The present disclosure relates generally to the field of data processing systems and particularly to a system and method for improving the graphics performance of hosted applications.
For low latency applications such as video games, it is critical that graphics operations proceed as efficiently as possible. However, attempts to speed the graphics rendering process may result in undesirable visual artifacts such as “tearing” in which information from two or more different frames is shown on a display device in a single screen draw. The embodiments of the invention described below provide a variety of techniques for improving the efficiency of graphics rendering while at the same time reducing these undesirable visual artifacts.
The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the disclosed subject matter to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
In the following description specific details are set forth, such as device types, system configurations, communication methods, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, persons having ordinary skill in the relevant arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the embodiments described.
The assignee of the present application has developed an online video gaming and application hosting system. Certain embodiments of this system are described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,077, filed Aug. 7, 2009, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATED MACHINE SWITCHING (hereinafter '077 application) which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/210,888, filed, Mar. 23, 2009, and is a continuation-in-part (CIP) application of Ser. No. 10/315,460 filed Dec. 10, 2002 entitled, “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS VIDEO GAMING”, which is assigned to the assignee of the present CIP application. These applications are sometimes referred to as the “co-pending applications” and are incorporated herein by reference. A brief description of certain pertinent aspects of the online video game and application hosting system described in the co-pending applications will now be provided, following by a detailed description of a virtualization and encryption system and method for hosting applications.
As shown in
As games and applications software become more complex and more photo-realistic, they will require higher-performance CPUs, GPUs, more RAM, and larger and faster disk drives, and the computing power at the hosting service 210 may be continually upgraded, but the end user will not be required to update the home or office client platform 215 since its processing requirements will remain constant for a display resolution and frame rate with a given video decompression algorithm. Thus, the hardware limitations and compatibility issues seen today do not exist in the illustrated system.
Further, because the game and application software executes only in servers in the hosting service 210, there never is a copy of the game or application software (either in the form of optical media, or as downloaded software) in the user's home or office (“office” as used herein unless otherwise qualified shall include any non-residential setting, including, schoolrooms, for example). This significantly mitigates the likelihood of a game or application software being illegally copied (pirated), as well as mitigating the likelihood of a valuable database that might be use by a game or applications software being pirated, exploited or otherwise compromised. Indeed, if specialized servers are required (e.g., requiring very expensive, large or noisy equipment) to play the game or application software that are not practical for home or office use, then even if a pirated copy of the game or application software were obtained, it would not be operable in the home or office.
Inbound internet traffic 301 from user clients 215 is directed to inbound routing 302. Typically, inbound internet traffic 301 will enter the server center via a high-speed fiber optic connection to the Internet, but any network connection means of adequate bandwidth, reliability and low latency will suffice. Inbound routing 302 is a system of network (the network can be implemented as an Ethernet network, a fiber channel network, or through any other transport means) switches and routing servers supporting the switches which takes the arriving packets and routes each packet to the appropriate application/game (“app/game”) server 321-325. In one embodiment, a packet which is delivered to a particular app/game server represents a subset of the data received from the client and/or may be translated/changed by other components (e.g., networking components such as gateways and routers) within the data center. In some cases, packets will be routed to more than one server 321-325 at a time, for example, if a game or application is running on multiple servers at once in parallel. RAID arrays 311-312 are connected to the inbound routing network 302, such that the app/game servers 321-325 can read and write to the RAID arrays 311-312. Further, a RAID array 315 (which may be implemented as multiple RAID arrays) is also connected to the inbound routing 302 and data from RAID array 315 can be read from app/game servers 321-325. The inbound routing 302 may be implemented in a wide range of prior art network architectures, including a tree structure of switches, with the inbound internet traffic 301 at its root; in a mesh structure interconnecting all of the various devices; or as an interconnected series of subnets, with concentrated traffic amongst intercommunicating device segregated from concentrated traffic amongst other devices. One type of network configuration is a SAN which, although typically used for storage devices, it can also be used for general high-speed data transfer among devices. Also, the app/game servers 321-325 may each have multiple network connections to the inbound routing 302. For example, a server 321-325 may have a network connection to a subnet attached to RAID Arrays 311-312 and another network connection to a subnet attached to other devices.
The app/game servers 321-325 may all be configured the same, some differently, or all differently, as previously described. In one embodiment, each user, when using the hosting service is typically using at least one app/game server 321-325. For the sake of simplicity of explanation, we shall assume a given user is using app/game server 321, but multiple servers could be used by one user, and multiple users could share a single app/game server 321-325. The user's control input, sent from client 215 as previously described is received as inbound Internet traffic 301, and is routed through inbound routing 302 to app/game server 321. App/game server 321 uses the user's control input as control input to the game or application running on the server, and computes the next frame of video and the audio associated with it. App/game server 321 then outputs the uncompressed video/audio 329 to shared video compression 330. App/game server may output the uncompressed video via any means, including one or more Gigabit Ethernet connections, but in one embodiment the video is output via a DVI connection and the audio and other compression and communication channel state information is output via a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.
The shared video compression 330 compresses the uncompressed video and audio from the app/game servers 321-325. The compression maybe implemented entirely in hardware, or in hardware running software. There may a dedicated compressor for each app/game server 321-325, or if the compressors are fast enough, a given compressor can be used to compress the video/audio from more than one app/game server 321-325. For example, at 60 fps a video frame time is 16.67 ms. If a compressor is able to compress a frame in 1 ms, then that compressor could be used to compress the video/audio from as many as 16 app/game servers 321-325 by taking input from one server after another, with the compressor saving the state of each video/audio compression process and switching context as it cycles amongst the video/audio streams from the servers. This results in substantial cost savings in compression hardware. Since different servers will be completing frames at different times, in one embodiment, the compressor resources are in a shared pool 330 with shared storage means (e.g., RAM, Flash) for storing the state of each compression process, and when a server 321-325 frame is complete and ready to be compressed, a control means determines which compression resource is available at that time, provides the compression resource with the state of the server's compression process and the frame of uncompressed video/audio to compress.
Note that part of the state for each server's compression process includes information about the compression itself, such as the previous frame's decompressed frame buffer data which may be used as a reference for P tiles, the resolution of the video output; the quality of the compression; the tiling structure; the allocation of bits per tiles; the compression quality, the audio format (e.g., stereo, surround sound, Dolby® AC-3). But the compression process state also includes communication channel state information regarding the peak data rate and whether a previous frame is currently being output (and as result the current frame should be ignored), and potentially whether there are channel characteristics which should be considered in the compression, such as excessive packet loss, which affect decisions for the compression (e.g., in terms of the frequency of I tiles, etc). As the peak data rate or other channel characteristics change over time, as determined by an app/game server 321-325 supporting each user monitoring data sent from the client 215, the app/game server 321-325 sends the relevant information to the shared hardware compression 330. These and other features of the hosting service 210 are described in detail the co-pending applications.
The shared hardware compression 330 also packetizes the compressed video/audio using means such as those previously described, and if appropriate, applying FEC codes, duplicating certain data, or taking other steps to as to adequately ensure the ability of the video/audio data stream to be received by the client 215 and decompressed with as high a quality and reliability as feasible.
Some applications, such as those described below, require the video/audio output of a given app/game server 321-325 to be available at multiple resolutions (or in other multiple formats) simultaneously. If the app/game server 321-325 so notifies the shared hardware compression 330 resource, then the uncompressed video/audio 329 of that app/game server 321-325 will be simultaneously compressed in different formats, different resolutions, and/or in different packet/error correction structures. In some cases, some compression resources can be shared amongst multiple compression processes compressing the same video/audio (e.g., in many compression algorithms, there is a step whereby the image is scaled to multiple sizes before applying compression. If different size images are required to be output, then this step can be used to serve several compression processes at once). In other cases, separate compression resources will be required for each format. In any case, the compressed video/audio 339 of all of the various resolutions and formats required for a given app/game server 321-325 (be it one or many) will be output at once to outbound routing 340. In one embodiment the output of the compressed video/audio 339 is in UDP format, so it is a unidirectional stream of packets.
The outbound routing network 340 comprises a series of routing servers and switches which direct each compressed video/audio stream to the intended user(s) or other destinations through outbound Internet traffic 399 interface (which typically would connect to a fiber interface to the Internet) and/or back to the delay buffer 315 (implemented as a RAID array in one embodiment), and/or back to the inbound routing 302, and/or out through a private network (not shown) for video distribution. Note that (as described below) the outbound routing 340 may output a given video/audio stream to multiple destinations at once. In one embodiment this is implemented using Internet Protocol (IP) multicast in which a given UDP stream intended to be streamed to multiple destinations at once is broadcasted, and the broadcast is repeated by the routing servers and switches in the outbound routing 340. The multiple destinations of the broadcast may be to multiple users' clients via the Internet, to multiple app/game servers 321-325 via inbound routing 302, and/or to one or more delay buffers 315. Thus, the output of a given server 321-322 is compressed into one or multiple formats, and each compressed stream is directed to one or multiple destinations.
Further, in another embodiment, if multiple app/game servers 321-325 are used simultaneously by one user (e.g., in a parallel processing configuration to create the 3D output of a complex scene) and each server is producing part of the resulting image, the video output of multiple servers 321-325 can be combined by the shared hardware compression 330 into a combined frame, and from that point forward it is handled as described above as if it came from a single app/game server 321-325.
Note that in one embodiment, a copy (in at least the resolution or higher of video viewed by the user) of all video generated by app/game servers 321-325 is recorded in delay buffer 315 for at least some number of minutes (15 minutes in one embodiment). This allows each user to “rewind” the video from each session in order to review previous work or exploits (in the case of a game). Thus, in one embodiment, each compressed video/audio output 339 stream being routed to a user client 215 is also being multicasted to a delay buffer 315. When the video/audio is stored on a delay buffer 315, a directory on the delay buffer 315 provides a cross reference between the network address of the app/game server 321-325 that is the source of the delayed video/audio and the location on the delay buffer 315 where the delayed video/audio can be found.
For low latency applications such as video games, it is critical that graphics operations proceed as efficiently as possible. However, attempts to speed the graphics rendering process may result in undesirable visual artifacts such as “tearing” in which information from two or more different frames is shown on a display device in a single screen draw. The embodiments of the invention described below provide a variety of techniques for improving the efficiency of graphics rendering while at the same time reducing these undesirable visual artifacts.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, both the CPU and GPU are pipelined processors, meaning that a set of data processing stages are connected in series within the CPU and GPU, so that the output of one stage is the input of the next one. By way of example, the CPU pipeline typically includes an instruction fetch stage, an instruction decode stage, an execution stage and a retirement stage, each of which may have multiple sub-stages. A GPU pipeline may have many more stages including, by way of example and not limitation, transformation, vertex lighting, viewing transformation, primitive generation, project transformation, clipping, viewport transformation, rasterization, texturing, fragment shading and display. These pipeline stages are well understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and will not be described in detail herein. The elements of a pipeline are often executed in parallel or in time-sliced fashion and some amount of queuing storage is often required between stages of the pipeline.
Each of the above stages and the queuing required between the stages adds a certain amount of latency to the execution of graphics commands. The embodiments of the invention below provide techniques for minimizing this latency. Reducing latency is important because it expands the markets in which a device can be used. Moreover, the manufacturer of a device may not have control over significant sources of latency. For example, a user may attach a high latency television to a video game console or a multimedia device may be used remotely (e.g., online video games, a medical device controlled over the internet or military devices engaging targets on the front line while the operator remains safely behind the lines).
As illustrated in
The obvious first step to minimizing latency is to minimize the queues or even get rid of them entirely. One common way to do this is to synchronize the pipeline stages as per
This slowest stage in the pipeline is the bottleneck, P4 in all figures. This stage is often a fixed feature of the device over which a designer has no control.
This inspires a method for minimizing the latency of pipeline stages upstream from the bottleneck as per
Another embodiment is illustrated in
In one embodiment of the invention, shown in
The preceding figures illustrated lightweight applications. These are inefficient because the hardware sits around idle most of the time. One embodiment of the invention which forms a less expensive design is one which dedicates the minimum hardware resources to each stage but still guarantees that each stage is faster than the bottleneck stage, as illustrated in
This embodiment leads directly to another embodiment of the invention in which advanced graphics is implemented using minimal hardware, but with low latency. In this embodiment, the video stream is subdivided into two logical parts which may be processed independently: (a) a resource light, latency critical part, and (b) a resource heavy, latency tolerant part. These two parts can be combined in a hybrid system as illustrated in
In this embodiment, the CPU completes its work on the background image, represented by 3b, before completing its work on avatar image, represented by 2a. Nonetheless, to reduce latency associated with the avatar, the GPU processes 2a ahead of 3b, rendering the avatar 2a on a previously rendered background 2b (to render the motion of the avatar as efficiently as possible) outputs that frame, and then immediately begins rendering the background of the next frame, represented by 3b. The GPU may sit idle for a short time waiting for data from the CPU to complete the next frame. In this embodiment, the CPU sits idle waiting for the phase lock to signal that it's time to make a list of drawing commands for the user's avatar and pass it on to the GPU. The CPU then immediately begins to draw the background of a new frame but it can't be the next frame because the GPU will start drawing the next frame. There's no way the CPU will have the next frame ready in time. Therefore, the CPU must start drawing the background for the frame after the next. This situation is similar to the operation of a synchronized pipeline as illustrated in
This one frame phase difference between the avatar and the background is, in most cases, acceptable to the user. However, in cases where highest possible quality is desired, the following additional techniques may be employed. The high latency path predicts the inputs to generate the data. In the first person shooter example, the location of the camera is predicted ahead of time. When the output of the high and low latency paths are combined, the output of the high latency path (e.g., the background) is modified to more closely match what would have been generated using the actual inputs instead of the predicted inputs. In the first person shooter example, the background would be translated, scaled, and/or rotated in order to match the actual camera position. Note this implies the high latency path would have to render an area somewhat larger than what is actually viewed by the player as illustrated in
As another example, when a user is playing a first person shooter video game and pushes the fire button, the user wants to immediately see flames coming out of the gun. Thus, in one embodiment, the program draws the firing gun on top of a previously rendered background and the game times it so that the frame is done just in time to be picked up by the next stage in the pipeline (which is the dvi output (vsync) or the encoder input or some other bottleneck). Then the game draws its best guess at what the background should be for the next frame. If the guess is poor, then one embodiment modifies the background to more closely match what it would have been if the it had been rendered from the correct camera position. Thus, the technique shown in
In one embodiment, the various functional modules illustrated herein and the associated steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
In one embodiment, the modules may be implemented on a programmable digital signal processor (“DSP”) such as a Texas Instruments' TMS320x architecture (e.g., a TMS320C6000, TMS320C5000, . . . etc). Various different DSPs may be used while still complying with these underlying principles.
Embodiments may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. Various elements which are not relevant to these underlying principles such as computer memory, hard drive, input devices, have been left out of some or all of the figures to avoid obscuring the pertinent aspects.
Elements of the disclosed subject matter may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable instructions. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, flash memory, optical disks, CD-ROMs, DVD ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, propagation media or other type of machine-readable media suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program which may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
It should also be understood that elements of the disclosed subject matter may also be provided as a computer program product which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (e.g., a processor or other electronic device) to perform a sequence of operations. Alternatively, the operations may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, propagation media or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, elements of the disclosed subject matter may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer or electronic device to a requesting process by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).
Additionally, although the disclosed subject matter has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, numerous modifications and alterations are well within the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,077, filed Aug. 7, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,138,644 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATED MACHINE SWITCHING, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/210,888, filed, Mar. 23, 2009, and is a continuation-in-part (CIP) application of Ser. No. 10/315,460 filed Dec. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,849,491 entitled, “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS VIDEO GAMING”, which is assigned to the assignee of the present CIP application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4539706 | Mears et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4573074 | Alaria et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4616263 | Eichelberger | Oct 1986 | A |
5058199 | Grube | Oct 1991 | A |
5129096 | Burns | Jul 1992 | A |
5185599 | Doornink et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5222246 | Wolkstein | Jun 1993 | A |
5357604 | San et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5408679 | Masuda | Apr 1995 | A |
5493644 | Thayer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5509028 | Marque-Pucheu | Apr 1996 | A |
5558339 | Perlman | Sep 1996 | A |
5586247 | Yoshifuji et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586257 | Perlman | Dec 1996 | A |
5599232 | Darling | Feb 1997 | A |
5603012 | Sotheran | Feb 1997 | A |
5608412 | Welles, II et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618045 | Kagan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640386 | Wiedeman | Jun 1997 | A |
5642171 | Baumgartner et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646676 | Dewkett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654747 | Ottesen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682204 | Uz et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5710719 | Houle | Jan 1998 | A |
5732076 | Ketseoglou et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742289 | Naylor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742680 | Wilson | Apr 1998 | A |
5751378 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5790176 | Craig | Aug 1998 | A |
5815146 | Youden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828370 | Moeller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5870665 | Uchikawa | Feb 1999 | A |
5872575 | Segal | Feb 1999 | A |
5884101 | Wu | Mar 1999 | A |
5890055 | Chu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915020 | Tilford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926208 | Noonen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5956088 | Shen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959592 | Petruzzelli | Sep 1999 | A |
5974503 | Venkatesh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987376 | Olson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999808 | LaDue | Dec 1999 | A |
6009060 | Kim | Dec 1999 | A |
6052814 | Karasawa | Apr 2000 | A |
6057847 | Jenkins | May 2000 | A |
6057850 | Kichury | May 2000 | A |
6092117 | Gladwin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110041 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115369 | Oura | Sep 2000 | A |
6132306 | Trompower | Oct 2000 | A |
6148142 | Anderson | Nov 2000 | A |
6160993 | Wilson | Dec 2000 | A |
6166703 | Muterspaugh | Dec 2000 | A |
6175854 | Bretscher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188571 | Roganti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205185 | Kajiwara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241612 | Heredia | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263503 | Margulis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292589 | Chow et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292847 | Nishimoto et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307567 | Cohen-Or | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323909 | Michener et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331856 | Van Hook et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347216 | Marko et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6397038 | Green, Sr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404775 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409602 | Wiltshire et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412112 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414725 | Clarin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421385 | Uenoyama et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424817 | Hadden et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430233 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466248 | Spann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473858 | Shimomura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6585596 | Leifer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594313 | Hazra et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597891 | Tantawy et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600730 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614768 | Mahany et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631410 | Kowalski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650869 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664969 | Emerson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665872 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667944 | Monden et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671186 | Kopf | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678502 | Sugaya et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684058 | Karacaoglu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690657 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690726 | Yavits et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690926 | Tawil et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6721280 | Mauro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724826 | Varian | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728541 | Ohkura et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6741841 | Mitchell | May 2004 | B1 |
6745050 | Forsythe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754241 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757913 | Knox | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760487 | Linares | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785262 | Yao et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788882 | Geer et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792615 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810528 | Chatani | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6811113 | Silansky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820218 | Barga et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830515 | Rowe | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832071 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836658 | Sharon et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842617 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845090 | Takabatake et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850285 | Eaton et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853197 | McFarland et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856786 | Belostotsky et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859498 | Choi | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6873654 | Rackett | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6886029 | Pecus et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6908390 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925285 | Kim | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947044 | Kulas | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963353 | Firestone | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968153 | Heinonen et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973667 | Fritsch et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6993353 | Desai et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996742 | Lerman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016419 | Tardif | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028304 | Weinberger et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7072627 | Coffin, III | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089319 | Lysenko et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099388 | Cooper | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7155515 | Brown et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158679 | Sano et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215660 | Perlman | May 2007 | B2 |
7219153 | Day | May 2007 | B1 |
7244181 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263125 | Lainema | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272613 | Sim et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289478 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295614 | Shen et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299487 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7340764 | Kubota et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359004 | Yu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7423990 | Kelton et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430187 | Holt et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7461161 | Horiguchi | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471665 | Perlman | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477688 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7493078 | Perlman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502849 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7543326 | Moni | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548657 | Deaven | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558525 | Perlman | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567527 | Perlman | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7587520 | Kent et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590084 | Perlman | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593361 | Perlman | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7680038 | Gourlay | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7684752 | Perlman | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702006 | Kunii et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715336 | Perlman | May 2010 | B2 |
7738391 | Melpignano et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7841946 | Walker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848409 | Wang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7878908 | Sloate et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916147 | Clemie et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936376 | Fukuhara | May 2011 | B2 |
8147339 | Perry | Apr 2012 | B1 |
20010007575 | Mori et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010024974 | Cohen | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034743 | Thomas | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004838 | Hakenberg | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009149 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015513 | Ando et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019984 | Rakib | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028655 | Rosener et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034980 | Lemmons et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038459 | Talmola et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046285 | Yasushi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056120 | McTernan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059614 | Lipsanen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059637 | Rakib | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061743 | Hutcheson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068592 | Hutcheson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069265 | Bountour et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020071658 | Marko et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072329 | Bandeira et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073429 | Beane et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075382 | Cohen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080267 | Moluf | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020106019 | Chaddha et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020106119 | Foran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114330 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115409 | Khayrallah | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118758 | Sekiguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128065 | Chung et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133491 | Sim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149617 | Becker | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152303 | Dispensa | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154055 | Davis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157115 | Lu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165927 | Theriault et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020166119 | Cristofalo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170065 | Pinnick | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181189 | Yang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181190 | Callado | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184303 | Uner | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184314 | Riise | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188955 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009535 | Apostolopulos | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017846 | Estevez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037156 | Mallart | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048808 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054827 | Schmidl et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056168 | Krishnamachari et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078103 | LeMay et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079016 | Tsao | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124977 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135860 | Dureau | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139150 | Rodriguez et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158700 | Forler et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177187 | Levine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181162 | Matula | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181229 | Forster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030207684 | Wesel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216144 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220072 | Coffin, III | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226149 | Chun et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229719 | Iwata et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234804 | Parker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003104 | Boskovic et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025190 | McCalla et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034865 | Barrett et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043819 | Willis | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048669 | Rowe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052371 | Watanabe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057516 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064504 | Domschitz | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080533 | Nishtala et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093372 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094194 | Aldoretta et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097288 | Sloate et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102245 | Escalera et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110469 | Judd et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111755 | Perlman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114576 | Itoh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125820 | Rios | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153764 | Paradkar | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153933 | Ejima et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203694 | Wong et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204102 | Kuehnel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224769 | Hansen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050047496 | McIntire et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100100 | Unger | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104889 | Clemie et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135480 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147164 | Wu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183120 | Jain et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188073 | Nakamichi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201460 | Kang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050286448 | Proctor et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060029065 | Fellman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069623 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078046 | Lu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078051 | Liang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098592 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111186 | Hattori | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116208 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060117344 | Lamkin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060117371 | Margulis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133513 | Kounnas | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136569 | Tenhunen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146830 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060148571 | Hossack et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060150055 | Quinard et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154710 | Serafat | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183421 | Proctor et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195884 | van Zoest et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224761 | Howarth et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230428 | Craig et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242240 | Parker et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258463 | Cugno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009015 | Kunii et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009029 | Craig et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025631 | Kim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047901 | Ando et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058937 | Ando et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073779 | Walker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094700 | Wolfe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121629 | Cuijpers et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070147514 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156815 | Mate et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165035 | Duluk et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183493 | Kimpe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202941 | Miltenberger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206673 | Cipolli et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226364 | Landspurg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260492 | Feied et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260677 | DeMarco et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271358 | Gaddy | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297509 | Mizobuchi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008276 | Yokoyama | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025196 | Karaoguz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032794 | Ware et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045338 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080207322 | Mizrahi | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211901 | Civanlar et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220878 | Michaelis | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225735 | Qiu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247463 | Buttimer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268947 | Fyock et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276269 | Miller et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298376 | Takeda et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003452 | Au et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006736 | Pantos | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028230 | Leitner | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090109988 | Musunuri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144425 | Marr et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144792 | Fielibert et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198606 | Craig et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100035691 | Wild et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100064002 | Levanon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080292 | Coulombe | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111410 | Iu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124274 | Cheok et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150231 | Huang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100226262 | Liu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248843 | Karsten | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250770 | Barreto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110039612 | Pececnik | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110157197 | Clemie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110228845 | Banerjee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120075317 | Clemie et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120198510 | Stoneback | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0554586 | Dec 1992 | EP |
1094642 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1104686 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1130920 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1202472 | May 2002 | EP |
1837060 | Sep 2007 | EP |
96-11928 | Dec 2006 | IL |
09-212661 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2001111575 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001244864 | Sep 2001 | JP |
20020092022 | Dec 2002 | KR |
WO-9641479 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9742766 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-0050971 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0141447 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-02060183 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02078369 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03032666 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03047710 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03075116 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2006134055 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007130012 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2010141492 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2010141522 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,171, Sep. 1, 2010, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,086, mailed Oct. 7, 2010, 10 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,076 mailed Oct. 12, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,229, mailed Oct. 26, 2011. 8 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,218, mailed Sep. 13, 2011. 9 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,090, mailed Jan. 26, 2012, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Dec. 13, 2011, 13 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Apr. 11, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,127, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,140, mailed Mar. 29, 2011. 6 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,171, mailed May 9, 2011, 18 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,187, mailed Mar. 29, 2011. 7 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,187, mailed Feb. 14, 2012. 9 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077 mailed Aug. 12, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,226, mailed Apr. 3, 2012, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,227, mailed Apr. 10, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,150, mailed Mar. 23, 2012, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,140, mailed Mar. 20, 2012, 13 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,041, mailed Mar. 19, 2012, 9 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,233, mailed Apr. 20, 2012, 8 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,054, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 12 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,062, mailed May 10, 2012, 13 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,096, mailed Jun. 26, 2012, 13 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,218, mailed Jun. 25, 2012, 26 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,076, mailed Jun. 25, 2012, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,229, mailed Oct. 5, 2012, 2011, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,054, mailed Aug. 24, 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,041, mailed Sep. 19, 2012, 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Aug. 28, 2012, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,090, mailed Dec. 4, 2012, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,127, mailed Jan. 9, 2013, 30 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,227, mailed Dec. 11, 2012, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,233, mailed Jan. 28, 2013, 31 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,096, mailed Dec. 13, 2012, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077, mailed Jun. 19, 2013, 19 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for foreign counterpart PCT Application No. PCT/US13/33744 mailed Sep. 30, 2013, 12 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077, mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 33 pages. |
“Accelerated Graphics Port Interfaces Specification”, Intel Corporation, Revision 1.0, Jul. 31, 1996, 161 pages. |
“IP Multicast Technical Overview”, Cisco Systems, Aug. 2007., 9. |
Boulware, Jack , “Power Houses”, “Wired”, Nov. 2002, Issue 10.11, Wired Digital, Inc., 8 pages, (Nov. 2002). |
Bronez, Thomas , et al., “Shipboard experiments for a multishop 802.11 communications system—RF channel characterization and MAC performance measurement”, Military Communications Conference, 2005. MILCOM 2005. IEEE. The MITRE Corporation Mclean, VA., (2005), 7 pages. |
Bungie, “HALO 3 How-to: Saved Films, New ViDOC”, http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link=h3savedfilms, Sep. 20, 2007, pp. 1-8. |
Dickinson, Patrick, “Instant Replay: Building a Game Engine with Reproducible Behavior”, http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3057/instant—replay—building—a—game.php?print, pp. 1-6. |
Duong, Ta Nguyen Binh, “A Dynamic Load Sharing Algorithm for Massively Multiplayer Online Games:”, IEEE, 2003, pp. 131-136. |
Everitt, C., “Projective Texture Mapping” nVidia white paper last updated Apr. 24, 2001, 7 pages. |
Frauenfelder, M., “G-Cluster Makes Games to Go”, The Feature: It's All About the Mobile Internet, http://www.thefeaturearchives.com/13267.html, 3 pages, 2001. |
IDS and characterization of references submitted by Inventor in related applications, 7 pages, May 24, 2013. |
Laulajainen, J., et al., “Experiments with QOS-Aware Gaming-on-Demand Service” Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2006, vol. 1, Apr. 18, 2006, pp. 805-810, XP010915314, DOI: 10.1109/AINA.2006.175, ISBN: 978-0-7695-2466-5. |
Jarvinen, S., et al., “QoS-Aware real-time video encoding How to Improve the User Experience of a Gaming-on-Demand Service”, Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 2, Jan. 8, 2006, pp. 994-997, XP010893324, DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2006.1593. |
Kubota, Shuji, “High-Quality Frame-Synchronization for Satellite Video Signal Transmission”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 430-440. |
Levoy, M., “Polygon-Assisted JPEG and MPEG Compression of Synthetic Images”, Computer and Graphics Proceedings, Los Angeles, Aug. 6-11, 1995, Computer Graphics Proceedings (SIGGRAPH), New York, IEEE, US., pp. 21-28. |
Nguyen, Cong Duc, “Optimal Assignment of Distributed Servers to Virtual Partitions for the Provision of Immersive Voice Communication in Massively Multiplayer Games”, Computer Communications 29 2006, available online Nov. 15, 2005, pp. 1260-1270. |
Perry, David , U.S. Appl. No. 61/014,036, filed Dec. 15, 2007, entitled, “Systems and Methods of Serving Game Video”, 39 pages. |
Yoon, et al., “Web Based remote rendering with IBRAC (Image-based rendering acceleration and compression)”, European Association for Computer Graphics, 21 Annual Conference, Eurographics, Interlaken, Switzerlmand, Aug. 21-25, 2000, 10 pages. |
Wallach, D., et al., “Accelerated MPEG Compression of Dynamic Polygonal Scens”, computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, SIGGRAPH, Jul. 24, 1994, pp. 193-196. |
Wu, Dapeng, “Transporting Real-time Video over the Internet: Challenges and Approaches”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-18. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/033744, mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 7 pages. |
Taiwan App. No. 102110747, Search Report, Feb. 18, 2016. |
Sheaffer, et al., “A Flexible Simulation Framework for Graphics Architectures”, HWWS '04 Proc of the ACM Siggraph/Eurographics Conf., The Eurographics Assn. 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120299940 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61210888 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12538077 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13430269 | US | |
Parent | 10315460 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 12538077 | US |