1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to the field of information handling system manufacture, and more particularly to a system and method for information handling system image communication over a network to a manufacture location.
2. Description of the Related Art
As the value and use of information continues to increase, individuals and businesses seek additional ways to process and store information. One option available to users is information handling systems. An information handling system generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of the information. Because technology and information handling needs and requirements vary between different users or applications, information handling systems may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in information handling systems allow for information handling systems to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications. In addition, information handling systems may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.
Businesses often order multiple numbers of information handling systems for manufacture with predetermined software configurations so that the information handling systems will arrive at the business ready for use. The software configurations generally include specified operating systems and applications as well as customization settings, such as hard disc drive partitions, network settings, application settings, user profiles and data, and even desktop settings. In some instances, businesses will prepare an image of a hard disc drive having the desired software configuration and will provide the image to the information handling system manufacturer for copying to manufactured information handling systems. The businesses will send the image to the information handling system manufacturer who, in turn, sends the image to various development and fulfillment centers for manufacture preparation. Once the business image is tested and prepared for promotion to the factory, the image is sent to the manufacture location for copying to manufactured information handling systems. The manufactured information handling systems are then sent to the business with the desired image ready to interact with the business' information technology environment.
One difficulty with the manufacture of information handling systems using customer images is that the images are generally large in size and thus take considerable time to transfer by network communication. For instance, a typical notebook information handling system image has multiple gigabytes of information and takes hours to communicate through networks to overseas manufacturing sites. Additional delays are often introduced by the initial communication of the image from the customer to the manufacturer and communication of the image within various manufacturer development and fulfillment centers for testing and manufacture preparation. Further, storage of images at various manufacture centers consumes considerable memory resources for the extended time period during which the images are communicated, tested and used. Overall, the manufacture of information handling systems with images provided by customers and communicated by networks through the manufacturer centers generally imposes relatively high storage, network and management costs, as well as decreased customer satisfaction due to delays in manufacture and delivery of ordered information handling systems.
Therefore a need has arisen for a system and method which more efficiently communicates information handling system images over networks for manufacture of information handling systems with an image.
In accordance with the present invention, a system and method are provided which substantially reduce the disadvantages and problems associated with previous methods and systems for manufacture of information handling systems with an image. An image is analyzed to identify a traits definition that allows re-creation of the image, and the traits definition is communicated over a network to a manufacture location. The traits definition is applied at the manufacture location to re-create the image for copying to an information handling system.
More specifically, an order site image analyzer accepts an image from a customer site and analyzes the image to identify the operating system, applications and unique information, such as registry settings and application forms and templates. An image decompressor decompresses the image for analysis by a settings engine, mapping engine and application engine that create an image traits definition XML file. For instance, the image traits definition has a schema with elements to identify the operating system including service packs and patches, the applications including forms and templates, registry settings including video resolution, network and power management settings, and other custom configuration information including hard disc drive partitions, computer name, local account, domain name, modem and desktop settings. The image traits definition is communicated by a network to a distal manufacture site image rebuilder that re-creates the image from an image component library and the unique information. The re-created image is then copied to manufactured information handling systems to ship to the customer that ordered the image. In one embodiment, the image analyzer resides at the customer site to create the image traits definition at the customer site for communication to the manufacturer, thus reducing customer use of network resources to communicate an image to a manufacturer for manufacture of an information handling system.
The present invention provides a number of important technical advantages. One example of an important technical advantage is that substantially less information is actually communicated in the transfer of an image traits definition than an entire image. The image traits definition essentially represents an image DNA that allows reproduction of a cloned image at the manufacture site with traits defined by an original image. An information handling system is built with the cloned image in substantially less time since the delays of communication of the entire image are not experienced. Further, overhead costs of network and storage capacity are substantially reduced due to the reduced size of the image traits definition compared against the size of the complete image. For example, a common portable information handling system image has a size of multiple gigabytes while the traits definition for that image has a size of around 20 kilobytes.
The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.
Manufacture of information handling systems with an image is performed with consumption of less network and memory resources by creating an image traits definition, communicating the traits definition to a distal manufacturing site and re-creating the image from the traits definition for copying to manufactured information handling systems. For purposes of this disclosure, an information handling system may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an information handling system may be a personal computer, a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. The information handling system may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handling system may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display. The information handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
Referring now to
Customer images are accepted from network 20 by an order site image analyzer 22, which analyzes the images to identify the operating system, applications and unique information for creation of image traits definition 12. An image decompressor 24 decompresses the image to its installed form for analysis by a settings engine 26. Settings engine 26 determines the operating system and applications of the image and extracts the custom configuration information. For instance a registry template finds settings from the operating system registry, such as the video resolution, network and power management settings. A mapping engine 28 maps settings from any outdated configurations to up-to-date configurations. For instance, operating system upgrades, patches and service packs that alter registry settings from earlier operating system versions are mapped to the earlier versions so that image traits definition 12 will support an image having an updated operating system. An application engine 30 analyzes the decompressed image to identify unique information associated with applications, such as forms and templates. Order site image analyzer 22 then saves the identified information to an image traits definition having Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema such as that depicted by
Once order site image analyzer 22 creates image traits definition XML file 12, image traits definition 12 is sent through network 20, such as the Internet, to a manufacture site image rebuilder 32. Manufacture site image rebuilder 32 reads the attributes from the XML schema of image traits definition 12 to re-create information handling system 14. The software components for the image re-creation, such as the operating system and applications, are called from an image components library 35 and populated with the custom configuration and other unique information of image traits definition 12. The re-created image is then provided to an information handling system burn rack 34 for copying to manufactured information handling system 16. By identifying the “DNA” of the image, image traits definition 12 substantially reduces the amount of information that is communicated in order to transfer an image 14 across a network 20. In alternative embodiments, image analyzer 22 may be located at customer site 18 so that the customer communicates the image traits definition 12 to order information handling systems having image 14. In such an embodiment, the manufacturer distributes image rebuilder 32 at the various manufacturer sites that use the full image, such as for testing.
Referring now to
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5692190 | Williams | Nov 1997 | A |
5754190 | Dutton et al. | May 1998 | A |
5995757 | Amberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6080207 | Kroening et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6178546 | McIntyre | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182275 | Beelitz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247128 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282711 | Halpern et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301707 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6505094 | Pape et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6658563 | Ice et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690984 | Thrift et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714937 | Eynon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6775829 | Kroening | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789109 | Samra et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6823508 | Burkhardt et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6928644 | Kroening et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7010144 | Davis et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7032011 | Woodard et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7117256 | Blinn | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7392309 | Childers et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7620737 | Newman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7774369 | Herzog et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020112232 | Ream et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124245 | Maddux et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030030664 | Parry | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030097427 | Parry | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163809 | Bantz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030220944 | Lyman Schottland et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006689 | Miller et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015536 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025155 | Sedlack et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083450 | Porkka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040148601 | Kroening | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040205172 | Kim | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243998 | Collins et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055688 | Barajas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050132028 | Lester et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144617 | Chefalas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050198628 | Graham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283456 | Graham et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283636 | Vasudevan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031434 | Tindal | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048222 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080656 | Cain et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095755 | Hanes et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173993 | Henseler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060239568 | Hanes et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070038992 | Mahasintunan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080007768 | Cho | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080215711 | Shitrit | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100088194 | Sierer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10352811 | Jun 2005 | DE |
1 443 398 | Jan 2004 | EP |
0144934 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9963434 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
McBrearty, G.F., Method for Software Installation and Apply Once Update From a Single Image, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 38, No. 11, Nov. 1995. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060095755 A1 | May 2006 | US |