Patent Application
20160072694
The present disclosure relates to loopback and network loop detection in a network.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method of determining the presence of a loopback in one or more networks comprises storing information related to a test instance; sending a loopback detection beacon (LPDB) containing information related to the test instance from a port on an originating device; monitoring the port for a predetermined time period to detect LPDBs arriving at the port during the predetermined time period; and determining whether a detected LPDB contains information corresponding to the stored information, to detect the presence of a loopback. The method may determine whether a detected loopback is a port loopback, a tunnel loopback or a service loopback. The information related to the test instance in the LPDB may be in a protocol data unit (PDU). The stored information related to the test instance may be deleted if an LPDB arriving at the port and containing information corresponding to the stored information is not detected within the predetermined time period.
In one implementation, the LPDB includes a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) signature, and a detected loopback is determined to be a tunnel loopback if an LPDB arriving at the port includes a VLAN signature that matches a VLAN signature in an LPDB sent from the port. The method may determine whether a detected port loopback is a hard cable loopback or a facility loopback. The information in the LPDB may contain a time stamp, so that the difference between the time stamp and the arrival time of a detected LPDB can be used to determine whether a detected loopback is a hard cable loopback or a remote facility loopback. The detected loopback can be determined to be a hard cable loopback if the difference is smaller than a predetermined threshold, and determined to be a facility loopback if the difference is greater than the predetermined threshold.
In another implementation, the LPDB includes a Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) signature that includes a Customer Service Specification (CSS) and a Network Service Specification (NSS), and a detected loopback is determined to be a service loopback if (1) the CSS of an LPDB.arriving at the port matches the CSS of an LPDB sent from the port, or (2) the NSS of an LPDB.arriving at the port matches the NSS of an LPDB sent from the port.
The monitoring and determining may be implemented on the originating device, or on a device or server separate from the originating device. Affected traffic may be discarded in response to the detection of a loopback. Future traffic may be blocked at the port in response to the detection of a loopback, and the blocking may be revertive or non-revertive. The LPDB may be restricted to one or more selected sections of the one or more networks. The LPDB may be generated using a software tool, and the software tool may be used to detect loopback based on the LPDB and/or to configure am NLDB.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method of determining the presence of a network loop comprises storing information related to a test instance; setting a time period related to the test instance; sending a network loop detection beacon (NLDB) containing information related to the test instance from a port on an originating device; monitoring the port for a predetermined time period to detect an NLDB arriving at the port during the predetermined time period; and determining whether a detected NLDB contains information corresponding to the stored information, to detect the presence of a network loop. In one implementation, the information related to the test instance includes a Customer Service Specification (CSS) and a Network Service Specification (NSS), and the method determines whether a detected NLDB is a network loop if the CSS and NSS of an NLDB arriving at the port match the CSS and NSS of an NLDB sent from the port. The originating device may be a network device. The NLDB may arrive at a second port on the originating device, and be forwarded to the port from which the NLDB was sent. An alarm may be reported if a network loop is detected. The NLDB may be generated or configured using a software tool, which may be used to detect the network loop.
In one implementation, traffic is either discarded or blocked if a network loop is detected. The blocking may be revertive or non-revertive.
The foregoing and other advantages of the disclosure will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments or implementations have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of an invention as defined by the appended claims.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments or implementations have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of an invention as defined by the appended claims.
A loopback occurs when a frame, such as an Ethernet frame, returns to the same port of the Network Device (ND) that it departed from. A ND can be a Network Interface Device (NID) or any switching or routing device with internal connectivity. The port can be a user network interface (UNI), External Network to Network Interface (ENNI) or an Internal Network to Network Interface (INNI). A network loop occurs when a frame returns to the same port of the ND that it departed from, via a different port and after being forwarded within the ND to the port that it departed from.
Examples of a loopback and a network loop are shown in
Different types of loopback are possible. These include, for example, port loopback, tunnel loopback or service loopback.
