This application includes material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for selecting and presenting media on a network and, more particularly, to systems and methods for selecting and presenting media on a network to tune an environment to the tastes of the users within that environment, thus improving the experience of that location.
A great deal of information is generated when people use electronic devices, such as when people use mobile phones and cable set-top boxes. Such information, such as location, applications used, social network, physical and online locations visited, to name a few, could be used to deliver useful services and information to end users, and provide commercial opportunities to advertisers and retailers. However, most of this information is effectively abandoned due to deficiencies in the way such information can be captured. For example, and with respect to a mobile phone, information is generally not gathered while the mobile phone is idle (i.e., not being used by a user). Other information, such as presence of others in the immediate vicinity, time and frequency of messages to other users, and activities of a user's social network are also not captured effectively.
In one embodiment, the invention is directed to a method. The physical location of a media presentation device is received over a network. The physical location of a plurality of users is identified via the network, wherein each of plurality of users are each associated with a plurality of media files stored on the network. At least one of the plurality of end users that are within a defined proximity to the media presentation device are identified via the network. At least one media file associated with the plurality of end users is selected via the network. Selected media files are transmitted over the network to the media presentation device.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a system comprising: a location tracking module that tracks, via a network, the spatial location of a plurality of entities, wherein at least one of the plurality of entities is associated with a media presentation device; a proximity correlation module that determines if any of the plurality of entities are within a defined proximity to the media presentation device; a playlist generation module that generates playlists containing at least one media file stored on the network, wherein the at least one media file is associated with entities which are within the defined proximity to the media presentation device; and a media delivery module that delivers media contained in the playlist to the media presentation device.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the various views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating principles of the invention.
The present invention is described below with reference to block diagrams and operational illustrations of methods and devices to select and present media related to a specific topic. It is understood that each block of the block diagrams or operational illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or operational illustrations, can be implemented by means of analog or digital hardware and computer program instructions.
These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, ASIC, or other programmable data processing apparatus, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, implements the functions/acts specified in the block diagrams or operational block or blocks.
In some alternate implementations, the functions/acts noted in the blocks can occur out of the order noted in the operational illustrations. For example, two blocks shown in succession can in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks can sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
For the purposes of this disclosure the term “server” should be understood to refer to a service point which provides processing, database, and communication facilities. By way of example, and not limitation, the term “server” can refer to a single, physical processor with associated communications and data storage and database facilities, or it can refer to a networked or clustered complex of processors and associated network and storage devices, as well as operating software and one or more database systems and applications software which support the services provided by the server.
For the purposes of this disclosure the term “end user” or “user” should be understood to refer to a consumer of data supplied by a data provider. By way of example, and not limitation, the term “end user” can refer to a person who receives data provided by the data provider over the Internet in a browser session, or can refer to an automated software application which receives the data and stores or processes the data.
For the purposes of this disclosure the term “media” and “media content” should be understood to refer to binary data which contains content which can be of interest to an end user. By way of example, and not limitation, the term “media” and “media content” can refer to multimedia data, such as video data or audio data, or any other form of data capable of being transformed into a form perceivable by an end user. Such data can, furthermore, be encoded in any manner currently known, or which can be developed in the future, for specific purposes. By way of example, and not limitation, the data can be encrypted, compressed, and/or can contained embedded metadata.
For the purposes of this disclosure, a computer readable medium stores computer data in machine readable form. By way of example, and not limitation, a computer readable medium can comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid-state memory technology, CD-ROM, DVD, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other mass storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
For the purposes of this disclosure a module is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality, or component thereof, that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation). A module can include sub-modules. Software components of a module may be stored on a computer readable medium. Modules may be integral to one or more servers, or be loaded and executed by one or more servers. One or more modules may grouped into an application or an engine.
For the purposes of this disclosure an engine is a software, hardware, or firmware (or combinations thereof) system, process or functionality that performs or facilitates the processes, features, and/or functions described herein (with or without human interaction or augmentation).
Embodiments of the present invention utilize information provided by a network that is capable of providing data collected and stored by multiple devices on a network. Such information may include, without limitation, temporal information, spatial information, and user information relating to a specific user or hardware device. User information may include, without limitation, user demographics, user preferences, user social networks, and user behavior. One embodiment of such a network is a W4 Communications Network.
A “W4 Communications Network” or W4 COMN, provides information related to the “Who, What, When and Where” of interactions within the network. In one embodiment, the W4 COMN is a collection of users, devices and processes that foster both synchronous and asynchronous communications between users and their proxies providing an instrumented network of sensors providing data recognition and collection in real-world environments about any subject, location, user or combination thereof.
In one embodiment, the W4 COMN can handle the routing/addressing, scheduling, filtering, prioritization, replying, forwarding, storing, deleting, privacy, transacting, triggering of a new message, propagating changes, transcoding and linking. Furthermore, these actions can be performed on any communication channel accessible by the W4 COMN.
In one embodiment, the W4 COMN uses a data modeling strategy for creating profiles for not only users and locations, but also any device on the network and any kind of user-defined data with user-specified conditions. Using Social, Spatial, Temporal and Logical data available about a specific user, topic or logical data object, every entity known to the W4 COMN can be mapped and represented against all other known entities and data objects in order to create both a micro graph for every entity as well as a global graph that relates all known entities with one another.
In one embodiment, a W4 COMN network relates to what may be termed “real-world entities”, hereinafter referred to as RWEs. A RWE refers to, without limitation, a person, device, location, or other physical thing known to a W4 COMN. In one embodiment, each RWE known to a W4 COMN is assigned a unique W4 identification number that identifies the RWE within the W4 COMN.
RWEs can interact with the network directly or through proxies, which can themselves be RWEs. Examples of RWEs that interact directly with the W4 COMN include any device such as a sensor, motor, or other piece of hardware connected to the W4 COMN in order to receive or transmit data or control signals. RWE may include all devices that can serve as network nodes or generate, request and/or consume data in a networked environment or that can be controlled through a network. Such devices include any kind of “dumb” device purpose-designed to interact with a network (e.g., cell phones, cable television set top boxes, fax machines, telephones, and radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, sensors, etc.).
Examples of RWEs that may use proxies to interact with W4 COMN network include non-electronic entities including physical entities, such as people, locations (e.g., states, cities, houses, buildings, airports, roads, etc.) and things (e.g., animals, pets, livestock, gardens, physical objects, cars, airplanes, works of art, etc.), and intangible entities such as business entities, legal entities, groups of people or sports teams. In addition, “smart” devices (e.g., computing devices such as smart phones, smart set top boxes, smart cars that support communication with other devices or networks, laptop computers, personal computers, server computers, satellites, etc.) may be considered RWE that use proxies to interact with the network, where software applications executing on the device that serve as the devices' proxies.
In one embodiment, a W4 COMN may allow associations between RWEs to be determined and tracked. For example, a given user (an RWE) can be associated with any number and type of other RWEs including other people, cell phones, smart credit cards, personal data assistants, email and other communication service accounts, networked computers, smart appliances, set top boxes and receivers for cable television and other media services, and any other networked device. This association can be made explicitly by the user, such as when the RWE is installed into the W4 COMN.
An example of this is the set up of a new cell phone, cable television service or email account in which a user explicitly identifies an RWE (e.g., the user's phone for the cell phone service, the user's set top box and/or a location for cable service, or a username and password for the online service) as being directly associated with the user. This explicit association can include the user identifying a specific relationship between the user and the RWE (e.g., this is my device, this is my home appliance, this person is my friend/father/son/etc., this device is shared between me and other users, etc.). RWEs can also be implicitly associated with a user based on a current situation. For example, a weather sensor on the W4 COMN can be implicitly associated with a user based on information indicating that the user lives or is passing near the sensor's location.
In one embodiment, a W4 COMN network may additionally include what may be termed “information-objects”, hereinafter referred to as IOs. An information object (IO) is a logical object that may store, maintain, generate or otherwise provides data for use by RWEs and/or the W4 COMN. In one embodiment, data within in an IO can be revised by the act of an RWE An IO within in a W4 COMN can be provided a unique W4 identification number that identifies the IO within the W4 COMN.
In one embodiment, IOs include passive objects such as communication signals (e.g., digital and analog telephone signals, streaming media and interprocess communications), email messages, transaction records, virtual cards, event records (e.g., a data file identifying a time, possibly in combination with one or more RWEs such as users and locations, that can further be associated with a known topic/activity/significance such as a concert, rally, meeting, sporting event, etc.), recordings of phone calls, calendar entries, web pages, database entries, electronic media objects (e.g., media files containing songs, videos, pictures, images, audio messages, phone calls, etc.), electronic files and associated metadata.
In one embodiment, IOs include any executing process or application that consumes or generates data such as an email communication application (such as OUTLOOK by MICROSOFT, or YAHOO! MAIL by YAHOO!), a calendaring application, a word processing application, an image editing application, a media player application, a weather monitoring application, a browser application and a web page server application. Such active IOs can or can not serve as a proxy for one or more RWEs. For example, voice communication software on a smart phone can serve as the proxy for both the smart phone and for the owner of the smart phone.
In one embodiment, for every IO there are at least three classes of associated RWEs. The first is the RWE that owns or controls the IO, whether as the creator or a rights holder (e.g., an RWE with editing rights or use rights to the IO). The second is the RWE(s) that the IO relates to, for example by containing information about the RWE or that identifies the RWE. The third are any RWEs that access the IO in order to obtain data from the IO for some purpose.
Within the context of a W4 COMN, “available data” and “W4 data” means data that exists in an IO or data that can be collected from a known IO or RWE such as a deployed sensor. Within the context of a W4 COMN, “sensor” means any source of W4 data including PCs, phones, portable PCs or other wireless devices, household devices, cars, appliances, security scanners, video surveillance, RFID tags in clothes, products and locations, online data or any other source of information about a real-world user/topic/thing (RWE) or logic-based agent/process/topic/thing (IO).
In one embodiment, the proxy devices 104, 106, 108, 110 can be explicitly associated with the user 102. For example, one device 104 can be a smart phone connected by a cellular service provider to the network and another device 106 can be a smart vehicle that is connected to the network. Other devices can be implicitly associated with the user 102.
For example, one device 108 can be a “dumb” weather sensor at a location matching the current location of the user's cell phone 104, and thus implicitly associated with the user 102 while the two RWEs 104, 108 are co-located. Another implicitly associated device 110 can be a sensor 110 for physical location 112 known to the W4 COMN. The location 112 is known, either explicitly (through a user-designated relationship, e.g., this is my home, place of employment, parent, etc.) or implicitly (the user 102 is often co-located with the RWE 112 as evidenced by data from the sensor 110 at that location 112), to be associated with the first user 102.
The user 102 can be directly associated with one or more persons 140, and indirectly associated with still more persons 142, 144 through a chain of direct associations. Such associations can be explicit (e.g., the user 102 can have identified the associated person 140 as his/her father, or can have identified the person 140 as a member of the user's social network) or implicit (e.g., they share the same address). Tracking the associations between people (and other RWEs as well) allows the creation of the concept of “intimacy”, where intimacy may be defined as a measure of the degree of association between two people or RWEs. For example, each degree of removal between RWEs can be considered a lower level of intimacy, and assigned lower intimacy score. Intimacy can be based solely on explicit social data or can be expanded to include all W4 data including spatial data and temporal data.
In one embodiment, each RWE 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 140, 142, 144 of a W4 COMN can be associated with one or more IOs as shown.
The IOs 122, 124 can be locally stored on the device 104 or stored remotely on some node or datastore accessible to the W4 COMN, such as a message server or cell phone service datacenter. The IO 126 associated with the vehicle 108 can be an electronic file containing the specifications and/or current status of the vehicle 108, such as make, model, identification number, current location, current speed, current condition, current owner, etc. The IO 128 associated with sensor 108 can identify the current state of the subject(s) monitored by the sensor 108, such as current weather or current traffic. The IO 130 associated with the cell phone 110 can be information in a database identifying recent calls or the amount of charges on the current bill.
RWEs which can only interact with the W4 COMN through proxies, such as people 102, 140, 142, 144, computing devices 104, 106 and locations 112, can have one or more IOs 132, 134, 146, 148, 150 directly associated with them which contain RWE-specific information for the associated RWE. For example, IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 can include a user profile containing email addresses, telephone numbers, physical addresses, user preferences, identification of devices and other RWEs associated with the user. The IOs may additionally include records of the user's past interactions with other RWE's on the W4 COMN (e.g., transaction records, copies of messages, listings of time and location combinations recording the user's whereabouts in the past), the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location and/or any relationship information (e.g., explicit user-designations of the user's relationships with relatives, employers, co-workers, neighbors, service providers, etc.).
Another example of IOs associated with a person 132, 146, 148, 150 includes remote applications through which a person can communicate with the W4 COMN such as an account with a web-based email service such as Yahoo! Mail. A location's IO 134 can contain information such as the exact coordinates of the location, driving directions to the location, a classification of the location (residence, place of business, public, non-public, etc.), information about the services or products that can be obtained at the location, the unique W4 COMN identifier for the location, businesses located at the location, photographs of the location, etc.
In one embodiment, RWEs and IOs are correlated to identify relationships between them. RWEs and IOs may be correlated using metadata. For example, if an IO is a music file, metadata for the file can include data identifying the artist, song, etc., album art, and the format of the music data. This metadata can be stored as part of the music file or in one or more different IOs that are associated with the music file or both. W4 metadata can additionally include the owner of the music file and the rights the owner has in the music file. As another example, if the IO is a picture taken by an electronic camera, the picture can include in addition to the primary image data from which an image can be created on a display, metadata identifying when the picture was taken, where the camera was when the picture was taken, what camera took the picture, who, if anyone, is associated (e.g., designated as the camera's owner) with the camera, and who and what are the subjects of/in the picture. The W4 COMN uses all the available metadata in order to identify implicit and explicit associations between entities and data objects.
Some of items of metadata 206, 214, on the other hand, can identify relationships between the IO 202 and other RWEs and IOs. As illustrated, the IO 202 is associated by one item of metadata 206 with an RWE 220 that RWE 220 is further associated with two IOs 224, 226 and a second RWE 222 based on some information known to the W4 COMN. For example, could describe the relations between an image (IO 202) containing metadata 206 that identifies the electronic camera (the first RWE 220) and the user (the second RWE 224) that is known by the system to be the owner of the camera 220. Such ownership information can be determined, for example, from one or another of the IOs 224, 226 associated with the camera 220.
In the Where cloud 304 are all physical locations, events, sensors or other RWEs associated with a spatial reference point or location. The When cloud 306 is composed of natural temporal events (that is events that are not associated with particular location or person such as days, times, seasons) as well as collective user temporal events (holidays, anniversaries, elections, etc.) and user-defined temporal events (birthdays, smart-timing programs).
The What cloud 308 is comprised of all known data—web or private, commercial or user—accessible to the W4 COMN, including for example environmental data like weather and news, RWE-generated data, IOs and IO data, user data, models, processes and applications. Thus, conceptually, most data is contained in the What cloud 308.
Some entities, sensors or data may potentially exist in multiple clouds either disparate in time or simultaneously. Additionally, some IOs and RWEs can be composites in that they combine elements from one or more clouds. Such composites can be classified as appropriate to facilitate the determination of associations between RWEs and IOs. For example, an event consisting of a location and time could be equally classified within the When cloud 306, the What cloud 308 and/or the Where cloud 304.
In one embodiment, a W4 engine 310 is center of the W4 COMN's intelligence for making all decisions in the W4 COMN. The W4 engine 310 controls all interactions between each layer of the W4 COMN and is responsible for executing any approved user or application objective enabled by W4 COMN operations or interoperating applications. In an embodiment, the W4 COMN is an open platform with standardized, published APIs for requesting (among other things) synchronization, disambiguation, user or topic addressing, access rights, prioritization or other value-based ranking, smart scheduling, automation and topical, social, spatial or temporal alerts.
One function of the W4 COMN is to collect data concerning all communications and interactions conducted via the W4 COMN, which can include storing copies of IOs and information identifying all RWEs and other information related to the IOs (e.g., who, what, when, where information). Other data collected by the W4 COMN can include information about the status of any given RWE and IO at any given time, such as the location, operational state, monitored conditions (e.g., for an RWE that is a weather sensor, the current weather conditions being monitored or for an RWE that is a cell phone, its current location based on the cellular towers it is in contact with) and current status.
The W4 engine 310 is also responsible for identifying RWEs and relationships between RWEs and IOs from the data and communication streams passing through the W4 COMN. The function of identifying RWEs associated with or implicated by IOs and actions performed by other RWEs may be referred to as entity extraction. Entity extraction can include both simple actions, such as identifying the sender and receivers of a particular IO, and more complicated analyses of the data collected by and/or available to the W4 COMN, for example determining that a message listed the time and location of an upcoming event and associating that event with the sender and receiver(s) of the message based on the context of the message or determining that an RWE is stuck in a traffic jam based on a correlation of the RWE's location with the status of a co-located traffic monitor.
It should be noted that when performing entity extraction from an IO, the IO can be an opaque object with only where only W4 metadata related to the object is visible, but internal data of the IO (i.e., the actual primary or object data contained within the object) are not, and thus metadata extraction is limited to the metadata. Alternatively, if internal data of the IO is visible, it can also be used in entity extraction, e.g. strings within an email are extracted and associated as RWEs to for use in determining the relationships between the sender, user, topic or other RWE or IO impacted by the object or process.
In the embodiment shown, the W4 engine 310 can be one or a group of distributed computing devices, such as a general-purpose personal computers (PCs) or purpose built server computers, connected to the W4 COMN by communication hardware and/or software. Such computing devices can be a single device or a group of devices acting together. Computing devices can be provided with any number of program modules and data files stored in a local or remote mass storage device and local memory (e.g., RAM) of the computing device. For example, as mentioned above, a computing device can include an operating system suitable for controlling the operation of a networked computer, such as the WINDOWS XP or WINDOWS SERVER operating systems from MICROSOFT CORPORATION.
Some RWEs can also be computing devices such as, without limitation, smart phones, web-enabled appliances, PCs, laptop computers, and personal data assistants (PDAs). Computing devices can be connected to one or more communications networks such as the Internet, a publicly switched telephone network, a cellular telephone network, a satellite communication network, a wired communication network such as a cable television or private area network. Computing devices can be connected any such network via a wired data connection or wireless connection such as a wi-fi, a WiMAX (802.36), a Bluetooth or a cellular telephone connection.
Local data structures, including discrete IOs, can be stored on a computer-readable medium (not shown) that is connected to, or part of, any of the computing devices described herein including the W4 engine 310. For example, in one embodiment, the data backbone of the W4 COMN, discussed below, includes multiple mass storage devices that maintain the IOs, metadata and data necessary to determine relationships between RWEs and IOs as described herein.
The data layer 406 stores and catalogs the data produced by the sensor layer 402. The data can be managed by either the network 404 of sensors or the network infrastructure 406 that is built on top of the instrumented network of users, devices, agents, locations, processes and sensors. The network infrastructure 408 is the core under-the-covers network infrastructure that includes the hardware and software necessary to receive that transmit data from the sensors, devices, etc. of the network 404. It further includes the processing and storage capability necessary to meaningfully categorize and track the data created by the network 404.
The user profiling layer 410 performs the W4 COMN's user profiling functions. This layer 410 can further be distributed between the network infrastructure 408 and user applications/processes 412 executing on the W4 engine or disparate user computing devices. Personalization is enabled across any single or combination of communication channels and modes including email, IM, texting (SMS, etc.), photobloging, audio (e.g. telephone call), video (teleconferencing, live broadcast), games, data confidence processes, security, certification or any other W4 COMM process call for available data.
In one embodiment, the user profiling layer 410 is a logic-based layer above all sensors to which sensor data are sent in the rawest form to be mapped and placed into the W4 COMN data backbone 420. The data (collected and refined, related and deduplicated, synchronized and disambiguated) are then stored in one or a collection of related databases available applications approved on the W4 COMN. Network-originating actions and communications are based upon the fields of the data backbone, and some of these actions are such that they themselves become records somewhere in the backbone, e.g. invoicing, while others, e.g. fraud detection, synchronization, disambiguation, can be done without an impact to profiles and models within the backbone.
Actions originating from outside the network, e.g., RWEs such as users, locations, proxies and processes, come from the applications layer 414 of the W4 COMN. Some applications can be developed by the W4 COMN operator and appear to be implemented as part of the communications infrastructure 408, e.g. email or calendar programs because of how closely they operate with the sensor processing and user profiling layer 410. The applications 412 also serve as a sensor in that they, through their actions, generate data back to the data layer 406 via the data backbone concerning any data created or available due to the applications execution.
In one embodiment, the applications layer 414 can also provide a user interface (UI) based on device, network, carrier as well as user-selected or security-based customizations. Any UI can operate within the W4 COMN if it is instrumented to provide data on user interactions or actions back to the network. In the case of W4 COMN enabled mobile devices, the UI can also be used to confirm or disambiguate incomplete W4 data in real-time, as well as correlation, triangulation and synchronization sensors for other nearby enabled or non-enabled devices.
At some point, the network effects of enough enabled devices allow the network to gather complete or nearly complete data (sufficient for profiling and tracking) of a non-enabled device because of its regular intersection and sensing by enabled devices in its real-world location.
Above the applications layer 414, or hosted within it, is the communications delivery network 416. The communications delivery network can be operated by the W4 COMN operator or be independent third-party carrier service. Data may be delivered via synchronous or asynchronous communication. In every case, the communication delivery network 414 will be sending or receiving data on behalf of a specific application or network infrastructure 408 request.
The communication delivery layer 418 also has elements that act as sensors including W4 entity extraction from phone calls, emails, blogs, etc. as well as specific user commands within the delivery network context. For example, “save and prioritize this call” said before end of call can trigger a recording of the previous conversation to be saved and for the W4 entities within the conversation to analyzed and increased in weighting prioritization decisions in the personalization/user profiling layer 410.
In one embodiment the W4 engine connects, interoperates and instruments all network participants through a series of sub-engines that perform different operations in the entity extraction process. The attribution engine 504 tracks the real-world ownership, control, publishing or other conditional rights of any RWE in any IO. Whenever a new IO is detected by the W4 engine 502, e.g., through creation or transmission of a new message, a new transaction record, a new image file, etc., ownership is assigned to the IO. The attribution engine 504 creates this ownership information and further allows this information to be determined for each IO known to the W4 COMN.
The correlation engine 506 can operates two capacities: first, to identify associated RWEs and IOs and their relationships (such as by creating a combined graph of any combination of RWEs and IOs and their attributes, relationships and reputations within contexts or situations) and second, as a sensor analytics pre-processor for attention events from any internal or external source.
In one embodiment, the identification of associated RWEs and IOs function of the correlation engine 506 is done by graphing the available data, using, for example, one or more histograms A histogram is a mapping technique that counts the number of observations that fall into various disjoint categories (i.e. bins). By selecting each IO, RWE, and other known parameters (e.g., times, dates, locations, etc.) as different bins and mapping the available data, relationships between RWEs, IOs and the other parameters can be identified. A histogram of all RWEs and IOs is created, from which correlations based on the graph can be made.
As a pre-processor, the correlation engine 506 monitors the information provided by RWEs in order to determine if any conditions are identified that can trigger an action on the part of the W4 engine 502. For example, if a delivery condition has been associated with a message, when the correlation engine 506 determines that the condition is met, it can transmit the appropriate trigger information to the W4 engine 502 that triggers delivery of the message.
The attention engine 508 instruments all appropriate network nodes, clouds, users, applications or any combination thereof and includes close interaction with both the correlation engine 506 and the attribution engine 504.
The attention engine 608 includes a message intake and generation manager 610 as well as a message delivery manager 612 that work closely with both a message matching manager 614 and a real-time communications manager 616 to deliver and instrument all communications across the W4 COMN.
The attribution engine 604 works within the user profile manager 618 and in conjunction with all other modules to identify, process/verify and represent ownership and rights information related to RWEs, IOs and combinations thereof.
The correlation engine 606 dumps data from both of its channels (sensors and processes) into the same data backbone 620 which is organized and controlled by the W4 analytics manager 622. The data backbone 620 includes both aggregated and individualized archived versions of data from all network operations including user logs 624, attention rank place logs 626, web indices and environmental logs 618, e-commerce and financial transaction information 630, search indexes and logs 632, sponsor content or conditionals, ad copy and any and all other data used in any W4 COMN process, IO or event. Because of the amount of data that the W4 COMN will potentially store, the data backbone 620 includes numerous database servers and datastores in communication with the W4 COMN to provide sufficient storage capacity.
The data collected by the W4 COMN includes spatial data, temporal data, RWE interaction data, IO content data (e.g., media data), and user data including explicitly-provided and deduced social and relationship data. Spatial data can be any data identifying a location associated with an RWE. For example, the spatial data can include any passively collected location data, such as cell tower data, global packet radio service (GPRS) data, global positioning service (GPS) data, WI-FI data, personal area network data, IP address data and data from other network access points, or actively collected location data, such as location data entered by the user.
Temporal data is time based data (e.g., time stamps) that relate to specific times and/or events associated with a user and/or the electronic device. For example, the temporal data can be passively collected time data (e.g., time data from a clock resident on the electronic device, or time data from a network clock), or the temporal data can be actively collected time data, such as time data entered by the user of the electronic device (e.g., a user maintained calendar).
Logical and IO data refers to the data contained by an IO as well as data associated with the IO such as creation time, owner, associated RWEs, when the IO was last accessed, etc. For example, an IO may relate to media data. Media data can include any data relating to presentable media, such as audio data, visual data, and audiovisual data. Audio data can be data relating to downloaded music, such as genre, artist, album and the like, and includes data regarding ringtones, ringbacks, media purchased, playlists, and media shared, to name a few. The visual data can be data relating to images and/or text received by the electronic device (e.g., via the Internet or other network). The visual data can be data relating to images and/or text sent from and/or captured at the electronic device,
Audiovisual data can be data associated with any videos captured at, downloaded to, or otherwise associated with the electronic device. The media data includes media presented to the user via a network, such as use of the Internet, and includes data relating to text entered and/or received by the user using the network (e.g., search terms), and interaction with the network media, such as click data (e.g., advertisement banner clicks, bookmarks, click patterns and the like). Thus, the media data can include data relating to the user's RSS feeds, subscriptions, group memberships, game services, alerts, and the like.
The media data can include non-network activity, such as image capture and/or video capture using an electronic device, such as a mobile phone. The image data can include metadata added by the user, or other data associated with the image, such as, with respect to photos, location when the photos were taken, direction of the shot, content of the shot, and time of day, to name a few. Media data can be used, for example, to deduce activities information or preferences information, such as cultural and/or buying preferences information.
Relationship data can include data relating to the relationships of an RWE or IO to another RWE or IO. For example, the relationship data can include user identity data, such as gender, age, race, name, social security number, photographs and other information associated with the user's identity. User identity information can also include e-mail addresses, login names and passwords. Relationship data can further include data identifying explicitly associated RWEs. For example, relationship data for a cell phone can indicate the user that owns the cell phone and the company that provides the service to the phone. As another example, relationship data for a smart car can identify the owner, a credit card associated with the owner for payment of electronic tolls, those users permitted to drive the car and the service station for the car.
Relationship data can also include social network data. Social network data includes data relating to any relationship that is explicitly defined by a user or other RWE, such as data relating to a user's friends, family, co-workers, business relations, and the like. Social network data can include, for example, data corresponding with a user-maintained electronic address book. Relationship data can be correlated with, for example, location data to deduce social network information, such as primary relationships (e.g., user-spouse, user-children and user-parent relationships) or other relationships (e.g., user-friends, user-co-worker, user-business associate relationships). Relationship data also can be utilized to deduce, for example, activities information.
Interaction data can be any data associated with user interaction of the electronic device, whether active or passive. Examples of interaction data include interpersonal communication data, media data, relationship data, transactional data and device interaction data, all of which are described in further detail below. Table 1, below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of electronic data.
Interaction data includes communication data between any RWEs that is transferred via the W4 COMN. For example, the communication data can be data associated with an incoming or outgoing short message service (SMS) message, email message, voice call (e.g., a cell phone call, a voice over IP call), or other type of interpersonal communication related to an RWE. Communication data can be correlated with, for example, temporal data to deduce information regarding frequency of communications, including concentrated communication patterns, which can indicate user activity information.
The interaction data can also include transactional data. The transactional data can be any data associated with commercial transactions undertaken by or at the mobile electronic device, such as vendor information, financial institution information (e.g., bank information), financial account information (e.g., credit card information), merchandise information and costs/prices information, and purchase frequency information, to name a few. The transactional data can be utilized, for example, to deduce activities and preferences information. The transactional information can also be used to deduce types of devices and/or services the user owns and/or in which the user can have an interest.
The interaction data can also include device or other RWE interaction data. Such data includes both data generated by interactions between a user and a RWE on the W4 COMN and interactions between the RWE and the W4 COMN. RWE interaction data can be any data relating to an RWE's interaction with the electronic device not included in any of the above categories, such as habitual patterns associated with use of an electronic device data of other modules/applications, such as data regarding which applications are used on an electronic device and how often and when those applications are used. As described in further detail below, device interaction data can be correlated with other data to deduce information regarding user activities and patterns associated therewith. Table 2, below, is a non-exhaustive list including examples of interaction data.
Location Based Media Delivery
Music and media of other type are often used by businesses to draw, retain, and entertain customers. For example, restaurants and retailers, among others, use ambient music to make their customer's dining or shopping experience more enjoyable. At nightclubs and lounges, music, videos, and images may be part of the entertainment supplied by such establishments. Businesses select media for play that they believe will appeal most to their customer base. Such selection may be made by selecting an available radio stations, an available Muzac channel, creating custom mix CDs, or even a live DJ.
Such selections are, however, only an approximation. Businesses may know the demographics of their customer base, but they do not know who, that is to say, what specific individuals, are in a business location at any time or over time. Moreover, even if a business has some idea of who is in a business location, the business may have little concept of what the individual preferences of each individual are. Ideally, a business may wish to vary the content of media played within a location, tailoring the media to the preferences of persons at the location.
For example, a restaurant may wish to vary the ambient music played in the coffee house such that, when the customer group is predominantly older white collar workers, such as at breakfast and lunchtime, the background music is composed of favorite songs of such customers from the 1970's and 1980's. When, later at night, the crowd is under 30, the business may prefer to play background music composed of current music released by the favorite groups of the customers then onsite. Beyond tracking the taste's of the “average” customer, they can track the taste's of actual customers in real-time and adjust the media being displayed on-site to suit the tastes of the totality, a majority or even just a VIP group or sub-group depending on the context and user's involved.
Such concepts are useful at home as well. For example, if a person is having a party at his or her house, he or she may wish to play the favorite music of the guests. A family may wish to play a mix of music that reflects the tastes of the family members currently at hone. In every case mentioned above, the presence of specific individuals at a location cause the mix of media played at the location to respond to the preferences and personality of those individuals.
A business might also wish to influence the music played on individual's personal media players when such individuals are in, or near a business's location. For example, a business wish to allow potential customers who come within close proximity to one of the business's location to experience the music played at the location on the user's personal media player, or within the location a specific channel or playlist is personalized for that user's device to receive, display and/or broadcast.
Such concepts may be further extended to the individual users. For example, when two friends are in close proximity to one another, they may wish to have personal theme songs played on each other's portable media player. In general, in such cases, the presence of an individual at or near a business location or another individual causes the mix of media played on the individual's personal media player to respond to the presence of the business or the other individual.
The embodiments of the present invention discussed below illustrate application of the present invention within a W4 COMN. Nevertheless, it is understood that the invention can be implemented using any networked system in which is capable of tracking the physical location of users and media enabled electronic devices, and which is further capable of collecting and storing user profile data, as well as temporal, spatial, topical and social data relating to users and their devices.
A W4 COMN can provide a platform that enables music played at a location to vary with the mix of individuals present at the location on a real-time or near time basis. A W4 COMN can also provide a platform that enables music played on an individual's portable media devices to respond to nearby business locations or other individuals. The W4 COMN is able to achieve such a result, in part, because the W4 COMN is aware of the physical location of persons and places, and is further aware of the media preferences of such persons and places and their relationship to one another. The W4 COMN also has access to aggregated users data profiles and behavior patterns overtime against which to map or compare new events in specific contexts to validate, modify or derive data values for consideration in the selection or presentation of media files to users.
In the illustrated embodiment, a business or an individual 710 has a bounded physical location, such as, for example, a building, a room within a building, a house, an apartment, or an open-air location. The location 710 has an entertainment system 712 which includes a sound reproduction system 714 for playing ambient music. The entertainment presentation system could be additionally configured for the presentation of media including videos, images, as well as special effects such as smoke and light shows. The geographical position of the entertainment system 712 can be determined by GPS sensors within the device or by any other position determination technique, such as triangulation of cellular signals. Alternatively, the geographical position of the device may be known through a one-time measurement or position determination. The entertainment system may additionally contain sensors, such as temperature sensors, motion sensors, spatial orientation sensors or volume or noise level sensors.
Within the location 710 are two individuals 720 and 730. Each of the individuals has a programmable cell phone 722 and 732 and a portable media player 724 and 734. The geographical position of the cell phones 722 and 732 and the portable media players 724 and 734 can be determined by GPS sensors within the devices or by any other position determination technique, such as triangulation of cellular signals transmitted by the devices. Any of the devices may contain additional environmental sensors, such as temperature sensors, or biometric sensors, such as heart rate or blood pressure monitors. The individuals 720 and 730 are within sight of one another, and can communicate with one another, for example, using their cell phones, or can come within speaking distance of one another.
Outside the location 710, a third individual 740 is traveling past the location. The individual has a programmable cell phone 742 and a portable media player 744. The geographical position of the cell phones 742 and the portable media player 744 can be determined by GPS sensors within the devices or by any other position determination technique, such as triangulation of cellular signals. Any of the devices may contain additional environmental sensors, such as temperature, or biometric sensors, such as heart rate or blood pressure monitors. The individual 740 is within sight of the location 710, and can enter the location if he or she so chooses.
The entertainment system 712 and the user devices 722, 724, 732, 734, 742, and 744 are connected to a W4 COMN through network interfaces such as cellular connections or wireless Internet connections. The devices are defined to the W4 COMN and can be considered components of the W4 COMN. The devices send and receive information from the W4 COMN. In one embodiment, an attention engine within a W4 engine (not shown) tracks the location of devices 712, 724, 732, 734, 742, and 744. The devices 712, 724, 732, 734, 742, and 744 may be capable of sending geographic position information to the attention engine, or, alternatively, the attention engine may determine the position of the devices using, for example, triangulation of cellular signals. The W4 COMN can also monitor communications sent and received by user devices and track interaction data for all the devices.
One or more data services 780 which are external to the W4 COMN are attached to the network and provide additional data regarding entities and objects known to the W4 COMN. Examples of such data services are social networking sites, such as Facebook and media metadata sites.
In the illustrated embodiment, the two user RWE 820 and 830 are associated with one another, for example, through a social networking site. For example, the two users may be friends within a social network. Additionally, or alternatively, the user profiles associated with each user RWE 820 and 830 may list the other individual as a contact or friend. The user RWEs may also be related to each other through other IOs, for example, an IO relating to a topic (i.e. the individuals are interested in the same music.) In the illustrated embodiment, user RWEs 820 and 830 are also currently associated with an IO relating to a topic 852 corresponding to the fact that the individuals are both physically present in a location associated with business RWE 810.
Each user RWE 820 and 830 can be associated with IOs relating to topics that reflect the individual's musical interests. For example, if RWE 820 and 830, are each interested in a specific artist, such interest is reflected as an association with an IO relating to a topic 826 and 836 respectively. The IO relating to a topics 826 and 836 are each associated with a group of media objects, 871, 872, 873, and 874, 875, 876 respectively. The media objects are songs, videos or other media relating to their corresponding IO relating to topics 826 and 836. Playlists, media objects, and other IO may also be associated with proxy RWEs. For example, a playlist may be stored on, and associated with, a media player used by an individual.
The business RWE 810 is associated with a proxy RWE 812 corresponding to the entertainment system within the location. The proxy RWE for the entertainment system is associated with a playlist IO 854 which has two selections from the group of media objects associated with the user RWEs 820 and 830. The playlist IO 854 represents the playlist that the entertainment system associated with the proxy RWE 812 is currently playing. In one embodiment, the playlist IO has been tailored to contain selections of interest to both user RWEs 820 and 830.
The business RWE 810 is further associated with a second playlist IO 862 which references media objects 877, 878 and 879 which the business wishes to present to individuals outside the business as representative of music played within the location. The user RWE 840 is currently associated with an IO relating to a topic 860 corresponding to the fact that the user is outside of, but within a short distance from, the business's location. An RWE 844 corresponding to a proxy device, for example, a portable media player is associated with the user RWE 840 and the playlist IO 862. The proxy device associated with the proxy RWE 844 can use the playlist IO 862 to request delivery of media 877, 878, and 879 associated with the playlist.
In one embodiment, within a W4 COMN, the relationships shown in
Spatial data (i.e. the geographic location of devices) is periodically determined 910 for entities such as users and businesses which, within a W4 COMN can be defined to the network as sRWE. The location of users and businesses are determined through devices, such as phones or media players, which, within a W4 COMN, may be associated with proxy RWEs. In one embodiment, a location tracking module tracks the location of devices. The location of devices may be periodically transmitted by the devices to the network, or alternatively, the location of devices may be periodically derived, for example, by triangulation of a cellular signal or association with another known device or user. If a user or proxy is associated with a fixed location, for example, a business, the location may be known and defined as a constant, for example, within metadata associated with a location RWE. Spatial data for such entities is thus constant.
For every entity, it is then determined if there are any other entities of interest 920 to the entity within a defined physical and/or logical proximity to the entity. For example, it can be determined that individual users are within a physical location associated with a business, or outside of the location, but no more that 100 feet away. In another example, it can be determined that a user is within 100 feet of another user in real-space and is also in the same social network. In another example, it can be determined if a user is within 500 feet of another user with whom the user is carrying on a voice or text based conversation through user proxy devices. In one embodiment, proximity relationships are determined by a proximity correlation module within a correlation engine within a W4 engine.
In one embodiment, definitions that outline when an entity is of interest to another entity, herein referred to as proximity definitions 922, are stored within the W4 COMN. Proximity definitions 922 can be stored within a W4 COMN, for example, as IOs associated with an RWE. Any entity which falls within one or more proximity definitions of a specific entity are considered entities of interest to that specific entity. In one embodiment, lists of RWEs of interest 924 are stored within the W4 COMN as IO relating to a topics, such as, for example, 852 of
In general, proximity definitions 922 can contain criteria that relate to any type of temporal, spatial, social, or topical data. “Proximity” should be understood to refer to not only spatial proximity between two or more entities, but also can also include proximity between two entities in time, within social networks, network activities or subscriptions, or interests. Thus proximity definition can contain criteria that are purely spatial, for example, all persons within a bounded physical space (e.g. a bar or brick and mortar retailer), but may also contain more subjective criteria (e.g. users who are interested in a specific genre of music, or who are in a specific social network or members of a club.)
Proximity definitions can be dynamic and conditional (i.e. programmatic) and can respond to changes in one or more context or environmental factors. For example, if a user moves from one location to another, the media files a user is associated with can vary based upon context; a user can be associated one set of music at a bar, but another at the office. Proximity definitions can, furthermore, respond to conditions unrelated to users, e.g. an outside news event of the reporting of a singer's death might immediately preference their songs for next play if already in the playlist or for inclusion in the playlist as timely if not already included.
If no entity of interest are identified, the process waits until entities of interest are identified. When entities of interest 924 are identified 940, a playlist 954 is assembled reflecting media associated with the entities of interest 924 and specific to their present context. For example, within a W4 COMN, if user RWEs are identified within a location associated with a business having an entertainment system, a playlist 954 may be assembled 950 containing songs that are favorite songs associated with each user RWE, which are identified using an IO relating to a topic for specific music genre that are associated with each user RWE, or are on playlists associated with each user RWE or proxy RWEs. In one embodiment, playlists are built by a playlist generation module which can be within a correlation engine within a W4 engine.
The playlists and favorite songs of all users present at the location can be compared, determining overlaps, similarities, and matching tracks or styles to create a composite playlist. The playlist can additionally be filtered using filter criteria 952 to exclude media that falls within defined categories. For example, a coffee house may choose to filter out heavy metal or rap music or music having offensive lyrics. The playlist can additionally be sorted in a specific order, for example, by artist. The playlist can additionally specify that only specific tracks or sections of selected media are played. In one embodiment, filter criteria can be stored as an IO associated with an RWE.
Filter criteria can be dynamic and respond to changes detected by the network and can include any alteration of the presentation of the media file in response to such changes. Such alterations of the presentation of the media file can include, without limitation, excluding specific media files, varying the size and brightness of images displayed, or varying the volume of audio presented. For example, the streaming of adult content may be stopped when a proxy for an underage user is detected. If filter criteria are associated with a mobile end user device, a game content may be hidden when the user's supervisor is detected nearby, or the volume of audio may change as location of the device changes.
Filter criteria can further specify the ordering of the playlist. Ordering criteria can be based on any property associated with selected media files. For example, media files relating to the favorite songs of a majority of users may be ranked first. Alternatively, ordering may be based on the rank of songs on the current billboard.
In another example, if a user is identified as being outside a physical location associated with a business, a playlist may be assembled using songs preselected by the business to be played to passing users, and in one embodiment, the stationary media presentation device at the business location mixes short clips of the favorite songs of one or more mobile users as they pass-by the store. In a video example of that embodiment, a large display screen in a storefront window displays a composite stream or slideshow of pictures from the passing users' cell phones. The playlist may be built manually, or may be generated dynamically by including, for example, the last ten songs played within the business location. In one embodiment, the playlist may further specify that only a portion of every song is played, for example, only the first ten seconds of every selection may be played or that some media files are private and not available for public playlists.
In another example, if two users are found to be of interest to one another (e.g. they are friends or are currently texting each other), a playlist may be constructed for both individuals which contains favorite songs common to the users. If the users are romantically involved, the playlist may be filtered to include only romantic songs or if they are friends it can be filtered to exclude overtly romantic songs.
In one embodiment, within a W4 COMN, a playlist may be instantiated as a playlist IO owned by an RWE, such as for example, playlist IO 854 or 862 of
In one embodiment, the play of media on the playlist may be conditioned by sensor data that changes in real-time. For example, if a playlist is created for two individuals who are friends, the volume of music may increase as the two individuals move closer together, or it may be sensitive to other environmental factors like what other users are present, are they in a library or how much power consumption is needed to power higher levels of output.
With reference to both
The location based media delivery engine 1000 further includes a proximity correlation module 1200 that determines if there are any users, businesses, and other entities that are within a defined proximity to one another. In one embodiment, proximity definitions that outline spatial and other criteria that determine when users, businesses, and other entities are of interest to one another are stored on a computer readable medium 1220. In one embodiment, the resulting lists of users, businesses, and other entities that are of interest to another user, businesses, or other entity are stored on a computer readable medium 1240. In one embodiment, the proximity correlation module 1200 can be implemented as one component of correlation engine 506 within a W4 engine 502 of a W4 COMN.
The location based media delivery engine 1000 further includes a playlist generation module 1300 that generates playlists 1340 for users, businesses, and other entities for which a list of entities of interest have been found. Playlist generation module 1300 can use data related to the entities of interest, including without limitation, profile data, playlists, favorite songs or videos, and favorite media genre, social network data, and other topical data for entities of interest to generate one or more playlists or composite streams or files, e.g. slideshow or highlight reel. Such data can be compared, determining overlaps, similarities, and matching tracks or styles to create a composite playlist. The playlist generation module 1300 can additionally filter and/or order the playlist using filter criteria 1320 stored on a computer readable medium to exclude or include media that falls within defined categories, genres, artists or sources of origin. In one embodiment, the playlist generation module 1300 playlists are built by a playlist generation module can be implemented as one component of correlation engine 506 within a W4 engine 502 of a W4 COMN.
The location based media delivery engine 1000 further includes a media delivery module 1400 that delivers media contained in playlists generated for users, businesses, and other entities by the playlist generation module 1300. In one embodiment, such media is delivered to media presentation devices associated with the entities for which the playlists were generated. In one embodiment, the delivery module 1400 can be implemented as one component of a W4 engine 502 of a W4 COMN.
In one embodiment, the media delivery module is aware of changes in real-time sensor data, for example, the changes in the physical location of an entity, and adjusts play of media on the playlist. For example, if a playlist is created for two individuals who are friends, the volume of music may increase as the two individuals move closer together.
Additional Examples of Location Based Media Delivery
The disclosure will now discuss additional examples of the above principles. The examples given below are intended to be illustrative, and not limiting.
In one example of users influencing media at a location, a Starbucks has a W4 enabled entertainment system at its location feeding the ambient music and video display systems. As a number of customers enter and leave the location with W4 enabled devices, the media server at the location plays music the current set of clients will likely prefer accompanied by personalized video displays of user-generated or associated content. As the type of customer in the store changes, the type of media played over the ambient system changes—when the high school kids are in the store it will play music which appeals to that group. When the wave of soccer moms comes in, its plays a different set, and plays yet another set on the weekend when there is a more even mix of customers.
In one embodiment, the W4 COMN has historical data on the location's customers and the system may favor the preferences of regular repeat customers, big spenders or those who spend a long time at the store. Such filtering criteria can be provided by the business owner, by the network and or by the owner of the media presentation devices and/or their agents, e.g. sponsored ad agencies
In another example of users influencing media at a location, a DJ at a club is automatically delivered a list of the of the favorite music of the people currently in the club, e.g. it will appear on the DJ's Mixing Screen. The DJ can then select the music to play based from the list, or may select other tracks based on his personal judgment. The DJ can then create a playlist and play it. Alternatively, instead of a set of tracks, the system can instead create a base beat track and overlay samples of the tracks that the attendees may like, thus creating a completely new and unique track or composite stream, part of which will appeal to someone in the room at any one time.
In another example of users influencing media at a location, a user who has a W4 enabled entertainment system is throwing a party, but has no idea of the musical preferences of the guests. The user enters instructions to the W4 enabled entertainment system to play music which the guests will probably like, based on data gleaned from their playlists, as indicated by their local W4 enabled devices. Before guests arrive, the host sets the stereo to play. Initially, the entertainment system only plays the music the host likes.
As guests arrive, their presence is detected via their local W4 devices, their playlists and preferences of each guest are determined and add new tracks are added to the playlist. The host can also set filters ahead of time in order to flavor the playlist to the host's liking and the event—while a majority of the guest may like death-metal, the host may not wish to have it played at a sedate dinner party, and can specify categories of music to play. As above, the entertainment system can be set to auto-play, or simply create a list of preferred tracks to play and allow the host to select tracks to play.
In another example, imagine a scene in a film where a couple's eyes meet across a room, and romantic music starts playing in the background, and increases in volume as they move closer to each other. Such a scene could be enabled in real life using location based media delivery. For example, two single users each have their own W4 enabled device and are in the same venue, listening to their own music via headphones. A location based media delivery server detects that the two individuals are moving towards each other, it then mines both users playlists for a track that they have both tagged as “romantic” or “love”.
As they move towards each other, the track begins to play simultaneously at a low volume through their respective headphones. As they move closer, the volume increases. When get close enough to touch, the music reaches a crescendo of volume and stabilizes. The server could avoid unintentionally matching incompatible persons by only providing such functionality for persons registered with an online dating service and are nominally compatible (e.g. have at least one interest in common and are close in age.)
In an example of a location influencing music heard by a user, a church defines a W4 location activated playlist containing recordings of music performed in the church during services. When a person with a W4 enabled device travels past the church on the same street, the playlist or a track from the playlist is sent to the person's W4 enabled device.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods and systems of the present disclosure may be implemented in many manners and as such are not to be limited by the foregoing exemplary embodiments and examples. In other words, functional elements being performed by single or multiple components, in various combinations of hardware and software or firmware, and individual functions, may be distributed among software applications at either the client level or server level or both. In this regard, any number of the features of the different embodiments described herein may be combined into single or multiple embodiments, and alternate embodiments having fewer than, or more than, all of the features described herein are possible. Functionality may also be, in whole or in part, distributed among multiple components, in manners now known or to become known. Thus, myriad software/hardware/firmware combinations are possible in achieving the functions, features, interfaces and preferences described herein. Moreover, the scope of the present disclosure covers conventionally known manners for carrying out the described features and functions and interfaces, as well as those variations and modifications that may be made to the hardware or software or firmware components described herein as would be understood by those skilled in the art now and hereafter.
Furthermore, the embodiments of methods presented and described as flowcharts in this disclosure are provided by way of example in order to provide a more complete understanding of the technology. The disclosed methods are not limited to the operations and logical flow presented herein. Alternative embodiments are contemplated in which the order of the various operations is altered and in which sub-operations described as being part of a larger operation are performed independently.
While various embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, such embodiments should not be deemed to limit the teaching of this disclosure to those embodiments. Various changes and modifications may be made to the elements and operations described above to obtain a result that remains within the scope of the systems and processes described in this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5446891 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5493692 | Theimer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5583763 | Ateheson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5651068 | Klemba et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5761662 | Dasan | Jun 1998 | A |
5764906 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781879 | Arnold et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784365 | Ikeda | Jul 1998 | A |
5794210 | Goldhaber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802510 | Jones | Sep 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz | Nov 1998 | A |
5903848 | Takahashi | May 1999 | A |
5920854 | Kirsch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021403 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047234 | Cherveny et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6098065 | Skillen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112181 | Shear et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157924 | Austin | Dec 2000 | A |
6169992 | Beall et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212552 | Biliris et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266667 | Olsson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6314365 | Smith | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314399 | Deligne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324519 | Eldering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327590 | Chidlovskii et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6446065 | Nishioka et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490698 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502033 | Phuyal | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523172 | Martinez-Guerra et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6571279 | Herz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6601012 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6662195 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665640 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694316 | Langseth et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701311 | Biebesheimer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6701315 | Austin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708203 | Makar et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731940 | Nagendran | May 2004 | B1 |
6741980 | Langseth et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757661 | Blaser et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6773344 | Gabai et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781920 | Bates et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785670 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789073 | Lunenfeld | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813501 | Kinnunen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816850 | Culliss | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829333 | Frazier | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834195 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842761 | Diamond et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845370 | Burkey et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6853913 | Cherveny et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853982 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882977 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6904160 | Burgess | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6931254 | Egner et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6961660 | Underbrink et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6961731 | Holbrook | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985839 | Motamedi et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7010492 | Bassett et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027801 | Hall et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058508 | Combs et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058626 | Pan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062510 | Eldering | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065345 | Carlton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065483 | Decary et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069308 | Abrams | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073129 | Robarts et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7110776 | Sambin | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7143091 | Charnock et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149696 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181438 | Szabo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185286 | Zondervan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194512 | Creemer et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203597 | Sato et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209915 | Taboada et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7219013 | Young et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7236969 | Skillen et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7254581 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257570 | Riise et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7305445 | Singh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7320025 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343364 | Bram et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7395507 | Robarts et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404084 | Fransdonk | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7437312 | Bhatia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451102 | Nowak | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461168 | Wan | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496548 | Ershov | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7522995 | Nortrup | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529811 | Thompson | May 2009 | B2 |
7562122 | Oliver et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577665 | Rameer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584215 | Saari et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624104 | Berkhin et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624146 | Brogne et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7634465 | Sareen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657907 | Fennan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7681147 | Richardson-Bunbury et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7725492 | Sittig et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729901 | Richardson-Bunbury et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7769740 | Martinez et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769745 | Naaman | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783622 | Vandermolen et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792040 | Nair | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802724 | Nohr | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7822871 | Stolorz et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831586 | Reitter et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865308 | Athsani | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7925708 | Davis | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20010013009 | Greening et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035880 | Musatov et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047384 | Croy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052058 | Ohran | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020014742 | Conte et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019849 | Tuvey et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019857 | Harjanto | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023091 | Silberberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023230 | Bolnick et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035605 | McDowell et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049968 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052786 | Kim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052875 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054089 | Nicholas | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065844 | Robinson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069218 | Sull et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099695 | Abajian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103870 | Shouji | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111956 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112035 | Carey | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124249 | Shintani et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133400 | Terry et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138331 | Hosea et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152267 | Lennon | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169840 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173971 | Stirpe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178161 | Brezin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198786 | Tripp et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008661 | Joyce et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009367 | Morrison | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009495 | Adjaoute | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027558 | Eisinger | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033331 | Sena et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033394 | Stine et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065762 | Stolorz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069877 | Grefenstette et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069880 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078978 | Lardin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080992 | Haines | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149574 | Rudman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154293 | Zmolek | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165241 | Fransdonk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191816 | Landress et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040010492 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015588 | Cotte | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030798 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034752 | Ohran | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043758 | Sorvari et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044736 | Austin-Lane et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070602 | Kobuya et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139025 | Coleman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139047 | Rechsteiner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148341 | Cotte | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152477 | Wu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183829 | Kontny et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201683 | Murashita et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203851 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203909 | Koster | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209602 | Joyce et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243623 | Ozer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260804 | Grabamik et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267880 | Patiejunas | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005242 | Hoyle | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015451 | Sheldon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015599 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050027 | Yeh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050050043 | Pyhalammi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055321 | Fratkina | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060381 | Huynh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065950 | Chaganti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065980 | Hyatt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076060 | Finn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086187 | Grosser et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105552 | Osterling | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108213 | Riise et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120006 | Nye | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131727 | Sezan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149397 | Morgenstern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151849 | Fitzhugh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159220 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159970 | Buyukkokten et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160080 | Dawson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165699 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166240 | Kim | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171955 | Hull et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177385 | Hull et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182824 | Cotte | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183110 | Anderson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187786 | Tsai | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192025 | Kaplan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203801 | Morgenstern et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216295 | Abrahamsohn | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216300 | Appelman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219375 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234781 | Morgenstern | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273510 | Schuh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020631 | Cheong Wan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026013 | Kraft | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026067 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031108 | Oran | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040719 | Plimi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047563 | Wardell | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047615 | Ravin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053058 | Hotchkiss et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069612 | Hurt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069616 | Bau | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069749 | Herz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074853 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085392 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089876 | Boys | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116924 | Angeles et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123053 | Scannell, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129313 | Becker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129605 | Doshi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161894 | Oustiougov et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168591 | Hunsinger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173838 | Garg et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173985 | Moore | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178822 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184508 | Fuselier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184579 | Mills | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212330 | Savilampi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212401 | Ameerally et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227945 | Runge et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235816 | Yang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236257 | Othmer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242139 | Butterfield et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242178 | Butterfield et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242259 | Vallath et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258368 | Granito et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271953 | Jacoby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282455 | Lee | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013560 | Casey | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015519 | Casey | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043766 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067104 | Mays | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067267 | Ives | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072591 | McGary et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073583 | Grouf et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073641 | Perry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086061 | Robbins | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070087756 | Hoffberg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088852 | Levkovitz | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100956 | Kumar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112762 | Brubaker | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121843 | Atazky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130137 | Oliver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136048 | Richardson-Bunbury et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136235 | Hess | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136256 | Kapur et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136689 | Richardson-Bunbury et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143345 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150168 | Balcom et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150359 | Lim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155411 | Morrison | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161382 | Melinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162850 | Adler | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168430 | Brun et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173266 | Barnes | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179792 | Kramer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185599 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192299 | Zuckerberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198506 | Attaran Rezaei et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198563 | Apparao et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203591 | Bowerman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219708 | Brasche et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220566 | Ahmad-Taylor | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233585 | Ben Simon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239348 | Cheung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239517 | Chung et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259653 | Tang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260508 | Barry et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260604 | Haeuser et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271297 | Jaffe et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271340 | Goodman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273758 | Mendoza et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276940 | Abraham et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282621 | Altman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282675 | Varghese | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288278 | Alexander et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005313 | Flake et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005651 | Grefenstette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010206 | Coleman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021957 | Medved et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026804 | Baray et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028031 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040283 | Morris | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046298 | Ben-Yehuda et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080070588 | Morin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086356 | Glassman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086431 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091796 | Story et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096664 | Baray et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102911 | Campbell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104061 | Rezaei | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104227 | Bimie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109761 | Stambaugh | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109843 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114751 | Cramer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120183 | Park | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120308 | Martinez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120690 | Norlander et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133750 | Grabamik et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147655 | Sinha et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147743 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148175 | Naaman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154720 | Gounares | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163284 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172632 | Stambaugh | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177706 | Yuen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080270579 | Herz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285886 | Allen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301250 | Hardy et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320001 | Gaddam | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005987 | Vengroff et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006336 | Forstall et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012934 | Yerigan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012965 | Franken | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043844 | Zimmet et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044132 | Combel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063254 | Paul et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070186 | Buiten et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073191 | Smith et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076889 | Jhanji | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100052 | Stern et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106356 | Brase et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125517 | Krishnaswamy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132941 | Pilskalns et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144141 | Dominowska et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150501 | Davis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150507 | Davis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165051 | Armaly | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171939 | Athsani et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177603 | Honisch | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187637 | Wu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204484 | Johnson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204672 | Jetha et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204676 | Parkinson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216606 | Coffman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222302 | Higgins | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222303 | Higgins | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234814 | Boerries et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234909 | Strandeil et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249482 | Sarathy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265431 | Jania et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281997 | Jain | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299837 | Steelberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313546 | Katpelly et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320047 | Khan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323519 | Pun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328087 | Higgins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002635 | Eklund | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014444 | Ghanadan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063993 | Higgins et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070368 | Choi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100118025 | Smith et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125563 | Nair et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125569 | Nair et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125604 | Martinez et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125605 | Nair et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100185642 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1362302 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2002312559 | Oct 2002 | JP |
1020000036897 | Jul 2000 | KR |
1020000054319 | Sep 2000 | KR |
10-2000-0064105 | Nov 2000 | KR |
1020030049173 | Jun 2003 | KR |
10-0801662 | Feb 2005 | KR |
1020060043333 | May 2006 | KR |
102007034094 | Mar 2007 | KR |
1020070073180 | Jul 2007 | KR |
1020080048802 | Jun 2008 | KR |
WO2006116196 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007022137 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007027453 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070358 | Jun 2007 | WO |
W02007113546 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,668, filed Nov. 6, 2006 for Naaman, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,869, filed Nov. 6, 2006 for Naaman, et al. |
“Gutenkarte” Book Catalog, 2006 MetaCarta, Inc., www.gutenkarte.org 11pgs. |
Baron, N.S. et al. (Aug. 30, 2005). “Tethered or Mobile? Use of Away Messages in Instant Messaging by American College Students,” Chapter 20.1 in Mobile Communication, Springer: London, England, 31:293-297. |
Jones, C. et al. (2004). “Ad-Hoc Meeting System,” Final Presentation from Project Group #7, SIMS 202, Fall 2004 Class, UC Berkley School of Information Management & Systems, located at <http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/academics/courses/is202/f04/phone—project/Group7/>, last visited on Feb. 2, 2010, thirteen pages. |
Manguy, L. et al. (2006). “iTour—Packing the World Into Your Mobile Device,” Final Presentation from Project Group #6, SIMS 202, Fall 2004 Class, UC Berkley School of Information Management & Systems, located at <http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/academics/courses/is202/f04/phone—project/Group6/index.h > . . . , last visited on Feb. 2, 2010, ten pages. |
Mitnick, S. et al. (2004). “Pillbox,” Final Presentation from Project Group #8, SIMS: 02: Fall 2004 Class, UC Berkley School of Information Management & Systems, located at <http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/academics/courses/is202/f04/phone—project/Group8/about.p . . . ,> last visited on Feb. 2, 2010, seventeen pages. |
Wooldridge, M. et al. (2005). “STALK. The Camera-phone Scavenger Hunt!” located at <http://www.stalk.com >, last visited on Dec. 28, 2009, two pages. |
www.stalk.com (retrieved on Dec. 29, 2009) pp. 1-2. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “CommunityWalk—About,” located at <http://www.communitywalk.com/about >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, one page. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “CommunityWalk Mapping Made Easy,” located at <http://www.communitywalk.com/>, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, one page. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “Google Earth User Guide” located at <http://earth.google.com/userguide/v4/>, last visited on Feb. 27, 2008, twelve pages. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “Google Earth—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia,” located at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—earth >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, fourteen pages. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “Google Earth User Guide—Using Image Overlays and 3D Models,” located at <http://earth.google.com/userguide/v4/ug—imageoverlays.html>, nine pages. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “Google Maps,” located at<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—maps >, last visited on Feb. 27, 2008, eleven pages. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “Live Search Maps,” located at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows—live—maps >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, six pages. |
Anonymous. (Date Unknown). “WikiMapia,” located at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiMapia >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, three pages. |
Anonymous. (2007) “Ask.com Maps & Directions,”located at <http://maps.ask.com/maps >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, one page. |
Anonymous. (2007). “Wayfaring Follow You, Follow Me,” located at <http://www.wayfaring.com/>, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, three pages. |
Anonymous. (2008). “Platial the People's Atlas,” located at <www.platial.com >, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, one page. |
Anonymous, (2008). “Wikimpaia.org ,” located at <http://wikimpaia.org/>, last visited on Mar. 3, 2008, one page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,259, filed Dec. 6, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,157, filed Dec. 17, 2007, Hayashi. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,875, filed Dec. 7, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/960,368, filed Dec. 19, 2007, Madsen. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,007, filed Dec. 6, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,454, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/953,494, filed Dec. 10, 2007, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,594, filed Mar. 31, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/236,668, filed Sep. 24, 2008, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/057,943, filed Mar. 28, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/057,878, filed Mar. 28, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,751, filed Jan. 4, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,249, filed Jun. 27, 2008, Kalaboukis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/145,145, filed Jun. 24, 2008, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,813, filed Jul. 30, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,969, filed Jun. 27, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,314, filed Jun. 27, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,969, filed Aug. 21, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/234,000, filed Sep. 19, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/241,590, filed Sep. 30, 2008, Athsani. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/241,687, filed Sep. 30, 2008, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,172, filed Sep. 8, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,291, filed Nov. 18, 2008, Nair. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,317, filed Nov. 18, 2008, Nair. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,345, filed Nov. 18, 2008, Nair. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/273,371, filed Nov. 18, 2008, Nair. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/241,198, filed Sep. 30, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/339,355, filed Dec. 19, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/329,038, filed Dec. 5, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/326,553, filed Dec. 12, 2008, Churchill. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,656, filed Sep. 30, 2008, Burgener. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,311, filed Jan. 21, 2009, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,332, filed Jan. 21, 2009, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,345, filed Jan. 21, 2009, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/357,285, filed Jan. 21, 2009, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,867, filed Mar. 24, 2009, King. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/540,098, filed Aug. 12, 2009, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/536,892, filed Aug. 6, 2009, King. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/540,588, filed Aug. 13, 2009, Tendjoukian. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,115, filed Jan. 16, 2006, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/180,486, filed Jul. 25, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/180,499, filed Jul. 25, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/015,146, filed Jan. 16, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,088, filed Mar. 3, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,062, filed Mar. 3, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,054, filed Mar. 3, 2008, Higgins. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/540,269, filed Aug. 12, 2009, Kalaboukis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,815, filed Jan. 4, 2004, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,111, filed Jul. 29, 2008, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/434,575, filed May 1, 2009, O'Sullivan. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/434,580, filed May 1, 2009, O'Sullivan. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,690, filed Mar. 19, 2009, Davis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,681, filed Mar. 19, 2009, Athsani. |
International Search Report (PCT/US2009/030405) dated Sep. 23, 2009; 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,054 file history dated Mar. 3, 2008; 64 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,062 file history dated Mar. 3, 2008; 66 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,088 file history dated Mar. 3, 2008; 66 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/169,931 file history dated Jul. 9, 2008; 66 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/170,025 file history dated Jul. 9, 2008; 67 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/180,499 file history dated Jul. 25, 2008; 67 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/180,486 file history dated Jul. 25, 2008; 65 pgs. |
International Search Report PCT/US2009/030406 dated Sep. 29, 2009; 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/US2009/034445 dated Oct. 12, 2009; 7 pages. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,054 dated Oct. 27, 2010; 15 pages. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,062 dated Oct. 28, 2010; 12 pages. |
International Search Report PCT/US2009/034444 dated Sep. 18, 2009; 2 pages. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/041,088 dated Oct. 4, 2010; 18 pages. |
Almieda, R.B. et al. “A Community-Aware Search Engine,” WWW2004, New York., NY, May 17-22, 2004, pp. 413-421. |
Anonymous. (Jul. 16, 2006). MyFantasyLeague Fantasy Football League Management—Features, located at <http://web.archive.org/web/20060716072900/www.myfantasyleague.com/features.htm>, last visited on Feb. 10, 2009, four pages. |
Anonymous. (Jul. 17, 2006). “Fantasy Football Lineup Analyzer—Tips for Who to Start & Who to Bench each Week,” located at http://web.archive.org/web/200607171633529/www.fantasyfootballstarters.com/lineupAnalyzer.jsp>, last visited on Feb. 10, 2009, one page. |
Bharat, K. (Date Unknown). “SearchPad: Explicit Capture of Search Context to Support Web Search, ” located at <http://www.9.org/w9cdrom/173/173.html >, last visited Aug. 1, 2007, 13 pages. |
Budzik, J. et al. (2000). “User Interactions with Everyday Applications as Context for Just-in-Time Information Access,” Proceeding of the 2000 Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, eight pages. |
Finkelstein, L. et al. (2001). “Placing Search in Context: The Concept Revisited,” WWW/O, Hong Kong, May 2-5, 2001, pp. 406-414. |
Freyne, J. et al. (2004). “Further Experiments on Collaborative Ranking in Community-Based Web Search,” Artificial Intelligence Review, pp. 1-23. |
Lieberman, H. (1995) “Letizia: An Agent that Assists Web Browsing,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Aug. 20-25, 1995, six pages. |
Mitra, M. et al. (1998). “Improving Automatic Query Expansion,” Proceedings of the AMC SIGIR, nine pages. |
Rhodes, B.J. et al. (1996). “Remembrance Agent: A Continuously Running Automated Information Retrieval System,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM), pp. 487-495, located at <http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/Thad.Starner/p/032—40—agents&ubicomp/remembrance-agent . . . >, last visited Aug. 1, 2007, six pages. |
Sansbury, C. (Sep. 13, 2005). “Yahoo! Widget for BBC Sports News—Scotland,” 32. located at <http://widgets.yahoo.com/gallery/view.php?widget=37220 >, last visited on Feb. 7, 2007, one page. |
Yahoo! Inc. (Dec. 7, 2005). “Yahoo! Widget Engine 3.0 Reference Manual Version 3.0,” 300 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,690, filed Mar. 19, 2009; 50 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,681, filed Mar. 19, 2009; 56 pages. |
International Search Report PCT/US2008/088228 dated Sep. 30, 2009—2 pages. |
Written Opinion PCT/US2008/088228 dated Sep. 30, 2009—5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,451, filed Dec. 28, 2006, Kalaboukis. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,973, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,974, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,976, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,979, filed Nov. 22, 2006, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/237,709, filed Sep. 25, 2008, Martinez. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/399,669, filed Mar. 6, 2009, King. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/353,657, filed Feb. 13, 2006, Mor Naaman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,344, filed May 19, 2006, Jaffe. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,869, filed Nov. 6, 2006, Mor Naaman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/593,668, filed Nov. 6, 2006, Mor Naaman. |
Allen James F., “Maintaining Knowledge About Temporal Intervals”, Communications of the ACM, Nov. 1983, vol. 26, No. 11 pp. 832-843; 12 pages. |
Press Release, “QUALCOMM Conducts First Live Demonstration of FL Technology on a Wireless Handset”, Qualcomm Inc., San Diego, Sep. 27, 2005; 3 pages. |
MediaFlo, FLO Technology Overview, Qualcomm Inc. Copyright 2007; 24 pages. |
Axup, Jeff et al., “Conceptualizing New Mobile Devices by Observing Gossip and Social Network Formation Amongst the Extremely Mobile”, ITEE Technical Report #459, Dec. 19, 2005, pp. 1-71. |
Conhaim, Wallys W., “Social networks: the Internet continues to evolve: where is the money in all this? That is what venture capitalists are asking. (Perspectives)”, Information Today, 22, 9, 35(2), Oct. 2005, (pp. 1-5 of attached). |
Davis, Marc et al., “From Context to Content: Leveraging Context to Infer Media Metadata”, ACM Press, Oct. 10, 2004, pp. 1-8. |
Kaasinen, E., “Behaviour & Information Technology”, Taylor & Francis, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2005, pp. 37-49, (Abstract only attached). |
Konomi, Shin'ichi et al., “Supporting Colocated Interactions Using RFID and Social Network Displays”, Pervasive Computing, Jul.-Sep. 2006 , vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 48-56 (pp. 1-4 of attached). |
Lin, F. et al., “A unified framework for managing Web-based services.”, Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 3, Oct. 2005, p. 299, (pp. 1-15 of attached). |
Metz, Cade, “MySpace Nation”, PC Magazine, Jun. 21, 2006, pp. 1-10 attached. |
Perkowitz, Mike et al., “Utilizing Online Communities to Facilitate Physical World Interactions”, The International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Sep. 19, 2003, Amsterdam, pp. 1 6. |
Roush, Wade, “Social Machines”, Continuous Computing Blog, Jul. 5, 2005, pp. 1-21. |
Roush, Wade, “Social Machines”, Technology Review, Aug. 2005, pp. 45-51. |
Sheppard, Brett, “The Rights Stuff: The Integration of Enterprise Digital Rights Management Into an Enterprise Architecture”, ECantent, vol. 29, No. 9, Nov. 2006, p. 38, 40-44, (pp. 1-7 of attached). |
Voight, Joan et al., “Lessons for Today's Digital Market”, ADWEEKCOM, Oct. 2, 2006, pp. 1-6. |
“Companies add new communication features to photo sharing.”, Digital Imaging Digest, Feb. 2006, pp. 1-2. |
“Dave.TV and Eye Music Network Empower Users to Create Their Own Music TV Channel on Their Sites With New IPTV Channel”, www.davenw.com/2006, Sep. 13, 2006, pp. 1-2. |
“Digital rights management: a primer: developing a user-friendly means of protecting content.(Profile)”, Screen Digest, No. 420, p. 305, Sep. 2006, (pp. 1-9 of attached). |
“Emerging Markets: What media 2.0 can offer advertisers.”, Campaign, Oct. 27, 2006, p. 26, (pp. 1-5 of attached). |
“Reality Digital Debuts Opus”, www.lightreading.com. Sep. 25, 2006, pp. 1. |
“Reality Digital—Making Media Move”, www.realitydigital.com, Nov. 28, 2006, pp. 1-2. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or Declaration (PCT/US2007/'084797) dated Mar. 21, 2008; 11 pages. |
International Search Report (PCT/US2007/084807) dated May 27, 2008; 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (PCT/US2007/084807) dated May 26, 2009; 5 pages. |
International Search Report (PCT/US2010/026063) dated May 27, 2008; 3 pages. |
Rekimoto, et al., “CyberCode: designing augmented reality environments with visual tags.” Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments, Elsinore, Denmark, pp. 1-11 Apr. 12-14, 2000. |
“Semacode—URL Barcodes—practical ubiquitous computing”, located at http://semacode.org visited on Apr. 13, 2007; 3 pages. |
“Technical White Paper: Choosing the best 2D barcode format for mobile apps,” Semacode, Jul. 15, 2006; pp. 1-7 located at http://semacode.org/about/technical/whitepaper/best213 d—code.pdf. |
Carbonell, J. et al. (Aug. 24-28, 1998). “The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries,” SIGIR '98: Proceedings of the 21 S Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval: Melbourne, Australia W.B. Croft et al. eds., pp. 335-336. |
Cooper, M. et al. (Nov. 2-8, 2003). “Temporal Event Clustering for Digital Photo Collections,” MM'03 Berkeley, California, pp. 364-373. |
Davis, M. et al. (Oct. 10-16, 2004). “From Context to Content: Leveraging Context to Infer Media Metadata,” MM'04 New York, New York. 9 pages. |
Davis, M. et al. “From Context to Content: Leveraging Context for Mobile Media Metadata.” 9 pages. |
Davis. M. et al. (Apr. 2-7, 2005). “MMM2: Mobile Media Metadata for Media Sharing,” CHI 2005 Portland, Oregon. 4 pages. |
Davis, M. et al. “Mobile Media Metadata for Mobile Imaging.” Jun. 27-30, 2004; 4 pages. |
Davis, M. et al. “Using Context and Similarity for Face and Location Identification.” 10 pages. |
Flickr. Welcome to Flickr—Photo Sharing, located at <http://www.flickr.com > visited on Feb. 26, 2007, one page. |
Gargi, U. (Aug. 7, 2003). “Consumer Media Capture: Time-Based Analysis and Event Clustering,” Technical Report HPL-2003-165 HP Laboratories Palo Alto, pp. 1-15. |
Goldberger, J. et al. The Hungarian Clustering Method, located at <http://scholar.googles.com/scholar?num=20&h1=en&lr=&9=cache:vbwslsm1CisJ:www.openu .acil/Personal—sites/tarnirtassa/Publications/hcm.pdf+goldberger+clustering+method+hungarian> visited on Mar. 1, 2007, twelve pages. |
Graham, A. et al. (Jul. 13-17, 2002). Time as Essence for Photo Browsing Through Personal Digital Libraries, JCDL '02 Portland, Oregon. 11 pages. |
Jaffe, A. et al. (May 23-26, 2006). “Generating Summaries for Large Collections of Geo-Referenced Photographs,” WWW 2006 Edinburgh, Scotland. 2 pages. |
Jaffe, A. et al. (Oct. 26-27, 2006). “Generating Summaries and Visualization for Large Collections of Geo-Referenced Photographs,” MIR '06 Santa Barbara, California. 11 pages. |
Joshi, D. et al. (Oct. 15-16, 2004). “The Story Picturing Engine: Finding Elite Images to Illustrate a Story Using Miitual Reinforcement,” MIR '04 New York, New York. 9 pages. |
Naaman, M. et al. (Nov. 2003). “From Where to What: Metadata Sharing for Digital Photographs with Geographic Coordinates,” In on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: Coop/S, DOA, and ODBASE R. Meersman et al. eds., pp. 196-217. |
Naaman, M. et al. (Jun. 7-11, 2004). “Automatic Organization for Digital Photographs with Geographic Coordinates” Proceedings of the Fourth ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries Global Reach and Diverse Impact: Tucson, Arizona, pp. 53-62. |
Nair, R. et al. (Nov. 6-11, 2005). “Photo L01: Browsing Multi-User Photo Collections,” MM'05 Singapore, pp. 223-224. |
O'Hare, N. et al. “Combination of Content Analysis and Context Features for Digital Photograph Retrieval.” 7 pages. |
Pigeau, A. et al. (Jun. 17, 2005). “Organizing a Personal Image Collection with Statistical Model-Based ICL Clustering on Spatio-Temporal Camera Phone Meta-Data.” 25 pages. |
Sarvas, R. et al. (Jun. 6-9, 2004). “Metadata Creation System for Mobile Images,” MobiSys'04 Boiton, Massachusetts, pp. 36-48. |
Toyama, K. et al. (Nov. 2-8, 2003). “Geographic Location Tags on Digital Images,” MM '03 Berkeley: California. 12 pages. |
Nedos, A; Singh K., Clarke S, Proximity Based Group Communications for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks'; Proximity-Based Group Communication; Global Smart Spaces; D.14; Oct. 3, 2003; 31 pages. |
Brunato, M; Battiti R. “Pilgrim: A Location Broker and Mobility-Aware Recommendation System”; Technical report DIT-02-0092, Universita di Trento, Oct. 2002; 8 pages. |
Backstrom et al., Spatial Variation in Search Engine Queries, WWW•2008, Beijing, China (Apr. 21-25, 2008). |
Gan et al., Analysis of Geographic Queries in a Search Engine Log, LocWeb 2008, Beijing, China (Apr. 22, 2008). |
Jones et al., Geographic Intention and Modification in Web Search, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1-20 (Jul. 2008). |
Sanderson et al., Analyzing Geographic Queries; Department of Information Studies; University of Sheffield, UK; 2 pages. |
Go With the Flow, The Economist Technology Quarterly, vol. 382, Issue 8519, 4 pages, (Mar. 10, 2007). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (PCT/US2009/060476) dated May 4, 2010; 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (PCT/US2009/060374) dated Apr. 30, 2010; 12 pages. |
International Search Report (PCT/US2009/060379) dated Apr. 30, 2010; 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (PCT/US2008/085135) dated May 25, 2009; 7 pages. |
International Search Report (PCT/US2009/055503) dated Apr. 8, 2010; 3 pages. |
Written Opinion (PCT/US2008/085915) dated Jun. 29, 2009; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion (PCT/US2008/086948) dated May 21, 2009; 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (PCT/US2009/051247) dated Jan. 25, 2010; 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (PCT/US2009/046258) dated Dec. 23, 2009; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090328087 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |