The present invention pertains to commercial transactions conducted over a computer network, and more particularly to a system and method for selecting and purchasing a plurality of items on such a network.
Conducting commercial transactions over computer networks such as the Internet is commonplace today. As the number of Internet shoppers continues to increase, the number and corresponding dollar value of goods and services, i.e., items, purchased electronically in such manner also continues to increase. However, conventional techniques for searching for items to be purchased, are searching, viewing specifications and prices, and selecting for purchase of such items, one item at a time.
Specifically, in order to conduct such transactions today, a consumer has to search for such items one at a time by accessing and browsing web pages of a website, one web page and one website at a time. Searching for and purchasing items of interest in this manner is a very tedious, time consuming and frustrating process. Even the most sophisticated and advanced shopping search engines, such as www.MySimon.Com, which enables a shopper to enter product specifications, and then searches for the websites of participating merchants that may carry the items being searched, still requires that searching and purchasing be done one item at a time, one web page and one website at a time. Accordingly, it is an objective of the present invention to overcome the foregoing drawback.
A system and method for conducting commercial transactions over the Internet, whereby a shopper, by using one search command, can simultaneously search for a plurality of items on at least one website in a single search action. The shopper specifies items of interest to be searched, and in one embodiment can also specify and/or exclude websites to be searched. In additional embodiments, the system searches a selectively alterable set of default or server recommended websites. To use the invention, the shopper enters a list of items in response to a series of prompts. Under one search command, the system then simultaneously searches for all of the specified items on the default site, the system recommended site(s), or site(s) specified by the shopper, or all of the above in another embodiment. Information regarding the items retrieved as a result of the search is then displayed for viewing by the shopper. The shopper can simultaneously purchase selected ones of said items.
a, 1b, and 1c show a flowchart depicting an example operation of the present invention. A selective subset of these steps can be implemented for desired application.
The present invention enables a shopper to selectively designate a plurality of items which they wish to purchase, simultaneously conduct a search for said items on a plurality of websites, view information found regarding the specified items, and then purchase all or some of these items. This enables shoppers to search for and purchase items without having to engage in the tedious and time-consuming process of searching for items one at a time, one web page and one website at a time as is conventionally done. The user can also simultaneously search for different types of items using the present invention.
The system and method of the present invention is implemented by software. The software is used in conjunction with a website that the shopper would visit to shop for items to be purchased. The software presents a series of on-screen prompts in response to which the shopper specifies the items to be searched and specifies information/preferences and/or answers questions regarding the items so that a search can be conducted for such items. The software alternately causes a search to be conducted on a default website, website(s) specified by the shopper, and/or on a selectively alterable set of default website(s), recommended website(s) specified by an intelligent software, or all of the above. The results of the search are then compiled, formatted, and displayed on a display device for viewing by the shopper who can purchase selected ones or all of the items found in the search, or further refine the search.
a, 1b, and 1c show a flow chart depicting an example operation of the present invention. A selection of steps illustrated can be implemented for a desired application. At step 1, a shopper enters via keyboard, mouse, stylus, voice or otherwise, a list of the items they wish to purchase at a default site the shopper visits for such items. Alternatively, a shopper can select items to be searched from a default list of items offered by a project program such as a meal preparation program, by checking boxes for ingredients to be purchased from a website that sells food products. At step 2, the shopper reviews the shopping list. At step 3, the shopper decides whether to edit the shopping list. If the shopper wants to edit the shopping list, then the shopper does so at step 4 and the shopper can review the edited list at step 2. If at step 3, the shopper decides not to edit the shopping list and the default site is not a portal, at step 20 the list is sent to the site server. At step 21 the search is conducted on the default site. The process then proceeds to step 13 in
At step 7 in
At step 13, the server writes the results, i.e., data gathered, of the search for all of the items from all of the sites searched into a file and formats the file. At step 14, the server sends the file to the shopper's access device. The file can be presented to the shopper in any form, including in a series of lists, wherein each list corresponds to items found on different websites or databases, or wherein each list is comprised of similar types of items or similarly priced items. The list of items can be presented for viewing by the shopper using any desired criteria. At step 15, the shopper reviews the file and selects and approves for purchase those items he desires, and such approval is sent to the server. At step 16, the server places an order at the appropriate website or sites for the items selected and approved for purchase by the shopper and then send a confirmation to the shopper.
If at step 11, the server rejects all websites specified by the shopper as problem sites, then at step 17 the server returns the list of specified sites together with reasons for rejection, and a list of recommended sites to the shopper. At step 18, if so desired, the shopper can choose and prioritize the system recommended sites, or selects to search all system recommended sites at the default prioritization recommended by the server. At step 19, the revised list of sites is then sent to the server for search at step 12, from where the process continues as previously described above.
If at step 5 the shopper does not specify any website, then the list of items to be purchased are sent at step 20 to the server. The server returns the list of recommended sites at step 17, from which point the process continues as previously described above.
It will further aid in understanding the operation of the present invention to consider the following example. If a shopper wants to shop for ingredients for a meal, the recipe or recipes for the meal are presented on-screen with a check box in front of each ingredient on the list of required ingredients, along with option entry blanks for the shopper to select or exclude items and to indicate other information such as how many servings are to be prepared to automatically populate an editable quantity column.
After the shopper enters their preferences/selections, the shopper is presented with a list of suppliers from whom they can purchase the goods. The shopper then selects and prioritizes the list of suppliers in order of descending preference. The website or database of the first most preferred supplier is then searched for the desired items on the list, and data regarding said items is collected and compiled. Then the website or database of the second most preferred supplier is searched for the specified items with said data being collected and compiled. The websites or databases of the remaining suppliers are similarly searched in order of descending preference.
The search results are then displayed for viewing by the shopper in a plurality of lists including product information, e.g., brand and price information, for each item with a separate list being displayed for each of the respective suppliers. If items are not available from the first most preferred supplier while available from the next most preferred supplier, those items would be listed separately in the first most preferred supplier search result list as being available from the next, e.g., second, most preferred supplier from whom they could be purchased. If the desired items are not available from the first or second most preferred supplier while available from the third most favored supplier, such items would be listed separately in the first most preferred supplier search result list as being available from the next, e.g., third, most preferred supplier. Similarly, if in the search result list for the second most preferred supplier there are items not available from the second most preferred supplier, the list would indicate whether those items were available from the first most preferred supplier, from the third most preferred supplier or from other suppliers in descending order of preferred suppliers.
The shopper then chooses one search list of goods, and places an order for the entire list of items at one time. Alternatively, the shopper can query for various search result listings using different criteria, and choose and place an order for goods from said different lists, for example, for price optimization. The software program then automatically places orders at the specified suppliers for all of the items in the list, and sends one confirmation to the shopper when the process is completed.
The present invention is implemented using software which can be written in many programming languages, or implemented with many data and information displaying or web-page generation tools. The present invention can be used on a global or local computer network, on a personal computer, on viewable storage media such as a CD or DVD, on a wireless telephone, on a wireless personal assistant such as a Palm Pilot, or on any type of wired or wireless device that enables digitally stored information to be viewed and internet access. Also, information displayed and viewed using the present invention can be printed, stored to other storage medium, and electronically mailed to third parties.
Numerous modifications to and alternative embodiments of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the best mode of carrying out the invention. Details of the embodiment may be varied without departing from the spirit of the invention, and the exclusive use of all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims is reserved.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5590197 | Chen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5640002 | Ruppert et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5664110 | Green et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5864845 | Voorhees et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5884281 | Smith et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940807 | Purcell | Aug 1999 | A |
5979757 | Tracy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987446 | Corey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006225 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012055 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023683 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6101482 | DiAngelo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115690 | Wong | Sep 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6188991 | Rosenweig et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204763 | Sone | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246998 | Matsumori | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272472 | Danneels et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6324522 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6324534 | Neal et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341271 | Salvo et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345273 | Cochran | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370527 | Singhal | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381597 | Lin | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421675 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6578014 | Murcko, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6636848 | Aridor et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6711586 | Wells | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6785671 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7062487 | Nagaishi et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7080070 | Gavarini | Jul 2006 | B1 |
20020156685 | Ehrlich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030144911 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |