The present invention relates generally to air filtration systems having air flow conditioning devices that improve the quality of signal from a mass air flow (MAF) sensor.
Internal combustion engines generally combust a mixture of fuel (e.g., gasoline, diesel, natural gas, etc.) and air. Prior to entering the engine, the air is typically passed through an air filtration system. A mass air flow (MAF) sensor is placed downstream of the air filter (i.e., on the clean side of the air filter media) and provides feedback to an engine control module (ECM). However, the quality of air flow exiting the filter element may be inconsistent resulting in high variation of the signal response of MAF sensor. The inconsistencies in the air flow may be the result of random stream-wise orientations of filter media pleats that result in air flow pointing directly at a MAF sensor window or results in air flow pointing away from a MAF sensor window. The inconsistencies in air flow may be the result of variation of embossment positions on the filter media pleats too. Embossments on media pleats act as spacers between the individual media pleats. Embossments also block air flow coming out from between pleats. Thus, the presence of embossments creates a flow-around-bluff-body situation, where flow structures, such as vortices, eddies, bubbles etc. can be resulted and thus affect MAF sensor signal quality. Moreover, embossments aren't precisely and repetitively positioned on media pleats relative to filter frame (i.e., some of the embossments may be closer to one edge of frame and while some embossments may be further away from other edges of the frame). The variations in embossments consequently introduce variation of flow pattern downstream of the filter media where the MAF sensor is located. The inconsistencies in air flow may also arise from other factors, such as variations of pleat shape or spacing and differing pleat counts. The present application addresses these inconsistencies and therefore improves the signal quality of MAF sensor output.
One embodiment relates to a filter assembly. The filter assembly includes a support frame. The filter assembly further includes a filter media coupled to the support frame, the filter media having a dirty side configured to receive a stream of air and a clean side configured to output a stream of air that has been filtered through the filter media. The filter assembly includes a conditioning device coupled to the support frame, the conditioning device positioned in a downstream direction from the clean side of the filter media with respect to the stream of air, the conditioning device offset from the clean side of the filter media by a separation distance. The conditioning device is a secondary device is placed upstream of a MAF sensor in an air flow duct. In particular embodiments, the conditioning device comprises a mesh screen. In other embodiments, the rectification device comprises a secondary media.
Another embodiment relates to a method of filtering a stream of air. The method includes providing a filter assembly. The filter assembly includes a support frame, a filter media coupled to the support frame, and a conditioning device coupled to the support frame and positioned in a downstream direction from a clean side of the filter media with respect to the stream of air. The conditioning device is offset from the clean side of the filter media by a separation distance. The method further includes providing a mass air flow sensor positioned downstream of the conditioning device with respect to the stream of air. The method includes routing the stream of air through the filter media, and then routing the stream of air through the conditioning device. The method still further includes routing at least a portion of the stream of air past the mass air flow sensor.
These and other features, together with the organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the figures generally, the various embodiments disclosed herein relate to air flow conditioning devices that improve the quality of mass air flow (MAF) sensor signal output in air filtration systems. The conditioning devices improve the accuracy and consistency of MAF sensor output by reducing or eliminating the above-described inconsistencies in air flow downstream of filter media. The MAF sensor may provide an output to an engine control module (ECM) of an internal combustion engine that receives filtered air from the air filtration system. The conditioning device is a secondary device placed downstream of an air filter media and upstream of a MAF sensor in an air flow duct of the air filtration system. The conditioning device reduces defects in the air stream exiting the filter media. The conditioning devices may be a mesh screen, a wire mesh, a foam, a perforated plate, or the like. Such conditioning devices provide an improved MAF sensor signal output in terms of normalized variation, which is defined below by equation 1.
In equation 1, Q is the bench mark flow rate at which the MAF-integrated system is tested, dQ is the maximum deviation of flow rates reported by MAF sensors of a group of MAF-integrated application from bench mark flow rate Q. Better MAF signal performance involves the removal or mitigation of part-to-part variation of the group of MAF-integrated application, by means of a flow conditioning device which is the purpose of current disclosure.
Additionally, since the conditioning devices are intended to be physically added to existing to filter panel frame by either over-mold or other means of manufacturing and is based on existing structure, potential changes and modifications, and thus the cost of them, to existing tooling and design are minimal.
As an air stream passes through a filter media, the air stream is disrupted. The degree of flow disruption is highly dependent on geometry of filter media pleats. This disruption translates any part-to-part variation of geometry of the filter media to any MAF sensors downstream of the filter media, which results in inconsistent and/or inaccurate outputs from the MAF sensors to an ECM or other devices. Adding a flow conditioning device with an appropriate K-factor downstream of the filter media helps to condition the air stream in order to provide a more accurate and more consistent MAF sensor signal outputs. The K-factor of a flow conditioning device is defined by equation 2 below.
In equation 2, Δp is the pressure drop caused by the flow conditioning device, p is the density of the air, and v is the face velocity of the air stream going through the media. If the K-factor is zero, there is no pressure drop across the flow conditioning device, such scenario corresponds to an arrangement where no flow conditioning is used. The minimum K-factor of the conditioning devices is preferably approximately 8. In some arrangements, the minimum K-factor is approximately 1-10. The maximum useful K-factor is estimated to be approximately 100 (beyond which, all allowed Δp of entire filter housing assembly is consumed by the flow conditioning device alone) The K-factor may be affected by the thickness of the conditioning device (e.g., the thickness of a layer of foam), the porosity (ratio of air volume/solid volume within the structure of the device) of the conditioning device, the pore size of the conditioning device if the conditioning device is comprises of foam-like materials, relative opening area of the material if the material is, e.g. perforated plate etc. By a conditioning device having the appropriate K-factor, unexpected disturbances caused by the inconsistencies of the filter media (e.g., caused by orientation effects, deformation from water soak, etc.) are mitigated.
Separation distance between the flow conditioning device and the filter media is another critical parameter, since most of filter media is made of media pleats, which causes inconsistencies in air stream. Adequate separation distance allows the inconsistencies in air stream to be diffused to some extents before air stream enters into the flow conditioning devices The range of such separation distance is approximately 0.1 of a pleat tip gap to 100 times of a pleat tip gap.
Referring to
The mesh 104 is molded into the frame 102 (e.g., over-molded) at a location downstream of the compartment 106. The mesh 104 is offset from the clean side of the filter media by a distance 110. A support frame 112 of the housing 102 may support the mesh 104 and maintain the mesh at the distance 110 from the filter media.
The distance 110 is greater than zero. The distance 110 is on the order of or greater than a pleat-to-pleat distance of the filter media. The distance 110 can start from as small as 0.1 of pleat tip distance up to 100 times of pleat tip distance, as illustrated in
is within the range of ±1.5%. This represents an improvement over arrangements of no mesh 104 and/or arrangements having a separation distance 110 of zero, in which the variance in MAF sensor output is substantially higher. Accordingly, the mesh 104 improves the signal quality of the MAF sensor output (e.g., output signal quality to an ECM).
Various factors impact the K-factor of the mesh 104. K-factor depends on mesh pattern, opening size/shape, thread diameter, etc. If 104 is a perforated plate, K factor depends on again, size/shape of opening, thickness and pattern of openings, etc. The pore pattern of the mesh 104 may be uniform or non-uniform. Specific impacts of different pore size and thread diameter combinations may be tested by a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. The CFD simulation is able to yield streamlines that wrap around a MAF sensor, back tracing those streamlines is able to tell what part of the conditioning device those wrapping-around-MAF streamlines come from, thus determining what part(s) on the filter panel is (are) significant to MAF performance.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In other arrangements, the secondary air flow conditioning device may be a honeycomb structure or a plastic-molded 2D or 3D structure like a forest, or some kinds of 2D/3D fractal structure. For example,
Referring to
As utilized herein, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “substantially,” and similar terms are intended to have a broad meaning in harmony with the common and accepted usage by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter of this disclosure pertains. It should be understood by those of skill in the art who review this disclosure that these terms are intended to allow a description of certain features described and claimed without restricting the scope of these features to the precise numerical ranges provided. Accordingly, these terms should be interpreted as indicating that insubstantial or inconsequential modifications or alterations of the subject matter described and claimed are considered to be within the scope of the invention as recited in the appended claims.
It should be noted that the term “exemplary” as used herein to describe various embodiments is intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, and/or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such term is not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
The terms “coupled,” “connected,” and the like as used herein mean the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two members or the two members and any additional intermediate members being attached to one another.
References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below,” etc.) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other exemplary embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.
It is important to note that the construction and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/980,997, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING MASS AIR FLOW SIGNAL QUALITY,” filed on Apr. 17, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US15/25582 | 4/13/2015 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61980997 | Apr 2014 | US |