A port loopback, occurs if the frame returns to the same port as shown in, for example,
Another type of port loopback is logical loopback, as shown in
Port loopback can arise because a hard loopback is set up directly to a port, otherwise known as hard cable loopback; or a facility loopback is set up either physically or logically.
Network loops occur when a physical loop is created in a network due to misconnection of cables or misconfiguration of switches.
Loopbacks and network loops may cause a number of issues in a network including loss of intended connectivity, interference with MAC address learning at switches, slowed traffic in the network because looped frames are broadcast back into the network thus increasing traffic and slowing down the network, and broadcast storms.
Therefore, there is a need for detection of loopbacks and network loops in a network, in order to locate the fault and remedy the problem in a timely manner without excessive disruption of the transmission of data in the network.
In one embodiment, a loopback detection beacon (LPDB) is used to detect loopbacks. The LPDB may be a data frame with specific protocol data unit (PDU) information that is used to identify the LPDB.
An exemplary embodiment to detect port loopback is shown in
In one embodiment, an LPDB is used to detect port loopback. This is shown in
In a further embodiment, a timestamp associated with the LPDB is used to distinguish between hard cable loopback and remote facility loopback. If the LPDB returns, the timestamp is compared to the time. If the difference is smaller than a threshold (typically one transmission delay), then a hard cable loopback is detected, otherwise if the difference is larger, a remote facility loopback is detected.
In another embodiment, the LPDB is used to detect tunnel loopback. An exemplary LPDB 811 to detect a tunnel loopback is shown in
In another embodiment, the LPDB is used to detect service loopback. The LPDB includes information that uniquely identifies the customer network and is sent from a UNI in either an upstream direction or a downstream direction. An example LPDB 911 to detect service loopback is shown in
Upstream service loopback is detected if the CSS of the originating frame matches the CSS of the returning frame.
Similarly, downstream service loopback is detected if the CSS and NSS of the originating frame matches the CSS and NSS of the returning frame when the LPDB is sent downstream from port 201-1 and returns to port 201-1. In this case, the rules may be sent to port 201-2 in case the LPDB returns to that port which would indicate a misconfiguration and can raise an alarm.
In one embodiment, the monitoring processes to detect loopbacks as described above are implemented on the ND. In another embodiment, these monitoring processes are implemented on a separate device or server. In this case, the information about the test instance is stored on the separate device, and if an LPDB is received, its information or the LPDB itself is forwarded to the separate device for processing. Information about several received LPDB can be aggregated into one message between the ND and the separate device.
In one embodiment, the LPDB is generated by a customer using a software tool. In an additional embodiment, the tool is used to detect loopbacks and network loops; and determine the location of the loopbacks or network loops. The software tool includes a programmable interface that allows the user to configure the LPDB to their particular requirements, before the LPDB is generated. In one embodiment, this software tool is run on the ND. In a further embodiment, this software tool is run on a separate server or device.
In an embodiment, the LPDB is configured before generation depending on the network to be tested or the detection needs, that is, whether it is being used to detect a port, tunnel or service loopback or the filters and modifiers present in the rule information already in the configuration describing the forwarding path used for forwarding within the ND.
If a loopback is detected, then in one embodiment, affected traffic is discarded. In a further embodiment, future traffic is blocked at the port, by blocking the forwarding capabilities to and from the port. For the cases of port loopback, tunnel loopback and downstream service loopback, forwarding of traffic to the port is prevented. For the case of upstream service loopback, forwarding of traffic from the port is prevented. In one embodiment, this blocking is revertive. This means that after the loopback is removed, the blocking is removed automatically. In another embodiment, this blocking is non-revertive, that is, the operator has to remove the blocking manually.
In one embodiment, a network loop is detected using a network loop detection beacon (NLDB).
An exemplary NLDB 1311 is shown in
In one embodiment, an NLDB is sent from a port of an originating device, such as an ND, into the network.
In one embodiment, the monitoring processes to detect network loops, as described above, are implemented on the ND. In another embodiment, these monitoring process are implemented on a separate device or server.
In one embodiment, the NLDB is generated by a customer using a software tool. The tool may be used to detect loopbacks and network loops, and to determine the location of the loopbacks or network loops. The software includes a programmable interface that allows the user to configure the NLDB to the user's particular requirements, before the NLDB is generated. The software tool may be run on the ND, or on a separate server or device.
The NLDB may be configured before generation based on the filters and modifiers present in the rule information used for forwarding within the ND.
If a network loop is detected on a port, traffic from that port may be discarded. Alternatively, traffic may be blocked from entering the port. This blocking may be revertive (which means that after the cause of the loopback is removed, the blocking is removed automatically), or non-revertive (which means the blocking has to be removed manually).
Alarms may be reported if a loopback or network loop is detected. If traffic is discarded, due to either loopbacks such as port or tunnel loopbacks being detected or a network loop being detected, then a critical alarm is reported.
The methods for testing for loopbacks can be generalized to a multiple-section network scenario, where different sections of the network are assigned different levels, and domains are created based on the levels. In one embodiment, each domain has a number, and the domain includes one or more sections either at the same level as the domain number or the levels below. For example, a domain number 2 includes all level 2 sections and level 1 sections. A domain number 4 includes all level 4, level 3, level 2 and level 1 sections.
An exemplary multiple-section network 1200, with NDs 1211-1216 between each section, is shown in
The domain that each section belongs to is as shown in Table 2
In one embodiment, domain numbers are assigned to LPDBs as part of the LPDB configuration process. Based on the assigned domain numbers, LPDBs are restricted to one or more selected sections to test for loops within those sections. The restriction is specified within a forwarding rule at each ND at the interface to the next section. For example, with reference to the example above, an LPDB with a domain number 4 can only traverse sections 1203, 1204 and 1205, and is prevented, by a forwarding rule implemented within the NDs at the interfaces to section 1202 and 1206, from entering sections 1202 and 1206, which are level 5.
In a further embodiment, an equal flag is added to the LPDB domain number as part of the domain number assigning process, so that LPDBs are not forwarded outside sections with levels which do not have the same domain number. Referring to the example above, an LPDB with an equal flag and domain number 4 remains in either section 1203 or 1205, and cannot enter section 1202, 1204 or 1206.
It should be understood that any two or more of the algorithms disclosed herein can be combined in any combination. Any of the methods, algorithms, implementations, or procedures described herein can include machine-readable instructions for execution by: (a) a processor, (b) a controller, and/or (c) any other suitable processing device. Any algorithm, software, or method disclosed herein can be embodied in software stored on a non-transitory tangible medium such as, for example, a flash memory, a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive, a digital versatile disk (DVD), or other memory devices, but persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the entire algorithm and/or parts thereof could alternatively be executed by a device other than a controller and/or embodied in firmware or dedicated hardware in a well known manner (e.g., it may be implemented by an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device (PLD), a field programmable logic device (FPLD), discrete logic, etc.). Also, some or all of the machine-readable instructions represented herein can be implemented manually as opposed to automatically by a controller, processor, or similar computing device or machine. Further, although specific algorithms are described with reference to flowcharts depicted herein, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many other methods of implementing the example machine readable instructions may alternatively be used. For example, the order of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or some of the blocks described may be changed, eliminated, or combined.
It should be noted that the algorithms illustrated and discussed herein as having various modules which perform particular functions and interact with one another. It should be understood that these modules are merely segregated based on their function for the sake of description and represent computer hardware and/or executable software code which is stored on a computer-readable medium for execution on appropriate computing hardware. The various functions of the different modules and units can be combined or segregated as hardware and/or software stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium as above as modules in any manner, and can be used separately or in combination.
While particular implementations and applications of the present disclosure have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations can be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of an invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/095,273, filed on Dec. 22, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/045,965, filed on Sep. 4, 2014, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62095273 | Dec 2014 | US | |
| 62045965 | Sep 2014 | US |
