The present invention is directed to a system and method for keyless entry, and remote starting of a vehicle, where the vehicle has an OEM remote embedded in the vehicle.
Vehicles were traditionally locked and unlocked, and started, with a physical key. As advances in technology were made, remote locking and unlocking became standard on many models. Remote starters, both OEM and aftermarket, are now also prevalent, and are gaining in popularity. In the area of convenience for users of vehicles, remote keyless entry and push to start systems, once reserved for higher end luxury vehicles, are now trickling down to mid-range and entry level models.
As automation and convenience features have gained in popularity, so have thieves' efforts to defeat these systems. In the field of wireless communication, encryption, and techniques such as spread-spectrum or code hopping have been adopted by car manufacturers to increase the security of these systems.
It is often desirable to provide aftermarket remote starting and remote locking and unlocking of the vehicle. In order to maintain the integrity of the OEM system, aftermarket providers are often required to leave an OEM remote FOB inside the vehicle, hidden. This is becoming an irritant for users as they must purchase an extra OEM remote, which are expensive, in part because of the security that is embedded in them.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a system and method to allow keyless entry and remote starting of a vehicle, without requiring the user to carry an extra FOB which includes the OEM FOB. The user utilizes his own remote A for authentication in order to unlock/lock the vehicle while entering/exiting the vehicle without the need of an OEM remote B which is embedded in the vehicle. The same remote A is used for authentication inside the vehicle for the purpose of starting the engine by pushing the start button or turning a knob in the vehicle. The user's remote A remains in the user's pocket.
Among the advantages of the invention, it will appear to a person skilled in the art that no FOB of any kind is required to unlock/lock the vehicle. A GSM phone or a device that contains a Bluetooth or Wifi transceiver can also start the car.
If device A is a key fob, only one key fob is required for to unlock/lock and remote start. In a growing number of cars, an antitheft bypass simulating the OEM fob security features is not available. Embedding an existing OEM remote B and using the system and method of the present invention enables all users of the vehicle to carry only a single device, and avoids the purchase of another key fob, which is potentially quite expensive and time consuming.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a keyless entry system for a vehicle, said vehicle being provided with an OEM remote inside a vehicle, said keyless entry system being operatively connected to a security system of said vehicle, said keyless entry system being adapted to selectively block low frequency transmissions from said security system to said OEM remote when said security system receives an indication that a user unlocks said vehicle, in order to permit locking or unlocking of said vehicle, or remote starting of said vehicle.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a vehicle comprising a keyless go system, and at least one key fob, said keyless go system being operatively connected to a locking/unlocking subsystem and an engine start subsystem, said vehicle further comprising at least one LF transmitter, at least one LF receiver, at least one HF transmitter and at least one HF receiver, said vehicle further comprising an aftermarket keyless go system interfacing with said keyless go system, wherein at least one of said at least one key fob is embedded into said vehicle, and wherein when a user sends a lock/unlock command, or a start command with a portable device, said aftermarket keyless go system interacts with said embedded key fob to selectively enable and disable low frequency communication between said embedded key fob and said keyless go system.
In accordance with a third aspect of the invention, there is provided an aftermarket keyless go system interfacing with an on-board keyless go system in a vehicle, said aftermarket keyless go system interacting with an aftermarket remote starter, said aftermarket keyless go system being adapted to interact with said on-board keyless go system, said vehicle being provided with an OEM key fob embedded inside said vehicle, in order to permit a user to start said vehicle by pressing a predetermined sequence of keys on said aftermarket remote starter, causing said aftermarket keyless do system to selectively enable/disable said OEM key fob.
The present invention will be better understood after having read a description of a preferred embodiment thereof, made in reference with the following drawings, in which:
In the following description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, the following terms and expressions are used:
1. IAM—Independent aftermarket
2. Device A: either one of the following
3. Device B—OEM key fob
4. Device C—OEM Keyless Go system in vehicle
5. Device D—IAM keyless go system
6. LF receiver—device that receives coded low-frequency RF signal in the low frequency range typically 125 kHz
7. LF transmitter—A device that transmits coded low-frequency RF signal in the low frequency range typically 125 kHz
8. HF transmitter—Device that transmits a coded high-frequency RF signal in the high-frequency range typically 300 MHz AM or FM
9. Access P—a pushbutton on the handle of the vehicle door or a touch sensor inside the door handle allowing the user to unlock/lock the vehicle door
10. KG—Keyless Go
Normal Operation
The general operation of common keyless go systems which uses RFID is as follows [see
The OEM remote B contains a LF receiver and a HF transmitter.
The user approaches the car and activates the door entry system by pulling on the door handle or pressing a pushbutton on the door handle. This action activates the OEM KG system C to transmit a challenge to the OEM remote B by sending a LF transmission to the OEM remote B asking for authentication. OEM remote B upon receiving request, responds by sending an HF radio response to the KG system C which contains a HF receiver. The KG system C authenticates the response and unlocks the door. Similarly the same authentication process occurs when the user sits in the vehicle and pushes the start button to start the vehicle.
Preferred Embodiment
In one preferred embodiment illustrated in
System C along with remote B authenticates key fob A providing key fob A is close enough to the vehicle allowing unlocking/locking and remote start. In a sense, system C, remote B and device A are “paired”, in that device A is registered with system C and remote B.
System D is an IAM module that is embedded in the vehicle. Module D contains an HF receiver and an LF transmitter. Upon receipt of a signal from the pushbutton of the car, System D then sends an LF signal to remote A. Remote A upon receipt of LF signal then transmits a HF signal to system D. System D authenticates Remote A as a valid user.
When the pushbutton of the car is pressed, system C tries to communicate with OEM remote B seeking authentication. System D controls OEM remote B by blocking or unblocking the LF signal from system C, or enable/disable the power supply of remote B.
If System D does not authenticate remote A it will block the OEM remote from receiving the LF signal from system C. This prevents any random user to gain entry unless he has Remote A.
It is important to note that system C will still work with any user that has an OEM remote.
A similar process ensues when the user wants to start the car.
Locking the Car
Most cars will not allow the user to lock the car using Access P, while the OEM remote is inside the vehicle.
The KG system A has two LF transmitting antennae. On each action by the user, the car sends transmissions from each antenna in sequence separated by a certain time interval. Each antenna has a different power level. The second antenna with the lower power level will only get a response if the OEM remote is inside the car. The first antenna with a higher power level will get a response of the OEM remote is outside the car. By sending sequential signals and analyzing the response signals, the system can determine whether the remote is inside the car or outside the car. This way the user can lock the car by using access P and not leave the OEM remote inside the car.
In the aftermarket system of the present invention, system D will block the lower power antenna transmission, or disable power supply of OEM remote during the low power antennae transmission, so that the OEM remote does not respond, in effect tricking the car into thinking that the OEM remote is outside the car (because the OEM remote will respond to the higher power antenna).For this system to work, system D must be synchronized with the antenna signals.
Using an Embedded OEM Remote as an Extra Key
In this case, as illustrated in
For example if the user has lost his primary remote. The user unlocks the car with his remote starter remote A, and uses the predetermined sequence of button presses to enable the OEM remote. The car will recognize that the OEM remote is inside the vehicle and allow the user to start the vehicle. In this embodiment the remote starter remote A does not have to be a RFID remote since the only authentication that takes place between Remote A and Module D is the RF signal with the predetermined button presses.
Although the present invention has been explained hereinabove by way of a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be pointed out that any modifications to this preferred embodiment within the scope of the appended claims is not deemed to alter or change the nature and scope of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority from provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/828,424, filed May 29, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5874785 | Liu | Feb 1999 | A |
5937065 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6037675 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6218932 | Stippler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6323566 | Meier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6538560 | Stobbe | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6662085 | Chang | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6714119 | Mindl | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6747545 | Nowottnick et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6960981 | Blatz | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7091835 | Boulay et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7466219 | Ishimura et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7613551 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7629919 | Wilcox | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650864 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7683757 | King et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7783451 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791457 | Ghabra et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808424 | Wilcox | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7915997 | King et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7978049 | Leitch | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8077011 | Mcbride et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8112185 | Wu | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8254869 | Hyde et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264320 | Nelson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8421589 | Sultan et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8825224 | Fazi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8983534 | Patel | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010033222 | Nowottnick et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030222757 | Ghabra et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030222813 | Boulay et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040135435 | Nelson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040222899 | Yezersky et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050033484 | Geber et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050090952 | Boulay et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050168322 | Appenrodt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060044108 | Nowottnick | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071555 | Borngraber et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060114100 | Ghabra | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164207 | Wilcox | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060266089 | Dimig | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070021082 | Okumura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070085658 | King | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080042801 | Nelson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080079603 | King et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106391 | Santavicca et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109123 | Kachouh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080284564 | Leitch | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009303 | Fujioka et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090133453 | Mueller | May 2009 | A1 |
20090206989 | Leitch | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206990 | Nelson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212906 | Michel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090256677 | Hein et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100026557 | Wilcox | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100141389 | Hagl et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188192 | Lumley | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217457 | Georgi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231351 | Lickfelt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305779 | Hassan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110102138 | Girard, III et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102139 | Girard, III et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112969 | Zaid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110257817 | Tieman | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120031155 | Shimura et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120268242 | Tieman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280788 | Nowottnick | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303182 | Choi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130079952 | Fazi | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130110318 | Colja et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176069 | Leong | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130268141 | Du et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268142 | Du et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268143 | Du et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268144 | Du et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140240086 | Van Wiemeersch | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240090 | Mutti et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140285319 | Khan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140327517 | Portet | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150029010 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61828424 | May 2013 | US |