The present invention generally relates to the heat treatment of cast aluminum alloy components, and more specifically to the solution heat treatment of aluminum alloy castings formed in a high pressure die cast manufacturing process.
Interest in aluminum alloys as structural parts or components for automobiles and other vehicles has greatly increased in recent years, due to their potential for reducing weight while matching the yield strength and elongation properties of steel alloys. Unfortunately, the manufacture of structural components made from aluminum alloys continues to provide challenges for the transportation industries, as the typical processes for producing high quality and defect free parts remain costly and time consuming.
High Pressure Die Casting (HPDC) is one manufacturing process that can be used with aluminum alloys which holds great promise for producing quality cast parts or components at increased production rates for a substantially lower cost. This manufacturing technique also has its drawbacks, however, as aluminum alloy castings formed in an HPDC process often include a higher content of entrained or dissolved gases. It is generally recognized that the elevated gas content can lead to an increased number of internal and surface defects when the castings are subsequently heat treated to their solution temperatures (sometimes referred to as their solutionizing heat treatment temperatures) in a typical T4, T6 or T7 tempering process that will impart the cast components with their ultimate mechanical properties. The resulting high percentage of rejected scrap parts can substantially offset the other benefits of the HDPC process.
Consequently, a need exists for systems and methods for heat treating HPDC components which can better accommodate their high gas content while reducing the high scrap rates. It is toward such a system and method that the present disclosure is directed.
Briefly described, one embodiment of the present disclosure comprises a method for heat treating a cast aluminum alloy component, or casting, having a silicon constituent and one or more metal alloying constituents. The silicon constituent has a predetermined silicon solution temperature, above which there is substantial or accelerated solutionizing of the silicon constituent (i.e. with the silicon rapidly entering into solid solution), and below which there is little or no substantial solutionizing of the silicon constituent. The one or more metal alloying constituents also have predetermined alloying metal solution temperatures above which the alloying metals rapidly enters into solid solution. The method includes heating the casting to a first casting temperature that is below, and preferably less than 10° C. below, the predetermined silicon solution temperature, and then increasing the rate of heat input into the casting to heat the casting to a second casting temperature that is above, and preferably less than 10° C. above, the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature. The method further includes maintaining the casting at the second casting temperature for a period of time that is less than or about 20 minutes, and then quenching the casting to a temperature less than or about 250° C.
In some embodiments the method also includes maintaining the casting at the second casting temperature for at least two minutes, or five minutes, or more, up to the 20 minutes disclosed above. For instance, in one aspect the casting can be maintained at the second casting temperature until the casting achieves a time-in-treatment ratio greater than 50%, with the time-in-treatment ratio being generally defined by the duration of time the casting spent above the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature divided by a duration of time the casting spent above the predetermined silicon solution temperature. In other aspects the casting can achieve a time-in-treatment ratio between 70% and 90%.
In accordance with another embodiment, the present disclosure also includes a system for heat treating aluminum alloy castings having a silicon constituent and one or more metal alloying constituents. The system includes a heat treatment furnace having a first heating stage maintained at a first stage temperature that is below, and preferably less than 10° C. below, a predetermined silicon solution temperature for the silicon constituent. The first heating stage is followed by a second heating stage that is configured to increase the rate of heat input into the casting to heat the casting to a second stage temperature that is above, and preferably less than 10° C. above, a predetermined alloying metal solution temperature for the at least one metal alloying constituent. The furnace also includes an intake door that defines the beginning of the first heating stage, an intermediate door separating the first heating stage and the second heating stage, a discharge door defining the end of the second heating stage, and a transport apparatus configured to convey a plurality of castings through the furnace enclosure from the intake door through to the discharge door. The transport apparatus may be configured to maintain each of the castings within the second heating stage for a period of time that is greater than 3 minutes and less than 30 minutes.
In one aspect the transport apparatus can be configured to convey the castings through the furnace at a substantially constant speed. and the location of the intermediate door along the length of the furnace is repositionable. In other aspects the transport apparatus can be configured to convey the castings through the first heating stage of the furnace at a first speed and through the second heating stage of the furnace at a second speed that is different from the first speed.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, the present disclosure also includes a method for heat treating aluminum alloy castings having a silicon constituent and one or more metal alloying constituents. The method includes the step of moving a casting into a first heating stage of a furnace maintained at a first stage temperature to heat the casting to a first casting temperature that is less than 10° C. below a predetermined silicon solution temperature for the silicon constituent. The method also includes the step of moving the casting from the first heating stage into a second heating stage of the furnace that is separate from the first heating stage and maintained at a second stage temperature that is greater than the first stage temperature, to increase the rate of heat input into the casting and heat the casting to a second casting temperature that is less than 10° C. above a predetermined alloying metal solution temperature for the at least one metal alloying constituent. The method further includes the steps of maintaining the casting at the second casting temperature for a period of time that is less than or about 20 minutes, removing the casting from the second heating stage of the furnace, and quenching the casting to a temperature less than or about 250° C.
The invention will be better understood upon review of the detailed description set forth below taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures, which are briefly described as follows.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that, according to common practice, various features and elements of the drawings described above are not necessarily drawn to scale, and that the dimensions of the various features and elements may be expanded or reduced to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure described therein.
The present disclosure relates to a system and method for heat treating cast aluminum alloy components, or castings, including but not limited to aluminum alloy components that are formed in a high pressure die cast manufacturing process. As described below, the system and method can provide several significant advantages and benefits over other systems and methods for heat treating similar cast aluminum alloy components. However, the recited advantages are not meant to be limiting in any way, as one skilled in the art will appreciate that other advantages may also be realized upon practicing the present disclosure.
In addition, those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that changes can be made to the described embodiments while still obtaining the beneficial results. It will also be apparent that some of the advantages and benefits of the described embodiments can be obtained by selecting some of the features of the embodiments without utilizing other features, and that features from one embodiment may be combined with features from other embodiments in any appropriate combination. For example, any individual or collective features of method embodiments may be applied to apparatus, product or system embodiments, and vice versa. Accordingly, those who work in the art will recognize that many modifications and adaptations to the embodiments described are possible and may even be desirable in certain circumstances, and are a part of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is provided as an illustration of the principles of the embodiments and not in limitation thereof, since the scope of the invention is to be defined by the claims.
Referring now in more detail to the drawing figures, wherein like parts are identified with like reference numerals throughout the several views,
In addition, in one aspect the alloying constituents can be divided into those having relatively low solution temperature ranges, such as silicon and copper, and those having relatively high solution temperatures, such as magnesium and manganese. In the particular case of the silicon, the range of solution temperatures for the silicon constituent can be quite large and somewhat variable, depending on the alloy, with low levels of silicon solutionizing occurring at temperatures below 440° C. to 470° C. and accelerating rates of silicon solutionizing taking place at temperatures above 470° C. to 490° C., Also depending on the alloy, a copper constituent can have a range of solution temperatures (generally between 475° C. and 495° C.) that is near to or even overlapped by the range of silicon solution temperatures in some embodiments, while the magnesium constituent and manganese constituent can generally have ranges of solution temperatures extending from 490° C. to 540° C.
As discussed above, the cast aluminum alloy components can be formed through a high pressure die casting (HPDC) process in which the molten metal is injected into a mold or die at high pressure and at high speed or gate velocity. While increasing production rates and lowering costs, the HPDC process typically results in the castings containing a higher content of dissolved or entrained gases than aluminum alloy components formed from low pressure die casting (LPDC), sand/SPM casting, or high vacuum die casting (HVDC) processes. U.S. Pat. No. 8,409,374 to Lumley et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety herein, hypothesizes that the increased gas content can lead to the development of gas pore-based defects, such as surface blistering and dimensional instability, during the solution heat treatment that is generally applied to the parts after casting to improve their mechanical properties. It is this undesirable expansion of the gas pores that can result in excessive scrap rates if the castings remain at the higher solution temperatures for an extended period of time.
Consequently, it was suggested in Lumley that the time window for heat treating the HPDC aluminum alloy components to a desired [alloy] solution treatment temperature, including the heating time, should be much shorter than previously contemplated, and that the solution treatment state should be effectively non-isothermal (i.e. at a non-constant temperature). It was further suggested that the time spent by the castings in isothermal solution treatment (i.e. at a constant solution treatment temperature) was less important than the time spent within a specific temperature range and the final temperature reached prior to quenching.
While the concepts set forth in Lumley for avoiding high scrap rates by limiting the time spent by the castings within a specific temperature range can be observed in practice, it has been further determined by the present inventors that improved mechanical properties for the HDPC aluminum alloy parts, beyond those suggested by Lumley, can be achieved through a more controlled solutionizing heat treatment process that includes one or more substantially isothermal portions near or above one or more alloying metal solution temperatures.
For example, and without being bound to any particular theory, it is contemplated by the present inventors that the internal “pore-making” process that leads to the formation and expansion of the internal pores or gas bubbles within the castings begins with the silicon constituent of the aluminum alloy being taken into solid solution as the casting reaches or exceeds the silicon solution temperature. As the silicon is taken into solution, the size of the silicon particles appears to shrink as the overall number of silicon particles appears to grow, thereby allowing the entrained gases within the casting to migrate throughout the material. Eventually, however, the trend reverses as the smaller silicon particles grow together into larger particles that hinder or dam the migration of the gas. The entrapped gas then combines together into bubbles or pores that will continue to grow for as long as the casting is maintained at an elevated temperature. If left unchecked, the enlarged bubbles or pores near the surface can break through the surface as blisters, while the enlarged bubbles or pores internal to the casting can cause dimensional distortions.
Because the range of solution temperatures of the silicon constituent is substantially less than the range of the solution temperatures of at least one of the metal alloying constituents, such as magnesium and manganese, it is further theorized that the solutionizing heat treatment of the aluminum alloy that ultimately results in the desired improvements in mechanical properties may not begin until the castings are heated to the highest alloying metal solution temperature, well after the “pore-making” process has begun. By recognizing and taking into consideration the differences between the lower range of silicon solution temperatures and the higher range of alloying metal solution temperatures, the inventors have developed a method or process (and related systems) for heat treating cast aluminum alloy components that can be particularly advantageous over existing heat treatments for HPDC aluminum alloy parts that do not recognize this difference. For instance, the time spent by the castings above both the relatively low solution temperature of the silicon constituent and the relatively high solution temperature of the metal alloying constituent, prior to quenching, can be controlled to produce cast aluminum alloy components having superior mechanical properties at reduced scrap rates, and with the castings having a substantial reduction in dimensional distortions that would otherwise result from the formation of enlarged bubbles of entrapped gases.
As illustrated in
Alternatively, if it is recognized that the upper boundary for the range of silicon solution temperatures in a particular aluminum alloy overlaps the range of a lower temperature metal alloying constituent, such as copper, the upper boundary may acceptably be identified as the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14. This can be advantageous by allowing at least a partial solutionizing of the copper constituent within a first heating stage while still restricting the accelerated solutionizing of the silicon constituent.
Conversely, the upper boundary for particular ranges of solution temperatures for the one for more metal alloying constituents will generally be the value of greatest interest, in which case the upper boundary for that range may acceptably be identified as the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18. For example, the range of solution temperatures for the copper alloying constituent of an exemplary aluminum alloy can range between about 485° C. to about 495° C., while the range of solution temperatures for the magnesium alloying constituent of the same alloy can range between about 510° C. to about 530° C. Thus, in one aspect the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 may acceptably be identified as 530° C. to ensure that all of the metal alloying components reach their solution temperatures.
It is contemplated that the silicon constituent of some aluminum alloys may begin to slowly solutionize at about 420° C., but at a reduced rate that does not quickly lead to the enlarged silicon particles that impede the movement of the entrained gases within the casting. The solutionizing rate of the silicon constituent can then rapidly increase at casting temperatures higher than 440° C., such as between 470° C. and 490° C., so that a substantial portion of the silicon constituent will enter into solid solution within a short period of time, once the casting enters this range of casting temperatures, to fully initiate the process of silicon particle size reduction and subsequent enlargement described above. For reasons set forth below, the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14 will generally be set at a casting temperature slightly below or within the range of temperatures associated with the accelerated solutionizing rates of the silicon constituent (for example, 440° C. to 470° C.), yet which may still be above the casting temperature associated with the onset of solutionizing of the silicon constituent at the reduced rate.
It is also appreciated, however, that the metallurgical arts do not always lend themselves to precision values or clear-cut determinations in practice, so that even the ranges of temperature values for one or more of the solution temperatures may not be known with high accuracy. Thus, in other aspects the predetermined solution temperature can be an inter mediate value, such as an average or a median value, for that range of solution temperature values. In addition, it is contemplated that the predetermined solution temperatures 14, 18 of a particular aluminum alloy may be identified, for example, in a laboratory, through previous experience, or through ongoing quality control and evaluation during a manufacturing cycle, with subsequent adjustments of the predetermined solution temperatures 14, 18 to further refine the heat treatment method for a particular aluminum alloy, or for a particular type of casting, or both.
In embodiments when the aluminum alloy has two or more metal alloying constituents in significant amounts, such as both copper and magnesium, the combination of metal alloying constituents can often result in a range of combined alloying metal solution temperatures that is different from the range of alloying metal solution temperatures for each metal alloying constituent when taken separately. For example, in one embodiment the range of solution temperatures for the alloying constituents of an aluminum alloy with copper and magnesium alloying constituents can range between about 490° C. to about 515° C., and the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 can be identified as 515° C. For other cases in which the ranges of casting temperatures at which the various metal alloying constituents are taken into solid solution remain distinct and different, in one aspect the single greatest value in the ranges of alloying metal solution temperatures can be identified as the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18. Alternatively, an intermediate value in the ranges of alloying metal solution temperatures can also be used, as described above.
It will thus be appreciated by one of skill in the art that the values or ranges for both the silicon solution temperature and the alloying metal solution temperature can vary depending on the composition of the aluminum alloy, including but not limited to the presence of the different varying metal constituents and their weight percentages. Accordingly, the heat treatment method 10 of the present disclosure can include a customized casting temperature profile 12 for each alloy that is based on the principle that the silicon constituent of the aluminum alloy will transition into solid solution at a lower temperature, and therefore sooner, than the metal alloying constituents.
With continued reference to
It will be appreciated that both the time duration (t1) 24 and the heating rate 22 (or alternative heating rate 23) of the castings in the first heating stage 20 can vary substantially between different embodiments of the heat treatment method 10. For reference purposes, the rise/run of the first heating rate 22 is defined as ° C./min, and can be applied as an instantaneous heating rate or as an average heating rate during a specified period of time, such as, for example, the entire first heating stage 20 or merely a portion of the first heating stage 20. Factors that affect the duration (t1) and/or the first heating rate 22 can include the type and configuration of the furnace, the initial temperature 21 of the castings when the castings first enter the furnace, the thickness and/or the surface area exposure of the castings, the number of castings in a tray of castings, and the like.
