System and method for managing load distribution across a power grid

Abstract

A method for scheduling a charge of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) includes receiving, by a load management system, PEV information from a PEV plugged into an electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE); transformer information from a transformer management system, the transformer information relating to a transformer associated with the EVSE; determining, by the charging information based on the PEV information and transformer information; providing the charging information to the PEV.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to managing a load of one or more transformers in an electricity transporting grid to enable controlled growth of charging plug-in electric vehicles demands beyond a reserved load of supported homes.

BACKGROUND

Pollution-related concerns, coupled with high gasoline prices, increased political tension with the worlds' largest petroleum suppliers, and increasing government support have lead to increased demand for electric vehicles. It is estimated that 10 to 12 carmakers are ready to launch plug-in models by 2015, and the electric vehicle market is expected to grow to over 2.5 million cars by the same year. Such electric vehicles include, for example, plug-in electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (collectively, “PEVs”).

Unfortunately, as the number of PEVs on the road continues to increase, the risk of overloading local distribution transformers also increases. As shown in Table 1, below, recharging a single PEV may consume up to three times as much electricity as a typical home. Accordingly, overloading problems may arise when several PEVs in the same neighborhood recharge at the same time, or during the normal summer peak loads.

TABLE 1
CHARGING TYPES	LEVEL 1	LEVEL 2	LEVEL 3
VOLTAGE	120 VAC,	240 VAC,	Up to 600 VDC
	Single Phase	Single Phase
ELECTRIC LOAD	2 KW	8 KW	150 KW
CHARGING TIME	8-16 Hours	4-8 Hours	10-50 Minutes

FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified view of a basic electricity transporting grid including a power plant for generating electricity 105, a step-up transformer for stepping up voltage for transmission 110, transmission lines for carrying electricity 115, a neighborhood or substation transformer 120 for a first step down, a distribution line 125 for carrying electricity to customer premises and, finally, distribution transformers 130 for a second step down in voltage for in-premise use. In the illustrated two-tier step-down transformer configuration, the substation transformers 120 manage the load of distribution transformers 130. At each tier there is a risk of overloading (regional or local) if the dynamic behavior is not well monitored.

As shown, a distribution transformer 130 reduces the primary voltage of the electric distribution system to a utilization voltage serving customers in homes and businesses. Generally, a distribution transformer 130 may be a static device constructed with two or more windings used to transfer alternating current electric power by electromagnetic induction from one circuit to another at the same frequency but with different values of voltage and current. Distribution transformers 130 are often deployed in clusters (e.g., 3) to serve a block of homes. For example, a typical 25 kVA distribution transformer 130 serves approximately 10 homes, while a substation transformer 120 can carry 1000 s of kVA.

If one or more homes mapped to a particular distribution transformer 130 adds a particularly large load, such as a PEV, this may increase the risk of overloading the mapped distribution transformer. Further, even if a single distribution transformer 130 could handle the increased load, if a number of the distribution transformers mapped to a substation transformer 120 take on increased loads due to PEVs (or other electricity-requiring apparatuses), the cumulative effect could overload the mapped substation transformer. Accordingly, the load demands of the emerging PEV market are expected to affect the performance of the power grid on multiple levels, including the local level. This is exacerbated by the fact that transformers are typically in varied stages of useful life, with some approaching their capacity loading with the existing growth.

PEVs represent a major addition in load on a transformer. By way of example, FIG. 2 illustrates the projected impact of adding three PEVs to a single distribution transformer, where each PEV draws the equivalent of one-third the amount of power as a single home. As discussed above (see Table 1) the demand of a single PEV may be as high as about three times the load of a single home.

FIG. 2 illustrates the standard (expected) load shape L1 for a warm summer day for 8-12 smaller, older homes per 25 kVA circuit; the expected load L2 with the addition of three PEVs each at 1.4 kW charging requirement; and the expected load L3 at 3.3 kW charging requirement. As shown, even without the additional demands of the PEVs, the demand already reaches peak capacity of the transformer in the evening, when people are home from work with air conditioners and other loads using the system (see L2).

Impacts of overloading transformers in the distribution system may include: phase imbalance, power quality issues, transformer degradation and failure, as well as circuit breaker and fuse blowout as described in Ryan Liu, et al, A Survey of PEV Impacts on Electric Utilities, IEEE PES conference Jan. 17, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A presentation by Hawk Asgeirsson, P.E. of DTE Energy titled, DTE Energy DER Technology Adoption DEW analysis of Renewable, PEV & Storage, presented at the Utility/Lab Workshop on PV Technology and Systems Nov. 8-9, 2010 in Tempe Ariz. is incorporated herein by reference and provides additional background and details regarding the PEV charging challenges and limitations that the invention described herein will help to overcome.

One obvious solution that is used and contemplated in the face of increasing load demand is the replacement or upgrading of transformers to meet new and expected demand. However, mass replacements are expensive and could be prohibitively so in the case of expected PEV strain. Further, such replacements/upgrades would be wasteful in many cases, where current transformers were or would have been sufficient to meet demand. Further still, replacement/upgrades may be insufficient to meet booming demand.

Ideally, the ability to monitor and track transformer load could help facilitate targeted replacement. U.S. Pat. No. 6,711,512, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes a system for measuring, in real time, a variety of load parameters (e.g., phase voltages, phase currents and temperatures—See Table 2 below) of a pole transformer placed on a distribution line and transferring measurements wirelessly to a central monitoring station. This system requires the addition of a sensor at the transformer. Accordingly, the transformer load data could be used to determine, based on historical load information, where a transformer (or possibly other grid equipment) might need to be upgraded or added to accommodate historical loads. However, this would not mitigate immediate transformer load concerns.

	TABLE 2
	Communication
	Units	Alarm	Local	Remote
Transformer Parameters
Tank pressure	psi	Y	Y	Y
Tank vacuum	psi	Y	Y	Y
Oil temperature	°	Y	Y	Y
Winding temperature	°	Y	Y	Y
Pressure relief device operation	on/off	Y	Y	Y
Sudden pressure relay operation	on/off	Y	Y	Y
Liquid level	on/off	Y	Y	Y
Hydrogen gas %	%	N	N	Y
Water content in oil	%	N	N	Y
System Parameters
Fans on	on/off	Y	Y	Y
Loss of control power	on/off	Y	Y	Y
Ambient temperature	°			Y
Input current	amps	N	N	Y
Input voltage	volts	N	N	Y
Output current	amps	N	N	Y
Output voltage	volts	N	N	Y

With respect to PEV loads in particular, a contemplated solution for meeting increased demand is to request that home owners notify their utility of every new PEV purchase, so that the utility can (statically) retrofit the available transformer capacity over time in order to plan for peak demands. However this may not always be easy to manage, and does not consider the scenario of charging away from home. Further, load limitations discussed above may be localized to a (static) transformer and may be difficult to manage from an ultimate utility head-end without visibility to the instantaneous/accumulated load per transformer.

Accordingly, there is a need in the art for systems and methods for stabilizing a power grid to accommodate simultaneous charging of PEVs to prevent uncontrollable load on transformers. The system should be able to handle PEV charging demands that are expected to vary spatially (depending on market penetration, system configuration and socio-economics), and temporally (depending on driving patterns, battery sizes and charging connection types—see Table 1, above). Further, the system should be able to handle PEV charging impacts due to clustering (simultaneous charging at homes located on a single distribution transformer). Further still, there is a need for methods and systems that can accommodate several PEV charging scenarios, including scenarios where a PEV plugs in for an immediate charge; others where, after negotiation, a PEV may charge at a future time (e.g., hours later when rates are more affordable) at a negotiated charging rate; and still others which allow PEVs to roam between charging stations (e.g., occasionally charge away from home) and be billed to the owner's account independent of the charging location.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The present application hereby references and incorporates by reference each of the following United States patent applications in their entirety:

• • Ser. No. 12/275,236 entitled “Point-to-Point Communication Within a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0004-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,305 entitled “Transport Layer and Model For an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0003-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,237 entitled “System and Method For Application Layer Time

Synchronization Without Creating a Time Discrepancy or Gap in Time,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0006-US);

• • Ser. No. 12/275,238 entitled “Communication and Message Route Optimization and Messaging in a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0007-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,242 entitled “Collector Device and System Utilizing Standardized Utility Metering Protocol,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0009-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,251 entitled “Power-Conserving Network Device For Advanced Metering Infrastructure,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0018-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,252 entitled “Method and System For Creating and Managing Association and Balancing of a Mesh Device in a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0020);
  • Ser. No. 12/275,257 entitled “System and Method for Operating Mesh Devices in Multi-Tree Overlapping Mesh Networks,” filed Nov. 21, 2008 (TR0038-US);
  • Ser. No. 12/554,135 entitled “System and Method for Implementing Mesh Network Communications using a Mesh Network Protocol,” filed Sep. 4, 2009; and
  • Ser. No. 12/721,948 entitled “Process, Device and System for Mapping Transformers to Meters and Locating Non-technical Line Losses,” filed Mar. 11, 2010 (TR0063).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention provide methods and systems for stabilizing a power grid to accommodate simultaneous charging of PEVs to prevent uncontrollable load on transformers (e.g., distribution transformers and/or substation transformers). In certain embodiments, a system may allow for PEV charging demands that vary both spatially and temporally. The system may prevent damage to an electrical grid due to PEV clustering and/or may accommodate several PEV charging scenarios, including scenarios where: (1) a PEV plugs in for an immediate charge; (2) a PEV charges at a future time at a negotiated charging rate; and (3) a PEV roams between charging stations. The system may allow away-from-home charging to be billed to the PEV owner's account independent of the charging location.

In one aspect of the invention a method for scheduling a charge of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) is provided. The method may include receiving, by a load management system, PEV information from a PEV plugged into an electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE). The method also includes receiving, by the load management system, transformer information from a transformer management system, the transformer information relating to a transformer associated with the EVSE. Once the PEV information and transformer information are received, the load management system may determine charging information based on this information. The charging information may then be provided to the PEV, for example, via the EVSE.

In another aspect of the invention, a system for scheduling a charge of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) is provided. The system may include a smart meter network having one or more field nodes, such as but not limited to meters and/or transformer agents. The system may also include a load management system in communication with the smart meter network. A transformer management system may also be included. The transformer management system may be in communication with the load management system, the smart meter network and a distribution transformer. Moreover, an electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) may also be in communication with the load meter system and the transformer management system via the smart meter network. The load management system may receive PEV information from a PEV plugged into the EVSE and may also receive transformer information relating to the distribution transformer from the transformer management system. The load management system may then determine charging information based on the PEV information and transformer information and may provide the charging information to the PEV such that it may be charged by the EVSE.

These and other aspects of the invention will be better understood by reading the following detailed description and appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The following figures are exemplary of the aspects of the embodiments described herein and are intended to be considered in conjunction with the descriptions herein:

FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic of existing power grid infrastructure for use with the embodiments of the stabilization systems and methods described herein;

FIG. 2 is an exemplary load graph for a 25 kVA transformer under expected conditions;

FIGS. 3 a and 3b are exemplary smart grid network schematics for use with and including features of the embodiments described herein; and

FIG. 4 is an exemplary PEV charging scenario in accordance with the embodiments described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments and examples presented herein describe systems and methods for preventing power transformer and/or electrical system overloads via admission control mechanisms. The systems and methods described herein may prevent a transformer's load from exceeding a predetermined load threshold. Scheduling PEV charging events by considering instantaneous and/or historical load state of an associated transformer may minimize the risk of the transformer exceeding its peak capacity. Moreover, controlled charging may also help minimize accelerated aging of a transformer. It will be appreciated that, although embodiments specifically refer to admission control of PEV charging scenarios, the invention is not necessarily limited as such, and any embodiment may be generalized to one or more electrical devices requiring electrical load.

Referring to FIGS. 3a and 3b, different actors and interactions involved with PEV charging as part of a smart grid system (e.g., Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)) are illustrated. Smart grid systems typically measure, collect and analyze utility usage information from advanced devices (e.g., electricity meters) through a network, such as but not limited to a smart meter network, on request or on a pre-defined schedule. The illustrated infrastructure includes hardware, software, communications, customer associated systems and meter data management software. The infrastructure may collect and distribute information to customers, suppliers, utility companies and/or service providers. Additional features of smart grid and smart meter systems are described below and in the documents incorporated herein by reference.

Referring to FIG. 3a, an exemplary stabilization system may comprise one or more of a Transformer Management System (“TMS”) 310, a Load Management System (“LMS”) 315, an AMI Head End server 305, a Meter Data Management System (“MDMS”) 320, Electronic Vehicle Supply Equipment (“EVSE”) 330, and a Demand Side Management (“DSM”) application 325. As shown, a PEV 340 plugs in (e.g., via the EVSE 330) and communicates with a scheduling application within the LMS 315, e.g., via a smart meter mesh network, or via the Internet. Based on PEV information (e.g., account information, charging plan, EVSE type, preferred charge time, charge rate, etc.), the scheduling application may determine charging information, such as but not limited to, start time, end time, charge duration, and/or a charge rate. The charging information be determined based on a range of variables, including the overall demand, cost of energy, and/or the service tier of the account that the PEV is associated with. The determined charging information may be communicated back to the PEV, and charging may begin at the start time with a settlement to follow upon charging completion.

As shown, a head end server 305 may be a computing device configured to receive information, such as meter readings from one or more meters in a smart meter system. The head end 305 may be configured to transmit instructions to, for example, the TMS, LMS, MDMS, and/or DSM, as desired or required. The head end 305 may be a central processing system including one or more computing systems (i.e., one or more server computers). Where the head end includes more than one computing system, the computing systems can be connected by one or more networks.

The PEV 340 is plugged into the EVSE 330 to receive power via the EVSE from a distribution transformer 335. The EVSE may be located at a PEV owner's home, or may be located at a dedicated charging station (e.g., a gas station). In order to receive power, the PEV may attempt to communicate with a scheduling application within an LMS 315, e.g., via a smart meter network, or via the internet. As discussed in detail below, a PEV charging scheduling program may determine the time and duration during which the PEV will be charged. PEV charging scheduling may take into consideration overall load objectives, dynamic or static consumer energy usage, as well as additional local transformer load states and other parameters that describe how well the transformer would be able to carry the intended load (See Table 2 above).

In one embodiment, a TMS 310 may be responsible for monitoring and/or tracking transformer information of one or more distribution transformers 335. The TMS 310 may provide such transformer information to, for example, an LMS 315, and the LMS may interact with a PEV (e.g., via EVSE 330) to negotiate charging schedules, charging events, as well as billing/settlements.

The TMS may be provisioned with transformer information for each monitored transformer. Such transformer information may comprise, for example, vender/model ID, type of transformer, design capacity, maximum/minimum input voltage parameters, maximum/minimum output voltage parameters, power capacity, duty, frequency range, voltage class, cooling type, magnetic form, constant-potential transformer descriptor, three phase winding configuration, system characteristics (e.g., ungrounded, solidly grounded, high or low resistance grounded, etc.), and efficiency (e.g., excitation, impedance & total losses, resistance, reactance & impedance drop, regulation). Additional information about a transformers condition (e.g., its health) could also be included in this assessment where this information is available, e.g., where the transformer has a health monitoring device. (See Table 2 above).

The transformer information will typically include charge point location information relating to each of the charge point locations serviced by the transformer. The TMS may use this information to track the load of each transformer based on its knowledge of PEV charging events local to the transformers.

In certain embodiments, the TMS may monitor current and/or scheduled charging events at each charge point. For example, the TMS may query the LMS to discover charging schedules and may update a master list or schedule of charging events based on received information. Using the information received from the LMS, and the stored transformer information, the TMS may calculate transformer utilization and/or remaining capacity for a given transformer. Such information (e.g., remaining capacity at a given time, or the number of kW that can be accommodated at a certain time/duration) may be passed on to the LMS upon request, or at predetermined intervals such that the LMS may continue to schedule charging events at optimized times.

In one embodiment, the LMS may query the TMS in order to decide whether, or how, a requested charge event can be supported. For example, when a transformer is close to its design capacity at the targeted charge time, the LMS may propose a different time, charge rate, or deny a request altogether.

The TMS may learn about transformer load states in different ways. For example, each time the LMS schedules a new charging event, this information may be made available (e.g., via a push or periodic pull) to the TMS, which keeps track of the current and expected future load and the utilization of each transformer (i.e., via a calendar). In this example, information may also be provided when PEV charging starts and/or ends.

This embodiment describes centralized logic at the LMS for collecting and processing transformer information. Although the TMS and LMS are shown separately, the systems can be integrated. As another example, distributed agents (e.g., embedded in smart meter network nodes—discussed below) can be used to learn about individual PEV charging situations via a smart meter network, and may communicate this information to a centralized TMS, which deduces each transformer load state accordingly. The LMS could alternatively communicate directly with the agents instead of the centralized TMS.

The DSM application 325 may interact with devices in/around the home (including the PEV while charging) in order to achieve energy savings based on a set of message interactions (i.e., price, load control signals, and/or text messages). In certain embodiments, the DSM application 325 may provide consumers with information relating to price of energy at a particular time. In other embodiments, the DSM application 325 may automatically control energy using devices at a user's place of residence or business.

The MDMS 320 may be in communication with the head end server 305 and may be employed for long term data storage and management for the vast quantities of data that may be delivered from meters (FIG. 3b at 345), PEVs 340, and/or other smart devices located in a user's residence or business. Such data typically includes usage data and/or events imported from the head end server 305. Exemplary events include, a charge start, charge end, or a situation where the charging of PEV is interrupted (e.g., as part of a load shedding campaign).

Referring to FIG. 3b, an exemplary system is illustrated where the collection and processing logic are de-centralized. As shown, the system comprises a smart grid network, which includes a number of interconnected field nodes (shown as “n”) 345. The field nodes 345 may include such equipment as meters and/or mesh gates, and may be operable to communicate information to/from the TMS and/or LMS. Generally, field nodes 345 in the form of meters may include utility sensors and may communicate with a mesh gates over a smart meter network. For example, a meter in the smart meter system may monitor utilities usage, such as electricity usage and usage patterns.

A field node 345 in the form of a mesh gate may be in communication with any number of meters, and may aggregate information from such meters to be transmitted to a head-end sever over a wide area network (WAN). A WAN may be a communication medium capable of transmitting digital information, for example, the Internet, a cellular network, a private network, a phone line configured to carry a dial-up connection, or any other network. Descriptions of exemplary mesh networks, including electric meters, can be found in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/275,252 titled, “Method and System for Creating and Managing Association and Balancing of a Mesh Device in a Mesh Network,” filed Nov. 21, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In certain embodiments, field nodes 345 may be embedded with software and/or hardware based transformer agents (TA) 350 for collecting transformer data and passing it to the LMS and/or TMS. Accordingly, the TAs 350 may communicate with the TMS or may communicate directly with the LMS. In one embodiment, the TMS 310 and/or LMS 315 may be configured to receive information, such as meter readings, from a plurality of TAs 350. The TMS and/or LMS may also be configured to transmit instructions to the TAs. Such TA's may be manufactured or retrofitted with communications modules in order to host agents.

Active TAs 350 associated with a transformer 335 can also be used for real time or near real time system monitoring functions (i.e., network management) that add to the visibility of a smart grid's state. Additionally, load history may be used to predict transformer life expectations for asset management purposes

In one embodiment, the TAs 350 may “snoop” on communications between a PEV 340 and the LMS 315 to inform the TMS 310 of selected relevant messages. In this case the TMS may need to derive the essential transformer information, filter out duplicate messages, and fill the gaps where needed to construct a charging schedule.

Alternatively, TAs 350 may serve as proxies to the LMS. In this case the PEVs may communicate directly with their regional proxies to determine capacity (regardless of the account status of the requester). Each proxy can locally assess the associated transformers capacity (through its admission control functions) and may decide whether a charging request is feasible, before forwarding it to the LMS. The proxy LMS thus makes local decision (e.g., given known information, whether the transformer can carry the charging request) and the centralized LMS may make global decisions (e.g., whether the charge is acceptable versus regional conditions and user account status).

In either scenario, no changes to the (passive) distribution transformers are required to allow monitoring of their load state, as transformer information is derived from other points in the network. However, whenever transformers are capable of providing their own load and/or health status as discussed herein, this transformer information may also be integrated into the system.

In one embodiment, the TAs 350 may be able to schedule events locally and autonomously (including when there is a communications failure upstream, eliminating a single point of failure problem). In some cases the LMS may comprise or consist essentially of any number of distributed TAs.

When TAs 350 are embedded in a mesh gate of a smart meter network, they may not always have visibility to the same set of charging locations or transformers if the network topology changes (e.g., nodes may re-associate with a different mesh gate and communication may not be possible). This situation requires an additional level of coordination (e.g., via the TMS) to make sure that required data is available at the different agents in order to avoid any gaps. Such coordination may be provided by exemplary systems.

In addition to facilitating the load distribution and negotiations described above with respect to PEV charge scheduling, aggregated transformer load information may be employed in a variety of applications. For example, such information may be used to recommend other charging locations that may be better suited for charging at a specific time, either derived in real time or via statistical trending. Such information may be passed through the smart grid network through the EVSE and to the PEV.

As another example, such information may be used in location-based applications and/or social networks to make recommendations and/or offer incentives to defer charging. Similarly, such information may be used to guide PEVs to other less loaded charging locations (e.g., follow a GPS-guided directions on a map for discounted charging nearby). These implementations may be programmed into the PEV itself or may be presented to a user in the form of a smart phone or GPS application.

In a separate embodiment, communications can occur out of band (i.e., not via the smart meter network), wherein PEVs can report their charging status via a separate network and this data is aggregated in a third party application. Such data may then be used by the LMS (e.g., through web services or manually).

Referring to FIG. 4, an exemplary scenario is illustrated, where a PEV plugs in (e.g., via the EVSE) and communicates with a scheduling application within the LMS, e.g., via the smart meter network, or via the internet. As shown, the PEV is initially plugged into the EVSE, and the connection is sensed by the EVSE causing it to wakeup. The PEV next sends PEV information (identification) to the LMS, and said PEV information is confirmed. Upon confirmation, the PEV sends an energy request to the LMS.

Upon receiving PEV information and an energy request, the LMS queries the TMS for transformer information, and determines charging information, such as but not limited to an optimal charging start time, charging end time, and/or charging duration based on the transformer information. The charging information may be sent to the TMS such that the transformer information may be updated.

Once the charging information is determined, it may be sent to the PEV and charging may occur according to the charging information. Upon completion of the charge, the energy sum may be determined and propagated through the system to the LMS and/or the TMS. Finally, the transformer information may be updated, and the PEV may be billed accordingly.

The embodiments described herein provide for tracking transformer load status with clear visibility of the load conditions of individual transformers. Accordingly, the LMS now has access to transformer load information and can include this in its decision to accept PEV charging requests; thus protecting the transformers and minimizing risk of down time. Charging decisions are made with better coordination and local awareness.

The automated system and processes described herein can be embodied in hardware, software and combinations of hardware and software elements to carry out one or more processes related to load management. The software embodiments and applications including transformer management, load management, demand side management, information collection and other application may include but are not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc. Furthermore, the components of the embodiments can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any tangible apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The medium can utilize electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium (though propagation mediums in and of themselves as signal carriers are not included in the definition of physical computer-readable medium). Examples of a physical computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk, and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.

A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code includes at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories that provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution. Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers. Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks, including various client-server configurations. Modems, cable modem, and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.

Moreover, the disclosed processes may be readily implemented in software, e.g., as a computer program product having one or more modules each adapted for one or more functions of the software, executed on a programmed general purpose computer, cellular telephone, PDA, a special purpose computer, a microprocessor, or the like. In these instances, the systems and methods of this invention can be implemented as a program embedded on a personal computer such as a JAVA®, CGI or Perl script, as a resource residing on a server or graphics workstation, as a routine embedded in a dedicated image system, or the like. The systems and methods of this invention can also be implemented by physically incorporating this system and method into a software and/or hardware system, such as the hardware and software systems of a computer. Such computer program products and systems can be distributed and employ a client-server architecture.

It is to be appreciated that the various components of the technology can be located at distant portions of a distributed network and/or the Internet, or within a dedicated secure, unsecured and/or encrypted system. Thus, it should be appreciated that the components of the system can be combined into one or more devices or co-located on a particular node of a distributed network, such as a telecommunications network. As will be appreciated from the description, and for reasons of computational efficiency, the components of the system can be arranged at any location within a distributed network without affecting the operation of the system. Moreover, the components could be embedded in a dedicated machine.

Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the various links connecting the elements can be wired or wireless links, or any combination thereof, or any other known or later developed element(s) that is capable of supplying and/or communicating data to and from the connected elements. The term module as used herein can refer to any known or later developed hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof that is capable of performing the functionality associated with that element. The terms determine, calculate and compute, and variations thereof, as used herein are used interchangeably and include any type of methodology, process, mathematical operation or technique.

The methods described herein may include in whole or part workflows. Such workflows may include inquiry and response steps carried out for example via a web-based interface, a spreadsheet, existing software applications, etc. Embodiments of the tool or solution may include workflows that automate the collection and use of information in various ways, e.g., inquiries and responses; polling individuals, entities or users; HTML interfaces; integration with spreadsheets or other applications; and integration with external systems. Such information once collected may be arranged in a desired framework.

While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted, described, and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for scheduling a charge of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) comprising: receiving, by a load management system, PEV information from a PEV plugged into an electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), the EVSE being associated with a given transformer of a plurality of transformers for charging one or more PEV;acquiring, by a meter network, load information from each of a plurality of meters in the meter network, where one or more of the plurality of meters is associated with the given transformer;determining, by a transformer management system, transformer information for said given transformer based on load information acquired by the one or more of the plurality of meters associated with the given transformer;receiving, by the load management system, the transformer information of the given transformer associated with the EVSE;determining, by the load management system, charging information based on the PEV information and transformer information; andproviding, by the load management system, the charging information to the PEV.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the PEV information comprises one or more of the group consisting of account information, charging plan, EVSE type, preferred charge time, power required, and charge rate.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the transformer information comprises one or more of the group consisting of vender/model ID, type of transformer, transformer capacity, maximum input voltage, minimum input voltage, duty, frequency range, voltage class, cooling type, magnetic form, and three phase winding configuration.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the charging information comprises one or more of the group consisting of charge start time, charge end time, charge duration, and charge rate.

5. A method according to claim 1, further comprising confirming, by the load management system, the PEV information.

6. A method according to claim 1, further comprising charging the PEV according to the charging information.

7. A method according to claim 1 further comprising: receiving, by the transformer management system, the PEV information; receiving, by the transformer management system, the charging information; and updating, by the transformer management system, the transformer information of the given transformer based on the charging information and PEV information.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein said load management system, said transformer management system, and said EVSE are in communication via a smart meter network.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein said smart meter network comprises one or more transformer agents, and said transformer information is determined by the one or more transformer agents.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the transformer agents provide meter readings to the transformer management system and/or the load management system.

11. A method according to claim 9, wherein the load management system comprises the transformer agents, and the transformer agents determine the charging information.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein said transformer agents are adapted to determine charging information locally and autonomously.

13. A system for scheduling a charge of a plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) comprising: a smart meter network comprising one or more transformer agents, where each of the one or more transformer agents acquire load information from a plurality of meters in the smart meter network, each meter being associated with a given distribution transformer of a plurality of distribution transformers;a load management system in communication with the smart meter network;a transformer management system in communication with the load management system and the smart meter network for using the load information acquired from the transformer agents to develop transformer information relating to the given distribution transformer; andan electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) in communication with the load management system and the transformer management system via the smart meter network;wherein, the load management system receives PEV information from a PEV plugged into the EVSE and receives the transformer information relating to the given distribution transformer from the transformer management system; andwherein the load management system determines charging information based on the PEV information and the transformer information of the given distribution transformer and provides the charging information to the PEV.

14. A system according to claim 13, wherein the PEV information comprises one or more of the group consisting of account information, charging plan, EVSE type, preferred charge time, power required, and charge rate.

15. A system according to claim 13, wherein the transformer information comprises one or more of the group consisting of vender/model ID, type of transformer, transformer capacity, maximum input voltage, minimum input voltage, duty, frequency range, voltage class, cooling type, magnetic form, and three phase winding configuration.

16. A system according to claim 13, wherein the charging information comprises one or more of the group consisting of charge start time, charge end time, charge duration, and charge rate.

17. A system according to claim 13, further comprising confirming, by the load management system, the PEV information.

18. A system according to claim 13, wherein the EVSE charges the PEV according to the charging information.

19. A system according to claim 13 wherein the transformer management system receives the PEV information and the charging information and updates the transformer information of the given distribution transformer based on the charging information and PEV information.

20. A system according to claim 11, wherein the load management system, the transformer management system, and the EVSE are in communication via the smart meter network.

21. A system according to claim 20, wherein the transformer information of the given distribution transformer is determined by the one or more transformer agents.

22. A system according to claim 21, wherein the transformer agents provide meter readings to the transformer management system and the transformer information is based on the meter readings.

23. A system according to claim 21, wherein the load management system comprises the transformer agents, and the transformer agents determine the charging information.

24. A system according to claim 23, wherein the transformer agents are adapted to determine charging information locally and autonomously.