Determining the capacity utilization of parking garages and paid parking facilities is very important for their operators and in terms of traffic control in cities. Sensors that transmit the status of the parking facility to a monitoring location are therefore used in order to monitor parking facilities. The status normally is detected either via passive sensors or by way of emitting sensors, or via a combination of these concepts. With conventional systems, this detection functions only with delineated parking spaces having a defined number of vehicles (normally one vehicle per parking space).
An object of the invention is to recognize, independently of predetermined parking markings, whether space exists for a further vehicle on an area such as a parking bay at the curb or in an open field.
For this purpose, a virtual image of the area of an unmarked parking facility is created in a central monitoring unit that receives information from parking facility sensors.
The system according to the present invention for recognizing the occupancy of unmarked parking facilities is made up of the following components:
sensors that are placed, at a specific distance d from one another, on the area to be detected.
A central monitoring unit is embodied to communicate with the sensors and to evaluate the data conveyed from the sensors. The position of the individual sensors is known to the central monitoring unit, and a virtual image of the monitored areas can thereby be created.
According to the present invention, a system for recognizing an occupancy status of, in particular unmarked, parking facilities is provided, which system encompasses:
The occupancy sensors can be embodied as passive sensors, for example as magnetic sensors or pressure sensors or inertial sensors; or as emitting sensors, in particular as ultrasonic sensors or as radar sensors or as optical sensors. It is likewise conceivable for the occupancy sensors to encompass active and passive sensor components.
The occupancy sensors are preferably recessed into the ground of the area to be detected. Alternatively, the sensors are disposed above the area to be detected, for example as ceiling sensors in a parking garage.
The distance d between two adjacent occupancy sensors is preferably selected as a function of the type of sensor, the distance d preferably being selected in such a way that a vehicle having a minimum length L_min can just be recognized by the system.
The minimum length L_min can be selected as a function of the nature of the area to be detected.
The invention furthermore relates to a method for recognizing an occupancy status of, in particular unmarked, parking facilities, which method encompasses the steps of:
According to a further aspect of the invention a system for managing a parking area is provided, which system encompasses a system for recognizing an occupancy status of the parking area which is embodied as described above, and furthermore encompasses a management unit that is embodied to assign a vacant sub-area to an arriving vehicle as a parking space, the vacant sub-area being assigned in particular as a function of a vehicle length (L).
The system according to the present invention produces, inter alia, the advantages below. Vacant areas can be recognized with no need to mark individual parking spaces. This results in:
As depicted in
Sensors 30 monitor a specific space around them, and can recognize whether an object, such as a car or trailer, is present in their monitored space. That measurement is communicated to a central monitoring unit 50. In the example depicted in
The system architecture is schematically depicted in
The value of distance d between two adjacent sensors 30 is generally dependent on the type of sensor, and must be selected so that a vehicle having a minimum length L_min can be recognized. This is depicted in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 202 788 | Feb 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/051663 | 1/27/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/131624 | 8/25/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4346293 | Fetzer | Aug 1982 | A |
8050963 | Burdick | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8692688 | Tuxen | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20100123602 | Schmid | May 2010 | A1 |
20130099943 | Subramanya | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150124093 | Wang | May 2015 | A1 |
20150222859 | Schweid | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010013878 | Aug 2011 | DE |
0020879 | Jan 1981 | EP |
1628278 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1816623 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2082386 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2009154787 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2016, of the corresponding International Application PCT/EP2016/051663 filed Jan. 27, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180268694 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |