In a variety of well completion operations, a sandface assembly, including screens, is conveyed by a service tool and positioned across a hydrocarbon bearing formation. Upon placement of the sandface assembly, numerous well operations, such as placing a gravel pack in the annulus between the Earth formation and the screens, are performed. Successful completion of these operations typically requires numerous movements of the service tool relative to the sandface assembly to effectuate a variety of flow paths.
For successful execution of a service job, a detailed understanding of the downhole interactions between the service tool/service string and the sandface assembly is required Specific downhole service tools are actuated by movement of the service string which requires an operator to have substantial knowledge of the downhole service tool as well as an ability to visualize the operation and status of the service tool. Typically, the operator marks the service string at a surface location to track the relative positions of the service tool and the downhole sandface assembly. As the service string is moved, each marked position is assumed to indicate a specific position of the service tool relative to the downhole sandface assembly. This approach, however, relies on substantial knowledge and experience of the operator and is susceptible to inaccuracies due to, for example, extension and contraction of the service string. Moreover, in highly deviated wellbores with difficult trajectories, much of the string movement is lost between the surface and the downhole location due to string buckling, compression, and the like. In such systems where gravel packs are performed, the service tool also can be prone to sticking with respect to the downhole sandface assembly.
In general, the present invention provides a technique for facilitating the use of service tools at downhole locations. The approach utilizes a substantially non-moving service tool. While remaining stationary, the flow paths within the service tool can be repositioned from one operational mode to another to carry out a variety of service procedures at a downhole location.
Certain embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The present invention relates to a system and methodology for facilitating the operation of a service string in a downhole environment. The service string comprises a service tool that may be moved downhole into a wellbore to a desired formation location. The service tool is used in conjunction with other downhole well equipment, such as a sandface assembly. The service tool may be moved through several operational modes without physically sliding the service tool relative to the sandface assembly, i.e. without lineal movement of the service tool within the sandface assembly otherwise caused by movement of the service string.
Referring generally to
The wellbore 32 can be vertical or deviated depending on the type of well application and/or well environment in which service string 34 is used. Generally, wellbore 32 is drilled into a geological formation 40 containing desirable production fluids, such as petroleum. In at least some applications, wellbore 32 is lined with a wellbore casing 42. A plurality of perforations 44 is formed through wellbore casing 42 to enable flow of fluids between the surrounding formation 40 and the wellbore 32. Alternatively, the wellbore may be unlined. In this latter case, the top end of the sandface assembly is positioned in the lower end of the casing before the open hole section begins.
In the embodiment illustrated, sandface assembly 38 comprises a bottom hole assembly 46. In some applications, the bottom hole assembly 46 extends into cooperation with a lower packer 48, installed on a previous trip downhole. In other applications, e.g. open hole applications, the lower packer 48 is not necessary. The bottom hole assembly 46 has a receptacle structure 50 into which service tool 36 of service string 34 is inserted for the performance of various procedures. In one example of bottom hole assembly 46, the receptacle structure 50 comprises a circulation housing having one or more ports 51 through which gravel is placed via the service tool. In this embodiment, the circulation housing also may include a closing sleeve (not shown) which is closed after the process of gravel deposition is completed. The bottom hole assembly 46 also comprises a gravel packing (GP) packer 52 positioned between receptacle structure 50 and the wall of wellbore 32. The circulation housing and gravel packing packer 52 effectively provide the receptacle that works in cooperation with service string 34. By way of example, cooperative features may include a mechanical attachment at the top of packer 52 for receiving the service tool, and polish bores can be located above and below circulation port 51 to ensure gravel deposition is directed only through port 51. The bottom hole assembly 46 further comprises a screen assembly 54 that may be formed of one or more individual screens. In some applications, service string 34, service tool 36 and bottom hole assembly 46 are used in cooperation to carry out a gravel packing operation in which a gravel pack 56 is placed in the region of wellbore 32 generally surrounding screen 54.
Service tool 36 and sandface assembly 38 can be used to carry out a variety of procedures during a given operation, such as a gravel packing operation. Additionally, well system 30 may be switched between many procedures without movement of service string 34. In other words, the service string 34 and service tool 36 “sit still” relative to bottom hole assembly 46 instead of continuously being “pulled up” or “slacked off” to cause changes from one procedure to another.
As illustrated schematically in
For example, during running-in-hole of service string 34 to perform a gravel packing operation, valve system 58 is placed in configuration A which enables the open flow of fluid from T1 to T2 and from A2 to A1 during movement downhole. Once at the desired wellbore position, the setting of packer 52 is achieved by actuating valve system 58 to configuration B in which fluid flow is blocked between T1 and T2. After setting packer 52, an annulus test can be performed by actuating valve system 58 to configuration C in which flow between A1 and A2 is blocked. An operational mode for spotting fluids prior to the gravel pack is achieved by actuating valve system 58 to configuration D in which fluids may be flowed down the service string at T1 and returned via the annulus at A1.
In this example, the actual gravel packing is initiated by actuating valve system 58 to configuration E which allows the gravel slurry to flow from T1 to A2 to form gravel pack 56 along the exterior of screen 54. The carrier fluid then flows to T2 and is directed out of the service tool 36 to the annulus at A1 for return to the surface. Subsequently, valve system 58 may be placed in a reversing configuration which is illustrated as configuration F. In this configuration, fluid may be flowed down through A1 and returned via the service string tubing at T1. Valve system 58 also may be adjusted to a breaker configuration G that facilitates the breaking or removal of filter cake when service tool 36 is removed from wellbore 32. By removing the need to physically move the service string 34 to adjust the valve configurations, premature breakage of the filter cake is avoided.
The valve system 58 may be actuated between many operational configurations with no movement of service string 34 relative to packer 52. Other changes between operational configurations only require a simple “pull up” input or a “slack off” input to cause a slight movement above GP packer 52 rather than moving service tool 36 within receptacle structure 50. The ability to easily change from one valve system configuration to another with no or minimal movement of the service string provides a much greater degree of functionality with respect to the operation of the well system. For example, the sequential valve configuration changes from configuration B to configuration D can be repeated or reversed. Additionally, the circulating configuration E and the reversing configuration F are readily reversible and can be repeated. Accordingly, valve system 58 provides great functionality to achieve a desired well operation, e.g. gravel packing operation, without being susceptible to sticking problems and without requiring the operational finesse of conventional systems.
Referring generally to
Control signals can be sent to valve control system 68 via, for example, pressure signals, pressure signals on the annulus, load, e.g. tensile, signals, flow rate signals, other wireless communication signals sent downhole, and electromagnetic signals. In one embodiment, valve control system 68 receives pressure signals sent via the annulus surrounding service string 34 and appropriately actuates one or more of the individual valves 62, 64 and/or 66 in response to the pressure signal. In this example, annular valve 60 is used to control flow between the annulus and the service string and is actuated between open and closed positions with string weight. For example, the service string 34 may be pulled up, i.e. placed in tension for specific command sequences, and the string weight may be slacked-off, i.e. placed under a set down load, for circulation operations. Alternatively, the valve may be designed to open and allow circulation operations when the service string is placed under tension and to close for command sequences when weight is slacked off. Valves 60, 62, 64 and 66 can be individually actuated to achieve any of the valve configurations A-G, for example, illustrated in
Although other types of valve control systems 68 can be implemented, one example uses an intelligent remote implementation system (IRIS) control technology available from Schlumberger Corporation. An IRIS based control system 68 is able to recognize signatures in the form of, for example, pressure signatures, flow rate signatures or tensile signatures. As illustrated in
With control systems, such as the IRIS based control system available from Schlumberger Corporation, an over-ride can be used to disable electronics 78 and to move the valves to a standard gravel packing operational position. In this embodiment, a high pressure, e.g. approximately 4000 psi, is applied through the annulus to over-ride control 72. For example, control 72 may be provided with a rupture disc (not shown) that ruptures upon sufficient annulus pressure to enable manipulation of service tool 36 to a default position via the pressurized annulus fluid. By way of example, the over-ride may be designed to release service tool 36 from packer 52 while opening lower valve 62, opening port body valve 66, and closing upper valve 64. The service tool 36 can then be operated in this standard service tool configuration.
Other methods and mechanisms also can be used to control one or more of the valves of valve system 58. For example, lower valve 62 can be designed to be responsive to a ball passing through an obstruction in a proximate bore. The obstruction can be a collet device that flexes as the ball passes through. The control senses the flexing and causes lower valve actuation. The ball that passes through the flexing collet can be dissolvable such that it presents no obstruction after performing its primary function. In this embodiment, flow is again enabled when the ball is dissolved. Lower valve 62 also can be designed as a ball valve responsive to a predetermined fluid flow. For example, fluid flow through a venturi can be used to create a pressure drop that is used directly or in conjunction with an appropriate electronic actuator to actuate valve 62 to a desired position, e.g. a closed position. The flow activated control approach also can be used as a backup for a control system, such as the control system described with reference to
In this latter embodiment, the first actuation of lower ball valve 62 or other downhole device is performed in response to the sensing of a steady-state condition. The steady-state condition is detected by, for example, unchanging magnitudes of pressure and/or temperature. For example, control device 84 can be designed to actuate when pressure P satisfies the steady state condition at time tn. Satisfaction of the steady-state condition requires that: P(tn)−P(tn−1)˜0; P(tn−1)−P(tn−2)˜0; etc. for t=the predetermined number of times samples. The same approach can be used for determining a steady-state temperature condition necessary for actuation of valve 62.
As illustrated graphically in
Referring again to
By way of example, actuator 96 may comprise an electromechanical device 108 coupled to hydrostatic pressure source 98, as illustrated in
Referring generally to
In the embodiment illustrated in
The service tool 36 and bottom hole assembly 46 illustrated in
When the service tool 36 and the bottom hole assembly 46 are properly positioned within wellbore 32, lower ball valve 62 is actuated to a closed position, as illustrated in
Subsequently, the wellbore annulus is pressurized to test the seal formed by GP packer 52. The service string 34 is then manipulated between pulling and slacking off weight to effectively push and pull on packer 52 which tests the ability of the packer to take weight. If the packer 52 is properly set, a slack joint portion 136 of service tool 36 is released to enable the opening and closing of annular valve 60 by movement of slack joint portion 136 relative to the stationary portion of service tool 36 within bottom hole assembly 46. The slack joint portion 136 can be released via a variety of release mechanisms. For example, a trigger device, such as trigger device 134, can be used to move a release catch 138, thereby releasing slack joint portion 136 for movement of valve 60 between open and closed positions. Other release mechanisms e.g. shear pins responsive to annulus pressure to disengage a mechanical lock and other shear mechanisms, also can be used to temporarily lock slack joint portion 136 to the remainder of service tool 36 during the initial stages of the gravel packing operation.
Once slack joint portion 136 is released, weight is slacked-off service string 34 to move annular valve 60 into an open position, as illustrated in
The service string 34 is then pulled up to close annular valve 60. While annular valve 60 is in the closed position, pressure signatures are sent downhole and communicated to control module 72. In response to the pressure signatures, control module 72 actuates the triple valve and moves lower valve 62 to an open position, upper valve 64 to a closed position, and port body valve 66 to an open position. The tension on service string 34 is then slacked off to again open annular valve 60, as illustrated in
Following development of gravel pack 56 around screen 54 (see
Upon completion of the reverse circulation, service string 34 is again lifted slightly to move floating top portion 136 and close annular valve 60. Then, an appropriate pressure signature is sent downhole to control module 72 which opens lower valve 62. At this time, service tool 36 also is undocked from GP packer 52 and bottom hole assembly 46 to place the service tool in the “breaker” position. In this position the service tool is configured as a pipe with a through-bore, whereby fluid can be circulated straight down to remove the filter cake accumulated along the wellbore. The service tool 36 may be released from packer 52 via a variety of release mechanisms. In one embodiment, a trigger device, such as trigger device 134, can be used to actuate a release that disengages service tool 36 from packer 52 and bottom hole assembly 46. Other release mechanisms, such as collets, hydraulically actuated latch mechanisms, mechanically actuated latch mechanisms, or other latch mechanisms, also can be used to enable engagement and disengagement of the service tool from the bottom hole assembly.
Flow of fluid between certain ports, such as ports 130 and ports 116 can be achieved by creating flow paths along a body 144 of service tool 36. By way of example, flow paths 146 can be formed by creating a plurality of drilled bypass holes 148 extending generally longitudinally through body 144, as illustrated in the cross-sectional view of
As discussed above, one or more trigger devices 134 can incorporate an IRIS based control system, such as those available from Schlumberger Corporation. The one or more trigger devices 134 can be used, for example, to accomplish one-time actuation, such as the release of floating top portion 136, the release of service tool 36 from packer 52, and/or the setting of GP packer 52. Separate devices may be used for each specific action, or a single trigger device 134 can be designed with a plurality of actuators 154, as illustrated in
In some applications, it may be desirable to confirm operating configurations of the service tool 36. The tracking of pressure changes in the tubing and/or the annulus can confirm specific changes in operating configuration. For example, changing the valve configuration from a reverse configuration, as illustrated in
In the first example, the change from a reverse configuration to a circulate configuration is confirmed by maintaining pressure in tubing interior 118. As the lower valve 62 is opened, a pressure loss is observed. At this stage, a small flow rate is maintained along tubing interior 118. When the upper valve 64 closes, pressure integrity in tubing interior 118 is observed, and pressure is maintained in tubing interior 118. When the port body valve 66 is opened, a pressure loss is again observed. The specific sequence of pressure losses and pressure integrity enables confirmation that the valve position has changed from a reverse configuration to a circulate configuration. Port 116 is closed to facilitate this observation.
In another example, the change from a circulate configuration to a reverse configuration is confirmed by providing a small flow through the annulus. When the lower valve 62 is closed, a pressure integrity in the annulus is observed. At this stage, pressure is maintained on the annulus. When the upper valve 64 is opened, a return flow is observed along tubing interior 118, and a small flow is maintained along the annulus. When the port body valve is closed, no additional losses occur through the crossover port 126. By tracking this specific sequence of events, proper change from a circulate configuration to a reverse configuration can be confirmed. Furthermore, the flow sweeps gravel from the port body valve 66, thereby increasing its operational reliability.
The specific components used in well system 30 can vary depending on the actual well application in which the system is used. Similarly, the specific component or components used in forming the service string 34 and the sandface assembly 38 can vary from one well service application to another. For example, different types and configurations of the valve actuators may be selected while maintaining the ability to shift from one valve configuration to another without moving the service tool 36 within the receptacle of the sandface assembly 38.
Accordingly, although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this invention. Such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/566,459 filed Dec. 4, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2340481 | Lloyd | Feb 1944 | A |
3439740 | Conover | Apr 1969 | A |
5174379 | Whiteley | Dec 1992 | A |
5377750 | Arterbury et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5636691 | Hendrickson | Jun 1997 | A |
5875852 | Floyd et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6148915 | Mullen | Nov 2000 | A |
6216785 | Achee, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230801 | Hill, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6343651 | Bixenman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371210 | Bode et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446729 | Bixenman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488082 | Echols et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6622794 | Zisk, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6702020 | Zachman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719064 | Price-Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749023 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766857 | Bixenman | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782948 | Echols | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786285 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6886634 | Richards | May 2005 | B2 |
6899176 | Hailey | May 2005 | B2 |
6978840 | Henderson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983796 | Bayne et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017664 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7055598 | Ross et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7100690 | Mullen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124824 | Turner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128151 | Corbett | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7210527 | Walker | May 2007 | B2 |
7237616 | Patel | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252152 | LoGiudice | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7331388 | Vilela | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7367395 | Vidrine | May 2008 | B2 |
7383884 | Turner | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7472750 | Walker | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20020070019 | Dusterhoft et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040094304 | Turner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060090900 | Mullen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113089 | Henriksen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0005484 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0165063 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 03023185 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080128130 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11566459 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 11626739 | US |