For instance, in some embodiments the castings may be quite thick, such as the castings for an engine block, and it is generally preferable for all of the material of the thick castings to reach the first casting temperature 25 prior to entering the second heating stage 30. In other embodiments a batch of castings may be loaded into a tray or rack of castings in a configuration that is dense enough to affect the flow of thermal fluids to the individual castings, and it is likewise preferable for all of the castings within the batch to reach the first casting temperature 25 prior to entering the second heating stage 30. Greater uniformity in reaching the first casting temperature 25 for all portions of the castings, or for all of the castings loaded within a tray or rack, may be achieved by allowing the castings to soak at the first casting temperature 25 for a few minutes 2-5 minutes or a more extended time period) toward the end of the first heating stage 20 to provide ample time for the heat to become evenly distributed throughout the castings. Moreover, by ensuring that the first casting temperature 25 is sufficiently below the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14, this uniformity in treatment can be accomplished without concern for substantial solutionizing of the silicon constituent.
As shown by casting temperature line 12 in
Alternatively, as shown by alternative first stage casting temperature line 13, in other aspects the first heating stage of the furnace can be maintained at a relatively constant first stage temperature that is equal to or above the first casting temperature 25. In this way the flow of heat into the castings, and thus the first heating rate 23, continuously decreases throughout the first heating stage 20 as the castings slowly approach a state of thermal equilibrium with the first stage temperature. In embodiments where first stage temperature is greater than the first casting temperature 25, the movement of the castings through the furnace can be timed so that the castings reach the first casting temperature 25 and exit the first heating stage 20 prior to reaching thermal equilibrium with the first stage temperature. In embodiments where the first stage temperature is equal to the first casting temperature 25, the time duration (t1) 24 of the castings within the first heating stage 20 can be extended so that the castings can reach a thermal equilibrium at the first casting temperature 25 prior to exiting the first heating stage 20.
In yet other embodiments the castings may be thin-walled structures that are spaced apart with a greater proportion of exposed surface area that readily receives and distributes the applied heat, so that each casting reaches thermal equilibrium at the first casting temperature 25 in a much shorter period of time, in which case the thermal soaking period may be reduce or eliminated.
Thus, upon review of both casting temperature line 12 and alternative casting temperature line 13 shown in
Accordingly, in one aspect the first heating stage can be maintained at a first stage temperature that is less than 10° C. below the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14. In another aspect the first heating stage 10 can be maintained at a first stage temperature that is greater than the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14, so as to provide an increase in the first heating rate 22 throughout the first heating stage 20 with a corresponding decrease in the time duration (t1) 24 of the first heating stage, and which can further include accurate control of the movement of the castings through the first heating stage 20 to ensure that the castings exit the first heating stage 20 prior to reaching the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14.
Upon reaching the first casting temperature 25 at the end of the first heating stage 20, the castings can then transition or move into the second heating stage 30 of the heat treatment process 10 that generally comprises a second period of time (t2) 34 extending from the entrance of the castings into the second heating stage 30 until their exit and movement into the quench stage 40. Upon entry into the second heating stage 30, the heat input into the castings can be immediately or sharply increased to quickly raise the temperature of the castings from the first casting temperature 25 to a second casting temperature 35 that is greater than or substantially equal to the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18. In one aspect the castings can then be maintained at the second casting temperature 35 for the remainder of the time period (t2) 34 of the second heating stage 30 in a substantially isothermal (i.e. constant temperature) portion 37 of the process 10. Depending on the time taken to heat the castings from the first casting temperature 25 to the second casting temperature 35 after entry into the second heating stage 30, the substantially isothermal portion 37 of the heat treatment process 10 at the second casting temperature 35 can preferably range from about 10 minutes to about 20 minutes. Nevertheless, substantially isothermal portions 37 that are less than 10 minutes in duration, such as between 5 minutes and 2 minutes in duration, are also possible and considered to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
In yet another aspect of the present disclosure (not shown) the castings may be quenched promptly after reaching the second casting temperature 35. Accordingly, in this embodiment the only isothermal portion of the casting temperature may be the heat soak period at the first casting temperature 25 near the end of the first heating stage 20 and prior to entering the second heating stage 30, so that all of the castings or portions of the castings reach the first casting temperature prior to being exposed to the increased heat input within the second heating stage.
In one aspect the second casting temperature 35 can be between about 5° C. and 10° C. above the predetermined solution temperature 18 of the metal alloying constituent, in order to ensure that the metal alloying constituent in all portions of the casting reaches or exceeds the alloying metal solution temperature and enters into solid solution, but without excessively exceeding the alloying metal solution temperature in ways that could lead to detrimental side effects. In other aspects, such as when the alloying metal solution temperature is precisely known and the heat treatment process 10 can be tightly controlled, the second casting temperature 35 can be 5° C. or less above the predetermined solution temperature 18 of the metal alloying constituent.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment the second heating stage 30 of the furnace can be maintained at a substantially constant second stage temperature that is greater than the first stage temperature, thereby increasing the rate of heat input into the castings during at least the first portion of the second heating stage 30. Thus, in one aspect the additional heat input needed to quickly raise the temperature of the castings to the second casting temperature 35 can be provided by an additional heating apparatus, such as directed heaters or high flow hot air nozzles, that can direct additional heat onto the castings and provide a boost to the initial second heating rate 32. In this way, for example, the castings can be heated to within 5° C. of the second casting temperature within 5 minutes or less of entering the second stage. Moreover, the additional heating apparatus can be configured to raise the temperature of the castings to the second casting temperature 35 in a shortened period of time without substantially raising the overall second stage temperature in the second heating stage portion of the furnace.
Once the castings reach the second casting temperature 35 that is associated with the substantially isothermal portion 37 of the process 10, the second stage temperature can prevent the flow of heat away from the castings for the remainder of the time period (t2) 34 of the second heating stage 30. In one aspect the second stage temperature can be substantially equal to the second casting temperature 35, while in other aspects the second stage temperature can be marginally higher than the second casting temperature 35 so that the temperature of the castings continues to rise slightly during the remainder of the second heater stage, but typically only a small amount as the time remaining in the second heating stage is relatively short. In one embodiment the second stage temperature can be less than or about 10° C. above the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 at which the at least one metal alloying constituent rapidly enters into solid solution.
In comparing the period of time (t3) 36 the castings spend at or above the predetermined solution temperature 18 of the metal alloying constituent with the overall time duration (t2) 34 of the second heating stage 30, as measured from entering the second heating stage 30 to entering the quench stage 40, the (t3)/(t2) timing ratio of the castings at the alloying metal solution temperature 18 can be 50% or greater. This timing ratio can also be known as the time-in-treatment ratio. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the time-in-treatment ratio can be a good approximation of the actual percentage of time that the castings spend in the solutionizing heat treatment at or above the alloying metal solution temperature at which the metal alloying constituent rapidly enters into solid solution, in addition to being at or above the silicon solution temperature at which the silicon constituent rapidly enters into solid solution. It will also be appreciated that the time-in-treatment ratio provided by the present disclosure can be substantially increased over solution heat treatment methods for HPDC castings currently known and practiced in the art.
Indeed, depending on the temperature differentials between the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14 and the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 and between the first casting temperature 25 and the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14, as well as the configuration of the furnace, it is contemplated that in some embodiments the (t3)/(t2) time-in-treatment ratio of the castings at or above the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 can be greater than 60%, greater than 70%, or even 80% or greater. For example, if it has been determined that the (t2) value for a particular alloy is limited to 18 minutes in order to avoid the manifestation of blistering and/or dimensional distortion on a high percentage of the castings, a (t3)/(t2) time-in-treatment ratio of 75% can ensure that the castings are maintained at or above the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature for about 13.5 minutes. In this way the castings can obtain a substantial increase in the beneficial affects of an alloying metal solutionizing heat treatment while avoiding the harmful effects of the pore-based defects by limiting the time spent at or above the silicon solution temperature.
It will thus be appreciated that heating the castings in the first heating stage 20 to a first casting temperature 25 that is near to the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14, yet without reaching or exceeding the predetermined silicon solution temperature 14, can be advantageous for both reducing the heating requirements in the second heating stage 30, and for reducing the time needed to reach the predetermined alloying metal solution temperature 18 as the castings are heated to the second casting temperature 35 in the second heating stage 30.
Furthermore, and as discussed above, maintaining the castings at the first casting temperature 25 for an extended period of time can advantageously ensure that all the castings or portions of the castings reach the first casting temperature 25 prior to being exposed to the increased heat input within the second heating stage 30. In this way a thermal equilibrium point can be established at a midpoint within the heat treatment process that can operate to improve the uniformity and consistency of the finished castings. In addition, since there is no limitation in the time duration of the first heating stage 20 as there is with the second heating stage 30, the duration 24 of the first heating stage 20 can be extended as long as necessary (to 15 minutes to 20 minutes or more, for example) to establish substantial thermal equilibrium within the castings or a batch of castings.
Upon reaching the end of the second heating stage 30, the castings can then transition or move into the quench stage 40 of the heat treatment process 10 in which the castings are quickly cooled from the second casting temperature 35 to a quenched temperature 45 that is generally less than 250° C. but still well above ambient temperature. The quench stage 40 generally comprises a liquid spray cooling system, a forced air or gas cooling system, a liquid immersion cooling system, or combinations of the above. During the quench stage 40 the castings can be cooled at a cooling rate 42 for a time period (t4) 44 that generally ranges from one to about five minutes. After completion of the quench stage 40, the castings can be removed to ambience and allowed to cool and naturally age for a T4 temper, or to a separate temperature controlled chamber (not shown but known to one of skill in the art) for artificial aging at an elevated temperature for a predetermined period of time to achieve a T6 temper. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, other quenching and aging protocols are also possible and considered to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
Also visible in
As shown in
In one aspect the process furnace 150 can include an internal barrier with a gate or intermediate door 164 that divides the interior of the insulated enclosure 154 into a first heating stage 120 and a second heating stage 130 that coincide with the first heating stage 120 and second heating stage 130 depicted in
In another aspect the temperature of the first heating stage 120 can be maintained at the first casting temperature 125 and the time duration Op 124 can be extended until thermal equilibrium is gradually established between castings 105 and the heated air in the first heating stage 120. This can create an alternative casting temperature line 113 defined by an alternative heating rate 123 that continuously decreases throughout the first heating stage 120 as the castings slowly approach a state of thermal equilibrium with the first stage temperature, similar to that shown in
In the representative embodiments of the solution heat treatment method 110 illustrated in
The representative process furnace 150 in
Once the castings 105 move through the first transition zone 129, i.e. the intermediate door 164, to enter the second heating stage 130, an initial second stage heating rate 132 of about 25° C./min can be applied to the castings to quickly raise their temperatures to the second casting temperature 135 of 490° C. in about 3 minutes, with some tapering in the heating rate 132 as the castings approach the second casting temperature 135. The castings can then be maintained at the second casting temperature 135, in the substantially isothermal portion 137 of the process 110, for the remaining 15 minutes in the second heating stage 30 until the castings reach the discharge door 158 and move through the second transition zone 139 to exit the furnace 150 and enter the quenching stage 140 (with the quenching station not being shown in
After passing through the second transition zone 139 and entering the quench stage 140, the castings 105 can be cooled from the second casting temperature 135 of 490° C. to a quench temperature 145 that is less than 250° C., in less than three minutes, and at a cooling rate that can be greater than 80° C./min.
Also visible in
Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the output of the heater assembly in the first heating cell of the second heating stage 130 may not be sufficient to raise the initial or second heating rate 132 to the desired value. In this case one or more additional heating apparatus 168, such as an additional heater or hot air nozzle, can be added to the affected heating cell to direct additional heat onto the castings 105 and provide a boost in the initial or second heating rate 132 that will raise the temperature of the castings to the second casting temperature 135 in a shortened period of time. For furnaces 150 having an adjustable intermediate door 164, empty supporting fixtures filled with insulating spacers 169 can also be provided at each additional optional location, so that the additional heating apparatus 168 can be repositionable along with the intermediate door 164.
The process furnace 170 schematically illustrated in
In this embodiment of the process furnace 170, however, the position of the intermediate door 184 along the length of the enclosure 154 can be fixed and the conveyor system can comprise conveyor chains 172, 173 (i.e. parallel synchronized pairs of chains) having independently controllable operating speeds. The two independently controllable conveyor chains 172, 173 can provide the user with the capability of independently configuring the time duration (t1) of the first heating stage and the time duration (t2) of the second heating stage, which in turn can allow for optimization of both the first heating rate 122 and the (t3)/(t2) time-in-treatment ratio in the second heating stage 130. In one aspect the two conveyor chains 172, 173 can meet together at the first transition zone 129 (i.e. the intermediate door 184), as illustrated in
The solution heat treating system 250 illustrated in the plan view of
Also shown in
With the batch-type heat treating furnaces 260 of the solution heat treating system 250 of
Despite the possible inefficiencies of batch-type heat treating resulting from the repeated heat cycling within the furnace chamber, one advantage provided by the heat treating furnaces 260 of
In the inactive position illustrated in
As shown in
As indicated above, the invention has been described herein in terms of preferred embodiments and methodologies considered by the inventor to represent the best mode of carrying out the invention. It will be understood by the skilled artisan, however, that a wide range of additions, deletions, and modifications, both subtle and gross, may be made to the illustrated and exemplary embodiments of the composite substrate without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. These and other revisions might be made by those of skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention that is constrained only by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/140,533, filed Apr. 28, 2016; which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/153,724, filed Apr. 28, 2015; which applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein, and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2385962 | Barnett | Oct 1945 | A |
2813318 | Horth | Nov 1957 | A |
2988351 | Barnett et al. | Jun 1961 | A |
3194545 | Smith | Jul 1965 | A |
3222227 | Baugh et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3432368 | Nakamura | Mar 1969 | A |
3534946 | Wasterkamp et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3604695 | Steeper | Sep 1971 | A |
3675905 | Placek | Jul 1972 | A |
3737280 | Cromp | Jun 1973 | A |
3760800 | Staffin et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3794232 | Petri | Feb 1974 | A |
3856583 | Sanders et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3871438 | Vissers et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3977911 | Takase | Aug 1976 | A |
3996412 | Schaefer et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4021272 | Asai et al. | May 1977 | A |
4027862 | Schaefer et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4068389 | Staffin et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4098624 | Laird, Jr. | Jul 1978 | A |
4140467 | Ellison et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4161389 | Staffin et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4177085 | Chadwick et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4177952 | Rikker | Dec 1979 | A |
4211274 | Slowinski et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4242077 | Hyre | Dec 1980 | A |
4255133 | Tanifuji et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4257767 | Price | Mar 1981 | A |
4294436 | Takahashi | Oct 1981 | A |
4325424 | Scheffer | Apr 1982 | A |
4338077 | Shibayama et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4340433 | Harding | Jul 1982 | A |
4357135 | Wilde et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4392814 | Harding | Jul 1983 | A |
4411709 | Nakanishi | Oct 1983 | A |
4415444 | Guptail | Nov 1983 | A |
4419143 | Ito et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4420345 | Ito et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4457352 | Scheffer | Jul 1984 | A |
4457788 | Staffin et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4457789 | Wilks | Jul 1984 | A |
4478572 | Selli | Oct 1984 | A |
4490107 | Kimura et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4499940 | Hall | Feb 1985 | A |
4512821 | Staffin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4519718 | Staffin et al. | May 1985 | A |
4524957 | Staffin et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4544013 | Kearney et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4547228 | Girrell et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4577671 | Stephen | Mar 1986 | A |
4579319 | Sasaki | Apr 1986 | A |
4582301 | Wunning | Apr 1986 | A |
4604055 | Mackenzie | Aug 1986 | A |
4606529 | Fooch | Aug 1986 | A |
4613713 | Staffin et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4620586 | Musschoot | Nov 1986 | A |
4620884 | Heath | Nov 1986 | A |
4623400 | Japka et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4648836 | Thom | Mar 1987 | A |
4671496 | Girrell et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681267 | Leidel et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4700766 | Godderidge | Oct 1987 | A |
4752061 | Dalton et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4779163 | Bickford et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4817920 | Erfort, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830605 | Hodate et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832764 | Merz | May 1989 | A |
4878952 | Pillhoefer | Nov 1989 | A |
4955425 | McKenna | Sep 1990 | A |
5018707 | Hemsath et al. | May 1991 | A |
5108519 | Armanie et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108520 | Liu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5115770 | Yen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120372 | Yen et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5156800 | Buchet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5169913 | Staffin et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178695 | LaSalle et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5226983 | Skinner et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5251683 | Backer | Oct 1993 | A |
5253698 | Keough et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5294094 | Crafton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298094 | Ota et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306359 | Eppeland et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308410 | Hurimura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312498 | Anderson | May 1994 | A |
5336344 | Wei | Aug 1994 | A |
5340089 | Heath et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340418 | Wei | Aug 1994 | A |
5350160 | Crafton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354038 | Crafton | Oct 1994 | A |
5378434 | Staffin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5423370 | Bonnemersou et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439045 | Crafton | Aug 1995 | A |
5485985 | Eppeland et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514228 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518557 | Jones et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531423 | Crafton et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536337 | Wei | Jul 1996 | A |
5547523 | Blakenship, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551670 | Heath et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5551998 | Crafton et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5565046 | Crafton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571347 | Bergsma | Nov 1996 | A |
5593519 | Blankenship, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5643372 | Sainfort et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5738162 | Crafton | Apr 1998 | A |
5829509 | Crafton | Nov 1998 | A |
5850866 | Crafton | Dec 1998 | A |
6074501 | Baxter et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112803 | Kruger | Sep 2000 | A |
6125911 | Wust | Oct 2000 | A |
6217317 | Crafton et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6325873 | Pollkoetter | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6672367 | Crafton et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6910522 | Crafton et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910990 | Howard et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7025839 | Lumley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037391 | Lumley et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7258755 | Crafton et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7338629 | Crafton et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8409374 | Lumley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020104596 | Crafton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040035546 | DiSerio | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050072549 | Crafton et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050217771 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257858 | Crafton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269751 | Crafton | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20090288740 | Westerheide et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314392 | Wuerst et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100101689 | Wust et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101691 | Doty | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100224289 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224293 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243113 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130269843 | Wust et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1197981 | Dec 1985 | CA |
101001963 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101724796 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102000813 | Apr 2011 | CN |
103534364 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103930577 | Jul 2014 | CN |
2307773 | Feb 1973 | DE |
2323805 | May 1973 | DE |
2310541 | Sep 1973 | DE |
2315958 | Apr 1974 | DE |
2337894 | Nov 1974 | DE |
2914221 | Apr 1979 | DE |
3206048 | Feb 1982 | DE |
4012158 | Nov 1990 | DE |
195 30 975 | Feb 1997 | DE |
10 2006 049 869 | Apr 2008 | DE |
10 2008 056 511 | May 2010 | DE |
102008056511 | May 2010 | DE |
10 2011 105 447 | Dec 2012 | DE |
10 2011 122 764 | Dec 2012 | DE |
0 485 068 | May 1992 | EP |
0546210 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0610028 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0 621 904 | Nov 1994 | EP |
7043571 | Dec 1970 | FR |
2448573 | Feb 1979 | FR |
1392405 | Apr 1975 | GB |
1564151 | Apr 1980 | GB |
1569152 | Jun 1980 | GB |
2187398 | Sep 1987 | GB |
2230720 | Oct 1990 | GB |
355149772 | Nov 1980 | JP |
5653867 | May 1981 | JP |
5939464 | Aug 1982 | JP |
5825417 | Feb 1983 | JP |
5825860 | Feb 1983 | JP |
59219410 | Dec 1984 | JP |
6092040 | May 1985 | JP |
6274022 | Apr 1987 | JP |
6316853 | Jan 1988 | JP |
62110248 | May 1988 | JP |
63108941 | May 1988 | JP |
1-91957 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1-122658 | May 1989 | JP |
2104164 | Aug 1990 | JP |
3-465 | Jan 1991 | JP |
11-29843 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2005-264301 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-265582 | Oct 2006 | JP |
4341453 | Jul 2009 | JP |
10-2007-0052361 | May 2007 | KR |
10-2007-0091669 | Sep 2007 | KR |
1129012 | Jul 1982 | SU |
0234810 | Mar 1985 | SU |
WO 9730805 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9814291 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0036354 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 02063051 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 06066314 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Experimental Determination of 2-Component Phase Diagrams—Two Component (Binary) Phase Diagrams—Tulane University—Prof. Stephen A. Nelson—Feb. 7, 2011 (12 pages). |
Edgar Lange; Perfect Aluminum Casting; Casting Plant & Technology Jan. 2003; pp. 2-4. |
Omgega Research, Inc.; Aluminum-Mettallurgy—What Metal Finishers Should Know; 6 pages. |
R.N.Lumley et al.; The role of alloy composition in the heat treatment of aluminum high pressure die castings; Metallurigical Science & Technology; 2008—vol. 26-2; pp. 2-11. |
R.N. Lumley; Materials Science & Technologies; The Potential for Cost and Weigh Reduction in Transport Applications through the use of Heat Treated Aluminum High Pressure Diecastings; 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 29, 2016; from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/029654. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report & The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or Declaration dated Jul. 29, 2016; from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/029654. |
Lampman, S.R. & Zorc T.B.: “ASM Handbook—Heat Treating, vol. 4” 1991, ASM International, USA, XP-002357244—pp. 529-541. |
Economical Used Energy Type Continuing Heat Treating Furnance For Aluminum Castings Dogyo—Kanetsu vol. 21 No. 2 pp. 29-36—Mar. 1984. |
Brochures describing Beardsley & Pipe PNEU-RECLAIM Sand Reclamation Units Prior to Aug. 13, 1992. |
Brochure describing Fataluminum Sand Reclamation Units—Prior to Aug. 13, 1992. |
Paul M. Crafton—Heat Treating Aging System Also Permits Core Sand Removal—Reprinted from Sep. 1989 Modern Castings magazine. |
ASM Handbook, vol. 4 Heat Treating, pp. 465-474, Apr. 1993. |
The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th edition, pp. 1267-1276, Dec. 1989. |
Sales brochure describing Thermfire Brand Sand Reclamation, Gudgeon Bros., Ltd. Believed to be known to others prior to Sep. 1989. |
Sales brochure describing Simplicity/Richards Gas-Fired Thermal Reclamation System Simplicity Engineering, Inc.—believed to be known to others prior to Sep. 1989. |
Sales brochure describing AirTrac Brand Fluidizing Conveyor, AirTrac Systems Corp., believed to be known to others prior to Sep. 1989. |
Sales brochure describing Fluid Bed Calcifer Thermal Sand Reclamation Systems, Dependable Foundry Equipment Co.,—Believed to be known to others prior to Sep. 1989. |
Foundry Management & Technology—Dec. 1989—vol. 117; No. 12; p. G3—Shakeout/Cleaning/Finishing Brouchure. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2018, from European Patent Application No. 16787101.1. |
Diffusion of Silicon in Aluminum—Shin-Ichiro et al.—vol. 9A, Dec. 1978—pp. 1811-1815. |
The Development of High Strength and Ductility in High-Pressure Die-Cast Al—Si—Mg Alloys from Secondary Sources—Roger Lumley—Published online Sep. 10, 2018—pp. 382-390. |
Ductile Aluminum High-Pressure Die Casting Alloys for Automotive Applications—Koch & Franke, Aluminum Rheinfelden GmbH—Oct. 2004—pp. 6-11. |
Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Aluminum Alloys in the Form of Castings and Ingot—The Aluminum Association—Revised: Dec. 2015 Supersedes: Nov. 2009—Registration Record Series Pink Sheets. |
Standard Practice for Heat Treatment of Aluminum Alloys—Designation: B 597-92 (Reapproved 1998)—pp. 1-15. |
Effect of Iron in Al—Si Casting Alloys: A Critical Review—P.N. Crepeau—General Motors Powertrain Group—AFS Transactions—pp. 361-366. |
Ductile Alloys for high pressure die casting—Stig Brusethaug and Jorunn Snoan Maeland—Casting Plant & Technology International Apr. 2004—pp. 16-23. |
Iron in Aluminum Casting Alloys—A Literature Survey—A. Couture—AFS International Cast Metals Journal—Dec. 1981—pp. 9-17. |
Aluminum and aluminum alloys—Castings—Chemical composition and mechanical properties English version of DIN EN 1706—Jun. 1998. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200190648 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62153724 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15140533 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 16688153 | US |