SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMU MOTION DETECTION UTILIZING STANDARD DEVIATION

Abstract

In an example embodiment, motion is detected with an IMU utilizing standard deviation. Specifically, an IMU may obtains IMU measurements. An IMU motion detection process may accumulate a particular number of IMU measurements over a time interval to calculate an absolute magnitude of earth rate (ERimu) value and an absolute magnitude of normal gravity value (GNimu). The values calculated may be referred to as a sample. The IMU motion detection process may create sample rolling histories based on a particular number of samples, e.g., consecutive samples. The IMU motion detection process may then calculate standard deviation values for a sample rolling history based on the ERimu and GNimu values included in the sample rolling history. The IMU motion detection process may compare the standard deviation values to respective motion threshold values, which may be adaptive, to determine if a body of interest, e.g., vehicle, is moving or is stationary.

Description

BACKGROUND

Technical Field

The invention relates generally to inertial measurement units (IMUs), and in particular, to a system and method for IMU motion detection utilizing standard deviation.

Background Information

With high grade inertial measurement units (IMUs), the absolute magnitude of earth rate and normal gravity computed directly from IMU measurements can be compared to threshold values of an inertial navigation system (INS) to accurately detect motion, where the threshold values may be set based on the biases and errors associated with the high grade IMUs. With low grade IMUs, e.g., consumer grade IMUs, which introduce larger biases and errors, the thresholds must be increased. Thus, if a vehicle to which the IMU is coupled is moving along slowly (e.g., creeping), the INS may incorrectly determine that the vehicle is stationary because the computed absolute magnitude of earth rate and normal gravity may not exceed the bumped up or increased thresholds. As such, convergence to solve for the biases and errors to reach steady-state may take longer with low grade IMUs.

SUMMARY

Techniques are provided for inertial measurement unit (IMU) motion detection utilizing standard deviation. IMU measurements, e.g., delta angles and delta velocities, are provided to an inertial navigation system (INS). An IMU motion detection process of the INS may accumulate a particular number of the IMU measurements over a time interval, e.g., 1 second, to calculate an absolute magnitude of earth rate (ER_imu) value and an absolute magnitude of normal gravity (GN_imu) value. The ER_imu value and GN_imu value calculated over the time interval are together hereinafter referred to as a sample.

The IMU motion detection process may then create sample rolling histories based on a particular number of samples, such as consecutive samples. For example, if the particular number, e.g., window size, is 5, the IMU motion detection process may create 5-sample rolling histories. The motion detection process may then calculate standard deviation values, e.g., ER_detection value and GN_detection value, for each created sample rolling history utilizing the ER_imu values and GN_imu values of the sample rolling history.

The motion detection process may then compare the standard deviations values, e.g., ER_detection value and the GN_detection value, for a sample rolling history to respective motion threshold values, which may be preconfigured and/or adaptive, to determine whether motion is detected. Specifically, when both the ER_detection value and the GN_detection value for a sample rolling history are less than or equal to the respective motion threshold values, the IMU motion detection process may determine that the system, e.g., a vehicle, to which the IMU is coupled is stationary. However, when either of the ER_detection value or the GN_detection value for the sample rolling history is greater than the respective threshold value, the IMU motion detection process may determine that the system to which the IMU is coupled is moving.

By utilizing the standard deviation, (i.e., relative variation, of the ER_imu values and GN_imu values) to detect motion according to the one or more embodiments described herein, more sensitive threshold values may be utilized than the threshold values (i.e., bumped up or increased threshold values) utilized by traditional motion detection systems that use an IMU. Advantageously, the one or more embodiments describes herein may utilize a consumer grade IMU to detect motion of a vehicle that is moving along slowly (e.g., creeping), which in turn allows for reduced convergence time.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a system according to one or more embodiments described herein;

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram for IMU motion detection utilizing standard deviation according to one or more embodiments described herein; and

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram for utilizing adaptive threshold values for IMU motion detection that utilizes standard deviation according to one or more embodiments described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

Referring to FIG. 1, a system 100 includes a body of interest, i.e. vehicle, 102 capable of moving. Coupled to the vehicle may be a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver 104, an inertial navigation system (INS) 110, and an antenna 106. The antenna 106, coupled to the vehicle and in communication with the GNSS receiver 104, may receive one or more satellite signals from one or more GNSS satellites 108. The GNSS receiver 104 may, based on the reception of the satellite signals at the antenna 106, produce GNSS raw measurements, such as pseudoranges, carrier phases, and Doppler velocities; GNSS position, velocity and time, position covariance, and velocity covariance; and, as appropriate, GNSS observables. The GNSS raw measurements, GNSS position, velocity and time, the position covariance and the velocity covariance and the GNSS observables are hereinafter referred to collectively as “GNSS measurement information.”

The INS 110 includes an inertial measurement unit (IMU) 112 that reads data from sensors (e.g., one or more accelerometers and/or gyroscopes) that produces IMU measurements. In an embodiment, the sensors may be orthogonally positioned. An INS filter 113 processes, in a known manner, the GNSS measurement information, when available, and the IMU measurements to produces INS-based position, velocity and attitude. The GNSS receiver 104, INS 110, and IMU 112 may include processors, memory, storage, other hardware, software, and/or firmware (not shown).

In addition, the INS 110 includes an IMU motion detection process 114 that implements one or more embodiment described herein. In an embodiment, the IMU motion detection process 114 may be software and implemented by hardware. In an embodiment, the IMU motion detection process 114 is executed by a processor (not shown).

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a sequence of steps for IMU motion detection utilizing standard deviation. For simplicity purposes, the example values utilized herein may be rounded to a particular number of decimal digits. However, it is expressly contemplated that the one or more embodiments described herein may be implemented using values that are rounded to any number of decimal digits in order to, for example, obtain different precision.

The procedure 200 starts at step 205 and continues to step 210 where the IMU 112 obtains IMU measurements. For example, the IMU 112 may be a 125 Hz IMU and consist of one or more accelerometers and/or gyroscopes, and the errors (e.g., biases, scale factor, non-linearities, etc.) associated with the gyroscopes may, for example, be on the order of several thousand degrees/hr. The IMU measurements may include, but are not limited to, delta angles (Δw) and delta velocities (Δv). In an embodiment, Δw is the delta angle measured+biases at the IMU rate. In an embodiment, Δv is the delta velocity measured+biases at the IMU rate. The biases may be the inherent errors associated with the sensors of the IMU 114 that make the measurements.

For example, the following table shows 10 example Δw and Δv values in the x, y, and, z axis obtained by a consumer grade IMU 112 at different times over the defined time interval:

Time	Δvx	Δvy	Δvz	Δwx	Δwy	Δwz
324300.006	0.00046	0.002097	0.079851	−0.000015	−0.000200	0.000068
324300.014	0.001293	0.001532	0.079823	−0.000017	−0.000296	0.000064
324300.022	0.003361	0.001341	0.078683	−0.000011	−0.000356	0.000068
324300.030	0.003917	0.001494	0.078769	−0.000009	−0.000290	0.000066
324300.038	0.002078	0.001839	0.079315	−0.000002	−0.000194	0.000066
324300.046	0.000441	0.002002	0.079746	−0.000009	−0.000207	0.000070
324300.054	0.001044	0.001925	0.079871	−0.000013	−0.000290	0.000072
324300.062	0.003112	0.001714	0.078875	−0.000009	−0.000352	0.000066
324300.070	0.003812	0.001599	0.07876	−0.000002	−0.000296	0.000070
324300.078	0.002241	0.001695	0.079171	0.000000	−0.000200	0.000064

The unit for Δw may be radians/second/sample rate (rad/s/sample rate) and the units for Δv may be meter/second squared/sample rate (m/s²/sample rate).

The procedure continues to step 215 and the IMU motion detection process 114 accumulates a particular number of IMU measurements over a time interval to calculate an absolute magnitude of earth rate (ER_imu) value and an absolute magnitude of normal gravity (GN_imu) value. For example, the time interval may be 1 second and the IMU motion detection process 114 may accumulate a particular number, e.g., 125, of the IMU measurements over 1 second to calculate the ER_imu value and the GN_imu value that make up a sample. Specifically, the IMU motion detection process 114 may utilize the following formulas to calculate the ER_imu value and the GN_imu value for a sample:

${\mathrm{ER}}_{\mathrm{imu}}={\left({\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta w_x^k-w{\mathrm{bias}}_x\right)\right)}^2+{\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta w_y^k-w{\mathrm{bias}}_y\right)\right)}^2+{\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta w_z^k-w{\mathrm{bias}}_z\right)\right)}^2\right)}^{1\text{/}2}$ ${\mathrm{GN}}_{\mathrm{imu}}={\left({\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta v_x^k-v{\mathrm{bias}}_x\right)\right)}^2+{\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta v_y^k-v{\mathrm{bias}}_y\right)\right)}^2+{\left(\sum _{k=1}^n\left(\Delta v_z^k-v{\mathrm{bias}}_z\right)\right)}^2\right)}^{1\text{/}2}$

where n is the number of IMU measurements (e.g., 125) accumulated over the time interval (e.g., 1 second), Δw_x is the delta angle measured by the IMU 112 in the x axis, wbias_x is the estimated angular rate bias in the x axis, Δw_y is the delta angle measured by the IMU 112 in the y axis, wbias_y is the estimated angular rate bias in the y axis, Δw_z is the delta angle measured by the IMU 112 in the z axis, wbias_z is the estimated angular rate bias in the z axis, Δv_x is the delta velocity measured by the IMU 112 in the x axis, vbias_x is the estimated velocity rate bias in the x axis, Δv_y is the delta velocity measured by the IMU 112 in the y axis, vbias_y is the estimated velocity rate bias in the y axis, Δv_z is the delta velocity measured by the IMU 112 in the z axis, and vbias_z is the estimated velocity rate bias in the z axis.

For this example, and based on particular IMU measurements, the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates, for a first new sample (sample 1′), the ER_imu value to be 0.034641 rad/s (i.e., 7138 deg/hr) and the GN_imu value to be 9.91728 m/s².

The procedure continues to step 220 and the IMU motion detection process 114 creates sample rolling histories based on a particular number of samples, such as a particular number of consecutive samples. For example, the particular number, e.g., window size, may be 5 and the IMU motion detection process 114 may create 5-sample rolling histories. The window size of 5 is for illustrative purposes only, and it is expressly contemplated that the window size may be any value. In this example, let it be assumed that a first 5-sample rolling history (History Epoch 1) is:

History Epoch 1
Sample	GNimu	ERimu
1	9.9175	0.0346
2	9.9145	0.0346
3	9.9144	0.0346
4	9.9180	0.0345
5	9.9159	0.0345

The IMU motion detection process 114 may then create a second 5-sample rolling history (History Epoch 2) by removing the oldest sample (sample 1) from History Epoch 1 and by adding the first new sample, which includes the ER_imu value of 0.034641 rad/s and the GN_imu value of 9.91728 g, to History Epoch 1. As such, the second 5-sample rolling history (History Epoch 2) is:

History Epoch 2
Sample	GNimu	ERimu
2	9.9145	0.0346
3	9.9144	0.0346
4	9.9180	0.0345
5	9.9159	0.0345
1'	9.9173	0.0346

For this example, let it be assumed that the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates, after the first new sample and for a second new sample (sample 2′), the ER_imu value to be 0.0347 rad/s and the GN_imu value to be 9.9178 m/s².

Therefore, the IMU motion detection process 140 may then create a third 5-sample rolling history (History Epoch 3) by removing the oldest sample (sample 2) from History Epoch 2 and by adding the second new sample to History Epoch 2. As such, the third 5-sample rolling history (History Epoch 3) is:

History Epoch 3
Sample	GNimu	ERimu
3	9.9144	0.0346
4	9.9180	0.0345
5	9.9159	0.0345
1'	9.9173	0.0346
2'	9.9178	0.0347

The IMU motion detection process 114 may continue to create sample rolling histories in a similar manner and as new ER_imu values and GN_imu values are calculated over the time interval by the IMU motion detection process 114 for new samples.

The procedure continues to step 225 and the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates, for each sample rolling history, a standard deviation value from the GN_imu values of the sample rolling history and a standard deviation value from the ER_imu values of the sample rolling history.

Specifically, the IMU motion detection process 114 may first calculate a mean value (e.g., GN_mean) from the GN_imu values of the sample rolling history and a mean value (e.g., ER_mean) from the ER_imu values of the sample rolling history. For example, the IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the mean values for History Epoch 1 (GN_mean¹ and ER_mean¹) as follows:

$GN_{mean}^1=\frac{\left(9.9175+9.9145+9.9144+9.9180+9.9159\right)}{5}=9.9160ER_{mean}^1=\frac{\left(0.0346+0.0346+0.0346+0.0345+0.0345\right)}{5}=0.0346$

The IMU motion detection process may then calculate a standard deviation (detection) value (e.g., GN_detection) for the GN_imu values of the sample rolling history and a standard deviation (e.g., ER_detection) value for the ER_imu values of the sample rolling history utilizing the following formula:

$\mathrm{detection}={\left[\frac{\left[{\sum }_{k=1}^n{\left(sample^k-{\stackrel{\_}{\mathrm{sample}}}^k\right)}^2\right]}{n-1}\right]}^{1/2}$

where n is the window size, sample^k is a GN_imu value or a ER_imu value from the sample rolling history, and sample^k is the GN_mean value or the ER_mean value for the sample rolling history.

For example, the IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the standard deviation values for History Epoch 1 (GN_detection¹ and ER_detection¹) as follows:

$GN_{\mathrm{detection}}^1={\left[\frac{\begin{array}{c}{\left(9.9175-9.9160\right)}^2+{\left(9.9145-9.9160\right)}^2+{\left(9.9144-9.9160\right)}^2+\\ {\left(9.9180-9.9160\right)}^2+{\left(9.9159-9.9160\right)}^2\end{array}}{4}\right]}^{1/2}=0.001659$ $ER_{\mathrm{detection}}^1={\left[\frac{\begin{array}{c}{\left(0.0346-0.0346\right)}^2+{\left(0.0346-0.0346\right)}^2+{\left(0.0346-0.0346\right)}^2+\\ {\left(0.0346-0.0346\right)}^2+{\left(0.0346-0.0346\right)}^2\end{array}}{4}\right]}^{1/2}=0.000053$

The superscript indicates the particular History Epoch for which the standard deviation values are calculated. Thus, the standard deviation values for History Epoch 2 would be represented as GN_detection² and ER_detection², and so forth.

The procedure continues to step 230 and the IMU motion detection process 114 compares the standard deviation values, e.g., the GN_detection value and the ER_detection value, for a sample rolling history to motion threshold values. The motion threshold values may be predetermined or defined by a user. In addition or alternatively, the threshold values may be adaptive and may change over time based on the behavior of the system 100. In an embodiment, the threshold values may be adaptive and may be based on an average of a selected number of GN_detection values and an average of a selected number of ER_detection values, as described in further detail below.

The procedure continues to step 235 and the IMU motion detection process 114 determines if either of the standard deviation values, e.g., GN_detection value and/or the ER_detection value, for a sample rolling history is greater than the respective motion threshold value. Specifically, the ER_detection value for a sample rolling history may be compared to a motion threshold value for earth rate and the GN_detection value for the sample rolling history may be compared to a motion threshold value for normal gravity.

If, at step 235, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines, for a sample rolling history, that the GN_detection value is greater than the motion threshold value for normal gravity or the ER_detection value is greater than the motion threshold value for earth rate, the procedure continues to step 240 and the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system (e.g., vehicle 102) to which the IMU 112 is coupled is moving.

If, at step 235, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that both the GN_detection and ER_detection values for the sample rolling history are less than or equal to the respective motion threshold values, the procedure continues to step 245 and the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system to which the IMU 112 is coupled is stationary.

In this example, the motion threshold value for normal gravity (GN_threshold) is 0.0025. In addition, and in this example, the motion threshold value for earth rate (ER_threshold) is 0.00025. Therefore, and in this example, for the first sample rolling history (History Epoch 1), the IMU motion detection process 114 compares the GN_detection¹ value of 0.001659 to the GN_threshold value of 0.0025 and also compares the ER_detection¹ value of 0.000053 to the ER_threshold value of 0.00025. Since both values are less than or equal to the respective motion threshold values, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the vehicle is stationary during History Epoch 1. Had either of standard deviation values been greater than the respective threshold values, the IMU motion detection process 114 would have determined that the vehicle is moving during History Epoch 1.

The IMU motion detection process 114 may operate in a similar manner for each of the other different History Epochs to detect, for example, motion for a different time frame (e.g., History Epoch 2).

By utilizing the standard deviation, i.e., relative variation, of the ER_imu values and GN_imu values to detect motion according to the one or more embodiments described herein, more sensitive threshold values may be utilized than the threshold values (e.g., bumped up or increased threshold values) utilized by traditional motion detection systems that use an IMU. Advantageously, the one or more embodiments describes herein may utilize a consumer grade IMU to detect motion of a vehicle that is moving along slowly (e.g., creeping), which in turn allows for reduced convergence time.

The procedure ends at step 250. It is expressly contemplated that the procedure may loop back to step 210, after determining whether the vehicle 102 is stationary or moving in steps 240 and 245 for a particular History Epoch, to obtain additional measurements and calculate additional standard deviations to determine if the vehicle 102 is stationary or moving for different History Epochs according to the one or more embodiments described herein.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram for utilizing adaptive threshold values for IMU motion detection that utilizes standard deviation according to one or more embodiments described herein. For simplicity purposes, the example values utilized herein may be rounded to a particular number of decimal digits. However, it is expressly contemplated that the one or more embodiments described herein may be implemented using values that are rounded to any number of decimal digits in order to, for example, obtain a different precision.

The procedure 300 starts at step 305 and continues to step 310 where the IMU motion detection process 114 utilizes baseline threshold values (e.g., GN_threshold and ER_threshold) for a selected number of History Epochs, e.g., a selected number of consecutive GN_detection values and ER_detection values calculated from sample rolling histories in the manner described with reference to FIG. 2, to detect motion. The baseline threshold values may be predefined, for example. In addition, a sample size (i.e., window size) may be utilized to determine the number of History Epochs, i.e., the number of consecutive History Epochs, that are to utilize the baseline threshold values. In this example, let it be assumed that the baseline GN_threshold value is 0.005, the baseline ER_threshold value is 0.0003, and the window size is 5. As such, the baseline threshold is values are utilized for History Epochs 1 through 4, e.g., 1 less than the window size. The following table includes example GN_detection values and the ER_detection values for History Epochs 1 through 4, calculated from sample rolling histories in the manner describe with reference to FIG. 2, that utilize the baseline threshold values:

History Epoch	GNdetection	ERdetection	GNthreshold	ERthreshold
1	0.000595	0.000017	0.0050	0.00030
2	0.000624	0.000019	0.0050	0.00030
3	0.000622	0.000007	0.0050	0.00030
4	0.000621	0.000005	0.0050	0.00030

Accordingly, the motion detection process 114 may compare GN_detection values and the ER_detection values, as depicted in the table above, to the respective baseline threshold values for each History Epoch to determine whether motion is detected for the History Epoch in the manner described with reference to FIG. 2. In this example, the GN_detection values (e.g., 0.000595, 0.000624, 0.000622, and 0.000621) are less than the GN_threshold value of 0.0050 for History Epochs 1 through 4. In addition, the ER_detection values (e.g., 0.000017, 0.000019, 0.000007, and 0.000005) are less than the ER_threshold value of 0.00030 for History Epochs 1 through 4. As such, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system, e.g., vehicle 102, to which the IMU 112 is coupled is stationary for History Epochs 1 through 4.

The procedure then continues to step 315 and the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates standard deviation values (e.g., GN_detection value and the ER_detection value) for a next History Epoch. Specifically, the IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the GN_detection value and the ER_detection value from a next sample rolling history in the manner described with reference to FIG. 2. In addition, the first next History Epoch may be equal to the window size (e.g., History Epoch 5). In this example, the GN_detection value and the ER_detection value for the next History Epoch are:

History Epoch	GNdetection	ERdetection
5	0.000568	0.000016

The procedure continues to step 320 and the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates adaptive threshold values for the standard deviation values (e.g., GN_detection and ER_detection values) calculated for the next History Epoch based on at least an average of a selected number of standard deviation values. In this example, the next History Epoch is History Epoch 5. The IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the adaptive threshold value (e.g., GN_threshold^k) for the GN_detection value and the adaptive threshold value (e.g., ER_threshold^k) for the ER_detection value as follows:

$GN_{\mathrm{threshold}}^k=\left[\frac{{\sum }_{n=k-\mathrm{sample}\mathrm{size}+1}^kGN_{\mathrm{detection}}^n}{\mathrm{sa}\mathrm{mple}\mathrm{size}}\right]*\mathrm{SF}$ $ER_{\mathrm{threshold}}^k=\left[\frac{{\sum }_{n=k-\mathrm{sa}\mathrm{mple}\mathrm{size}+1}^kER_{\mathrm{detection}}^n}{\mathrm{sa}\mathrm{mple}\mathrm{size}}\right]*\mathrm{SF}$

where k is a number of the next History Epoch, sample size is the window size, GN_detectionⁿ is a GN_detection value, ER_detectionⁿ is an ER_detection value, and SF is a scale factor. The scale factor may be based on system design and/or system parameters. Specifically, the scale factor may be chosen during a testing period and based on particular standard deviation values calculated for particular History Epochs where the vehicle is known to be stationary. More Specifically, the threshold values may be multiplied by a particular scale factor during the testing period such that a particular is percentage of standard deviation values, calculated for particular History Epochs where the vehicle is known to be stationary, are confirmed to be less than or equal to the threshold values.

For example, a user may determine during a testing period that when a scale factor of 3.5 is utilized, 60% percent of the standard deviation values, calculated for particular History Epochs where the vehicle is known to be stationary, are in fact less than or equal to the threshold values that are multiplied by the scale factor (e.g., 40% of the standard deviation values, calculated for particular History Epochs where the vehicle is known to be stationary, are incorrectly greater than the threshold values multiplied by the scale factor). As such, the user may utilize a scale factor of 7.5 such that 99% of particular standard deviation values, calculated for particular History Epochs where the vehicle is known to be stationary, are in fact less than or equal to the threshold values multiplied by the scale factor.

In this example, the scale factor is 7.5. Although reference is made to utilizing the same scale factor of 7.5 for the two adaptive threshold values, it is expressly contemplated that different scale factors may be utilized for each of the two adaptive threshold values.

Therefore, and in this example, the IMU motion detection process may calculate the adaptive threshold values (e.g., GN_threshold⁵ and ER_treshold⁵) for History Epoch 5 as follows:

$GN_{\mathrm{threshold}}^5=\left[\frac{\left(0.000595+0.000624+0.000622+0.000621+0.000568\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.0045$ $ER_{\mathrm{threshold}}^5=\left[\frac{\left(0.000017+0.000019+0.000007+0.000005+0.000016\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.00010$

In this example, the GN_detection⁵ value of 0.000568 is less than the GN_threshold⁵ value of 0.0045 for History Epoch 5. In addition, the ER_detection⁵ value of 0.000016 is less than the ER_threshold⁵ value of 0.0010 for History Epoch 5. As such, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system, e.g., vehicle 102, to which the IMU 112 is coupled is stationary for History Epoch 5.

The following table shows the GN_detection values, the ER_detection values, the GN_threshold values, and the ER_threshold values for History Epochs 1 through 5:

History Epoch	GNdetection	ERdetection	GNthreshold	ERthreshold
1	0.000595	0.000017	0.0050	0.00030
2	0.000624	0.000019	0.0050	0.00030
3	0.000622	0.000007	0.0050	0.00030
4	0.000621	0.000005	0.0050	0.00030
5	0.000568	0.000016	0.0045	0.00010

As illustrated in the table above, History Epochs 1 through 4 utilize the baseline threshold values while History Epoch 5 utilizes the adaptive threshold values.

The procedure then loops back to step 315 to calculate a GN_detection value and a ER_detection value for a next History Epoch, and then continues to step 320 to calculate, for the next History Epoch, an adaptive threshold value for the GN_detection value and an adaptive threshold value for the ER_detection value. As such, the threshold values (e.g., GN_threshold and ER_threshold values) are adaptively adjusted as new standard deviation values (e.g., GN_detection and ER_detection values) are calculated to more precisely and accurately detect motion. In this example, let it be assumed that the IMU motion detection process 114 calculates the GN_detection values and the ER_detection values for History Epochs 6 and 7 from sample rolling histories in the manner described with reference to FIG. 2 as:

History Epoch	GNdetection	ERdetection
6	0.000419	0.000015
7	0.000454	0.000019

Therefore, and in this example, the IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the adaptive threshold values for History Epoch 6 as follows:

$GN_{\mathrm{threshold}}^6=\left[\frac{\left(0.000624+0.000622+0.000621+0.000568+0.000419\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.0043$ $ER_{\mathrm{threshold}}^6=\left[\frac{\left(0.000019+0.000007+0.000005+0.000016+0.000015\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.00009$

Similarly, the IMU motion detection process 114 may calculate the adaptive threshold values for History Epoch 7 as follows:

$GN_{\mathrm{threshold}}^7=\left[\frac{\left(0.000622+0.000621+0.000568+0.000419+0.000454\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.0040$ $ER_{\mathrm{threshold}}^7=\left[\frac{\left(0.000007+0.000005+0.000016+0.000015+0.000019\right)}{5}\right]*7.5=0.00009$

In this example, the GN_detection⁶ value of 0.000419 is less than the GN_threshold⁶ value of 0.0043 for History Epoch 6. In addition, the ER_detection⁶ value of 0.000015 is less than the ER_threshold⁶ value of 0.00009 for History Epoch 6. As such, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system, e.g., vehicle 102, to which the IMU 112 is coupled is stationary for History Epoch 6 based on the adaptive threshold values.

Further, and in this example, the GN_detection⁷ value of 0.000454 is less than the GN_threshold⁷ value of 0.0040 for History Epoch 7. In addition, the ER_detection⁷ value of 0.000019 is less than the ER_threshold⁷ value of 0.00009 for History Epoch 7. As such, the IMU motion detection process 114 determines that the system, e.g., vehicle 102, to which the IMU 112 is coupled is stationary for History Epoch 7 based on the adaptive threshold values.

The following table shows the GN_detection values, the ER_detection values, the GN_threshold values, and the ER_threshold values for History Epochs 1 through 7:

History Epoch	GNdetection	ERdetection	GNthreshold	ERthreshold
1	0.000595	0.000017	0.0050	0.00030
2	0.000624	0.000019	0.0050	0.00030
3	0.000622	0.000007	0.0050	0.00030
4	0.000621	0.000005	0.0050	0.00030
5	0.000568	0.000016	0.0045	0.00010
6	0.000419	0.000015	0.0043	0.00009
7	0.000454	0.000019	0.0040	0.00009

As illustrated in the table above, History Epochs 1 through 4 utilize the baseline threshold values while History Epochs 5 through 7 utilizes the adaptive threshold values.

Therefore, an initial baseline threshold value may be utilized, and the one or more embodiments described herein may advantageously “tune” (adjust) the threshold values based on the environment in which the system operates, which is reflected in the calculated standard deviation values. For example, consider a situation where an IMU 112 is in a vehicle 120, e.g., locomotive, but isolated from external forces (e.g., winds, people, etc.) that could generate false indications of movement. As such, and according to the one or more embodiments described herein, the thresholds values may be tuned, e.g., adjusted down, based on the standard deviation values calculated during consecutive History Epochs such that motion detection is more precise and accurate. However, if the IMU 112 in the vehicle 120 is in a location that is susceptible to the external forces, the threshold values may be adjusted down, but not as much as when the IMU 112 is isolated from the external forces so that false indications of movement are reduced or eliminated. Thus, the threshold values are adjusted (i.e., adapted) based on the environment such that the system may utilized different threshold values in different environments. Accordingly, the one or more embodiments described herein provide advantages in the technological field of IMU motion detection.

The foregoing description described certain example embodiments. It will be apparent, however, that other variations and modifications may be made to the described embodiments, with the attainment of some or all of their advantages. For example, each of the one or more embodiments described herein may be used with one or more other embodiments described herein. In addition, although reference is made to the IMU motion detection process 114 being within the INS 110, it is expressly contemplated that the IMU motion detection process 114 may be part of the IMU 112, or GNSS receiver 104 and implement one or more embodiments described herein. Alternatively, the IMU motion detection process 114 may be part of a hardware component that is separate and distinct from the IMU 112, INS 110, and GNSS receiver 104 and implement one or more embodiments described herein.

Claims

1. A system, comprising: an inertial measurement unit (IMU) coupled to a body of interest and configured to obtain IMU measurements;a processor configured to: calculate, for a new sample, an absolute magnitude of earth rate value and an absolute magnitude of normal gravity value based on an accumulation of a particular number of the IMU measurements;create a sample rolling history that includes the new sample and a selected number of previously created samples;calculate a first standard deviation value for normal gravity based on the absolute magnitude of normal gravity values included in the sample rolling history;calculate a second standard deviation value for earth rate based on the absolute magnitude of normal gravity values included in the sample rolling history; andcompare the first standard deviation value to a first motion threshold value and the second standard deviation value to a second motion threshold value to determine if the body of interest is moving or is stationary.

2. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to: determine that the body of interest is moving when the first standard deviation value is greater than the first motion threshold value or the second standard deviation value is greater than the second motion threshold value.

3. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to: determine that the body of interest is stationary when the first standard deviation value is less than or equal to the first motion threshold value and the second standard deviation value is less than or equal to the second motion threshold value.

4. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to calculate the absolute magnitude of earth rate (ERimu) as:

5. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to calculate the absolute magnitude of normal gravity (GNimu) as: GNimu=((Σk=1n(Δvxk−vbiasx))2+(Σk=1n(Δvyk−vbiasy))2+(Σk=1n(Δvzk−vbiasz))2)1/2,

6. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to calculate the first standard deviation value (normal gravity detection) for normal gravity as:

7. The system of claim 1, where the processor is further configured to calculate the second standard deviation value (earth rate detection) for earth rate as:

8. A method, comprising: obtaining inertial measurement unit (IMU) measurements;calculating, for a new sample and by a processor, an absolute magnitude of earth rate value and an absolute magnitude of normal gravity value based on an accumulation of a particular number of the IMU measurements;creating, by the processor, a sample rolling history that includes the new sample and a selected number of previously created samples;calculating a first standard deviation value for normal gravity based on the absolute magnitude of normal gravity values included in the sample rolling history;calculating a second standard deviation value for earth rate based on the absolute magnitude of normal gravity values included in the sample rolling history; andcomparing the first standard deviation value to a first motion threshold value and the second standard deviation value to a second motion threshold value to determine if a body of interest is moving or is stationary.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: determining that the body of interest is moving when the first standard deviation value is greater than the first motion threshold value or the second standard deviation value is greater than the second motion threshold value.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising: determining that the body of interest is stationary when the first standard deviation value is less than or equal to the first motion threshold value and the second standard deviation value is less than or equal to the second motion threshold value.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising: calculating the absolute magnitude of earth rate (ERimu) as:

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising: calculating the absolute magnitude (GNimu) of normal gravity as: GNimu=((Σk=1n(Δvxk−vbiasx))2+(Σk=1n(Δvyk−vbiasy))2+(Σk=1n(Δvzk−vbiasz))2)1/2,

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising: calculating the first standard deviation value (normal gravity detection) for normal gravity as:

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising: calculating the second standard deviation value (earth rate detection) for earth rate as:

15. A system coupled to a body of interest, the system comprising: a processor configured to: calculate a first standard deviation value for normal gravity for a selected history epoch;calculate a second standard deviation value for earth rate for the selected history epoch;calculate an adaptive normal gravity threshold value for the selected history epoch based on at least an average of a selected number of other first standard deviation values for normal gravity calculated for previous history epochs and the first standard deviation value for normal gravity for the selected history epoch;calculate an adaptive earth rate threshold value based on at least an average of the selected number of other second standard deviation values for earth rate for the previous history epochs and the calculated second standard deviation value for earth rate for the selected history epoch; andcompare the first standard deviation value to the adaptive normal gravity threshold value and the second standard deviation value to the adaptive earth rate threshold value to determine if the body of interest is moving or is stationary for the selected history epoch.

16. The system of claim 15, where the processor is further configured to: determine that the body of interest is moving when the first standard deviation value is greater than the adaptive normal gravity threshold value or the second standard deviation value is greater than the adaptive earth rate threshold value.

17. The system of claim 15, where the processor is further configured to: determine that the body of interest is stationary when the first standard deviation value is less than or equal to the adaptive normal gravity threshold value and the second standard deviation value is less than or equal to the adaptive earth rate threshold value.

18. The system of claim 15, where the processor is further configured to: compare the other first standard deviation values for normal gravity to a first baseline threshold value and the other second standard deviation values for earth rate to a second baseline threshold value to determine if the body of interest is moving or is stationary during the previous history epochs.

19. The system of claim 15, where the adaptive normal gravity threshold value is further based on a first scale factor and the adaptive earth rate threshold value is further based on a second scale factor.

20. The system of claim 15, where the processor is further configured to: calculate the adaptive normal gravity threshold value for the selected history epoch (GNthresholdk) as: