virtual file system.
Events include file events and folder events. File events include creating a file (CREATE), updating a file (UPDATE), deleting a file (UNLINK), and renaming a path (RENAME). Because RENAME operates on the path, RENAME can represent both rename events and move events. Additionally, RENAME events are represented from both the source and destination path perspectives. Representing RENAME events in this manner facilitates event processing from both the source and the destination perspectives, as will be described in further detail below. Accordingly, file RENAME events from the source perspective is RENAME_SRC_FILE (RSF) and the file RENAME event from the destination perspective is RENAME_DST_FILE (RDF). Folder events include creating a folder (MKDIR), removing a folder (RMDIR), and renaming a folder. The rename event is represented from both the source perspective (RENAME_SRC_DIR, “RSD”) and from the destination perspective (RENAME_DST_DIR, “RDD”). These events will be described in greater detail below.
Remote VFS module 404 facilitates event-based synchronization of RFS 202 and LFS 204 by trapping the remote events as they occur (i.e., when changes are made to the virtual file system) and providing remote event information to a remote data monitor 410. In particular, remote VFS module 404 monitors I/O requests from remote client 114 and provides remote event information to remote data monitor 410 when it receives an I/O request that changes the virtual file system.
For each remote event, remote data monitor 410 receives the remote event information from remote VFS module 404, and then enters a record of the remote event in a remote event database 412. Optionally, remote data monitor 410 can filter irrelevant and/or redundant remote events (e.g., by optionally implementing phase 0-1 processing described below, etc.) from database 412. Additionally, remote data monitor 410 can notify a remote synchronizer 416 of the occurrence of remote events and can receive synchronization commands from remote synchronizer 416. For example, responsive to a request for remote event records from remote synchronizer 416, remote data monitor 410 can retrieve the requested remote event records from remote event database 412 (e.g., for an event sync period) and provide them to remote synchronizer 416. Remote data monitor 410 can also periodically delete the remote event records from remote event database 412, for example, following a command from remote synchronizer 416 following successful event synchronization.
Remote event database 412 provides storage for a plurality of remote event records associated with a plurality of remote events. These events are maintained according to a scalable relational database schema. Records of remote events are stored in remote event database 412 in chronological order. However, as will be described in further detail below, remote event database 412 can return event records chronologically and/or according to the hierarchy of the virtual file system.
Remote synchronizer 416 controls various aspects of the synchronization process between the remote cloud 102 and the local cloud 104 from the remote cloud side. For example, remote synchronizer 416 can receive commands from local cloud 104, via internet 106 and a local cloud interface 418, to initiate synchronization. In response, remote synchronizer 416 can request remote event records from RFS data monitor 410, receive the remote event records, and provide the remote event records to local cloud 104 via local cloud interface 418. In other embodiments, remote synchronizer 416 can periodically provide the remote event records to local cloud 104 without the events being requested by local cloud 104. In still other embodiments, remote synchronizer 416 can contact local cloud 104 via interface 418 and initiate the synchronization process, for example, in response to remote synchronizer 416 receiving notification of a remote event from remote data monitor 410.
Remote synchronizer 416 is also operative to receive file system operations for modifying RFS 202 from local cloud 104 via interface 418 and to provide those file system operations to RFS handler 402. RFS handler 402, in turn, causes the file system operations to be applied to RFS 202. The file system operations represent changes associated with local events that are being applied to the RFS 202 as part of the bidirectional, steady-state synchronization process (
File system operations can include any file system operations that are recognized by the protocol(s) implemented by RFS handler 402 (e.g., upload, download, delete, move, create, rename, etc.). The file system operations make changes in RFS metadata database 406 and/or client data stores 322(1-n) as part of the synchronization process. For example, the file system operations can cause a file or folder to be created, deleted, renamed, or moved in the metadata virtual file system. As another example, the file system operations can also result in a file being uploaded, downloaded, moved, renamed, or deleted from the client data stores 322(1-n). File system operations will be discussed in further detail below.
As indicated above, remote synchronizer 416 communicates with local cloud interface 418. Local cloud interface 418 is a means by which remote cloud server 102 can establish an internet connection with local cloud server 104 and intercommunicate as needed. In a particular embodiment, local cloud interface 418 maintains an open (always on) connection with local cloud 104 for efficient event-based synchronization.
Non-volatile memory 514 also provides local file storage for client files/objects. By way of example, the nonvolatile memory 514 is shown to include (in addition to other types of memory) a set of hard drives arranged in a RAID configuration. The client's file system on the RAID drives can be accessed by local clients 110 via local network 112, as is known in the art.
Local cloud services 512 represents hardware, software, firmware, or some combination thereof, that provides the event-based synchronization functionality described herein. Local cloud services 512 also provide file storage and retrieval services to local clients 110. The file storage functionality of local cloud services 512 will not be described in detail herein, except to the extent it relates to the synchronization aspects, so as not to unnecessarily complicate this disclosure.
LFS handler 602 receives requests for access (e.g., read requests, write requests, etc.) from local clients 110. In this particular example, clients 110 are WINDOWS® clients, and LFS handler 602 is a server application that includes Samba. (Samba is an open source MS WINDOWS® networking protocol server.) However, the present invention is not limited to these particular examples. Rather, these particular examples, as well as others used in this disclosure, are merely used to provide a clear explanation of the invention. Indeed, a significant advantage of the present invention is that it can be implemented with a wide variety of server applications and file system protocols (e.g., NFS).
Local client 110 is a device/process used to access the files in LFS 204 hosted by local cloud server 104. A user maps the “Share” that is exported by LFS handler 602 (e.g., via Server Messaging Block (SMB) protocol) and then accesses the files and folders within the exported share. In such an example, Samba could export the files and folders of LFS 204 to external Windows clients via SMB protocol.
Local VFS module 604 is a software plugin that monitors I/O calls to LFS 204 to detect local events (changes) being made to LFS 204, which includes metadata 606 and data files in local file store 514. LFS object I/O module 608 manages the I/O subsystem for organized data file storage and access on LFS 204. In this embodiment, local VFS module 604 does not provide a virtual file system for local client 110. Rather, local VFS module 604 monitors the file system calls going to the local file system form the local client 110 based on the protocol that has been implemented. When local VFS module 604 detects a local event (e.g., a change to LFS 204 made by local client 110), local VFS module 604 executes a trap that generates local event information based on the local event and provides the local event information to local data monitor 610. The types of local events are the same as the types of remote events.
For each local event, local data monitor 610 receives the local event information from local VFS module 604, and then enters a local event record in a local event database 612. Optionally, local data monitor 610 can filter irrelevant and/or redundant local events before entering the local events into database 612 (e.g., by implementing phase 0-1 processing as described below, etc.). Local data monitor 610 can also notify a local synchronizer 616 of a local event and can receive synchronization commands from local synchronizer 616. Local data monitor 610 is also responsible for copying/moving local event records from local event database 612 to a local event view database 614 for synchronization purposes. For example, local data monitor 610 can move only local event records for local events that occurred during an event synchronization period determined by local synchronizer 616.
Local event database 612 provides storage for local event records in a scalable relational database schema. Local event records are stored in local event database 612 in chronological order as local events occur.
Local event view database 614 stores local event records that will be undergoing synchronization. The schema for database 614 is the same as for database 612, such that records stored in database 612 can be easily copied/moved to database 614. Once local data monitor 610 moves the local event records from local database 612 to local event view database 614, the local records in view database 614 are considered being processed for synchronization. Accordingly, local data monitor 610 removes the corresponding local event records from local event database 612. Local event records can be stored in local event view database chronologically, and subsequently accessed therefrom chronologically and/or according to the hierarchy of LFS 204.
Local synchronizer 616 is responsible for driving the synchronization process between the remote cloud 102 and the local cloud 104 in this embodiment. Accordingly, local synchronizer 616 is responsible for periodically initiating synchronization, which it can do in a variety of ways. For example, local synchronizer 616 can initiate synchronization whenever local data monitor 610 notifies it of a local event occurring. As another example, local synchronizer 616 can initiate synchronization periodically, for example, according to a time period defined by the client or by the system (e.g., every minute, every 15 minutes, etc.). As still another example, local synchronizer 616 can initiate synchronization upon receiving one or more remote event records from remote cloud 102, for example, via an open (e.g., always on) connection established over internet 106 between local cloud interface 418 (
Local synchronizer 616 is also responsible for receiving (and optionally requesting) remote event records from remote cloud 102 over internet 106. When remote event records are received, local synchronizer stores the remote event records in a remote event database 620. In an alternative embodiment, only remote event information needs to be received from remote cloud 102, and new remote event records can be generated by remote event database 620. In the present embodiment, however, it will be assumed that local synchronizer 616 receives remote event records (e.g., in a table format, etc.) and stores them in remote event database 620.
In response to initiating synchronization, local synchronizer 616 copies at least some of the remote event records (e.g., those associated with an event sync period) from remote event database 620 to a remote event view database 622. Local synchronizer 616 then causes remote event database 620 to purge the copied remote event records therefrom. The schemas for remote databases 412, 620, and 622 are the same in the present embodiment.
Local synchronizer 616 also intercommunicates with an event processor 624. In particular, local synchronizer 616 can instruct event processor 624 to begin event processing, which will result in file system operations being generated based on the local and remote events stored in view databases 614 and 622. In some embodiments, local synchronizer 616 also receives communications from event processor 624. For example, event processor 624 can notify synchronizer 616 that event processing is completed for a current event sync period. In other embodiments, event processor 624 might also provide file system operations to local synchronizer 616.
Event processor 624 carries out event-based processing on the local event records and remote event records stored in local event view database 614 and remote event view database 622, respectively. As will be described in further detail below, event processor 624 is operative to query local event view database 614 and the remote event view database 622 for local event records and remote event records, respectively. Event processor 624 then processes the returned local and remote event records into processed event records and uses the processed event records to generate file system operations that will synchronize RFS 202 and LFS 204 as of the end time (T2) of the current event synchronization period, once the file system actions are applied to the appropriate file systems. Event processor 624 outputs the generated file system operations to sync actions handler 626. Optionally, event processor 624 could provide the operations to synchronizer 616 prior to the operations being provided to sync actions handler 626.
Sync actions handler 626 receives the file system operations and applies the file system operations to RFS 202 and LFS 204 using a set of sync server application program interfaces (APIs) 627. The sync server APIs 627 enable sync actions handler 626 to apply file system operations on LFS 204 via LFS handler 602. The APIs 627 also enable sync actions handler 626 to perform file system operations on RFS 202 remotely via remote cloud interface 618, internet 106, local cloud interface 418 (
Sync actions handler 626, via APIs 627, has the additional function of updating sync table 628 as paths are synchronized. Sync table 628 store the path of every file system path that has been synchronized in LFS 204 and RFS 202. Once paths are synchronized, sync actions handler 626 will utilize the APIs 627 to update sync table 628.
Once the file system actions generated by event processor 624 have been applied to RFS 202 and LFS 204, RFS 202 and LFS 204 are synchronized as of the end of the event synchronization period (T2). Thus, RFS 202 and LFS 204 can be efficiently and repeatedly synchronized by monitoring local and remote file systems for local and remote events, and then applying those events to the other file system. The inventors have found that this event-based synchronization process scales well to file systems uses fewer system resources. Moreover, because event-based synchronization can be performed often (e.g., at periods of a minute or less), the invention provides near steady-state synchronization between the RFS 202 and LFS 204.
As will be apparent from the description thus far, the steady-state synchronization process is primarily implemented and controlled by the local cloud server 104. However, the functional elements of the remote cloud 102 (
Event frontend 704 provides an interface for event database 702 to interact with a data monitor 410/610, local synchronizer 616, and/or event processor 624. Event frontend 704 receives event information for new events and, in response, calls event backend 706 to create new records in response to each event notification. Event frontend 704 can also receive event records (e.g., in table format, etc.) and call event backend 706 to store the event records. Event frontend 704 also receives queries for event records from event processor 624 and is operative to retrieve the requested data from event backend 706 and provide the data to event processor 624. Event frontend 704 permits events to be stored in event record store 712 in chronological order, and optionally can export records associated with events chronologically and/or according to the hierarchy of either RFS 202 and LFS 204.
Event backend 706 creates, stores, and retrieves records to and from event record store 712 using, in this embodiment, an SQLite database backend 708. SQLite database backend 708 is a self-contained, scalable, embedded database useful for event storage. As another option, database 702 could employ a flat file backend to facilitate encoding the database model as a single file.
To create a record of an event, event backend 706 receives event information from event frontend 704 and calls SQLite database backend 708 to create and store the record(s) for that event in event record store 712. Additionally, responsive to a query from event frontend 704, event backend 706 is operative to retrieve records from event record store 712 (via SQLite backend 708) and provide those records to event frontend 704. Event frontend 704, in turn, provides the event records to the requesting entity, such as data monitor 410/610, synchronizer 616, or event processor 624. In a particular embodiment, the query requests records for events associated with a particular time period.
Each event record in Events table 802 includes an Event ID field 810, a Full Path field 812, a New Path field 814, a UQID field 816, a Path Type field 818, an Event Type field 820, a Timestamp field 822, a User ID field 824, a Stmtime field 826, a Size field 828, and a Flags field 830. A record is created in Events table 802 for each event that occurs in an associated file system other than rename events. For rename events (file or folder), two event records 802 are created: one from the source path perspective and one from the destination path perspective.
Event ID 810 is a key field of events table 802 and includes data uniquely identifying each event record 802. Event ID 810 is assigned by the database (e.g., by SQLite backend 708). Full Path 812 field includes data indicating the path of the file system object on which the event occurred. For RENAME events full path field 812 for the source event record will include the source path, whereas field 812 will include the destination path for the destination event record. Thus, path information can be accessed from both rename path perspectives.
New Path field 814 includes data indicating the new path assigned when an event occurred. UQID field 816 includes data uniquely identifying the file system object in the RFS 202. The UQID field can be used, for example, to identify the same file system objects on different file systems (e.g., RFS 202 and LFS 204) and/or associate a virtual file system object (e.g., in metadata database 406) with the data file in the data store (e.g., in client data store 322). Path Type field 818 includes data (e.g., a flag) indicating if the event record is associated with a file or a folder. Event Type field 820 includes data indicating the type of event (e.g., CREATE, UPDATE, UNLINK, RENAME_SRC_FILE, RENAME_DST_FILE, MKDIR, RMDIR, RENAME_SRC_DIR, RENAME_DST_DIR) that the event record is associated with. Timestamp field 822 includes data indicating the time the event occurred. User ID field 824 include data identifying the user that caused the event. Stmtime field 826 includes data indicating the time when the event on the associated file system object was completed. Size field 828 includes data indicating the size of a data file associated with the file system object. Size field 828 is set to zero (0) when the associated file system object is a folder. Other field 830 includes other data that might be useful during event processing (e.g., error information, reduction status, feedback, etc.).
Each record in File Systems table 804 includes a File System (FS) ID field 840, a Full Path field, 842, a Child Name field 844, a Parent Path field 846, a Parent Depth field 848, a Path type field 850, a UQID field 852, a Stmtime field 854, a Size field 856, and a Checksum field 858. A record is created in File Systems table 804 for each file system path on which an event occurred. As shown in
File System (FS) ID field 840 is the key field of File Systems table 804 and includes data uniquely identifying a file systems record. Child Name field 844 includes data representing the name of a child file system object to the path contained in Full Path field 842. Parent Path field 846 includes data representing the parent path of the path represented in Full Path 842. Parent Depth field 848 includes data indicating the depth of the path stored in Parent Path field 846. Finally, Checksum field 858 includes a checksum for the file system object located at the path defined by full path field 842. The checksum value is useful for comparison during synchronization when the full path 842 points to a file. Full Path field 842, Path Type field 850, UQID field 852, Stmtime field 854, and Size field 856 contain the same data as Full Path field 812, Path Type field 818, UQID field 816, Stmtime field 826, and Size field 828, respectively, of Events table 802. However, Stmtime field 854 can contains data indicating the time when the last event on the associated file system path was completed.
Records are stored in Renames table for all rename events. Recall that rename events encompass both rename events and move events on file system objects. Each record in Renames table 806 includes a Rename ID field 870, a Source Event ID field 872, and a Destination Event ID field 874. As is apparent from
Rename ID field 870 is the key field of Renames table 806 and include data uniquely identifying each rename record. Source Event ID field 872 contains data representing an Event ID identifying the source event record for the rename event. The source event record provides a record of the rename event from the perspective of the source path of the file or directory. Destination Event ID field 874 contains data representing an Event ID identifying the destination event record for the rename event. The destination event record provides a record of the rename event from the perspective of the destination path of the file or directory.
The following exemplary queries can be used to insert contents into the event database 702. To add an event record to Event table 802, the following query can be used:
To add a file system record to File Systems table 804, the following query can be used:
To add a rename record to Renames table 806, the following query can be used:
Event processor 624 includes an RFS phase 0 module 902, an LFS phase 0 module 904, an RFS phase 1 module 906, and an LFS phase 1 module 908. Event processor 624 also includes a phase 2 module 910 and a phase 3 module 912. The modules of event processor 624 have read/write/modify access to the records (event records, file system records, and rename records) in remote event view database 622 and in local event view database 614, for example, via respective event frontends 704. Alternatively, the records in view databases 622 and 614 can be cached for quicker access.
RFS phase 0 module 902 accesses the remote event records 802, file system records 804, and rename records 806 of remote event view database 622 and performs various path reduction and modification processes to the remote event records 802. Subsequently, RFS Phase 1 module 906 accesses the remote event records, file system records, and rename records, as modified by phase 0 module 902, and performs further reduction of the remote event records 802. RFS phase 1 module 906 can utilize a set of look-up tables to determine how the number of remote event records 802 can be reduced further. LFS phase 0 module 904 and LFS phase 1 module 908 operate substantially the same on the local event records, file system records, and rename records of local event view database 614.
As shown in
The modified local event records and modified remote event records produced by phase 0 and phase 1 processing are combined and processed further by phase 2 module 910. Phase 2 module 910 can reduce the remote event records and local event records even further. Additionally, phase 2 module 910 compares local and remote events that occur on common file system object paths in LFS 204 and RFS 202, and resolves conflicts (if any) between the local and remote events. In a particular embodiment, phase 2 module 910 utilizes a series of lookup tables and APIs to resolve LFS-RFS event conflicts. As part of the conflict resolution process, phase 2 module 910 generates file system operations that, when applied to RFS 202 and/or LFS 204, implement the conflict resolution.
Phase 3 module 912 is utilized to generate file system operations based on the remaining local and remote event records. Because phase 2 module 910 and phase 3 module 912 both generate file system operations to be applied to RFS 202 and LFS 204, modules 910 and 912 can also be perceived as a single module 914 and their respective functions can be implemented in combination.
Phase 0 event processing will now be described in greater detail. Phase 0 processing is based on the types of events that the event records are associated with. In particular, phase 0 processing is based on RENAME events and RMDIR events. Phase 0 event processing (1) adjusts path prefixes relevant to folder and file renames, and (2) removes events that happened within a deleted folder as these events are no longer relevant.
Phase 0 path modification is carried out on events that happened on a path that changed at some time. The events whose paths are being modified will have a temporal precedence with regard to the event that necessitated the path modifications. Usually, the event records being modified are those that occurred on the path prior to the rename event. All the events that happened after the rename event remain unchanged. The following are two examples of phase 0 path modifications for RENAME:
In example (1), two events previously made to one file system (e.g., RFS 202) are shown on the left hand side (LHS) of the equation, and two modified events are shown on the right hand side (RHS) of the equation. On the LHS, an update event is followed by a rename event. Phase 0 module 902 modifies the LHS events as shown on the RHS. In particular, phase 0 module 902 chronologically moves the rename event ahead of the update event and moves the update event after the rename event, for example by modifying timestamp field 822 in the event records. Phase 0 module 902 also modifies the path field 812 in the UPDATE event to reflect the new path. Thus, if the events on the RHS of example (1) were applied to a second file system (e.g., LFS 202), the second file system would be synchronized with the first file system.
In example (2), the two events on the LHS have been made to a first file system. In particular, a file “c.txt” has been renamed to “d.txt” and moved to a new director by the first RENAME event. Note that the file RENAME event accomplishes both the rename and move tasks. The second RENAME changes the name of the/A directory to the/X directory. Phase 0 module 902 modifies these events by chronologically moving the folder RENAME event in ahead of the file RENAME event. Phase 0 module also modifies the paths for the file rename event records to reflect the prior folder RENAME event. Thus, if the events on the RHS of example (2) were applied to a second file system, the second file system would be synchronized with the first file system.
The following is exemplary pseudo-code for a phase 0 path modification algorithm.
Phase 0 module 902 performs the above algorithm for each rename event record in Renames table 806 (line 1). The algorithm determines when the rename even occurred and defines a subsequent time. The algorithm also determines the source path (e.g., /A in example 1) and the destination path (e.g., /B in example 1). Then, via the nested FOR loop, phase 0 module 902 checks all the event records in table 802 in chronological order. Module 902 determines the ones of the other event records containing the source path, and modifies those records that occurred before the rename event with the destination path. The algorithm also modifies the timestamps of those events such that they occur after the rename event.
Phase 0 module 902 also checks for RMDIR (remove directory) events and deletes event records that are no longer relevant in view of the RMDIR event. An example of this process is shown below:
On the LHS of the example, three events occur on folder A and then folder A is deleted in a first file system. Accordingly, phase 0 module 902 deletes the three events occurring before the RMDIR A event. Thus, the only remaining event on the RHS is RMDIR A. When RMDIR A is applied to a second file system, the first and second file systems will be synchronized (without a folder A). The following is pseudo-code for implementing this event reduction:
The above algorithm searches the event records in table 802 and returns each RMDIR event. For each RMDIR event, the algorithm determines the removed folder and the timestamp for the RMDIR event. Then, the algorithm searches through all events in table 802 by timestamp. If the event's timestamp is later than the timestamp of the RMDIR event, then the event record is left alone. However, if the event's timestamp is before that of the RMDIR event and if the event's path field 812 starts with or is a child of the deleted folder, then the event is removed.
Based on the above processes, phase 0 module 902 modifies paths and reduces remote event records. Phase 0 module 904 modifies paths and reduces local event records in substantially the same manner, as indicated previously.
Following phase 0 modification and reduction, RFS phase 1 module 906 performs event reduction and modification on redundant remote event records. Phase 1 event processing reduces consecutive and redundant events that happened on the same file system object path. The following are some examples:
In example (1), the common file system object is a.txt. On the LHS, a.txt is created and then updated twice. RFS phase 1 module 906 compresses these three events to one CREATE event on the RHS. In other words, the update events are removed from the events table 802. This CREATE event will cause a.txt, in its most recent form, to be created on LFS 204.
In example (2), the common file system object is a.txt. On the LHS, a.txt is created and then deleted. Therefore, no action needs to be taken on the RHS (e.g., at the LFS 204), and RFS phase 1 module 906 deletes the CREATE and UNLINK events from the events table 802.
In example (3), the common file system object is folder B. On the LHS, folder/A is renamed to folder/B and then folder/B is renamed to folder/C. RFS phase 1 module 906 reduces these two events to a RENAME event from folder/A to folder/C. The intermediate rename event to folder/B can be eliminated. Folder/A will be renamed to folder/C on LFS 204.
In example (4), the common file system object is folder B. On the LHS, folder/A is renamed to folder B. Then, folder/B is deleted. RFS phase 1 module 906 reduces these two events to RMDIR/A on the RHS. When RMDIR/A is applied to LFS 204, folder/A will be removed from LFS 204.
RFS phase 1 module 906 operates as follows. When phase 1 reduction begins, RFS phase 1 module 906 loops through the file system paths in file systems table 804. For each file system path record in table 804, retrieves the associated event records in events table 802 that occurred on that path and analyzes them in chronological order according to timestamp (timestamp field 822). For each two consecutive event records, RFS phase 1 module 906 utilizes a reduction API to access tables (
The following is exemplary pseudo-code that implements phase 1 reduction.
LFS phase 1 module 908 operates substantially the same as RFS phase 1 module 906, except that it operates on the local events from view database 614 as previously modified by phase 0 module 904. Optionally, RFS and LFS phase 1 modules 906 and 908 can be combined into a single module that performs phase 1 reduction, independently, on the remote event records and the local event records.
File event types for a file event occurring at time (T) include CREATE 1004, UPDATE 1006, UNLINK 1008, RENAME_SRC_FILE (RSF) 1010, and RENAME_DST_FILE (RDF) from a second source (SRC2). Possible event types for a file event occurring at time (T+1) include CREATE 1014, UPDATE 1016, UNLINK 1018, RSF to a second destination (DST2) 1020, and RDF. The intersection of the rows and columns in table 1002 provide the event reduction (if any) for the two particular events to the phase 1 reduction process.
Some column-and-row intersections in table 1002 indicate a Dirty Event State (DES). A DES indicates that the succession of the two events should not happen. For example, the same file should not be created at times (T) and (T+1). Accordingly, the intersection of column 1004 and row 1014 indicates DES. The same is true for other combinations of events. If a DES state occurs, the phase 1 process can optionally log that the DES occurred, for example in the associated Other fields 830.
Some other intersections indicate that no reduction is possible (NR). In these cases, the phase 1 process would move on from the particular event combination to the next event combination. Conversely, the intersection of column 1004 and row 1018 indicates to reduce events (RE). This combination of events corresponds to example 2 described above, and the phase 1 reduction process can reduce these two events.
Other intersections in table 1002 indicate particular reductions. For example, the intersection of column 1004 (CREATE) and row 1016 (UPDATE) can be reduced to CREATE event with a timestamp corresponding to the UPDATE event 1016. Similarly, the intersection of column 1004 (CREATE) and row 1020 (RSF to DST2) can be reduced to a CREATE DST2 event. The intersection of column 1006 (UPDATE) and row 1016 (UPDATE) can be reduced to a single UPDATE that corresponds to the second (T+1) update. The intersection of column 1008 (UNLINK) and row 1014 (CREATE) can be reduced to a single UPDATE event. Furthermore, the intersection of column 1012 (RDF from SRC2) and column 1018 (UNLINK) can be reduced to an UNLINL SRC 2 event. The intersection of column 1012 (RDF from SRC2) and column 1020 (RSF to DST2) can be reduced to RENAME_SRC_FILE to DST2. Finally, the intersection of column 1012 (RDF from SRC2) and row 1022 (RDF) can be reduced to Unlink SRC2 and RDF. For example, RENAME/A/a.txt to/A/b.txt+RENAME/A/b.txt to A/c.txt reduces to UNLINK/A/a.txt+RENAME/A/b.txt to/A/c.txt. Event records are reduced because a RENAME event (2 event records) is replaced with an UNLINK event (1 event record).
The intersection of column 1072 (RDD) and row 1076 (RMDIR) indicates that an RDD event at time (T) and an RSD event at time (T+1) can be reduced to RMDIR SRC. This is similar to Example 4 given above. The intersection of column 1072 (RDD) and row 1078(RSD) indicates that an RDD at time (T) event followed by an RSD event at time (T+1) reduces to RSD SRC1 to DST 2. This is similar to Example 3 given above.
Returning now to
The phase 2 module 910 reduces local and remote events only in the following three cases:
In each of the three cases above, the same folder is made or deleted, or the same file is deleted, on both the LFS 204 and the RFS 202. Therefore, phase 2 module 910 is able to remove the event records for these events.
The phase 2 module 910 has another important function in that it resolves conflicts between local and remote events that happen on a common file system object. A conflict happens when file system operations on any specific path does not leave the event stream in a consistent state. To resolve these conflicts, phase 2 module 910 utilizes conflict resolution look-up tables.
The following are examples of conflict resolution provided by table 1102. The intersection of column 1104 (RFS CREATE A) and row 1114 (LFS CREATE A) indicates an operation “Pull A”. The “pull” operation represents both a push to the RFS 202 and a pull to the LFS 204. Accordingly, “Pull A” will result in the LFS file A being pushed to RFS 202 and the RFS file A being pulled to the LFS 204. Optionally, because LFS file A is pushed to RFS 202, the RFS file A can be stored as a prior version. Where versioning is employed in RFS 202, the prior versions of file A in RFS 202 can be recovered if needed.
As another example, the intersections of column 1104 (RFS CREATE A) and rows 1116-1120 result in a (*) action. The (*) indicates that this combination of events should not happen. If it does, a full rescan sync (FRS) is triggered to resynchronize the LFS 204 and the RFS 202.
As still another example, the intersection of column 1104 (RFS CREATE A) and row 1122 (LFS RDF B to A) indicates an operation LMove B to A. The LMove action causes the file B in RFS 202 to be renamed as file A in the RFS 202. If the RFS 202 includes versioning, the existing file A in RFS 202 can be stored as an older version of file A in view of the renaming of B.
As yet another example, the intersection of column 1106 (RFS UPDATE A) and row 1118 (LFS UNLINK A), results in an action Pull A. Accordingly, RFS file A is pulled to LFS 204 and stored thereon as file A.
As another example, the intersection of column 1108 (RFS UNLINK A) and row 1118 (LFS UNLINK A) indicates No Action (NA). However, operations are generated that cause sync actions handler 626 to modify the sync table 628 to remove the file path therefrom.
As still another example, the intersection of column 1110 (RFS RENAME_SRC_FILE A to C) and row 1116 (UPDATE A) indicate the operations Move A to C and Push C. The Move operation causes file A to be renamed as file C in LFS 204. The Push C operation causes the renamed file C on LFS 204 to be pushed to RFS 202 and stored as another version of file C in RFS 202.
The other operations specified by table 1102 should be apparent in view of the above examples. It will also be apparent, that the operations specified in table 1102 for a particular conflict might not be a perfect solution to that conflict. However, when the RFS 202 (or optionally the LFS 204) includes file versioning, versions of data files occurring in the RFS 202 and in the LFS 204 can be maintained and can be recovered. It should also be noted that the conflict resolution operations specified in table 1102 can be modified to resolve conflicts in a desired way.
Some combinations indicate a (*). Accordingly, the conflict resolution of those combinations is the same as above (i.e., log error and perform FRS). Other intersections indicate FRS, in which an FRS will be performed. Still other intersections indicate LRS, which indicates that the associated directory should be subjected to a limited rescan synchronization process. Other intersections indicate that folder paths should be moved/renamed. LMove indicates that a corresponding folder path should be moved/renamed in the RFS 202. Conversely, Move indicates a folder path should be moved/rename in LFS 204. Finally, No Action (NA) indicates that no action should be taken for the particular combination of events. However, operations might still be generated to add a path to sync table 628 or recursively remove a path from sync table 628.
As with table 1102, the conflict resolution actions described in tables 1124, 1144, and 1164 might be compromise solutions. However, the conflict resolution actions can be implemented conservatively, and to favor data preservation, such as via versioning. Additionally, FRS and LRS processes can be called to ensure the integrity of the synchronization.
Returning now to
The following are examples of file system operations that can be generated by phase 3 module 912 based on the processed local and remote event records.
In the above examples, the operations for example (1) are generated by phase 3 module 912, the operations for example (2) are generated by phase 2 module 910 using table 1102, and the operations of example (3) are generated by phase 3 module 912. Phase 3 module 912 would assemble these file system operations into an operation output stream and provide that stream to sync action handler 626.
To generate file system operations, phase 3 module 912 categorizes events into three categories. Those categories are independent events, simple dependent events, and complex dependent events. An independent event is an event whose path has no events in the other file system. For example, a local event is independent if there are no remote events for its path. Similarly, a remote event is independent if there are no local events for its path. All other events are dependent events. A simple dependent event is a local event for whose path there is only one RFS event. Similarly, a simple dependent event is also a remote event for whose path there is only one LFS event. An event that is not independent or simple dependent is complex dependent.
Phase 3 module 912 generates file system operations directly for independent events. However, phase 3 module 912 relies on the conflict resolution of phase 2 to generate file system operations for simple dependent events. For complex dependent events, phase 3 module 912 collects the paths of the complex dependent events for limited rescan syncs of those paths. Phase 3 module 912 further generates operations to initiate the limited rescan syncs and full rescan syncs in the file system operation stream. Phase 3 module 912 generates and outputs the file system operation stream to sync actions handler 626 for all the processed event records generated during phases 0-3.
The following is pseudo-code to implement phase 3 processing:
Finally, it should be noted that the file system operations available to be output by event processor 624 will be determined by the application and file system protocols being used. However, it is expected that file system operations such as push, pull, delete, move, rename, etc. will be widely employed. Additionally, the file system operations that are used can also include operations to trigger other processes (e.g., FRS, LRS, modification of tables, etc.).
Some methods of the present invention will now be described with reference to
Method 1400 includes a first step 1402 wherein a plurality of event records, which are associated with a plurality of events, are accessed. Each of the invents corresponds to a change previously made the FS or the RFS. In a second step 1404, the event records are processed to generate a set of processed event records. In a third step 1406, file system operations are generated based at least in part on the set of processed event records. Each of the file system operations is operative to cause a change to at least one of the FS and the RFS. In a fourth step 1408, the file system operations are output to cause synchronization of the FS and the RFS.
The description of particular embodiments of the present invention is now complete. Many of the described features may be substituted, altered or omitted without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, functional modules described with respect to the local cloud can also be implemented in the remote cloud. For example, an event processor could also be implemented in the remote cloud services such that event reduction could be performed, and file system operations could be generated, by the remote cloud. As another example, alternative conflict resolution actions can be developed depending on design goals. These and other deviations from the particular embodiments shown will be apparent to those skilled in the art, particularly in view of the foregoing disclosure.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/749,451, filed Jan. 22, 2020 by at least one common inventor and entitled “System and Method for Event-Based Synchronization of Remote and Local File Systems”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/881,269, filed Jan. 26, 2018 by at least one common inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/958,435, filed Aug. 2, 2013 by at least one common inventor, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/679,339, filed Aug. 3, 2012 and having at least one common inventor, and of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/679,383, filed Aug. 3, 2012 and having at least one common inventor, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their respective entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6609128 | Underwood | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6947991 | Burton et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7945652 | Tsao et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8311980 | Saito et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8510794 | Kaushik et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 9424429 | Roth et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 10380076 | Wijayaratne et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10909069 | Haviv et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11144510 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 20070204120 | Garimella et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226273 | Rath et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271280 | Chandasekaran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090037492 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094252 | Wong et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119750 | Sembugamoorthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327854 | Chhajer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110307442 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20130191336 | Ducott, III et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140006354 | Parkison | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006357 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006465 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007239 | Sharpe et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122427 | Dary | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188798 | Mackenzie et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140250073 | Zalpuri et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279888 | Bai et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150088942 | Shah | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150350107 | Kayaba | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160092491 | Cowling et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160203013 | Bayapuneni et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170220596 | Smith et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20200073854 | Wijayaratne et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,459, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2021. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,038, Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2021. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/808,425, Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2021. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,038, Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2021. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/808,425, Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2021. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/808,425, Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,623, Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,623, Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2022. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210255991 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61679339 | Aug 2012 | US | |
| 61679383 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16749451 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Child | 17161484 | US | |
| Parent | 15881269 | Jan 2018 | US |
| Child | 16749451 | US | |
| Parent | 13958435 | Aug 2013 | US |
| Child | 15881269 | US |
