The present invention relates, in general, to client-server systems and, more particularly, to a server proxy object creation model for managing client-server interaction.
In the realm of computing, the relationship that drives most useful applications is the client-server relationship. The interaction between client and server allows most computing beyond an unconnected, single computer. The client-server relationship defines an architecture in which a user's computer, which may be a personal computer (PC), may be the client machine or entity requesting something from a server, which is the supplying machine or entity. However, a PC may also operate as the server side of the client-server relationship. Both are typically connected via some kind of network, such as a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN).
In the client-server model, the client typically processes the user interface (WINDOWS™, MACINTOSH™, etc.) and may perform some or all of the application processing. Servers may range in capacity from high-end PCs to mainframes. A database server typically maintains databases and processes requests from the client to extract data from or to update the database. An application server, which is a software server, typically provides additional business processing for the clients.
While many client-server models are now commonly referred to as “Web based” and/or “Web enabled,” the architecture is conceptually the same. Users' PCs may still be clients, and there are tens of thousands of Web servers throughout the Internet delivering Web pages and other functionality. On the Web, the client typically runs the browser and, just like legacy client/server systems, can perform a little or a lot of processing, such as simply displaying hypertext mark-up language (HTML) pages, processing embedded scripts, or considerable processing with JAVA™ applets. A myriad of browser plug-ins provide all sorts of possibilities for client processing.
The server side of the Web is typically a multi-tiered server architecture with interlinked Web servers, application servers, database servers, and caching servers. In developing network applications that are offered on the Web, the developer typically codes all aspects of communication between the client and server. Actions intended for the client may depend on responses or actions on the server. Similarly actions on the server may depend on actions or responses from the client. This architecture produces an asynchronous event model. If step 1 is dependent on a response from the server, the process grinds to a halt, and step 2 will be delayed until the response for step 1 has been received.
The programming model for dealing with the asynchronous nature of the client-server architecture may be awkward even to experienced programmers. Therefore, the development of applications which include client-server interaction have generally been reserved for experienced programmers.
Representative embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method for linearly exposing client-server interaction comprising interpreting a function command representing a first group of sequential action requests to an integrated multimedia communication server (iMCS), sequentially transmitting the first group of sequential action requests from an interactive multimedia runtime (iMR) client to the iMCS, wherein a next sequential action request of the first group is transmitted to the iMCS prior to receiving a response message from the iMCS associated with a previous sequential action request of the first group, queuing response messages received from the iMCS, and handling the queued response messages.
Additional representative embodiments are directed to a user-accessible system for managing communication in an interactive multimedia application environment (iMAE) network comprising an iMR client, an iMCS in communication with the iMR; an event response queue for storing event response signals from the iMCS, a plurality of user-selectable functions, each of the functions abstracting an associated set of server interaction requests, and a sequence manager within the iMR for directing sequential execution of the set of server interaction requests of first selected ones of the plurality of functions prior to sequentially receiving event response signals associated with the set of server interaction requests from the iMCS.
Further representative embodiments are directed to a computer program product having a computer readable medium with computer program logic recorded thereon, the computer program product comprising code for abstracting into a single function, a defined sequence of communication interactions between an iMR and an iMCS, code for abstracting into at least one other single function, at least one other defined sequence of communication interactions between the iMR and the iMCS, code for sequentially calling the single function and the at least one other single function by the iMR prior to completion of the defined sequence of communication interactions, and code for queuing responses from the iMCS.
Further representative embodiments are directed to a method for controlling communication interactions between an iMR client and an iMCS in programming computer applications, the method comprising making a set of functions available to a user, wherein each of the functions represents an abstraction of one or more of the communication interactions, executing ones of the set of functions selected by the user for performing a desired task, wherein a next selected function is sequentially executed regardless of completion of each of the communication interactions associated with a prior selected function, and queuing information received on completion the one or more communication interactions.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
Before discussing the present invention in greater detail, it is appropriate to discuss the operations of the typical client-server architecture.
When application server 13 finishes processing the data for Step 1, it sends polling signal 106 to Web server 11 to establish communications again. If Web server 11 correctly receives polling signal 106, it will send ACK signal 107 back to application server 13 to acknowledge correct receipt of polling signal 106 and indicating that it's ready to proceed with communication. Application server 13 may then transmit data signal 108 to Web server 11 containing the processed data for Step 1. Once Web server 11 receives data signal 108 from application server 13, it must re-establish communication with client 10. To do so, Web server 11 sends polling signal 109 to client 10. If client 10 correctly receives polling signal 109, it will transmit ACK signal 110 to Web server 11 to acknowledge correct receipt of polling signal 109 and indicating that it's ready to proceed with communication. As communication is re-established between Web server 11 and client 10, Web server sends the processed data for Step 1 back to client 10. The process then begins over again with Step 2, by client 10 sending polling signal 112 to Web server 11.
It should be noted that variations of the communication process as described in
One programming method that has been used to address the asynchronous client-server interaction is through the use of callbacks.
This type of asynchronous programming model can be quite complex. For Web designers used to tag-based scripting languages, the advanced techniques used by computer programmers for implementing the asynchronous client-server relationship has since kept true client-server application development out of the hands of the typical tag-based programmer. However, instead of relying on the complexities of the asynchronous programming model, one embodiment described herein captures the same function using a linear model.
The abstraction presented by the described embodiment is implemented in part through the use of an event response queue.
Without the interruptive event handling, the remainder of the publishing methods may be called in a linear progression. Stream object method 401 initiates a new stream object on the connection. Attach media method 402 attaches a specific media resource, whether live or pre-recorded, to the new stream object to form a media stream. Publish media method 403 then publishes the media stream on iMCS 41 making the media stream available to clients for subscription. Sequence manager 406 assists in the processing by directing publishing iMR 40 to sequence from step to step prior to receiving responses or acknowledgements from iMCS 41. Because the programming structure for publishing the desired media is now representable in a linear fashion, the typical or even novice tag-based programmer would preferably be capable of coding, what has typically been a complex asynchronous event system, in only a few lines of code.
The ability to present developers with a linear model for managing client-server interactions is supported by the abstraction of certain defined sequences of communication interactions between an iMR and an iMCS. For example, referring to
When implemented in software, the elements of the present invention are essentially the code segments to perform the necessary tasks. The program or code segments can be stored in a processor readable medium or transmitted by a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, or a signal modulated by a carrier, over a transmission medium. The “computer readable medium” may include any medium that can store or transfer information. Examples of the computer readable medium include an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, a ROM, a flash memory, an erasable ROM (EROM), a floppy diskette, a compact disk CD-ROM, an optical disk, a hard disk, a fiber optic medium, a radio frequency (RF) link, etc. The computer data signal may include any signal that can propagate over a transmission medium such as electronic network channels, optical fibers, air, electromagnetic, RF links, and the like. The code segments may be downloaded via computer networks such as the Internet, Intranet, and the like.
Bus 502 is also coupled to input/output (I/O) controller card 505, communications adapter card 511, user interface card 508, and display card 509. The I/O adapter card 505 connects to storage devices 506, such as one or more of a hard drive, a CD drive, a floppy disk drive, a tape drive, to the computer system. The I/O adapter 505 would also allow the system to print paper copies of information, such as documents, photographs, articles, etc. Such output may be produced by a printer (e.g. dot matrix, laser, and the like), a fax machine, a copy machine, or the like. Communications card 511 is adapted to couple the computer system 500 to a network 512, which may be one or more of a telephone network, a local (LAN) and/or a wide-area (WAN) network, an Ethernet network, and/or the Internet network. User interface card 508 couples user input devices, such as keyboard 513, pointing device 507 to the computer system 500. The display card 509 is driven by CPU 501 to control the display on display device 510.
It should be noted that while many of the examples included herein have described a process for opening and publishing a media stream to a multimedia communication server, the embodiments of the present invention may be used to implement any task or feature of client-server interaction. Instead of publishing a media stream, a client may request data retrieval and processing from the communication server, or other such processing or services, the present invention is not limited solely to publication of media streams. Furthermore, while the examples scripts have been provided in pseudocode, it should be noted that computer languages, such as MACROMEDIA's ACTIONSCRIPT™ and other similar computer language may be used to implement the various embodiments of the present invention.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/353,782, entitled “SERVER PROXY OBJECT CREATION METHOD AND SYSTEM,” filed Jan. 29, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,246,356 B1, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4991168 | Richards | Feb 1991 | A |
5577028 | Chugo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5751968 | Cohen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841432 | Carmel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5996025 | Day et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6044205 | Reed et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6064379 | DeMoney | May 2000 | A |
6085252 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148334 | Imai et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163796 | Yokomizo | Dec 2000 | A |
6216157 | Vishwanath et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6307856 | Imai | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6397230 | Carmel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6453355 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477580 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487564 | Asai et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6549934 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6631418 | Watkins | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6760378 | Conklin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763390 | Kovacevic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6801947 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823394 | Waldvogel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877010 | Smith-Semedo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6985932 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990497 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999424 | Kovacevic et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003570 | Messinger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7133922 | She et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149813 | Flanagin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7185099 | Block | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197531 | Anderson | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7346669 | Anderson | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7383289 | Kraft et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7472349 | Srivastava et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
20010004417 | Narutoshi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020055989 | Stringer-Calvert et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065926 | Hackney et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020103815 | Duvillier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116716 | Sideman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030046431 | Belleguie | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055862 | Bhat | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061369 | Aksu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030115268 | Esposito | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030154239 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187993 | Ribot | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221014 | Kosiba et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040032424 | Florschuetz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040098533 | Henshaw et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040215803 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060161516 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10353782 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11771849 | US |