Patent Grant
12134020
This invention relates to a system and method for improving a player's shooting and includes a detection and measurement system for detecting, measuring or calculating shooting statistics (such as made shots, entry angle and release angle, get-off or release speed, measurements of distance, hold time or release time, degree of arc and the like) and data regarding a player's shooting.
In the past, various devices have been used to throw basketballs at a player so that the player can practice shooting the basketballs from a location and toward a basketball hoop on a basketball backboard. Several devices are offered by the assignee of the present application and marketed under the trademark THE GUN. For example, The Gun 6000 Series available from the assignee hereof provides a player with a high performance ejector that a player and his or her coach can use during shooting practice. Other ball throwing devices are also available, such as the Dr. Dish™ product available from Airborne Athletics, Inc. of Belle Plaine, Minnesota, that are used during basketball practice.
One problem or deficiency of the prior art devices is that while they can be programmed to eject basketballs toward a player at a particular location, they were not capable of challenging the shooter's accuracy by, for example, making the shooter successfully shoot a number of shots, either consecutively or non-consecutively, at one location before the ejector caused balls to be ejected or thrown to the next spot or location. Moreover, the devices fail to simulate a playing environment wherein a player feels pressure or a pressure-simulated is provided.
In shooting systems of the past, a launcher may launch balls to various positions on the basketball floor for shooting by a player. The player would then shoot the balls. In general, there were no means or devices for recording data associated with the shots and passes to the player, such as the distance from the launcher that the player was positioned, the arc of the player's shot after the player received the basketball and whether the player made the shot or missed the shot. There was also no means provided for recording the time it took to launch the ball to the player, a time that it took the player to get the shot off and then the time it took for the shot to travel to the basket, all of which can be important data and statistics for improving the player's shooting.
Moreover, there have been no means or systems or methodologies in the past for providing an automated system for repeating the same shot to the same player, multiple players from the same team or even players from different teams and then comparing the shooting data and statistics for the players.
The basketball practice systems of the prior art also lack the ability to track, measure or record the shooting distance and/or a shooting location (such as a shooting location along a vector associated with a basketball hoop) and, therefore, are incapable of providing comparable measurements or statistics for comparison.
There is, therefore, a need for a system and method for not only improving the player's efficiency in shooting the basketball, but also for providing a system and method for repeatedly launching the same shot to the same or different players so that data and statistics, such as data and statistics relative to the shots that the player made, misses and the like, and to provide the player, coaches and other interested persons the ability to compare statistics by the same player, by different players on the same team or by different players from different teams.
One object of an embodiment is to provide a system and process for improving a player's shooting ability.
Another object is to provide a system and method for challenging a shooter.
Still another object is to provide a system and method for monitoring a player's shooting performance, such as shots made in a row and/or total cumulative shots made.
Another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for determining when a basketball that has been shot by a player has been made or has been missed.
Another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for comparing statistics regarding shots by a player.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for gathering data and statistics regarding shots from different players on the same team, the same player, or different players from different teams.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for comparing data generated by at least one or a plurality of players, regardless of whether those players are on the same or different teams and/or providing means for accessing that comparison data over the internet.
Still another object of the invention is to provide means for downloading, exporting, saving (on a permanent or portable storage device, such as a USB drive) the data and statistics, including the comparison data and statistics, for at least one or a plurality of players.
Still another object is to provide a radar or a Doppler measurement system to measure or capture a distance or location from a basketball hoop or launcher that a player caught the ball from.
Still another object is to provide a detection or measurement system that measures not only the distance the ball was caught from that is also adapted to measure, detect or calculate at least one or a plurality of a release time of the ball, an arc of the shot, a release angle, an entry angle or a horizontal or vertical velocity of the ball.
A system for facilitating access to shooting statistics data for a basketball player may include a ball ejector configured to launch basketballs toward each of a plurality of pass receipt locations located at a basketball playing surface, a user interface configured to receive a user selection of a subset of said plurality of pass receipt locations for said ball ejector to pass said basketballs to as part of a basketball practice drill for said basketball player and identifying information for said basketball player, a detector configured to detect made basketball goals, a control system configured to receive data from said user interface indicating said user selection and command said ball ejector to launch at least one basketball towards each of said plurality of pass receipt locations in said subset for said basketball player to catch and shoot towards a basketball goal, and a remote server configured to, for said basketball practice drill and based on data from said detector, electronically store data indicating said basketball player's success in making basketball goals in association with data indicating said plurality of pass receipt locations in said subset, wherein said data is electronically stored in association with data indicating said identifying information for said basketball player.
The identifying information for said basketball player may comprise name and team information. The data stored at said remote server may comprise names, team information, and data indicating success in making basketball goals in association with various ones of said plurality of pass receipt locations for a number of additional basketball players of a number of teams. The remote server may be configured to host a website for displaying said electronically stored data. The remote server may be configured to make said electronically stored data available on an application installed on a smartphone.
A second portable basketball launching machine may be provided, where the ball ejector, said user interface, and said control system form part of a portable basketball launching machine. A wireless communication device may be configured to facilitate electronic communication between at least said control system and said remote server. A structural assembly may connect said ball ejector, said user interface, said control system, and said wireless communication device. Wheels may be attached to said structural assembly for moving said structural assembly about the basketball playing surface. A collection net assembly may be connected to said structural assembly and configured for catching at least some of said basketballs shot towards said basketball goal and return of captured ones of said basketballs to said ball ejector.
The user interface may comprise a number of selectable locations arranged about a rendering of a three-point arc to visually correspond with each of said plurality of pass receipt locations on a one-to-one basis. The remote server may be configured to generate a website displaying a second rendering of said three-point arc and visually display numbers or percentages of made goals at said second rendering at locations visually corresponding to associated ones of said plurality of pass receipt locations in said subset. The remote server may be configured to generate, at said website, summary information regarding said made goals.
The user interface may include an input area for selecting pre-programmed drills. The control system may be configured to command said ball ejector to pass said basketballs in accordance with one of said pre-programmed drills upon selection of said input area. The data stored at said remote server may include historical data regarding said basketball player's success in making basketball goals from various ones of said plurality of pass receipt locations stored in association with said identifying information for said basketball player. The server may be configured to make said historical data available for display to a remote user.
Alternatively, or additionally, a system for facilitating access to shooting statistics data for a number of basketball players may comprise a number of portable basketball launching machines, each comprising a ball ejector configured to launch basketballs toward each of a plurality of pass receipt locations located at a basketball playing surface, a user interface configured to receive a user selection of a subset of said plurality of pass receipt locations for said ball ejector to pass said basketballs to for a respective one of said basketball players, name information for said respective one of said basketball players, and team information for said respective one of said basketball players, a detector configured to detect made basketball goals, a control system configured to receive data from said user interface indicating said user selection and command said ball ejector to launch at least one basketball towards each of said plurality of pass receipt locations in said subset for said respective one of said basketball players to catch and shoot towards a basketball goal, and a wireless communication device. A remote server may be configured to, for each of said basketball passes made with each of said number of portable basketball launching machines, and based on data from said detectors and said user interfaces by way of said wireless communication devices of said number of portable basketball launching machines, electronically store data indicating each respective one of said basketball players' successes in making said basketball goals in association with data indicating each of said plurality of pass receipt location in said subset in association with data indicating said name and team information for said respective one of said basketball players and render said data stored at said remote server accessible to one or more remote user electronic devices.
The remote servers may be in electronic communication with said control system, which may be configured to process said data from said detector prior to transmission to said remote server.
The detectors may comprise a photo sensor.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
shown in
Referring back to
The ejector 20 is a conventional ball ejecting machine and comprises a frame 24 having a plurality of wheels 26. The ejector 20 has a conventional ball ejector 28 that is pivotally mounted on the frame 24 and can throw or eject basketballs 12 in the direction A. The ejector 20 comprises a drive motor and linkage 30 for pivotally driving the ball ejector 28 in the direction of double arrow B in
Note that the ejector 20 also comprises a ball retrieval or net system 34 which facilitates gathering basketballs 12 that are thrown toward the hoop 14 in a manner conventionally known. As also illustrated, the ejector 20 may further comprise a shoot or guide 36 for facilitating guiding basketballs 12 into an inlet 38 where they can be ejected by the ejector 20 through the outlet 39 and toward a basketball player P.
A photo sensor 33 is coupled to the hoop 14 and electronically coupled to the controller 32. The photo sensor 33 senses when the player P has successfully shot the basketball through the hoop 14.
In the embodiment being described several conventional ejectors 20 may be used, including The Gun 6000 Series available from Shoot-a-Way, Inc. of Upper Sandusky, Ohio. An alternative ejector 20 may be the Dr. Dish™ product available from Airborne Athletics, Inc. of Belle Plaine, Minnesota.
In the illustration being described, the controller 32 comprises a plurality of routines or algorithms for improving the player P's shooting efficiency. The routines include a shooter challenge routine 32a for challenging the player P in shooting a basketball 12 towards the at least one or a plurality of different areas 22. The shooter challenge routine 32a facilitates improving a player's efficiency in that they provide a player P with feedback as to his or her shooting accuracy. With the feedback, the player P can focus his or her shooting practice on those areas where the player's efficiency is below a predetermined or preselected efficiency percentage. In the illustration being described, the predetermined efficiency may be any desired or selected shooting efficiency, such as 30% or 40%. For example, if a player's shooting efficiency falls below the predetermined threshold, such as 40% in the illustration being described, the player P may force his or her practice on the areas where the player P needs to improve his or her shooting efficiency.
Referring back to
Referring back to
As further illustrated in
As mentioned earlier, a predetermined or desired efficiency threshold, such as 40% in the illustration being described, may be selected. The player P can use the information fields 50, such as the percentage column 60, and identify those spots where the player P's shooting efficiency dropped below the predetermined or desired efficiency threshold. In the illustration shown in
In the illustration being described, the shooter challenge routines 32a are programs stored in a read only memory (not shown) on the board (not shown) and under control of the controller 32.
Before beginning the shooter challenge routines 32a, the player P or the coach uses the interface 40 to program the controller 32. In this illustration, the controller 32 is programmed in multiple steps. First, the user selects one or more of the plurality of different locations 22 (0-16, in the illustration being described; the one or more selected locations sometimes referred to as a subset) during a first step or does not select a location thus the ejector will throw to the direction it is pointing. Note that the interface 40 may have the steps labeled for easy access. During a second step, the user programs the controller 32 and selects a time delay between passes or the time between which the ejector 20 ejects basketballs 12. In one embodiment, the time delay is predetermined and set to at least one second. The third conventional step is programming the controller 32 with the number of shots for each of the plurality of different locations 22 selected in Step 1. Again, the player P can start the shooting by pressing the start button 70 and can stop shooting by pressing the stop button 72 (
The player P or a coach may select a challenge shooting accuracy button 74 (
A main routine will now be described. If the challenge shooter accuracy button 74 is not pressed and the player P or his or her coach presses the start button 70, the controller 32 begins at block 78 (
If the player P selected challenge shooter accuracy routine in which the player P must make multiple shots in a row at the least one or a plurality of different locations 22 selected by the player P, then the controller 32 begins the routine illustrated in
The photo sensor 33 senses when a basketball 12 passes through the hoop 14 (
Thereafter, the controller 32 determines (block 98) whether or not the total number of spots (TSPOTS) equals one or zero. If the decision at decision block 98 is negative, then the player P has made the number of shots in a row at the location which the player P is shooting the ball, so the controller 32 energizes drive motor and linkage 30 to pivotally drive the ejector 20 so that it will eject basketballs 12 toward the next spot which was selected by the player P in step 1. If the decision at decision block 98 if affirmative then the routine exits to a standby mode as shown.
Another shooter challenge routine 32a (
After the player P has used the system 10, it may output the shooting efficiency statistics to the ticket printer 46 by selecting the print button 114 (
In the illustration being described, the controller 32 may be programmed with one or more player's names, such as the players P on any given team and their information stored in the electronic storage device 44. When a particular player P is using the system 10, he can retrieve his user information using the user button 116 (
During use of the system 10, it may be desirable to provide a display 45 (
In general, the system 10 comprises the user interface 40 that enables the user to select the shooting practice that the user desires. During the first step, the user turns the power to the ejector 20 and the controller 32 on and selects either the pre-programmed drills or the user can select at least one or a plurality of different locations 22 at which the player P will shoot the basketball 12. In the illustration being described, for example, the user would select the various positions by depressing one or more of the buttons 41 (
During the third step, the user uses the button 77 and display 47 to select the number of shots at each of the locations selected during step 1. The user may begin a practice by depressing the start button 70 and may end the practice by depressing the stop button 72.
During this third step, the user may also elect to challenge the shooting accuracy. The shooter challenge routines 32a are stored in the electronic storage device 44. It should be understood that the shooter challenge routines 32a facilitate improving the player P's shooting efficiency by providing a number of shooting challenges to the player P at one or more of the plurality of different locations 22. By challenging the shooter accuracy and then evaluating a shooter's statistics during the challenges, the shooter's performance can be evaluated. If the shooter's shooting efficiency is below a predetermined threshold or is deficient as determined by the player P or his or her coach, then during the player P's next shooting practice the player P can use the information and program the system 10 to throw basketballs 12 at one or more of the plurality of different locations 22 where the player P's performance was deficient, thereby improving the player P's shooting accuracy in general and also improving the player P's accuracy at one or more of the plurality of different locations 22.
Advantageously, this system 10 and method provide means for improving the player P's efficiency at shooting the basketball 12 at one or more of the plurality of different locations 22.
The system and method enables a player to select S number of shots and N number of positions at which the player will shoot at least one basketball.
The system and method further permits repeating the throwing, sensing and causing steps until the player has shot S number of shots at each of N number of position, wherein S is at least one of a total number of shots made at each of N number of positions or a total number of shots made in a row at each of N number of positions.
Referring now to
In another embodiment, the system and methods described herein provides means, procedure and tracking system for calculating, comparing and tracking shooting statistics and data of players from the same team or different teams regardless of whether those players or teams are located at the same shooting location or at different shooting locations and regardless of whether the players or teams are shooting at the same time or at different times. In other words, the system allows, for example, a player, a coach or other interested person on one team of players to view that player's shooting statistics and also to compare those statistics against other shooters' statistics on the same team or comparing that shooter's statistics against statistics of shooters from different teams.
In the examples shown, it is important to note that the players on the different teams could be, for example, in the same league, in different leagues, of the same age group or different age groups or could be different skill levels (e.g., high school vs. college, college vs. pros, high school vs. pros). The comparisons and reports or chart, can be created using various criteria, such as age (e.g., comparison of a player age fifteen to a comparison of shooting statistics from other players of the same age or in the same age group.) It is also envisioned that gender could also be a criterion for comparison so, for example, girls or women could be compared against other girls or women from other teams in the same or different age groups. Moreover, the female shooter statistics could be compared against male shooter statistics.
In
In short, the system and methods described herein permit a player, coach or other interested person or user to compare a shooter's statistics based on a number of selected or predetermined criteria which will be described later herein. For ease of description, the term “user” will be used herein and refers to any interested person, such as a player, trainer, coach, scout, family member or any other interested user.
Referring back to
The system comprises the computer 202 which is coupled to the local server or storage device 44′ which was described earlier herein relative to
In the illustration being described, the first and second systems 200 and 208, respectively, are calibrated as described herein so that shooting positions and statistics gathered from the various shooting positions using the first and second systems 200 and 208 can be compared. For example, a player A using system 200 and shooting at a location, such as at location 8 (
As mentioned, one embodiment includes the Doppler measurement system for generating various data and statistics to be described herein. The general measurements will be described relative to
In
When the running motor is detected, the YES branch is taken, and the logic reaches block 803, which inquires whether a throwing arm TA (
It is pointed out that at least some of the idling in the NO branch occurs during the travel of the throwing arm from its rest position en route to the limit-bumper RB.
When striking of the rubber limit-bumper RB is detected, the YES branch is taken from block 803, and block 804 is reached. Block 804 inquires whether a pulse is detected from the proximity sensor LBS, which indicates that the throwing arm TA has struck the limit-bumper, indicating that the ball 12′ has been launched. If no pulse is detected, the NO branch is taken, and the logic idles in the NO branch until the pulse is detected.
When the pulse is detected, indicating that the arm TA has struck the limit-bumper RB, the YES branch is taken, which leads to block 805 in
Next, block 806 is reached, in which the duration of X number of pulses is measured. This allows computation of the time interval T between adjacent pulses to be measured, which allows determination by microprocessor 910 of the pulse frequency, which is the inverse of T, or 1/T. This is an indicator of the Doppler frequency, although in the digital domain.
Next, the logic reaches block 807 in
If block 808 indicates that amplification must be increased, the YES branch is taken, leading to block 811, where an amplifier gain is increased. The logic returns to block 806.
If, in block 807, the ball velocity is detected as zero, indicating that the player has caught the ball 12′, then the YES branch is taken. Block 809 is reached, wherein the Doppler frequency, mentioned in connection with block 806, is actually computed. Also, a release timer is triggered.
At this time, it is assumed that the player has caught the ball, because the measured velocity of the ball is zero. It is desired to now learn how fast the player can get off a shot, also referred to herein as release time, so a release timer RT is initiated in microprocessor 910 described later herein.
The logic then proceeds to block 810, which asks whether pulses are received which indicate that a Doppler frequency has resumed. To repeat: during the flight of the ball to the player, the Doppler pulses dropped to zero when the player caught the ball 12′. Now, as the player holds the ball 12′ momentarily, block 810 waits for the pulses to resume, indicating that the player has made a shot. The logic idles in the NO branch of block 810 until ball 12′ motion, indicating a shot is detected.
When the pulses are detected, the YES branch is taken from block 810, and block 812 is reached. That block ascertains the count value of the release timer which was initiated in block 809. The count value indicates the time delay between (1) the time when the player caught the ball and (2) the time the player makes a shot.
Next, block 813 is reached, which measures the speed of the shot made by the player in the manner of block 806.
Next, block 815 in
Next, block 816 calculates the release angle, entry angle to the basket, and the arc height, or peak altitude, of the ball.
Next, block 817 displays, or prints, or both, the five indicated parameters which were computed, and stores those values.
Next, block 820 inquires whether the ball throwing motor is active. If not, the NO branch is taken, and the processing ends, as indicated by block 821. If so, the YES branch is taken, and the logic returns to block 803 in
In
In
VGUN is the velocity of the ball, as indicated by equation A2. Equation A3 gives a standard Doppler equation. Equation A4 is a simplification of equation A3, in which the constants F and C have been inserted. It is seen that velocity, in meters per second, equals the measured frequency shift divided by 161.
In
In
In equation B1 in
The vertical velocity in that equation, Vy, is computed in
In
Phrase C1 indicates that the vertical component, Vv, of the ball's velocity is computed. Equation C2 then computes thetae. Thetar is computed in a similar way. Vv (“v” for vertical) is a generalized variable, and a specific instance later will be Vby (“y” for y-axis). Similarly, Vh (“h” for horizontal) in
In
Y=VoyT−½g T2 Equation 1
X=VoxTOR T=X/Vox Equation 2
Equation 1 is the difference between (1) the vertical distance covered because of the initial velocity of the ball, namely, VoyT and (2) the deceleration of the ball due to gravity, namely, ½ g T2. From another point of view, equation 1 is the sum of (1) distance travelled upward at any given time T, plus the superposition of (2) the distance travelled downward at that same time T. Equation 1 gives the y-coordinate of the ball.
Equation 2 gives the x-coordinate of the ball, and is the simple velocity-multiplied-by-time function.
In conjunction with the illustration provided in
Y=(X Voy/Vox)−½g(X2/Vox2) Equation 3
DB=(D Voy/Vox)−½g(D2/Vox2) Equation 3A
Equation 4 is a reduction, in which equation 3A is multiplied by Vox2, and re-arranged, as indicated. Equation 4 allows computation of Voy, which is the vertical component of the ball's velocity.
Voy=(DBVox2+½g D2)/D Vox Equation 4
Vox is the x-component of velocity of the ball, and is measured by the Doppler shift. D is the distance between the player and the basket. The parameter g is the acceleration due to gravity.
DA=Voy2/2g Equation 5
Et=m g DA Equation A
EB=½m VBY2+m g DB Equation B
EquationA=EquationBOR m g DA=½m VBY2+m g DBOR ½VBY2=g DA−g DBVBY=√{square root over (2g(DA−DB))}=8.02√{square root over (DA−DB)} Equation 6
Another embodiment for determination of arch height is shown in
The total energy of the ball (in the y-direction) at the basket equals the potential energy at the peak of the arch, that is, at the height DA. Thus, equation A is set equal to equation B, and solved for VBy, producing equation 6. VBy is the vertical component of velocity at the basket.
Equation 7 then uses Vby and Vox to compute the entry angle of the ball at the basket.
An exemplary calculation using typical values will now be given. The following assumptions are made:
The following calculations are thus made.
The system 200 and Doppler system 800 comprise a Doppler circuit for capturing and/or calculating the various Doppler measurements that will now be described.
Horn 900 in
Horn 900 includes (1) a radar transmitter which transmits bursts of energy at 24 GHZ, (2) a receiver, or detector, which detects reflected radar energy, and (3) a mixer (also called a multiplier or heterodyne circuit) which produces a signal which indicates the difference in frequency, due to Doppler shift, between the transmitted signal and the received signal.
