The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for preparing tax returns. In particular, the present invention relates to a computerized system and method for automating the adjustment of a taxpayer's taxable income to identify and accommodate tax savings opportunities.
When submitting tax returns, the IRS and many other taxing authorities allow a taxpayer to apply various adjustments, or subtractions, to the taxpayer's gross income. The applicable adjustments depend upon the taxpayer's filing status and the tax form that the taxpayer files. The applicable amounts are subtracted from the taxpayer's gross income to determine an adjusted gross income (“AGI”). AGI represents the taxpayer's gross income reduced by the applicable adjustments.
For a U.S. taxpayer paying taxes under the U.S. Tax Code, AGI may be reduced by taking various deductions that the IRS allows the taxpayer to subtract from his or her income. A standard dollar amount for each of five filing categories may be applied. A taxpayer has the option of using the preset, standard dollar amount or, if the taxpayer has tax-allowable expenses (such as mortgage interest, charitable contributions, large medical expenses) that are greater than the standard deduction amount, the amount of the expenses. To take advantage of the expenses, a taxpayer uses an IRS Form 1040 and itemizes the deductions on Schedule A. The Schedule A amount is then subtracted from the taxpayer's AGI.
The IRS also permits taxpayers to reduce income by using exemptions. Exemptions are provided for people who depend upon the taxpayer for financial support, such as a spouse, children, in some cases parents, and the taxpayer. The IRS allows the taxpayer to multiply the applicable number of people by a dollar amount (adjusted for inflation annually) and then subtract it from the taxpayer's income.
Finally, the IRS allows taxpayers to reduce their tax liability by applying credits to the amount of taxes owed. Under the U.S. Tax Code, certain taxpayers may be eligible for tax credits related to child care or adoption.
After the deductions and exemptions are applied to the taxpayer's income, the taxpayer's taxable income is determined. This amount is used to determine the taxpayer's tax bill. Tax credits may be applied to the taxpayer's tax liability. Therefore, it is beneficial to taxpayers to take all permissible deductions, exemptions, and credits to reduce their taxable incomes and therefore, their tax liabilities. However, determining which adjustments apply to a taxpayer can be difficult and time consuming. More importantly, in many instances, a taxpayer may further benefit from certain actions that would allow him or her to qualify for additional adjustments to reduce taxable income. Analyzing a taxpayer's situation to determine whether the taxpayer may take certain actions to qualify for additional adjustments requires the ability to examine outcomes or results as the taxpayer's situation is varied.
Current methods of computing a taxpayer's benefits from reduction of AGI are often completed by hand using various IRS tax forms. However, this process of using manual calculations is slow and imprecise. It is often too time-consuming to cover various scenarios. A taxpayer who uses some personal tax preparation software (i.e., software used by a taxpayer who prefers to prepare his or her own tax return) may be able to determine the tax-savings impact of an AGI change on his or her deductions, exemptions, and credits. However, to make this determination, the taxpayer must actually change a specific adjustment amount he or she entered so that the software can recalculate the entire return. Physically changing multiple entries in a tax software program is cumbersome, as the taxpayer must work back and forth among all available adjustments to determine the best possible outcome. Furthermore, it may lead to preparation of an inaccurate tax return if the provisional entries are not returned to the actual amounts applicable to the taxpayer's situation. Finally, neither method allows a professional tax return preparer and a taxpayer client to review together each potential adjustment. Therefore, there is a need for a general-purpose tool that assists multiple taxpayers in capitalizing on valid tax savings opportunities.
The present invention is a computerized system and method for adjusting a taxpayer's taxable income to identify tax savings opportunities. In an example embodiment, the tax savings tool of the present invention is a component of a proprietary tax preparation software system such as H&R Block's tax preparation software. The tool automates the calculations of legal steps that a taxpayer client may take to reduce his or her AGI on a current or a future tax return, which in turn enables the taxpayer client to take advantage of additional adjustments, deductions, exemptions, credits, etc. provided by the U.S. Tax Code. As may be apparent to one of skill in the art, the features and functionality of the present invention may be used with any tax code of any taxing authority that uses gross income adjustments to determine a taxpayer's tax liability.
In an example embodiment of the present invention, the tax savings tool of the present invention uses tax data that has been entered into a tax preparation software system for each individual taxpayer client to determine whether reducing that taxpayer client's AGI affects the level of tax savings for the taxpayer. Because actual tax data is used, specific savings opportunities may be identified for every taxpayer client of the tax preparation firm.
A tax return preparer enters a taxpayer client's tax information into the tax-preparation software system that contains or is in communication with the tax savings component of the present invention. The tax savings component then analyzes the information from the tax preparation software and devises an onscreen report that details steps the taxpayer client could take to reduce AGI on the tax return being prepared, as well as steps the client could take to reduce AGI on the tax return for the following year. The component also generates a printed report of its findings and suggestions. A tax return preparer and taxpayer client may then review the information and discuss the tax savings opportunities that are available to the taxpayer client.
Initially, the tax return preparer may provide the taxpayer client with an introductory statement that explains the reason for addressing the taxpayer's AGI and the advantages related to changing the AGI on the current return. For example, the tax statement may say “when we encourage you to change your adjusted gross income (AGI), we're not telling you not to make as much money but rather suggesting that you consider making more of that money tax-deferred (retirement income, for example, isn't taxed until you withdraw it) or even exempt from tax altogether (qualified amounts pulled from a flexible spending arrangement to pay for medical or childcare expenses are never subject to tax). There are steps you may be able to take on your current return to reduce your AGI, which in turn will reduce your tax and may even qualify you for additional credits or deductions. And there may be even more ways to reduce your AGI on next year's return. Let's take a look at your particular situation.”
Referring to
Phase-out ranges typically differ depending upon a taxpayer's filing status. Also, the tax code may vary the applicable amount each year. For example, a taxpayer's eligibility to contribute to a Roth IRA depends on his or her income. Taxpayers with incomes that fall below the phase-out range may make a full Roth IRA contribution, taxpayers with incomes that fall within the phase-out range may make a limited contribution, and taxpayers with incomes that exceed the phase-out amounts may not make any contributions to a Roth IRA. The Roth IRA income phase-out ranges for 2004 are as shown in Table 1.
Furthermore, as shown in Table 2, Roth IRA annual contribution limits are varied by year as follows.
Within a tax code, phase-out ranges may be applicable to various deductions, exemptions, and credits. Therefore, when identifying all potential tax savings opportunities, it is important to examine a taxpayer's AGI in relation to all applicable phase-out ranges. Phase-out ranges for various items under the U.S. Tax Code are provided in Appendices A and B.
In the next step, the taxpayer's AGI is compared to the phase-out range for the applicable deduction, exemption, or credit 104. If the taxpayer's AGI is below the start or lower limit of the phase-out range, no further action with respect to potential tax savings related to the applicable deduction, exemption, or credit is taken 106. If the taxpayer's AGI is within the range of the phase-out or the taxpayer's AGI is above the end or upper limit of the phase-out range, then explanatory information about the applicable deduction, exemption, or credit is displayed for the taxpayer 108. The tax return preparer and taxpayer may review together an onscreen or printed copy of the explanatory information 110 which identifies for the taxpayer potential tax savings opportunities. A taxpayer request for a printed copy of the explanatory information may be made in step 116. Even if the taxpayer decides not to receive a printed copy of the explanatory information, the taxpayer may still receive a printout comprising a personalized tax advice statement that provides information which may be of interest to the taxpayer (e.g., information about government assistance programs) 118. The process therefore, may produce both a printout of tax saving opportunities 112 (titled “Make Your AGI Work for You”) and personalized tax advice 114 (titled “BA Statement”).
Details regarding calculations performed to compare a taxpayer's AGI to phase-out ranges are shown in Table 3. Potential tax savings are then identified using these calculations.
If (c)>(a) and (c)<(b) (i.e., AGI is within the phase-out range), a phase-out range message is generated. For example, the message may state “one or more of your tax credits or deductions have been limited because of your adjusted gross income (AGI).” Explanatory information may be provided following the message. Also, a future AGI reduction message is generated. The message may state “there are more ways to reduce your AGI for future years.” The message may further include a list of items related to reduction of AGI.
If (e) is a positive figure and (e)<(f) (i.e., the amount is beyond the phase-out range but within maximum excess range), an excess AGI message is generated. The message may state “your adjusted gross income (AGI) is too high to allow you to benefit from one or more credits or deductions.” Explanatory information may be provided following the message. Also, a future AGI reduction message is generated. The message may state “there are more ways to reduce your AGI for future years.” The message may further include a list of items related to reduction of AGI.
If (i) is a positive figure, an AGI reduction message is generated. The message may state “there are several ways to reduce your AGI on your current tax return.” A list of items for which the maximum deduction has not been claimed may be provided.
