The systems and methods described herein relate to healthcare product enrollment.
The present invention is directed to systems, methods and computer-readable media for use in connection with healthcare product enrollment. Data describing health profile information from a consumer is received. This data may be based on historical claims information or on responses to survey questions received from the consumer. The data may be for the individual alone, or for his dependents as well. Data describing cost of care information is determined based on the data describing the health profile information. At least one recommended health care coverage product for the consumer is determined based on the cost of care information. In some embodiments, a consumer cost associated with each of the recommended health care coverage product is conveyed to the consumer.
A focus of healthcare payors is to provide the best healthcare value to its members. Part of the value is generated in the product/benefit selection process in which members enroll into benefits that provide the best healthcare value. Enrollment is an annual process and creates an opportunity for members to evaluate their healthcare needs on an ongoing basis. Healthcare reform is empowering consumers with the option of comparing healthcare insurance options (private healthcare plans offered by employers, private healthcare plans purchased by individuals, or government sponsored healthcare plans) and enrolling in the right healthcare plan. This greater flexibility also leads to bigger responsibility and accountability for each individual in making informed, educated decisions.
The systems and methods described herein provide consumers with additional transparency in healthcare plan options. This transparency is derived from the processes, methodologies and outcomes as described. Consumers will be better informed about the overall cost of care and thereby make educated decisions in selecting the right healthcare plan based on their specific needs that will provide the consumers with the most value for their money spent.
The systems and methods described herein drive healthcare product sales and personalized enrollment based on cost of care information. Some embodiments of the invention include a set of workflow activities designed to enable a sales process driven by cost of care parameters for the consumer market. Other embodiments of the invention include an engine that recommends to a consumer a healthcare product in which to enroll based on, e.g., (1) historical claims driven forecasting, or (2) survey responses to quantify cost-of-care forecasting, and/or (3) auto-population of historical ‘Health Assessment’ data into the survey (i.e., health data that the payor may have for existing or former members), and (4) a pre-defined set of claim/cost aggregation categories.
With reference to
Preventive office visits such as immunizations, annual health check
Non-Preventive office visits with a general or family practice doctor
Non-Preventive office visit with a specialty doctor (e.g., cardiologist)
Generic drug prescriptions
Branded drug prescriptions
Specialty restricted drug prescriptions, such as for fertility, Cancer, AIDS
Emergency room visit at a hospital
Outpatient surgery at a hospital with no overnight stay
Hospitalization with overnight stay
General lab tests
Diagnostic imaging lab tests, such as MRI, CAT scan, Sonograms
The output 300 of this engine includes a cost share split structure that shows what amount the health plan will pay and what amount the consumer will pay per family member per the cost categories (examples of which are set forth above) if the particular product is bought.
In simulating the cost split, the engine makes the following assumptions, in an exemplary embodiment. It assumes all claims will be processed in-network. If the claims are processed out-of-network, then the consumer is expected to pay the difference between the ‘reasonable and customary’ cost and the ‘billed charge’. For an out-of-network claim the ‘billed charge’ is unknown for forecasting purposes, hence the assumption is required. It further assumes all claim costs are re-priced claim charges (after applying the network discount by the health plan). This is to take the billed charge and the amount of network discount out of consideration, which varies widely and is provider-specific. Still further, it assumes the person in the family who utilizes the healthcare services more will utilize the services earlier than others. The deductible limit and out-of-pocket maximum limit dictate, among other factors, the cost that the consumer has to bear. To forecast the cost-split between the family members, the sequence in which they will visit the doctors/hospitals should be known, hence the assumption. Other assumptions may be made in accordance with the invention in order to more accurately render an output.
The cost simulator engine 230 iterates the product benefit structure elements through the claim cost structure categories for each of the family members in a specific sequence, to come up with the output.
The product ranking and recommendation engine 220 is a state-less service engine, working as a higher-level decision maker, which calls the product specific cost simulator engine 230, triggering parallel threads (one for every product) and collects the results in an array, once all the threads complete their execution. It then sorts the array in ascending order of consumer's total out-of-pocket cost (sum of monthly premium cost and monthly average claim expense cost share) to determine the final ranking. Whichever product has the lowest total out-of-pocket cost for the consumer will become the recommended product. The inputs for this engine include, in an exemplary embodiment: an array of products that are to be simulated and ranked; the monthly premium cost to be paid by the consumer, for each of the products; and categorized claim cost structure per family member. The output 300 for this engine is a sorted array of ranked and recommended products along with the total out-of-pocket cost for the consumer for each product.
The claim or survey-based cost categorization methodology 210 provides a way for the consumer to intuitively forecast the healthcare service needs for next year for each member of his family, either via reviewing their historical claims or via responses to a survey, at the choice of the consumer. The methodology involves collecting the claim data or the survey data from the consumer, analyzing it, and converting it into a set of standardized healthcare service categories that can be subsequently used in downstream processing. The methodology produces the same output structure no matter which process the consumer used (i.e., reliance on claim data or survey data). For each of the chronic conditions or procedures that are chosen by the consumer in the survey, the complexity driven cost of care modeling engine is called to produce the standard categorized cost structure.
In the exemplary embodiment, the survey asks between several questions for each of the family member, depending on relevance, as needed, for example:
Overall Health:
Identify (e.g., from a list) any prescription taken regularly
Identify (e.g., from a list) pre-existing chronic conditions (Diabetes, heart condition, cancer etc.). This question may only be presented if the consumer has indicated in the first question that he/she has some chronic condition that needs to be managed.
Identify (e.g., from a list) planned/probable procedures for next year (pregnancy, hip replacement, hysterectomy, etc.)
Identify (e.g., from a list) preferred providers.
The cost categorization methodology 250 classifies four types of claim sources (Doctor's Office, Hospitals, Pharmacies and Labs) into the following claim cost categories, in the exemplary embodiment, depending on specific factors (place of service, service category, doctor/Hospital/Clinic specialization, deliverable category etc):
Preventive office visits such as immunizations, annual health check
Non-Preventive office visits with a general or family practice doctor
Non-Preventive office visit with a specialty doctor, such as Cardiologist, Gastroenterologist
Generic drug prescriptions
Branded drug prescriptions
Specialty restricted drug prescriptions, such as for fertility, Cancer, AIDS
Emergency room visit at a hospital
Outpatient surgery at a hospital with no overnight stay
Hospitalization with overnight stay
General lab tests
Diagnostic imaging lab tests, such as MM, CAT scan, Sonograms
The complexity driven cost-of-care modeling engine 240 is a state-less service engine that expresses the cost-of-care of a procedure (like a surgery) or a condition (like Diabetes or heart disease) in a standard categorized claim cost structure for a finite range of predetermined complexity tiers. The input to this engine is the name of the condition or procedure. The outputs include:
(1) Complexity Tiers: This is a methodology that assigns predetermined tiers to different levels of complexity that may occur in a procedure or condition. The cost-of-care will vary significantly between the different tiers. For example, the complexity tiers for Diabetes could be: Controlled with tablets; Controlled with Insulin; Taking Insulin, not in control, possible effect on eyes and feet; Taking Insulin, not in control, possible hospitalizations, amputations, history of Diabetes-triggered stroke. Another example of the complexity tiers for Maternity could be: Normal delivery expected, no history of complications; Caesarean delivery expected: history of some complications or multiple births; Caesarean delivery expected/history of substantial complications, premature delivery possible.
(2) Categorized Claim Cost Structure: This is an interface that categorizes four types of claim sources (Doctor's Office, Hospitals, Pharmacies & Labs) into, e.g., the following eleven well-defined claim cost categories depending on specific factors (place of service, service category, doctor/Hospital/Clinic specialization, deliverable category etc):
Preventive office visits such as immunizations, annual health check
Non-Preventive office visits with a general or family practice doctor
Non-Preventive office visit with a specialty doctor, such as Cardiologist, Gastroenterologist
Generic drug prescriptions
Branded drug prescriptions
Specialty restricted drug prescriptions, such as for fertility, Cancer, AIDS
Emergency room visit at a hospital
Outpatient surgery at a hospital with no overnight stay
Hospitalization with overnight stay
General lab tests
Diagnostic imaging lab tests, such as MRI, CAT scan, Sonograms
The tiering methodology is based on determining the yearly cost for a condition and on episodal cost of a procedure, as well as on recognizing the incremental complexity of a condition/procedure. This goes beyond the cost of a just specific surgery or doctor visit, but takes into account the ancillary necessary costs (e.g., the cost of 2-months of physiotherapy sessions, necessary imaging needs, and the Titanium alloy replacement hipbone on top of the surgery cost for a hip replacement procedure). This type of data is collected and categorized by software on a very large volume of claims that had the related CTP/HICPC code, ICD9 diagnosis code, ICD9 surgery procedure code, place of service code combinations. For each of the chronic conditions or procedures that have been chosen by the consumer in the survey, this complexity driven cost of care modeling engine will be called to produce the standard categorized cost structure.
The methods and systems, in some embodiments, allow the consumer to create multiple ‘what-if’ scenario profiles to forecast cost: The system offers to the consumer an easy way to perform multiple situational forecasting scenarios depending on, e.g.:
Which family members will be covered
Which optional or life-changing event may happen next year, e.g., a pregnancy, any high priced surgical procedure like knee/hip replacement
How the consumer wants to forecast: Claim based way or the survey based way
The system may store all the ‘what-if’ scenarios that the consumer has created and will let the consumer run the product recommendation process on any of those. This produces the recommended product for every ‘what-if’ scenario, each of which may differ from the others depending on the degree of difference between the scenarios.
With reference to
With reference to
Exemplary hardware and software employed by the systems are now generally described with reference to
To the extent data and information is communicated over the Internet, one or more Internet servers 1508 may be employed. The Internet server 1508 also comprises one or more processors 1509, computer readable storage media 1511 that store programs (computer readable instructions) for execution by the processor(s) 1509, and an interface 1510 between the processor(s) 1509 and computer readable storage media 1511. The Internet server 1504 is employed to deliver content that can be accessed through the communications network, e.g., by end user 1512. When data is requested through an application, such as an Internet browser, the Internet server 1508 receives and processes the request. The Internet server 1508 sends the data or application requested along with user interface instructions for displaying a user interface.
The computers referenced herein are specially programmed to perform the functionality described herein as performed by the software programs.
The non-transitory computer readable storage media may include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Computer readable storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, Erasable Programmable ROM (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD), or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer system.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/544,774 filed Oct. 7, 2011, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61544774 | Oct 2011 | US |