The present invention relates to an apparatus for improving control of emissions from internal combustion engines, in particular improvement in control of NOx, particulate and other emissions in vehicles equipped with turbocharged diesel engines and compressed air injection systems.
In the field of vehicle emissions controls, it is well known that during certain operating states of the engine undesired combustion products such as oxides of nitrogen (“NOx”) may be minimized by introducing a portion of the exhaust gases leaving the engine's combustion chambers back into the engine's intake manifold. The recirculated exhaust gas dilutes the incoming fresh intake air, resulting in a mixture to the engine that provides two primary mechanisms for reducing NOx formation. The first mechanism is the mixture reducing the peak in-cylinder combustion temperatures where the exhaust gas acts as a heat sink. The second mechanism is the dilution of the fresh air stream, displacing some of the oxygen which would have otherwise been drawn into the combustion chamber. The lower oxygen content results in fewer constituent oxygen atoms that feed the creation of NOx and results in an overall reduction of NOx formation.
In conventional internal combustion engines, such as for example the engine 1 shown schematically in
A well known problem with exhaust gas recirculation systems is the tendency for recirculating exhaust gas flow from the exhaust to the intake manifold to decrease or even halt during certain engine operating conditions, i.e., when there exists an unfavorable pressure ratio between the exhaust and the intake lines, or low exhaust mass flow rate conditions are present. For example, in response to a sudden increase in engine torque demand, there may be too little exhaust gas flow available in the exhaust to supply the intake manifold with sufficient recirculated exhaust gas to match the sudden increase in oxygen and fuel being supplied to the engine's cylinders. In such situations, the lack of sufficient recirculated exhaust gas may result in an inability to adequately suppress NO formation during the transient condition, and a corresponding potential to exceed NO emissions requirements.
Previous attempts to improve exhaust gas recirculation flow primarily have concentrated on building backpressure in the downstream exhaust piping, such as by at least partially closing a downstream exhaust brake valve located upstream or downstream of the turbine side of a turbocharger, or by using a costly variable geometry turbocharger whose vanes may be adjusted to reduce flow through the turbocharger and thus build backpressure. Such approaches increase the pressure differential across the exhaust gas recirculation line between the exhaust line and the intake manifold. However, even with the assistance of such exhaust line components, adequate exhaust gas recirculation flow to the intake manifold cannot be assured in many transient engine operating conditions which occur on too short a time scale to for prior mechanical devices to adequately respond.
In view of the these and other problems in the prior art, it is an objective of the present invention to provide enhanced exhaust gas recirculation flow in all operating engine conditions, including in particular transient engine operating conditions.
This and other objectives are addressed by a system and method for real-time adjustment of fresh air induction and exhaust gas recirculation with an internal combustion engine equipped with a mechatronic exhaust brake (“MEB”), an air injection system (commonly referred to as pneumatic boost system, “PBS”) and a high speed controller which receives inputs from various sensors and/or CANbus signals, and outputs control signal for real-time coordination of MEB and PBS operations.
A mechatronic exhaust brake is an electronically actuated valve used to vary the position of a throttle flap in the exhaust line of an engine. The variable position control of the MEB flap provides the ability to vary the back pressure characteristics of the exhaust stream of an engine. The MEB in particular is a rapidly responding electro-mechanical device, including a fast-response torque motor is coupled with a controller which monitors a vehicle controller area network (“CAN”) for signals used to determine the vehicle's operating conditions.
A PBS system provides the capability of significantly enhancing the torque response of an internal combustion engine, particularly in response to an increase in torque demand at a time when the engine is operating at low speed and/or light load. In such conditions, there is a notable lag between the time the increase torque demand is made and the engine's turbocharger develops sufficient pressurized air in the fresh air intake to produce increased torque output. This is primarily due to the turbocharger being driven by exhaust gas flow, and there being a delay between the start of the increased torque demand and the build-up of a sufficient volume of exhaust gas flow to increase the rotational speed of the turbocharger (and thereby increase the fresh air intake pressure).
During transient conditions, injecting compressed air into an engine equipped with a PBS system produces a near-instantaneous increase in torque output from the engine, providing improved vehicle drivability, potential fuel savings and several other benefits. A problem with the near-instantaneous nature of PBS compressed air injection, however, is the potential a negative effect on NO emissions which primarily results from an unfavorable pressure difference across the exhaust line and the intake line. This is because the mass flow of the compressed air in a PBS event is very high, and it may take several combustion cycles before the exhaust gas flow from the engine builds up in the exhaust line. During this initial period the sudden high air pressure in the intake manifold from the PBS injection may slow or halt exhaust gas recirculation flow needed to reduce NO levels during combustion, at least until the resulting increase in exhaust gas mass flow is capable of overcoming the unfavorable pressure difference between the exhaust and the intake. The result of insufficient EGR flow during this initial period may be large increases in NOx formation due to lack of sufficient combustion temperature suppression by an appropriate amount of recirculated exhaust gas and increased oxygen received in the cylinder due to lack of displacement of intake air by the recirculated exhaust gas.
In the present invention, the MEB and PBS systems are provided and coordinated, preferably using a CAN bus communications network to provide favorable exhaust gas recirculation pressure conditions to maintain sufficient EGR gas flow into the intake of the engine to avoid excess NO emissions. For example, in a situation in which the PBS system determines that a compressed air injection is needed and that conditions are appropriate for such an injection, the PBS may delay initiation of the compressed air injection operation by a minimum wait time, while communicating via the CAN bus to command the MEB to move to and/or maintain a partially closed position for the duration of the wait time. The restriction provided by the MEB operation provides an increase in exhaust back pressure which assists in increasing EGR gas flow from the exhaust line to the intake line, with the timing being adapted to provide for the increased EGR gas flow to reach the intake line at approximately the moment the delayed compressed air injection is initiated. As the PBS system begins the compressed air injection, the MEB is then opened to reduce the amount of restriction (e.g., to a second partially-closed position which is more open than the first partially closed position). This partial opening of the MEB throttle flap is intended to provide an appropriate back pressure for the increase in exhaust gas flow which results immediately upon the injection of compressed air from the PBS system into the engine's cylinders. Preferably, the rate by which the MEB is moved from the first partially opened position to the second partially opened position may be varied (for example, based on changing engine conditions) to more closely match the desired EGR flow from the exhaust line to the intake line to the actual requirements of the engine. As the PBS completes the compressed air injection event, the MEB may be moved back to a more fully opened position commensurate with the engine's current operating state. The amount of MEB throttle flap opening may also be controlled based on other parameters, such as control to maintain a desired differential pressure or differential pressure profile across the EGR line between the exhaust and intake lines.
Alternatively, rather than separate control electronics for the PBS and MEB systems, the functions of these control systems may be integrated into a single module.
The present invention thus provides a highly rapid and responsive interactive system for controlling exhaust back pressure in coordination with compressed air injection events to more precisely maintain accurate control of NO emissions by providing a favorable pressure difference across an exhaust gas recirculation system during virtually any engine operating condition. Moreover, because the use of a PBS system may reduce the length of a transient event (for example, by increasing engine torque output enough that the engine reaches a more efficient operating point and the vehicle reaches a desired speed more quickly), the total NOx emissions potentially produced during a given drive cycle may be smaller than that of a non-PBS-, non-MEB-equipped engine.
Further synergistic benefits may also be obtained with the present invention. For example, the emissions control accuracy provided by the coordinated system provides the ability to design a vehicle powertrain which, as a result of the superior emissions performance, may dispense with undesirable costly and maintenance-intensive exhaust gas after-treatment equipment and related control systems. This in turn offers further savings in vehicle weight and enhanced fuel efficiency. For example, the present invention may enable a vehicle to provide emissions performance to meet increasingly stringent government emissions requirements at levels as low as 0.2 g/bhp*hr without the need to include selective catalytic reduction (“SCR”) equipment on the vehicle. The invention may also eliminate any need to resort to costly variable-geometry turbochargers.
The control of the MEB throttle flap, including flap position, opening timing and ramp rate (i.e., the rate at which the flap is moved, either linear or higher-order curve) need not be directly from the PBS system. For example, in an alternative embodiment of the present invention the MEB control may be based on the engine ECU using inputs such as accelerator pedal position or torque requests to initiate operation. This approach has an advantage of direct connectivity to the engine.
It should be understood that the coordinated timing of build-up of exhaust back pressure of the present invention does not require a particular form of MEB valve, and may be implemented with a sufficiently responsive exhaust valve or similar back pressure device controlled in response to a preset or lookup-table-governed position(s) based on initial operating parameters.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the system may provide for response to engine transients which may generate an unfavorable exhaust line-to-intake line pressure difference by activating the exhaust back pressure control device quickly enough to maintain EGR flow, independent of whether a PBS compressed air injection event is initiated or whether the vehicle is equipped with a PBS system. Thus, the present invention's improved emissions performance may permit development of emissions-compliant engines for markets in which only PBS=equipped engines were believed to be suitable.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Extending between the exhaust line 108 and the intake line 106 is an exhaust gas recirculation path 110. The exhaust gas recirculation path includes an EGR throttle valve 112 which may be set to control the rate of EGR flow from the exhaust line 108 to the intake line 106. The exhaust gas recirculation path 110 also includes an EGR heat exchanger 114 provided to cool the recirculating exhaust gas, A back-flow-prevention check valve 116 may also be provided. The exhaust gas recirculation path 110 conveys recirculating exhaust gases to the intake line 106 via an EGR injection point 118, in this embodiment a venturi arrangement which employs acceleration of the fresh air intake flow to assist in extracting exhaust gas from the recirculation path 110. Preferably, the EGR injection point 118 is in the form of a venturi configured to make use of the Coand{hacek over (a)} effect to enhance the exhaust gas flow, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______.
The exhaust line 108 also includes the exhaust gas-driven turbines of a first stage turbocharger 120 and a second stage turbocharger 122. The turbines drive corresponding compressor wheels 124, 126 to sequentially increase the pressure and mass flow rate of the fresh air being delivered via intake line 106 from intake air filter 127 to the engine 100. Between the turbocharger compressor stages is a first fresh air heat exchanger 128 which removes heat from the air compressed by the first compressor wheel 124. A second fresh air heat exchanger 130 (also known as a “charge air cooler)” is located downstream of the second compressor wheel 126 to further remove heat from the air compressed by turbochargers.
The exhaust line 108 further includes an MEB 134 downstream of the first turbine 120. The electronics of MEB 134 communicate with other electronics of the vehicle via a CAN bus network. Because CAN bus technology is well known, the details of the CAN bus connections are not further illustrated. After passing through the MEB 134, the exhaust gases pass through a particulate filter 136 which removes particulate combustion byproduct particles from the exhaust flow, followed by passing through an exhaust stack 138 to reach the atmosphere.
Between the second intake air heat exchanger 130 and the EGR injection point 118 is an intake air throttle valve assembly 140 and a PBS compressed air injection module 142. Alternatively, if the PBS module is capable of handling the throttle valve assembly's functions, the throttle valve assembly 140 may be omitted. In this embodiment the PBS module 142 includes a plurality of rapid-acting solenoid valves 144 which control the flow of compressed air from reservoir 146 into the intake line 106 (the reservoir 146 being supplied with compressed air from compressor 147 and air drier unit 149). The compressed air is injected into intake line 106 downstream from flow control valve 148, which is closed in conjunction with the compressed air injection during a PBS event in order to prevent backflow of compressed air upstream of PBS module 142. The operation of the PBS system is controlled by electronics unit 150, in this embodiment integrated into the PBS module 142 and connected to the vehicle's CAN bus to communicate with other modules, including the control electronics for the MEB 134.
An example operation of the above embodiment is described with the aid of the flow chart shown in
The operating logic shown in
If the system electronics determines that the engine will not be able to meet the present torque demand without the assistance of a PBS injection event (“no”) control shifts to step 304. In step 304 the system electronics determine, based on vehicle sensor and other inputs, whether the prerequisite conditions for executing a PBS injection are met (for example, determining there is sufficient compressed air in the reservoir 146 to conduct the anticipated compressed air injection while maintaining a sufficient reserve of compressed air to operate essential compressed air consumers on the vehicle, such as pneumatic brake actuators). If the PBS injection conditions are not met (“no”) control is returned to the beginning of the program logic. If the PBS injection prerequisite conditions are met (“yes”) control shifts to step 306.
In step 306 the system electronics initiates operation of the mechantronic exhaust brake 134 to position the MEB's throttle flap to a position which results in generation of increased back pressure upstream in the exhaust line 108. The rate at which the throttle flap is moved into the desired position and the target angular position of the flap may be determined from vehicle operating parameters in order to match the pressure back pressure level and the timing of the arrival of the back pressure at the EGR line 110 to achieve a desired exhaust gas recirculation mass flow rate at the intake injection point 118 when PBS compressed air injection is initiated. This tailoring of the position, angular velocity and/or acceleration curve of the MEB throttle flap to the projected PBS flow provides an increase in EGR flow at or near exactly the correct timing to highly accurately matched EGR flow to the increased intake air flow arriving at the engine's cylinders when the PBS injection is initiated. This highly accurate matching helps to maintain a desired minimal level of NOx emissions. The amount of increase in EGR flow may be managed to maintain a desired differential pressure across the EGR line, or by other approaches, such as maintaining a desired differential pressure across the MEB.
The MEB throttle flap's position, angular velocity and/or acceleration curve may be determined by any of the associated system electronics, including at the MEB electronics, at the PBS electronics, or in a combination ECU. The throttle flap's position, angular velocity and/or acceleration curve may be determined by a variety of techniques, including by reference to a look-up table defining flap movement as a function of vehicle operating parameter such as engine rpm, current exhaust gas flow rate in exhaust line 108, differential pressure between the exhaust line 108 and the intake line 106, etc. Alternatively, the throttle flap movement may be determined in accordance with calculations implementing flow control equations in the system logic, either in the MEB electronics or elsewhere, based on vehicle sensor signals and/or vehicle component operating states. During the time the MEB is activated, the position of the MEB's throttle flap may be varied as needed to any intermediate position between fully closed and fully open so as to refine its restriction of exhaust gas flow, and hence the exhaust line backpressure, to provide optimal upstream conditions during a PBS injection event. For example, rather than being held in a fixed partially closed position, the MEB throttle flap may be adaptively opened or closed as necessary to maintain a desired differential pressure across the exhaust gas recirculation path 110 between the exhaust line 108 and the intake line 106. Alternatively, the MEB throttle flap position may be varied to obtain a desired recirculating exhaust gas mass flow rate or to increase or decrease the EGR mass flow rate to match intake operating parameters.
Immediately following the signaling in step 306 for the MEB 134 to move its throttle flap to increase exhaust line 108 back pressure, in step 308 a timer is started. In step 310 the timer counts until a desired delay period between the operation of the MEB 134 and the initiation of PBS injection pulses. The desired delay period may be fixed, or may be variable to accommodate different vehicle operating states and/or operating conditions. When the timer has reached the end of the programmed time (“yes” in step 310), the control logic advances to step 312. A typical desired delay period may be on the order of 200-400 milliseconds, but also may be very short, for example, 50 milliseconds.
The PBS compressed air injection is commanded to be initiated in step 312 following the delay period. Essentially simultaneously, within the PBS module 142 the PBS electronics 150 commands at least one of the compressed air injection flow control valves 144 to open, while intake line backflow prevention valve 148 is closed to prevent backflow of compressed air upstream toward the turbochargers. The backflow prevention valve 148 typically remains closed at least until the increased exhaust gas flow in exhaust line 108 resulting from the PBS injection accelerates the turbocharger compressor wheels 124, 126 enough to build sufficient pressure in intake line 106 to “take over” supply of fresh air to the engine from the PBS injection system.
Following the initiation of the PBS compressed air injection in step 312, the control logic proceeds along two paths in parallel.
In the path shown on the left side of the lower portion of
Once the conditions for deactivating the PBS system to discontinue compressed air injection have been met, the control logic shifts to step 316, whereby the control electronics command deactivation of the PBS injection. This is followed in step 318 by a determination as to whether the MEB 134 had been deactivated (i.e., the MEB throttle flap has been moved to a position which results in a decrease in throttle flap-generated exhaust backpressure). If the MEB 134 has not been deactivated (“no”) control in this branch repeatedly returns to step 318 until the MEB has been deactivated (“yes”).
In parallel with the PBS injection deactivation steps, in step 315 the system electronics determines whether the conditions for repositioning the MEB 134 have been met, for example, upon the build-up of sufficient exhaust gas flow in exhaust line 108 as a result of the PBS compressed air injection to build sufficient pressure to drive sufficient exhaust gas recirculation flow into the intake without the flow restriction of the MEB throttle flap. If the MEB deactivation conditions have not been met (“no”) the control in this second parallel branch repeatedly returns to step 315 until the termination conditions are met (“yes”).
Once the conditions for MEB deactivation have been met, the control logic shifts to step 317, whereby the control electronics command the MEB throttle flap to move to the next desired position. Next, in step 319 the system electronics check to see whether the PBS injection is still active, i.e., a determination is made as to whether the PBS injection has been deactivated. If the PBS injection system has not been deactivated (“no”), in step 321 the system electronics determines whether the MEB should be reactivated by determining whether, with the PBS injection still ongoing, the conditions for re-activating the MEB are present. If the MEB activation conditions are not present, this branch of the control logic repeatedly returns to step 319 until either the PBS system has been deactivated (“yes” in step 319) or the conditions for reactivating the MEB have been met (“yes” in step 321). If the conditions for reactivating the MEB are present at step 321, in step 323 the MEB is activated by operating the throttle flap to increase backpressure in the exhaust line 108.
Following reactivation of the MEB the control logic shifts to step 325, wherein the system electronics determines whether the MEB should again be deactivated. If the MEB deactivation conditions do not exist, the control logic (“no”) repeatedly returns to step 325. If the system electronics determine the MEB deactivation conditions do exist, the control logic returns to step 317, whereupon the system electronics again command deactivation of the MEB, and then again assesses whether the PBS injection has been terminated in step 319.
Once both the PBS injection and the MEB have been deactivated (“yes” to either step 318 or step 319), the control logic returns to the beginning of the control algorithm.
Over the course of approximately 250-440 milliseconds between times T4 and T5, the throttle flap reaches the desired degree of restriction (in this embodiment, a degree of opening of approximately 65%), where the flap is held until time T6. In coordination with the termination of PBS injection and at a time at which a favorable EGR pressure differential can be self-maintained, the system electronics at time T6 command the MEB throttle flap to the full open position (step 317), which it reaches at time T7 in approximately 10 milliseconds.
The position of the MEB throttle flap may be controlled in a manner different than above-described pattern of “closed to steep angle and gradually opened. For example, after the initial closure of the valve, subsequent throttle flap opening position commands may either further close the throttle flap, momentarily open the throttle flap a certain amount then move the throttle flap back in the closed position. Other alternative throttle flap movement patterns may include a ramped or stair-stepped movement from an open position toward a closed position to provide a slower back pressure increase rate, a simple “close-then-open” sequence (i.e., a square-wave pattern), or a closure and opening pattern which follows variations in system input parameters to “follow” variable back-pressure demands during transient engine operating conditions. The MEB throttle flap control patterns may also be adapted to individual engine and/or vehicle configurations as needed.
The first of the four graphs in
As noted in the discussion of
Due to the influence of the high pressure compressed air injected by the PBS system, the exhaust gas pressure in exhaust line 108 at the entrance to the EGR passage 110 will immediately begin to rise, potentially resulting in an over-pressure condition unless the MEB throttle flap begins to open to increase the exhaust gas flow rate. As shown in the second graph in
The system electronics at time T6 command the MEB throttle flap to fully re-open, followed very shortly thereafter at time T6a commanding the PBS compressed air injection control valves to close. By this time, the increased exhaust gas flow has caused the turbocharger compressors to increase speed to the point that the turbochargers are supplying sufficient pressure in intake line 106 to sustain the engine's increased output in response to the torque demand, and therefore the pressure in the exhaust line 108 at the inlet to the EGR passage 110 remains relatively stable following the termination of PBS injection.
Alternative embodiments of the present invention may use a variable-geometry turbine on a turbine side of a turbocharger to assist in varying back pressure. Similarly, and exhaust throttling device may be located upstream or downstream of a turbocharger or, in the presence of more than one turbocharger, between turbochargers.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Because such modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.