U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/131,008, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENSURING SECURITY WITH MULTIPLE AUTHENTICATION SCHEMES”, Ser. No. 10/131,634, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURABLE BINDING OF ACCESS CONTROL LISTS IN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”, and Ser. No. 10/131,659, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREMENTAL REFRESH OF A COMPILED ACCESS CONTROL TABLE IN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM” filed concurrently herewith are assigned to the same assignee hereof and contain subject matter related, in certain respect, to the subject matter of the present application. The above-identified patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Technical Field of the Invention
This invention relates a system and method for managing a database. More particularly, it relates to a system and method for managing application specific privileges in a content management system.
2. Background Art
IBM Content Manager Version 7 (CM V7) provides a limited support for application specific privileges. Its design allows up to 99 bits in a 400-bit privilege string for applications. With 99 bits for application specific privileges, it is difficult to accommodate the growing needs for security control of sophisticated business applications. This deficiency reduces the expandability of the security model of CM V7.
CM V7 uses a 50-byte fixed vector to store 400 privilege bits. The last 99 bits are reserved for application specific privileges. The fixed vector causes the deficiency of adding additional application specific privileges into the system.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved system and method for managing application specific privileges.
System and method for managing privileges by storing system defined and user defined privilege definition codes in a database table, with a first plurality of the codes reserved to system defined privilege definition codes, and codes beyond the first plurality reserved to user defined privilege definition codes; and executing a database stored procedure selectively for adding, updating and deleting a user defined privilege.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, there is provided a computer program product configured to be operable to manage application specific privileges in a content management system.
Other features and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, a system and method is provided for managing application specific privileges in a content management system.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
User table 16 columns include user ID 130, user kind 140, user privilege set code 142, grant privilege set code 146, default ACL code 148, password 156, and user name 152. User ID 130 is the ID of the individual user or group. For an individual user 141, user ID 130 should match his DBMS user ID. The CM 20 uses this value for user authentication and access control. For a group 141, user ID 130 contains the group name. User kind 140 indicates whether this entry 141 represents an individual user or a group. User privilege set code 142 denotes the user privileges for this user 141. The privilege set 158 must be defined first, and this value is not valid for groups. It is set to 1 by CM system 20 for groups. User privilege set code 142 may be updated. Grant privilege set code 146 is the code assigned to new users 141 by a user 141 who is authorized to create users but not grant privileges to the new users. This value 146 is not valid for groups, and it can be updated. A system administrator GUI for creating a user 141 must have an entry field for that user's grant privilege set code 146. Default ACL code 148 is used to associate with items 42 when the access control 104 is configured at item level if this user 141 does not provide an ACL code when he creates items 42. Password 156 is the encrypted user password. User name 152 is the full name of this user or group 141.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Managing Application Specific Privileges
User refers to a registered CM 20 user that can obtain CM services. A user-defined privilege is a CM user-defined application-specific privilege. A user ID is a unique name for a CM user and is used for runtime authentication and access control. User Privileges are a number of privileges granted to each CM User, stored in user's profile. User privileges define the maximum operations a user can perform. A user's effective access rights will never exceed his user privileges.
A Privilege represents an ability to use the CM system. Privileges are be grouped into privilege sets 158 before they can be used. Privilege definition code 150 is a CM system generated unique identifier for each CM Privilege 158. A privilege set 158 is a named group of privileges and is used for both defining ACLs and granting privileges to users. A Privilege set code 154 is a CM-system-generated unique identifier for each CM privilege set. User privileges granting and ACL defining are carried out using this code. A system defined privilege 34, 36 is a CM-system-defined privilege definition. System entities are CM system 20 management entities which can be system tables, views, indexes and stored procedures. A system entity has no ACL 44 associated with it and access to system entities is authorized only by user privileges 32.
Privileges table 32 is used to store system and user defined privileges. A privilege is represented by a row in the table. A new privilege can be added into table 32 by inserting a new row for the privilege. A privilege can be removed by deleting the corresponding row from table 32. Each privilege has a unique privilege code 150. Codes 0 to 999 are reserved to store CM system-defined privileges 36, 38. 1000 and up are open for user-defined privileges 38. Application specific privileges 38 can be added without limit.
A privilege is an ability to use CM system 20, a function of which is to manage and control access to system and user defined objects, or data items. An item is an atomic user data entity stored in the CM library server. An item type is a schema definition for a collection of items and is also used to represent all items that conform to the same schema definition. For example, as is represented by line 70, the ability to search CM items 40 is ItemQuery, and the ability to delete CM items is ItemDelete. CM Privileges 34, 36, 38 are used to grant access to data items 42 to individual users and to define ACLs 44. An access control list (ACL) 44 is a set of one or more access control rules used to control access to CM controlled entities 40. A rule specifies who (users/groups/public) can perform what functions (ACL privileges) 32. A group is a number of zero or more users and is used only for defining ACLs, not for granting privileges. ACL privileges are operations specified in an ACL rule that are allowed to be applied on a bound controlled entity 40 by the ACL-specified users. A Controlled entity 40 is a unit of protected user data 42, and can be an item, an item type or the entire library. Library refers to the entire collection of user data 42 stored in the CM system. A controlled entity 40 must be bound to an ACL 44. Access to a Controlled Entity 40 is authorized by both user privileges 32 and ACL 44. An ACL rule for group is an ACL rule that is pertinent to a group. An ACL rule for public is an ACL rule that is pertinent to all users. An ACL rule for user is an ACL rule that is pertinent to an individual user. Rules with the same ACL code 134 form an ACL 44. An ACL code 134 is a CM system 20 generated unique identifier for an ACL 44. The CM controlled entity 40 ACL 44 binding is carried out using this code 134. As is represented by line 58, CM privileges 34, 36, 38 are grouped into privilege sets 48 before they are used. As is represented by line 62, data access privileges 36 control access to user data items 42 via access control lists 44 or directly by a SQL interface in database server 22 without checking access control list 44.
CM system 20 provides a number of un-modifiable pre-defined privileges, called system-defined privileges 34, 36. Each of these privileges authorizes a certain operation(s). As is represented by line 64, system-defined privileges 34, 36 are enforced by CM library server 20 stored procedures 46.
CM system 20 also allows users to define their application-specific privileges, called user-defined privileges 38. As is represented by line 56, user-defined privileges 38 are enforced by user application 24 through user exits 26.
Each privilege 32 has a system-generated unique privilege Definition Code 150. Privilege Definition Codes 150 from 0 to 999 are reserved to store CM system-defined privileges 34, 36. Codes 150 from 1000 and up are open for User-defined Privileges 38. All the privilege definitions including user-defined privileges 38 are stored in the CM system table ICMSTPrivDefs 32.
CM System Administration Privileges
CM System Administration Privileges 34 contain the rights to model user data and administer and maintain the CM system 20. This category does not include any access rights to the user data 42. The CM system 20 management tasks may include:
SystemAdmin—The CM system administration privilege. It conveys the right to manage the system. It is the highest CM System 20 Administration Privilege 34 and allows user to perform all management tasks (aka functions). In an exemplary embodiment, a user with this privilege requires DB2 DBADM authority.
SystemQuery—The privilege to query CM system information.
SystemDefineUser—The privilege to create and update, but not delete CM users.
SystemQueryUserPriv—The privilege to query other user's User Privileges 32.
SystemGrantUserPriv—The privilege to grant other user's User Privileges 32.
SystemDefineItemType—The privilege to query, create, update and delete Item 42 Types and Attributes. In an exemplary embodiment, a user with this privilege requires one of the following DB2 authority lists: DBADM or database CREATETAB, BINDADD, schema CREATEIN, ALTERIN, DROPIN.
Data Access Privileges
Data access privileges 36 specify rights to access and modify the CM Controlled Entities 40. Entities 40 include documents, files, folders, etc. Access to Controlled Entities 40, in addition to access control list (ACL) 44 check, is controlled by this category of privileges 36.
The following is an exemplary list of data access privileges 36.
ItemSuperAccess—This super access privilege allows bypassing ACL 44 check and therefore enables the privileged operation to be applied to all data 42. It is designed mainly for defining super users so that they can perform any operations on any system data and user data 42.
ItemSQLSelect—The privilege to select items 40 using SQL interface 28.
ItemTypeQuery—The privilege to query item type and attribute definitions.
ItemQuery—The privilege to query items 40.
ItemAdd—The privilege to create items 40.
ItemSetUserAttr—The privilege to update an item's user-defined attribute values (implicit checkout/checkin).
ItemSetSysAttr—The privilege to update an item's 40 system-defined attribute values (implicit checkout/checkin).
ItemDelete—The privilege to delete items 40 (implicitly checks whether item has been checked out).
ItemMove—The privilege to move items 42 between item Types.
ItemLinkTo—The privilege to heterogeneously link items 42 to other items.
ItemLinked—The privilege to set items 42 to be heterogeneously linked by other items.
ItemOwn—The privilege to set items 42 to own a collection of Items.
ItemOwned—The privilege to set items 42 to be owned by other Items.
ItemAddLink—The privilege to create a link or a set of links between two items 42.
ItemChangeLink—The privilege to modify previously defined links between items.
ItemRemoveLink—The privilege to delete previously defined links between items.
ItemCheckOut—The privilege to check out an item 42. This implies the privilege to check in items as well.
In connection with
Privilege Definition Table
Privilege definition table 32 maintains the unlimited number of CM privilege definitions, including both CM system defined privileges 34, 36 and user-defined privileges 38. None of the system defined privileges can be modified. Each privilege has a system-generated unique code 150. Codes 0 to 999 are reserved to store CM System-defined Privileges 34, 36. Codes beyond 999, that is, 1000 and up, (or, conceivably, 0 and down) are open for user-defined privileges 38. When defining or updating privilege sets 48, this table 32 can be first queried to list all defined privileges. As is represented by line 56, applications 24 can also query this table 32 at runtime to get the definitions of the connected user's 10 privileges and customize the application 24 menu selections specifically suitable for that user 10.
Table VII shows the definitions of CM system-defined privileges 34, 36 in the privilege definition table 32. Each row contains a privilege definition code (PrivDefCode) 150, a privilege definition name (PivDefName) 74, and the description (PrivDefDesc) 76.
Referring to
Referring to
In step 80, users and user groups entitled to use content manager system 20 and the database 30 which it manages are defined by the system administrator.
In step 82, system defined privileges 34, 36 are initialized by the system administrator.
In step 84, user defined privileges 38 have been previously initialized or defined.
In step 86, user defined privileges 38 and system defined privileges 34, 36 are collected into privilege sets.
In step 88, user data objects 42 and access control lists 44 on those objects 42 have been created.
In step 90, content manager system 20 receives a request from a user at client workstation 10 to access a specific user data item 42 for a specific purpose.
In step 92, manager 20 determines if the request is from a user entitled from step 80 to access system 20 and database 30. If not, in step 98 access is denied. If so, then in step 94 the privilege set 48 for this user is accessed to determine if the user is privileged to access data item 42 for the specific purpose identified in step 90. If not, in step 98 access is denied. If so, then in step 96 the access control list 44 for the specific user data item 42 is checked to determine if this user is entitled to access. If not, in step 98 access is denied. If so, in step 100 access is granted according to the privileges of privileges set 48, to read, delete, or update.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, an access control model is implemented by which one or more rules, associated with a controlled entity, authorizes user operation(s) on the bound entity, i.e., specifies who (users/groups/public) can perform what functions (ACL Privileges) on the controlled entity. An ACL only defines the authorization of the bound entities and does not circumvent the User Privileges. Thus, as is depicted in
Advantages Over the Prior Art
It is an advantage of the invention that there is provided an improved system and method for managing application specific privileges.
It is a further advantage of the invention that there is provided a system and method for managing application specific privileges at the server side of a client/server system.
It is a further advantage of the invention that there is provided a system and method for defining an unlimited number of application specific privileges.
It will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, it is within the scope of the invention to provide a computer program product or program element, or a program storage or memory device such as a solid or fluid transmission medium, magnetic or optical wire, tape or disc, or the like, for storing signals readable by a machine, for controlling the operation of a computer according to the method of the invention and/or to structure its components in accordance with the system of the invention.
Further, each step of the method may be executed on any general computer, such as IBM Systems designated as zSeries, iSeries, xSeries, and pSeries, or the like and pursuant to one or more, or a part of one or more, program elements, modules or objects generated from any programming language, such as C++, Java, PI/1, Fortran or the like. And still further, each said step, or a file or object or the like implementing each said step, may be executed by special purpose hardware or a circuit module designed for that purpose.
Accordingly, the scope of protection of this invention is limited only by the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/131,651 filed Apr. 23, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,023 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING APPLICATION SPECIFIC PRIVILEGES IN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5390312 | Chiarot et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5495533 | Linehan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504892 | Atsatt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5552776 | Wade et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560005 | Hoover et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5627987 | Nozue et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649099 | Theimer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5701458 | Bsaibes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5758153 | Atsatt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774668 | Choquier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778222 | Herrick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5941947 | Brown et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014666 | Helland et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052785 | Lin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6105027 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6141754 | Choy | Oct 2000 | A |
6161139 | Win et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195705 | Leung | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6256715 | Hansen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308173 | Glasser et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6438549 | Aldred et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460141 | Olden | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460171 | Couvert et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470353 | Yaung et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523027 | Underwood | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6581060 | Choy | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6609128 | Underwood | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633878 | Underwood | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6718535 | Underwood | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6772350 | Belani et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6823338 | Byrne et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823452 | Doyle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6976023 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7016907 | Boreham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7272550 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284265 | Choy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308580 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20010037379 | Livnat | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002577 | Garg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030200466 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9940502 | Aug 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050262551 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10131651 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 11182148 | US |