System and method for flexible handling of rules and regulations in labor hiring

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7596566
  • Patent Number
    7,596,566
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 24, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 29, 2009
    14 years ago
Abstract
A method and system are described for flexible handling of rules and regulations in labor hiring, comprising of receiving a requisition form from a computing device, at least partially completed by a requestor; automatically performing a rules check on the requisition form; in response to a field entry on the form violating a predefined rule, returning the requisition form to the requester to correct or providing the requisition form to a supervisor to override a field entry violating a predefined rule; and in response to no field entry on the form violating a predefined rule, transmitting the form to a service provider.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to procurement of services, and more particularly to coordinating the group procurement of services.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

When someone in an enterprise or other similar organization needs to hire temporary labor, particularly under great time pressure, often a suitable candidate cannot be found in time. Suitability, in such cases, may be defined in terms of qualifications to perform the work, or agreeing to meet corporate guidelines about the hourly rate or the hours of work, or in meeting any of a multitude of corporate hiring guidelines. These guidelines are usually embedded in the systems, where available, making the systems complex to use. An example of the complexity is that the approval of the hiring request becomes a multi-step process with iterative changes to requirements and takes a long time. Often, due to complexity of usage and increased cycle time of the systems, hiring personnel in an organization end up circumventing the system to be able to hire a person they desperately need to continue running their business or completing a project. Current hiring systems in these organizations thus may actually undermine corporate policies and create an atmosphere in which hiring personnel feel it necessary and right to work around rules.


What is clearly needed is a system and method that allows hiring personnel, in certain situations, particularly in the hiring of temporary labor, to automatically apply corporate hiring guidelines, notify the user when he is violating policies, and then allow him to flexibly override certain labor procurement procedures and corporate labor rules and policies.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention includes a method and system for flexible handling of rules and regulations in labor hiring, comprising of receiving a requisition form from a computing device, at least partially completed by a requestor; automatically performing a rules check on the requisition form; in response to a field entry on the form violating a predefined rule, returning the requisition form to the requestor to correct or providing the requisition form to a supervisor to override a field entry violating a predefined rule; and in response to no field entry on the form violating a predefined rule, transmitting the form to a service provider.


The present invention describes systems, clients, servers, methods, and computer-readable media of varying scope. In addition to the aspects and advantages of the present invention described in this summary, further aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by reading the detailed description that follows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a partial overview of a flexible labor procurement system 100 according to one embodiment;



FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the procedure for completing and processing a hiring requisition in accordance with one embodiment;



FIG. 3 shows a diagram of the procedure for completing and processing a hiring requisition in accordance with an alternative embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical, functional, and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.



FIG. 1 shows a partial overview of a flexible labor procurement system 100 according to one embodiment. Server 110 is a computer or server in the network. It is clear that in many cases more than one such server 110 may exist, but for purposes of simplicity and clarity in FIG. 1, only one such server 110 is shown. This server also may be used for other systems. For example, it may be integrated with a services procurement system as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/093,353, filed Mar. 29, 2005 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,635, filed Mar. 31, 2005, both of which are entitled Method and System for Anonymous Resale of Inventory and Profit-Making from Sale of Unused Inventory, and both of which are incorporated herein by reference. However, in other cases server 110 could be dedicated only to the single function of the novel art of this disclosure, or in yet other cases, it could be integrated with some other types of systems, either as a separate module or as a fully integrated feature.


Database 101 contains the human resources data of the system, including, but not limited to, both the rules for hourly rates, benefits, permissions, etc., as well as corporate policies regarding the qualifications of workers and other applicable aspects of hiring labor. A person requiring temporary labor would fill out an electronic hiring requisition form available at computer workstation 102. This form would then be processed through a rule and constraint checker 103. Checker 103 may have its own rules and constraints database 104, or it may rely on the human resources databases 101, or on both databases. Then after the processing is finished, the request may be sent to some or many temporary service providers 105a-n. In other cases, the request may be sent to a services exchange system as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/093,353, filed Mar. 29, 2005 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,635, filed Mar. 31, 2005, both of which are entitled Method and System for Anonymous Resale of Inventory and Profit-Making from Sale of Unused Inventory, and both of which are incorporated herein by reference.



FIG. 2 shows a simplified diagram of the procedure for completing and processing a hiring requisition. The person requesting the temporary labor opens standard requisition form 200 at a computer workstation, as described above in the discussion of FIG. 1, and fills in standard fields in step 201. If the requestor enters any field values that are non-compliant with requisition rules or with the corporate rules, said values may still be accepted by the form, but may be marked to highlight and/or distinguish them, for example, in a special color. Once the rules check is completed in step 202 (using rules and constraints engine 103), final review is done in step 203. If certain rules are violated, the requisition is rejected and sent back in step 204 to the requestor or to his supervisor, either for amendment and/or to override instructions. If, in step 203, the rules are met and the form is approved, the completed form 200 is then passed on in step 205 for transmission to service providers. If a re-application or an override has occurred, then in step 203 the override causes the application to immediately continue to transmission to a service provider in step 205.



FIG. 3 shows an alternative embodiment, in which, after the requestor opens standard from 200 and fills in the fields in step 201, a rules check is made of the requisition rules in step 301. If noncompliance with the rules is discovered, in step 204 the system may send a request for an override message to the requester or in some cases to his supervisor. Once this hurdle is cleared with an override or a modification, the requisition receives an approval in step 302, and then in step 303 it undergoes a second separate check for corporate policies, etc. Once the requisition receives an approval in step 203, it goes to step 205. Alternatively, the requisition may be rejected. It then goes back via step 204 for amendment by the requestor or an override by a supervisor, in this case probably a different supervisor, because the same person usually does not have authorization to override both the requisition rules and the corporate or human resources policies.


The processes described above can be stored in a memory of a computer system as a set of instructions to be executed. In addition, the instructions to perform the processes described above could alternatively be stored on other forms of machine-readable media, including magnetic and optical disks. For example, the processes described could be stored on machine-readable media, such as magnetic disks or optical disks, which are accessible via a disk drive (or computer-readable medium drive). Further, the instructions can be downloaded into a computing device over a data network in a form of compiled and linked version.


Alternatively, the logic to perform the processes as discussed above could be implemented in additional computer and/or machine readable media, such as discrete hardware components as large-scale integrated circuits (LSI's), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC's), firmware such as electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM's); and electrical, optical, acoustical and other forms of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.); etc.


Whereas many alterations and modifications of the present invention will no doubt become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art after having read the foregoing description, it is to be understood that any particular embodiment shown and described by way of illustration is in no way intended to be considered limiting. Therefore, references to details of various embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claims which in themselves recite only those features regarded as essential to the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving a labor requisition form from a computing device, at least partially completed by a requester requesting at least temporary labor support be provided to the requestor;automatically performing a rules check on the labor requisition form using at least one rule of requisition rules and corporate rules associated with an employer of the requestor;in response to the labor requisition form violating any of the at least one rule, returning the labor requisition form to the requester to notify the requester of one or more violations of the at least one rule and sending a request for an override message to the requester; andin response to the override message from the requestor, automatically accepting the labor requisition form having the one or more violations and transmitting the labor requisition form to a temporary labor service provider for the temporary labor support requested by the requestor.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the labor requisition form comprises field entries, the method further comprising accepting, displaying and highlighting field entries that violate at least one rule.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the automatically performing the rules check is performed by a rules and constraint engine.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the highlighting includes coloring the respective violating field entry in a color distinguished from a field entry that is not violating any of the at least one rule.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising after the accepting of the labor requisition form that violates the at least one rule, automatically performing a second check on the labor requisition form, using a computer, in view of corporate policies.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising: in response to a field entry on the labor requisition form violating a corporate policy, providing the labor requisition form to a supervisor of the requestor for an override to accept the field entry violating a corporate policy.
  • 7. A machine readable medium having stored thereon a set of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising: receiving a labor requisition form from a computing device, at least partially completed by a requester requesting at least temporary labor support be provided to the requestor;automatically performing a rules check on the labor requisition form using at least one rule of requisition rules and corporate rules associated with an employer of the requestor;in response to the labor requisition form violating any of the at least one rule, returning the labor requisition form to the requester to notify the requestor of one or more violations of the at least one rule and sending a request for an override message to the requester; andin response to the override message from the requester, automatically accepting the labor requisition form and transmitting the labor requisition form to a temporary labor service provider for the temporary labor support requested by the requestor.
  • 8. The machine readable medium of claim 7, wherein the method further comprises: accepting, displaying and highlighting field entries entered on the labor requisition form that violate the at least one rule, as a respective entry is entered on the labor requisition form.
  • 9. A system comprising: a processor; anda memory coupled to the processor the memory storing instructions to cause the processor to: receive a labor requisition form from a computing device, at least partially completed by a requestor requesting at least temporary labor support be provided to the requester;automatically perform a rules check on the labor requisition form using at least one rule of requisition rules and corporate rules associated with an employer of the requestor;return the labor requisition form to the requester to notify the requester of one or more violations of the at least one rule and send a request for an override message to the requester, in response to the labor requisition form violating any of the at least one rule; andautomatically accept the labor requisition form and transmit the labor requisition form to a temporary labor service provider, in response to the override message from the requestor.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is to automatically perform a second check on the requisition form in view of corporate policies.
US Referenced Citations (105)
Number Name Date Kind
5191523 Whitesage Mar 1993 A
5319542 King et al. Jun 1994 A
5331546 Webber et al. Jul 1994 A
5475740 Biggs et al. Dec 1995 A
5570283 Shoolery et al. Oct 1996 A
5655008 Futch et al. Aug 1997 A
5819092 Ferguson et al. Oct 1998 A
5832451 Flake et al. Nov 1998 A
5839114 Lynch et al. Nov 1998 A
5852812 Reeder Dec 1998 A
5893077 Griffin Apr 1999 A
5897620 Walker et al. Apr 1999 A
6018715 Lynch et al. Jan 2000 A
6023679 Acebo et al. Feb 2000 A
6195420 Tognazzini Feb 2001 B1
6230204 Fleming May 2001 B1
6295521 DeMarcken et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304850 Keller et al. Oct 2001 B1
6411940 Egendorf Jun 2002 B1
6442526 Vance et al. Aug 2002 B1
6477520 Malaviya et al. Nov 2002 B1
6571213 Altendahl et al. May 2003 B1
6622084 Cardno et al. Sep 2003 B2
6715073 An et al. Mar 2004 B1
6816882 Conner et al. Nov 2004 B1
6839679 Lynch et al. Jan 2005 B1
6847988 Toyouchi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6959298 Silverbrook et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961773 Hartman et al. Nov 2005 B2
6965868 Bednarek Nov 2005 B1
6980885 Ye et al. Dec 2005 B2
7080096 Imamura Jul 2006 B1
7117170 Bennett et al. Oct 2006 B1
7136821 Kohavi et al. Nov 2006 B1
7139728 Rigole Nov 2006 B2
7222084 Archibald et al. May 2007 B2
7272568 Birch et al. Sep 2007 B1
7272626 Sahai et al. Sep 2007 B2
7315824 Chen et al. Jan 2008 B2
20020010612 Smith et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020016729 Breitenbach et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020103693 Bayer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120478 Tanaka Aug 2002 A1
20020156687 Carr et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030036930 Matos et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036981 Vaughan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040987 Hudson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030078800 Salle et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030105711 O'Neil Jun 2003 A1
20030110062 Mogler et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110136 Wells et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120477 Kruk et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120526 Altman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030182413 Allen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030200111 Damji Oct 2003 A1
20030204474 Capek et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030229529 Mui et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236722 Kamel Dec 2003 A1
20040044556 Brady et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044600 Chu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044644 Brady et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044673 Brady et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044681 Brady et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049413 Momma et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073615 Darling Apr 2004 A1
20040117275 Billera Jun 2004 A1
20040143498 Umeda Jul 2004 A1
20040153348 Garback Aug 2004 A1
20040167808 Fredericks et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040193457 Shogren Sep 2004 A1
20040210487 Fujimoto et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249684 Karppinen Dec 2004 A1
20040260601 Brief Dec 2004 A1
20040260603 Marmotta Dec 2004 A1
20050004830 Rozell et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043996 Silver Feb 2005 A1
20050060271 Vig Mar 2005 A1
20050065821 Kalies Mar 2005 A1
20050108069 Shiran et al. May 2005 A1
20050119809 Chen Jun 2005 A1
20050120052 Miller et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132006 Horvitz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138175 Kumar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165629 Bruns Jul 2005 A1
20050197915 Biwer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216375 Grendel et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050273345 Castillejo Dec 2005 A1
20050283389 Widjaja et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010023 Tromczynski et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060037016 Saha et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060100909 Glimp et al. May 2006 A1
20060101467 Buco et al. May 2006 A1
20060123088 Simmons et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143087 Tripp et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060190314 Hernandez Aug 2006 A1
20060212321 Vance et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224423 Sun et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060283935 Henry et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005406 Assadian et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070174154 Roberts et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070239548 Sears Oct 2007 A1
20080004964 Messa Jan 2008 A1
20080065408 Salonen Mar 2008 A1
20080091481 Messa Apr 2008 A1
20090006142 Orttung Jan 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2291463 Jun 2001 CA