System and method for ice detection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9846230
  • Patent Number
    9,846,230
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 21, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 19, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
A hazard warning or weather radar system or method can be utilized to determine a location of ice. The system and method can be used in an aircraft. The aircraft weather radar system can include a radar antenna and an electronic processor. The radar antenna receives radar returns. The processor determines levels of icing conditions and causes the levels to be displayed on an electronic display.
Description
BACKGROUND

This disclosure relates generally to the detection of ice or ice crystals in the atmosphere.


Hazardous weather is generally associated with convective weather cells. Convective weather cells can produce turbulence, high winds, lightning, hail, and other weather hazards. In addition, convective cells can provide large updrafts that loft large amounts of moisture to higher altitudes (e.g., high portions troposphere). The moisture can be super cooled liquid at temperatures much colder than the freezing point of water because the water was lofted quickly by the updraft and has not encountered condensation nuclei upon which to crystallize as ice.


Non-convective rain clouds (e.g., stratiform rain) can also include ice crystals. Non-convective rain clouds are striated with temperature. At low altitudes where the temperature is above the freezing point, liquid water is present as rain. At high altitudes where the temperature is below the freezing point, ice crystals form.


Conventional aircraft hazard weather radar systems, such as the WXR 2100 MultiScan™ radar system manufactured by Rockwell Collins, Inc., have Doppler capabilities and are capable of detecting at least four parameters: weather range, weather reflectivity, weather velocity, and weather spectral width or velocity variation. The weather reflectivity is typically scaled to green, yellow, and red color levels that are related to rainfall rate. The radar-detected radial velocity variation can be scaled to a turbulence level and displayed as magenta. Such weather radar systems can conduct vertical sweeps and obtain reflectivity parameters at various altitudes and can detect the presence of ice using reflectivity parameters and temperature. However, such detection of ice cannot be performed at longer ranges. In some embodiments, the radar may be a single frequency radar (e.g., X-band radar) or a multi-frequency radar (e.g., a radar with both X-band and Ka-band frequencies). In some embodiments, the single or multi-frequency radar may include polarization diversity capabilities.


Ice or ice crystal formation at high altitudes can pose various threats to aircraft. Flying through ice or ice crystal formation at high altitudes can cause engine roll back, engine stall, engine flameout, and incorrect airspeed measurements. Detecting areas of ice and ice crystal formation at longer ranges is desirable so that pilots can avoid such areas.


Thus, there is a need for a system and method for more accurate, long range detection of ice and/or ice crystals high in the troposphere. There is also a need for inferring the existence of ice and/or ice crystals based on the detection and analysis of convective cells or hazards associated therewith. There is also a need to distinguish highly convective ice crystal formation areas form non-convective stratiform rain areas that do not produce high altitude ice crystals. Further still, there is a need to detect and locate convective cells by measuring the amount of moisture (e.g., liquid water, such as total water content) present at altitudes where the temperature is below the freezing point. Yet further, there is a need for an aircraft hazard warning system optimized to determine the location and presence of large areas of high altitude ice resulting from convective cell blow off. Further, there is a need for an aircraft hazard warning system that includes inferential ice detection and location.


It would be desirable to provide a system and/or method that provides one or more of these or other advantageous features. Other features and advantages will be made apparent from the present specification. The teachings disclosed extend to those embodiments which fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the aforementioned needs.


SUMMARY

One embodiment of the disclosure relates to an aircraft weather radar system. The aircraft weather radar system can include a radar antenna and a processor. The radar antenna receives radar returns and a processor. The processor can be configured for: 1. identifying on a display a region of potential ice associated with a blow off region in response to the radar returns, temperature data, and wind data; or 2. identifying on a display a region of potential ice associated with a stratiform region in response to radar returns, temperature data, and a history of convective cells in the stratiform region.


Another embodiment of the disclosure relates to a method of displaying an indication of a presence of ice on an aircraft display in an avionics system. The method includes receiving radar reflectivity data and temperature data and determining a presence of at least one stratiform rain area, determining whether at least one convective cell was present in the stratiform rain area, and providing the indication in response to a size of the stratiform rain area.


Another embodiment of the disclosure relates a method of displaying an indication of a presence of ice on an aircraft display in an avionics system. The method includes receiving radar reflectivity data and temperature data and determining a presence of at least one convective cell, and providing the indication at least in part in response to a wind parameter and a size of the convective cell.


Another embodiment relates to an aircraft hazard warning system. The aircraft hazard warning system includes a processing system for determining a presence of ice crystals. The processing system receives radar reflectivity data, and temperature data, and determines an ice crystal warning by: 1. determining a size of a convective cell using the radar reflectivity data, and temperature data and determining a blow off area associated with the convective cell in response to the size and a wind direction parameter, the blow off area being an area where ice crystals migrate due to wind; or 2. determining a size of a stratiform region and determining a presence of a convective cell previously in the stratiform region.


Another exemplary embodiment relates to an apparatus for determining a presence of a convective cell in an environment of an aircraft. The apparatus includes an input for radar reflectivity data and temperature data, and a processing system for determining the presence of the convective cell. The processing system receives the radar reflectivity data and the temperature data and determines the presence of the convective cell by determining an amount of liquid water present at altitudes above the freezing point.


