This invention relates to devices and methods for the repair of defects that occur in articular cartilage on the surface of bones, particularly the knee.
Articular cartilage, found at the ends of articulating bone in the body, is typically composed of hyaline cartilage, which has many unique properties that allow it to function effectively as a smooth and lubricious load-bearing surface. However, when injured, hyaline cartilage cells are not typically replaced by new hyaline cartilage cells. Healing is dependent upon the occurrence of bleeding from the underlying bone and formation of scar or reparative cartilage called fibrocartilage. While similar, fibrocartilage does not possess the same unique aspects of native hyaline cartilage and tends to be far less durable.
Hyaline cartilage problems, particularly in knee and hip joints, are generally caused by disease such as occurs with rheumatoid arthritis or wear and tear (osteoarthritis), or secondary to an injury, either acute (sudden), or recurrent and chronic (ongoing). Such cartilage disease or deterioration can compromise the articular surface causing pain and further deterioration of joint function. As a result, various methods have been developed to treat and repair damaged or destroyed articular cartilage.
For smaller defects, traditional options for this type of problem include non-operative therapies (e.g., oral medication or medication by injection into the joint), or performing a surgical procedure called abrasion arthroplasty or abrasion chondralplasty. The principle behind this procedure is to attempt to stimulate natural healing. At the defect site, the bone surface is abraded, removing approximately 1 mm. or less using a high-speed rotary burr or shaving device. This creates an exposed subchondral bone bed that will bleed and will initiate a fibrocartilage healing response. Although this procedure has been widely used over the past two decades and can provide good short term results, (1-3 years), the resulting fibrocartilage surface is seldom able to support long-term weight bearing, particularly in high-activity patients, and is prone to wear.
Another procedure, referred to as the “microfracture” technique, incorporates similar concepts of creating exposed subchondral bone. During the procedure, the cartilage layer of the chondral defect is removed. Several pathways or “microfractures” are created to the subchondral bleeding bone bed by impacting a metal pick or surgical awl at a minimum number of locations within the lesion. By establishing bleeding in the lesion and by creating a pathway to the subchondral bone, a fibrocartilage healing response is initiated, forming a replacement surface. Results for this technique are generally similar to abrasion chondralplasty.
Another known option to treat damaged articular cartilage is a cartilage transplant, referred to as a Mosaicplasty or osteoarticular transfer system (OATS) technique. This involves using a series of dowel cutting instruments to harvest a plug of articular cartilage and subchondral bone from a donor site, which can then be implanted into a core made into the defect site. By repeating this process, transferring a series of plugs, and by placing them in close proximity to one another, in mosaic-like fashion, a new grafted hyaline cartilage surface can be established. The result is a hyaline-like surface interposed with a fibrocartilage healing response between each graft.
This procedure is technically difficult, as all grafts must be taken with the axis of the harvesting coring drill being kept perpendicular to the articular surface at the point of harvest. Also, all graft placement sites must be drilled with the axis of a similar coring tool being kept perpendicular to the articular surface at the point of implantation. Further, all grafts must be placed so that the articular surface portion of these cartilage and bone plugs is delivered to the implantation site and seated at the same level as the surrounding articular surface. If these plugs are not properly placed in relation to the surrounding articular surface, the procedure can have a very detrimental effect on the mating articular surface. If the plugs are placed too far below the level of the surrounding articular surface, no benefit from the procedure will be gained. Further, based on the requirement of perpendicularity on all harvesting and placement sites, the procedure requires many access and approach angles that typically require an open field surgical procedure. Finally, this procedure requires a lengthy post-operative non-weight bearing course.
Transplantation of previously harvested hyaline cartilage cells from the same patient has been utilized in recent years. After the cartilage is removed or harvested, it is cultured in the lab to obtain an increase in the number of cells. These cells are later injected back into the focal defect site and retained by sewing a patch of periosteal tissue over the top of the defect to contain the cells while they heal and mature. The disadvantages of this procedure are its enormous expense, technical complexity, and the need for an open knee surgery. Further, this technique is still considered somewhat experimental and long-term results are unknown. Some early studies have concluded that this approach offers no significant improvement in outcomes over traditional abrasion and microfracture techniques.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,835 to Hart et al. discloses an apparatus and method for repair of articular cartilage including a bone plug removal tool, and a bone plug emplacement tool. The method of repairing defective articular cartilage includes the steps of removing the defective cartilage and forming a hole of sufficient depth at the site. A bone plug comprising intact bone and cartilage adhering thereto is removed from a bone lacking defective cartilage is placed in the hole at the site of the damage.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,413,608 to Keller discloses a knee joint endoprosthesis for replacing the articular surfaces of the tibia comprising a bearing part which is anchored on the bone having an upper bearing surface and a rotatable plateau secured on the bearing surface and forming a part of the articular surface to be replaced. A journal rises from the bearing surface and cooperates with a bore in the plateau to provide lateral support.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,745 to Schwartz describes a method of surgically implanting into a site a bio-absorbable cartilage repair assembly. The assembly includes a bio-absorbable polygonal T-shaped delivery unit having radial ribs to be mounted in the removed area and a porous bio-absorbable insert supported by and in the delivery unit. The method comprises the steps of preparing the site to receive the assembly by removing a portion of the damaged cartilage and preparing the site to receive the assembly by drilling and countersinking the bone. The assembly is inserted and seated using an impactor in the drilled and countersunk hole in the bone until the assembly is flush with the surrounding articular surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,466 to Vitale illustrates an articular joint surface replacement system having two opposing components. Each component has a tapered head piece for covering the end of a bone and for acting as an articular surface, an integrally formed screw stem of sufficient length to extend into the bone and inwardly angled bone grips on the underside of the head piece to allow fixation to the bone by compression fit. The partially spherical convex shaped exterior of the first component complements the partially spherical concave shaped exterior of the second component.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,401 to Shaffer discloses an intra-articular measuring device including a hollow handle defining a first passageway and a hollow tube having a second passageway extending from the handle, the hollow tube carrying a projection at its distal end for seating on a fixed site and a probe disposed at the distal end of the hollow tube which may be directed to a second site, to enable measurement of the distance between the first and second sites.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,310 to Vannah describes a method of mapping the three-dimensional topography of the surface of an object by generating digital data points at a plurality of sample points on said surface, each digital data point including a property value and a position value corresponding to a particular point representing the properties of the surface of the object. A 3-D transducer probe (e.g., a digitizer) is moved on or over the surface along a random path, and the sample points are digitized to generate a real-time topography or map on a computer screen of selected properties of the object, including without limitation, surface elevation, indentation stiffness, elevation of sub-surface layers and temperature.
Prosthetics for total knee replacement (TKR), whereby the entire knee joint or a single compartment of the knee joint is replaced can be a common eventuality for the patient with a large focal defect. Although these patients are also managed with anti-inflammatory medications, eventual erosion of the remaining articular cartilage results in effusion, pain, and loss of mobility and/or activity for the patient. Problems encountered after implanting such prostheses are usually caused by the eventual loosening of the prosthetic due to osteolysis, wear, or deterioration of the cements used to attach the device to the host bones. Further, some prostheses used are actually much larger than the degenerated tissue that needs to be replaced, so that extensive portions of healthy bone are typically removed to accommodate the prostheses. Patients who undergo TKR often face a long and difficult rehabilitation period, and the life span of the TKR is accepted to be approximately 20 years. Accordingly, efforts are made to forgo the TKR procedure for as long as possible.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved joint surface replacement system that would be effective in restoring a smooth and continuous articulating surface and that would also be as durable as the former hyaline cartilage surface, within the context of a minimally invasive procedure that allows for a nearly immediate return to activity, restoration of lifestyle, and pain relief.
The present invention provides tools and methods for mapping and measuring the articular surface of a joint (or of any bony surface) and for fabricating a prosthetic device based on this recorded data.
In one method consistent with the invention, once the defect of the chondral surface has been identified, a guide pin is inserted arthroscopically. A fixation screw having a tapered distal tip and an aggressive distal end thread form is then driven into the subchondral bone in relation to a reference axis that is approximately central to the defect. The fixation device also serves to define a tangent point to the surrounding articular surface. The screw is driven by a socket type driver that engages a hex-shaped proximal extension. A further cylindrical proximal extension of the screw (or other mating feature, e.g., a recess in the screw) that eventually serves as a fixation element for the surface prosthetic is at this time concealed with a cover (or other mating feature corresponding to the mating feature of the screw, e.g., a plug for mating with a screw having a recess as its mating feature) having a radiused proximal end. One or more milled slots run the length of the uniform diameter portion of the screw.
Under arthroscopic view, the screw depth is adjusted so that the radiused cover surface is positioned tangent to the radius that defines the existing articular surface. At this time, the guide pin is removed and the knee is articulated. The depth positioning of the radiused cover establishes an origin or reference point for all future measuring, cutting, and prosthetic machining operations. Arthroscopic examination is carried out to confirm positioning.
A measuring tool is inserted on the reference axis. A central element of the measuring tool is a static post that establishes the axial location of origin. By rotating the outer arm or outrigger of the measuring tool relative to the static post while also maintaining contact with the articular surface, an axial displacement or Z dimension can be established relative to the origin for any point along the known radial sweep of the outrigger to determine the final geometry of the prosthetic surface which fits within the defect. These Z dimensions can be recorded in real time with conventional dial gauge indicators, or with digital recording devices, or by using marking techniques. Although numerous points may be taken, ideally a minimum number of points are taken to accurately define the target articular surface.
Locating surfaces or features created on the screw, (or alternatively, on the radius cover, as described in alternative embodiments herein), correlate to some surface or feature on the measuring tool and allow the measurement of the rotational position of the points about the axis with respect to the locating surfaces. Data recorded during the mapping procedure can then be entered into parametric engineering design software or similar algorithm to define a three dimensional surface matched to the bearing surface geometry to be implanted and reproduce the anatomic contours mapped.
An alternative measuring device for obtaining the articular surface dimension includes an outer marking element and an inner recording element. The marking element includes a sharp indenting mechanism which when pressed by the surgeon creates a depression or mark in the relatively soft surface of the recording element, which deforms at these marked points so that they can be utilized as patient data. The recording element also includes a surface that corresponds to the surface of the proximal extension of the fixation screw. During the mapping procedure, data points are established of the rotational position of the mapped articular surface relative to the screw. These data points are translated to the implant geometry so that the accurate rotational location of the implant relative to the screw is maintained.
In order to secure the implant to the fixation screw, a precision taper (or other component of a mating feature) is machined into a protrusion (or other component of a mating feature) on the back of the device. The implant may be constructed of cobalt chromium, or other materials. The implant may also include a slight outward taper or protrusion along the diametrical surface to enhance load bearing or load transfer properties of the implant to surrounding bone. Additionally, a series of radial cuts may create surfaces that increase resistance of the implant to rotational forces. These features may be located around the outer diameter of the implant.
In another aspect, the invention includes a compass instrument for measurement and surface preparation of the implant target site subsequent sizing of the implant. This compass instrument is configured so that it can be delivered to the site arthroscopically, and when coupled to the axis defined by the guide pin it can be used for measuring and cutting operations.
In another embodiment, the compass instrument consists of a handle, a cannulated shaft that extends through the handle, and a cannulated distal offset arm configured to serve as a linearly adjustable mounting tool for a series of cutting blades, boring blades, or measuring probes.
With the guide pin advanced through the instrument shaft, when fitted with a blade, a fixed length from the rotational or reference axis to the cutting blade's cutting surface is established. This defines the radius that is effected as the instrument is rotated around the guide pin, and corresponds to the overall diameter of the implant. This sharp cutting blade is used to circumscribe and cleanly cut the surrounding articular cartilage.
In another aspect, the invention features a bone cutting or scoring instrument whereby the bone-cutting instrument is positioned on the guide pin reference axis and is used to prepare the target site to match in configuration and dimension the contacting surface of the implant. The matching fit between the bone surfaces of the prepared target site and the bone contacting surfaces of the implant can advantageously ensure long term clinical results with the implant, as poor quality of fit between bone surfaces and bone contacting surfaces of traditional orthopedic prosthetic devices has been noted to contribute to early clinical failures.
Following fabrication of the implant, a second surgical procedure is performed. The radiused cover is removed exposing a precision taper (or, alternatively, the cover may be removed during the first procedure). A pin with a distally mounted element is placed through the central lumen of the fixation screw so that the distally mounted element is secured into the screw. This element carries one or more suture strands that now trail from the fixation screw. The sutures are then threaded through the implant and a knot or bead may be created proximal to the implant. By continuing to manipulate and tension the suture strands, the implant can be brought coaxial to the fixation screw. Once coaxial, the implant is aligned via engagement of the keyed elements and driven into place with a plastic driving rod and mallet. Finally, through the guide aperture on the surface of the implant, bone cement may be injected to enhance the contact surface between the implant and the subchondral bone.
In another aspect, the invention further features a driver whereby the implant is connected to the driver via a holder and a tether element, such as a suture or wire. The implant and the driver are then inserted arthroscopically. Tension is then applied to the tether element so that the implant is drawn back and seated on the driver. The implant can then be controllably delivered to the prepared target site. The seat portion of the driver may comprise a material that may be impacted to seat the implant without damaging the implant surface.
a is an exploded side view of an exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is an exploded perspective view of an exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a side view of an exemplary assembled fixation screw and hex shaped extension in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is an exploded perspective view of another exemplary fixation screw and implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a perspective view of the upper surface of an exemplary implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side view of an exemplary implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a perspective view of the lower surface of an exemplary implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a side view of an exemplary assembled fixation device and implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a perspective view of an assembled fixation device and implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a perspective view of the upper surface of an exemplary implant, in one embodiment of the present invention;
d is a perspective view of the lower surface of an exemplary implant, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a sectional view of a knee having damaged articular cartilage, showing an exemplary guide pin drilled into the central portion of the defect and an arthroscope being disposed adjacent thereto, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side view of the distal tip of an exemplary drill device for boring a pilot hole to receive an exemplary fixation screw, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a sectional view of a knee having damaged articular cartilage, showing an exemplary fixation screw being driven into the defect by an exemplary socket type driver arranged on the guide pin, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side view of the exemplary fixation screw, socket type driver and guide pin of
a is a perspective view of a knee having damaged articular cartilage, showing an exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension implanted in the defect after removal of an exemplary socket type driver and guide pin, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a sagital view of the exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension of
c is a perspective view of an exemplary fixation screw, proximal extension and cover, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a sectional view of an exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension implanted in the defect with the exemplary guide pin replaced and an exemplary measuring tool arranged thereon, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side partial cross-sectional view of the exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension of
c is a perspective view of an exemplary fixation screw and proximal extension, with the cover removed, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a sectional view of an exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension implanted in the defect, after removal of the hex-shaped proximal extension, with an exemplary pin and suture strands placed therethrough, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side partial cross-sectional view of the exemplary fixation screw and hex-shaped proximal extension of
a is a sectional view of an exemplary fixation screw implanted in the defect, with an exemplary pin and suture strands placed therethrough, showing the implanted fixation screw with the implant being tensioned on the suture strands, in a surgical procedure consistent with one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a partial cross-sectional view of the exemplary fixation screw of
a is a schematic representation of the two datum curves used to define a patient-specific three-dimensional surface for construction of the articular or lower surface of an implant in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a top view of an exemplary hex-shaped proximal extension in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a perspective view of the bone-contacting or upper surface of an exemplary implant, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a perspective view of an exemplary compass instrument, in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a perspective view of the distal offset arm of an exemplary compass instrument and cutting blade to be mounted thereon, in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a perspective view of an exemplary driver, showing an exemplary implant on an exemplary tether element, in one embodiment of the present invention;
d is a perspective view of an exemplary driver, showing an exemplary implant tensioned on an exemplary tether element, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a perspective view of another exemplary cutting blade, in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a perspective view of an exemplary measuring probe, in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a perspective view of an exemplary multi-faced blade mounted in the distal offset arm of an exemplary compass instrument, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a perspective view of an exemplary site preparation and cutting device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a cross sectional view of the exemplary site preparation and cutting device of
c is a perspective view of another exemplary site preparation and cutting device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
d is a side view of another exemplary site preparation and cutting device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
e is a perspective view of another exemplary site preparation and cutting device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
a is a sectional view of the upper surface of an exemplary implant, in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side view of a portion of the exemplary implant of
c is a perspective view of the upper surface of the exemplary implant of
d is an exploded perspective view of another exemplary implant with taper lock ring, washer and suture, in one embodiment of the present invention;
e is a top perspective view of the exemplary implant of
f is a bottom perspective view of the exemplary implant of
g is a perspective view of the exemplary implant of
h is another perspective view of the exemplary implant of
i is another perspective view of the exemplary implant of
a is a perspective view of an exemplary inner recording element of an exemplary measuring device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
b is a perspective view of an exemplary outer marking element of an exemplary measuring device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
c is a cross-sectional perspective view of an exemplary measuring device showing an exemplary inner recording element and an exemplary outer marking element, in one embodiment of the present invention;
d is an exploded perspective view of another exemplary measuring device, in one embodiment of the present invention;
e is a perspective view of the exemplary measuring device of
f and 20g are side views of the exemplary measuring device of
h is a perspective view of the distal end of the exemplary measuring device of
i is a perspective view of the distal end of the exemplary measuring device of
As an overview,
As illustrated in
One or more milled slots 13 run the length of the uniform diameter portion of the screw 10. Slots 13 ensure that as healing or tissue in-growth begins, migrational or rotational movement of the screw is inhibited. The screw 10 is configured to be driven by a female or socket type driver 2 as shown in
Alternatively, as shown in
Also, while many of the components described herein are cannulated, having guide apertures, through holes, and/or central lumina along their length, for disposing such components about a guide rod for proper location of the components with respect to the articular surface, it should be recognized that a suture 313 or other flexible element, or other guide feature may be used in place of a guide rod, or a guide rod or wire may be eliminated altogether from one or more steps consistent with the invention described herein. As shown in
As shown in
In order to secure the implant 40 to the fixation screw 10, precision taper 44 is machined into or onto a protrusion 45 on the top surface 42 of the implant. The precision taper 44 is configured to engage the cylindrical proximal extension 14 of the screw 10, once the hex-shaped cover 30 has been removed therefrom. Taper 44 may be mated with extension 14 so that a friction fit is provided between these surfaces. The assembled fixation device is shown in
As shown in
By way of example,
A drill mechanism 306, as illustrated in
For surface preparation and accurate measurement of the implant site and the subsequent sizing of the implant, instrument 120 is provided. The compass instrument 120 may be configured to serve as a mounting tool for a number of functional blades or tips and when located about the axis 20A, via guide rod 20, may be used for measuring and cutting operations. In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
As illustrated in
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
Turning now to
a, 20b and 20c show an alternative measuring and mapping device 210 for obtaining the articular surface dimension, comprising housing 217 and a recording element 218. As shown in
Turning to
For example, as shown in
Locating surfaces or features created on the radius cover 30, or along some length of the fixation screw 10, hex-shaped drive surface of the screw 14 or on the cylindrical proximal extension (or recess) of the screw 14, correlate to some surface or feature on the measuring tool 70 and allow the measurement of the rotational position of the four measured points 81a, 81b, 82 and 82b, about the reference axis 20A with respect to said locating surfaces. This data becomes important in configuring the implant 40 with respect to the fixation screw 10 so that the proper orientation of said measured points to fabricated geometry is maintained. Of course, such measuring tool can be configured to measure any number of points at any interval desired.
While the measurements are illustrated in
Other embodiments of measuring and recording tools are possible. One such embodiment of a measuring and recording tool 210′ is shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
Datum curves 86 and 87, representing the medial-lateral (“ML”) and anterior-posterior (“AP”) curves, are constructed by connecting the end points of the line elements 81a and 81b, and 82a and 82b and the point of origin 80, which is common to both curves. These two datum curves 86 and 87 can be used to construct the articular or bottom surface 41 of the prosthetic implant 40. By sweeping datum curve 87 along a path defined by datum curve 86, a three dimensional surface is now defined.
By constructing this series of geometric relationships in a known parametric engineering model, patient-specific geometry can be input as values and the model algorithm can be run to reproduce the anatomic contours mapped in the patients within only a few moments. As a process, this generic model is the starting point for all patient treatments. Sterile pins, screws, and measuring devices that are all non-patient-specific may be stocked in the hospital and ready to use whenever an appropriate defect is diagnosed. Patient-specific data may be transmitted from the surgeon to the fabricating facility via an interface to the Internet or other network. Data input into the interface may be read directly into the generic parametric model to produce a viewable and even mappable patient-specific parametric model within moments. Confirmation by the surgeon could initiate a work order for the production of the patient specific device. Existing technology allows the parametric model to generate toolpaths and programming, e.g., to a CAD/CAM system comprising appropriate hardware and/or software coupled to appropriate data-driven tools, to fabricate the implant.
Defining two additional datum curves 88 and 89, at offset distances from datum curves 86 and 87, is performed to define the top or non-bearing surface 42 of the implant 40. This top surface 42 should be closely matched to the bearing surface geometry to be implanted without having to remove an excessive quantity of bone from the chondral surface.
Referring to
For example, as shown in
As shown in
However, if a greater depth of implant is needed as a result of the defect appearance the offset curves 88 and 89 (as shown in
With reference now to
In the foregoing exemplary algorithm, a first data point D6 is initially assigned as the maximum value (maxval). If . . . then type statements are used to compare other data points (D11 and D14) to maxval. If other data points are greater than maxval, the algorithm reassigns maxval to the new larger data point. LLMT represents the height of the lower limit plane along the z-axis, and ULMT represents the height of the upper limit plane along the z-axis. D684 is a dimension that controls the ULMT plane, which is established in the model as the upper surface of the implant. ULMT is positioned as maxval plus an additional arbitrary and/or fixed material offset (0.045 in this case).
c and 5d illustrate an alternative embodiment of the implant 40′, having a ML curve between data points 340 and 341 and an AP curve between data points 342 and 343, with male-shaped mating component 304 and key-shaped portion 344 for engagement with a reciprocal key-shaped surface in the proximal extension of a fixation screw, protrusions 345 (creating contact surfaces on the top 346 of the implant 40′), radial cuts 347 located at the outer diameter 348 of the implant 40′, and radius 349 (which may be formed, e.g. using an abrasive wheel) around the intersection of the outer diameter at point 341 and the surface comprising the patient geometry.
Referring to
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
As shown in
Additional data can be taken at the time of the initial procedure, e.g., for fabricating a non-circular implant. Additional data curves can also be defined by measuring the offsets from the reference axis 20A and determining diameters at these offsets. The final implant geometry, although measured using circular techniques, need not be circular.
Referring to
Turning to
If necessary, the arthroscopic wound 200 is expanded slightly in either a vertical or horizontal direction, so that the implant 40 may be passed through. A polymeric sleeve (not shown) positioned over the implant may prove helpful in passing the implant through the incision. As shown in
As shown in
Referring to
Finally, as shown in
Alternatively, guide aperture 46 in the implant 40 may be altogether eliminated by using an alternative implant delivery system, as shown in
As shown in
As
Further composite implant embodiments are illustrated in
Other materials from which an implant consistent with the invention may be constructed, in whole or in part, include ceramic, e.g. aluminum oxide or zirconium oxide; metal and metal alloys, e.g. Co—Cr—W—Ni, Co—Cr—M, CoCr alloys, CoCr Molybdenum alloys, Cr—Ni—Mn alloys, powder metal alloys, 316L stainless steel, Ti 6Δ1-4V ELI; polymers, e.g., polyurethane, polyethylene (wear resistant and cross-linked), thermoplastic elastomers; biomaterials, e.g. polycaprolactone; and diffusion hardened materials, e.g. Ti-13-13, Zirconium and Niobium. Coatings used may include, e.g., porous coating systems on bone-contacting surfaces, hydrophilic coatings on load-bearing surfaces, hydroxyapatite coatings on bone-contacting surfaces, and tri-calcium phosphate on bone-contacting surfaces. Additionally, components of the invention may be molded or cast, hand-fabricated, or machined.
Alternatively, measurement methods may be utilized whereby radius measurements are taken with respect to an axis AA corresponding to an axis about the point of origin in the implant to be used (as shown in
It is noted that, although the invention is herein described as utilizing a single reference axis, multiple reference axes may be used for measuring, mapping, or cutting a single defect or an articular surface having multiple defects, as well as for fabricating a single implant, or multiple implants for a single articular surface, consistent with the invention. In other embodiments, methods for mapping the defect and/or articular surface other than those described hereinabove are possible, e.g., MRI or CT scanning.
It is further noted that, although the invention is described herein as utilizing the specific geometry of a patient's articular surface to fabricate an implant for that patient, it is contemplated that data from a plurality of patients may be analyzed statistically and utilized in fabricating and/or manufacturing (e.g. in large quantities) one or more universal, generic, or standard supply item type implants for medical practitioners to use in a procedure consistent with the invention. For such implants, as well as for patient-specific implants as described herein, pre- or post-implantation trimming may be required to correct for minor variations that may occur as between the implant and the subchondral bone (or other articular surface).
It should be understood that, although the various tools described hereinabove, e.g., for measuring, cutting, and seating, are described as separate devices, a single handle, shaft and/or instrument may be configured to serve as a universal mounting tool for a series of devices for performing various functions consistent with the invention.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is subject to other modifications and/or alterations, all of which are deemed within the scope of the present invention, as defined in the hereinafter appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/360,228, filed Feb. 6, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,029,479, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/846,657, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,964, filed May 1, 2001, which claims benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/201,049, filed May 1, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
992819 | Springer | May 1911 | A |
1451610 | Gestas | Apr 1923 | A |
2267925 | Johnston | Dec 1941 | A |
3840905 | Deane | Oct 1974 | A |
4016651 | Kawahara et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4034418 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4044464 | Schiess et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4158894 | Worrell | Jun 1979 | A |
4344192 | Imbert | Aug 1982 | A |
4433687 | Burke et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4462120 | Rambert et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4474177 | Whiteside | Oct 1984 | A |
4484570 | Sutter et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4531517 | Forte et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535768 | Hourahane et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4634720 | Dorman et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4655752 | Honkanen et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4661536 | Dorman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4662371 | Whipple et al. | May 1987 | A |
4664669 | Ohyabu et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673407 | Martin | Jun 1987 | A |
4693986 | Vit et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4712545 | Honkanen | Dec 1987 | A |
4719908 | Averill et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4729761 | White | Mar 1988 | A |
4823780 | Odensten et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4842604 | Dorman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4896663 | Vandewalls | Jan 1990 | A |
4911153 | Border | Mar 1990 | A |
4927421 | Goble et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938778 | Ohyabu et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
4976037 | Hines | Dec 1990 | A |
4979957 | Hodorek | Dec 1990 | A |
4989110 | Zevin et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990163 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997434 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4998938 | Ghajar et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007930 | Dorman et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019104 | Whiteside et al. | May 1991 | A |
5100405 | McLaren | Mar 1992 | A |
5127920 | MacArthur | Jul 1992 | A |
5192291 | Pannek, Jr. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201881 | Evans | Apr 1993 | A |
5211647 | Schmieding | May 1993 | A |
5224945 | Pannek, Jr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5255838 | Gladdish, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263498 | Caspari et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263987 | Shah | Nov 1993 | A |
5282863 | Burton | Feb 1994 | A |
5290313 | Heldreth | Mar 1994 | A |
5312411 | Steele | May 1994 | A |
5314478 | Oka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314482 | Goodfellow et al. | May 1994 | A |
5336224 | Selman | Aug 1994 | A |
5354300 | Goble et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358525 | Fox et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360446 | Kennedy | Nov 1994 | A |
5374270 | McGuire et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383937 | Mikhail | Jan 1995 | A |
5387218 | Meswania | Feb 1995 | A |
5395401 | Bahler | Mar 1995 | A |
5409494 | Morgan | Apr 1995 | A |
5413608 | Keller | May 1995 | A |
5423822 | Hershberger | Jun 1995 | A |
5458643 | Oka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480443 | Elias | Jan 1996 | A |
5486178 | Hodge | Jan 1996 | A |
5509918 | Romano | Apr 1996 | A |
5520695 | Luckman | May 1996 | A |
5522900 | Hollister | Jun 1996 | A |
5534031 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5580353 | Mendes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593450 | Scott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5595193 | Walus et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601550 | Esser | Feb 1997 | A |
5616146 | Murray | Apr 1997 | A |
5620055 | Javerlhac | Apr 1997 | A |
5624463 | Stone et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5645598 | Brosnahan, III | Jul 1997 | A |
5681311 | Foley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683400 | McGuire | Nov 1997 | A |
5683465 | Shinn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683466 | Vitale | Nov 1997 | A |
5700264 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700265 | Romano | Dec 1997 | A |
5702401 | Shaffer | Dec 1997 | A |
5702465 | Burkinshaw | Dec 1997 | A |
5702467 | Gabriel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5741266 | Moran et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769855 | Bertin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771310 | Vannah | Jun 1998 | A |
5772866 | Hart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776137 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5782835 | Hart et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810851 | Yoon | Sep 1998 | A |
5817095 | Smith | Oct 1998 | A |
5824105 | Ries et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5882350 | Ralph et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885297 | Matsen, III | Mar 1999 | A |
5885298 | Herrington et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888210 | Draenert | Mar 1999 | A |
5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
5895390 | Moran et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911126 | Massen | Jun 1999 | A |
5918604 | Whelan | Jul 1999 | A |
5919196 | Bobic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928239 | Mirza | Jul 1999 | A |
5928286 | Ashby et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5964752 | Stone | Oct 1999 | A |
5964768 | Huebner | Oct 1999 | A |
5964808 | Blaha et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968050 | Torrie | Oct 1999 | A |
5989269 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990382 | Fox | Nov 1999 | A |
5997543 | Truscott | Dec 1999 | A |
6004323 | Park et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010502 | Bagby | Jan 2000 | A |
6015411 | Ohkoshi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017348 | Hart et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019767 | Howell | Feb 2000 | A |
6045564 | Walen | Apr 2000 | A |
6052909 | Gardner | Apr 2000 | A |
6059831 | Braslow | May 2000 | A |
6071310 | Picha et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081741 | Hollis | Jun 2000 | A |
6086593 | Bonutti | Jul 2000 | A |
6102948 | Brosnahan, III | Aug 2000 | A |
6120542 | Camino et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132433 | Whelan | Oct 2000 | A |
6146385 | Torrie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149654 | Johnson | Nov 2000 | A |
6159216 | Burkinshaw et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165223 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168626 | Hyon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171340 | McDowell | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193724 | Chan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206885 | Ghahremani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217549 | Selmon et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217619 | Keller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235060 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280474 | Cassidy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299645 | Ogden | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299648 | Doubler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306142 | Johanson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315798 | Ashby et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322500 | Sikora et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328752 | Sjostrom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342075 | MacArthur | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358251 | Mirza | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358253 | Torrie et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375658 | Hangody et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383188 | Kuslich | May 2002 | B2 |
6415516 | Tirado et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443954 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461373 | Wyman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468309 | Lieberman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478178 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6478801 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482210 | Skiba et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494914 | Brown | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520964 | Tallarida et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527754 | Tallarida et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530956 | Mansmann | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537274 | Katz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540786 | Chibrac et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551322 | Lieberman | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575982 | Bonutti | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585666 | Suh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591581 | Schmieding | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599321 | Hyde et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607561 | Brannon | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610067 | Tallarida | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6746451 | Middleton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783550 | MacArthur | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783551 | Metzger | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6802864 | Tornier | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814735 | Zirngibl | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827722 | Schoenefeld | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6860902 | Reiley | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884246 | Sonnabend et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6923813 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926739 | O'Connor | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6962577 | Tallarida et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969393 | Pinczewski et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989016 | Tallarida et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7029479 | Tallarida | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7063717 | St. Pierre et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115131 | Engh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156880 | Evans et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160305 | Schmieding | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163541 | Ek | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166133 | Evans et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204839 | Dreyfuss et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204854 | Guederian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235107 | Evans et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241316 | Evans et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264634 | Schmieding | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7303577 | Dean | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7311702 | Tallarida et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20010012967 | Mosseri | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039455 | Simon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056266 | Tallarida et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020055783 | Tallarida et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020106393 | Bianchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138150 | Leclercq | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147498 | Tallarida et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028196 | Bonutti | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060887 | Ek | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105465 | Schmieding et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120276 | Tallarida et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120278 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171756 | Fallin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181878 | Tallarida et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204195 | Keane et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225456 | Ek | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225457 | Justin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015170 | Tallarida et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034359 | Schmieding et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034437 | Schmieding | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082906 | Tallarida et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106928 | Ek | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133276 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138754 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138758 | Evans et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148030 | Ek | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153087 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193281 | Grimes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199166 | Schmieding et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230315 | Ek | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260303 | Carrison | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015153 | Gobel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043808 | Felt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065612 | Winslow | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075642 | Felt | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050143731 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143745 | Hodorek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143831 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154398 | Miniaci et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229323 | Mills et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050287187 | Mansmann | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004461 | Justin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020343 | Ek | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060052878 | Schmieding | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058744 | Tallarida et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085006 | Ek | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149370 | Schmieding et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195112 | Ek | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229726 | Ek | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070005143 | Ek | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073394 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093842 | Schmieding | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093890 | Eliasen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118136 | Ek | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123921 | Ek | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179608 | Ek | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233128 | Schmieding et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250067 | Schmieding et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255399 | Eliasen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265700 | Eliasen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288031 | Dreyfuss et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299519 | Schmieding | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004659 | Burkhart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015709 | Evans et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027430 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033443 | Sikora et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080086139 | Bourke et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080172125 | Ek | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183290 | Baird et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188935 | Saylor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080275512 | Albertirio et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306483 | Iannarone | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001262308 | Dec 2001 | AU |
2003262428 | Aug 2009 | AU |
2933174 | Apr 1980 | DE |
3516743 | Nov 1986 | DE |
0350780 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0350780 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0485678 | May 1992 | EP |
0505634 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0903125 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0903127 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0661023 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1426013 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1278460 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2242068 | Mar 1975 | FR |
2642301 | Aug 1990 | FR |
2718014 | Oct 1995 | FR |
2739151 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2372707 | Sep 2002 | GB |
61502029 | Sep 1986 | JP |
63300758 | Dec 1988 | JP |
3504932 | Oct 1991 | JP |
H03-092328 | Nov 1992 | JP |
518511 | Mar 1993 | JP |
06339490 | Dec 1994 | JP |
11244315 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001525210 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003534096 | Nov 2003 | JP |
19881003781 | Jun 1988 | WO |
8909578 | Oct 1989 | WO |
9427507 | Dec 1994 | WO |
1997022306 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9920192 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0105336 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0166021 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0166022 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0182677 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0182677 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0191648 | Dec 2001 | WO |
02086180 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03047470 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03051210 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03051211 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03061516 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004014261 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004026170 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004075777 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005051231 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005512331 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006004885 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006091686 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060190002 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60201049 | May 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09846657 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10360228 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10360228 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11379151 | US |