System and method for improving the graphics performance of hosted applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9446305
  • Patent Number
    9,446,305
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 26, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 20, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for efficiently processing a video stream using limited hardware and/or software resources. For example, one embodiment of a computer-implemented method for efficiently processing a video stream with a processor pipeline having a plurality of pipeline stages, comprises: identifying a bottleneck stage within the processor pipeline the bottleneck stage processing frames of the video stream; receiving a feedback signal from the bottleneck stage at one or more upstream stages, the feedback signal providing an indication of the speed at which the bottleneck stage is processing the frames of the video stream; and responsively adjusting the speed at which the one or more upstream stages are processing frames of the video stream to approximate the speed at which the bottleneck stage is processing the frames of the video stream.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to the field of data processing systems and particularly to a system and method for improving the graphics performance of hosted applications.


BACKGROUND

For low latency applications such as video games, it is critical that graphics operations proceed as efficiently as possible. However, attempts to speed the graphics rendering process may result in undesirable visual artifacts such as “tearing” in which information from two or more different frames is shown on a display device in a single screen draw. The embodiments of the invention described below provide a variety of techniques for improving the efficiency of graphics rendering while at the same time reducing these undesirable visual artifacts.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the disclosed subject matter to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.



FIG. 1 illustrates a system architecture for executing online video games according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates different communication channels over which an online video game may be played in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a system architecture for compressing audio/video generated by a video game.



FIG. 4 illustrates a system architecture according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 5-12 illustrate data flow between various system components and feedback employed in one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 13 illustrates distinctions between a predicted camera location and an actual camera location.





DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

In the following description specific details are set forth, such as device types, system configurations, communication methods, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, persons having ordinary skill in the relevant arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the embodiments described.


The assignee of the present application has developed an online video gaming and application hosting system. Certain embodiments of this system are described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,077, filed Aug. 7, 2009, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATED MACHINE SWITCHING (hereinafter '077 application) which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/210,888, filed, Mar. 23, 2009, and is a continuation-in-part (CIP) application of Ser. No. 10/315,460 filed Dec. 10, 2002 entitled, “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS VIDEO GAMING”, which is assigned to the assignee of the present CIP application. These applications are sometimes referred to as the “co-pending applications” and are incorporated herein by reference. A brief description of certain pertinent aspects of the online video game and application hosting system described in the co-pending applications will now be provided, following by a detailed description of a virtualization and encryption system and method for hosting applications.


An Exemplary Online Video Game and Application Hosting System


FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a video game/application hosting service 210 described in the co-pending applications. The Hosting Service 210 hosts applications running on Servers 102, that accept input from an Input device 121 received by Home or Office Client 115, and sent through the Internet 110 to the Hosting Service 210. The Servers 102 are responsive to the input, and update their video and audio output accordingly which is compressed through Low-Latency Video Compression 104. The compressed video is then streamed through the Internet 110 to be decompressed by the Home or Office Client 115, and then displayed on a monitor or SD/HDTV 122. This system is a low-latency streaming interactive video system as more thoroughly described in the aforementioned “co-pending applications.”


As shown in FIG. 2, the network connection between the Hosting Service 210 and Home and Office Client 215 may be implemented through a wide range of network technologies, of varying degrees of reliability, such as wired or optical fiber technologies that are typically more reliable and wireless technologies that may be subject to unpredictable interference or range limitations (e.g. Wi-Fi) and are typically less reliable. Any of these client devices may have their own user input devices (e.g., keyboards, buttons, touch screens, track pads or inertial-sensing wands, video capture cameras and/or motion-tracking cameras, etc.), or they may use external input devices 221 (e.g., keyboards, mice, game controllers, inertial sensing wand, video capture cameras and/or motion tracking cameras, etc.), connected with wires or wirelessly. As described in greater detail below, the hosting service 210 includes servers of various levels of performance, including those with high-powered CPU/GPU processing capabilities. During playing of a game or use of an application on the hosting service 210, a home or office client device 215 receives keyboard and/or controller input from the user, and then it transmits the controller input through the Internet 206 to the hosting service 210 that executes the gaming program code in response and generates successive frames of video output (a sequence of video images) for the game or application software (e.g., if the user presses a button which would direct a character on the screen to move to the right, the game program would then create a sequence of video images showing the character moving to the right). This sequence of video images is then compressed using a low-latency video compressor, and the hosting service 210 then transmits the low-latency video stream through the Internet 206. The home or office client device then decodes the compressed video stream and renders the decompressed video images on a monitor or TV. Consequently, the computing and graphical hardware requirements of the client device 215 are significantly reduced. The client 215 only needs to have the processing power to forward the keyboard/controller input to the Internet 206 and decode and decompress a compressed video stream received from the Internet 206, which virtually any personal computer is capable of doing today in software on its CPU (e.g., a Intel Corporation Core Duo CPU running at approximately 2 GHz is capable of decompressing 720p HDTV encoded using compressors such as H.264 and Windows Media VC9). And, in the case of any client devices, dedicated chips can also perform video decompression for such standards in real-time at far lower cost and with far less power consumption than a general-purpose CPU such as would be required for a modern PC. Notably, to perform the function of forwarding controller input and decompressing video, home client devices 205 do not require any specialized graphics processing units (GP Us), optical drive or hard drives.


As games and applications software become more complex and more photo-realistic, they will require higher-performance CPUs, GPUs, more RAM, and larger and faster disk drives, and the computing power at the hosting service 210 may be continually upgraded, but the end user will not be required to update the home or office client platform 215 since its processing requirements will remain constant for a display resolution and frame rate with a given video decompression algorithm. Thus, the hardware limitations and compatibility issues seen today do not exist in the illustrated system.


Further, because the game and application software executes only in servers in the hosting service 210, there never is a copy of the game or application software (either in the form of optical media, or as downloaded software) in the user's home or office (“office” as used herein unless otherwise qualified shall include any non-residential setting, including, schoolrooms, for example). This significantly mitigates the likelihood of a game or application software being illegally copied (pirated), as well as mitigating the likelihood of a valuable database that might be use by a game or applications software being pirated, exploited or otherwise compromised. Indeed, if specialized servers are required (e.g., requiring very expensive, large or noisy equipment) to play the game or application software that are not practical for home or office use, then even if a pirated copy of the game or application software were obtained, it would not be operable in the home or office.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of components of a server center for hosting service 210 utilized in the following feature descriptions. As with the hosting service 210 illustrated in FIGS. 1-2, the components of this server center are controlled and coordinated by a hosting service 210 control system 101 unless otherwise qualified.


Inbound internet traffic 301 from user clients 215 is directed to inbound routing 302. Typically, inbound internet traffic 301 will enter the server center via a high-speed fiber optic connection to the Internet, but any network connection means of adequate bandwidth, reliability and low latency will suffice. Inbound routing 302 is a system of network (the network can be implemented as an Ethernet network, a fiber channel network, or through any other transport means) switches and routing servers supporting the switches which takes the arriving packets and routes each packet to the appropriate application/game (“app/game”) server 321-325. In one embodiment, a packet which is delivered to a particular app/game server represents a subset of the data received from the client and/or may be translated/changed by other components (e.g., networking components such as gateways and routers) within the data center. In some cases, packets will be routed to more than one server 321-325 at a time, for example, if a game or application is running on multiple servers at once in parallel. RAID arrays 311-312 are connected to the inbound routing network 302, such that the app/game servers 321-325 can read and write to the RAID arrays 311-312. Further, a RAID array 315 (which may be implemented as multiple RAID arrays) is also connected to the inbound routing 302 and data from RAID array 315 can be read from app/game servers 321-325. The inbound routing 302 may be implemented in a wide range of prior art network architectures, including a tree structure of switches, with the inbound internet traffic 301 at its root; in a mesh structure interconnecting all of the various devices; or as an interconnected series of subnets, with concentrated traffic amongst intercommunicating device segregated from concentrated traffic amongst other devices. One type of network configuration is a SAN which, although typically used for storage devices, it can also be used for general high-speed data transfer among devices. Also, the app/game servers 321-325 may each have multiple network connections to the inbound routing 302. For example, a server 321-325 may have a network connection to a subnet attached to RAID Arrays 311-312 and another network connection to a subnet attached to other devices.


The app/game servers 321-325 may all be configured the same, some differently, or all differently, as previously described. In one embodiment, each user, when using the hosting service is typically using at least one app/game server 321-325. For the sake of simplicity of explanation, we shall assume a given user is using app/game server 321, but multiple servers could be used by one user, and multiple users could share a single app/game server 321-325. The user's control input, sent from client 215 as previously described is received as inbound Internet traffic 301, and is routed through inbound routing 302 to app/game server 321. App/game server 321 uses the user's control input as control input to the game or application running on the server, and computes the next frame of video and the audio associated with it. App/game server 321 then outputs the uncompressed video/audio 329 to shared video compression 330. App/game server may output the uncompressed video via any means, including one or more Gigabit Ethernet connections, but in one embodiment the video is output via a DVI connection and the audio and other compression and communication channel state information is output via a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.


The shared video compression 330 compresses the uncompressed video and audio from the app/game servers 321-325. The compression maybe implemented entirely in hardware, or in hardware running software. There may a dedicated compressor for each app/game server 321-325, or if the compressors are fast enough, a given compressor can be used to compress the video/audio from more than one app/game server 321-325. For example, at 60 fps a video frame time is 16.67 ms. If a compressor is able to compress a frame in 1 ms, then that compressor could be used to compress the video/audio from as many as 16 app/game servers 321-325 by taking input from one server after another, with the compressor saving the state of each video/audio compression process and switching context as it cycles amongst the video/audio streams from the servers. This results in substantial cost savings in compression hardware. Since different servers will be completing frames at different times, in one embodiment, the compressor resources are in a shared pool 330 with shared storage means (e.g., RAM, Flash) for storing the state of each compression process, and when a server 321-325 frame is complete and ready to be compressed, a control means determines which compression resource is available at that time, provides the compression resource with the state of the server's compression process and the frame of uncompressed video/audio to compress.


Note that part of the state for each server's compression process includes information about the compression itself, such as the previous frame's decompressed frame buffer data which may be used as a reference for P tiles, the resolution of the video output; the quality of the compression; the tiling structure; the allocation of bits per tiles; the compression quality, the audio format (e.g., stereo, surround sound, Dolby® AC-3). But the compression process state also includes communication channel state information regarding the peak data rate and whether a previous frame is currently being output (and as result the current frame should be ignored), and potentially whether there are channel characteristics which should be considered in the compression, such as excessive packet loss, which affect decisions for the compression (e.g., in terms of the frequency of I tiles, etc). As the peak data rate or other channel characteristics change over time, as determined by an app/game server 321-325 supporting each user monitoring data sent from the client 215, the app/game server 321-325 sends the relevant information to the shared hardware compression 330. These and other features of the hosting service 210 are described in detail the co-pending applications.


The shared hardware compression 330 also packetizes the compressed video/audio using means such as those previously described, and if appropriate, applying FEC codes, duplicating certain data, or taking other steps to as to adequately ensure the ability of the video/audio data stream to be received by the client 215 and decompressed with as high a quality and reliability as feasible.


Some applications, such as those described below, require the video/audio output of a given app/game server 321-325 to be available at multiple resolutions (or in other multiple formats) simultaneously. If the app/game server 321-325 so notifies the shared hardware compression 330 resource, then the uncompressed video/audio 329 of that app/game server 321-325 will be simultaneously compressed in different formats, different resolutions, and/or in different packet/error correction structures. In some cases, some compression resources can be shared amongst multiple compression processes compressing the same video/audio (e.g., in many compression algorithms, there is a step whereby the image is scaled to multiple sizes before applying compression. If different size images are required to be output, then this step can be used to serve several compression processes at once). In other cases, separate compression resources will be required for each format. In any case, the compressed video/audio 339 of all of the various resolutions and formats required for a given app/game server 321-325 (be it one or many) will be output at once to outbound routing 340. In one embodiment the output of the compressed video/audio 339 is in UDP format, so it is a unidirectional stream of packets.


The outbound routing network 340 comprises a series of routing servers and switches which direct each compressed video/audio stream to the intended user(s) or other destinations through outbound Internet traffic 399 interface (which typically would connect to a fiber interface to the Internet) and/or back to the delay buffer 315 (implemented as a RAID array in one embodiment), and/or back to the inbound routing 302, and/or out through a private network (not shown) for video distribution. Note that (as described below) the outbound routing 340 may output a given video/audio stream to multiple destinations at once. In one embodiment this is implemented using Internet Protocol (IP) multicast in which a given UDP stream intended to be streamed to multiple destinations at once is broadcasted, and the broadcast is repeated by the routing servers and switches in the outbound routing 340. The multiple destinations of the broadcast may be to multiple users' clients via the Internet, to multiple app/game servers 321-325 via inbound routing 302, and/or to one or more delay buffers 315. Thus, the output of a given server 321-322 is compressed into one or multiple formats, and each compressed stream is directed to one or multiple destinations.


Further, in another embodiment, if multiple app/game servers 321-325 are used simultaneously by one user (e.g., in a parallel processing configuration to create the 3D output of a complex scene) and each server is producing part of the resulting image, the video output of multiple servers 321-325 can be combined by the shared hardware compression 330 into a combined frame, and from that point forward it is handled as described above as if it came from a single app/game server 321-325.


Note that in one embodiment, a copy (in at least the resolution or higher of video viewed by the user) of all video generated by app/game servers 321-325 is recorded in delay buffer 315 for at least some number of minutes (15 minutes in one embodiment). This allows each user to “rewind” the video from each session in order to review previous work or exploits (in the case of a game). Thus, in one embodiment, each compressed video/audio output 339 stream being routed to a user client 215 is also being multicasted to a delay buffer 315. When the video/audio is stored on a delay buffer 315, a directory on the delay buffer 315 provides a cross reference between the network address of the app/game server 321-325 that is the source of the delayed video/audio and the location on the delay buffer 315 where the delayed video/audio can be found.


Graphics Processing in One Embodiment of an Online Game System

For low latency applications such as video games, it is critical that graphics operations proceed as efficiently as possible. However, attempts to speed the graphics rendering process may result in undesirable visual artifacts such as “tearing” in which information from two or more different frames is shown on a display device in a single screen draw. The embodiments of the invention described below provide a variety of techniques for improving the efficiency of graphics rendering while at the same time reducing these undesirable visual artifacts.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, in one embodiment, each application/game server 321 is equipped with a central processing unit (CPU) 401 for executing video game program code 418 stored in memory 403 and a graphics processing unit (GPU) for executing graphics commands to render the video game output 408. The architectures of the CPU and GPU are well known and, as such, a detailed description of these units and the instructions/commands executed by these units will not be provided herein. Briefly, the GPU is capable of processing a library of graphics commands as specified by one or more graphics application programming interfaces (APIs) such as Open GL or Direct 3D. The program code for executing these graphics APIs is represented in FIG. 4 as graphics engine 430. As the CPU processes the video game program code 418 it hands off graphics commands specified by the API to the GPU which executes the commands and generates the video output 408. It should be noted, however, that the underling principles of the invention are not limited to any particular graphics standard.


In one embodiment, both the CPU and GPU are pipelined processors, meaning that a set of data processing stages are connected in series within the CPU and GPU, so that the output of one stage is the input of the next one. By way of example, the CPU pipeline typically includes an instruction fetch stage, an instruction decode stage, an execution stage and a retirement stage, each of which may have multiple sub-stages. A GPU pipeline may have many more stages including, by way of example and not limitation, transformation, vertex lighting, viewing transformation, primitive generation, project transformation, clipping, viewport transformation, rasterization, texturing, fragment shading and display. These pipeline stages are well understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and will not be described in detail herein. The elements of a pipeline are often executed in parallel or in time-sliced fashion and some amount of queuing storage is often required between stages of the pipeline.


Each of the above stages and the queuing required between the stages adds a certain amount of latency to the execution of graphics commands. The embodiments of the invention below provide techniques for minimizing this latency. Reducing latency is important because it expands the markets in which a device can be used. Moreover, the manufacturer of a device may not have control over significant sources of latency. For example, a user may attach a high latency television to a video game console or a multimedia device may be used remotely (e.g., online video games, a medical device controlled over the internet or military devices engaging targets on the front line while the operator remains safely behind the lines).


As illustrated in FIG. 4, one embodiment of the invention includes a back buffer 405 and a front buffer 406 for storing video game image frames generated by the graphics engine 430 as the user plays a video game. Each “frame” is comprised of a set of pixel data representing one screen image of the video game. In operation, each frame is created in the back buffer as graphics commands are executed using graphics data. When a frame has been completed in the back buffer, it is transferred to the front buffer 406 from where it is scanned out line by line to create the uncompressed video output 408. The scan-out process may occur at a predetermined standard frequency (e.g., such as 60 Hz or 120 Hz as implemented on standard CRT or LCD monitors). The uncompressed video output 408 may then be compressed using the various advanced low latency video compression techniques described in the co-pending applications. Of course, the frame buffer doesn't need to be scanned out of the video card (e.g., via a digital video interface (DVI)) as implied above. It may be transferred directly to the compression hardware, for example over the application server's internal bus (e.g., a PCI Express bus). The frame buffer may be copied in memory either by one of the CPUs or GPUs. The compression hardware may be (by way of example and not limitation) the CPU, the GPU, hardware installed in the server, and/or hardware on the GPU card.



FIG. 5 shows an asynchronous pipeline with queues (Q12, Q23, Q34) between each processing stage (P1, P2, P3, P4) to hold the data produced by the previous stage before it's consumed by the next stage. In one embodiment of the invention, the various stages described herein are stages within the GPU 402. The latency of such a pipeline is the sum of the time the data spends being transformed in each stage (Tp1, Tp2, Tp3) plus the time the data spends sitting in each queue (Tq1, Tq2, Tq3).


The obvious first step to minimizing latency is to minimize the queues or even get rid of them entirely. One common way to do this is to synchronize the pipeline stages as per FIG. 6. Every stage operates simultaneously on different sets of data. When all stages are ready, they all pass their data to the next stage in the pipeline. Queuing becomes trivial and will no longer be shown in the figures. Latency of a synchronized pipeline is the number of stages times the time for the slowest stage to complete.


This slowest stage in the pipeline is the bottleneck, P4 in all figures. This stage is often a fixed feature of the device over which a designer has no control. FIG. 7 shows the dataflow downstream from the bottleneck stage. Notice there is no need for queuing or synchronization. Latency is the sum of the time it takes to complete each stage. Latency cannot be lower than this.


This inspires a method for minimizing the latency of pipeline stages upstream from the bottleneck as per FIG. 8. If the first pipeline stage knows exactly how long every pipeline stage will take and when the bottleneck stage will request new data, it can predict when to begin producing new data that will be ready just in time for the bottleneck stage. As such, in one embodiment, the first pipeline stage may throttle down its clock to slow down data processing based on when the new data will be needed by the bottleneck stage. This technique may be referred to as a phase locked pipeline. The total latency is the sum of the times for each pipeline stage.


Another embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 9 in which the bottleneck stage is artificially moved to the first pipeline stage by slowing the first pipeline stage down to be slightly slower than the actual bottleneck stage. The box labeled 5 in P1 starts after box 3 in P4. Box 4 in P1 should also be slightly lower than the top of box 2 in P4. This is common practice in video games where the bottleneck stage is the physical connection between the computer and the monitor. One drawback in FIG. 9 is there must be some latency inducing queuing (not shown) between stages P3 and P4. Another drawback is that the latency experienced by the user may drift over time, decreasing steadily and then suddenly increasing only to begin decreasing again. It may also result in dropped frames. Developers often minimize dropped frames by driving the first stage at a rate as close to the bottleneck rate as possible. However, this rate is often not known exactly. If the first stage is driven even slightly faster than the bottleneck rate, the queues in the system will fill and stall the upstream stages. Ironically, attempting to minimize latency using this method risks maximizing it.


In one embodiment of the invention, shown in FIG. 10, the first stage is limited to be the same rate as the bottleneck stage. The tops of the numbered boxes in P1 should be the distance apart as the tops of the boxes in P4. The rates at which P1 is producing frames exactly matches the rate at which P4 is consuming them. Feedback is necessarily provided from the bottleneck stage to the first stage to ensure the rates match exactly. Every stage provides feedback including but not limited to the time required to operate on the data and time spent queued. The phase locking component maintains statistical information on each stage and can accurately predict with a predetermined confidence level that the data will be ready when the bottleneck stage requires it with a minimum amount of queuing. Note that a universal clock is not necessary in this embodiment. The phase locking component only requires relative times. As such, the pipeline stages may use different clocks. In fact, the clocks may be in separate physical devices that could potentially be thousands of miles apart. In summary, in this embodiment of the invention, a bottleneck phase is identified based on timing constraints. Feedback is then provided to upstream stages from the bottleneck phase to allow the upstream stages to match the bottleneck stage rate precisely. The phase of the upstream stages is adjusted to minimize time wasted in queues.


The preceding figures illustrated lightweight applications. These are inefficient because the hardware sits around idle most of the time. One embodiment of the invention which forms a less expensive design is one which dedicates the minimum hardware resources to each stage but still guarantees that each stage is faster than the bottleneck stage, as illustrated in FIG. 11. In this case, the phase locking method gains very little over a fully synchronized pipeline as per FIG. 6. Another example is computer games that render more polygons with higher resolution textures, more anti-aliasing, special effects until the frame rate starts to drop.


This embodiment leads directly to another embodiment of the invention in which advanced graphics is implemented using minimal hardware, but with low latency. In this embodiment, the video stream is subdivided into two logical parts which may be processed independently: (a) a resource light, latency critical part, and (b) a resource heavy, latency tolerant part. These two parts can be combined in a hybrid system as illustrated in FIG. 12. One specific example (of many possible) would be a computer game known as a “first person shooter” in which a user navigates around from the perspective of a game character in a 3-dimensional world. With this type of game, rendering the background and non-player characters is resource heavy and latency tolerant, denoted in FIG. 12 with a “b” for “background,” while rendering the image of the player's character is made resource light and latency-intolerant (i.e., because anything less than very low latency performance will result in an undesirable user experience), denoted in FIG. 12 with an “a” for “avatar.” When the user pulls the trigger, he expects to see his weapon to fire immediately. In the specific embodiment illustrated, the game is implemented on a personal computer with a central processing unit (CPU) as stage P1 and a graphics processing unit (GPU) as stage P2. The monitor, represented as P3, is the bottleneck stage. “Monitor,” in the case, means any device that consumes the uncompressed video stream. Which could be the compressing hardware.


In this embodiment, the CPU completes its work on the background image, represented by 3b, before completing its work on avatar image, represented by 2a. Nonetheless, to reduce latency associated with the avatar, the GPU processes 2a ahead of 3b, rendering the avatar 2a on a previously rendered background 2b (to render the motion of the avatar as efficiently as possible) outputs that frame, and then immediately begins rendering the background of the next frame, represented by 3b. The GPU may sit idle for a short time waiting for data from the CPU to complete the next frame. In this embodiment, the CPU sits idle waiting for the phase lock to signal that it's time to make a list of drawing commands for the user's avatar and pass it on to the GPU. The CPU then immediately begins to draw the background of a new frame but it can't be the next frame because the GPU will start drawing the next frame. There's no way the CPU will have the next frame ready in time. Therefore, the CPU must start drawing the background for the frame after the next. This situation is similar to the operation of a synchronized pipeline as illustrated in FIG. 6.


This one frame phase difference between the avatar and the background is, in most cases, acceptable to the user. However, in cases where highest possible quality is desired, the following additional techniques may be employed. The high latency path predicts the inputs to generate the data. In the first person shooter example, the location of the camera is predicted ahead of time. When the output of the high and low latency paths are combined, the output of the high latency path (e.g., the background) is modified to more closely match what would have been generated using the actual inputs instead of the predicted inputs. In the first person shooter example, the background would be translated, scaled, and/or rotated in order to match the actual camera position. Note this implies the high latency path would have to render an area somewhat larger than what is actually viewed by the player as illustrated in FIG. 13, which shows an actual camera location 1301, a predicted camera location 1302, an actual background 1303 and a rendered background 1304. Thus, if a user is playing a game in which a character is running at a tree, every frame the tree gets a little closer, meaning bigger. The user shoots a gun which hits the tree. In the hybrid scenario the tree is lagging behind the shot by one frame. So things might look “wrong” for a frame (i.e., the shot will look like it missed). To compensate, the described embodiments of the invention enlarge the tree to approximate what it would look like in the frame in which the shot was fired.


As another example, when a user is playing a first person shooter video game and pushes the fire button, the user wants to immediately see flames coming out of the gun. Thus, in one embodiment, the program draws the firing gun on top of a previously rendered background and the game times it so that the frame is done just in time to be picked up by the next stage in the pipeline (which is the dvi output (vsync) or the encoder input or some other bottleneck). Then the game draws its best guess at what the background should be for the next frame. If the guess is poor, then one embodiment modifies the background to more closely match what it would have been if the it had been rendered from the correct camera position. Thus, the technique shown in FIG. 13 is a simple affine warp. More sophisticated techniques employed in other embodiments use the z-buffer to do a better job.


In one embodiment, the various functional modules illustrated herein and the associated steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.


In one embodiment, the modules may be implemented on a programmable digital signal processor (“DSP”) such as a Texas Instruments' TMS320x architecture (e.g., a TMS320C6000, TMS320C5000, . . . etc). Various different DSPs may be used while still complying with these underlying principles.


Embodiments may include various steps as set forth above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform certain steps. Various elements which are not relevant to these underlying principles such as computer memory, hard drive, input devices, have been left out of some or all of the figures to avoid obscuring the pertinent aspects.


Elements of the disclosed subject matter may also be provided as a machine-readable medium for storing the machine-executable instructions. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, flash memory, optical disks, CD-ROMs, DVD ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, propagation media or other type of machine-readable media suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, the present invention may be downloaded as a computer program which may be transferred from a remote computer (e.g., a server) to a requesting computer (e.g., a client) by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).


It should also be understood that elements of the disclosed subject matter may also be provided as a computer program product which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (e.g., a processor or other electronic device) to perform a sequence of operations. Alternatively, the operations may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, propagation media or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. For example, elements of the disclosed subject matter may be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer or electronic device to a requesting process by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection).


Additionally, although the disclosed subject matter has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, numerous modifications and alterations are well within the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A computer implemented method for efficiently processing a video stream with a processor pipeline having a plurality of pipeline stages, comprising: identifying a bottleneck stage within the processor pipeline, the bottleneck stage having a first clock and processing frames of the video stream;receiving a feedback signal from the bottleneck stage at one or more upstream stages, at least one of the upstream stages having a second clock, the feedback signal including information as to time required by the bottleneck stage to operate on data and information as to time the data spent queued; andresponsively adjusting the speed at which the one or more upstream stages are processing frames of the video stream to approximate the speed at which the bottleneck stage is processing the frames of the video stream, wherein the speed is adjusted, at least in part, by modifying a frequency of the second clock.
  • 2. The method as in claim 1 wherein the processor pipeline includes one or more stages within a central processor unit (CPU) and one or more stages within a graphics processing unit (GPU).
  • 3. The method as in claim 1 wherein the video stream is generated by program code of a video game being played by a user.
  • 4. The method as in claim 3 wherein the video game is executed on a hosting server, wherein the user plays the video game from a client computer, and wherein the pipeline stages are stages within the hosting server.
  • 5. A method, comprising operations of: identifying a bottleneck stage within a processor pipeline with a plurality of pipeline stages, wherein the bottleneck stage has a first clock and processes frames of a video stream;receiving a feedback signal from the bottleneck stage at one or more upstream stages, wherein at least one of the upstream stages has a second clock and wherein the feedback signal includes information as to time required by the bottleneck stage to operate on data and information as to time the data spent queued; andresponsively adjusting the speed at which the one or more upstream stages are processing frames of the video stream to approximate the speed at which the bottleneck stage is processing the frames of the video stream, wherein the speed is adjusted, at least in part, by modifying a frequency of the second clock, and wherein each of the operations is performed by hardware components that contain hardwired logic.
  • 6. The method as in claim 1, wherein the processor pipeline includes one or more stages within a central processor unit (CPU) and one or more stages within a graphics processing unit (GPU).
  • 7. The method as in claim 1, wherein the video stream is generated by program code of a video game being played by a user.
  • 8. The method as in claim 7, wherein the video game is executed on a hosting server, wherein the user plays the video game from a client computer, and wherein the pipeline stages are stages within the hosting server.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/538,077, filed Aug. 7, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,138,644 entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATED MACHINE SWITCHING, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/210,888, filed, Mar. 23, 2009, and is a continuation-in-part (CIP) application of Ser. No. 10/315,460 filed Dec. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,849,491 entitled, “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS VIDEO GAMING”, which is assigned to the assignee of the present CIP application.

US Referenced Citations (332)
Number Name Date Kind
4539706 Mears et al. Sep 1985 A
4573074 Alaria et al. Feb 1986 A
4616263 Eichelberger Oct 1986 A
5058199 Grube Oct 1991 A
5129096 Burns Jul 1992 A
5185599 Doornink et al. Feb 1993 A
5222246 Wolkstein Jun 1993 A
5357604 San et al. Oct 1994 A
5408679 Masuda Apr 1995 A
5493644 Thayer et al. Feb 1996 A
5509028 Marque-Pucheu Apr 1996 A
5558339 Perlman Sep 1996 A
5586247 Yoshifuji et al. Dec 1996 A
5586257 Perlman Dec 1996 A
5599232 Darling Feb 1997 A
5603012 Sotheran Feb 1997 A
5608412 Welles, II et al. Mar 1997 A
5618045 Kagan et al. Apr 1997 A
5640386 Wiedeman Jun 1997 A
5642171 Baumgartner et al. Jun 1997 A
5646676 Dewkett et al. Jul 1997 A
5654747 Ottesen et al. Aug 1997 A
5682204 Uz et al. Oct 1997 A
5710719 Houle Jan 1998 A
5732076 Ketseoglou et al. Mar 1998 A
5742289 Naylor et al. Apr 1998 A
5742680 Wilson Apr 1998 A
5751378 Chen et al. May 1998 A
5790176 Craig Aug 1998 A
5815146 Youden et al. Sep 1998 A
5828370 Moeller et al. Oct 1998 A
5870665 Uchikawa Feb 1999 A
5872575 Segal Feb 1999 A
5884101 Wu Mar 1999 A
5890055 Chu et al. Mar 1999 A
5915020 Tilford et al. Jun 1999 A
5926208 Noonen et al. Jul 1999 A
5956088 Shen et al. Sep 1999 A
5959592 Petruzzelli Sep 1999 A
5974503 Venkatesh et al. Oct 1999 A
5987376 Olson et al. Nov 1999 A
5999808 LaDue Dec 1999 A
6009060 Kim Dec 1999 A
6052814 Karasawa Apr 2000 A
6057847 Jenkins May 2000 A
6057850 Kichury May 2000 A
6092117 Gladwin et al. Jul 2000 A
6110041 Walker et al. Aug 2000 A
6115369 Oura Sep 2000 A
6132306 Trompower Oct 2000 A
6148142 Anderson Nov 2000 A
6160993 Wilson Dec 2000 A
6166703 Muterspaugh Dec 2000 A
6175854 Bretscher Jan 2001 B1
6188571 Roganti et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205185 Kajiwara Mar 2001 B1
6241612 Heredia Jun 2001 B1
6263503 Margulis Jul 2001 B1
6292589 Chow et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292847 Nishimoto et al. Sep 2001 B1
6307567 Cohen-Or Oct 2001 B1
6323909 Michener et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331856 Van Hook et al. Dec 2001 B1
6347216 Marko et al. Feb 2002 B1
6397038 Green, Sr. et al. May 2002 B1
6404775 Leslie et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409602 Wiltshire et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412112 Barrett et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414725 Clarin Jul 2002 B1
6421385 Uenoyama et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424817 Hadden et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430233 Dillon et al. Aug 2002 B1
6466248 Spann et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473858 Shimomura et al. Oct 2002 B1
6585596 Leifer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594313 Hazra et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597891 Tantawy et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600730 Davis et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614768 Mahany et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631410 Kowalski et al. Oct 2003 B1
6650869 Kelly et al. Nov 2003 B2
6664969 Emerson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665872 Krishnamurthy et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667944 Monden et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671186 Kopf Dec 2003 B2
6678502 Sugaya et al. Jan 2004 B1
6684058 Karacaoglu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690657 Lau et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690726 Yavits et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690926 Tawil et al. Feb 2004 B2
6721280 Mauro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6724826 Varian Apr 2004 B1
6728541 Ohkura et al. Apr 2004 B2
6741841 Mitchell May 2004 B1
6745050 Forsythe et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754241 Krishnamurthy et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757913 Knox Jun 2004 B2
6760487 Linares Jul 2004 B1
6785262 Yao et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788882 Geer et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792615 Rowe et al. Sep 2004 B1
6810528 Chatani Oct 2004 B1
6811113 Silansky et al. Nov 2004 B1
6820218 Barga et al. Nov 2004 B1
6830515 Rowe Dec 2004 B2
6832071 Nakamura et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836658 Sharon et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842617 Williams et al. Jan 2005 B2
6845090 Takabatake et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850285 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853197 McFarland et al. Feb 2005 B1
6856786 Belostotsky et al. Feb 2005 B2
6859498 Choi Feb 2005 B1
6873654 Rackett Mar 2005 B1
6886029 Pecus et al. Apr 2005 B1
6908390 Nguyen et al. Jun 2005 B2
6925285 Kim Aug 2005 B2
6947044 Kulas Sep 2005 B1
6963353 Firestone Nov 2005 B1
6968153 Heinonen et al. Nov 2005 B1
6973667 Fritsch et al. Dec 2005 B2
6993353 Desai et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996742 Lerman et al. Feb 2006 B2
7016419 Tardif Mar 2006 B2
7028304 Weinberger et al. Apr 2006 B1
7072627 Coffin, III Jul 2006 B2
7089319 Lysenko et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099388 Cooper Aug 2006 B2
7155515 Brown et al. Dec 2006 B1
7158679 Sano et al. Jan 2007 B2
7215660 Perlman May 2007 B2
7219153 Day May 2007 B1
7244181 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B2
7263125 Lainema Aug 2007 B2
7272613 Sim et al. Sep 2007 B2
7289478 Kim et al. Oct 2007 B1
7295614 Shen et al. Nov 2007 B1
7299487 Campbell et al. Nov 2007 B1
7340764 Kubota et al. Mar 2008 B2
7359004 Yu et al. Apr 2008 B2
7423990 Kelton et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430187 Holt et al. Sep 2008 B2
7461161 Horiguchi Dec 2008 B2
7471665 Perlman Dec 2008 B2
7477688 Zhang et al. Jan 2009 B1
7493078 Perlman Feb 2009 B2
7502849 Roberts et al. Mar 2009 B2
7543326 Moni Jun 2009 B2
7548657 Deaven Jun 2009 B2
7558525 Perlman Jul 2009 B2
7567527 Perlman Jul 2009 B2
7587520 Kent et al. Sep 2009 B1
7590084 Perlman Sep 2009 B2
7593361 Perlman Sep 2009 B2
7680038 Gourlay Mar 2010 B1
7684752 Perlman Mar 2010 B2
7702006 Kunii et al. Apr 2010 B2
7715336 Perlman May 2010 B2
7738391 Melpignano et al. Jun 2010 B2
7841946 Walker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848409 Wang et al. Dec 2010 B2
7878908 Sloate et al. Feb 2011 B2
7916147 Clemie et al. Mar 2011 B2
7936376 Fukuhara May 2011 B2
8147339 Perry Apr 2012 B1
20010007575 Mori et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010024974 Cohen Sep 2001 A1
20010034743 Thomas Oct 2001 A1
20020004838 Hakenberg Jan 2002 A1
20020009149 Rodriguez et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015513 Ando et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020019984 Rakib Feb 2002 A1
20020028655 Rosener et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020034980 Lemmons et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038459 Talmola et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020046285 Yasushi et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020056120 McTernan et al. May 2002 A1
20020059614 Lipsanen et al. May 2002 A1
20020059637 Rakib May 2002 A1
20020061743 Hutcheson et al. May 2002 A1
20020068592 Hutcheson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020069265 Bountour et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020071658 Marko et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072329 Bandeira et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073429 Beane et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020075382 Cohen Jun 2002 A1
20020080267 Moluf Jun 2002 A1
20020106019 Chaddha et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020106119 Foran et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020114330 Cheung et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115409 Khayrallah Aug 2002 A1
20020118758 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128065 Chung et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133491 Sim et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020149617 Becker Oct 2002 A1
20020152303 Dispensa Oct 2002 A1
20020154055 Davis et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020157115 Lu Oct 2002 A1
20020165927 Theriault et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020166119 Cristofalo Nov 2002 A1
20020170065 Pinnick Nov 2002 A1
20020181189 Yang Dec 2002 A1
20020181190 Callado Dec 2002 A1
20020184303 Uner Dec 2002 A1
20020184314 Riise Dec 2002 A1
20020188955 Thompson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030009535 Apostolopulos Jan 2003 A1
20030017846 Estevez et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030037156 Mallart Feb 2003 A1
20030048808 Stahl et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030054827 Schmidl et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056168 Krishnamachari et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065805 Barnes, Jr. Apr 2003 A1
20030078103 LeMay et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079016 Tsao Apr 2003 A1
20030124977 Smith et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135860 Dureau Jul 2003 A1
20030139150 Rodriguez et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030158700 Forler et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030177187 Levine et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181162 Matula Sep 2003 A1
20030181229 Forster et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030207684 Wesel Nov 2003 A1
20030216144 Roese et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220072 Coffin, III Nov 2003 A1
20030226149 Chun et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229719 Iwata et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030234804 Parker et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040003104 Boskovic et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040025190 McCalla et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034865 Barrett et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040043819 Willis Mar 2004 A1
20040048669 Rowe Mar 2004 A1
20040052371 Watanabe Mar 2004 A1
20040057516 Kim et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064504 Domschitz Apr 2004 A1
20040080533 Nishtala et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093372 Chen et al. May 2004 A1
20040094194 Aldoretta et al. May 2004 A1
20040097288 Sloate et al. May 2004 A1
20040102245 Escalera et al. May 2004 A1
20040110469 Judd et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111755 Perlman Jun 2004 A1
20040114576 Itoh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125820 Rios Jul 2004 A1
20040153764 Paradkar Aug 2004 A1
20040153933 Ejima et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040203694 Wong et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204102 Kuehnel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224769 Hansen Nov 2004 A1
20050047496 McIntire et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050100100 Unger May 2005 A1
20050104889 Clemie et al. May 2005 A1
20050135480 Li et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147164 Wu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050183120 Jain et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188073 Nakamichi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050201460 Kang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050286448 Proctor et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060029065 Fellman Feb 2006 A1
20060069623 MacDonald Korth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078046 Lu Apr 2006 A1
20060078051 Liang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098592 Proctor, Jr. et al. May 2006 A1
20060111186 Hattori May 2006 A1
20060116208 Chen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060117344 Lamkin et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060117371 Margulis Jun 2006 A1
20060133513 Kounnas Jun 2006 A1
20060136569 Tenhunen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146830 Lin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060148571 Hossack et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060150055 Quinard et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060154710 Serafat Jul 2006 A1
20060183421 Proctor et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195884 van Zoest et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060224761 Howarth et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060230428 Craig et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242240 Parker et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060258463 Cugno et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070009015 Kunii et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070009029 Craig et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025631 Kim et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047901 Ando et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070058937 Ando et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073779 Walker et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070094700 Wolfe Apr 2007 A1
20070121629 Cuijpers et al. May 2007 A1
20070147514 Yamaguchi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156815 Mate et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070165035 Duluk et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183493 Kimpe Aug 2007 A1
20070202941 Miltenberger et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206673 Cipolli et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226364 Landspurg Sep 2007 A1
20070260492 Feied et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260677 DeMarco et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271358 Gaddy Nov 2007 A1
20070297509 Mizobuchi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080008276 Yokoyama Jan 2008 A1
20080025196 Karaoguz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080032794 Ware et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045338 Walker et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080207322 Mizrahi Aug 2008 A1
20080211901 Civanlar et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080220878 Michaelis Sep 2008 A1
20080225735 Qiu et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247463 Buttimer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268947 Fyock et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276269 Miller et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298376 Takeda et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090003452 Au et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090006736 Pantos Jan 2009 A1
20090028230 Leitner Jan 2009 A1
20090109988 Musunuri et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090144425 Marr et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090144792 Fielibert et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198606 Craig et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100035691 Wild et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100064002 Levanon et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100080292 Coulombe Apr 2010 A1
20100111410 Iu et al. May 2010 A1
20100124274 Cheok et al. May 2010 A1
20100150231 Huang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100226262 Liu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248843 Karsten Sep 2010 A1
20100250770 Barreto et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110039612 Pececnik Feb 2011 A1
20110157197 Clemie et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110228845 Banerjee Sep 2011 A1
20120075317 Clemie et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120198510 Stoneback Aug 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
0554586 Dec 1992 EP
1094642 Apr 2001 EP
1104686 Jun 2001 EP
1130920 Sep 2001 EP
1202472 May 2002 EP
1837060 Sep 2007 EP
96-11928 Dec 2006 IL
09-212661 Aug 1997 JP
2001111575 Apr 2001 JP
2001244864 Sep 2001 JP
20020092022 Dec 2002 KR
WO-9641479 Dec 1996 WO
WO-9742766 Nov 1997 WO
WO-0050971 Aug 2000 WO
WO-0141447 Jun 2001 WO
WO-02060183 Aug 2002 WO
WO-02078369 Oct 2002 WO
WO-03032666 Apr 2003 WO
WO-03047710 Jun 2003 WO
WO-03075116 Sep 2003 WO
WO-2006134055 Dec 2006 WO
WO-2007130012 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2010141492 Dec 2010 WO
WO-2010141522 Dec 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (59)
Entry
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,171, Sep. 1, 2010, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,086, mailed Oct. 7, 2010, 10 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,076 mailed Oct. 12, 2011, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,229, mailed Oct. 26, 2011. 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,218, mailed Sep. 13, 2011. 9 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,090, mailed Jan. 26, 2012, 12 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Dec. 13, 2011, 13 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Apr. 11, 2011, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,127, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,140, mailed Mar. 29, 2011. 6 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,171, mailed May 9, 2011, 18 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,187, mailed Mar. 29, 2011. 7 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,187, mailed Feb. 14, 2012. 9 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077 mailed Aug. 12, 2011, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,226, mailed Apr. 3, 2012, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,227, mailed Apr. 10, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,150, mailed Mar. 23, 2012, 12 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,140, mailed Mar. 20, 2012, 13 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,041, mailed Mar. 19, 2012, 9 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,233, mailed Apr. 20, 2012, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,054, mailed Jan. 18, 2012, 12 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,062, mailed May 10, 2012, 13 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,096, mailed Jun. 26, 2012, 13 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,218, mailed Jun. 25, 2012, 26 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,076, mailed Jun. 25, 2012, 21 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,229, mailed Oct. 5, 2012, 2011, 15 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,054, mailed Aug. 24, 21 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,041, mailed Sep. 19, 2012, 17 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,154 mailed Aug. 28, 2012, 28 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,090, mailed Dec. 4, 2012, 22 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,127, mailed Jan. 9, 2013, 30 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,227, mailed Dec. 11, 2012, 18 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,233, mailed Jan. 28, 2013, 31 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,096, mailed Dec. 13, 2012, 18 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077, mailed Jun. 19, 2013, 19 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for foreign counterpart PCT Application No. PCT/US13/33744 mailed Sep. 30, 2013, 12 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,077, mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 33 pages.
“Accelerated Graphics Port Interfaces Specification”, Intel Corporation, Revision 1.0, Jul. 31, 1996, 161 pages.
“IP Multicast Technical Overview”, Cisco Systems, Aug. 2007., 9.
Boulware, Jack , “Power Houses”, “Wired”, Nov. 2002, Issue 10.11, Wired Digital, Inc., 8 pages, (Nov. 2002).
Bronez, Thomas , et al., “Shipboard experiments for a multishop 802.11 communications system—RF channel characterization and MAC performance measurement”, Military Communications Conference, 2005. MILCOM 2005. IEEE. The MITRE Corporation Mclean, VA., (2005), 7 pages.
Bungie, “HALO 3 How-to: Saved Films, New ViDOC”, http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link=h3savedfilms, Sep. 20, 2007, pp. 1-8.
Dickinson, Patrick, “Instant Replay: Building a Game Engine with Reproducible Behavior”, http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3057/instant—replay—building—a—game.php?print, pp. 1-6.
Duong, Ta Nguyen Binh, “A Dynamic Load Sharing Algorithm for Massively Multiplayer Online Games:”, IEEE, 2003, pp. 131-136.
Everitt, C., “Projective Texture Mapping” nVidia white paper last updated Apr. 24, 2001, 7 pages.
Frauenfelder, M., “G-Cluster Makes Games to Go”, The Feature: It's All About the Mobile Internet, http://www.thefeaturearchives.com/13267.html, 3 pages, 2001.
IDS and characterization of references submitted by Inventor in related applications, 7 pages, May 24, 2013.
Laulajainen, J., et al., “Experiments with QOS-Aware Gaming-on-Demand Service” Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2006, vol. 1, Apr. 18, 2006, pp. 805-810, XP010915314, DOI: 10.1109/AINA.2006.175, ISBN: 978-0-7695-2466-5.
Jarvinen, S., et al., “QoS-Aware real-time video encoding How to Improve the User Experience of a Gaming-on-Demand Service”, Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 2, Jan. 8, 2006, pp. 994-997, XP010893324, DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2006.1593.
Kubota, Shuji, “High-Quality Frame-Synchronization for Satellite Video Signal Transmission”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 430-440.
Levoy, M., “Polygon-Assisted JPEG and MPEG Compression of Synthetic Images”, Computer and Graphics Proceedings, Los Angeles, Aug. 6-11, 1995, Computer Graphics Proceedings (SIGGRAPH), New York, IEEE, US., pp. 21-28.
Nguyen, Cong Duc, “Optimal Assignment of Distributed Servers to Virtual Partitions for the Provision of Immersive Voice Communication in Massively Multiplayer Games”, Computer Communications 29 2006, available online Nov. 15, 2005, pp. 1260-1270.
Perry, David , U.S. Appl. No. 61/014,036, filed Dec. 15, 2007, entitled, “Systems and Methods of Serving Game Video”, 39 pages.
Yoon, et al., “Web Based remote rendering with IBRAC (Image-based rendering acceleration and compression)”, European Association for Computer Graphics, 21 Annual Conference, Eurographics, Interlaken, Switzerlmand, Aug. 21-25, 2000, 10 pages.
Wallach, D., et al., “Accelerated MPEG Compression of Dynamic Polygonal Scens”, computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, SIGGRAPH, Jul. 24, 1994, pp. 193-196.
Wu, Dapeng, “Transporting Real-time Video over the Internet: Challenges and Approaches”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-18.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/033744, mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 7 pages.
Taiwan App. No. 102110747, Search Report, Feb. 18, 2016.
Sheaffer, et al., “A Flexible Simulation Framework for Graphics Architectures”, HWWS '04 Proc of the ACM Siggraph/Eurographics Conf., The Eurographics Assn. 2004.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120299940 A1 Nov 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61210888 Mar 2009 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12538077 Aug 2009 US
Child 13430269 US
Parent 10315460 Dec 2002 US
Child 12538077 US