Depending upon the applicable tax code, various adjustments to the taxpayer's AGI may be applied and evaluated to determine whether the applicable tax code allows the taxpayer to take further actions to reduce his or her taxable income, and therefore, tax liability. Different income levels and/or phase-out limits or ranges as well as applicable tax code deductions, exemptions, and credits may have an impact on a taxpayers taxable income and/or tax liability. A variety of comparisons and calculations may be performed to determine the impact of each applicable adjustment (i.e., deduction, exemption, and credit) on the taxpayer's AGI and tax liability.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The output screen comprises a dynamic table of items for which the taxpayer client's AGI or adjusted AGI is within the phase-out range. The table shows an item description of the applicable deduction or credit 302 and a related maximum tax savings column 304 and minimum tax savings column 308. The midpoint column of tax savings 306 appears for items that have a midpoint cliff (e.g., under the current U.S. Tax Code, the Retirement Savings Contributions credit, commonly known as the Saver's credit). Within each column, the “change” subheading refers to the difference in current AGI and maximum AGI needed to fall within the specific column and the “savings” subheading refers to the amount of deduction or credit received by the suggested change in AGI.
Because Schedule A savings apply differently from the tax savings shown on the sample screen of
Referring to
1. Health Savings Account (HSA) deduction
2. Individual Retirement Account (IRA) deduction
3. SEP/SIMPLE/Qualified Plan deduction
4. Section 179 expense deduction
5. 50% bonus depreciation deduction
6. Tuition & Fees deduction
The table shows an item description 316 of the applicable deduction or credit, the maximum deduction or credit for the item 318 (maximum amount of contribution or expense used to create the deduction or credit), the amount already claimed by the taxpayer 320 as shown on the taxpayer's tax return, and the amount still available to the taxpayer to claim 322 which is the difference between the maximum amount and the amount already claimed. The amounts in the “amount still available” column 322 may be added to determine a “total amount you could still claim” 324. In an example embodiment of the present invention, the calculations take into account the taxpayer's current AGI so as not to over-inflate the amount of the reduction. A “change” option 314 for each item allows the taxpayer to determine the impact on tax savings if the applicable action is taken.
In addition to identifying potential tax savings for the current tax year, the present invention may be used to identify potential tax savings for future tax years. The content of the output screen for
The tax savings tool of the present invention adds precision to the computation of a client's potential AGI if certain allowed modifications to the AGI are made. It also has the advantage of using actual tax return data, as opposed to conjectural information that is often required by personal tax-planning software. Although actual tax return data is used, the tax savings opportunities calculations are separated from the tax return calculations so that data on the tax return is not affected by the tax savings opportunities calculations. Finally, because the tax savings tool is used jointly by a professional tax return preparer and the tax-preparation client, it has the advantages of the precise computations described above and the tax return preparers ability to use his or her familiarity with the taxpayer client's specific situation to make personal recommendations for that particular client.
While example embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, various modifications and combinations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the available deductions, exemptions, and credits available to taxpayers may vary by tax code. Furthermore, the output related to various taxpayer situations and calculations may be provided in different screens and formats and still fall within the scope of the present invention. Modifications, combinations, and equivalents to the system and method of the present invention are intended to be covered and claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5193057 | Longfield | Mar 1993 | A |
6016479 | Taricani, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6064986 | Edelman | May 2000 | A |
6161098 | Wallman | Dec 2000 | A |
6192347 | Graff | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202052 | Miller | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6347304 | Taricani, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6401079 | Kahn et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6571219 | Spivey | May 2003 | B1 |
6604080 | Kern | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6697787 | Miller | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6751596 | Hastings | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7016873 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7043448 | Campbell | May 2006 | B2 |
7107239 | Graff | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7234103 | Regan | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7257553 | Baker | Aug 2007 | B1 |
20010037268 | Miller | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013747 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020046144 | Graff | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020083024 | Myers | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111888 | Stanley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133410 | Hermreck et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143693 | Soestbergen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178039 | Kennedy | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014351 | Neff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036912 | Sobotta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043262 | Takemoto et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055754 | Sullivan | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093320 | Sullivan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097324 | Speckman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144947 | Payne | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030182215 | Ringler et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216995 | DePauw et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040078307 | Carver | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122759 | Spivey | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167798 | Hastings | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181470 | Grounds | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225581 | Wyle et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243428 | Black et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260566 | King | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043998 | Bross et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055290 | Bross et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050131805 | Bross | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137967 | Ryan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050246190 | Sandor et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261995 | Phelan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060085201 | Sultan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060155632 | Cherkas et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184445 | Sandor et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242052 | Long et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070035548 | Jung et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035549 | Jung et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070088581 | Treacy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088582 | Treacy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100707 | Driessen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150387 | Seubert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |