In this digital age, modern telecommunication service providers and device manufacturers are increasingly relying on public and/or private IP networks, including the Internet, as a core part of their technology. For example, many telecommunications service providers now offer a suite of Voice over IP (“VoIP”) services, as well as various data services, that utilize IP networks and/or IP-based wireless access networks (e.g., access networks based on IEEE 802.16 (“WiMAX”), IEEE 802.20 Mobile Broadband Wireless Access (MBWA), Ultra Wideband (UWB), 802.11 wireless fidelity (“Wi-Fi”), Bluetooth, and similar standards) for at least part of their infrastructure. Likewise, device manufacturers are producing the next generation of mobile devices (e.g. wireless handhelds, wireless handsets, mobile phones, personal digital assistances, notebook computers, and similar devices) that are enabled to send and receive information utilizing IP-based telecommunications services. In fact, many of today's modern mobile devices are able to function as “dual-mode devices” that take advantage of both cellular network technologies and IP-based technologies.
Unlicensed Mobile Access (UMA) technology has developed as part of this trend to incorporate IP solutions into mobile device telecommunication systems. UMA technology has recently been accepted into Release 6 of the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and is also referred to as Generic Access Network (GAN) technology. In various implementation schemes, UMA allows wireless service providers to merge cellular networks, such as Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) networks and IP-based wireless networks into one seamless service (with one mobile device, one user interface, and a common set of network services for both voice and data). One goal of UMA is to allow subscribers to move transparently between cellular networks and IP-based wireless networks with seamless voice and data session continuity, much like they can transparently move between cells within the cellular network. Seamless in-call handover between the IP-based wireless network and the cellular network ensures that the users location and mobility do not affect the services delivered to the user.
At an operational level, UMA technology effectively creates a parallel radio access network, the UMA network, which interfaces to the mobile core network using standard mobility-enabled interfaces. For example, UMA can replace a system's GSM radio technology on the lower protocol layers with a wireless LAN, or similar technology. A call or other communication may be tunneled to the Mobile Switching Center (MSC) of a mobile service provider via an access point (e.g., a WiFi access point connected to a modem via the Internet) and gateway (e.g., a UMA network controller). In many cases, the mobile core network remains unchanged, making it much easier to maintain full service and operational transparency and allowing other aspects of the service infrastructure to remain in place. For example, in many systems that utilize UMA, the existing service provider's business support systems (BSS), service delivery systems, content services, regulatory compliance systems, and operation support systems (OSS) can support the UMA network without change. Likewise, service enhancements and technology evolution of the mobile core network apply transparently to both cellular access and UMA.
As the incorporation of IP solutions, such as UMA, into mobile device telecommunication systems expands, wireless service providers and wireless users may face various obstacles. One challenge involves properly configuring or troubleshooting access points as they are deployed or when they are operating in the field. For example, as the number of access points deployed in the field grows, a larger number of access points may need periodic servicing, including changing or updating the configuration of individual access points. Because of the larger number of access points that may need support, service support may become increasingly difficult to provide.
The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding of, and enabling description for, various embodiments of the technology. One skilled in the art will understand that the technology may be practiced without these details. In some instances, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the technology. It is intended that the terminology used in the description presented below be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain embodiments of the technology. Although certain terms may be emphasized below, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this Detailed Description section.
I. Sample Network Configurations
In a communication or set of communications 20, the access point 15 receives IP packets from the mobile device 25. These IP packets are then transported through the IP network 40 to a signaling gateway 45, which in the example of
The network system 10 of
Referring to
In general, the described network system 100 accepts registration requests and communication connections from the mobile device 110. The accepted registration requests can be requests to either the cellular telephone network or to the IP-based network 150. Accordingly, to handle requests to the cellular telephone network, the cellular telephone network includes one or more cell towers 120 that are configured to accept cellular communications 112 from the mobile device 110. The cell towers 120 are connected to a base station controller 176 (such as a base station controller/radio network controller (BSC/RNC)) via a private network 130. The private network 130 can include a variety of connections (not shown) such as T1 lines, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), various network switches, and other similar components.
The base station controller 176 controls communication traffic to a carrier core network 190, where all communications are managed (including both cellular and IP-based). Components of the carrier core network 190 in this example include a switch (e.g., a mobile switching center or MSC) 192, which is configured to control data/call flows and perform load balancing, as well as other functions. The carrier core network 190 may also include a variety of system databases such as an operation support subsystem (OSS) database 194, a business support system (BSS) database 196, and home location register (HLR) 198 or other central subscriber database that contains details of a carrier's subscribers for billing, call logging, etc.
The sample network system 100 of
When the mobile device 110 attempts to access the IP network 150 (i.e., to initiate an IP-based communication), information (e.g., data, voice, SMS, etc.) is initially formatted in the cellular system's native protocol and then encapsulated into Internet Protocol (IP) packets, which are transmitted to the access point 140 and routed through the IP network 150 to a security gateway 171. In contrast to non-IP communication requests, such transmissions bypass the cellular telephone system's existing network of radio towers. The security gateway 171 controls access to a network controller 166, which communicates with a data store 168 for logging and accessing communications data. Thus, one function of the network controller 166 is to manage access to the carrier network 190 when dealing with an IP-based communication (in a similar manner to that performed by the base station controller 176 for a non-IP-based communication).
In one example, authentication of a request for access by the mobile device 110 over the IP network 150 is handled by the security gateway 171, which communicates with an authentication, access and authorization (AAA) module 172 that is most likely associated with the carrier network 190. Challenges and responses to requests for access by the mobile device 110 are communicated between the HLR 198 and the AAA module 172. When authorization is granted, the security gateway 171 communicates the assignment of an IP address to the mobile device 110 that requested access. Once the security gateway 171 passes the IP address to the mobile device 110, the public IP address assigned to the mobile device 110 is passed to the network controller 166.
In another authorization example, upon receiving an identifier from the mobile device 110, the network controller 166 may query the data store 168 (see, e.g.,
In some cases, the signaling portion of a communication (e.g., the portion of the communication that governs various overhead aspects of the communication such as, for example, when the call starts, when the call stops, initiating a telephone ring, etc.) is routed through the network controller 166 to the switch 192, while the voice bearer portion of the communication (e.g., the portion of the communication that contains the actual content (either data or voice information) of the communication) is routed through the network controller 166 to a media gateway 182 (see, e.g.
II. Managing Access Point Functionality and Configuration
Customers of a wireless service provider often do not know much about the technology that they are using. In particular, customers who own or operate an access point do not know much about its operation and accordingly cannot give service support representatives accurate information regarding their access point. For example, a customer who is not computer literate may be unable to make necessary configuration changes to his or her access point even with the guidance of a technician. Alternatively, many computer-literate customers can make changes to their access points, but few, if any, keep records of changes they make, making it difficult for a customer to remember what has changed in order to narrow the search for the cause of an issue resulting from one of their changes. Further, an access point provider may, on occasion, wish to update the functionality of the access points it has provided. For example, a hacker may have discovered a security flaw or the provider may simply desire to release new features to access point owners. Changing access point functionality often requires the application of an update. Customers may not apply these updates due to lack of time or interest, or may not be knowledgeable enough about access points that they feel comfortable deploying an update to their access point. Either of these situations could leave a customer's access point vulnerable to hostile attacks that can cause serious problems.
In contrast to conventional access points, aspects of individual access points 15 (
A. Representative Access Point
In many embodiments, the access point 140 in which one or more examples of access point management may be implemented, can includes one or more CPUs (e.g., a processor), an input/output component, a wireless telecommunication component, and a memory. The CPU can coordinate communications between the input/output component, the wireless telecommunication component, and the memory. The CPU can also execute processing instructions (stored at the memory) for producing one or more status reports regarding the access point and for triggering the uploading of such a status report to a server, such as the servers 60 (
In operation, the access point 140 serves as a communication link between mobile devices connected to the wireless telecommunication component and a computer network coupled to the input/output component. In some embodiments, such a communication link includes a non-cellular (or WiFi) wireless link. In other embodiments, the communication link includes a cellular wireless link that is established at an access point (and not a cell tower). For example, the access point 140 can include an IP-enabled femtocell or other type of consumer premises equipment (CPE). The status report, accordingly, pertains to information regarding the communication link between the mobile devices and the computer network. It will be appreciated that in other examples, other components may be added to or omitted from the access point 140, and a status report may reflect such an addition or omission. For example, an access point may also be integrated with a broadband modem (see, e.g.,
B. Triggering Events
Alternatively, the access point may automatically or semi-automatically initiate the upload of a status report based on the occurrence of other types of trigger events, such as when the access point detects a conflict on its communication channel, when congestion occurs at the access point, when the access point detects that a certain interval has passed since the last time it uploaded a configuration, when an alarm condition occurs, or when any other condition chosen by the access point manufacturer or service provider is satisfied. Further, under some circumstances, the service provider or someone operating on behalf of the service provider may remotely initiate the upload of a status report.
Once the trigger event 305 occurs, a secure connection is negotiated between the access point 140 and the server 190. For example, the access point 140 can retrieve the URL that is stored in the access point. The access point can accordingly use DNS to request an IP address for the server to which the URL points. If the access point obtains an IP address, it makes a request 310 of server 190 using the obtained IP address via a network protocol, such as HTTPS. If the server 190 does not respond to the request 310, the access point 140 may log this event internally and cease further processing, or it may retry the request after an arbitrary interval. In the example pictured in
C. Status Reports
The status report may contain information about the configuration, settings, status, and other information about the access point, including the communication link provided by the access point. For example, the status report may contain information such as the number of mobile devices that are connected to the wireless telecommunication side of an access point (including over a period of time), the number of populated/unpopulated 8P8C/RJ-11/RJ-45 jacks at the access point, the number of devices that have attempted to connect to the access point, and the number of such attempts which have been successful/unsuccessful. This information may also include connection and lease times associated with mobile devices, IP and MAC addresses of these devices, and the types of applications that have been historically run by such devices. Other information can include other access points or wireless telecommunication networks neighboring the access point, the signal strengths of these access points, the number of available channels at these access points, whether these access points (or networks) are locked, the type of stations that are connected to adjacent access points or networks, as well as the call history (i.e., to customer service) associated with these and other access points. Further, status reports can provide link or signal quality indicators associated with specific connections, intervals, etc.
Status reports may also be user-configured, for example, allowing a customer to select which type of information is contained in a status report and ultimately communicated to the server. Further, status reports may be communicated (from the server) to various other components, including the HLR.
In general, the server 190 stores the status report received from the access point in a database (not shown) so that it may be accessed in the future. The information stored in the database may include the identity of the access point providing the status report, the date and time that the status report was generated, and the contents of the status report. Below is a representative status report that may be transmitted to a server from an access point in an XML format. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the content, format, and organization of the status report could be varied significantly from that shown below without affecting the functionality described herein.
D. Response Messages
Returning to
E. Service Support
A service support representative can use a computer coupled to a computer network (e.g., IP network 40 (
F. Configuration Files
In addition to or in lieu of a response message, a configuration file may be downloaded from the server 190 to the access point 140 in order to add new settings to the access point or to change the existing settings of the access point.
Once the configuration file is received by the access point 140, the access point processes the received file and applies the new or changed settings to its configuration. Adding or changing a setting may trigger the access point to reboot in order to make the settings operational. After applying the settings, the access point sends a communication 420 containing a status report with the access point's settings to the server 190. Sending a status report to the server enables the server to confirm that the settings have been correctly applied. After receiving the status report and verifying that the access point is correctly configured, the server 190 sends a confirmation message 430 to the access point. In several embodiments, the server cannot initiate the transmission of a configuration file, but can only send such a configuration file upon receiving a status report. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the server can only send a configuration file or response when directed to do so by a carrier network (e.g., via an HLR).
G. Disabling/Enabling Status Reporting
One of the settings that may be sent in a configuration file is a setting that disables the access point from sending a status report to a server when events occur that would normally have triggered the sending a status report. This change to access point behavior occurs when the setting DISABLE_STATUS_REPORT is changed to “OFF” at the access point. When the DISABLE_STATUS_REPORT setting is “OFF” an access point will send status reports to a server only when specifically requested to do so by a user or operator. The user or operator may request the access point to send a status report using a computer that is coupled to the access point 140. The disable status report setting may be particularly useful to a service provider to control the number of status reports that they receive from access points that are within the service provider's network. The service provider is able to thereby selectively determine which groups of access points need to be monitored and control the frequency of access point monitoring.
H. Firmware Upgrading
On a periodic basis, the firmware of the access point may need to be updated. Updating the firmware may be necessary, for example, to correct a security vulnerability, to correct or improve performance problems at an access point, to add new functionality or to change existing functionality, or to address other service provider, manufacturer, or third party issues.
It will be appreciated that although the process described in
III. Conclusion
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the system is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the system to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the system are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the system, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, some network elements are described herein as performing certain functions. Those functions could be performed by other elements in the same or differing networks, which could reduce the number of network elements. Alternatively or additionally, network elements performing those functions could be replaced by two or more elements to perform portions of those functions. In addition, while processes, message/data flows, or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes, message/data flows, or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the actual implementation of a database may take a variety of forms, and the term “database” is used herein in the generic sense to refer to any data structure that allows data to be stored and accessed, such as tables, linked lists, arrays, etc.
The teachings of the methods and system provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the technology can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the technology.
These and other changes can be made to the invention in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the technology, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the technology disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the technology should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the technology with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the invention under the claims.
While certain aspects of the technology are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the technology in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the invention is recited as embodied in a computer-readable medium, other aspects may likewise be embodied in a computer-readable medium. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the technology.
This application is a U.S. National Stage application of International Application No. PCT/US07/82285, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING ACCESS POINT FUNCTIONALITY AND CONFIGURATION, filed Oct. 23, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/862,595, filed Oct. 23, 2006 each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/082285 | 10/23/2007 | WO | 00 | 7/9/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/052004 | 5/2/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4998271 | Tortola et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5513263 | White et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6493629 | Van Bosch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6612489 | McCormick et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6615035 | Lucidarme et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6985583 | Brainard et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7110545 | Furuya et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7295556 | Roese et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7346678 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353017 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376221 | Remy et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7433673 | Everson et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7529256 | Pathan | May 2009 | B2 |
7574207 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7577458 | Lin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7610062 | Beeman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7701947 | Cunetto et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7773579 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792093 | Myhre et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7843903 | Bakke et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864673 | Bonner | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8160614 | Shaffer | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8320344 | Hodroj et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340711 | Glass et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
20010030235 | Hedemann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010052006 | Barker et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020147926 | Pecen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157090 | Anton, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188581 | Fortin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030119480 | Mohammed | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040078708 | Li et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040128345 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133689 | Vasisht | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137908 | Sinivaara et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040192299 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203815 | Shoemake et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050026650 | Russell | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054342 | Otsuka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063542 | Ryu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078819 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083911 | Grabelsky et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086346 | Meyer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090259 | Jain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094592 | Schmidt | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114504 | Marolia et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050159149 | Wen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160287 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174992 | Files et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181805 | Gallagher | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050243809 | Best et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060068769 | Adya et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075485 | Funahashi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121941 | Shiflett | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060198361 | Chen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215668 | Sethi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223498 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256800 | Harrington et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270448 | Huotari et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293024 | Benco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293038 | Walter et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293082 | Neuhaus | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008885 | Bonner | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026862 | Hicks et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049342 | Mayer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079113 | Kulkarni et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070115900 | Liang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123231 | Kim | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140163 | Meier et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168553 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177562 | Castrogiovanni et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195803 | Lowery et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080020773 | Black et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046998 | Cromer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080095086 | Linkola et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080151866 | Wu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160914 | McRae et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189550 | Roundtree | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219223 | Bienas et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254833 | Keevill et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311917 | Marathe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043876 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074187 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085760 | Lee | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132675 | Horn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154701 | Kosaraju et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163245 | Oozeki | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090215394 | Dewan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220216 | Marsh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287922 | Herwono et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100014506 | Linkola et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014507 | Linkola et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056114 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100190492 | Jiang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100235621 | Winkler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265845 | Lampen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110299686 | Saboff et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130083785 | Hodroj et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130084823 | Glass et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130178217 | Keevill et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2666472 | Aug 2010 | CA |
1530321 | May 2005 | EP |
1865656 | Dec 2007 | EP |
WO-2004102941 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2006018047 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006034399 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006028455 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006062907 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006078430 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006135285 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007015075 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008013977 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008036938 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2010099229 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report and Opinion, EP Patent Application 07854249, mailed Jun. 4, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Wi-Fi Certified™ for Wi-Fi Protected Setup™: Easing the User Experience for Home and Small Office Wi-Fi® Networks,” © 2007, 2008, 2009 Wi-Fi Alliance, 14 pages. |
Belkin International, Inc., “Belkin N1 Vision Wireless Router User Manual,” Jul. 11, 2007, 117 pages. |
“AirStation One-Touch Secure System (AOSS),” White paper downloaded from www.buffalo-technology.com on May 27, 2009 bearing a date of Oct. 2004, Buffalo technology (USA), Inc., pp. 1-7. |
“Dontronics, USB to RJ-11 VoIP Phone Adaptor,” http://www.dontronics.com/phoneconnector.html, [date accessed Apr. 19, 2006], 7 pages. |
“Frequently Asked Questions: Wi-Fi Protected Setup,” Wi-Fi Alliance 2006, pp. 1-4. |
“IVT Corporation, Bluetooth PSTN Voice AP,” http://www.ivtcorporation.com/products/ap/index.php, [date accessed Apr. 19, 2006], 3 pages. |
“Telco Systems: A BATM Company, Access200 Product Family Voice over IP Analog Telephone Adapters,” Copyright 2005 Telco Systems, 2 pages. |
“Vonage and Motorola Announce a Co-Branded Internet Telephone Adaptor with Wireless Router,” PR Newswire (U.S.), Mar. 14, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Wi-Fi Protected Setup,” Wi-Fi Alliance 2007, http:www.wi-fi.org/wifi-protected-setup/ [Accessed on Sep. 28, 2010], 2 pages. |
Bertolucci, Jeff, “Vonage's Flashy V-Portal Offers Easier VoIP Setup,” PC World Communications, Apr. 1, 2008, 1 page. |
Greene, Tim, “Vonage Tailors VoIP for Small Firms: Flat-fee Dialing Includes Local, Long-Distance Calls,” Network World, Jun. 23, 2003, 2 pages. |
Helander, Johannes et al., “Secure Web Services for Low-Cost Devices,” Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'05), May 18-20, 2005, pp. 130-139. |
Honan, Mathew, “I Am Here: One Man's Experience With the Location-Aware Lifestyle,” Wired Magazine: 17.2, <http://www.wired.com/gadgets/wireless/magazine/17-02/lp—guineapig?currentPage=all>, [date accessed Sep. 28, 2010], pp. 1-7. |
Houghton, Mike, “Cellular Modems: 3G Access on the Move,” article downloaded from www.enterpriseplanet.com on May 27, 2009 bearing a date of May 25, 2006, Enterprise IT Planet, 4 pages. |
IEEE-SA Standards Board, IEEE Std. 802.11, 1999 Edition, Reaffirmed 2003, 37 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/026715; filed on Mar. 9, 2010, Applicant: T-Mobile USA, Inc., Mailed on Oct. 18, 2010, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2007/82010, filed on Oct. 19, 2007, Applicant: T-Mobile USA, Inc., Date of Mailing: Jun. 16, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2007/82010, filed on Oct. 19, 2007, Applicant: T-Mobile USA, Inc., Date of Mailing: Jun. 18, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2007/82285, filed on Oct. 23, 2007, Applicant: T-Mobile USA, Inc., Date of Mailing: Mar. 10, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/051072, filed on Jul. 17, 2009, Applicant: T-Mobile USA, Inc., Date of Mailing: Nov. 6, 2009, 12 pages. |
Lazarowitz, Elizabeth, “Easy Call: Phoning Via Web,” New York Daily News, Feb. 5, 2007, New York, 3 pages. |
N1 Wireless Router User Manual, Belkin International, Inc., 2007, 104 pages. |
Shaw, Keith, “VoIP Invades the Home Network,” Network World, Aug. 30, 2004, 1 page. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT Application PCT/US2010/025271, mailed Dec. 28, 2010, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion, PCT Application PCT/US2010/025271, mailed Dec. 28, 2010, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, EP Patent Application 07854358.4, mailed Feb. 6, 2014, 8 pages. |
Nikolaidis, Apostolos E. et al. “Management Traffic in Emerging Remote Configuration Mechanisms for Residential Gateways and Home Devices,” IEEE Communications Magazine, May 2005, pp. 154-162. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120317224 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60862595 | Oct 2006 | US |