Patent Grant
7669653
The present invention generally relates to systems and methods for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore. More specifically, the invention pertains to such systems and methods capable of providing a seal being part of the permanent wellbore installation.
In general, oil, gas, water, geothermal or analogous wells, which are more than a few hundreds of meters deep, contain a steel lining called the casing. The annular space between the underground formation and the casing is cemented over all or a large portion of its depth. The essential function of the cement sheath is to prevent fluid migration along the annulus and between the different formation layers through which the borehole passes and to control the ingress of fluid into the well.
However, this zonal isolation may be lost for a number of reasons. Mud may remain at the interface between the cement and the casing and/or the formation. This forms a path of least resistance for gas or other fluids movement. Changes in downhole conditions may induce stresses that compromise the integrity of the cement sheath. Tectonic stresses and large increases in wellbore pressure or temperature may crack the sheath and may even reduce it to rubble. Radial displacement of casing, caused by cement bulk shrinkage or temperature decreases, as well as decreases in fluid weight during drilling and completion, may cause the cement to debond from the casing and create a microannulus. Routine well-completion operations, including perforating and hydraulic fracturing, negatively impact the cement sheath.
Various methods are used to attempt to prevent a film of mud forming on the casing/formation surface. The most common methods involve use of spacers and wash fluids to remove as much as possible of the remaining mud and the mud filter cake from the walls of the wellbore. This process has been the subject of continuous modification and improvement over the past several decades, but success has been limited by the operational conditions and the limited amount of time and resources that can be put into these operations. As a result, the efficiency of mud removal is often less than desired.
On the other side, mechanical properties of cement, such as elasticity, expandability, compressive strength, durability and impact resistance have been improved, in particular, by the addition of fibres and/or plastic or metallic particles. Increased flexibility helps the cement respond to thermal, mechanical or pressure shocks and can minimize debonding of the cement from the metal casing or from the formation wall. Fibres are best at handling mechanical shocks, such as those encountered when one needs to drill through an existing cement sheath in order to form a lateral arm of the well. This is an important part of the construction of multilateral wellbores. Expandability ensures that the cement is held in compression behind casing thus allowing for pressure drops in the annulus without debonding between the casing and the isolating material. In this case, the expansion needs to be tailored to the mechanical properties of the formation and to the cement in order to be effective. These properties are not always known in sufficient detail to achieve optimal performance.
Also, various methods have been proposed to improve the sealing of the formations, including the use of cement with additives such as silicone as described in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,196,316 or epoxy resin (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,350,309). In U.S. Pat. No. 5,992,522 the hydrostatic pressure of a column of bitumen is used to prevent vertical migration of fluids in a wellbore.
Other completion techniques are so-called “open hole” completions as often encountered in laterally extended wells. In open hole completion, the casing or production tubing is not cemented and zonal isolation when required is achieved by using packers. Packers are constituted by annular sealing rings comprising a double elastomer wall reinforced with a metal braid. The double wall delimits a chamber, which is usually inflated by cement or other suitable compositions such as expanding resin (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,109). Packers suffer from limitations and drawbacks, which are outlined, for example, in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,232 and are often not suitable for permanent wellbore installations.
Thus, there is a need for methods and systems that can be placed at key positions to provide zonal isolation or plugging in the wellbore. Further, there is a need for a single approach that can be used in a majority of completions. There is a need for a process that can be executed efficiently and reliably in the oilfield. There is further a need for a solution that, while generically useful, can readily be tailored to survive different down-hole environments such as maximum temperature and fluid exposure for an extended period of time, and ideally over the lifetime of the well. These fluids could be brines, hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and may further include aggressive treatment fluids such as hydrochloric acid.
Considering the above, it is one aspect of the invention to provide an improved system and method for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore.
According to a first aspect of the invention, a system for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore, characterized in that said system comprises, at a specific location along said wellbore, a sealing element, said sealing element being able to deform both during and after placement.
In a second aspect, the invention concerns a method of maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: placing a sealing element at a specific location along said wellbore; allowing said sealing element to be able to deform both during and after placement and maintaining the sealing element in compression.
Important properties for ensuring a good seal according to this invention are that the material remains in compression after setting, and that its Young's modulus is sufficiently lower than that of the rock or cement such that the latter can effectively confine it, so that any radial stress developed in the sealing element is insufficient to cause significant movement of the surrounding rock. Therefore, the sealing material modulus is preferably an order of magnitude lower than the rock at 1-100 MPa. In principle there is no lower limit to the modulus, but materials below 1 MPa are more likely to be able to undergo viscoelastic flow and thus be able to relax their compressive stress by extrusion into cracks in the surrounding rock or cement or gaps at the interfaces between rock or casing and cement.
Thus, the sealing element is able to accommodate any likely conformational, pressure or temperature changes of the surrounding wellbore portion by contracting or expanding in response to said changes. As a result, if, after placement, a pathway constituted, in particular, by cement fractures or micro-annuli formed either, at the cement/casing interface or at the cement/formation interface, is created, then, said sealing element deforms and blocks said pathway hence preventing any fluid migration along the wellbore.
The state of compression can be maintained by using a connection element that provides a connection from the sealing element to a pressure reservoir, most preferably located at the surface.
Alternatively the sealing element is placed and sets in a state of compression in a volume limited by materials of high Young's modulus. This volume is in most application formed by the steel casing or tubing in the wellbore, the rock face and cement layers above and below the sealing element. The respective Young moduli of those boundary materials are all above 1000 MPa, hence, an order of magnitude higher than the sealing material, itself.
The sealing element is preferably a chemical compound that homogeneously fills the volume defined above.
A broad variety of chemical compositions and placement methods can be applied to achieve a zonal isolation in accordance with the invention.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of non-limitative modes for carrying out the invention and drawings.
According to the invention, the sealing material, which forms the sealing element, may be in a solid state or in a liquid state. If the sealing material is in a liquid state, it may be a yield stress fluid.
Sealing materials in a solid state will approximate the behaviour of an elastic solid. There are four parameters that may be used to describe the deformability of an elastic solid: the Young's modulus (E), the shear modulus (G), the bulk modulus (K) and the Poisson's ratio (v). These parameters are inter-related and satisfy to the following equations: K=E/3(1−2v) and G=E/2(1+v). The Young's modulus of the sealing material according to the invention, as well as the shear modulus of said material are, respectively, lower than the Young's modulus of typical cements that are used for downhole applications and than the shear modulus of said typical cements. In other words, the sealing material is more deformable than these typical cements. Advantageously, it is even more deformable than the most deformable cement produced by Schlumberger™ under the trademarked name FlexSTONE. In particular, the sealing material of the invention has preferably a Young's modulus below 1000 MPa, more preferably between 1 and 100 Mpa, whereas typical cements have a Young's modulus comprised between 5000 and 8000 MPa and FlexSTONE has a Young's modulus around 1000 MPa.
If the sealing material is in a liquid state, its Young's modulus and its shear modulus tend to become 0. Then, the sealing material of the invention tends to be infinitely deformable. If the sealing material is a yield stress fluid, then it is a gel or soft solid, which behaves like a solid below the yield stress and behaves like a liquid above said yield stress. This yield stress fluid may be visco-plastic or visco-elastic. Preferably, its yield stress value is high, greater than 10 Pa and, advantageously, greater than 600 Pa.
Where the sealing material is a yield stress fluid, the sealing material is advantageously a composite, which comprises a fluid continuous phase and solid particulate material or fibres. In a particular mode for carrying out the invention, the cement sheath and the sealing element form an intermingled, random composite material, wherein the sealing element/material forms a continuous path between the formation and the casing or across the casing or right across the wellbore diameter in the case of plug and abandonment or completes a continuous path within a discontinuous cement sheath, at a specific location along the wellbore.
When the sealing element is made of a solid material, then this solid material, which is elastic, is maintained, or held permanently, under compression. Practically, the sealing element may be pre-compressed, held under compression hydraulically (e.g. using an inflation tube) or held under compression using mechanical means. For example, the sealing element may be held in compression by external means such as surrounding cement portions.
The requirement that the sealing element be kept in a state of compression is principally to prevent the formation of a microannulus between the sealing element and the casing. However, it is also beneficial in preventing any radial cracking of the material which might result from expansion of the well placing the material in a state of tangential tension, because the compressive stress first has to be reversed before tension can occur. A low modulus greatly reduces the likelihood of tension occurring, because it increases the strain required to achieve it. Because the steel casing is by far the strongest component in the wellbore, increases in wellbore pressure are not transmitted directly to the annular sealant as corresponding stresses, but rather as small strains resulting from the expansion of the casing. With a low modulus material, the stress resulting from such a strain is correspondingly lower than with a high modulus material. Furthermore, if the material has a high Poisson's ratio then the stress will be more uniformly distributed across the annulus. This is in contrast to the typical case for a cement, for which the low Poisson's ratio means that the cement may be simultaneously in tangential tension at the casing interface and in tangential compression at the wellbore wall even if the rock is strong enough to confine it effectively.
