System and method for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11216814
  • Patent Number
    11,216,814
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 25, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 4, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Plaid Inc. (San Francisco, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Kalinowski; Alexander G
    • Nguyen; Liz P
    Agents
    • Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
Abstract
Systems and methods for programmatic access of a financial institution system. A normalized API request provided by an application system specifies user information corresponding to at least one account endpoint of an external financial institution system. Responsive to the request, at least one application proxy instance associated with the normalized API request is used to collect transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system by providing the financial institution system with a proprietary API request that specifies at least account credentials associated with the user information. The transaction information is included in at least one proprietary API response provided by the financial institution system. A normalized API response is generated based on the collected transaction information and provided to the application system. Each application proxy instance is constructed to simulate an application of the corresponding financial institution system on behalf of a user associated with the application proxy instance.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to the financial transaction field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions in the financial transaction field.


BACKGROUND

Despite various technologies and services providing various financial transaction services and tools, traditional ACH transfers remain a common mechanism for transferring funds between two accounts. Such transfers however, have numerous problems. As a first problem, the user experience requires a user to provide account number and routing number information. This is a cumbersome task for users who frequently do not know this information and may not have the proper documents to access such information. Additionally, the entering of such information is very error prone and can lead to failed transfer, which can result in financial repercussions for one if not more parties involved in the transaction. Beyond that, a common approach to verifying account ownership includes the use of micro-deposits. The micro-deposit adds significant delays to transferring funds and can additionally be a slow and confusing process for involved parties. Thus, there is a need in the financial transaction field to create a new and useful system and method for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a flow chart representation of a method for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions;



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a system of an embodiment;



FIGS. 3 and 4 are variations of API request and response flows of the system;



FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a system of an embodiment;



FIG. 6 is a representation of an application proxy system of an embodiment;



FIG. 7 is a representation of exemplary proxy instances of an embodiment;



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a method of an embodiment;



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of a method of an embodiment;



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of a method of an embodiment; and



FIG. 11 is an architecture diagram of system of an embodiment.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.


1. METHOD FOR FACILITATING PROGRAMMATIC VERIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS

As shown in FIG. 1, a method for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions of a preferred embodiment can include acquiring institution account credentials S110, receiving a transaction request associated with at least one endpoint S120, collecting transaction information of the endpoint S130, and returning a transaction response S140. In some embodiments, the method can include executing the transaction S150, which functions to process the transaction between two endpoints. In some embodiments, the method does not perform execution of the transaction, receiving the transaction request functions to initiate the retrieval of transaction addressing information of the at least one endpoint, collecting transaction information of the endpoint includes collecting transaction addressing information of the endpoint, and returning a transaction response functions to transmit the collected transaction addressing information of the endpoint. The method functions to leverage account access during the transaction process. Variations of the method can be used to add functionality such as verifying account information used in financial transfers, programmatically transferring funds, setting programmatic events, catching errors and fraud, performing conditional processing of a transaction, and/or other suitable operations. The method is preferably used within a financial API platform that provides features related to programmatic financial transaction. Preferably, the financial transactions are automated clearing house (ACH) transactions, but any suitable type of transaction may be used. In a first preferred implementation, the method provides an API resource whereby developers can obtain verified ACH endpoint information. The account number and routing number are obtained as well as verification of ownership of the account. In this variation, the method provides the information to execute the transaction. In another embodiment, the method additionally executes the transaction having obtaining the required information and verification. The method is preferably performed by a system such as the one described below (e.g., the system 200 of FIG. 2), but the method may alternatively be implemented by any suitable system.


Block S110, which includes acquiring institution account credentials, functions to obtain login information for a financial institution (e.g., the financial institution 241 of FIG. 2). The institution account credentials preferably include a username and password. The account is preferably an account of an external financial institution. Additionally, an institution may include additionally authentication challenges such as a pin code, security questions, single-use passwords, secondary device code verification, biometric identification, and/or any suitable form of multi-factor authentication (MFA). Such additional authentication challenges may be collected at the same time of the account credentials, but the MFA authentication process may alternatively be defined in the API protocol. For example, if the primary account credentials are not sufficient, the MFA challenge may returned in a response, this additional credential request can be repeated as required before access to the account is obtained. The institution account credentials can additionally be stored, and automatically used to complete subsequent access or login attempts.


The account credentials are preferably provided through an API request of a developer or application account. The API is preferably used in establishing, setting up, or enrolling a new user account. One end user will preferably have at least one associated financial account, but may be linked or associated with multiple financial accounts. Account credentials are preferably obtained for each financial account.


Block S120, which includes receiving a transaction request associated with at least one endpoint, functions to initiate the retrieval of transaction addressing information of an endpoint. The endpoint is preferably a transaction endpoint, which may be any suitable endpoint from which funds may be withdrawn or deposited. In a common transaction, there is a single withdrawal account and a single deposit account. The method can be used in obtaining information for one or more endpoints. In some variations, there may be a plurality of withdrawal and/or deposit accounts. In one variation, the transaction request is identical to an enroll user request used to obtain the user credentials of block S110. The account credentials may alternatively be previously obtained or obtained in response to the transaction request.


In one variation, the transaction request is for information about an account, the API request preferably specifies an institution and account credentials. Additional credentials may additionally be required such as a pin code, state in which an account was created, or MFA challenge answers. A second request with similar parameters may be submitted to obtain the account credentials for other involved transaction endpoints.


In another variation, the transaction request may explicitly define the transaction details. The transaction request preferably includes at least one withdrawal account endpoint and deposit account endpoint. Account credentials are preferably specified for each endpoint. In one variation, a single API request may include account credentials for both endpoints. In another variation, a transaction resource is used, such that withdrawal endpoint information, deposit account information, and transaction details can be specified asynchronous. For example, a transaction resource is created through an API request. Later, an API request hits the new transaction resource (by specifying a transaction identifier) to specify withdrawal information, then deposit information, and then the amount to be transferred. Once all the information is populated, the transaction may be executed either automatically, in response to an executed command, or scheduled for a later time. Bulk, aggregate, or group transactions may additionally be specified in a request. If multiple entities are withdrawal endpoints, then the division of funds may be specified (e.g., a percentage breakdown or amount break down). Similarly, funds for multiple deposit endpoints may be specified.


Block S130, which includes collecting transaction information of the endpoint, functions to access and determine properties of a transaction endpoint. Collecting transaction information of the endpoint preferably involves using the account credentials to gain account access in a financial institution. Preferably, the account access is facilitated by using a proxy application, which simulates an application accessing the system of an external institution such as in the system and method described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/001,452, filed on 21 May 2014, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The proxy application preferably appears as a first party application instance of the institution, but is actually programmatically controlled communication of the system. The headers, body, encryption, communication protocol negotiation are preferably configured to approximate application communication. The account access can be used to request and obtain account documents that include endpoint information. The account documents may include bank statements or other suitable documents. If the documents are in pdf or other alternative formats, the content is preferably scraped to identify transaction information.


Block S130, which includes collecting transaction information of the endpoint, preferably includes collecting transaction addressing information of the endpoint. The account addressing information is preferably the account number and the routing number of an account. Billing address, wire routing number, and/or other account information can additionally be pulled. In one variation, the account number and routing number are available in banking statements. An extraction script may be used to pull the document and then isolate the information from the document. Accessing the account number and the routing number in an automated fashion preferably avoids chances of error. As a first benefit, access to the account provides evidence of that the owner of the account participated in providing the transaction endpoint information. As another benefit, the information is automatically pulled, which avoids human error.


Collecting transaction information of the endpoint S130 may additionally include collecting transaction status information of the endpoint, which can include indication of fund requirements, account fraud checks, and other status information. Various stages can be built into providing the transaction information, which provide different safeguards and/or features into financial transactions.


In a first optional stage, the transaction status information can determine a sufficient funds status. The sufficient funds status is preferably applied to a withdrawal account to ensure that the account has funds to complete the transaction. Transaction history and/or current fund value may be accessed through the account access. In one variation, the fund amount is returned in the response such that the developer/application can respond appropriately. In another variation, the transaction amount is compared to available funds. If sufficient funds are not found, then an error or warning may be raised.


In another optional stage, the account may be processed for fraud patterns. For example, the age of the account may be accessed. Newly created accounts may be less trustworthy than established accounts with significant history. Similarly transaction history may be assessed for fraudulent behavior. If the account is used for a diverse range of transactions indicative of normal behavior then the account may be identified as normal. If the account only participates in repeated high value transactions or other fraud patterns, then the account may be flagged as fraudulent. Additionally, the entities involved in the transaction may be indicative of fraud.


The method may additionally include verifying transaction conditions during one or more stage. Transaction conditions may be used to take any suitable action. The available actions can include permitting a transaction or preventing a transaction. Additionally, the action can include sending a notification. The notification can include an email, text message, a platform message, a phone call, or any suitable notification. The action may additionally include triggering a programmatic event. In one variation the programmatic event is a callback event, wherein and HTTP message is sent to a destination. Conditions may be customized or selected from a set of provided conditions. Exemplary conditions can include a condition that triggers a notification for transactions over a particular amount; a condition based on available funds after the transaction to alert a user to funds below a threshold; and a condition based on the frequency of transactions or the entities involved in the transaction account. Conditions can be scoped for a developer account, a particular institution account, or for any suitable scope of entities.


Block S140, which includes returning a transaction response functions to transmit the results of the transaction request. The transaction response is preferably made in a synchronous API message that is sent in response to an initial request. Alternatively, a status API resource may be used such that an application/service can periodically check the status API resource to determine the processing status and/or the results. Alternatively, any suitable approach may be used to provide the results to the initial request.


In one preferred implementation, the response provides the addressing information used for a financial endpoint. If there are no errors or warnings with respect to the account, then account information is preferably NACHA compliant as the financial endpoint information was accessed and obtained in a manner that validates the ownership of the account (e.g., by providing credentials and optionally multi-factor authentication responses). The transaction response can include the account number, the routing number, and/or any additional information for the endpoint that is used in executing the transaction. The transaction response may additionally include the available funds, such that the requesting entity can check for sufficient funds. The response may additionally indicate if sufficient funds are available if the transaction amount was provided, which functions to hide the available funds from the requesting entity while preventing overdraft transaction. The transaction response can additionally include other fields such as a status field, where the account may be labeled according to any categorization of the account. For example, the status may indicate that the account is normal or fraudulent.


Additionally or alternatively, the method can include executing the transaction S150, which functions process the transaction between two endpoints. In this variation a request to execute a transaction between at least two endpoints is received. Additionally, returning a transaction response may include returning results of the transaction in the response. In another preferred implementation, the method includes executing the transaction. The transaction response can include information about the status of the transaction when the transaction is submitted, being processed, and/or completed. Transactions may not be instantaneous, and as such the initial transaction response may indicate if the transaction was successfully initiated. Successfully initiated means that the transaction endpoint information was successfully retrieved, that any conditional stages (such as a sufficient funds stage, a fraud-check stage, and custom conditions) are satisfied. A subsequent response or status resource may be updated that reflects the status of the transaction. A transaction resource may be updated with a pending process, when the transaction is initiated and proceeding normally. The transaction resource can be updated with a completed status possibly indicating the time of completion. If an error or issue is encountered, the status of the transaction resource may be updated to reflect the error or issue. The method may additionally include monitoring status of transaction and triggering programmatic event according to the status.


In one variation, executing the transaction can include establishing proxy accounts in at least two institutions, and expediting transactions between the two institutions through a an internal deposit to a first proxy account in a first institution and a second internal deposit from a second proxy account in the second institution. In some cases, transactions between institutions are slower than transactions made within an institution. By establishing cross institution account network, transactions can be facilitated between two accounts in different institutions with similar speeds of internal transactions. The proxy accounts preferably include a funds reserve, which may be periodically balanced between proxy accounts to maintain an operational reserve of funds.


Additionally, the method may be applied to create an abstraction between a user and the underlying account. A transaction endpoint can be abstracted to a user entity, which may be associated with multiple optional transactional endpoints (e.g., different bank accounts). Accordingly, the method may include selecting a financial institution, which functions to dynamically select a connected financial account to participate in a transaction. Various conditions may be set to respond to events when receiving a transaction request, collecting information for the transaction, and/or executing a transaction. In one variation, one financial institution is set as a primary account and another account managed by the same entity is set as a secondary account. If the primary account is not able to complete a transaction, the method preferably detects an error condition and automatically fails over to the secondary account. In another variation, a set of accounts may be preconfigured to be used depending on properties of the request. In combination with the proxy transfer endpoint, the identifying information for the proxy endpoint can be used, but the underlying service automatically will use an automatically selected financial account to use for the funds. For example, a set of entities and/or category of entities/transactions may be set to use particular accounts. Similarly, transactions to one proxy account may be automatically split into transactions with multiple associated accounts. For example, an account holder may set a proxy account to automatically split deposits between two accounts in a 30/70 balance.


2. SYSTEM FOR FACILITATING PROGRAMMATIC VERIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS

As shown in FIG. 2, a system 200 for facilitating programmatic verification of transactions of a preferred embodiment can include an API system 210 and institution integration 231. The system 200 functions to provide an interface for applications and services that can facilitate the process of transferring funds. The system 200 can more particular function to provide verified account information used in ACH transfers, to execute transfer of funds, to enable programmatic events during transfer process, to mitigate risk and errors, and/or provide alternative financial transaction functionality. As a primary implementation, the system 200 is part of a larger financial API platform, which may provide an application programming interface (API) to financial information. In some variations, the system 200 is part of a multi-tenant API platform that enables a plurality of developers to create accounts and build applications and/or services that leverage the API of the financial API platform. In alternative variations, the system 200 is part of a single-tenant API platform and may provide an internal API for a dedicated set of products or services. For example, a product may be built on top of the financial API platform that enables end users to create accounts to manage finances with one or more financial institutions (banks, credit card companies, investment managers, etc.).


The API service 210 functions to provide an interface for accessing financial institution transaction endpoint information. The API service 210 can additionally provide normalized customer/user facing interface. In one preferred implementation the API service 210 can be substantially similar to the API service and system described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/001,452, incorporated above. Preferably the API service 210 leverages an application proxy instance 221, which simulates a proprietary native application accessing a closed API of a financial institution (e.g., the financial institution 241 of FIG. 2). The system 200 can include additional components or services that particularly facilitate the access of information relating to a financial transaction endpoint. For example, a service, script, or module can be configured to access statements or other suitable documents that can contain endpoint information such as account number and routing number information. The statements or information may be contained in pdf or other suitable document formats. The system 200 can include document readers that can access and extract the requested information from the statements.


The API service 210 is preferably a RESTful API but may alternatively be any suitable API such as SOAP or custom protocol. The RESTful API works according to an HTTP request and response model. HTTP requests (or any suitable request communication) to the communication platform preferably observe the principles of a RESTful design. RESTful is understood in this document to describe a Representational State Transfer architecture as is known in the art. The RESTful HTTP requests are preferably stateless, thus each message communicated contains all necessary information for processing the request and generating a response. The API service 210 can include various resources, which act as mechanisms for specifying requested information or requesting particular actions. The resources can be expressed as URI's or resource paths. The RESTful API resources can additionally be responsive to different types of HTTP methods such as GET, PUT, POST and/or DELETE. Alternative implementations may use an internal interface and provide a user-facing interface such as a graphical user interface in a web application or native application.


In one variation, the API service 210 allows an API request to specify an account, and a response output provides the information related to executing a transaction with the endpoint. In one exemplary implementation, the API service 210 can include at least one API resource for interacting with transaction endpoint. As shown in FIG. 3, an endpoint information request can include institution credentials of an account. The credentials can include username and password. The API protocol can additionally provide a mechanism for completing multi-factor authentication challenges such as security questions, or code-based multi-factor authentication. The API request may additionally include other properties such as developer account identifiers, API authentication tokens, institution type identifiers, and other suitable parameters. The response is preferably a data object that includes at least automatically obtained information such as tracking number, routing number, and/or wire routing number. Additional response information can include funds amount (or alternatively a Boolean indicator of if the funds are sufficient), an account status (e.g., is the account fraudulent, trusted, etc.), billing address of the account, name of the institution, type of account (e.g., saving, depository, etc.), and other suitable properties. Other API properties or features can include a mechanism to specify if endpoint information is requested or if the transaction should be executed.


An institution interface module (institution integration system) (e.g., 231 of FIG. 2) functions to model the internal interface of at least one application with an external institution (e.g., 241). The account credentials of a financial institution account (and optionally multi-factor authentication credentials) can be used for an application proxy to gain access to an institution through the institution interface module. An institution interface module is preferably established for each institution (e.g., 241) with which the system 200 can interface. For example, an institution interface module may exist for each bank and/or credit card company that is available in the system. The institution interface module (e.g., 231) is preferably a set of rules and processes of a particular institution. The institution interface module preferably includes a proxy sub-module that defines how the institution recognizes and/or authenticates a particular application. Some banks may depend on the MAC address of a device; some depend on asymmetric cryptography tokens; while others may generate encrypted tokens. The proxy sub-module is preferably used in establishing the proxy instance information. The institution interface module can additionally include institution protocol sub-module, which defines a mapping between provided API functionality and the form and mode of communication with the external institution. The institution protocol sub-module can define the headers, body, and other properties of messages sent to the associated institution. The protocol sub-module may additionally define how data should be processed to form that message. In some cases, the data may be encrypted in a standard or proprietary format, which the protocol sub-module can define. Additionally, the protocol sub-module can define the communication flow to fulfill a request. In some cases, multiple requests may need to be made to complete a request objective. Other aspects of dealing with an interface of an external institution may additionally be built into the institution interface module such as multi-factor authentication rules. An institution interface module (e.g., 231) is preferably constructed based on use of an actual application (e.g., the application 553 of FIG. 5). The communication and/or the source code can be parsed and analyzed to establish some or all of an institution interface module.


The system 200 may additionally include a transaction engine 291, which can facilitate the transfer of funds between two accounts. The transaction engine 291 can be integrated with the API service 210, such that an API request can direct the execution of a transaction. The transaction engine 291 preferably can execute ACH transactions, but may alternatively or additionally use other financial tools to withdrawal funds and/or deposit funds. With a transaction engine, transactions can be executed between two accounts that have been configured with account credentials, the API response may include the status of the transaction, transaction errors, a status URI or any suitable response to facilitate executing a transaction as shown in FIG. 4. In one variation, proxy accounts can be used in different institutions. With sufficient reserves, transfers between institutions can be expedited by transferring funds to and from the proxy accounts, and then asynchronously updating the proxy accounts.


The system 200 can additionally include other components such as a messaging/notification system, which can manage alerts and/or triggering programmatic events (e.g., callbacks). The system 200 may additionally or alternatively include any suitable components


3. FINANCIAL PLATFORM SYSTEM

As shown in FIG. 5, a multi-tenant financial platform system 500 of an embodiment includes an application programming interface (API) service 510, an application proxy system 520, and at least one institution interface module (e.g., the modules 531-533 of FIG. 5). The API service 510 is similar to the API service 210FIG. 2. The application proxy system 520 includes application proxy instances similar to the application proxy instance 221 of FIG. 2. The institution interface modules 531-533 of FIG. 5 are similar to the institution interface module 231 of FIG. 2.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 includes a transaction engine 521. In some implementations, the transaction engine 521 is similar to the transaction engine 291 of FIG. 2.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 includes a document processing engine 522. In some implementations, the document processing engine 522 is constructed to process financial documents (e.g., the financial documents 592) of a financial institution system (e.g., 542) of a user account of the financial institution system to identify transaction information. In some implementations, in a case where the financial documents are in a PDF format, the document processing engine 522 is constructed to scrape content of the PDF financial documents to identify the transaction information. In some implementations, the document processing engine 521 is an extraction script that is constructed to pull the financial document and then isolate the transaction information from the document (e.g., as described above for block S130 of FIG. 1). In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 accesses the financial document, stores the accessed financial document (e.g., in a memory 1122 of FIG. 11, a storage medium 1105 of FIG. 11, and the like, of the financial platform system 500), and then controls the document processing engine to process the stored financial document to identify the transaction information.


As shown in FIG. 5, the financial institution system 541 includes a public Web browser interface 591 for accessing the financial institution system 541 via a Web Browser (or any suitable Web client) (e.g., the web browser 581 of the user device 573). As described below for FIGS. 8-10, the methods of FIGS. 8-10 provide access to the financial institution system 541 via a private, proprietary API (e.g., 561), as opposed to access via the public Web browser interface 591. In some implementations, the Web browser interface 591 is a web server that hosts a web site for access of the financial institution system via a Web browser over the Internet.


As shown in FIG. 5, the application proxy system 520 includes application proxy instances (e.g., proxy instances 621-625) for user accounts (e.g., user accounts 611, 612 and 613) of developer accounts (e.g., Dev Account B 631 and Dev Account A 632) at the financial platform system 500. The application proxy system 520 includes an application proxy instance management module 641 that is constructed to generate application proxy instances, configure application proxy instances, and remove application proxy instances.


In some implementations, each application proxy instance (e.g., proxy instances 621-625) specifies the developer account, the user account of the developer account, the associated financial institution system, and credentials of the user account for the financial institution system, as shown in FIG. 7. In some implementations, some application proxy instances specify at least one token for access to a respective financial institution system. In some implementations, the financial institution system provides the application proxy instance with a token for access to the financial institution system after establishment of a session between the application proxy instance and the financial institution system by using the credentials of the user account for the financial institution system. In some implementations, each application proxy instance specifies properties of the application proxy instance. In some implementations, properties include one or more of a unique user identifier code, an authentication token, a MAC address (e.g., a MAC address of a user device 571-572), or any suitable information.


In some implementations, each proprietary API (e.g., 561-563) is different from a web browser interface (e.g., 591) used by a web browser (e.g., 581).


3.1 Multi-Tenant Financial Platform System


As shown in FIG. 5, the financial platform system is a multi-tenant financial platform system, and each financial application 551 and 552 is of an application system that is external to the financial platform system 500. In some implementations, each external application system (e.g., the application system of the application 552) is associated with an account (e.g., “Dev Account A”, “Dev Account B” of FIG. 7) of the financial platform system 500. In some implementations, each application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625 of FIGS. 6 and 7) of the application proxy system 520 is associated with an account (e.g., “Dev Account A”, “Dev Account B”) of the financial platform system (e.g., an account of the of the financial platform system that is associated with an external application system). FIG. 7 depicts exemplary application proxy instances that are associated with respective accounts (e.g., “Dev Account A”, “Dev Account B”) of the financial platform system 500. In some implementations, each application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) associated with an external financial application system is constructed to provide a proprietary financial API request to a respective external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543) on behalf of a user (e.g., “User A”, “User B” of FIGS. 5-7) of the external application system by simulating an application (e.g., 553 of FIG. 5) of the external financial institution system.


3.2 Single-Tenant Financial Platform System


In some implementations, the financial platform system is a single-tenant financial platform system, and the financial applications are included in a financial application system of the financial platform system 500. Each application proxy instance is constructed to provide a proprietary financial API request to the respective external financial institution system on behalf of a user of the application system (of the financial platform system) by simulating an application of the external financial institution system.


4. METHOD FOR PROCESSING A NORMALIZED FINANCIAL API REQUEST TO PROVIDE TRANSACTION INFORMATION OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNT ENDPOINTS BASED ON ACCOUNT CREDENTIALS

As shown in FIG. 8, a method Boo for processing a normalized API request at a financial platform system (e.g., the financial platform system 500) includes: receiving a normalized financial API request associated with at least one financial account endpoint, the normalized financial API request being provided by an external financial application system (e.g., a financial application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5) by using a financial platform API (e.g., 510 of FIG. 5) of the financial platform system, the normalized financial API request specifying account credentials of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request (process S810). Responsive to the normalized financial API request: transaction information of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request is collected by using an application proxy instance (e.g., a proxy instance 621-625 of FIG. 6) associated with the financial account endpoint to collect the transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system (e.g., an external financial institution system 541-543 of FIG. 5) by using the associated account credentials specified by the normalized financial API request and a proprietary Application Programming Interface (API) (e.g., one of the proprietary APIs 561-563 of FIG. 5) of the financial institution system (process S820); and a normalized financial API response is provided to the external financial application system (process S830). The normalized financial API response provides the transaction information of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request. Each application proxy instance is constructed to simulate an application (e.g., application 553 of FIG. 5) of the corresponding external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the collected transaction information for each financial account endpoint includes at least an account number and a corresponding routing number for use in automated clearing house (ACH) transactions.


In some implementations, the transaction information is collected by processing at least one financial statement accessed from the corresponding external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system includes an institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) for each external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543), each institution interface module models the proprietary API of the external financial institution system, and each application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) uses a corresponding institution interface module to collect the transaction information from the external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system generates each institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) by at least one of: parsing source code of the application (e.g., the application 553 of FIG. 5) of the associated external financial institution system; and parsing communication between the application and the associated external financial institution system.


In some implementations, each institution interface module defines headers of messages sent to the associated external financial institution system.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 8, the method Boo is implemented by the financial platform system 500. In the example embodiment, the financial platform system is constructed to programmatically access transaction information as described herein for the method Boo.


4.1 Normalized Financial API Request


The process S810, which includes receiving a normalized financial API request associated with at least one financial account endpoint, functions to control the financial platform system 500 to receive the normalized financial API by using the API 510 of the financial platform system 500. In the embodiment of FIG. 8, the normalized financial API request is provided by an external financial application system (e.g., a financial application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5). In other embodiments, the normalized financial API request is provided by an internal financial application system of the financial platform system 500. The normalized financial API request specifies account credentials of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is received as described above for the process S120 of FIG. 1.


4.2 Collecting Transaction Information


The process S820, which includes collecting transaction information of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request, is performed responsive to the normalized financial API request. The process S820 functions to control the financial platform system 500 to use an application proxy instance associated with a financial account endpoint (of the normalized API request) to collect the transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system. The application proxy instance collects the transaction information by using the associated account credentials specified by the normalized financial API request and a proprietary API (e.g., one of the proprietary APIs 561-563 of FIG. 5) of the financial institution system.


In the example embodiment, the application proxy system 520 includes application proxy instances for each financial institution system corresponding to the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the transaction information is collected as described above for the process S130 of FIG. 1.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 collects the transaction information by using an application proxy instance (e.g., 623 of FIG. 6) associated with a financial account endpoint (of the normalized API request) to access a financial document (e.g., one of the financial documents 592 of FIG. 5) that specifies the requested transaction information. The application proxy instance accesses the financial document by using the associated account credentials specified by the normalized financial API request and a proprietary API (e.g., one of the proprietary APIs 561-563 of FIG. 5) of a financial institution system (e.g., 542) that manages the financial document (e.g., one of the documents 592). The financial platform system 500 stores the accessed financial document (e.g., in a memory 1122 of FIG. 11, a storage medium 1105 of FIG. 11), and controls the document processing engine 522 to process the stored financial document (e.g., one of the stored documents 1101 of FIG. 11) to identify the transaction information. In some implementations, the document processing engine 522 processes the stored financial document by scraping content of financial document to identify the transaction information. In some implementations, the document processing engine 521 performs OCR (optical character recognition) to identify the transaction information included in the financial document.


4.3 Generation of an Application Proxy Instance


In the example embodiment of FIG. 8, each application proxy instance is generated by the management module 641 of FIG. 6. In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 generates each application proxy instance as described above for the process Silo of FIG. 1. In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 generates each application proxy instance responsive to a normalized API request for enrolling a new user account, as described above for the process Silo of FIG. 1.


In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 generates the application proxy instance responsive to a request to generate an application proxy instance. In some implementations, the request to generate an application proxy instance specifies information identifying an external financial institution system, and a user account of an application system (e.g., a user account of an application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5). In some implementations, the request to generate an application proxy instance specifies user credentials for the financial institution system. In some implementations, the request to generate an application proxy instance specifies information identifying an account of the financial platform system 500 associated with the application system. In some implementations, the request to generate an application proxy instance specifies properties for the application proxy instance. In some implementations, properties for the application proxy instance include at least one of a unique user identifier code, an authentication token, a MAC address (e.g., a MAC address of a user device 571-572), financial accounts of the corresponding financial institution system, and any other suitable information.


In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 stores the generated application proxy instance in association with a user account of an application system (e.g., a user account of an application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5, e.g., “User B” of FIG. 7). In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 stores the generated application proxy instance in association with an account (e.g., “Dev Account B” of FIG. 7) of the financial platform system 500 associated with an application system (e.g., an application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5). In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 stores the generated application proxy instance in association with an account of the financial platform system 500 associated with an application system, and a user account of the application system. In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 stores the generated application proxy instance in association with an account of the financial platform system 500 associated with an application system (e.g., “Dev Account B” of FIG. 7), a user account of the application system (e.g., “User B” of FIG. 7), and information identifying the financial institution system of the application proxy instance (e.g., “Bank2”). In some implementations, the application proxy instance management module 641 stores the generated application proxy instance in association with an account of the financial platform system 500 associated with an application system, a user account of the application system, information identifying the financial institution system of the application proxy instance, and information identifying financial accounts of the application proxy instance.


In some implementations, generating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 641 to construct the application proxy instance to simulate communication of an application (e.g., application 553 of FIG. 5) of the external financial institution system (of the application proxy instance) with the financial institution system on behalf of the user account of the application system.


In some implementations, generating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 641 to register the generated application proxy instance with the external financial institution system.


In some implementations, generating the application proxy instance includes controlling the application proxy instance management module 641 to negotiate registration of the application proxy instance with the financial institution system.


In some implementations, the request to generate an application proxy instance is provided by an application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5). In some implementations, the request to create an application proxy instance is provided by an application system (e.g., an external application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5) responsive to user input received at a user device (e.g., 571, 572) executing machine-readable instructions of an application (e.g., 552 of FIG. 5) of the application system.


4.4 Providing Transaction Information


The process S830, which includes providing a normalized financial API response to the external financial application system, is performed responsive to the normalized financial API request. The process S830 functions to control the financial platform system 500 to provide the normalized financial API response, which includes the transaction information of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the transaction information is provided as described above for the process S140 of FIG. 1.


5. METHOD FOR PROCESSING A NORMALIZED FINANCIAL API REQUEST TO EXECUTE A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION FOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNT ENDPOINTS

As shown in FIG. 9, a method 900 for processing a normalized API request at a financial platform system (e.g., the financial platform system 500) includes: receiving a normalized financial API request associated with at least one financial account endpoint (process S910). The normalized financial API request is provided by an external financial application system by using a financial platform API of the financial platform system. The normalized financial API request specifies a financial transaction and at least one of an account token and account credentials of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request.


Responsive to the normalized financial API request, transaction information of each financial account endpoint of the normalized financial API request is collected (process S920). The transaction information is collected by using an application proxy instance associated with the financial account endpoint to collect the transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system by using at least one of an associated account token and associated account credentials specified by the normalized financial API request and by using a proprietary API of the financial institution system. The transaction specified by the normalized financial API request is executed by using the collected transaction information (process S930). A normalized financial API response is provided to the external system (process S940). The normalized financial API response provides results of the transaction. Each application proxy instance is constructed to simulate an application of the corresponding external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the collected transaction information for each financial account endpoint includes at least an account number and a corresponding routing number for use in automated clearing house (ACH) transactions.


In some implementations, the transaction information is collected by processing at least one financial statement accessed from the corresponding external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system includes an institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) for each external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543), each institution interface module models the proprietary API of the external financial institution system, and each application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) uses a corresponding institution interface module to collect the transaction information from the external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system generates each institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) by at least one of: parsing source code of the application (e.g., the application 553 of FIG. 5) of the associated external financial institution system; and parsing communication between the application and the associated external financial institution system.


In some implementations, each institution interface module defines headers of messages sent to the associated external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is received as described above for the process S80 of FIG. 8. In some implementations, the transaction information is collected as described above for the process S820 of FIG. 8. In some implementations, the transaction information is provided as described above for the process S140 of FIG. 1. In some implementations, the transaction information is executed as described above for the process S150 of FIG. 1.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 9, the method 900 is implemented by the financial platform system 500. In the example embodiment, the financial platform system is constructed to programmatically access transaction information as described herein for the method 900.


6. METHOD FOR PROCESSING A NORMALIZED FINANCIAL API REQUEST BASED ON USER INFORMATION


FIG. 10 depicts a method woo for processing a normalized API request at a financial platform system (e.g., the financial platform system 500). The financial platform system is constructed to programmatically access at least one external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543) external to the financial platform system. The processes S1010, S1020, and S1030 of the method 1000 of FIG. 10 are performed responsive to a normalized financial API request provided by a financial application system (e.g., a financial application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5) by using a financial platform API (e.g., 510 of FIG. 5) of the financial platform system (e.g., 500). The normalized financial API request specifies user information corresponding to at least one financial account endpoint of at least one external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543 of FIG. 5).


The process S1010 includes using at least one application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized API request to collect transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system by providing the financial institution system with a proprietary financial API request that specifies at least account credentials associated with the user information specified by the normalized financial API request. The transaction information is included in at least one proprietary financial API response provided by the financial institution system.


The process S1020 includes generating a normalized financial API response based on the collected transaction information. The process S1030 includes providing the normalized financial API response to the financial application system.


Each application proxy instance is constructed to simulate an application (e.g., 553 of FIG. 5) of the corresponding financial institution system on behalf of a user associated with the application proxy instance.


In some implementations, each proprietary API (e.g., 561-563) is a private API of the respective financial institution system, and each proprietary API is different from a web browser interface (e.g., 591 of FIG. 5).


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is provided on behalf of a user account of the financial application system (e.g., the application system of the application 552 of FIG. 5), and the specified user information includes information associated with the user account.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is provided on behalf of a user account of the financial application system, and the specified user information includes information associated with a user that is different from a user of the user account of the financial application system.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request for financial account endpoint information, and each proprietary financial API request is a request for financial account endpoint information, and wherein the transaction information includes financial account endpoint information.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request to transfer funds from at least one withdrawal account endpoint to at least one deposit account endpoint and the normalized financial API request specifies an amount of funds to be transferred.


In some implementations, the collected transaction information for each financial account endpoint includes at least an account number and a corresponding routing number for use in automated clearing house (ACH) transactions.


In some implementations, the transaction information is collected by processing at least one financial statement accessed from the corresponding external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system includes an institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) for each external financial institution system (e.g., 541-543), each institution interface module models the proprietary API of the external financial institution system, and each application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) uses a corresponding institution interface module to collect the transaction information from the external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system generates each institution interface module (e.g., 531-533 of FIG. 5) by at least one of: parsing source code of the application (e.g., the application 553 of FIG. 5) of the associated external financial institution system; and parsing communication between the application and the associated external financial institution system.


In some implementations, each institution interface module defines headers of messages sent to the associated external financial institution system.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is received as described above for the process S810 of FIG. 8. In some implementations, the transaction information is collected as described above for the process S820 of FIG. 8. In some implementations, the transaction information is collected as described above for the process S130 of FIG. 1. In some implementations, the transaction information is provided as described above for the process S140 of FIG. 1.


In the example embodiment of FIG. 10, the method 1000 is implemented by the financial platform system 500. In the example embodiment, the financial platform system is constructed to programmatically access transaction information as described herein for the method woo.


6.1 Collecting Transaction Information


The process S1010, which includes using at least one application proxy instance associated with the normalized API request to collect transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system, functions to control the financial platform system 500 to use at least one application proxy instance (e.g., 623) associated with the normalized API request to collect transaction information from a corresponding financial institution system (e.g., 542) by providing the financial institution system with a proprietary financial API request that specifies at least account credentials associated with the user information specified by the normalized financial API request. The transaction information is included in at least one proprietary financial API response provided by the financial institution system (e.g., 542).


In some implementations, each proprietary financial API response provides a financial document (e.g., one of the financial documents 592) of a user corresponding to the account credentials of the associated proprietary financial API request, and each financial document includes the requested transaction information. The financial platform system 500 stores the financial documents of each proprietary financial API response (e.g., in a memory 1122 of FIG. 11, a storage medium 1105 of FIG. 11), and controls the document processing engine 522 to process each stored financial document (e.g., one of the stored documents 1101 of FIG. 11) to identify the transaction information. In some implementations, the document processing engine 522 processes the stored financial document by scraping content of financial document to identify the transaction information. In some implementations, the document processing engine 521 performs OCR (optical character recognition) to identify the transaction information included in the financial document.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines application proxy instances (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized financial API request. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines application proxy instances (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized financial API request by using the application proxy system 520.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines application proxy instances (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized financial API request based on the user information specified by the normalized financial API request.


6.2 Generating a Normalized Financial API Response


The process S1020, which includes generating a normalized financial API response based on the collected transaction information, functions to control the financial platform system 500 to generate a normalized financial API response to the normalized financial API request. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 generates the normalized financial API response to include the transaction information collected from each proprietary financial API response provided by an external financial institution system. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 generates the normalized financial API response based on parameters included in the normalized financial API request. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 generates the normalized financial API response based on properties of the application proxy instances used to collect the transaction information.


In some implementations, in a case where the normalized financial API request is a request to transfer funds from at least one withdrawal account endpoint to at least one deposit account endpoint, the process S1020 includes using a transaction engine (e.g., 521 of FIG. 5) of the financial platform system 500 to execute an ACH transaction to transfer a specified amount of funds from at least one withdrawal account endpoint to at least one deposit account endpoint by using transaction information collected at the process S1010. In some implementations, the transaction information includes financial account endpoint information. The financial platform system 500 generates the normalized financial API response to include at least one of a status of the transfer and results of the transfer.


In some implementations, in a case where the normalized financial API request is a request to transfer funds from at least one withdrawal account endpoint to at least one deposit account endpoint, the transaction information collected from each proprietary financial API response provided by an external financial institution system corresponds to financial account endpoint information of each withdrawal account endpoint and deposit account endpoint of the normalized financial API request. The application platform system uses the transaction engine 521 to perform the transfer of funds from each withdrawal account endpoint to each respective deposit account endpoint by using the collected financial account endpoint information. The financial platform system 500 generates the normalized financial API response to include at least one of a status of the transfer and results of the requested transfer of funds.


6.3 Providing a Normalized Financial API Response


In some implementations, the process S1030, which includes providing the normalized financial API response to the financial application system, functions to control the financial platform system 500 to provide the normalized financial API response by using the API 510. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 provides the normalized financial API response as described above for FIGS. 8 and 9.


6.4 Request for Transaction Information


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request for transaction information. In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request for transaction information for one user for one external financial intuition. In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request for transaction information for one user for more than one external financial intuition. In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request for transaction information for more than one user for one or more respective external financial intuitions.


6.4.1 Request for Transaction Information for a User Identified by a User Account Identifier


In some implementations, the user information of the normalized financial API request includes a user account identifier for each user account of the application system (e.g., the application system of the financial application 552 of FIG. 5) corresponding to the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 1.










TABLE 1





NORMALIZED FINANCIAL



API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION







<Financial Platform Account ID>
An account of an external financial



application system (e.g., “Dev



Account A”, “Dev Account



B” of FIGS. 5-7).


<User Account Identifier>
An identifier that identifies a user



account of the application system



identified by the <Financial Platform



Account ID> parameter.


<Financial Institution ID>
An identifier that identifies an



external financial institution system



(e.g., 541-543 of FIG. 5).









In some implementations, the <User Account Identifier> is used to select at least one corresponding application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625), and each selected application proxy instance includes user credentials (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 7) to access the associated financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines an application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized API request based on the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, the <User Account Identifier> parameter, and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 identifies an application proxy instance of the application proxy system 520 that is managed in association with the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, the <User Account Identifier> parameter, and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, and uses the identified application proxy instance to collect the transaction information.


For example, in a case where the application proxy system 520 manages application proxy instances 621-625 as shown in FIG. 7, for a normalized financial API request that specifies “Dev Account B” as the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, “User A” as the <User Account Identifier> parameter, and “Bank 1” as the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, the financial platform system 500 selects the application proxy instance 621, and uses the <User A Credentials Bank 1> as the user credentials for the proprietary financial API request provided to the external financial system 541 (“Bank 1”) of FIG. 5.


In some implementations, each proprietary financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 2.










TABLE 2





PROPRIETARY FINANCIAL



API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION







<User Credentials>
The user credentials of the



corresponding normalized financial



API request. The user credentials are



specified by the application proxy



instance, e.g., 621-625, (e.g., as shown



in FIG. 7) used to provide the



proprietary financial API request.










6.4.2 Request for Transaction Information for a User Identified by User Credentials


In some implementations, the user information of the normalized financial API request includes at least one set of user credentials for each user account of the application system (e.g., the application system of the financial application 552 of FIG. 5) corresponding to the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 3.










TABLE 3





NORMALIZED FINANCIAL



API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION







<Financial Platform Account ID>
An account of an external financial



application system (e.g., “Dev



Account A”, “Dev Account



B” of FIGS. 5-7).


<User Credentials >
Financial institution Credentials



of a user of the financial institution



system identified by the <Financial



Institution ID> parameter.


<Financial Institution ID>
An identifier that identifies an



external financial institution



system (e.g., 541-543 of FIG. 5).









In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines an application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized API request based on the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 identifies an application proxy instance of the application proxy system 520 that is managed in association with the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, and uses the identified application proxy instance to collect the transaction information.


In some implementations in which the normalized financial API request includes at least one set of user credentials, rather than using an application proxy instance, the financial platform system 500 identifies an institution interface module (e.g., 531-533) of the financial institution system identified by the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, and uses the identified institution interface module to collect the transaction information.


In some implementations, each proprietary financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 4.












TABLE 4







PROPRIETARY FINANCIAL




API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION









<User Credentials>
The user credentials of the




corresponding normalized




financial API request.











6.4.3 Request for Transaction Information for a User Identified by a User Account Token


In some implementations, the user information of the normalized financial API request includes a user account token for each user account of the application system (e.g., the application system of the financial application 552 of FIG. 5) corresponding to the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 5.










TABLE 5





NORMALIZED FINANCIAL



API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION







<Financial Platform Account ID>
An account of an external financial



application system (e.g., “Dev



Account A”, “Dev Account



B” of FIGS. 5-7).


<User Account Token>
An account token that identifies



a user account of the application



system identified by the <Financial



Platform Account ID> parameter. In



some implementations, the account



token is provided in a response to



a request to enroll the user account



of the application system at the



application platform system, as



described above for S110 of FIG. 1.


<Financial Institution ID>
An identifier that identifies an



external financial institution system



(e.g., 541-543 of FIG. 5).









In some implementations, each application proxy instance is stored in association with a respective user account token. In some implementations, each application proxy instance is stored in association with information that identifies a respective user account token. In some implementations, each account token is stored at the financial platform system 500 in association with a user account identifier.


In some implementations, the <User Account Token> is used to select at least one corresponding application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625), and each selected application proxy instance includes user credentials (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 7) to access the associated financial institution system. In some implementations, a user account identifier corresponding to the <User Account Token> is determined, and the determined user account identifier is used to select at least one corresponding application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625), and each selected application proxy instance includes user credentials (e.g., as depicted in FIG. 7) to access the associated financial institution system.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines an application proxy instance (e.g., 621-625) associated with the normalized API request based on the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, the <User Account Token> parameter, and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter. In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 identifies an application proxy instance of the application proxy system 520 that is managed in association with the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, the <User Account Token> parameter, and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, and uses the identified application proxy instance to collect the transaction information.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 determines a user account identifier associated with the user account token, and identifies an application proxy instance of the application proxy system 520 that is managed in association with the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, the determined user account identifier, and the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, and uses the identified application proxy instance to collect the transaction information.


For example, in a case where the application proxy system 520 manages application proxy instances 621-625 as shown in FIG. 7, for a normalized financial API request that specifies “Dev Account B” as the <Financial Platform Account ID> parameter, a <User Account Token> parameter associated with “User A”, and “Bank 1” as the <Financial Institution ID> parameter, the financial platform system 500 selects the application proxy instance 621, and uses the <User A Credentials Bank 1> as the user credentials for the proprietary financial API request provided to the external financial system 541 (“Bank 1”) of FIG. 5.


In some implementations, each proprietary financial API request includes parameters as shown in Table 6.










TABLE 6





PROPRIETARY FINANCIAL



API REQUEST PARAMETER
DESCRIPTION







<User Credentials>
The user credentials of the



corresponding normalized



financial API request. The



user credentials are specified



by the application proxy



instance, e.g., 621-625,



(e.g., as shown in FIG. 7) used



to provide the proprietary



financial API request.










6.5 Request to Transfer Funds


In some implementations, the normalized financial API request is a request to transfer funds from at least one withdrawal account endpoint to at least one deposit account endpoint. In some implementations, each endpoint is identified by user information specified by the normalized financial API transfer request. In some implementations, user information for an endpoint includes at least one of a user account identifier, a user account token, and user credentials. In some implementations, one or more endpoints are identified by financial account endpoint information (e.g., an account number and corresponding routing number) specified by the normalized financial API transfer request and one or more endpoints are identified by user information specified by the normalized financial API transfer request. In some implementations, the normalized financial API request specifies an amount of funds to be transferred. In some implementations, the normalized financial API request specifies an originating financial institution system that initiates the transfer of funds.


In some implementations, the financial platform system 500 processes a normalized financial API request to transfer funds by determining withdrawal account endpoints and deposit account endpoints specified by the normalized financial API request to transfer funds. For each endpoint identified by user information of the normalized financial API request, the financial platform system 500 collects transaction information as described above for processes S130 of FIG. 1, S820 of FIG. 8, S920 of FIG. 9, and Sioio of FIG. 10. Responsive to collection of the transaction information for each endpoint identified by user information, a transaction engine (e.g., the transaction engine 521 of FIG. 5) of the financial platform system 500 is used to execute the transfer of funds in accordance with one or more parameters (e.g., amount of funds, originating financial institution system, and the like) of the normalized financial API request to transfer funds. In some implementations, the funds are transferred by executing an ACH transaction to transfer the specified amount of funds from one or more withdrawal account endpoints to one or more deposit account endpoints. In some implementations, the transaction engine initiates the transfer of funds from an originating financial institution system specified by the normalized financial API request. In some implementations, a normalized financial API response (to the normalized financial API request to transfer funds) includes at least one of a status of the transfer and results of the transfer of funds.


In some implementations, in a case where more than one withdrawal account endpoint is specified by the normalized financial API transfer request, the financial platform system 500 selects one or more of the withdrawal account endpoints for the transfer based on at least one of capabilities of the withdrawal account endpoints, availability of the withdrawal account endpoints, configuration for the withdrawal account endpoints, and parameters of the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, in a case where more than one deposit account endpoint is specified by the normalized financial API transfer request, the financial platform system 500 selects one or more of the deposit account endpoints for the transfer based on at least one of capabilities of the deposit account endpoints, availability of the deposit account endpoints, configuration for the deposit account endpoints, and parameters of the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, in a case where a user (identified by a user account identifier, a user account token, or a set of user credentials) specified by the normalized financial API transfer request is associated with multiple account endpoints (e.g., a user has accounts at different financial institution systems, or multiple accounts at one financial institution system), the financial platform system 500 selects one or more of the endpoints associated with the user for the transfer based on at least one of capabilities of the account endpoints, availability of the account endpoints, configuration for the account endpoints, and parameters of the normalized financial API request.


In some implementations, one endpoint of a user is configured as a primary account and another account of the user is configured as a secondary account. In a case where the transaction engine 521 cannot complete the transfer by using the primary account, the transaction engine 521 selects the secondary account for use in execution of the transfer.


In some implementations, a set of accounts may be preconfigured to be used depending on properties of the normalized financial API transfer request. In some implementations, the normalized financial API transfer request specifies user information that identifies a proxy transfer endpoint, and the financial platform system 500 automatically selects a financial account to use for the transfer of funds based on configuration information of the proxy transfer endpoint.


In some implementations, during processing of a normalized financial API transfer request that specifies a proxy transfer endpoint, the financial platform system 500 automatically splits the requested transaction into multiple sub-transactions by using multiple accounts associated with the proxy transfer endpoint, in accordance with configuration for the proxy transfer endpoint. For example, an account holder may set a proxy transfer endpoint to automatically split deposits between two accounts in a 30/70 balance.


6.5.1 Request to Transfer Funds by Using Proxy Accounts


In some implementations, the transaction engine 522 executes the transfer by establishing proxy accounts in at least two institutions, and expedites transactions between the two institutions through a an internal deposit to a first proxy account in a first institution and a second internal deposit from a second proxy account in the second institution. In some implementations, the proxy accounts include a funds reserve, which may be periodically balanced between proxy accounts to maintain an operational reserve of funds.


7. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE: FINANCIAL PLATFORM SYSTEM


FIG. 11 is an architecture diagram of a system (e.g., the system 200 of FIG. 2, the financial platform system 500 of FIG. 5) according to an implementation in which the system is implemented by a server device. In some implementations, the system is implemented by a plurality of devices.


The bus 1101 interfaces with the processors 1101A-1101N, the main memory (e.g., a random access memory (RAM)) 1122, a read only memory (ROM) 1104, a processor-readable storage medium 1105, a display device 1107, a user input device 1108, and a network device 1111.


The processors 1101A-1101N may take many forms, such as ARM processors, X86 processors, and the like.


In some implementations, the system (e.g., 500) includes at least one of a central processing unit (processor) and a multi-processor unit (MPU).


The processors 1101A-1101N and the main memory 1122 form a processing unit 1199. In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium; the one or more processors of the processing unit receive instructions stored by the one or more of a RAM, ROM, and machine-readable storage medium via a bus; and the one or more processors execute the received instructions. In some embodiments, the processing unit is an ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). In some embodiments, the processing unit is a SoC (System-on-Chip). In some embodiments, the processing unit includes one or more of an API Service, an application proxy system, one or more instance interface modules, financial documents, a transaction engine, and a document processing engine.


The network adapter device 1111 provides one or more wired or wireless interfaces for exchanging data and commands between the system (e.g., 500) and other devices, such as financial institution systems (e.g., 541-543), user devices (e.g., 571-572). Such wired and wireless interfaces include, for example, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, Bluetooth interface, Wi-Fi interface, Ethernet interface, near field communication (NFC) interface, and the like.


Machine-executable instructions in software programs (such as an operating system, application programs, and device drivers) are loaded into the memory 1122 (of the processing unit 1199) from the processor-readable storage medium 1105, the ROM 1104 or any other storage location. During execution of these software programs, the respective machine-executable instructions are accessed by at least one of processors 1101A-1101N (of the processing unit 1199) via the bus 1101, and then executed by at least one of processors 1101A-1101N. Data used by the software programs are also stored in the memory 1122, and such data is accessed by at least one of processors 1101A-1101N during execution of the machine-executable instructions of the software programs. The processor-readable storage medium 1105 is one of (or a combination of two or more of) a hard drive, a flash drive, a DVD, a CD, an optical disk, a floppy disk, a flash storage, a solid state drive, a ROM, an EEPROM, an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, and the like. The processor-readable storage medium 1105 includes an operating system 1112, software programs 1113, device drivers 1114, the API Service 510, the application proxy system 520, the institution Interface modules 531-533, and financial documents 1101. In some implementations, the processor-readable storage medium 1105 includes the transaction engine 521 and the document processing engine 522.


8. MACHINES

The system and methods of the preferred embodiment and variations thereof can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the financial application programming interface platform. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer-readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a general or application specific processor, but any suitable dedicated hardware or hardware/firmware combination device can alternatively or additionally execute the instructions.


9. CONCLUSION

As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer system comprising: one or more computer-readable storage devices configured to store a plurality of computer executable instructions; andone or more hardware computer processors in communication with the one or more computer-readable storage devices and configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to cause the computer system to: receive, from a first computing device, a request for data associated with a user, the request including authentication credentials associated with the user;identify an institution associated with the request;instantiate a simulated instance of a software application associated with the institution, wherein the simulated instance of the software application is configured to interface, via an application programming interface (“API”), with a second computing device that is associated with the institution;request, by the simulated instance of the software application and via the API, at least one of: account data, transaction data, or an electronic document associated with the user, from the second computing device;receive the at least one of the account data, the transaction data, or the electronic document from the second computing device; andanalyze the received at least one of the account data, the transaction data, or the electronic document to determine an item of account information.
  • 2. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the item of account information comprises at least one of: a sufficient funds status, or an available funds amount.
  • 3. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the item of account information comprises a fraud pattern.
  • 4. The computer system of claim 3, wherein the fraud pattern comprises at least one of: an account age, a transaction history, a range of types of transactions, or a range of values of transactions.
  • 5. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: trigger, based at least in part on the item of account information, at least one of: a notification, a programmatic event, a callback event.
  • 6. The computer system of claim 5, wherein the item of account information includes at least one of: a transaction amount, an available funds amount, a frequency of transactions, or an entity involved in a transaction.
  • 7. The computer system of claim 6, wherein trigger is initiated in response to the item of account information satisfying a condition or threshold.
  • 8. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: authenticate the simulated instance of the software application with the second computing device based on at least one of: an identifier code, an authentication token, or a Media Access Control (MAC) address.
  • 9. The computer system of claim 8, wherein the simulated instance of the software application is configured to appear, from the perspective of the second computing device, to be the software application executing on a physical computing device of the user.
  • 10. The computer system of claim 8, wherein: the authentication credentials associated with the user include at least a username associated with the user, and a password associated with the user; andrequesting the at least one of the account data, the transaction data, or the electronic document further includes providing, to the second computing device, the username associated with the user and the password associated with the user.
  • 11. The computer system of claim 1, wherein analyzing the electronic document comprises at least one of: electronically scraping data from the electronic document including the item of account information,executing an extraction script on the electronic document, orperforming an optical character recognition process on the electronic document.
  • 12. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to, at least one of: initiate, by the simulated instance of the software application and via the API, a transaction to or from an account indicated by the item of account information; orinitiate, via the API or another API, a transaction to or from an account indicated by the item of account information.
  • 13. The computer system of claim 12, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: determine, via the API or the another API, a status of the transaction; andprovide, to another computing device, the status of the transaction.
  • 14. The computer system of claim 13, wherein providing the status of the transaction comprises causing electronically initiating communication via at least one of: email, text message, platform message, phone call, HTTP message, or programmatic event.
  • 15. The computer system of claim 14, wherein providing the status of the transaction comprises providing a notification indicating at least one of: a transaction value exceeding a threshold, or a transaction value being less than a threshold.
  • 16. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: receive a request to initiate a transaction using the account information;determine a parameter value of an account indicated by the account information;determine whether the parameter value satisfies a condition of the request; andin response to the parameter value not satisfying the condition, provide a notification.
  • 17. The computer system of claim 16, wherein the parameter value indicates at least one of: a transaction availability of the account, an age of the account, a range of transactions of the account, or a likelihood of fraud associated with the account.
  • 18. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: receive a request to execute a transaction, wherein the transaction indicates an other account; andin response to receiving the request: initiate, by the simulated instance of the software application and via the API, a first transaction from an account indicated by the account information to a first proxy account; andinitiate, via the API or another API, a second transaction from a second proxy account to the other account.
  • 19. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: receive a request to execute a transaction, wherein the transaction indicates an other account; andin response to receiving the request: initiate, by the simulated instance of the software application and via the API, a first transaction to an account indicated by the account information from a first proxy account; andinitiate, via the API or another API, a second transaction to a second proxy account from the other account.
  • 20. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more hardware computer processors are configured to execute the plurality of computer executable instructions in order to further cause the computer system to: provide, to another computing device, the item of account information.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/455,959, filed 10 Mar. 2017, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/790,897, filed 2 Jul. 2015, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/719,117, filed 21 May 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/001,461, filed on 21 May 2014, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (237)
Number Name Date Kind
5237499 Garback Aug 1993 A
5347632 Filepp Sep 1994 A
5634127 Cloud May 1997 A
5649186 Ferguson Jul 1997 A
5701451 Rogers Dec 1997 A
5710884 Dedrick Jan 1998 A
5710918 Lagarde Jan 1998 A
5721908 Lagarde Feb 1998 A
5727159 Kikinis Mar 1998 A
5745754 Lagarde Apr 1998 A
5752246 Rogers May 1998 A
5778065 Hauser et al. Jul 1998 A
5778367 Wesinger, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5787403 Randle Jul 1998 A
5793964 Rogers Aug 1998 A
5813007 Nielsen Sep 1998 A
5815665 Teper Sep 1998 A
5819284 Farber Oct 1998 A
5835724 Smith Nov 1998 A
5838910 Domenikos et al. Nov 1998 A
5838916 Domenikos et al. Nov 1998 A
5845073 Carlin Dec 1998 A
5855018 Chor et al. Dec 1998 A
5862325 Reed et al. Jan 1999 A
5870559 Leshem et al. Feb 1999 A
5875296 Shi Feb 1999 A
5878219 Vance Mar 1999 A
5892905 Brandt et al. Apr 1999 A
5892909 Grasso Apr 1999 A
5898836 Freivald Apr 1999 A
5901287 Bull May 1999 A
5903881 Schrader May 1999 A
5908469 Botz Jun 1999 A
5913214 Madnick Jun 1999 A
5918216 Miksovsky et al. Jun 1999 A
5920848 Schutzer Jul 1999 A
5926798 Carter Jul 1999 A
5930764 Melchione et al. Jul 1999 A
5930777 Barber Jul 1999 A
5933604 Inakoshi Aug 1999 A
5933816 Zeanah Aug 1999 A
5956720 Fernandez et al. Sep 1999 A
5961593 Gabber et al. Oct 1999 A
5961601 Iyengar Oct 1999 A
5963915 Kirsch Oct 1999 A
5963925 Kolling Oct 1999 A
5966967 Agrawal Oct 1999 A
5978828 Greer Nov 1999 A
5978842 Noble Nov 1999 A
5983267 Shklar et al. Nov 1999 A
5983268 Freivald Nov 1999 A
5987440 O'Neil Nov 1999 A
5987454 Hobbs Nov 1999 A
5995943 Bull Nov 1999 A
5999971 Buckland Dec 1999 A
6003032 Bunney et al. Dec 1999 A
6006333 Nielsen Dec 1999 A
6023698 Lavey Feb 2000 A
6041362 Mears et al. Mar 2000 A
6047327 Tso et al. Apr 2000 A
6055570 Nielsen Apr 2000 A
6078929 Rao Jun 2000 A
6082776 Feinberg Jul 2000 A
6092196 Reiche Jul 2000 A
6092197 Coueignoux Jul 2000 A
6105131 Carroll Aug 2000 A
6119101 Peckover Sep 2000 A
6138158 Boyle Oct 2000 A
6148337 Estberg et al. Nov 2000 A
6151581 Kraftson et al. Nov 2000 A
6151601 Papierniak Nov 2000 A
6182142 Win Jan 2001 B1
6185567 Ratnaraj et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195698 Lillibridge et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199077 Inala Mar 2001 B1
6205433 Boesch Mar 2001 B1
6208975 Bull Mar 2001 B1
6209007 Kelley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6243816 Fang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246999 Riley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6278449 Sugiarto et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278999 Knapp Aug 2001 B1
6292789 Schutzer Sep 2001 B1
6297819 Furst Oct 2001 B1
6301584 Ranger Oct 2001 B1
6308203 Itabashi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311275 Jin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317783 Freishtat Nov 2001 B1
6360205 Iyengar Mar 2002 B1
6366933 Ball et al. Apr 2002 B1
6401118 Thomas Jun 2002 B1
6405245 Burson Jun 2002 B1
6412073 Rangan Jun 2002 B1
6424968 Broster Jul 2002 B1
6430539 Lazarus Aug 2002 B1
6484155 Kiss Nov 2002 B1
6499042 Markus Dec 2002 B1
6510451 Wu Jan 2003 B2
6567411 Dahlen May 2003 B2
6567850 Freishtat May 2003 B1
6594766 Rangan Jul 2003 B2
6632248 Isaac et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633910 Rajan Oct 2003 B1
6631402 Devine Nov 2003 B1
6725200 Rost Apr 2004 B1
6802042 Rangan Oct 2004 B2
6859931 Cheyer et al. Feb 2005 B1
6957199 Fisher Oct 2005 B1
7028049 Shelton Apr 2006 B1
7072932 Stahl Jul 2006 B1
7092913 Cannon, Jr. Aug 2006 B2
7200578 Paltenghe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7263548 Daswani Aug 2007 B2
7275046 Tritt et al. Sep 2007 B1
7340411 Cook Mar 2008 B2
7424520 Daswani Sep 2008 B2
7752535 Satyavolu Jul 2010 B2
8006291 Headley et al. Aug 2011 B2
8010783 Cahill Aug 2011 B1
8145914 Steeves Mar 2012 B2
8166562 Holvey et al. Apr 2012 B2
8266515 Satyavolu Sep 2012 B2
8613066 Brezinski et al. Dec 2013 B1
8645264 Allison et al. Feb 2014 B2
8676611 McLaughlin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8739260 Damm-Goossens May 2014 B1
8995967 Billman Mar 2015 B1
9106642 Bhimanail Aug 2015 B1
9430892 Amdahl Aug 2016 B2
9449346 Hockey Sep 2016 B1
9595023 Hockey et al. Mar 2017 B1
9699187 Chen et al. Jul 2017 B2
9774590 Bronshtein et al. Sep 2017 B1
9906520 Fouad et al. Feb 2018 B2
10003591 Hockey et al. Jun 2018 B2
10104059 Hockey et al. Oct 2018 B2
10319029 Hockey et al. Jun 2019 B1
10523653 Hockey et al. Dec 2019 B2
10530761 Hockey et al. Jan 2020 B2
10614463 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 B1
10726491 Hockey et al. Jul 2020 B1
10878421 Putnam Dec 2020 B2
10904239 Hockey et al. Jan 2021 B2
10984468 Hockey et al. Apr 2021 B1
11030682 Hockey et al. Jun 2021 B1
11050729 Hockey et al. Jun 2021 B2
20010011274 Klug et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020002596 Sugiarto et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020065772 Saliba et al. May 2002 A1
20020091635 Dilip et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095588 Shigematsu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030023879 Wray Jan 2003 A1
20030028646 Wray Feb 2003 A1
20030060896 Hulai Mar 2003 A9
20030163425 Cannon, Jr. Aug 2003 A1
20030182035 DiLodovico et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185370 Rosera et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204460 Robinson Oct 2003 A1
20050027617 Zucker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050154913 Barriga et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050222929 Steier et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246269 Smith Nov 2005 A1
20060015358 Chua Jan 2006 A1
20060116949 Wehunt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060190569 Neil Aug 2006 A1
20060236384 Lindholm et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070179942 Heggem Aug 2007 A1
20070225047 Bakos Sep 2007 A1
20070255662 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070289002 van der Horst et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080051059 Fisher Feb 2008 A1
20080052192 Fisher Feb 2008 A1
20080052233 Fisher Feb 2008 A1
20080162361 Sklovsky Jul 2008 A1
20080183628 Oliver et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080243784 Stading Oct 2008 A1
20080250246 Arditti et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090037308 Feinstein Feb 2009 A1
20090070257 Csoka Mar 2009 A1
20090222900 Benaloh et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228779 Williamson et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245521 Vembu Oct 2009 A1
20090271847 Karjala et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090328177 Frey et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100027552 Hill Feb 2010 A1
20100049850 Nanduri et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100169072 Zaki et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185868 Grecia Jul 2010 A1
20100235882 Moore Sep 2010 A1
20100313255 Khuda Dec 2010 A1
20110196790 Milne Aug 2011 A1
20110238550 Reich et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110247060 Whitmyer, Jr. Oct 2011 A1
20110295731 Waldron, III et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120129503 Lindeman et al. May 2012 A1
20120209775 Milne Aug 2012 A1
20120278201 Milne Nov 2012 A1
20120281058 Laney et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130019297 Lawson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130097685 Kennedy et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130125223 Sorotokin et al. May 2013 A1
20130174015 Jeff Jul 2013 A1
20130247005 Hirsch et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130282577 Milne Oct 2013 A1
20130318592 Grier, Sr. et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140032414 Beisner et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140040148 Ozvat et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140044123 Lawson et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140150072 Castro et al. May 2014 A1
20140165156 Fushman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180962 Fiala et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140189808 Mahaffey et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140215551 Allain et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140236716 Shapiro et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140245411 Meng et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140258063 Chourasia et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140365350 Shvarts Dec 2014 A1
20150026024 Caiman et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150046338 Laxminarayanan et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066719 Agrawal et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088707 Drury et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150113511 Poulin Apr 2015 A1
20150161608 Gilbert Jun 2015 A1
20150254672 Huesch et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150281225 Schoen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310562 Chourasia et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150365399 Biswas et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160063657 Chen et al. Mar 2016 A1
20170200234 Morse Jul 2017 A1
20180267847 Keremane et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180367428 Di Pietro et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190333159 Chourasia et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200106764 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200106765 Hockey et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200110585 Perry Apr 2020 A1
20200201878 Putnam et al. Jun 2020 A1
20210217016 Putman Jul 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0 848 336 Jun 1998 EP
0 848 338 Jun 1998 EP
0 848 339 Jun 1998 EP
2 747 374 Jun 2014 EP
3 347 846 Jul 2018 EP
WO 9638795 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9710542 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9709682 May 1997 WO
WO 9726612 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9737314 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9814896 Apr 1998 WO
WO 0025227 May 2000 WO
WO 2017044479 Mar 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (97)
Entry
U.S. Pat. No. 9,449,346, System and Method for Programmatically Accessing Financial Data, Sep. 20, 2016.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,319,029, System and Method for Programmatically Accessing Financial Data, Jun. 11, 2019.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,595,023, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, Mar. 14, 2017.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,614,463, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, Apr. 7, 2020.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,003,591, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Jun. 19, 2018.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,523,653, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Dec. 31, 2019.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,104,059, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Oct. 16, 2018.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,530,761, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Jan. 7, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,110, System and Method for Programmatically Accessing Financial Data, filed May 21, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/396,505, System and Method for Programmatically Accessing Financial Data, filed Apr. 26, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,117, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, filed May 21, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/688,192, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed Nov. 19, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/688,263 Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed Nov. 19, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/159,714, Parameter-Based Computer Evaluation of User Accounts Based on User Account Data Stored in One or More Databases, filed May 19, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/160,663, Systems and Methods for Estimating Past and Prospective Attribute Values Associated With a User Account, filed May 20, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/570,630, Secure Authorization of Access to User Accounts by One or More Authorization Mechanisms, filed Sep. 13, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/042,147, Browser-Based Aggregation, filed Jul. 23, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/042,618, Data Verified Deposits, filed Jul. 23, 2018.
Examination Report in CA Application No. 2997115, dated Apr. 2, 2020.
Mancini et al., “Simulation in the Cloud Using Handheld Devices,” Workshop on Modeling and Simulation on Grid and Cloud Computing, Apr. 25, 2012, 8 pages.
Quwaider et al., “Experimental Framework for Mobile Cloud Computing System”, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Procedia Computer Science 52, 2015, pp. 1147-1152.
Sunwoo et al., “A Structured Approach to the Simulation, Analysis and Characterization of Smartphone Applications”, IEEE 2013, pp. 113-122.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/455,959, System and Method for Facilitating Programmatic Verification of Transactions, filed Mar. 10, 2017.
“A Single Login Web Service Integrator—WebEntrance”, Yan Zhao, Sixth International World Wide Web Conference, Santa Clara, CA, Apr. 7-11, 1997.
“Automatic Notification of Web Sites Changes,” Google Groups, Aug. 30, 1995.
“Boeing Chooses NetMind Enterprise Minder to Help Thousands of Employees Track Web-Based Information,” PR Newswire, Nov. 19, 1998.
“Caravelle's InfoWatcher 1.1 Keeps an Eye on the Web,” PC Week 1997.
“Cognisoft Announces IntelliServ, A Revolutionary Intranet Information Management Application; a Powerful Solution that Enables the Right Information to Find the Right User at the Right Time,” Business Wire, p. 8140125, Aug. 14, 1996.
“FirstFloor and AirMedia Announce Partnership,” Business Wire 1997 (“FirstFloor”).
“Fujitsu Announces ‘WebAgent’ Application as part of ByeDesk Link Wireless Server Software,” Business Wire, Sep. 1, 1998.
“Fujitsu Announces Availability of ByeDesk Link for Alpha-Numeric Pagers; Next Step in Empowering Mobile Workforces with ‘Anyplace, Anytime’ Information,” Business Wire, Jul. 9, 1998.
“Fujitsu Picks NetMind for Wireless Web Agent Software,” Computergram International, Sep. 2, 1998.
“Fujitsu's ByeDesk Link Now Available On the PalmPilot,” Business Wire, Sep. 21, 1998.
“GC Tech's GlobelD Payment Internet Commerce Software Supports Microsoft, Merchant Server,” Business Wire, Jan. 21, 1997, p. 1211286.
“Highly Scalable On-Line Payments via Task Decoupling,” Financial Cryptography First International Conference, 1998, p. 355-373.
“Minding Web Site Changes,” PC Week, Sep. 14, 1998.
“NetMind Accepts $7 Million Strategic Investment From Three Prominent VC Firms—BancBoston, SOFTBANK and Draper Fisher Jurvestson,” PR Newswire, Nov. 6, 1998.
“NetMind Updates the World's Largest Free Web Tracking Service,” PR Newswire, Sep. 18, 1998.
“The AT&T Internet Difference Engine: Tracking and Viewing Changes on the Web,” World Wide Web 1 (1); Jan. 1998, pp. 27-44.
“Versatile Intelligent Agents in Commercial Applications,” Google Groups, Dec. 12, 1998.
“Web Interface Definition Language (WIDL)”, W3 Consortium submission from webMethods, Inc., Sep. 22, 1997.
“WebEntree: A Web Service Aggregator”, Y. Zhao, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 37, No. 4, 1998.
A hierarchical approach to wrapper induction, Ion Muslea, Steve Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents 1999, Seattle, WA, 1999. May 1-5, 1999.
Building agents for internet-base supply chain integration, Craig A. Knoblock and Steven Minton. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents for Electronic Commerce and Managing the Internet-Enabled Supply Chain, Seattle, WA, 1999. May 1-5, 1999.
Corena et al., “Secure and fast aggregation of financial data in cloud-based expense tracking applications.” Journal of Network and Systems Management 20.4 (2012): 534-560.
Examination Report in CA Application No. 2997115, dated Jun. 20, 2019.
Examination Report in CA Application No. 2997115, dated Nov. 13, 2019.
Hagel et al. “The Coming Battle for Customer Information.” Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1997, reprint No. 97104.
Hummer, Waldemar, Philipp Leitner, and Schahram Dustdar. “Ws-aggregation: distributed of web services data.” Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 2011.
Intelligent caching for information mediators: A kr based approach, Naveen Ashish, Craig A. Knoblock, and Cyrus Shahabi. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases (KRDB), Seattle, WA, 1998. Presented May 1, 1998.
International Search Report in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/050536, dated Dec. 15, 2016.
Johner et al. “Sign On with IBM's Global Sign-On!” IBM manual, Nov. 1998. Part 1, in 184 pages.
Johner et al. “Sign On with IBM's Global Sign-On!” IBM manual, Nov. 1998. Part 2, pp. 166-307.
Kim, Young-Gon et al., ‘A Design of User Authentication System Using QR code Identifying Method’, 6th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), pp. 31-35, 2011.
Kyeongwon C., et al., ‘A Mobile based Anti-Phishing Authentication Scheme using QR code’, IEEE International Conference on Mobile IT Convergence, pp. 109-113, 2011.
Modeling web sources for information integration, Craig A. Knoblock, Steven Minton, Jose Luis Ambite, Naveen Ashish, Pragnesh Jay Modi, Ion Muslea, Andrew G. Philpot, and Sheila Tejada. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, Wl, 1998. Jul. 26-30, 1998.
Mohammed et al. A Multi-layer of Multi Factors Authentication Model for Online Banking Services, Oct. 15, 2013, 2013 International Conference on Computing, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICCEEE), pp. 220-224.
Neville, S.W. et al. Efficiently Archieving Full Three-Way Non-repudiation in Consumer-level eCommerce and M-Commerce Transactions, Nov. 1, 2011, 2011 IEEE 10th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, pp. 664-672.
Optimizing Information Agents by Selectively Materializing Data, Naveen Ashish, Craig A. Knoblock, and Cyrus Shahabi. In Proceedings of the AAAI'98 Workshop on AI and Information Integration, Madison, WI, 1998. Jul. 26-30, 1998.
O'Riain et al., “XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13.2 (2012): 141-162.
Part 1 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 2 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 3 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 4 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 5 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 6 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 7 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 8 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 9 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 10 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Part 11 of various documents related to MaxMiles and/or MileageManager, as obtained from Yodlee Inc. v. Plaid Technologies Inc., Civil Action No. 14-cv-01445-LPS and/or Yodlee Inc. v. Cashedge Inc., Civil Action No. 05-cv-01550-SI. To the best of Applicant's knowledge, MaxMiles and/or MileageManager were products and/or services offered around 1997 or earlier.
Semi-automatic wrapper generation for Internet information sources, Naveen Ashish and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Second IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Kiawah Island, SC, 1997. Jun. 24-27, 1997.
Supplementary European Search Report in EP Application No. 16844973.4, dated Jan. 4, 2019.
The ariadne approach to web-based information integration, Craig A. Knoblock and Steven Minton. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(5), Sep./Oct. 1998.
WebVCR product bulletin and documentation, NetResults Corporation, 1996. We understand that, with respect to issues raised by this litigation, the WebVCR product as available in 1996 provided substantially the same functionality as is described at http://www.n2r6.com/fs_webvcr_info.html.
WebVCR web service, which is described by at least the following references: The WebVCR product bulletin and documentation, NetResults Corporation, 1996 and http://www.n2r6.com/fs_webvcr_info.html.
Wrapper generation for semi-structured Internet sources, Naveen Ashish and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Management of Semistructured Data, Tucson, AZ, 1997. May 13-15, 1997.
Wrapper induction for semistructured, web-based information sources, Ion Muslea, Steven Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. In Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Learning and Discovery Workshop on Learning from Text and the Web, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998. Jun. 11-13, 1998.
U.S. Pat. No. 11,030,682, System and Method for Programmatically Accessing Financial Data, Jun. 8, 2021.
U.S. Pat. No. 11,050,729, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Jun. 29, 2021.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,904,239, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, Jan. 26, 2021.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,726,491, Parameter-Based Computer Evaluation of User Accounts Based on User Account Data Stored in One or More Databases, Jul. 28, 2020.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,984,468, Systems and Methods for Estimating Past and Prospective Attribute Values Associated With a User Account, Apr. 20, 2021.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,878,421, Data Verified Deposits, Dec. 29, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/303,432, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed May 28, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/126,673, Secure Permissioning of Access to User Accounts, Including Secure Deauthorization of Access to User Accounts, filed Dec. 18, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/900,052, Parameter-Based Computer Evaluation of User Accounts Based on User Account Data Stored in One or More Databases, filed Jun. 12, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/230,835, Systems and Methods for Estimating Past and Prospective Attribute Values Associated With a User Account, filed Apr. 14, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/103,267, Data Verified Deposits, filed Nov. 24, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/302,499, Secure Updating of Allocations to User Accounts, filed May 4, 2021.
Chaulagain et al., “Cloud Based Web Scraping for Big Data Application.” IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud, 2017, pp. 138-143.
M. C. McChesney, “Banking in cyberspace: an investment in itself,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 54-59.
Y. Zhao, “WebEntree: A Web Service Aggregator”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 37, No. 4, 1998, pp. 584-595.
Examination Report in CA Application No. 2997115 dated Nov. 2, 2020, 3 pages.
Examination Report in EP Application No. 16844973.4 dated Nov. 4, 2020, 6 pages.
Examination Report in AU Application No. 2016321166 dated Dec. 7, 2020, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/030808, dated Jun. 21, 2021, 11 pages.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62001461 May 2014 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15455959 Mar 2017 US
Child 16800543 US
Parent 14790897 Jul 2015 US
Child 15455959 US
Parent 14719117 May 2015 US
Child 14790897 US