The difference signal, indicated as waveform DS in
A variable gain amplifier 902 amplifies the difference signal DS. Waveform 904 represents the amplified signal. The amplifier is represented as an amplifier 906 symbolically followed by a variable potentiometer 908. The latter operates as a voltage divider and picks off a signal which is a percentage of the output signal produced by the amplifier 906. Thus, as a hypothetical example, if the gain of amplifier 906 is 10, and potentiometer 908 picks off 80 percent of the amplified signal, the net amplification is 8.
The gain of the variable gain amplifier 902 is controlled by microprocessor 910, as indicated by dashed line 912. One reason for using variable gain is that the strength of the reflected signal received by horn 900 will depend on the distance to the object (the basketball 12′ in this context) causing the reflection.
For example, if the object is located ten feet from the horn, the reflected signal received by the horn will have a certain strength. If the object is located twenty feet from the horn, the reflected signal received by the horn will have a smaller strength because the reflected signal travelled a longer distance.
In order to compensate for this reduced signal strength due to distance, the gain of amplifier 902 is adjusted during the flight of the radar pulse. The following simplified Table 1 illustrates some principles involved in this compensation. All units are arbitrary for simplicity.
As Table 1 indicates, the time of flight of the radar pulse (that is, the round-trip time which includes the time of flight to the object, plus the time of flight back to the horn 900) is proportional to the distance to the object. The strength of the received signal is arbitrarily indicated as the sequence 5, 4, 3, 2.
It is pointed out that the flight time of the ball-pass described earlier is not the time of flight in Table 1, but is one-half of the time of flight of Table 1.
The gain of the amplifier 902 is adjusted so that the signal strength produced by the amplifier 906 remains at unity. For example, for the object at 10 distance units, the received signal strength is 5, and the gain is unity.
For the object at 20 distance units, the gain is 5/4, or 1.25. When this gain is applied to the received signal strength of 4, the resulting signal strength is 4× 5/4, or 5, making the received signal strength, after amplification, the same as the signal strength for the object at 10 distance units.
Further, the sequence of operation is significant. Row 1 represents an elapsed time of 1 unit after transmission of a radar burst. The gain is 1 at this time. If a reflected signal is received at this time, it is amplified by this gain.
Row 2 represents an elapsed time of 2 units after transmission of this radar burst. The gain is 5/4 at this time. If a reflected signal is received at this time, it is amplified by this gain.
Row 3 represents an elapsed time of 3 units after transmission of this radar burst. The gain is 5/3 at this time. If a reflected signal is received at this time, it is amplified by this gain, and so on.
Thus, for each radar pulse transmitted, the microprocessor 910 in
In the immediately preceding discussion, a single speed of the ball-pass. However, if a faster pass is made, then, at any given time after launch, the ball will be farther away than the same ball passed at a slower speed.
To repeat: at any given time after launch, such as Y milliseconds, the reflected radar signal from the faster ball, when received, will be smaller than the reflected radar signal from the slower ball, when received. The reason is that, after Y milliseconds, the faster ball is farther away.
Accordingly, Table 1 above can be modified. The progressive reduction of signal strength in the received burst will depend on the distance which the burst traveled (that is, the total distance to the basketball, plus the return distance). That distance will equal (1) the speed of the basketball multiplied by (2) the time of travel of the basketball.
The basketball's speed is known to the microprocessor 910 in
Therefore, the distance to the basketball 12′, in the second column of Table 1, in principle, will be known by multiplying the speed of the basketball 12′ times the time elapsed since the radar pulse was transmitted. A radar pulse will travel twice this distance. The attenuation of the radar signal will depend on this distance.
Consequently, the time elapsed since the launch of the basketball is used to determine the gain of variable gain amplifier 902 in
This can be illustrated by Table 2.
Assume that the speed of the ball 12′ is 20, as indicated. In Row 1, the time of flight represents a trip to the ball, plus the return trip, for a distance of 20. Since the speed is 20, the time of flight is 1, as indicated.
In row 2, the speed is still 20, but the total distance is 40, corresponding to the time shown of 2, and so on.
In another embodiment, the gain selected for each time instant after launch of the basketball 12′ need not be a linear function of time.
Therefore, the distance to the ball 12′ is, in principle, used to adjust the gain of the amplifier 902 in
In one form of one embodiment of the invention, the goal is to maintain the signal received by horn 900 as constant as possible. The gain required at each instant can be determined experimentally in a simple manner, since the distances involved are not large. For example, if the basketball is launched for different distances of 5 feet, then 6 feet, then 7 feet, and then in one foot increments up to 100 feet, and the signal attenuation measured for each launch, that represents 96 launches, which can be done in a short time. The necessary signal gain is immediately apparent for each launch, based on the signal received for each.
After the gain is adjusted in pursuit of maintaining a constant received amplitude, the signal is filtered. In
The output of block 914 is indicated as waveform 916, which represents the extracted difference signal DS.
The output of block 914 is fed to a comparator 918, which compares this output to a threshold voltage THRESH, which is produced by a potentiometer 920. Potentiometer 920 is manually adjustable. The adjustable voltage THRESH determines the trip point of the comparator 918.
Each time the voltage THRESH is exceeded, comparator 918 produces a pulse, thereby producing a pulse train 922 having a frequency identical to that of waveform 916, which frequency is identical to the difference frequency DS. This frequency indicates the speed of the object which reflected the radar pulse produced by horn 900
Microprocessor 910 counts the number of pulses occurring in pulse train 922 per second, and thereby deduces the frequency of the pulse train 922.
Switch 923 is controlled by the microprocessor 910, as indicated by dashed line 925. Switch 923 turns the transmitter within horn 900 on and off periodically.
One reason is that the transmitter utilizes a Gunn diode to generate radar energy. Gunn diodes can draw significant amounts of current, and the current can cause heating of the Gunn diode, which will increase the temperature of the Gunn diode. The increase in temperature can cause a drift in frequency of the Gunn diode.
Therefore, in one form of one embodiment of the invention, the microprocessor 910 turns on the Gunn diode, through switch 923, only just prior to transmission of a radar burst, and shuts down the Gunn diode immediately afterward.
In
In
The symbolic variable gain amplifier 902 of
Digitally variable resistor 908A in
In
Lines 909 represent power lines which receive voltages from sources external to the components of
The microprocessor 910 supplies reference voltages which are used throughout
In
Comparator 922 determines when the output of amplifiers 920 exceed a threshold and, if so, feeds a signal to transistor 924. The signal is indicated by LED 926.
The signal on line 930 is fed to microprocessor 915 in
Terminals 950 also power a DC/DC converter circuit 970, which contains the industry standard LT1931 DC/DC converter 972, which produces negative 8 volts on line 975. Other embodiments of the invention may utilize 12 volts on this line 975, and yet other voltages in other cases.
A significant feature of one form of the invention is that the microprocessor 910 in
That pulse train 922 indicates the Doppler shift of the radar signal, which is Delta-F in equation A3 in
The other external data used is Tp, elapsed time of the player's shot, as in equation B2 in
So long as the user has entered Db (the difference between the height of the ball at the release point and the loft rim), the only external values used by the microprocessor are (1) the Doppler shift and (2) the flight time of the player's shot, Tp.
Another time, Td in equation A1 in
To recapitulate: the Doppler shift, indicated in pulse train 922 in
When the Doppler shift indicates that the ball is again in motion, it is assumed that the player has shot the ball. The Doppler shift is then taken as indicating the horizontal velocity Vh in
The Doppler shift and Tp, the time of flight of the player's shot, are values determined by external events. The flight time of the pass to the player, Ta is computed internally, as the interval between (1) initiation of the launch of the ball, which is under control of the microprocessor 910, and (2) the drop of the Doppler shift to zero, indicating zero speed in the ball. In one embodiment of the Doppler, the signal is continuous. It transmits a continuous 24 GHz signal. The signal it receives back from a moving target is slightly shifted in frequency above or below 24 GHz according to the velocity of the target. When mixed together (transmitted and received signal), a difference signal results. The frequency of this difference signal is proportional to target speed. The difference signal is what is input to the first amplifier stage of the ejector 20′ circuit. So the changes in amplification occur as a function of time from an event, the ejector throwing the ball in the first case, and the player shooting the ball in the second case.
In one embodiment, the ejector 20′ which launches a basketball pass at a time T1, a radar gun which measures speed S of the basketball upon launch and a control which knows time T1, identifies a time T2, when the speed measured by the radar gun falls below a first threshold, detects a time T3, occurring after time T2, when speed measured by the radar gun rises above a second threshold, learns that the basketball scored a goal at time T4 after a shot by the player, computes a pass flight time PFT, based on the equation PFT=T2−T1, computes a distance D based on the equation D=PFT x S, computes a hold time H based on the equation H=T3−T2, and computes a shot flight time SFT based on the equation SFT=T4−T3. In another embodiment, SFT can be computed by dividing the Distance, D (already computed) by the Player's horizontal velocity, Vox. It should be understood that SFT could be measured by the means written if every shot was a make.
Thus, to repeat, the computations of
The use of the measurements and calculations (e.g., in customized comparison reports) is described later herein.
Referring back to
After the data and statistics from one or more players, such as Players A and B, is captured or measured and has have been uploaded to the website WS and its associated server 206, the first and second users can elect to make the data and statistics public so that they can be used by others, elect to keep the data and statistics private for use only by themselves or some combination thereof. The first and second users may also view, save (locally or on a remote server, such as the website WS server, or portable storage device), create and print customized reports, use customized reports regarding a player using the data and statistics. Comparison reports and charts of players' data, statistics and rankings from the same or different teams, the same or different geographic territories or other criteria, such as gender, age or skill level may also be created, viewed, stored, printed and used as described and shown later herein.
Advantageously, therefore, the system according to another embodiment enables a user to improve the player's shooting efficiency by, among other things, comparing shooting statistics and rankings of players, regardless of whether the players are using the same ejector 20′, using different ejectors 20′, shooting at the same or different times, shooting at the same or different geographic locations, or the like.
Referring now to
In order to utilize and compare statistics or data from shooters using multiple ejectors 20′ which are situated at the same or different geographic locations, it is necessary to calibrate each ejector 20′ (block 228), and this procedure is described in more detail relative to
Returning to the overview description in
Referring now to
In response to this input, the website WS generates a message, which is illustrated in
Once an account is created, the user may go to the website WS (block 258 in
In one illustrative embodiment and after registering the ejector 20′, the user is enabled to create rosters and add teams and players, for example, up to twenty-seven players per team, although the number of players could be more or fewer, using the website WS. Each player is assigned a digital or numeric code that they will use to enter each time they use the ejector 20′. Once the roster has been entered by the user on the website WS, the user will be prompted to and may export it (or save it) to a portable storage device 210, such as a USB drive, thumb drive, flash drive or the like. The ejector 20′ comprises a port or interface (not shown) that receives the portable storage device 210 so that the data thereon can be downloaded to the ejector 20′ using the import button 118 mentioned earlier herein relative to
In one illustrative embodiment, two groups or teams of players within, for example, a school or organization can be tracked by one ejector 20′, and the website WS will allow for at least two groups or teams to be tagged to each ejector 20′ that was entered into the area 262 on the website WS associated with the ejector 20′. For example, if a high school boys and girls teams purchased a single ejector 20′ together, the ejector 20′ will track twenty-seven players for the boy's team and twenty-seven players for the girl's team. In this regard, the system 200 contemplates that each of the boys and girls teams has created an account tied to the ejector 20′ serial number and authentication code that was provided as mentioned earlier herein. In one illustrative embodiment, only two individuals, such as coaches, may be registered or associated with one ejector 20′ when accessing the website WS. A third or other user may be associated with the ejector 20′, but only if one of the prior two users has been deleted or disassociated with the ejector 20′ serial number.
In the manner described later herein, once the ejector 20′ is registered using the procedure in
As will be described in more detail later herein, after a shooting session, the statistics and data associated with the team or one or more players may be uploaded to the website WS. In this regard, the portable storage device 210 mentioned earlier herein, such as a USB flash drive, may be inserted into the port, such as a conventional USB port (not shown) on the ejector 20′, and the export button 120 on interface 40 may be actuated so that the shooting statistics and data associated with a shooting session may be downloaded or exported to the portable storage device 210. The portable storage device 210 may then be ported to a storage device or computer, such as computers 202 or 204 (
Having described the procedure for registering the ejector 20′ and provided a general overview of the tracking system and features of the embodiment being described, a more detailed description of various features of embodiments will now be described. As mentioned earlier, it is necessary to create a roster of teams and players on the website WS and that roster of teams and players may then be downloaded to the ejector 20′. Again, after the ejector 20′ is used during a shooting session, the data and statistics may be uploaded to the website WS, for example, using the import button 280 (
As illustrated in
Once the team, gender and team number is assigned by the user, the user actuates (block 294 in
The information is submitted to the website WS by actuating the electronic submit button 316 (
Referring back to
After the roster is created as described relative to
Referring now to
In the illustration using portable storage device 210, the user inserts the device to a port (not shown) on the ejector 20′ and actuates the import button 118 (
After the rosters are downloaded to the ejector 20′, the routine in
The procedure starts at block 350 (
Once the ejector 20′ is calibrated, then shooting data and statistics may be compared with reasonable reliability and relatively low margin of error. As mentioned earlier, the players A and B may be on the same team shooting at the same location, may be on the same team shooting at different locations, may be on the same team shooting at the same time, may be on the same or different teams using the same ejector 20′, on different teams using different ejectors 20′, may be on different teams using different ejectors 20′ at the same or different times, and the like.
Returning to
After the shot selection is determined and the player shoots until the routine ends (
It is then determined whether the user wants to view and/or make local, regional, national or international comparisons of the data or statistics from a shooting session at decision block 368. If the user does not, then the procedure ends, but if the user does wish to view, print and/or make local, regional, national or international comparisons, then the routine proceeds to block 370 (
As referenced in
As shown in block 352 in
If the decision at decision block 374 (
It is important to understand that once the ejector 20′ has been calibrated and the player has logged in, the player may begin a shooting session and shoot until the shooting session ends, as mentioned earlier relative to block 356 in
Referring now to
The routine proceeds to block 382 (
At block 390 in
The routine proceeds to block 392 (
If the decision at decision block 394 is negative, then the routine proceeds to decision block 404 where it is determined whether or not the player wants to continue the current shooting session or workout. If he does, then the routine loops back to block 388 (
Having described the general procedure for one embodiment that is not dependent on the Doppler System 800, now the procedure for selecting a shooting work out and for collecting data and statistics relative to the shooting session that utilizes the Doppler System 800 and its measurement or calculations will now be described relative to
In
The routine proceeds to block 408 (
At block 416 in
After the decision block 420, it is determined whether or not the player wants to continue to work the current shooting session or workout (block 420). If the decision at decision block 420 is negative, then the routine proceeds to decision block 432 where it is determined whether or not the player wants to continue the current shooting session or workout. If he does, then the routing loops back to block 414 (
It is extremely important to note a difference between the procedure described and shown in
Referring back to
If the decision at decision block 424 (
After the decision block 420 (
The user may turn power off by pressing the POWER SWITCH button in
After shooting is complete and the normal data and statistics and Doppler data and statistics are gathered, calculated and stored, for example, by controller 32′ (
In
As illustrated in
A user may also wish to not only store, use and print data on the local computer, such as computers 202 or 204, but may also wish to upload the data and statistics to, for example, a remote site or server, such as server 206 in
In one illustrative embodiment, it is important to note that if the statistics and data are uploaded to the website WS, the system 200 comprises a tracking system that is adapted to enable and permit a collection of measured and comparison statistics and data to be generated, stored, saved, viewed, published and used. For example, regional rankings and comparisons may be performed to rank and compare players who perform during the shooting session to other players in the region. Similar rankings and comparisons could be made on a state-wide basis (e.g., all players within the state of Ohio), a nationwide, basis, or international rankings and comparison comparing all players throughout the United States of America, Italy, China, Japan and the like. The system 200 and method described herein provide means and device for generating and using comparisons that can be adjusted based upon numerous various parameters described later herein, such as a shooting date or date range when a shooting session occurred, age of players, gender of players and the like. As illustrated in block 440 (
The procedure for uploading the shooting sessions to the website WS will now be described relative to
It is important to understand that in one illustrative embodiment, the sessions data and statistics file includes all shooters' dates and statistics and data associated with all shooting sessions they completed since the last export of data, their nametag to the three digit player code described earlier herein, number of makes and total shots in each session they shot each time from each shooting location. If the user wants to export the data without the use of the portable storage device 210, then the user may do so, for example, wirelessly. For example, the user would power up the computer 202 and use a wireless communication device 145′ (
In the illustration shown in
As mentioned, the data is stored in a database 206a (
Advantageously and as described, graphical user interface 451 (
Returning to
As mentioned earlier herein relative to block 234 in
After the player has tracked their shooting data and statistics and the user uploads the “SESSIONS” file containing the data and statistics to the website WS, the user goes to the website WS login graphical user interface 284 (
The routine continues to decision block 454 wherein the user determines whether or not it wants to do a chart type comparing to other shooters. If not, the routine continues to decision block 456 where it is determined whether the chart type for an individual shooter is a progression chart. If it is not, the routine proceeds to block 458 and the user selects chart type; Made/total Shots, Shots, Percentage, Percentile at each Shooting Location and/or Doppler data of statistics.
If the decision at decision block 456 is yes, then the routine proceeds to block 460 whereupon the user selects the date range they would like the chart to include. For example, a beginning date, an ending date or total shots in a career which covers all dates is selected (block 460). After the procedures in block 458 and 460, the routine proceeds to allowing the user to select the rankings/chart at block 468 described later herein.
If the decision at decision block 454 is affirmative, then the user wishes to do comparisons to other shooters and the routine proceeds to block 462 where the user selects the location they would like to include which could be shooters from the local team only, the local county only, the state (e.g., all shooters in the state of Ohio), the country (e.g., all shooters in the U.S.A., France, Italy or China), or shooters from around the world. At block 464, the user selects the minimum and maximum age so that the report includes other shooters in the age range. Alternatively, the user may select all ages so that the report will compare the player, such as player A, to one or more other players of all ages. The routine continues where the user then selects (block 466) the shooting locations they wish to include in the chart or report. In the illustration being described, the shooting locations correspond to the buttons labeled 0-16 in
The routine proceeds to block 468 where the user selects the rankings or chart type so that the chart or report is displayed on a screen, terminal or display, such as a monitor (not shown) coupled to the computer 202 or 204 or other display that the user is using to access the website WS. As mentioned earlier herein, the display may be associated with a computer, such as computers 202, 204, or other smart device, such as an iPad, iPhone, Android, Blackberry or other device that has the capability of allowing a user to access, view and use the website WS. Note that when the user selects which shooting locations they wish to include, they proceed to block 460 where the user selects the date range they would like the chart to include, including the beginning date, ending date or the total shots in a career which covers all dates as explained earlier herein relative to block 460. After block 460, the routine proceeds to block 468 where the user selects “show rankings” chart or report. As mentioned earlier herein relative to blocks 458 and 460, which concerns creating a chart or report when a comparison is not desired, after the user makes the selections referred to in block 458 and 460, the user selects the show rankings/chart at block 468 as shown. It should be understood that the order of selection in blocks 462-466 is not strict, and a user can select criteria in any order as described herein.
After block 468, the routine continues to block 470 where the user views the rankings chart or report and then proceeds to decision block 472 where it is determined whether or not the user wishes to print the chart or report created. If he does, then the chart or report is printed (block 474), and thereafter or if the decision at decision block 472 is negative, then the user determines (block 476) whether or not he desires to email or publish the newly-created chart or ranking. If he does, then the routine proceeds to block 478 or the user is provided with a graphical user interface in which the user can elect to email the chart or report or ranking or otherwise publish it. In this regard, the website WS provides process and means for conventionally publishing the chart or report on website WS or using conventional social media, such as Twitter, Facebook®, YouTube® or the like.
If the decision at decision block 476 is negative or after the publication referred to in block 478, the user determines at decision block 479 (
It should also be noted that the procedure for creating the customized reports on the website WS relative to
After the user selects the chart or report criteria referred to in block 458 and 460 and/or the Doppler data or statistics, then the routine proceeds to block 468 as described earlier herein. Thus, it should be appreciated that reports or charts including the Doppler data and statistics are optional and may be selected by the user when creating the charts or reports for comparison or for an individual player or team of players. As mentioned earlier herein relative to
Advantageously, the system 200 and method described herein provides means, apparatus and methods adapted to enable shooting games and challenges, including the challenges mentioned and described earlier herein, as well as real-time or non real-time challenges between or among players of the same team or players of different teams and regardless of where those players are located or the time when they are shooting or the like. The system 200 and procedures and methods described herein also permit real-time competition and non real-time competitions between players of the same or different teams and regardless of where those players are located. By calibrating the ejector 20′ in the manner described earlier herein and providing the means and apparatus for saving, viewing and printing reports, including comparison reports, the user can compare himself or herself to others.
This procedure starts at block 500 wherein the first player or shooter, such as Player A, logs onto the ejector 20′ using the shooting logon procedure described earlier herein relative to
As mentioned earlier herein, one feature of the embodiment being described is that the shooters can select any arrangement or order of the positions by actuating one or more of the plurality of buttons 41 (
At block 514 in
When the first shooter is done shooting at each of the locations selected at block 508, then the second shooter begins shooting “n” number of balls selected at block 512 at the various shooting locations programmed at block 508. The ejector 20′ again saves this data along with the shots made as sensed by the sensor 33′ and the total number of shots taken at each of the shooting locations programmed at block 508. When the next or other shooters is/are finished, the ejector 20′ begins ejecting balls to the first shooter at the next location that was programmed at block 508. Again, Player A shoots shots at a spot 1, then Player B shoots shots at spot 1, then Player A shoots shots at the next spot, then Player B shoots shots at the next spot and so on.
Note that the ejector 20′ delays the time between each pass at a shooting location in accordance with that which the user programmed at block 510. An additional delay time may also be used as in the first embodiment described earlier herein to delay the time between which the shooter begins shooting basketballs when changing from one location to the next location. For example, an additional delay time of five seconds may be required for a player or the first shooter to move to the next shooting location and the delay time that the user selected at block 510 may not be sufficient to enable the player to get to the next position. Accordingly, the ejector 20′ controller 32′ may comprise an additional pre-programmed delay time for ejecting basketballs 12′ when the location of shooting changes.
The routine continues to block 518 (
The routine proceeds to decision block 522 (
It should be understood that the procedure is not dependent on Doppler statistics or measurements or data provided by the Doppler System 800, but such Doppler data or statistics may also be incorporated into the shooting challenge. The system 200 can detect where ball is being shot from within a certain accuracy and require the second player or shooter, to retake said shot until he takes the shot from “about” (e.g., within a foot in the illustration) of the first shooter's general shot distance. The system 200 notifies shooter of this by flashing timing lights or other notice on Display 45′ (
It should be understood that the procedure described in
The second system 208 having an ejector 20′ launches balls to the same or different positions that were pre-programmed or user-programmed positions for the players on team B (block 532 in
Thus, the system 200 enables the users to compete in real-time or in non real-time because it is capable of collecting and storing data and statistics, including Doppler data, associated with one or more shooting sessions and then accumulating and storing the data over time and storing it on the website WS system and/or server 206. This is particularly useful when using the Doppler data and statistical measurements provided by the Doppler System 800 described earlier herein. In this regard, the Doppler measurements are captured, measured and/or calculated by the microprocessor 910 (
Returning to the illustration in
Thereafter, data and statistics from the one or more players from the subsequent team(s) at the various positions are uploaded and stored on the website WS server 206 (block 546). If the decision at decision block 540 is negative or after the data and statistics are uploaded and stored as described relative to block 546, the system 200 enables users, such as teams, players, coaches and other interested parties, to view and compare player and team statistics of one team, such as team A, against the player and team statistics for another team, such as team B or other teams, as shown at block 548. The shooting challenge is then complete. Reports may be created and printed and the like as described herein.
As mentioned earlier herein relative to
The system 200 also enables the players' statistics and data to be stored in the storage device 44′ (
With the Doppler measurement capability provided by the Doppler System 800, it should be understood that each of the positions 0-16 (
As mentioned earlier herein, the server 206 (
One illustrative report is shown in
The report 600 (
Advantageously, the system 200 provides a convenient and easy means and process for gathering, calculating, displaying, printing or publishing shooting data and statistics regarding a player's shooting ability at one or more of the shooting locations. The Doppler measurements provide accurate shooting measurements and comparisons because the player shooting, for example, along the vector V13 (
Advantageously, the Doppler System 800 provides accurate measurements of the distances where the player(s) shoot the basketball from, and the system 200 collects statistics associated with each of those positions and the controller 32′/microprocessor 910 (
The report 600 in
It should also be understood that the reports for a team may also be generated in the same format or in a different desired format. Also, shooting percentage comparisons may be made, for example, for a region, state, nation or the world and may be created by the user using the website WS. The system, means and process for accomplishing this will now be described.
If the user desires to upload sessions data, it will follow the upload routine described earlier herein relative to
If the “SESSIONS” data includes Doppler measurements or calculations generated by the Doppler System 800, then the “SESSIONS” data file will include additional data as illustrated as shown in the
Advantageously, a user, such as a coach, may note that the release angle, which represents the angle at which the player released the ball 12′ toward the hoop 14′, was 55°, but the entry angle was much shallower in that it was 45°. It may be a coach's desire to improve the player's entry angle to increase the probability that the basketball will approach the hoop 14′ at a desired angle and thereby improve the player's probability of making the shot.
Note that the “SESSIONS” data represented in
As described earlier, once the sessions data is uploaded from the ejector 20′ or a computer, such as computer 202, 204, to the website WS server 206, the information can be used, evaluated, saved, viewed, stored, printed, published and the like. The following are some representative charts or reports that are selectively generated by the system 200 for use by the user.
Once the user accesses the website and selects one or more of the sorting variables to be used in the report, the report accesses the website and is created in the manner described earlier relative to
In the illustration in
The examples illustrated in
It should be appreciated, again, that any number of reports and combinations of reports using one or more of the variables or criteria shown in the preceding and subsequent illustrations can be used. In other words, reports and charts may be created using any number of combinations or permutations of the input criteria or variables described in
Thus, the criteria or variable entries are provided to the user and the user can select the variables to create any type of chart desired based upon the variables selected. For example,
Another example is shown in
Thus, it should be understood that the user can identify and select any combination or permutation of criteria or variables and the computer, such as computer 202, 204 or website WS will generate the corresponding report or chart for display, viewing, saving, printing, exporting, publishing and the like.
In still another example shown in
Advantageously, the system and method, again, permits sorting and comparisons based upon using Doppler measurements and without Doppler measurements and using any number of combinations or permutations of selected criteria or variables. In the illustration being described, several pre-programmed standard reports or chart formats are provided or generated by the website WS. In this regard, the following charts or reports are provided for use by the user:
Again, as mentioned earlier herein, the comparisons can be made on a player basis, on a team basis and such comparisons can be made versus other players on the same or different teams, other geographic regions, such as city, county, state, national, international, age range, date range, gender and the other variables mentioned earlier herein relative to
The system 200 may provide other formats of charts as well.
Thus, in this illustrative chart 772 in
Still another exemplary chart or report 774 is shown in
Advantageously, the system and method described herein enable the user to gather, collect and analyze shooting data and use that shooting data to compare a player or a team's shooting efficiency and ranking versus other players or teams on a local, regional, statewide, national or even international basis. Using the information, a coach can focus the player on practicing shooting on different areas and with different techniques to improve the player's efficiency. The generation of these reports will greatly improve a shooter's efficiency based on two primary, but different reasons. First, the actual data can be studied and a user (both coach and shooter) can find areas that need improvement, whether it be more or less shots at that giving location or if the user is struggling on a certain side of the court, a coach may devise a game plan that would keep the user from shooting from those locations. Secondly, a player or coach will be able to see what others are doing and compare his body of work to theirs. This becomes a competition between users and thus more and more shots are taken and tracked since typically users of this machine are competitive. This collection of data can then be reviewed at a later time by users, including the player P, the coaches who advise the player P or other third parties in order to assess and improve the performance of the player P. In this regard, the collection of data can be made available to select other interested parties, such as players and coaches on other teams of a basketball league with which the player is affiliated, for example. Each individual player or a collection of players on a team or at a given school or club can maintain the website WS on which the statistics and data described above are posted. This posting allows a world-wide comparison of the performances of the players among themselves, their coaches, associates, and rivals. The system 200 also permits competitions among players, teams and the like.
Advantageously, the system and method permit gathering and configuring shooting statistics of the shooter and team across any territory, such as the United States, via the website WS and various graphical user interface showing graphical tables, charts and illustrations (not shown), on the website WS, with the data and statistics being downloadable, printable and/or visible for comparison. For example, the computer 202 (
Comparisons can be done in real-time, thereby allowing a plurality of players at remote locations, for example, to directly compete against each other in real-time if desired. For example, a given pass (in terms of speed, direction, and inclination angle) in
Nevertheless, one embodiment of the invention is not necessarily concerned with precise measurement of these parameters. Rather, one embodiment of the invention is concerned with repeatability of the challenge presented to the player P by each pass. That is, the invention knows the release angle, Or at which the basketball 12′ is launched, together with the compass direction of the launch. In addition, the invention knows the initial speed of the basketball 12′. These three parameters (ball speed, inclination angle, and compass direction) allow a given launch, or pass, to be repeated accurately. Thus, the same pass can be presented to the same player at different times and to different players at the same or different times and/or at the same or different places. The players' responses to the challenges can be measured, in terms of hold times and accuracy of their shots, recorded and then compared as mentioned earlier.
In regard to comparisons, because the players' responses are determined as provided herein, the player(s) responses can be compared in a meaningful way. This is despite the fact that the actual distance from the player P to the ejector 20′ may not be known with high precision.
From another perspective, the flight distance of the pass made by the ejector 20′ can be considered secondary data. The flight distance is computed, based on measured data, but the more relevant information lies in the detailed characteristics of the pass made by the ejector 20′.
One goal or use of another embodiment may be to reproduce a given type of pass, for a given player or for comparison between multiple players. This reproduction can be made by repeating the ejector's 20′ performance, in terms of (1) ball speed, (2) entry angle, (3) release direction, and so on. It is not necessary to work backward from the computed travel distance of a given pass in order to reproduce that pass.
Thus, from this other perspective, the measured information, such as distance of a pass delivered by the ejector 20′, is a useful approximation to the player P from the ejector 20′.
A similar comment applies to the detection of whether a shot scores a goal.
While the system, procedure and methods constitute preferred or illustrative embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise methods, and that changes may be made in either without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/989,408 filed Aug. 10, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/688,354 filed Apr. 16, 2015, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,737,162, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/529,917 filed Jun. 21, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,017,188, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/420,122, filed Apr. 8, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,246. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/688,354 is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/529,903 filed Jun. 21, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,233,292, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/420,122, filed Apr. 8, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,246, all of which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1223386 | Handelan | Apr 1917 | A |
| 2908266 | Cooper | Oct 1959 | A |
| 3776550 | McNabb | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3802703 | Van Tassel | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3878828 | Francesco | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4168695 | Haller et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4262648 | Wegener et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4269163 | Feith | May 1981 | A |
| 4471746 | Ando | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4579340 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4667957 | Joseph | May 1987 | A |
| 4678189 | Koss | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4714248 | Koss | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4717149 | Juhl | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4913431 | Jakobs | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4936577 | Kington et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4940231 | Ehler | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4955605 | Goldfarb | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5016875 | Joseph | May 1991 | A |
| 5125651 | Keeling et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5312099 | Oliver, Sr. | May 1994 | A |
| 5342041 | Aguinek et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5365427 | Soignet et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5393049 | Nelson | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5409211 | Adamek | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5417196 | Morrison et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5540428 | Joseph | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5647747 | Macri et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5676120 | Joseph | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681230 | Krings | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5746668 | Ochs | May 1998 | A |
| 5768151 | Lowy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776018 | Simpson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5813926 | Vance | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5816953 | Cleveland | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5842699 | Mirando et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6224503 | Joseph | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241628 | Jenkins | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6280352 | Coffeen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6389368 | Hampton | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6707487 | Aman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6731316 | Herigstad et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6746397 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6918591 | D'Amico et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7094164 | Marty et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7620466 | Neale et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7766770 | Cucjen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7850552 | Marty et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7854669 | Marty et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7927237 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7938746 | Chipperfield | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8016687 | Martin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8123634 | Lovett | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8147356 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8206246 | Joseph et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8408982 | Marty et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8409024 | Marty et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8540560 | Crowley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8579632 | Crowley | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8617008 | Marty et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8622832 | Marty et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8852030 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9010309 | Lewis | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9017188 | Joseph et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9233292 | Joseph et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9248368 | Stimac | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9724584 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9808696 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 12029960 | Joseph | Jul 2024 | B1 |
| 20020010032 | Stiteler | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20030023145 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073518 | Marty | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20060160639 | Klein | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236993 | Cucjen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070026974 | Marty et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026975 | Marty et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265138 | Ashby | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015061 | Klein | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200287 | Marty et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254866 | Young et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261726 | Chipperfield | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312010 | Marty et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090137347 | Jenkins et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100259412 | Pagonakis | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110294585 | Penna et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120115651 | Chipperfield | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120322587 | Duke | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130095959 | Marty et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130130845 | Marty et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172058 | Marty et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140092253 | Marty et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195019 | Thurman | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140200692 | Thurman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150265897 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150290516 | Joseph et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160166907 | Joseph et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160250540 | Joseph et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160325168 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170232298 | Joseph et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2271414 | Jun 2014 | EP |
| 2026104 | Jan 1995 | RU |
| 9530872 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 9532033 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 2005062841 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2009126982 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Facebook, Shot Chart/App (Year: 2011). |
| Basketball Systems, Skills & Drills, Hoppsplaybook.ca (Year: 2007). |
| Translation for WO2009126982 A2, inventor Thomas Riml (Year: 2009). |
| The Gun 6000 Series, Shoot-A-Way, Inc. Upper Sandusky, Ohio, http://www.shootaway.com/Gun1.htm/, at least as early as Jun. 2000. |
| Dr. Dish™, Airborne Athletics Inc., Belle Plaine, Minnesota, http://www.drdishbasketball.com/, at least as early as Jul. 29, 2003. |
| IMake ™, Airborne Athletics Inc., Belle Plaine, Minnesota, www.imakebasketball.com. (The iMake has a menu drive programming board allowing the user to select a shooting range by selecting a left and a right limit. The user is given the ability to select spots between said shooting range in spaced increments for the machine to fire balls in that direction. ) At least as early as Jun. 2008. |
| Vorelco, The Sniper Basketball Training System, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9SqMy8xdf4, Uploaded on Jul. 5, 2008. |
| Brochure entitled “Sniper: The Ultimate Basketball Trainer.” before Oct. 22, 1995, 5 pages including the cover letter. |
| Dr. Dish Owner's Manual, Airborne Athletics, Inc., 2005. |
| Reich, B. et al., A Spatial Analysis of Basketball Shot Chart Data, The American Statistician, Feb. 2006, vol. 60 No. 1. |
| Sniper, First Advanced Basketball Training Device, 2009. |
| Invalidity charts from ongoing arbitration involving patents issued from application(s) related to the present application. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210283480 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16989408 | Aug 2020 | US |
| Child | 17332055 | US | |
| Parent | 14688354 | Apr 2015 | US |
| Child | 16989408 | US | |
| Parent | 13529917 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Child | 14688354 | US | |
| Parent | 13529903 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Child | 14688354 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12420122 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Child | 13529917 | US | |
| Parent | 12420122 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Child | 13529903 | US |
