This disclosure relates to the manufacturing of metal beverage containers.
Metal containers can be used to store beverages. Typical cans having a one-piece drawn and ironed body or a body open at both ends with a separate closure member at the top and bottom generally have simple upright cylindrical sidewalls. It can be desirable to form the sidewalls into different and/or more complex shapes for reasons related to aesthetics and/or product identification. For example, it can be desirable to shape a can so as to resemble a glass bottle.
A metal preform (“preform”) can be made from a metal sheet (e.g., aluminum sheet, aluminum-based alloys, steel, etc.) having, for example, a recrystallized or recovered microstructure and with a gauge in the range of about 0.004 inches to about 0.015 inches. Thinner and thicker gauges are also possible, such as between about 0.002 inches and about 0.020 inches. The preform can be a closed-end tube made by, for example, a draw-redraw process or by back-extrusion. The diameter of the preform can (but need not) lie somewhere between the minimum and maximum diameters of the desired container product. Threads can be formed on the preform prior to subsequent forming operations. The profile of the closed end of the preform can be designed to assist with the forming of the bottom profile of the final product.
Because vessels, such as those in the shape of a bottle, have certain axial strength criteria to prevent damage to the bottle during the life-cycle of the bottle, including filling, packaging, shipping, shelving, and consumer usage, materials used for the vessels are limited. Materials that are too soft are unsuitable due to the axial strength criteria. Additionally, material that is too thick, which would help to improve axial strength, is unsuitable due to weight and cost limitations for producing and shipping consumer products. Heating certain metals can degrade strength and structure of the final product, so metal selection and heating processes may be limited for producing metal vessels in the shape of glass bottles or otherwise, as well.
In performing blow molding, a method for manufacturing a metal beverage container may include arranging a metal preform, having metal sidewalls and a dome shaped metal bottom or closed end portion configured to withstand, for example, a pressure of at least 90 pounds per square inch without plastically deforming, adjacent to a heat source (i) such that heat from the heat source is transferred to the metal sidewalls to sufficiently soften the metal sidewalls to permit radial expansion of the metal sidewalls when subjected to fluid pressure of at least 30 bar and (ii) such that heat within the metal sidewalls sufficiently dissipates prior to conducting to the dome shaped metal bottom portion so as to prevent compromising the ability for the dome shaped metal bottom portion to withstand a pressure of at least 90 pounds per square inch without plastically deforming. The blow molding method may also include pressurizing the metal preform to radially expand the sidewalls by, for example, at least 15%.
One embodiment of a process of manufacturing a metal vessel may include providing a preform being formed of a work hardened metal. The preform may have an open portion, a closed end portion, and body portion. A multiple segment mold may be closed around the preform. The preform may be blow molded to cause a step-like change in pressure within the preform to cause the preform to take a shape defined by the mold. The molded preform may be removed from the mold.
One embodiment of a system for manufacturing a metal vessel may include a mold including multiple segments. The mold may be configured to receive the preform when in an open position. The preform may be formed of a work hardened metal, and have an open portion, a closed end portion, and a body portion. The system may further include a controller and a blowing device configured to be controlled by the controller. The controller may be configured to drive the blowing device so that the blowing device causes a step-like pressure change within the preform when the mold is in a closed position to cause the preform to take a shape defined by the mold.
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, which are incorporated by reference herein and wherein:
Pressure Molding Process
Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment, projecting or projection portions 208 of the cavity 206 project into/impinge on the preform 114 when the segments 204a and 204b close around the preform 114 to form the cavity 206. The projecting portions 208 partially deform/shape the preform 114. Recessed portions 210 of the cavity 206 do not project/impinge on the preform 114 when the segments 204a and 204b close around the preform 114 to form the cavity 206. Fluid forming techniques (e.g., hydro forming, etc.) can be used to expand/deform the preform 114 into the recessed portions 210 of the cavity 206.
Testing has revealed that if the pressure within the preform 114 is sufficiently low (e.g., less than 3 bar), shape defects in the preform 114 can result when the segments 204a and 204b close to form the cavity 206. This threshold pressure depends on the gauge of the preform 114, the diameter of the preform 114, the material comprising the preform 114, etc., and can be determined via testing, simulation, etc. That is, deformation, crushing, or wrinkling that is not consistent with the complement of the shape defined by the cavity 206 can occur as the projecting portions 208 impinge on the preform 114. To minimize or preclude these shape defects, the preform 114 can be pre-pressurized. It should be understood that the diameter of the preform 114 may be larger than then diameter of the mold 202 when in the closed position as a result of the material of the preform 114 having limited elasticity (e.g., work hardened aluminum, such as 3000 series aluminum) and having a thin gauge (e.g., between approximately 0.004 inches and approximately 0.020 inches) as the preform 114 has limited expansion capability as compared to other metals that are more elastic, such as superplastic metals and alloys. Alternative configurations of the preform 114 may be utilized where the diameter of the preform 114 is less than the diameter of the mold 202 in a closed position, which may allow for the mold to not contact the preform while closing. Metals that may be utilized in accordance with the principles of the present invention may include beverage can alloys and bulk aluminum, as understood in the art. The type of metal, mold configuration, molding technique, etc., determines whether the mold will contact the preform when closing. That is, if the metal of the preform is a relatively non-plastic metal, then the amount of stretch that is possible with the metal is limited, and, therefore, the mold is to be closer to the preform, including contacting the preform while closing so that the preform may contact all portions of the mold during the molding operation.
Referring to
Once a segmented mold has closed around the preform, the pressure within the preform can be increased via the introduction of fluid (e.g., water, oil, air) to a second pressure threshold (final pressurization threshold) to fluid form the preform into recessed portions of the cavity. This second pressure threshold is approximately 40 bar in the embodiment of
Testing has also revealed that the rate at which the pressure within the preform is increased from the first pressurization level to the final pressurization level can fatigue the preform in an undesirable manner. As apparent from
Referring to
As shown in
Referring again to
A pressure sensor 214 can be arranged within the preform 114 or within the valving and piping fluidly connecting the preform 114 and fluid source 212 to detect pressure within the preform 114. As a result of including the pressure sensor 214, an operator and/or controller 216 may monitor pressure being applied to the preform 114 prior to, during, and after performing a molding operation to the preform 114.
The mold 202, fluid source 212 (tanks, valving, piping, conduit(s), etc.), and pressure sensor 214 can be in communication with/under the control of one or more controllers 216 (collectively “controller”). The controller 216 may be configured to control the opening/closing of the mold 202 and the delivery of fluid to the preform 114 via a conduit 213. The conduit 213 may be a tube or other hollow member that allows for fluid to flow between the fluid source 212 and the cavity 206 of the mold 202. With the preform 114 suitably positioned on the segment 204c and between the open segments 204a and 204b, the controller 216 can cause the fluid source 212 to provide, for example, to create a pre-pressurization by supplying air, for example, to the preform 114 until an internal pressure of the preform 114 achieves a pre-pressurization, such as approximately 5 bar. In one embodiment, the controller 216 may control the fluid source 212 to create or otherwise release fluid to cause pressure to increase at the preform 114. Alternatively, the controller may cause one or more valves (not shown) attached to the conduit 213 to be adjusted (e.g., open, close, or partially open/close) to release fluid to cause pressure to increase at the preform 114. In causing the pressure to be increased at the preform 114, the controller 216 may be configured to communicate electrical signals to cause an electromechanical device, such as a valve, to be adjusted, as understood in the art.
Referring to
Referring to
The preform illustrated in
Blow Molding Process
Blow molding techniques can be used to form metal into, for example, the shape of a glass bottle. A blow molding apparatus can be loaded with a metal preform, e.g., a cylinder having an open end and a closed end. Fluid under pressure can then be delivered to the interior of the preform via the open end to expand the preform into a surrounding mold. The maximum radial expansion of the preform in such circumstances is in the range of 8% to 9% for 3000 series aluminum, for example. It has been found, however, that a work hardened preform with certain gauges as previously described has the ability to expand upwards of 20% at room temperature. Hence, if the diameter of the finished container is to be approximately 58 millimeters, the initial diameter of the preform should be no less than approximately 53 millimeters. In cases where the preform has a diameter less than that of the smallest diameter of the mold, then a pre-pressurization may not be needed as the preform is not deformed by the mold closing. For larger expansions, such as up to 40%, selective or localized preheating may be performed to further increase expansion of the preform, as further described herein. Such increased expansion may be used in the case where the mold has portions where the preform is to extend to create a final blow molded product.
A bottle shaped metal beverage container often has a top or finish portion formed near the open end of the container. To facilitate drinking from the container, the diameter of the top portion is usually less than the initial diameter of the associated preform. The diameter of the top portion, for example, can be approximately 28 millimeters. As many as 35 to 40 die necking (or similar) operations may need to be performed to reduce the initial diameter of the preform down to the desired top finish diameter. Performing this number of operations contributes to a considerable portion of the overall container manufacturing time and limits throughput. Moreover, several (costly) die necking machines are required to support this number of operations.
It has been discovered that selectively heating portions of a metal preform prior to blow molding can increase the maximum radial expansion of the preform to 15% to 25% or more, and possibly as much as 40% or more. Hence, if the maximum diameter of the finished container is to be approximately 58 millimeters, the initial diameter of the preform can be as small as approximately 45 millimeters or smaller. This reduction in initial preform diameter can reduce the number of die necking (or similar) operations required to achieve the desired top finish diameter by as much as 50%. Fewer such operations reduce overall container manufacturing time and the number (and cost) of die necking machines required to support these operations. Moreover, a wider array of container shapes including asymmetrical container shapes is possible given the increased capability to radially expand the preform.
Referring to
In performing the preheating of the preform 802, a controller 814 that may include one or more processors may be in communication with machinery or equipment 816. The machinery 816 may be standard equipment for use in processing and manufacturing metal cans and/or bottles, as understood in the art. However, the machinery 816 may be modified to perform the preheating, if preheating is used, to selectively preheat the preform 802 prior to the blowing process, and as further described hereinbelow with regard to step 904 of
The bottom strength of the closed end portion 806 is based on a combination of its final geometric design, metal thickness, and yield strength. Reductions in container bottom strength can result in undesirable bulging or deformation when subjected to pressure from a beverage stored therein. Such undesirable bulging or deformation is much less likely to occur at the body portion 808 due to the hoop strength associated with the geometry of the container walls.
It may be desirable to maintain the bottom portion's ability to withstand, for example, a pressure of at least 90 pounds per square inch without bulging or alternatively without plastically (permanently) deforming during the preform heating process. The distance between the closed end portion 806 and the heating device 810 that permits heat within the sidewalls of the body portion 808 to sufficiently dissipate prior to conducting to the dome shaped metal bottom portion 806 so as to prevent compromising its ability to withstand, for example, a pressure of at least 90 pounds per square inch without bulging or plastically deforming depends on such factors as (i) preform material and thickness, (ii) temperature of the heating device 810, (iii) target temperature for the body portion 808, and so on, and can be determined for any particular configuration via testing, simulation, etc. Additionally, cooling air (or other fluid) can be directed over the bottom portion 806 to facilitate heat dissipation.
Initial preform thickness and diameter as well as desired maximum radial expansion can influence the extent to which body portion 808 of the preform is heated. For example, a preform having an initial diameter of 45 millimeters and a 20% desired radial expansion may be blow molded at room temperature or need to be heated to a temperature, such as below 200 degrees Celsius, to allow complete expansion stretching of the preform metal during blow molding. A preform having an initial diameter of 38 millimeters and a 42% desired radial expansion may need to be heated to a higher temperature (e.g. at least 280 degrees Celsius) to allow complete expansion stretching of the preform metal during blow molding, etc. Additionally, times associated with transferring the preforms from the heating station to the blow molding station may further influence the heating strategy as the preforms may cool during this transfer. Decreases in preform temperature on the order of 100 degrees Celsius, for example, have been observed during a 6 second transfer time.
It should be understood that temperature ranges from approximately 100 degrees Celsius to approximately 250 degrees Celsius may be utilized depending on the material, gauge, heat time, and so forth. Desired temperatures for various portions of a given preform design as well as heating times, etc. can be determined via testing or simulation. Contrary to the pressure molding process described above that is not preheated or not preheated at temperatures of 200 degrees Celsius or higher, the preform may be coated after the blow molding process as provided in
Referring to
The process 900 may be performed using at least a partially automated process. In performing the process 900, controller 814 may be in communication with machinery 816 that causes the preform 802 to be heated by the heat 812 being generated by the heating device 810. For example, the controller 814, in communication with the machinery 814, may cause the preform 802 to pass near the heating device 810, cause the heating device 810 to pass near the preform 802, cause the heating device 810 to be applied to the preform 802, cause heat from the heating device 810 to be applied via a conduit that may be movable and/or valved (i.e., open valve applies heat, closed valve prevents heat from being applied) to the preform 802, or cause heat from the heating device 810 to be applied to the preform 802 in any other manner as understood in the art. The controller 814 may be in communication with the heating device 810 to cause the heating device 810 to generate heat. In one embodiment, the heating device 810 may be set to a specific temperature by the controller 814. Although represented that the heating device 810 is close in proximity to the metal preform 802, it should be understood that the heating device 810 may be positioned from the metal preform 802 and a conduit (not shown) extending from the heating device 810 to the preform 802, as suggested above, may be used to apply heat to the preform 802 while positioned at a station, such as at a molding station, or while being passed between stations by a conveyer, carrier, or other machinery, as understood in the art. In another embodiment, the mold itself may be configured to apply heat or have heat applied thereinto prior to and/or during the molding process.
It has further been discovered that certain initial preform geometries improve the yield of the heated blow molding process described above. That is, containers formed by way of heated blow forming from these preforms have fewer instances of wrinkles, tears or other defects.
Referring to
Experimentation and simulation has revealed that preforms conforming to at least some of the following relationships are generally well suited to the heated blow molding operations discussed above:
D≦2R+d (eq. 1)
d/D≧0.3 (eq. 2)
H/D≧3 (eq. 3)
For example, if D equals 45 millimeters and H equals 185 millimeters, then d can be 13.5 millimeters or larger, and R can be 15.75 millimeters or larger (or a compound radius can be used as desired).
While illustrative embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. The words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. As previously described, the features of various embodiments can be combined to form further embodiments of the invention that may not be explicitly described or illustrated. While various embodiments could have been described as providing advantages or being preferred over other embodiments or prior art implementations with respect to one or more desired characteristics, those of ordinary skill in the art recognize that one or more features or characteristics can be compromised to achieve desired overall system attributes, which depend on the specific application and implementation. These attributes can include, but are not limited to, cost, strength, durability, life cycle cost, marketability, appearance, packaging, size, serviceability, weight, manufacturability, ease of assembly, etc. As such, embodiments described as less desirable than other embodiments or prior art implementations with respect to one or more characteristics are not outside the scope of the disclosure and can be desirable for particular applications.
This Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,428, filed Dec. 31, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Applications 61/581,860 filed Dec. 30, 2011 entitled System and Method for Forming a Metal Beverage Container; 61/586,995 filed Jan. 16, 2012 entitled Metal Beverage Container Preform, and 61/586,990 filed Jan. 16, 2012 entitled Blow Forming of Heated Preform; the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3892829 | Uhlig | Jul 1975 | A |
3896648 | Schertenleib | Jul 1975 | A |
4304350 | Paez et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
5187962 | Bilko et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5746080 | Hartman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5970767 | Hartman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6067831 | Amborn et al. | May 2000 | A |
6272849 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6349583 | Kleinschmidt et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6577919 | Tomonaga et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6802196 | Gong et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834522 | Leppin et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7107804 | Gong et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7188499 | Ogaki et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191032 | MacEwen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7757527 | Kubacki et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8899085 | Adams et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020162371 | Hamstra et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030084694 | Gong et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20110113732 | Adams et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110167886 | Mallory et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004039511 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of PCT/US2012/072325 dated Apr. 22, 2013, pp. 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150074982 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61586990 | Jan 2012 | US | |
61586995 | Jan 2012 | US | |
61581860 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13731428 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14551941 | US |