According to a further example, a compressed ring in a groove on a casing may be kept in place by a plastic or metal sleeve, which melts or dissolves or slides once the casing is in place to release the sealing ring and to press against formation, still under compression. Also, a rubber cylinder may be placed on the outside of the casing, across the casing junction, with steel rim at both ends. When the casing is in place, the casing sections are twisted together on their thread, or pushed further together, to buckle the rubber cylinder out into a compressed seal that fills the annulus. Similarly, the rubber cylinder may cover a bellows section of casing, kept open by struts, which are removable once casing is in right position. The weight of the upper casing then compresses the bellows and the rubber cylinder buckles out to form the seal.
If the sealing element is to be placed in fluid form, the sealing material is required to be sufficiently fluid prior to setting to be pumped, injected or placed at a specific downhole location. It may be a liquid or a gel placed in the annulus or on the outside of the casing, which is subsequently activated to transform to a visco-elastic solid or visco-plastic liquid seal by expansion of parts of the casing crushing encapsulated setting component of said sealing material, by an external trigger, for example, thermal or ultrasonic, said external trigger being placed at the required position in the annulus or the casing, or by injection of an activator into the annulus or through the casing.
If the sealing element does not set to form a solid material, that is to say, when said sealing element comprises either a liquid or a yield stress fluid, then it is not necessarily maintained under compression by such external means. Compression may result from the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid/yield fluid column that forms the sealing material. The sealing element would be however supported by external means, for example, by a cement portion of the cement sheath. In some particular modes for carrying out the invention, the sealing element is kept in compression through a supply line. This supply line may also be used to monitor the pressure in the sealing element from a surface site.
Another option according to the invention relates to the conversion of mud and/or filter cake in place after drilling into a sealing element elastic solid or suitable visco-plastic liquid/solid by an expandable element of the well tube activating the release of additional setting components. The conversion can be achieved by, for example, injecting, at the required position into the annulus or through a valve in the casing, additional setting components, or by using external triggers for the release or the activation of setting components applied at the required position by direct insertion into the annulus or within/through the casing.
Advantageously, the sealing material does not suffer from shrinkage upon setting, which is a condition for isotropic compressive stress, and it is able to maintain its hydrostatic load after setting. It is impermeable to the fluids that may migrate along the wellbore. Also, it is durable and its density may be adjusted.
In a conventional placement procedure, a material such as cement is pumped into the wellbore in a fluid state. It is then allowed sufficient time to cure to a solid state which is not able to deform. Placement, according the invention, has to be understood in a large sense as comprising all the steps from the initial pumping to the point where the final material properties of the sealing material have been attained.
According to the invention, the sealing element is deformable for an extended period of time after placement, throughout the production phase of the well or after said production phase. Ideally, when said sealing element is placed during the life of the well, its deformability properties should last for said life and survive appropriate maintenance or remedial operations. This includes surviving pressure and temperature shocks associated with routine well operations such as perforating, well testing, hydraulic fracturing or acid fracturing. This also includes, for example, shocks due to shutting in and re-initialising hydrocarbon production. Practically, the sealing element is designed to remain deformable for at least 5 years after placement in the wellbore. Preferably, it is designed to remain deformable for at least 30 years. When the sealing element is placed as a plug for well abandonment then the above 5- and 30-year durations apply.
According to the invention, the sealing element is placed at a specific location along the wellbore. When the formation comprises at least a first layer and a second layer, said first layer being essentially impermeable and said second layer being permeable, then the sealing element is placed, at least partially, adjacent to the first layer. Generally, this first layer is located above the second layer and forms a caprock for the permeable layer. Practically, said caprocks are formed by shale, limestone, granite or other impermeable rocks. In fact, a function of the sealing element is to restore the zonal isolation of fluids in the formation to the same condition as before the reservoir's natural seals were broken by the drilling of the well.
The sealing element presents restrictive dimensions as compared to the dimensions of the wellbore. Practically, each sealing element presents an average height, measured along the wellbore axis, is less than approximately 150 m and, preferably, less than approximately 60 m. More preferably, its average height is comprised between approximately 1 m and approximately 30 m. However, to counter the effects of fluid mixing, e.g. at the interface between cement and sealant, it may be advantageous to maintain a minimum length or height of 30 to 60 meters.
According to the invention, the sealing element may be placed at a specific location in the wellbore during the well construction phase or later, during the well production phase or along with the final plug and abandon process.
For example, the sealing element may be placed during drilling, in the case of a casing drilling. In another example, the sealing element is placed on the casing before said casing is lowered into the borehole. In such case, the sealing element may be pre-coated or pre-placed on the outer surface of the casing. In some cases, the sealing material may reinforce an inflatable mechanical seal. Then, it is placed either between the mechanical seal and the formation or casing, or above and below said mechanical seal. In case of plugging or abandonment operations, the sealing element may have an essentially full cylindrical or disk shape to seal the full cross-section of the well.
When the sealing element is placed in the annulus formed by outside wall of casing or production pipes within the borehole and its wall, it forms a ring. Elasticity and compression ensure that inner face of the ring maintains an intimate fluid-tight contact with the wall of the borehole pipes while the outside of the ring seals the wall of the borehole.
The sealing element may also be entirely contained in the casing or, where under-reaming is carried out, across both the casing and the annulus. In fact, where a shale seal has softened in drilling, an under-reaming is carried out and the sealing material is placed in the under-reamed section of the well.
Advantageously, the sealing elements are placed using methods known in principle from the placement of external casing packers (ECP) or coiled tubing. Alternatively, the elements may be placed as fluids using a pumping step from the surface or by making use of well intervention or remedial operations.
There are various possible implementations of the system and method of the invention, which are described in the following, by comparison with the prior art.
In
In an open hole completion, as illustrated in
A schematic drawing of a mode for carrying out a system for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore in accordance with an example of the present invention is illustrated in
A special case of
It will be appreciated that, by applying the novel method and system of the invention, the use and importance of the supporting matrix to provide zonal isolation is greatly reduced. Though cement may remain a suitable material for the supporting matrix, its properties and placement can be optimised to enhance its supporting function at the expense of its isolating properties. In fact, the main contribution to the zonal isolation is provided by the sealing rings 33. These sealing rings are made of a material able to deform for an extended period of time after placement. This material may be in a fluid or in a solid state. If it is in a solid state, it is held under compression to prevent the flow of fluids, i.e., liquids and/or gases, through the annulus between casing and formation.
Referring now to
As the sealing material is a compressible material, it can be set into a state of compression by the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column above. Even if the fluid column sets first, provided that it does not move and thus, the volume occupied by the sealing material remains constant, said sealing material remains under compression. Also, the compression may be established by placing expanding cement above and below the sealing ring. In yet another alternative, the casing 42 may be expanded in the vicinity of the sealing ring 43. Following both methods, the volume available to the elastic sealing element is reduced, leaving it in a compressed state so that it is able to deform to meet the conformational changes of the wellbore at its periphery.
In a variant shown in
The sensor line or similar fluid lines along the casing can serve as a fluid connection to continuously or in intervals pressurize the sealing ring and thus maintain it in compression.
The establishment of the compressed seal can involve a two-stage placement. For example solids-laden resin may be placed behind the casing in plug flow and the activator either encapsulated or injected in through a casing perforation under pressure. Examples of such chemistries would be based on (depending on temperature requirements) epoxy, phenolic, furan resins or styrene-butadiene block copolymer gel/resins.
In accordance with another alternative, as is illustrated by
Positioning of the inflatable sealing element defines where the sealant will be placed in the wellbore. Depending on whether the sealing material is setting or not, it may not be required that the inflatable element remains intact during the process. It could be, or act like, a burst disk that is destroyed above a certain pressure allowing access of the sealant to the annulus between the casing and the formation.
As above, a positive pressure on the sealing element or sealing element zone can be maintained by a constant or intermittent supply of fluid. This fluid supply line could contain a sensor to register the pressure change in the sealing element and allow an increased supply of material should the annular gap increase.
Alternatively, the sealing element may comprise an inflatable or swellable elements placed in the annulus, independently of the casing, using for example reverse circulation. This element is inflated or swells and, thus, seals off the formation at a right position in said annulus.
In the following, further sealing elements comprising a yield stress fluid are described. The composition of the yield fluid and other components of the sealing element may vary widely depending on the conditions encountered in the wellbore. To be effective in this application, the yield stress fluid constitutes advantageously an essentially continuous phase in the specific sealant area between the casing/tubing and the formation. The term “continuous phase” implies that the fluid phase has relatively high mobility within the sealant composite. This mobility is important at the specific areas where the seal is required. Thus, fluid phase continuity and its sealing effect is conserved upon dimensional changes in the wellbore. For example, conditions and events that would lead to formation of a microannulus in a conventional cemented wellbore, e.g., between the casing and the cement, equally creates pathways for liquid mobility to allow the fluid to seal the crack.
The fluid continuous phase needs to be present to the extent that a sufficient quantity of yield stress fluid can respond to dimensional changes in the wellbore and move to seal or maintain the seal in said wellbore. The yield stress fluid is stable under the downhole pressure and temperature conditions. It is environmentally acceptable for use in the oilfield as required by local regulations. It is preferred that the yield stress fluid is compatible with cement. Also, the yield stress fluid should not be converted to an elastic solid. It is not required that the fluid continuous phase material be a liquid at surface conditions. For instance, the sealing material could be added as a solid at the surface, either because it is a material that melts to form a yield stress fluid under downhole conditions, because the material has been encapsulated in order to facilitate adding and mixing, or because the final fluid will be formed by some downhole reaction such as hydrolysis or oxidation.
Examples of useable fluids include, but are not limited to: fluorocarbon oils or greases such as those available from DuPont under the Krytox trademark (examples may include Krytox GPL 225 for temperatures below about 200° C. and Krytox 283AC or Krytox XHT for higher temperatures), silicone oils such as those available from Dow or Rhodia, environmentally-friendly glycol ether-based oils available from Whitaker Oil.
The fluid can contain a number of different additives or non-continuous components. The term non-continuous in this case is used to differentiate a high volume component from the fluid continuous phase. The “non-continuous phase” may, in fact, be continuous, for example, systems comprised of two mutually continuous phases.
The component present in high volumes in the system may provide structural support, may protect the metal casing or tubing from corrosion, or may be inert. Examples include cement (class G, micro cements, flexible cements, expanding cements, tough cements, low density cement, high density cement), sized sand or ceramic proppant, inert solid polymer particles, and the like. From these materials, cement is preferred.
Furthermore, the fluid phase may contain a micron to sub-micron sized particulate material that can help clog micropores or other flow paths with a small diameter. Such particulate material can also be used to modify the rheological properties of the yield stress fluid phase for example by increasing the apparent viscosity, increasing the flow resistance, and/or increasing the maximum temperature stability. The particles may also tend to migrate to the formation or metal surface to improve the seal. Examples of particulate material include molybdenum disulfide (available from T.S. Moly-Lubricants, Inc), graphite (available from Poco Graphite), nano-sized clay particles (available from Nanocor, Inc).
In addition, the fluid phase may contain particulate material that is physically or chemically reactive to low molecular weight hydrocarbons or carbon dioxide. Preferentially, the materials would absorb low molecular weight hydrocarbons or carbon dioxide and increase in volume to fill any adjacent void volume. Examples include swellable rubbers. These materials are typically not fully vulcanised and can swell up to about 40% of their initial volume on exposure to low molecular weight hydrocarbons.
The fluid phase may also contain fibres. Such fibres can modify the apparent rheology of the fluid phase. This may help maintain the continuity of the seal fluid in cases where the sealant is placed as part of a sequence of fluids.
This may also help ensure coverage from the casing/tubing to the formation or facilitate the suspension of other solids. The fibres could be impregnated with other materials, such as biocides. An example of this is Fibermesh fibres impregnated with Microban B available from Synthetic Industries.
The fibres will have an aspect ratio (length over diameter) greater than 20, and preferably greater than 100. While there is no inherent limitation on fibre length, lengths between ⅛ inch and about 1.25 inches are preferred. Lengths between ⅛ and about 0.5 inches are especially preferred. The fibres should be stable at least during the placement/pumping period, but preferably for more than 1 week under the downhole conditions. Fibre diameter in the range of from about 6 to about 200 microns is preferred. The fibres may be fibrillated. They may range in geometry from spherical to oval to multilobe to rectangular. The surface may be rough or smooth. They may be formed of glass, carbon (including but not limited to graphite), ceramic (including but not limited to high zirconium content ceramics stable at elevated pH, natural or synthetic polymers or metals. Glass and synthetic polymer fibres are especially preferred due to their low cost and relative chemical stability.
Optionally, the fluid phase will contain expanding agents. These materials can help maintain the composite under compressions. They can also help the composite to expand to fill any adjacent void volume.
A number of other additives can also be used, as known by those experienced in the art. These materials may increase fluid viscosity, improve oxidative stability over time, improve thermal stability, increase or decrease density, decrease friction pressure during flow through pipes, and the like.
The gel could be a variation of InstanSEAL (™) technology as marketed by Schlumberger comprising a mixture of water, Xanthan gum and an oil containing amounts of clay and cross-linker.
Another manifestation uses drilling fluid solidification technology. In this case, the casing is lowered into the annulus and only selected sections of the material behind the casing are converted in elastic solid.
In a first example, as illustrated in
The gel will be added as a secondary injection either through the casing or through the annulus. The gel will be the continuous phase with a yield stress of the order of 10 Pa or higher and the material will deform plastically during casing expansion.
Using a gel with higher yield strength above 600 Pa, the sealing element may consist of a gel phase held in place by two supporting layers 74, 75 or plugs below and above the seal 70, as shown in
When gas migrates along the annulus of the wellbore and enters the sealing layer, it pushes the bottom of the gel upwards against the top cement plug. This compresses the gel against all surfaces and cracks and the gas is prevented from migrating further up the well bore.
Fluid-continuous phase composite sealants provide reliable seals under the most severe conditions while responding very rapidly to changes in wellbore dimensions caused by pressure, temperature, mechanical, or other shocks.
Several other methods can be used to place a fluid system in its predetermined location behind casing.
In a first delivery method, the sealing fluid 80 is transferred in a delivery tube 81 as shown in
The fluid 80 is placed inside the tube 81, with a small cement plug or wiper 812 inside the tube, above the fluid. This will maintain isolation of the fluid in the tube and allow good displacement when it is pumped out. In addition, when the wiper 812 is pumped against the bottom of the tube, it will form a seal to differential pressure so the isolating sleeve 85 on the cement shoe 82 can be closed.
The mechanical properties of the tube 81 are not particularly demanding. For most of the operation it remains pressure balanced. The flow ports in the top plug 813 ensures that the tube is pulled down the well from the bottom plug rather than being pushed down. It will see a small crushing pressure, due to the frictional pressure drop in the tube, when pumping the fluid out of the tube. At that stage however the fluid inside supports the tube.
Ideally, the tube 81 is made of a material which is soluble in the well, or in such a way that it can be drilled out as part of the subsequent drilling operation.
Though aspects of the above procedure are similar to the setting of a plug, e.g. a lead cement plug, the conventional cement head will require a launcher long enough to take the full length of the tube, which is typically in the order of 30 ft.
A typical operation includes some or all of the flowing steps: assembling a two-stage cement shoe into the casing string as it is run into hole, completing a first stage cement placement, cementing up to the second shoe, dropping a dart to open second shoe, pumping a second stage wash, pumping a second stage cement, following with the delivery tube loaded with seal material, displacing with desired completion fluid, seating the tube into the second shoe, pumping up to burst the disk using pressure, displacing sealing material from the tube, seating wiper into the bottom of the tube, pumping up to close isolation sleeves;—allowing material to set, and allowing the tube to be dissolved, or drill it out as part of a subsequent drilling operation.
Alternatively, the sealing liquid may be transferred to the downhole location in containers that are attached to or integral part of the casing string. This variant, as shown in
When the casing string is placed, a tool 95 can be lowered into the casing 91 that collapses the inner wall of the sealant reservoir 90 forcing the fluid through port-holes 92 in the outer wall of the casing. During placement, the port-holes are protected and sealed by burst discs 93. The inner reservoir wall may be made of thin metal sheets and may conveniently carry a plug element 94 opposite of the port-hole 92. With the tool action, the plug element 94 is forced into the port-holes 92 forming thus closing the hole after the passage of the sealing fluid.
The reservoirs can be placed anywhere along the length of the casing string. This removes the possible requirement to modify a casing point when placing the sealing material.
To place a sealing element behind avoiding modification of a particular casing point, a portion of casing and cement may be removed or crushed. This operation is routinely performed using cutting, perforating or drilling tools. In
After cutting through the casing 103 and cement 104, the cutting tool is then moved forward and the packers are inflated above and below the cut zone thus isolating the sealing section from the rest of the wellbore. Sealing material is then squeezed through the tubing and the ports into the cut-out section behind the casing and allowed to harden. After the fluid placement, the packers 101 are released and the tool is withdrawn. To close the casing, a casing patch is then run into the well and inflated over the treated zone to provide support for the sealing material.
According to another mode for carrying out the invention, the sealant composition can be pumped directly down the annulus between the metal casing and the formation. In this case, the sealant can be pumped by itself or as part of a fluid train that includes, for example, conventional cement, expanding cement, different sealant compositions, or the like.
In a variant of this placement method, the sealant could be placed by pumping through perforations, slots, or other gaps in the well tube. In this case, the area between the casing and the cement could be initially filled with a liquid, with a weak cement (such as a porous cement, or low density cement) or a gas. In general, the sealant would be pumped through some holes or gaps in the casing or liner and the original material would leave through others. Procedures to accomplish this are well known to those experienced in the art. As above, the sealant could be pumped alone, or as part of a fluid train.
When sealant is pumped as part of the fluid train in normal cementing operations, no additional downhole equipment is required. The operator can switch between pumping cement and pumping the sealant as required to form a reliable seal.
As shown in
Plug and abandonment operations may require different procedures. In some cases, the sealant is bull headed down the well bore. This may be preceded by pumping a train of fluids to clean the tubulars in the wellbore, and/or to help improve the quality of the seal between the metal and the sealant. Pumping the sealant may be followed by pumping of cement or other material. This may be done to fill the rest of the desired zone. It may be done with a high density material to maintain a compressive force on the sealant material. One or more types of sealants may be used in the process. They may be pumped in sequence of may be separated by cement or other desired material.
To improve the sealing, it may be required to drill into the formation, thus creating a clean surface for the bond between the sealant and the formation. Alternatively or additionally, perforations into the formation could be formed as an anchor for the sealant. Optionally, a train of fluids can be pumped to clean and pre-treat the formation to facilitate formation of a strong bond between the sealant and the formation. The sealant can then be placed as above, or by coiled tubing, or other methods known to those experienced in the art. As above, the sealant can be followed by other materials. This process can be repeated in a number of zones.
In remedial treatments, it is conceivable that the sealant would be pumped into the annulus between the cement and the formation or the cement and the casing/tubing or into any fractures that would develop in the cement sheath. In this case it is desired that the sealant forms a continuous barrier in the area in which it is pumped.
In fact, remedial actions may often be necessary and sealing elements may be periodically reinforced or reactivated by injection/release of fluid components internally, through the casing or by direct injection down the annulus.
For the above described methods, the sealing material may be based upon common elastomeric materials such as natural rubbers, acrylic rubbers, butadiene rubbers, polysulphide rubbers, fluorosilicone rubbers, hydrogenated nitrile rubbers, (per)fluoro elastomers, polyurethane rubbers, non-aqueous silicones and silicone rubbers, or cross-linked polyacrylamides. Further polymeric compounds suitable as sealing material include poly-diallyldimethylammonium chloride (polyDADMAC), a cationic water-soluble polymer, which crosslinks readily using for example N,N′ methylene bisacrylamide as linking agent.
Particularly suitable materials with a low viscosity during placement and low set modulus material are epoxy resin products, for example linear low molecular weight oligomeric polypropylene glycol terminated with an epoxy group at each end.
Amine crosslinking compounds can be used to link the epoxy resins, for example 2-methyl pentanediamine, m-xylene diamine; tetraethylene pentamine, diamino polypropylene glycol, diethylmethyl benzenediamine, derivatives of tall oil or mixture thereof. The epoxy resin curing reaction can be accelerated by a number of different types of compounds including organic acids and tertiary amines.
The sealing element may be a composite material comprising an elastic solid material and/or a dispersed filler material. Upon setting, the elastic material may constitute a matrix in which the filler is dispersed. The filler itself may be solid or may even be a gas in order to increase the compressibility of the composite.
In order to reinforce the above epoxy resins and to minimise sedimentation problems, a very fine grade barium sulphate filler was used to increase the density of the epoxy material rather than standard API barite
The Young's moduli of the set epoxy materials were measured by compressing 5 cm long, 2.5 cm diameter cylindrical samples axially using a load frame. Poisson's ratio was generally not measured, but on selected samples it was estimated either by a direct method of measuring compressibility using ultrasound or by measurement of the apparent modulus under confined conditions. All of the samples gave fairly linear stress vs. strain curves, and Young's moduli were calculated from the gradient of these curves in the stress range of 104 to 105 Pa (strain range 0.01-0.05).
It should be noted that all measurements were made at room temperature. It is customary for cement samples to be tested at room temperature only, as it has been demonstrated that cement moduli do not change dramatically as the samples are heated. This is unlikely to be the case for these materials. Rubbers generally become rather stiffer when heated, since the origin of their elasticity is the reduction in entropy of the polymer chains when they are stretched. Thus as temperature is increased the entropy loss per unit deformation increases and so does the modulus. Qualitative observation of samples of these filled epoxy materials, however, suggests that their moduli decrease somewhat with temperature.
With the above epoxy resin alone, the modulus was increased by a factor of approximately 3 on addition of the barite filler at 65% by mass (solid volume fraction being approximately 0.3).
For the unfilled samples of crosslinked epoxy resin a bulk modulus (1/compressibility) of 2.48 GPa was measured using the ultrasonic technique, and a value of 2.36 GPa was measured by axially compressing a sample held confined an open-ended, rigid steel cylinder on the load frame. These values were close to that of water (2.24 GPa) as expected. Poisson's ratio (ν) calculated from the bulk modulus (K) and the Young's modulus (E) according to the relation ν=(1−E/3K)/2 is 0.4998 in both cases. Such a high value (close to its limit of 0.5) is desirable in order to maintain the material in a state of compression over its whole cross-section in the annulus.
The performance of the above epoxy compound may be further enhanced using a blend of epoxy resins, for example a mixture of the above polypropylene glycol based resin with trimethylolpropanetriglycidyl ether:
Depending on filler content and volume ratio of the blend, Young's moduli can be set to be with the range of 2.6 to 70 Mpa. With a pure filled epoxy of trimethylolpropanetriglycidyl ether it is possible to set the modulus to as high as 608 Mpa.
A sample of Class G oilwell cement was mixed with water at a water/cement ratio of 0.44 (density=16 ppg). The mixture was poured into a 1 inch diameter steel tube with a pressure valve at its lower end. After pouring the cement a similar valve was attached to the other end and the tube was heated to 80° C. and pressurised to 2000 psi. After leaving the material to set for 24 hrs the pressure was released, and the upper valve removed. The space above the set plug of cement was filled with a hydraulic oil, and the valve replaced. The valve at the lower end of the tube was kept open, and the pressure of the hydraulic oil at the upper end of the tube was then increased to 3000 psi. Leakage of oil past the plug of material was observed after a short time at a rate of approximately 2 ml/hr.
70 g barium sulphate (Microbar 4C from Microfine Minerals, UK), 30 g of epoxy-terminated polypropylene glycol (Epikote 877 from Resolution Products) and 8.3 g of an amine-based crosslinker (Epikure 3055 from Resolution Products) were mixed together in a Waring blender. The resultant formulation had a viscosity of 530 cP at a shear rate of 100 s−1. After heating to 80° C. the formulation viscosity was reduced to 105 cP at the same shear rate. The mixture was poured into a 1 inch diameter steel tube with a pressure valve at its lower end. After pouring the formulation a similar valve was attached to the other end and the tube was pressurised to 2500 psi to set the material into a state of compression. After leaving the material to set for 24 hrs the pressure was released, and the upper valve removed. The space above the set plug of material was filled with a hydraulic oil, and the valve replaced. The valve at the lower end of the tube was kept open, and the pressure of the hydraulic oil at the upper end of the tube was then increased to 3000 psi. No leakage of oil past the plug of material was observed over an extended period.
Using the above method of establishing the Young's modulus, a modulus of 10 Mpa was measured for this example.
A similar experiment to that described in Example 2 was carried out, in which the walls of the steel tube were first roughened with glass paper and a thin film of a water-based drilling fluid was applied to the inside surface of the tube. A sample of the formulation described in Example 2 was then poured into the tube and it was pressurised and tested in the same way. Again, no leakage of oil past the plug of material was observed over an extended period at a pressure differential across the sample of 3000 psi.
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to be illustrative and not limitating. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0303881.7 | Feb 2003 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2004/000575 | 2/20/2004 | WO | 00 | 5/5/2006 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2004/074621 | 9/2/2004 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1336738 | Fletcher | Apr 1920 | A |
| 2231282 | Norris | Feb 1941 | A |
| 3272517 | Howard et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3750750 | Urbanosky | Aug 1973 | A |
| 4137970 | Laflin et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4339000 | Cronmiller | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4913232 | Cheymol et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5190109 | Pardo | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5358054 | Bert | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5361836 | Sorem et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5667010 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5992522 | Boyd et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6041858 | Arizmendi | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6050336 | Willauer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059033 | Ross et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6187839 | Eoff et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196316 | Bosma et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6244344 | Chatterji et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6286603 | Parent | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296054 | Kunz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6330917 | Chatterji et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6350309 | Chatterji et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6854522 | Brezinski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 20030178204 | Echols et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196820 | Patel | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20050199401 | Patel et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 370 301 | Jun 2002 | GB |
| 2 381 811 | May 2003 | GB |
| 0198627 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 0228560 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 0228560 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080023205 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