Another exemplary embodiment relates to an aircraft warning system that provides a level of an icing condition on a display, the level can be one of two or more icing levels above no icing condition level.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a hazard warning system according to an exemplary embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a functional flow diagram of a process executed in the hazard warning system of FIG. 1 according to an exemplary embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a functional flow diagram of a process executed in the hazard warning system of FIG. 1 according to an exemplary embodiment; and



FIG. 4 is a functional flow diagram of a process executed in the hazard warning system of FIG. 1 according to an exemplary embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Before describing in detail the particular improved system and method, it should be observed that the invention includes, but is not limited to a novel structural combination of conventional data/signal processing components and communications circuits, and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, methods, functions, control and arrangement of conventional components software, and circuits have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block representations and schematic diagrams, in order not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the description herein. Further, the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments depicted in the exemplary diagrams, but should be construed in accordance with the language in the claims.


An aircraft hazard warning system or other avionic system may infer or otherwise detect ice or ice crystals and provide a warning with respect to the geographical location and/or altitude of the ice crystals in one embodiment. The hazard warning system can detect blow off regions above convective regions as regions of inferred ice crystal detection in one embodiment. The hazard warning system can detect ice hazard regions associated with stratiform rain that follows convective cells in another embodiment. The system can combine direct detection of ice particles with inferred detection of ice particles to provide a unified indication of hazard. Alternatively, inferred detection of ice particles can use a different indication than direct detection.


The current regulatory environment as defined by governmental regulatory agencies supports display of basic radar sensor information as red, yellow, and green for radar reflectivity calibrated to rainfall rate and magenta as turbulence. The regulatory agencies do not currently provide guidance for changing the definition of the radar display based on inferred hazards. The radar display format may be selected to display radar colors consistent with turbulence and rainfall rate as currently defined by regulatory authorities or as defined in the future by such authorities. A hazard assessment indication can be provided in a manner that does not interfere with display of standard weather data. In one embodiment, a speckled yellow region is used for areas where ice is detected (directly or inferred) in a horizontal view and a vertical view on a weather radar display.


Referring to FIG. 1, a weather radar system or hazard warning system 10 includes sensor inputs 12, a processor 14, a display 16, a user input 18, and a memory 20. Hazard warning system 10 may acquire horizontal and/or vertical reflectivity profiles and direct turbulence detection information via sensor inputs 12. Sensor inputs 12 generally include a radar antenna 22, a wind detector 23, a lightning detector 24, and a temperature sensor 26. According to other exemplary embodiments, sensor inputs 12 may include any type of sensor or detector that may provide data related to direct or inferred measurement or detection of weather conditions and/or hazards.


Wind detector 23 can be part of processor 14 or separate from processor 14. Detector 23 provides a wind parameter. The wind parameter can be high altitude wind speed and direction data. The data can be calculated from track angle and heading of the aircraft, or be provided by the flight management system (FMS) or other navigation equipment. The wind parameter data can also be provided by a source remote from the aircraft.


In one embodiment, the hybrid approach of hazard warning system 10 correlates radar reflectivity and lightning data to overcome the shortcomings of the lightning strike inaccuracy. The hybrid approach determines lightning strike position relative to radar reflectivity measurements, with sufficient accuracy, to make a convective assessment on a weather event.


Processor 14 is generally configured to process data received from sensor inputs 12 to determine a hazard threat level, receive input from user input 18, and provide hazard indication on display 16. Processor 14 includes ice detector 28, convective cell detector 29, and cell tracker 30. Processor 14 can generate a velocity parameter 32 or other Doppler data, a spectral width parameter 34, a reflectivity parameter 36, and a range parameter 38 based on return data from sensor inputs 12, data or commands from user input 18, or data or instructions from memory 20. According to various exemplary embodiments, processor 14 can be any hardware and/or software processor or processing architecture capable of executing instructions and operating on data related to hazard detection. According to various exemplary embodiments, memory 20 can be any volatile or non-volatile memory capable of storing data and/or instructions related to hazard warning system 10.


Ice detector 28 is configured to provide inferred detection of regions of based upon the strength of a convective cell ice in one embodiment. In one embodiment, convective cell detector 29 uses vertical sweeps on weather cells to assess the vertical extent of moisture with respect to altitude. Air temperature data from sensor 26 (e.g., temperature measurements) can be used to assess air temperature with respect to altitude. Detector 29 can use the combination of reflectivity and temperature to determine the convective strength of the cell.


Temperature data can include a local atmospheric temperature, local temperature variations with time, local temperature variations with altitude, a remotely determined temperature, and/or remotely determined temperature gradients in either range or altitude. Detector 29 can receive data inputs derived from one or more of spectral width parameter 34, reflectivity parameter 36, and/or range parameter 38 to assess and locate convective cells.


Detector 28 can use the assessed convective strength of the cell to determine the updraft potential of the cell and hence, the potential of the cell to loft moisture high into the atmosphere where ice crystals form. Higher indications of reflectivity at higher altitudes and lower temperatures indicates a stronger cell and greater potential for ice formation. A specific reflectivity at an altitude where the temperature is at or below the freezing level may indicate the presence of a convective cell. Accordingly, areas above such cells are indicated as warning areas associated with ice. Weaker or smaller cells have less probability of up drafting moisture that forms ice.


In addition, processor 14 can use a direct measurement of spectral width, for example spectral width parameter 34, from radar antenna 22 to assess the strength of the convective cell. In one embodiment, processor 14 can use a hybrid approach of that correlates radar reflectivity and lightning data from detector 24 to make a convective assessment on a weather event.


The detection of lightning generally indicates the presence of a convective cell and of turbulence within the cell. Detection of a single lightning bolt can infer the presence of a convective cell. The use of lightning history data may provide a more accurate inferred convective cell assessment. If lighting history indicates a high lighting strike rate in a given cell the probability of convection with high magnitude within that cell is high.


Reflectivity parameter 36 can include data related to area reflectivity, gradient reflectivity, magnitude reflectivity, reflectivity shape, and/or a sharp change in reflectivity. Very high gradients (e.g., rapid changes from red to black to yellow) can indicate the presence of a convective cell and thus turbulence. According to one exemplary embodiment, the very high gradient may be a change in cell reflectivity within a few range bins (e.g., one nautical mile). According to another exemplary embodiment, the very high gradient may be a change in cell reflectivity within three nautical miles. In some embodiments, reflectivity information can be used to compute an area and/or volume of reflectivity, and the area and/or volume of reflectivity can be used to determine the convective level associated with the cell. In some embodiments, the volume of reflectivity may be translated into a Vertical Integrated Reflectivity measure. Further information regarding computation of areas and/or volumes of reflectivity can be found in the parent U.S. Patent Application titled “Weather Hazard Threat Level Computation and Display,” U.S. application Ser. No. 13/837,538 filed concurrently with the U.S. application Ser. No. 13/841,893, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


If a cell is detected to be growing at a very high rate, it may be a convective cell containing turbulence. If a cell is detected that has grown at a very high rate in the past, the cell may be convective and contain turbulence. For example, the growth may be detected by a vertical structure analysis. The vertical structure analysis data may include vertical height, vertical growth rate, a vertical history assessment, an assessment of whether the aircraft path will intersect a portion of a weather cell, and/or cell maturity data.


In one embodiment, detector 29 can determine the amount of liquid water at altitudes at temperatures below the freezing point as an indication of a strong convective cell. Amount of liquid can be detected using the reflectivity parameter. In this way, detector 29 can distinguish between non-convective and convective cells because convective cells cause larger amounts of super cooled water to be up drafted above the freezing point altitude.


Convective cell detector 29 can process at least one of parameters 34, 36, 38 and/or data from detector 24 to provide a convective hazard indication on display 16. In addition, detector 29 can cause system 10 to perform further analysis in response to information from lightning detector 24 and/or a parameter 34, 36, 38. The further analysis can even include causing system 10 to perform weather radar queuing and control in elevation and azimuth as well as examining new data or historical data.


After acquiring data from sensor inputs 12, processor 14 may use a variety of processing techniques to assess the ice hazard levels and regions. Processor 14 may identify and track relevant weather cells via cell tracker 30. The cells may be prioritized in terms of their threat to the aircraft and detailed vertical scans can be conducted on high priority targets. Tracker 30 can store a history of cell locations and cell characteristics including but not limited to cell strength, size, vertical height, vertical growth rate, and/or cell maturity data.


Ice detector 28 uses data associated with areas around convective cells and former convective cells to provide warnings related to the potential presence of ice or actual presence of ice. In one embodiment, ice detector 28 can advantageously detect large areas of high altitude ice resulting from convective blow off or from areas of old convection which are difficult to detect using conventional techniques. Ice in these areas is difficult to detect because convective cells are not necessarily located in the regions (e.g., areas of zero convectivity). Generally, it is more difficult to detect ice crystals with conventional techniques when the ice crystals are not being actively formed such as in blow off regions or stratiform rain regions.


Blow off regions are areas of ice presence due to ice crystals being blown from the top of a convective cell by high altitude winds. High altitude ice can also remain above old convective cells (no longer existing cells). A convective cell is an old convective cell if it existed over the region within a predetermined amount of time (e.g., past 5 minutes, past 10 minutes, etc.). Applicants believe that such high altitude ice is generally present over the area associated with old strong convective cells or multiple old convective cells that is occupied by stratiform rain clouds. The larger the stratiform rain area that follows the old convective cell and the more embedded cells of convectivity in the stratiform rain region, the higher the likelihood of presence of ice. Stored history of cell locations and characteristics can be used to identify whether an old convective cell existed in the region and its characteristics while in the region.


With reference to FIG. 2, a method 200 can be performed by system 10 to provide a warning of a presence of ice in the vicinity of an aircraft. At a step 202, convective cell detector 29 can detect one more convective cell by any technique. In one embodiment, convective cells can be identified and located using weather radar data. For example, processor 14 can detect the presence of reflectivity at a certain range (e.g., 100, 80, 40 nautical miles) and perform a vertical sweep to determine a level of conductivity in accordance with the algorithms discussed in the patents and applications incorporated herein by reference. In one embodiment, detector 29 can use vertical structure analysis. In one embodiment, the size and location of the convective cell is obtained.


At a step 204, the convective cell is assessed to determine if the cell has a potential for providing high altitude ice by detector 28. Generally, the larger and stronger the cell, the higher the probability of providing high altitude ice. High altitude ice can be directly sensed using radar returns in one embodiment. If there is a potential for high altitude ice formation, detector 28 determines a size and location of the blow off region at a step 206. If there is no or less potential for high altitude ice formation, processor 14 can return to step 202.


In some embodiments, the radar or avionics equipment may receive uplink or off-aircraft information regarding detected and/or forecast regions with icing or icing potential. The radar may be used to qualify or confirm the assessment by adjusting radar parameters when scanning the detected regions (e.g., gain, etc.), increasing the dwell time in those regions, performing additional scans in those regions, etc. The off-aircraft assessment may be used to increase the confidence in the icing assessment and be used to display an icing hazard warning in that region. In some embodiments, the uplink or remote information (e.g., from ground, other aircraft, satellite, etc.) may include an observation or forecast of one or more of weather information of interest, including icing potential, convective level, size, maturity, reflectivity, winds, temperature, etc. The information can be utilized in performing the icing threat assessment. The icing threat assessment and information originating on the aircraft for the icing assessment may also be down linked or sent to a ground station or off-aircraft system, so that the off-aircraft system can aggregate multiple aircraft observations for the development of a global icing map or global icing forecast that can then be uplinked to other aircraft in the vicinity or using the airspace in the future.


At step 206, detector 28 uses a high altitude wind parameter and the strength of the convective to determine the size and location of the blow off region. The size and location of the blow off region is determined from the wind speed and direction. The size is generally greater if the strength of the convective cell is greater and the wind speed is greater. At a step 210, the blow off region is displayed as a hazard or warning area. The blow off region can be displayed as a speckled yellow or red area, other color region, or with other symbols. After step 210, processor 14 can return to step 202. In some embodiments, an overshooting top may indicate a cell spreading out regardless of wind speed. For example, a cell could spread in all directions even if there is no significant wind or a downwind condition is present.


In some embodiments, the radar response may be received from a multi-frequency radar system, and the radar response from at least two frequencies may be compared to determine the likelihood of ice formation. The difference or ratio between the signals can be used to separate ice detection from traditional rain detection. For example, the larger the response differences from the two frequencies, the greater the likelihood is that the response is from icing.


In some embodiments, the radar response may be received from a polarization diversity radar system, and the radar response from at least two polarization diverse radar signals are compared. The difference or ratio between the signal may be used to separate ice detection from traditional rain detection. For example, the larger the ratio between the horizontal and vertical polarization radar signals, the greater the likelihood that the response is from icing.


In some embodiments, the icing assessment may not be binary (i.e., may not be merely “ice threat” or “no ice threat”). The icing assessment may include a scaled assessment, such that the icing threat potential is identified as one of several levels (e.g., low/medium/high, number on a numerical scale, etc.). In some embodiments, colors, shading, patterns, symbols, icons, etc. used to display the icing threat may be mapped to the different graduated icing levels.


In some embodiments, the icing assessment may be predictive. Weather information associated with a region may indicate an increasing likelihood of icing or may indicate a weather trend that, if it continues, may result in the region experiencing some icing at a future time. In some embodiments, prediction based on regional weather information and/or weather trends may be utilized, alone or in combination with other factors described herein, to provide a predictive icing assessment. In some embodiments, colors, shading, patterns, symbols, icons, etc. may be used to indicate that a displayed threat is related to a predictive icing assessment.


With reference to FIG. 3, a method 300 can be performed by system 10 to provide a warning of a presence of ice in the vicinity of an aircraft. At a step 302, convective cell detector 29 can detect stratiform rain by any technique. In one embodiment, stratiform rain can be located using weather radar data. In one embodiment, detector 29 can determine stratiform rain in response to a reflectivity parameter and a spectral width parameter which indicate the presence of rain without convection. Other techniques for identifying stratiform rain can be utilized.


At a step 304, the area associated with the stratiform rain is analyzed to determine whether a convective cell or front of convective cells existed within a predetermined time. Detector 29 can use cell tracker to determine whether an old convective cell existed in the region of interest. For example, a Midwestern United States squall line can produce convective cells behind the squall line in areas of stratiform rain. A high density of these conductive cell indicates a higher probability of ice regions.


If an old convective cell existed, processor 14 advances to a step 306 and detector 28 determines an ice region based upon the size of the stratiform rain and the number of old convective cells associated with the region. If an old convective cell did not exist, processor 14 returns to step 302. The size of a cell is generally directly proportional to the age/longevity or maturity of the cell.


Generally, the larger the stratiform rain region and the more embedded cells, the larger region of potential ice crystals. Detector 28 can determines a size and location of the ice region using wind data.


At a step 310, the ice region is displayed as a hazard or warning area. The ice region can be displayed as a speckled yellow area, other color region, or with other symbols or icons. After step 310, processor 14 can return to step 302.


With reference to FIG. 4, a method 400 can be performed by system 10 to determine a presence of a convective in the vicinity of an aircraft by detector 29. At a step 402, convective cell detector 29 detects presence of liquid water using weather radar data (e.g., reflectivity parameters). Vertical radar scans can be performed by system 10 to obtain the weather radar data for step 402. At a step 404, detector 29 can determine the amount of water at altitudes above the freezing point using the weather radar data and temperature data. If liquid water is present above the altitude associated with the freezing point, processor 14 advances to a step 406 and detector 289 makes a convective cell assessment. The convective cell assessment can include a vertical structure assessment in one embodiment. Water has a higher reflectivity in liquid form than in ice form. If liquid water is not present above the altitude associated with the freezing point, processor 14 returns to step 402.


According to various exemplary embodiments, methods 200, 300 and 400 of FIGS. 2-4 may be embodied as hardware and/or software. In exemplary embodiments where the processes are embodied as software, the processes may be executed as computer code on any processing or hardware architecture or in any weather radar system such as the WXR-2100 available from Rockwell Collins. Methods 200, 300, and 400 can be performed separately, simultaneously, sequentially or independently with respect to each other.


While the detailed drawings, specific examples, detailed algorithms and particular configurations given describe preferred and exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. The inventions disclosed are not limited to the specific forms shown. For example, the methods may be performed in any of a variety of sequence of steps or according to any of a variety of mathematical formulas. The hardware and software configurations shown and described may differ depending on the chosen performance characteristics and physical characteristics of the weather radar and processing devices. For example, the type of system components and their interconnections may differ. The systems and methods depicted and described are not limited to the precise details and conditions disclosed. The flow charts show preferred exemplary operations only. The specific data types and operations are shown in a non-limiting fashion. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.


Some embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure may include program products comprising machine-readable storage media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable storage media can be any available media which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable storage media can include RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable storage media. Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machine to perform a certain function or group of functions. Machine or computer-readable storage media, as referenced herein, do not include transitory media (i.e., signals in space).

Claims
  • 1. An aircraft hazard warning system, comprising: an electronic processing system configured to determine an icing condition at least in part in response to radar reflectivity data sensed onboard an aircraft, the electronic processing system being configured to cause an electronic display to provide an indication of the icing condition, wherein the electronic processing system is configured to determine a presence of a stratiform rain region and determine a number of old convective core cells in the stratiform rain region, wherein the presence of the stratiform rain region and the number of old convective core cells in the stratiform rain region is used to determine a presence of the icing condition.
  • 2. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein a first level of an icing condition level is provided as a speckled yellow region on the electronic display.
  • 3. The aircraft warning system of claim 2, wherein a second level of the icing condition level is provided as a speckled red region on the electronic display.
  • 4. The aircraft warning system of claim 1, wherein icing condition levels are determined in response to a size of the stratiform rain region determined from the radar reflectivity data and temperature data and the number of old convective core cells in the stratiform rain region.
  • 5. The aircraft warning system of claim 1, wherein icing condition levels are determined in response to a number of embedded convective core cells in the stratiform rain region determined in response to the radar reflectivity data and temperature data.
  • 6. The aircraft warning system of claim 1, wherein a blow off region is detected in response to a wind direction, the blow off region being an indication of the icing condition.
  • 7. The aircraft warning system of claim 1, wherein an icing condition level is determined by determining a presence of a blow off region in response to a size of a convective cell and a wind direction.
  • 8. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 7, wherein the wind direction is provided by a flight management system.
  • 9. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the electronic processing system is part of an avionic weather radar system.
  • 10. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 4, wherein the radar reflectivity data comprises reflectivity data corresponding to at least two frequencies from a multi-frequency radar system, and wherein the electronic processing system is configured to determine an icing condition level based at least in part on a comparison of the reflectivity data corresponding to the at least two frequencies from the multi-frequency radar system.
  • 11. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the electronic processing system receives radar reflectivity data comprises at least two polarization diverse radar signals received from a polarization diversity radar system, and wherein the electronic processing system is configured to determine an icing condition level based at least in part on a comparison of the at least two polarization diverse radar signals.
  • 12. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the electronic processing system is configured to receive data from one or more off-aircraft sources, and wherein the processing system is configured to determine an icing condition level based at least in part on the data received from the one or more off-aircraft sources.
  • 13. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the processing system is configured to transmit an icing condition level to an off-aircraft source.
  • 14. The aircraft hazard warning system of claim 1, wherein the electronic processing system is configured to determine an icing condition level based at least in portion on a convective level of a convective cell based on at least one of an area and a volume of reflectivity.
  • 15. A method of displaying an indication of an icing condition on an aircraft display in an avionics system, the method comprising: receiving radar reflectivity data and temperature data and determining a presence of a stratiform rain region;determining whether the stratiform rain region included old convective cells within a time period; andproviding the indication of the icing condition in response to a presence of the old convective cells in the stratiform rain region.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein a level of the icing condition is determined in response to wind parameter and a size of a convective cell, wherein the wind parameter is a high altitude parameter.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the presence of the convective cells is determined using atmospheric temperature data comprising one or more of: local temperature, local temperature variations with time, local variations with altitude, remotely determined temperature, and remotely determined temperature gradients in either range or altitude.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein vertical structure analysis data is used to determine the presence of the convective cells and comprises one or more of: vertical height, vertical growth rate, vertical history assessment, assessment of whether an aircraft path will intersect a portion of a weather cell, and cell maturity.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, wherein lightning data is used to determine the presence of the convective cells.
  • 20. An aircraft weather radar system, comprising: a radar antenna for receiving radar returns; anda processor configured to identify an icing condition and cause an electronic display to display a region of the icing condition, wherein the processor is configured to determine a size of a stratiform rain region and determine a number of old embedded convective core cells in the stratiform rain region within a time period, wherein the icing condition is detected in response to the number of the old embedded convective core cells in the stratiform rain region.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/841,893, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,244,166, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, which is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/717,052, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,395,438, filed on Dec. 17, 2012, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/075,103, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,902,100, filed on Mar. 7, 2008, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TURBULENCE DETECTION” by Woodell et al., and the present application is also a continuation in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/206,239, 14/207,034, and 14/206,651 all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and assigned to the Assignee of the present application. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/370,085, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,087, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/402,434, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,219, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/256,845, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,902, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/631,253 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,885 are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (256)
Number Name Date Kind
650275 Reeve May 1900 A
3251057 Buehler et al. May 1966 A
3359557 Fow et al. Dec 1967 A
3404396 Buchler et al. Oct 1968 A
3465339 Marner Sep 1969 A
3491358 Hicks Jan 1970 A
3508259 Andrews Apr 1970 A
3540829 Collinson et al. Nov 1970 A
3567915 Altshuler et al. Mar 1971 A
3646555 Atlas Feb 1972 A
3715748 Hicks Feb 1973 A
3764719 Dell Oct 1973 A
3781530 Britland et al. Dec 1973 A
3781878 Kirkpatrick Dec 1973 A
3803609 Lewis et al. Apr 1974 A
3885237 Kirkpatrick May 1975 A
3943511 Evans et al. Mar 1976 A
3964064 Brandao et al. Jun 1976 A
3968490 Gostin Jul 1976 A
4015257 Fetter Mar 1977 A
4043194 Tanner Aug 1977 A
4223309 Payne Sep 1980 A
4283715 Choisnet Aug 1981 A
4283725 Chisholm Aug 1981 A
4318100 Shimizu et al. Mar 1982 A
4346595 Frosch et al. Aug 1982 A
4430654 Kupfer Feb 1984 A
4435707 Clark Mar 1984 A
4459592 Long Jul 1984 A
4533915 Lucchi et al. Aug 1985 A
4555703 Cantrell Nov 1985 A
4600925 Alitz et al. Jul 1986 A
4613938 Hansen et al. Sep 1986 A
4649388 Atlas Mar 1987 A
4658255 Nakamura et al. Apr 1987 A
4684950 Long Aug 1987 A
4742353 D'Addio et al. May 1988 A
4761650 Masuda et al. Aug 1988 A
4835536 Piesinger et al. May 1989 A
RE33152 Atlas Jan 1990 E
4914444 Pifer et al. Apr 1990 A
4928131 Onozawa May 1990 A
4940987 Frederick Jul 1990 A
5028929 Sand Jul 1991 A
5036334 Henderson et al. Jul 1991 A
5049886 Seitz et al. Sep 1991 A
5057820 Markson et al. Oct 1991 A
5077558 Kuntman Dec 1991 A
5105191 Keedy Apr 1992 A
5159407 Churnside et al. Oct 1992 A
5164731 Borden et al. Nov 1992 A
5173704 Buehler et al. Dec 1992 A
5177487 Taylor et al. Jan 1993 A
5198819 Susnjara Mar 1993 A
5202690 Frederick Apr 1993 A
5208600 Rubin May 1993 A
5221924 Wilson, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5262773 Gordon Nov 1993 A
5291208 Young Mar 1994 A
5296865 Lewis Mar 1994 A
5311183 Mathews et al. May 1994 A
5311184 Kuntman May 1994 A
5331330 Susnjara Jul 1994 A
5396220 Markson et al. Mar 1995 A
5402116 Ashley Mar 1995 A
5469168 Anderson Nov 1995 A
5479173 Yoshioka et al. Dec 1995 A
5485157 Long Jan 1996 A
5517193 Allison et al. May 1996 A
5521603 Young May 1996 A
5534868 Gjessing Jul 1996 A
5568151 Merritt Oct 1996 A
5583972 Miller Dec 1996 A
5592171 Jordan Jan 1997 A
5602543 Prata et al. Feb 1997 A
5615118 Frank Mar 1997 A
5648782 Albo et al. Jul 1997 A
5654700 Prata et al. Aug 1997 A
5657009 Gordon Aug 1997 A
5686919 Jordan et al. Nov 1997 A
5726656 Frankot Mar 1998 A
5757322 Ray et al. May 1998 A
5771020 Markson et al. Jun 1998 A
5828332 Frederick Oct 1998 A
5838239 Stern et al. Nov 1998 A
5839080 Muller et al. Nov 1998 A
5907568 Reitan, Jr. May 1999 A
5920276 Frederick Jul 1999 A
5945926 Ammar et al. Aug 1999 A
5973635 Albo Oct 1999 A
6034760 Rees Mar 2000 A
6043756 Bateman et al. Mar 2000 A
6043757 Patrick Mar 2000 A
6081220 Fujisaka et al. Jun 2000 A
6138060 Conner et al. Oct 2000 A
6154151 McElreath et al. Nov 2000 A
6154169 Kuntman Nov 2000 A
6177873 Cragun Jan 2001 B1
6184816 Zheng et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201494 Kronfeld Mar 2001 B1
6208284 Woodell et al. Mar 2001 B1
6236351 Conner et al. May 2001 B1
6240369 Foust May 2001 B1
6246367 Markson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6281832 McElreath Aug 2001 B1
6289277 Feyereisen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297772 Lewis Oct 2001 B1
6340946 Wolfson et al. Jan 2002 B1
6377202 Kropfli Apr 2002 B1
6377207 Solheim et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381538 Robinson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388607 Woodell May 2002 B1
6388608 Woodell et al. May 2002 B1
RE37725 Yamada Jun 2002 E
6405134 Smith et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424288 Woodell Jul 2002 B1
6441773 Kelly et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456226 Zheng et al. Sep 2002 B1
6480142 Rubin Nov 2002 B1
6496252 Whiteley Dec 2002 B1
6501392 Gremmert et al. Dec 2002 B2
6512476 Woodell Jan 2003 B1
6518914 Peterson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6549161 Woodell Apr 2003 B1
6560538 Schwinn et al. May 2003 B2
6563452 Zheng et al. May 2003 B1
6577947 Kronfeld et al. Jun 2003 B1
6590520 Steele et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597305 Szeto et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603425 Woodell Aug 2003 B1
6606564 Schwinn et al. Aug 2003 B2
6614382 Cannaday et al. Sep 2003 B1
6650275 Kelly et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650972 Robinson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667710 Cornell et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670908 Wilson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6677886 Lok Jan 2004 B1
6683609 Thompson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690317 Szeto et al. Feb 2004 B2
6703945 Kuntman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720906 Szeto et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738010 Steele et al. May 2004 B2
6741203 Woodell May 2004 B1
6744382 Lapis et al. Jun 2004 B1
6771207 Lang Aug 2004 B1
6788043 Murphy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791311 Murphy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6828922 Gremmert et al. Dec 2004 B1
6828923 Anderson Dec 2004 B2
6839018 Szeto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850185 Woodell Feb 2005 B1
6856908 Devarasetty et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879280 Bull et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882302 Woodell et al. Apr 2005 B1
6917860 Robinson et al. Jul 2005 B1
6977608 Anderson et al. Dec 2005 B1
7030805 Ormesher et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042387 Ridenour et al. May 2006 B2
7082382 Rose et al. Jul 2006 B1
7109912 Paramore et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109913 Paramore et al. Sep 2006 B1
7116266 Vesel et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129885 Woodell et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132974 Christianson Nov 2006 B1
7139664 Kelly et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145503 Abramovich et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161525 Finley Jan 2007 B1
7200491 Rose et al. Apr 2007 B1
7205928 Sweet Apr 2007 B1
7242343 Woodell Jul 2007 B1
7259714 Cataldo Aug 2007 B1
7292178 Woodell et al. Nov 2007 B1
7307576 Koenigs Dec 2007 B1
7307577 Kronfeld et al. Dec 2007 B1
7307583 Woodell et al. Dec 2007 B1
7307586 Peshlov et al. Dec 2007 B2
7307756 Walmsley Dec 2007 B2
7352317 Finley et al. Apr 2008 B1
7352929 Hagen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365674 Tillotson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7372394 Woodell et al. May 2008 B1
7383131 Wey et al. Jun 2008 B1
7417578 Woodell et al. Aug 2008 B1
7417579 Woodell Aug 2008 B1
7427943 Kronfeld et al. Sep 2008 B1
7471995 Robinson Dec 2008 B1
7486219 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7486220 Kronfeld et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492304 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492305 Woodell et al. Feb 2009 B1
7515087 Woodell et al. Apr 2009 B1
7515088 Woodell Apr 2009 B1
7528613 Thompson et al. May 2009 B1
7541971 Woodell et al. Jun 2009 B1
7557735 Woodell et al. Jul 2009 B1
7576680 Woodell Aug 2009 B1
7581441 Barny et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598901 Tillotson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598902 Woodell et al. Oct 2009 B1
7633428 McCusker Dec 2009 B1
7633431 Wey et al. Dec 2009 B1
7664601 Daly, Jr. Feb 2010 B2
7696921 Finley et al. Apr 2010 B1
7714767 Kronfeld et al. May 2010 B1
7728758 Varadarajan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733264 Woodell et al. Jun 2010 B1
7859448 Woodell et al. Dec 2010 B1
7868811 Woodell et al. Jan 2011 B1
7907342 Simmonds et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917255 Finley Mar 2011 B1
7973698 Woodell et al. Jul 2011 B1
7982658 Kauffman et al. Jul 2011 B2
8022859 Bunch et al. Sep 2011 B2
8054214 Bunch Nov 2011 B2
8072368 Woodell Dec 2011 B1
8081106 Yannone Dec 2011 B2
8089391 Woodell et al. Jan 2012 B1
8098188 Costes et al. Jan 2012 B2
8111186 Bunch et al. Feb 2012 B2
8159369 Koenigs et al. Apr 2012 B1
8217828 Kirk Jul 2012 B2
8228227 Bunch et al. Jul 2012 B2
8314730 Musiak et al. Nov 2012 B1
8601864 Eilts Dec 2013 B1
8902100 Woodell et al. Dec 2014 B1
9019146 Finley et al. Apr 2015 B1
9134418 Kronfeld et al. Sep 2015 B1
20020039072 Gremmert et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030001770 Cornell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025627 Wilson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030117311 Funai Jun 2003 A1
20040239550 Daly, Jr. Dec 2004 A1
20050049789 Kelly et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060036366 Kelly et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070005249 Dupree et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070152867 Randall Jul 2007 A1
20080158049 Southard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090219197 Bunch Sep 2009 A1
20100019938 Bunch Jan 2010 A1
20100042275 Kirk Feb 2010 A1
20100110431 Ray May 2010 A1
20100194628 Christianson et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100201565 Khatwa Aug 2010 A1
20100245164 Kauffman Sep 2010 A1
20100245165 Kauffman Sep 2010 A1
20110148692 Christianson Jun 2011 A1
20110148694 Bunch Jun 2011 A1
20110187588 Khatwa Aug 2011 A1
20120029786 Calandra et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120133551 Pujol et al. May 2012 A1
20120139778 Bunch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130226452 Watts Aug 2013 A1
20130234884 Bunch Sep 2013 A1
20140039734 Ramaiah Feb 2014 A1
20140176362 Sneed Jun 2014 A1
20140362088 Veillette et al. Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1 329 738 Jul 2003 EP
2658617 Aug 1991 FR
WO-9807047 Feb 1998 WO
WO-9822834 May 1998 WO
WO-03005060 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2009137158 Nov 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (93)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, filed Mar. 7, 2008, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769, filed Sep. 27, 2011, Rockwell Collins.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, filed Dec. 17, 2012, Woodell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406, filed Jun. 17, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,844, filed Nov. 21, 2013, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034, filed Mar. 12, 2014, Rockwell Collins, Inc.
3-D Weather Hazard and Avoidance System, Honeywell InteVue Brochure dated Nov. 2008, 4 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Feb. 13, 2013, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Nov. 8, 2010, 3 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 3 pages.
Bovith et al., Detecting Weather Radar Clutter by Information Fusion with Satellite Images and Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output; Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2006, 4 pages.
Burnham et al., Thunderstorm Turbulence and Its Relationship to Weather Radar Echoes, J. Aircraft, Sep.-Oct. 1969, 8 pages.
Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS), www.11.mit.edu/mission/aviation/faawxsystems/ciws.html, 3 pages.
Decision on Appeal for Inter Parties Reexamination Control No. 95/001,860, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 17 pages.
Doviak et al., Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, 1984, 298 pages.
Dupree et al.,FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting in the United States National Airspace, Proceedings from the World Weather Research Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Term Forecasts, Toulouse, France, 2005, 29 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 13 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Apr. 1, 2014, 11 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jan. 22, 2015, 6 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Sep. 16, 2014, 18 pages.
Goodman et al., LISDAD Lightning Observations during the Feb. 22-23, 1998 Central Florida Tornado Outbreak, http:www.srh.noaa.gov/topics/attach/html/ssd98-37.htm, Jun. 1, 1998, 5 pages.
Greene et al., Vertically Integrated Liquid Water—A New Analysis Tool, Monthly Weather Review, Jul. 1972, 5 pages.
Hodanish, Integration of Lightning Detection Systems in a Modernized National Weather Service Office, http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/hoepub.html, retrieved on Aug. 6, 2007, 5 pages.
Honeywell, RDR-4B Forward Looking Windshear Detection/Weather Radar System User's Manual with Radar Operation Guidelines, Jul. 2003.
Keith, Transport Category Airplane Electronic Display Systems, Jul. 16, 1987, 34 pages.
Klingle-Wilson et al., Description of Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) Weather Products, Aug. 1, 2005, 120 pages.
Kuntman et al, Turbulence Detection and Avoidance System, Flight Safety Foundation 53rd International Air Safety Seminar (IASS), Oct. 29, 2000.
Kuntman, Airborne System to Address Leading Cause of Injuries in Non-Fatal Airline Accidents, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000.
Kuntman, Satellite Imagery: Predicting Aviation Weather Hazards, ICAO Journal, Mar. 2000, 4 pps.
Meteorological/KSC/L71557/Lighting Detection and Ranging (LDAR), Jan. 2002, 12 pages.
Nathanson, Fred E., “Radar and Its Composite Environment,” Radar Design Principles, Signal Processing and the Environment, 1969, 5 pages, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York et al.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,235 dated Apr. 23, 2015, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,901 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663 dated May 29, 2013, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Jul. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/238,606 dated Sep. 23, 2013, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Feb. 11, 2015, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/841,893 dated Jun. 22, 2015, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/913,100 dated May 4, 2015, 25 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,406 dated Jul. 14, 2015, 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jul. 28, 2005, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated May 27, 2009, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Dec. 30, 2008, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Nov. 4, 2008, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,102, dated Jan. 20, 2012, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Aug. 4, 2014, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Jan. 8, 2015, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,438 dated Feb. 25, 2015, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Aug. 21, 2007, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jan. 14, 2004, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, dated Jun. 30, 2004, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Dec. 5, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Jul. 28, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, dated Jun. 22, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Aug. 15, 2007, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Dec. 4, 2007, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, dated Oct. 9, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Jul. 17, 2008, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Mar. 29, 2007, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Oct. 26, 2006, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, dated Sep. 20, 2007, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Feb. 26, 2010, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Jul. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Jun. 20, 2012, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,102, dated Sep. 7, 2011, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,663, dated Oct. 22, 2012, 12 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052, dated Aug. 22, 2013, 15 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Apr. 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103 dated Jul. 31, 2013, 8 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,769 dated Apr. 21, 2014, 18 pages.
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Dec. 23, 2013, 7 pages.
Pessi et al., On the Relationship Between Lightning and Convective Rainfall Over the Central Pacific Ocean, date unknown, 9 pages.
RDR-4B Honeywell User Manual for Forward Looking Windshear Detection/Weather Radar System, Rev. 6, Jul. 2003, 106 pps.
Robinson et al., En Route Weather Depiction Benefits of the Nexrad Vertically Integrated Liquid Water Product Utilized by the Corridor Integrated Weather System, 10th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology (ARAM), 2002, 4 pages.
Stormscope Lightning Detection Systems, L3 Avionics Systems, retrieved on Jul. 11, 2011, 6 pages.
TOA Technology, printed from website: http://www.toasystems.com/technology.html on Dec. 29, 2010, 2 pages.
Triangulation, from Wikipedia, printed from website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation on Dec. 29, 2010, 6 pages.
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/717,052 dated Mar. 27, 2014, 6 pages.
Waldvogel et al., The Kinetic Energy of Hailfalls. Part I: Hailstone Spectra, Journal of Applied Meteorology, Apr. 1978, 8 pages.
Wilson et al., The Complementary Use of Titan-Derived Radar and Total Lightning Thunderstorm Cells, paper presented on Oct. 16, 2005, 10 pages.
Zipser et al., The Vertical Profile of Radar Reflectivity and Convective Cells: A Strong Indicator of Storm Intensity and Lightning Probability? America Meteorological Society, 1994, 9 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239 dated Oct. 13, 2016, 17 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651 dated Dec. 8, 2016, 14 pages.
Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034 dated Oct. 13, 2016, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,239 dated Jun. 16, 2016, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/206,651 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,034 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/287,673 dated Nov. 18, 2016, 8 pages.
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13841893 Mar 2013 US
Child 14977084 US
Parent 14206651 Mar 2014 US
Child 13841893 US
Parent 14207034 Mar 2014 US
Child 14206651 US
Parent 14206239 Mar 2014 US
Child 14207034 US