Access to renewable energy on the seafloor is limited due to the lack of sunlight, high water flows, thermal gradients, and other traditional avenues of renewable energy extraction. Long term intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems are required to be placed on or under the seafloor to provide information for operational, security, environmental, resource management, communications and other applications. Many of these systems are buried into the seafloor to operate properly or to avoid being fouled by fishing gear and anchors. In addition, these systems often have a short lifetime and need to be repeatedly deployed which leads to extremely high cost of operation.
One such system is a Linear Array BMFC (LA-BMFC), which utilizes the physical structure of an existing buried underwater cable or array to form the sediment fuel cell electrode. Thus rather than engineering and deploying a completely separate energy system to power the seafloor system, the BMFC is built as part of the linear array to form a single integrated unit, and the fuel cell system is deployed with the array just as the array would normally be deployed. In a typical linear array seafloor sensor system, sensors are connected by and separated by lengths of cable that provide power and telemetry for the sensors. The number of sensors and the length of cables vary by application. In the LA-BMFC, these lengths of cable are jacketed with carbon fabric which serve as the anodes for the fuel cell. At various lengths along the cable, small electronics modules connect to cathodes that protrude slightly into the surface water and harvest energy which is then transferred directly onto the linear array power cables. The cathodes for these systems incorporate a buoyant core so that as the system is deployed they stay clear of the seafloor while the remaining portions of the array are fully buried. The approach is applicable to a broad range of configurations and applications.
Advances in BMFC system design have increased feasibility for its use in ocean monitoring, and have been used for powering underwater sensors and communications devices on the seafloor over extended periods of time. However most of these applications have been for demonstration purposes only and integration with operational underwater systems such as a linear array is still an ongoing challenge.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular element, feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in some embodiments”, and “in other embodiments” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or the same set of embodiments.
Some embodiments may be described using the expression “coupled” and “connected” along with their derivatives. For example, some embodiments may be described using the term “coupled” to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. The term “coupled,” however, may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interact with each other. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or.
Additionally, use of the “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the embodiments herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the invention. This detailed description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obviously meant otherwise.
LA-BMFC 100 uses carbon sheathing on carbon cable 110, together with incremental cathodes 130 that protrude slightly into the surface water and electronics modules 140, to harvest sea floor energy and transfer it to power hydrophone elements along LA-BMFC 100. Cathodes 130 incorporate a buoyant core so that as LA-BMFC 100 is deployed, they stay clear of the seafloor while the remaining portions of LA-BMFC 100 are fully buried. LA-BMFC 100 forms a single integrated unit, and the fuel cell system is deployed with the array just as the array would normally be deployed. In a typical linear array seafloor sensor system, sensors are connected by and separated by lengths of cable that provide power and telemetry for the sensors. The number of sensors and the length of the cables vary by application.
LA-BMFC systems can be directly integrated with linear-array sensor systems and seafloor cables requiring no additional engineering or deployment effort. Many of the cables are very long, so there is plenty of electrode surface area to generate energy. The cathodes are buoyant and thus will self-deploy into the water column. The flexibility of the cathodes and lack of loops will prevent fouling by fishing gear or anchors. Finally, the harvested energy can be transferred directly to the power conductors of the linear array sensor system.
BMFCs are constructed of fabric panels or brush-type carbon electrodes because of their durability during deployment. It was previously shown that BMFCs in the same sediments using carbon fabric panels generated power densities of approximately 10-20 mW/m2 in an anode-limited setup. The expected power density was experimentally verified for a 1:8 aspect ratio at surface areas ˜0.01 m2. For linear forms of BMFCs, length is the appropriate scale factor instead of surface area. On a linear basis at a 1:8 aspect ratio and a surface area of 0.01 m2, ˜20 mW/m2 becomes ˜0.7 mW/m. Thus, linear BMFCs should meet or exceed ˜0.7 mW/m to be competitive with carbon fabric panels.
The process of fraying cable anodes involves exposing short strands of the carbon yarn 330 as shown in
Connecting titanium wire for the cable anodes are cut to approximately 140 cm lengths and the insulation was stripped from a 3 cm length at one end of each segment. To attach the wires, the stripped end of each connector was inserted underneath the titanium wire mesh, making contact with several (2-3) of the individual wires in the mesh of each of the cable segments. Several tie-wraps were used to hold the connecting wire and carbon layer firmly in place.
Power generation of two types of cable anodes were tested in duplicate for over 25 days in an anode-limited BMFC. A pair of cable anodes used as-is (untreated) with the Binder intact and another pair of cable anodes that were treated in the heated bath. Binder removal resulted in a mass loss of 1.49±0.02 g (n=3), which was 8.3% of the original mass. Untreated anodes showed a two-peak power response at day 6 and day 9 followed by a consistently poor power density output of 0.18 mW/m at the end of 26 days of operation. The treated anodes responded in the typical growth response for BMFCs reaching a power density of 1.57 and 1.94 mW/m. At peak, untreated anodes performed at only 54% of the average steady power of the treated anodes. At steady performance, that percentage drops to only 11%, which proves that the Binder had an overall negative effect on anode performance.
In a separate experiment, the effect of fraying was tested on anode-limited BMFCs. Similar to the Binder removal experiment, two sets of duplicate cable anodes were prepared with one set frayed and the second set not frayed. Frayed cable anodes reached power densities of 1.48 and 1.33 mW/m after 47 days of BMFC operation. On average, fraying produced 8.3× more power over the unfrayed cable anodes, which produced 0.21 and 0.13 mW/m after 47 days of BMFC operation. The end of experiment power output for both controls were consistent, which was expected because all four anodes were used untreated.
Both binder removal and fraying have a net positive effect on power generation by BMFCs studied here. Used as-is, the cable anodes perform poorly against our benchmark of ˜0.7 mW/m. Operating at 30% of the benchmark is not acceptable. Factoring in either treatment, however, improves the cable anode performance and makes it competitive with the carbon fabric panels. Within the context of the comparison between fabric panel anodes and cable anodes, there is merit in considering the linear form as it bypasses most of the deployment issue related to fabric panel anodes.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
This document is a nonprovisional patent application, claiming the benefit of, and priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/403,683, entitled “Linear-Array Benthic Microbial Fuel Cell,” filed on Oct. 3, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Linear Array Benthic Microbial Fuel Cell System and Methods is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 72120, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice (619) 553-5118; email ssc_pac_T2@navy.mil. Reference Navy Case Number 103564.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62403683 | Oct 2016 | US |