The present invention relates generally to electronic commerce and more particularly to management of funds allocation in an electronic network.
Recently, with the tremendous growth of the Internet, numerous Internet based companies have emerged which provide a service which allows individuals to pay all of their bills online at a single Web-site. Such companies include Statusfactory.com®, Paytrust.com®, and Paymybills.com®, to name but a few. Individuals can have their bills redirected to one of the aforementioned companies who capture their bills and present them to the individual on a Web-site. The individual can then pay his or her bills directly through the Web-site and/or set up rules for the automatic payment of any bills received. Individuals using such sites, therefore, no longer have to review each bill sent to them from creditors, write checks out to those creditors, and post the checks to each creditor thus saving time, and costs such as stamp costs and any late payment charges should they fail to pay a bill on time. It has been estimated that about 30 million households currently make use of online banking and bill payment.
Such services, however, are typically only directed at individuals. To date, no easy means exists which addresses the problems that arise when individuals participating in group related activities spend money on behalf of the group. Group activities, such as joint ventures, ski trips, bachelor parties, shared households, office lunch groups, and clubs and organizations often lead to complicated settlement arrangements. For example, consider the life of three roommates: one person buys supplies for a housewarming party, while another pays the gas and phone bill. The third roommate pays the electric bill and for a pizza on Superbowl Sunday. The financial inter-obligations become unwieldy with only a few transactions. This problem arises any time individuals spend money together, not just in shared household situations where it is estimated that there are 74 million shared households in the U.S. (American Housing Survey for the United States: 1997), but also for office lunch groups, clubs, events, parties, wish lists, investment groups, wagering pools, organizations, clubs, or the like.
Person-to-person (P2P) payment providers such as PayPal.com® and PayMe.com® have emerged that offer payments and payment requests from one consumer to another. A popular application of this P2P technology involves the payment for goods purchased at online auction sites. While the P2P providers offer robust payment options for consumers, including a transaction history for individuals, none address the need for group accounting. These are payment solutions only and do not allow for the tracking of expenses and transactions unless a payment has occurred.
Furthermore, companies such as Intuit® offers a personal accounting software. Personal accounting software allows individuals to track their personal expenses and transactions on an on-going basis. Again, however, there is no group accounting functionality available and there are no features designed to track group expenses and group transactions.
Therefore, a convenient system whereby group members can view, split, balance a group's finances, pay group expenses, and deposit money into a group account would be highly desirable.
For a better understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Network 100 connects a plurality of group members 102 to 110, and financial institutions 112 to at least one application server 164. This connection is made via a communication network 114 which may for example comprise an Intranet, wireless network, or preferably the Internet. The connection is made via communication links 162, which may, for example, be-coaxial cable, copper wire (including PSTN), optical fiber, wireless, microwave, or satellite links.
For ease of explanation, the individual or entity that controls the application server 164 will hereinafter be referred to as the service provider. It should be understood that the group members, financial institutions, and/or the service provider may be individuals, businesses, organizations or the like. Furthermore, the service provider and the financial institutions may be distinct entities or a single entity.
As used herein, a group member is defined as any individual who forms part of a group set up by group members with the service provider. Financial institutions, as used herein, incorporates all financial services organizations, such as banks or the like.
Application server 164 preferably comprises at least one data processor or central processing unit (CPU) 158, a memory 116, user interface devices 156, a communications interface circuit 160, and at least one bus 154 that interconnects these elements. Memory 116 preferably includes an operating system 118 (such as Windows NT™, Linux™, or MacOS™), which stores instructions for communicating, processing data, accessing data, storing data, searching data, etc. Memory 116 also includes remote access procedures 120, email procedures 142, accounting procedures 144, funds-in procedures 146, funds-out procedures 148, Web server procedures 150, Web pages 152, and a group database 124. Group database 124 preferably includes group profiles 126 and 134. Each group profile 126 or 134 preferably contains a number of member profiles 130, 132, 138, and 140. Each member profile 130, 132, 138, or 140 preferably contains member information, such as group member details, member account details, financial institution details, etc. Each group profile 126 or 134 preferably also includes a rule module 128 or 136. The various procedures and the group database 124 will be explained in further detail below.
Group members 102 to 110 typically access the communication network 114 via remote client computing devices, such as desktop computers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), or the like. The financial institutions 112 include a financial institution server similar to the application server 164. The client computing devices and financial institution server preferably also include a data processor or central processing unit (CPU), user interface devices, communications interface circuits, memory, and buses similar to those described in relation to application server 164.
Group members 102 to 110 preferably connect to the communication network 114 using an Internet browser, such as Microsoft's Internet Explorer® or Netscape's Navigator®), via their computing device's communication interface circuit, which preferably comprises a modem or network interface card (NIC). The path of data between the computing devices and the communication network is preferably: Internet Browser →Winsock (TCP/IP module of Windows®)→(modem or NIC)→ISP Modem or Hub→Router→Internet. Once connected to the communication network, the group members navigate to a uniform resource locator (URL) pointing to the application server's home Web-site. The application server 164 then delivers Web pages 152 using Web server procedures 150.
The system then determines (step 220) whether the group member would like to view the details for any of the groups that he/she belongs to. If the group member would like to view a group's details, the system generates and displays a summary page for a selected group (step 222), an embodiment of which is shown in
If the system determines that the member would not like to view a selected group's transaction details (step 312) the system then determines whether the group member would like to add a new transaction (step 320). The new transaction may be a new group expense or a payment from a group member to a group. If the system determines that a group member would like to add a new transaction (step 320), a “add new transaction page” is generated and displayed to the group member (step 326), an embodiment of which is shown in
Once the group member has added a new transaction, the new transaction details are received (step 328) and added to that specific group's profile (128 and 134 of
The system then determines whether the transaction involves a payment to or from a group fund (step 412). A group fund is a fund set up by the group members for a special purpose. Such a fund might be a “car pool fund”, “a gift fund”, “a phone bill fund” or any of a variety of account used to collect commitments and unallocated expenses. For example, a fund might be set up to purchase a gift where everyone is asked to put in $50 beforehand. In this case, a commitment of $50 is collected in the group fund from each member. If the transaction involves a payment to or from a group fund, then an allocation to a specific group fund and an assignment between individual group members of that group fund is made (step 410). All financial balancing calculations are preferably undertaken using standard accounting mathematics.
During any of its accounting calculations, the system preferably round off all original expense values to a new expense value having a predefined number of decimal places, and distributes a difference between the new expense value and the original expense value to a rounding account of a third party, preferably the service provider. For example, say an expense of $10 must be split between three group members, John, Nancy and Susan. Each group member would, therefore, owe $10/3=$3.333. . . . The system may round the amount owed to a set number of decimal places. If John paid $10 for an expense to be split among John, Nancy, and Susan, the expense is rounded up to $3.34 for each person. If, however, John owes $10 for an expense to be split among John, Nancy, and Susan, then the expense is rounded down to $3.33, which is paid to each group member. In both cases, the remainder of $0.1 is credited to a rounding account for the benefit of a group or a third party, such as the service provider. After the system determines whether the transaction involves a payment to or from a group fund (step 412), the system determines whether during any of its accounting calculations, a remainder was generated (step 416) and if so assigns the remainder to the rounding account (step 416).
The system then determines (step 420) whether any members have been deleted or have left a group. When members are deleted from the group, their balance is assigned to a “Deleted Members” account for non-members (step 418). The group may allocate those funds whenever they wish. This allocation may be a proportional split between group members or may vary depending on the rules module (128 or 136 of
The system then preferably determines whether according to the rules module, a group member should be charged interest for paying late or should be paid interest for paying early. Such a charge or payment of interest is established either by the group members or by the service provider. For example, an investment group may require an appropriate economic return to members that pay for stocks on behalf of other members. An alternative embodiment utilizes an interest spread where a group member is charged a higher interest for a late payment than that payed out to an group member who makes an early payment. A third party, such as the service provider, retains the difference between the interest received and the interest payed out (the interest difference). For example, a group member who makes an early payment may be paid say 19% interest on the funds payed until such time as the expense is due. A group member who pays after the expense is due may be charged 21% interest until such time that he/she pays the group. The difference between the 21% and the 19%, i.e. 2%, is kept by the service provider. Therefore, the system determines (step 424) whether any interest is due, and assigns the interest to the necessary accounts (step 422). In the case where an interest spread is used, the interest difference may be assigned to a separate interest account or to the rounding account. The system then generates and displays the summary page (step 222 of
Returning to
If the member does not want to change his/her options (step 314), the system then determines if any member would like to settle up his/her obligations (pay what is owed) to the group account (step 322). If a member would like to settle up, a “settle up page” is generated (step 324) wherein a member can enter information to settle up his/her obligations, such as financial institution information, account numbers, amounts, etc. This payment information is received (step 330), the account is balanced (step 332), and depending on the page the member was previously viewing, the member is displayed either the group summary page (216 of
If a member does not want to settle up, the system determines whether a member would like to ask the other members of a group to settle up (step 334). If the system determines that a member would like to ask the other members of a group to settle up, the system contacts the other members, preferably via email, to settle up the group account (step 336). Depending on the page the member was previously viewing, the member is displayed either the group summary page (216 of
If the system determines that the member does not want to join another existing group (step 504), the system then determines whether the member would like to start a new group (step 514). If the member would like to start a new group, a “new group page” is generated (step 512) and new group details are received (step 516) and saved in a new group profile. The system then determines whether the member would like to exit the system (step 518). If the member would like to exit the system, the member is exited from the secure part of the system and the start page is displayed (step 202 of
Each group has a group type associated with it. So, one may have a “roommate” type group, a “party” type of group, or an “office pool” type of group. Each group has a given set of categories associated with it. Additionally, each group can add group specific categories. Categories preferably include “All categories”, expenses, withdrawals, deposits, and any default or custom categories associated with the specific group. After adjusting the dates and pull down menus, the member clicks on the “search” button 1010 to initiate the search for the adjusted-transaction history details which are then displayed. Individual transactions may be deleted or modified by clicking on the “delete” 1012 or “modify” 1014 buttons respectively. The member may return to the “specific group's summary page” by clicking on the “Group detail” button 1030.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the accompanying claims. For example, members may pay funds into an account or withdraw funds from an account using a P2P system. In particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, and not limited to the foregoing description. Furthermore, it should be noted that the order in which the process is performed may vary without substantially altering the outcome of the process.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/025,223 filed on Feb. 4, 2008 and entitled “Method For Managing Group Finances Via An Electronic Network,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/633,962 filed on Aug. 08, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,343,335 issued on Mar. 11, 2008 and entitled “Method For Managing Group Finances Via An Electronic Network,” both being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3983481 | Nutt et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5778178 | Arunachalum | Jul 1998 | A |
5826243 | Musmanno et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5864830 | Armetta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5884280 | Yoshioka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903721 | Sixtus | May 1999 | A |
5905736 | Ronen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5953710 | Fleming | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5987500 | Arunachalam | Nov 1999 | A |
6021943 | Chastain | Feb 2000 | A |
6029147 | Horadan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044360 | Picciallo | Mar 2000 | A |
6047270 | Joao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055360 | Inoue et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6212556 | Arunachalam | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219650 | Friend et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235176 | Schoen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6324523 | Killeen, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327578 | Linehan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338047 | Wallman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6522395 | Bamji et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6604086 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609113 | O'Leary et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615183 | Kolls | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622128 | Bedell et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629080 | Kolls | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6796497 | Benkert et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6839689 | Aieta et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6882979 | Reay et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7031939 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7092913 | Cannon, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103576 | Mann, III et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7158753 | Kagan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184979 | Carson | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7343335 | Olliphant | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356507 | Bezos et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398252 | Neofytides et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7580856 | Pliha | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7925591 | Gajjala et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8364566 | Olliphant | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20010056395 | Khan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020052841 | Guthrie et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055909 | Fung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095372 | Likourezos et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095376 | Likourezos et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095377 | Likourezos et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128932 | Yung et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143647 | Headings et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152179 | Racov | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169662 | Claiborne | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198847 | Fahraeus | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030097331 | Cohen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120505 | Spiegel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135470 | Beard | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030220835 | Barnes, Jr. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040030601 | Pond et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039694 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058694 | Mendiola et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040103060 | Foth et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148254 | Hauser | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040192297 | Erskine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210517 | Brooks et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050096977 | Rossides | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108117 | Newman | May 2005 | A1 |
20060064378 | Clementz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060167791 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229998 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070005432 | Likourezos et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070118476 | Likourezos et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156580 | Imrey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080195510 | Olliphant | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228615 | Scipioni et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228637 | Scipioni et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228638 | Scipioni et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090112763 | Scipioni et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119207 | Grecia | May 2009 | A1 |
20120271707 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1291673 | Mar 2003 | EP |
WO-2006034265 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006034265 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006105202 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006105202 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006105202 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Amazon Flexible Payments Service (Amazon FPS)”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://payments.amazon.com/sdui/sdui/business?sn=devfps/o>, (2009), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962 Response filed Oct. 28, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2004”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Appeal Brief filed Oct. 11, 2005”, 31 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2005”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2003”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2006”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2003”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2004”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 17, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Response filed Apr. 17, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2006”, 2 pgs. |
“Application U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Response filed May 28, 2004 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2003”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Response filed Aug. 28, 2003 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2003”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 31, 2007”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Appeal Brief Filed Mar. 20, 2008”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Examiner's answer mailed Oct. 9, 2008 to Appeal Brief filed Mar. 20, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Non Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2006”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710 , Response filed Dec. 27, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Aug. 3, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Reply Brief filed Dec. 9, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Response Filed Jun. 21, 2011 to Non-Final Office Action Received Apr. 6, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Response filed Aug. 25, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2011”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
Jagolinzer, Philip, “Personal Financial Planning: How to divide the family income”, Ohio CPA Journal vol. 54, No. 2, (Apr. 1995), 39-40. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Sep. 21, 2007”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jul. 24, 2007”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411 , Response filed Aug. 25, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 8, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 19, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 12, 2011”, 34 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Examiner's Answer mailed Jan. 30, 2012”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2009”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2011”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2009”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Pre-Appeal Brief Request Oct. 10, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 23, 2007”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 25, 2005”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Response filed Mar. 29, 2010 to Non Final Offie Action mailed Dec. 28, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Response filed May 27, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Response filed Jun. 2, 2011 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2011”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Response filed Oct. 18, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,411, Response filed Oct. 28, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 1, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Pre-Appeal Brief filed Mar. 6, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Response filed Feb. 6, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2011”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Response filed Apr. 27, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 11/493,112, First Examiner Report mailed Mar. 10, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006230277, Response filed Jan. 8, 2010 to First Examiner Report mailed Mar. 10, 2009”, 17 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010201969, Office Action Response filed Feb. 15, 2012”, 18 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010201969, First Examiner Report mailed Mar. 16, 2011”, 2 Pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680014449.7, Office Action mailed Jul. 29, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No, 200680014449.7, Response filed Dec. 13, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 29, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 14 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680014449.7, Office Action mailed Mar. 15, 2011”, with English translation of claims, (14 pgs). |
“European Application Serial No. 06739940.2, Extended European Search Report Mailed Dec. 21, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/011475, International Search Report mailed Dec. 12, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms”, IEEE 100, Seventh Edition IEEE Standards Information Network/IEEE Press, (Dec 1, 2000), 37 pgs. |
“Using your Cellphone as a Credit Card”, The Wall Street Journal Online, WSJ.com, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/access/983215801.html?dids=983215801:983215801&FMT=FT&FMTS=>, (Feb. 8, 2006). |
Arrington, Michael, “Everyone Send Me $5”, Tech Crinch Article and Comments, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/15/everyone-send-me-5>, (Feb. 15, 2006), 13 pgs. |
Cheong, Yu Chye, “Payments in Mobile Commerce”, Telecom Media Networks, Wireless Internet Centre, http://www.apc.capgemini.com/industry/telecom/attachments/Payments%20in%20Mobile%20Commerce.pdf, (2002), 1-25. |
Choi, Hyungki, et al “Design of secure mobile payment”, ICU PowerPoint Presentation, (Apr. 3, 2002), 1-7. |
Cricket Communications, “Get Customer Support—FAQ's”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.mycricket.comn/Cust—svc—opt—feat.aspx> (observed Feb. 2, 2005), (Copyright 2005), 6 pages. |
Ding, Melissa Soo, “Reconsidering the Challenges of mPayments: A Roadmap to Plotting the Potential of the Future mCommerce Market”, 16th Bled eCommerce Conference, eTransformation, Bled, Slovenia, (Jun. 9-11, 2003), 873-884. |
Focarelli, D., et al., “Why Do Banks Merge?”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking vol. 34, No. 4, (Nov. 2002), 1047-1066. |
Godfrey, Mike, “Panama Bank Merge to Form Biggest Banking Group in Central America”, Tax-news.com, New York Tuesday, (May 2000), 5 pgs. |
Kreyer, Nina, “Characteristics of Mobile Payment Procedures”, Proceedings of the ISMIS 2002, (2002), 1-13. |
Linder, J. C, et al., “Bank Mergers: Integration and Profitability”, Journal of Finanical Services Research, (1992), 35-55. |
Little, Arthur D, “Making M-Payments a Reality”, Arthur D. Little Global M-Payment Report 2004, http://www.adlittle.de/downloads/artikel/MPayment—press%20release—English—Final.pdf, (2004), 1-5. |
McKitterick, David, “State of the Art Review of Mobile Payment Technology”, Trinity College Dublin—Computer Science Department, Technical Reports, (Jun. 13, 2003), 1-22. |
Mobile Tech News, “Ringtones made available using packaging ‘short codes’”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.mobiletechnews.com/info/2004/07/09/005946.html> (Observed Feb. 2, 2005), (Jul. 9, 2004), 27 pages. |
Ondrus, Jan, et al., “A Disruption Analysis in the Mobile Payment Market”, 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05), (Jan. 3-6, 2005), 1-10. |
Ondrus, Jan, “Mobile Payments: A Tool Kit for a Better Understanding of the Market”, License Thesis—University of Lausanne, (Jul. 2003), 1-38. |
Panis, Stathis, et al., “Mobile Commerce Service Scenarios and Related Business Models”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mobile Business, (Jul. 8-9, 2002), 10 Pages. |
Peirce, Michael, “Multi-Party Electronic Payments for Mobile Communications”, A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Department of Computer Science, (Oct. 31, 2000), 1-219. |
PR Newswire, “U.S. Cellular Introduces Web Browser for Cell Phones”, Copyright © 1996-2003 PR Newswire Association LLC., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://prnewsire.com/computer-electronics/20041116/CGTU07616112004-1.html>, (Accessed Feb. 4, 2005), 2 pages. |
Rodgers, Zachary, “SMS Short Codes come Alive on TV”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20030410191431/http://www.instantmessagingplanet.com/wireless/article.php/2118811> (Archived Apr. 10, 2003), (Mar. 19. 2003), 5 pages. |
Rodgers, Zachary, “U.S. Wireiss Carriers Debut Universal Short Codes”, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.instantmessagingplanet.com/wireless/article.php/3098231> (Observed Feb. 2, 2005), (Oct. 23, 2003), 4 pages. |
Varshney, Upkar, “A Framework for the Emerging Mobile Commerce Applications”, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences—2001, (2001), 1-10. |
Whois Source, “Common Short Code—CSC”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.whois.sc/common-short-code/> (Observed Feb. 2, 2005), (Copyright 1998-2005), 2 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Response filed Feb. 28, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2007”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/946,710, Response filed Oct. 18, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2006”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/947,459, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/947,459, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/947,459, Response filed Mar. 18, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 5, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,704 Response filed Mar. 24, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,704, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2009”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,704, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,720, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2009”, 20 Pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,720, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2008”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,720, Response filed Mar. 20, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/110, 944, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 20, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/207,383, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/347,934, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“USAA youth banking”, Tools to teach your child financial responsibility, https://www.usaa.com/inet/ent—utils/McStaticPages?key=bank—youth, 1 pg. |
CNN Money, “Start Your Kids Saving Early”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://money.ccn.com/1999/10/26/banking/q—kidsbank/, (Oct. 26, 1999), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,189, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,189, Response filed Apr. 4, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,189, Response filed Nov. 19, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/633,962, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed May 5, 2006”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,223, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2012 ”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Response filed Oct. 5, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,189, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2012”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/752,976, Response filed Jun. 3, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090327128 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12025223 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 12554785 | US | |
Parent | 09633962 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 12025223 | US |