System and method for managing spatiotemporal uncertainty

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9959629
  • Patent Number
    9,959,629
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 27, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 1, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Provided herein are methods and systems for managing spatiotemporal uncertainty in image processing. A method can comprise determining motion from a first image to a second image, determining a latency value, determining a precision value, generating an uncertainty element based upon the motion, the latency value, and the precision value, and rendering the uncertainty element.
Description
BACKGROUND

Spatiotemporal misalignments are often due to latency between the capture of an image at a remote source and the display of the captured image locally. Spatiotemporal misalignment or uncertainty may lead to spatial inaccuracies that compromise the fidelity of the composite image visualized by either participant in a real-time, shared first-person perspective session. In scenarios with significant motion and latency, for example, spatiotemporal uncertainty can be significant. While this uncertainty may not be very meaningful in low-risk contexts where pixel-level accuracy is unimportant, in a technical field such as microsurgery the accurate quantification of this error is crucial. It is therefore desirable to develop a system and method for managing the quantification and visualization of spatiotemporal uncertainty.


SUMMARY

Disclosed are systems and methods for managing spatiotemporal uncertainty. Disclosed are systems and methods for managing the quantification and visualization of spatiotemporal uncertainty. In the domain of real-time, dual first-person perspective videoconferencing, spatiotemporal uncertainty may arise due to network and processing-based latency. The determination and visualization of spatiotemporal uncertainty has the potential to mitigate some of the risk of performing precise tasks in contexts with latency.


In an aspect, a method can comprise determining motion from a first frame to a second frame, determining an uncertainty factor based on determined motion, and generating an uncertainty element based on the uncertainty factor.


Another method can comprise determining motion from a first image to a second image, determining a latency value, determining a precision value, and generating an uncertainty element based upon the motion, the latency value, and the precision value.


Another method can comprise determining a latency value, determining a latency offset for a first image based upon the latency value, locating a second image based upon the latency offset from the first frame, and generating a motion ghost overlaying the first frame, wherein the motion ghost comprises at least a portion of the second frame.


Additional advantages will be set forth in part in the description which follows or may be learned by practice. The advantages will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended inventive concepts. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not to be considered restrictive.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the methods and systems provided:



FIG. 1 illustrates virtual interactive presence;



FIG. 2A illustrates virtual interactive presence;



FIG. 2B illustrates a local expert assisting a remote user;



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary system;



FIG. 4A illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4B illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4C illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4D illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4E illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4F illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 4G illustrates an exemplary block diagram representing frame latency;



FIG. 4H illustrates an exemplary graph of opacity;



FIG. 4I illustrates a visualization of an uncertainty;



FIG. 4J illustrates a visualization of an uncertainty;



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary virtual presence system;



FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary processes performed within a graphics server;



FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary processes performed within a network server;



FIG. 8 illustrates a side view of an exemplary VIP display;



FIG. 9 illustrates a user's view of an exemplary VIP display;



FIG. 10 illustrates a user's view of an exemplary VIP display;



FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary method;



FIG. 12 illustrates another exemplary method;



FIG. 13 illustrates virtual presence in a remote surgical environment;



FIG. 14 illustrates merging of medical imaging with an operative field; and



FIG. 15 illustrates an exemplary operational environment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

Before the present methods and systems are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that the methods and systems are not limited to specific synthetic methods, specific components, or to particular compositions, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.


As used in the specification and the appended inventive concepts, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.


Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.


“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.


Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the word “comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other additives, components, integers or steps. “Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey an indication of a preferred or ideal embodiment.


Disclosed are components that can be used to perform the disclosed methods and systems. These and other components are disclosed herein, and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions, groups, etc. of these components are disclosed that while specific reference of each various individual and collective combinations and permutation of these may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods and systems. This applies to all aspects of this application including, but not limited to, steps in disclosed methods. Thus, if there are a variety of additional steps that can be performed it is understood that each of these additional steps can be performed with any specific embodiment or combination of embodiments of the disclosed methods.


The present methods and systems may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments and the Examples included therein and to the Figures and their previous and following description.


Disclosed are methods and systems for managing spatiotemporal uncertainty. The disclosed methods and systems can utilize virtual reality. Virtual reality (VR) refers to a computer-based application which provides a human-computer interface such that the computer and its devices create a sensory environment which is dynamically controlled by the actions of the individual, so that the environment appears “real” to the user. With VR, there is communication between a computer system and a user. The computer creates a sensory environment for the user to experience which may be, in one aspect, multisensory (although this is not essential) and the computer creates a sense of reality in response to user inputs.


In one exemplary aspect, the system disclosed can utilize at least two types of VR, Immersive and Non-immersive Immersive VR creates the illusion that the user is actually in a different environment. In one aspect, the system accomplishes this through the use of such devices as Head Mounted Displays (HMD's), earphones, and input devices such as gloves or wands. In another aspect, in order to enhance to realism of the experience, a plurality of Degrees of Freedom (DOF's) are utilized, which the software can simulate. Generally, the more the DOF's, the better the realism of the experience. Exemplary DOF's include, without limitation: X, Y, Z, roll, pitch, and yaw.


Non-immersive VR creates an environment that is differentiable from the user's surrounding environment. It does not give the illusion that the user is transported to another world. Non-immersive VR works by creating a 3-dimensional image and surround sound through the use of stereo projection systems, computer monitors, and/or stereo speakers. Non-immersive VR can be run from a personal computer without added hardware.


In one aspect, movement in Immersive VR can be realized by a system through the use of optical, acoustical, magnetic, or mechanical hardware called trackers. Preferably, the input devices have as many of these trackers as possible, so that movement can be more accurately represented. For instance, virtual gloves can have up to 3 trackers for each index, and more for the palm and wrist, so that the user can grab and press objects. In one aspect, the trackers can be equipped with positioning sensors, that tell a computer which direction the input is facing and how the input device is tilted in all directions. This gives a sensor with six degrees of freedom.


In another aspect, the system disclosed can utilize augmented reality (AR). AR can refer to a computer-based application which provides a human-computer interface such that the computer and its devices create an altered experience for the user through the inclusion of elements both real and virtual. An example of augmented reality that can be used in the present systems and methods includes, without limitation, the superimposition of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI) data onto an image of a patient. As another example, the use of AR can include the superimposition of patient biometric data on an image of a surgical field. Other fields can make use of the disclosed systems and methods.


Output devices bring the user to the virtual world. An example of an output device that can be used in the present system include, without limitation, head mounted displays (HMD) in the form of glasses or goggles, which allow a user to wear a display system on their head. One approach to the HMD is to use a single Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), wide enough to cover both eyes. Another approach is to have two separated displays—one for each eye. This takes somewhat more computer power, since the images displayed are different. Each display has a separate image rendered from the correct angle in the environment. Eye-tracking can be combined with HMDs. This can allow, for example, surgeons to move their eyes to the part of an image they want to enhance.


Another example of an output device that can be used in an embodiment of the present system is shuttered glasses. This device updates an image to each eye every other frame, with the shutter closed on the other eye. Shuttered glasses require a very high frame rate in order to keep the images from flickering. This device is used for stereo monitors, and gives an accurate 3-d representation of a 2-d object, but does not immerse the user in the virtual world.


Another output device that can be used in an embodiment of the present system is a screen with multiple projectors. The screen can be either a plane or bent. A challenge when using multiple projectors on the same screen is that there can be visible edges between the projections. This can be remedied be using a soft-edge system wherein the projection goes more and more transparent at the edges and the projections overlap. This produces an almost perfect transition between the images. In order to achieve a desired 3D effect, shuttered glasses can be used. Special glasses can be used, that alternate between making the glass either completely opaque or completely transparent. When the left eye is opaque, the right one is transparent. This is synchronized to the projectors that are projecting corresponding images on the screen.


In another aspect, a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE) can also be used in the present system. A CAVE can use mirrors in a cube-shaped room to project stereo images onto the walls, giving the illusion that you are standing in a virtual world. The world is constantly updated using trackers, and the user is allowed to move around almost completely uninhibited.


Disclosed are methods and systems for image registration. Such methods and systems can render a number of elements/participants virtually present into a field of interest in a manner such that the users can interact for any given purpose, such as the delivery of remote expertise. A field of interest can comprise varying amounts of “real” and “virtual” elements, depending on a point of view. Elements can include any “real” or “virtual” object, subject, participant, or image representation. Various components of the disclosed methods and systems are illustrated in FIG. 1.


A common field of interest 101 can be a field within which elements are physically and/or virtually present. Point of Reality (or Point of View) can refer to the vantage of the element/participant that is experiencing the common field of interest. In FIG. 1, exemplary points of reality, or points of view, are shown at 102 and 103, representing displays. The common field of interest 101 can appear similar from both vantages, or points of view, but each comprises differing combinations of local (physical) and remote (virtual) elements/participants.


Local elements can be elements and/or participants which are physically present in the common field of interest. In FIG. 1, element A 105 is a local element for field A 104 and is physically present in field A 104. Element B 107 is a local element for field B 106 and is physically present in field B 106. It is understood that virtual elements (not shown) can be inserted or overlaid in field A 104 and/or field B 106, as desired.


Remote elements can be elements and/or participants that are not physically present in the common field of interest. They are experienced as “virtually present” from any other local vantage point. As shown in FIG. 1, element B 107 is a remote element to field A 104 and is virtually present in field A 104. Element A 105 is a remote element in field B 106 and is virtually present in field B 106.


Methods for rendering a virtual interactive presence by combining local and remote elements and/or participants can comprise one or more of the following steps. A common local field can be rendered in a manner that reflects the presence of the field, elements and/or participants. As shown in FIG. 2A, Participant A can experience real elements in field A through a viewer. The common local field can be rendered such that it is experienced remotely in a manner that enables remote participants to experience it similarly to the local persons. As shown in FIG. 2A, this is illustrated by Participant A experiencing element B as virtually present in field A.


Remote persons can insert themselves and/or interact with the virtual field as rendered to them. For example, Participant A can insert hands, instruments, etc. into field A and interact with the virtual element(s) B. Viewer B can view a ‘virtual compliment’ to this, with Viewer B's real elements interacting with Participant A's virtual elements.


The common local field can be continuously updated such that the presence of the remote participants can be rendered in real time. For example, the remote scene can be the most up-to-date available with the time lag between the remote capture and the local render kept as low as possible. Conversely, if there is a need to introduce a timing difference, this can be accomplished as well.


The common local field can be scaled to a size and depth to meaningfully match the local scene. And the common local field can be configurable, such that remote elements can be made more or less transparent, removed entirely, or otherwise altered to suit the needs of the local user.


Each field is captured by a digital camera. The resulting image is physically distorted from its reality, based upon the physical characteristics of the camera. A processor, therefore, receives and displays a “physically” distorted version of the local reality. Likewise, a digital camera also captures the remote field(s), but the incoming stream is relayed through a transmission device and across a network. The processor, therefore, receives the remote stream that contains both physical and transmission-based distortion. The processor must then apply a series of transformations that removes the physical and transmission-based distortion from the common local field.


The local participants can experience the virtually present participants in a manner that enables continuous interaction in the common local field. FIG. 2B illustrates a local expert assisting a remote user. The hands of the local expert 201 are slightly transparent and superimposed into the field that is viewed by the remote user. The remote user can view the local expert's hands, the remote user's hands and a puzzle located at the remote user's location. The local expert is assisting the remote user in assembling a puzzle.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary image processing system 300. As shown, the system 300 can comprise a first display 302 and a second display 304 configured for displaying one or more of an image, a video, a composite video/image, and a common field of interest, for example. However, it is understood that any number of displays can be included in the system 300. In certain aspects, the second display 304 can be disposed remotely from the first display 302. As an example, each of the first display 302 and the second display 304 can be configured to render the common field of interest thereon. As a further example, each of the first display 302 and the second display 304 can be configured to render at least one of the local field and the remote field thereon. In certain aspects, at least one of the first display 302 and the second display 304 can be a VIP display, as described in further detail herein. However, it is understood that each of the first display 302 and the second display 304 can be any type of display including a monoscopic display and a stereoscopic display, for example. It is understood that any number of any type of display can be used.


A first sensor 306 can be in signal communication with at least the first display 302 and can be configured for obtaining image data such as a virtual presence data, for example. In certain aspects, the first sensor 306 can be one or more of a camera, an infrared sensor, a light sensor, a RADAR device, a SONAR device, a depth scan sensor, and the like. It is understood that the first sensor 306 can be any device or system capable of capturing/obtaining an image data representative of at least one of a “real” element” and a “virtual” element.


A second sensor 308 can be in signal communication with at least the second display 304 and can be configured for obtaining image data such as virtual presence data, for example. In certain aspects, the second sensor 308 can be one or more of a camera, an infrared sensor, a light sensor, a RADAR device, a SONAR device, a depth scan sensor, and the like. It is understood that the second sensor 308 can be any device or system capable of capturing/obtaining an image data representative of at least one of a “real” element” and a “virtual” element. It is further understood that any number of sensors can be used.


A plurality of processors 310, 312 can be in direct or indirect signal communication with at least one of the first display 302, the second display 304, the first sensor 306, and the second sensor 308. Each of the processors 310, 312 can be configured to render the image data collected by the sensors 306, 308 onto at least one of the displays 302, 304. It is understood that the processors 310, 312 can be configured to modify the image data and the resultant image for transmission and display. It is further understood that any number of processors can be used, including one. In certain aspects, the system 300 comprises only the processor 310, 312 in data communication with each other.


In certain aspects, each of the displays 302, 304 can comprise an associated one of the processors 310, 312 for rendering images onto the displays 302, 304. Each of the processors 310, 312, or another system comprising a processor, can communicate with each other through a network connection. For example, remote sites can connect via the Internet or other network. Tasks can be divided amongst each of the processors 310, 312. For example, one of the processors 310, 312 can be configured as a graphics processor or graphics server and can gather images from one of the sensors 306, 308 and/or a network server, perform an image composition tasks, and drive one or more of the displays 302, 304.


In an aspect, one or more of the processors 310, 312 can be configured to render an image. As an example, one or more of the processors 310, 312 can be configured to render a common field of interest that reflects a presence of a plurality of elements based upon the image data obtained by at least one of the sensors 306, 308. As a further example, at least one of the elements rendered in the common field of interest can be a remote element physically located remotely from another of the elements. The processors 310, 312 can also be configured to render/output the common field of interest to at least one of the displays 302, 304. As an example, the processors 310, 312 can render interaction between a remote user and a local user in the common field of interest. As a further example the presence of the remote element can be rendered in real time to the local user and the presence of a local element can be rendered in real time to the remote user.



FIG. 4A illustrates exemplary process 400 that can be performed with at least one of the processors 310, 312. Other processor and/or computing devices can be used to perform the process 400. In step 402, motion can be determined. As an example, a plurality of images can be rendered as a sequence of frames. As a further example, motion of elements and/or subjects represented in the images can be determined from a first frame to a second frame. In an aspect, the first frame can be a current frame and the second frame can be a previous frame of a series or sequence of images.


In an aspect, motion represented by a plurality of images or frames can be determined (e.g., calculated, estimated, retrieved) using a motion estimation algorithm (e.g., block matching algorithm). Motion estimation algorithms can be used in streaming video applications to eliminate the transmission of redundant video data. As an example, an encoder can estimate the motion in the current frame with respect to a previous reference frame by examining the similarity between pixel regions in a current image with pixel regions in a previous reference image. As another example, phase correlation, optical flow, and Bayesian estimator techniques can be utilized to perform motion estimation. As a further example, statistical functions can be employed to perform motion estimation.


In step 404, an uncertainty factor can be determined. In an aspect, the uncertainty factor can be based on the motion determined in step 402. As an example, the uncertainty factor can be a value, measurement, extrapolation, data point, or other aspect that can affect an uncertainty of position of any pixel, object, subject, element, or the like. As a further example, the uncertainty factor can comprise one or more of a network latency, jitter, a local latency, a processing latency, a frame latency, an acceptable error, and a tolerance.


In step 406, an uncertainty element can be generated. In an aspect, the uncertainty element can be generated based on one or more of the motion determined in step 402 and the uncertainty factor(s) determined in step 404. As an example, the uncertainty element can be rendered (e.g., transmitted, presented, etc.) to a device and/or user. As a further example, the uncertainty element can be rendered as an audio, visual, and/or tactile feedback to a user.


As an example, FIG. 4B illustrates an exemplary process for motion estimation. Other motion estimation techniques and/or algorithms can be used. In step 408, an image region can be determined. As an example, the image region can be a macroblock with standard dimensions set forth in a video compression standard such as H.263 or H.264. As another example, an image region can be determined by a selecting an arbitrarily sized area in an image (e.g., a first image or frame). As a further example, the image region can be determined with user-provided input.


In step 410, a step size can be determined. As an example, the step size can be a numerical value dependent on context of the content of one or more images. As a further example, the larger the step size, the more accurate the motion estimation. In step 412, the image region in the first frame can be compared to an image region in a second frame. As an example, an image region in a second frame that is correspondingly located to the image region in the first frame can be tested for comparison with the image region in the first frame. As another example, eight image regions in a second frame that are a distance equal to the step size from the image region in the second frame can be tested for comparison with the image region in the first frame.


In an aspect, a cost function can be employed to perform a comparison between the luminance of image regions. As another example, a cost function can be utilized to perform a comparison between the color of image regions. In an exemplary aspect, the cost function can be the mean absolute difference (MAD). In another aspect, the cost function can be the mean squared difference (MSD). In a further aspect, the cost function can be a cross-correlation function. In step 414, the cost function can be minimized. As an example, the minimization of a cost function can comprise selecting a new center point for comparison.


In step 416, the step size can be reduced. As an example, the step size can be reduced by subtracting one from the step size. As another example, the step size can be reduced by halving the step size. In step 418, the step size can be checked with conditional logic (e.g., IF/THEN statements). In an exemplary aspect, if the step size is larger than one, then the process returns to step 410; if not, the process moves forward to step 420.


In step 420, a motion vector can be generated. In an aspect, the motion vector can allow a representation of the estimated motion of image regions across multiple frames or images. As an example, a motion vector can be generated from the image region in a current frame to a center point of an image region in a previous frame with minimum distortion as determined by the output of a cost function. As another example, a motion vector can be generated from the image region in a previous frame to the center point of an image region in a current frame with minimum distortion as determined by the output of a cost function. As a further example, a motion vector can be generated for each image region in an image or portion of an image, which in aggregate can be referred to as a vector map. In an aspect, the motion vector can be transformed (e.g., inverted, divided, multiplied) and/or applied to a visualization technique in order to render an uncertainty due to the motion. Various techniques can be used to process the motion vector to estimate and/or visualize the motion and uncertainty represented by the motion vector.


Returning to FIG. 4A, in step 404, an uncertainty factor can be determined. In an aspect, the uncertainty factor can be based on the motion determined in step 402. As an example, the uncertainty factor can be a value, measurement, extrapolation, data point, or other aspect that can affect an uncertainty of position of any pixel, object, subject, element, or the like. As a further example, the uncertainty factor can comprise one or more of a network latency, jitter, a local latency, a processing latency, a frame latency, an acceptable error, and a tolerance.


As an illustrative example, FIG. 4C shows a method for determining an uncertainty factor. In step 426, network latency can be determined. As an example, a network latency value can be retrieved (e.g., sampled) from an external device (e.g., hardware codec). As another example, network latency can be sampled from a software program. As a further example, network latency can be iteratively sampled based upon a pre-defined time period (e.g., one second). As an additional example, network latency can be retrieved by taking a rolling average of observed latencies over a time period. In an aspect, the network latency can comprise jitter.


In step 428, local latency (e.g., capture, process, draw cycle) can be determined. In an aspect, one or more images (e.g., frames of a plurality of images) can be time stamped from moment captured to moment displayed. In another aspect, local latency can be iteratively sampled from the processors 310, 312 (FIG. 3). Accordingly, a difference from capture to display of one or more frames and/or images can be defined as the local latency.


In step 430, the uncertainty factor can be determined based upon one or more of the network latency determined in step 426 and the local latency determined in step 428. As an example, the uncertainty factor can comprise a cumulative or total latency comprising one or more of the network latency and local latency. As a further example, the uncertainty factor can comprise a worst-case latency value determined by summing latency and/or average latency and/or jitter to one standard deviation above the mean.


As an illustrative example, FIG. 4D shows a method for determining an uncertainty factor. In step 432, a precision value can be determined. In an aspect, the precision value can comprise a pre-determined acceptable error. As an example, the precision value can comprise a user-provided acceptable error (e.g., number of pixels). The precision value can be dependent on context, wherein the lower the precision value, the less accurate the rendered images. In an aspect, the precision value is a scalar quantity that can be multiplied by one or more motion vectors in a vector map. In another aspect, the user-provided acceptable error is a scalar quantity that can be multiplied by one or more motion vectors in a vector map. In step 434, the uncertainty factor can be determined based upon one or more of the precision value, the network latency, jitter and the local latency.


Returning to FIG. 4A, in step 406, an uncertainty element can be generated. In an aspect, the uncertainty element can be generated based on one or more of the motion determined in step 402 and the uncertainty factor(s) determined in step 404.


As an illustrative example, FIG. 4E shows a method for generating an uncertainty element. In step 436, an uncertainty region (e.g., plurality of pixels, region of pixels surrounding at least a portion of a periphery of an element, object, subject in an image) can be generated. As an example, the uncertainty element can be visualized as an uncertainty region. In an aspect, the uncertainty region can be one or more pixels substantially projecting from one or more of a motion vector and a transformed motion vector (e.g., inverse of a motion vector generated at step 420). As an example, a size of the uncertainty region can be based upon the latency value. As a further example, a size of the uncertainty region is proportional to a magnitude of the vector. As a further example, a size of the uncertainty region is proportional to the precision value. As an additional example, a size of the uncertainty region is proportional to the acceptable error.


In an aspect, the uncertainty element can comprise an indicator or graphic that communicates the level of uncertainty to a user. As an example, the indicator can be a meter, gauge, or scale, a color spectrum, and/or and quantitative representation of the uncertainty (e.g., uncertainty factor) and/or latency. As another example, the indicator can be rendered as a visualization when other visualization methods are not utilized. As a further example, the indicator can represent an uncertainty in an image as a reactionary (e.g., uncertainty of past position or and/or motion) or predictive element (e.g., uncertainty of future position or and/or motion). In an aspect, the indicator can reflect variation over time in the summed magnitude of one or more vectors scaled by an uncertainty factor (e.g., derived from step 404) in a vector map. In another aspect, the indicator can reflect variation in an aggregate sum of motion for one or more frames or images.


In step 438, a visualization can be rendered. In an aspect, the visualization can represent the uncertainty element. As an example, the visualization can comprise a colorization of pixels, an icon, an indicator, and/or a blurring of pixels. As another example, software such as OpenGL can be utilized to perform the visualization. As a further example, the visualization can be rendered in a portion (e.g., polygon) of a frame or image.


As an illustrative example, FIG. 4F shows a method for determining an uncertainty factor. In step 440, a latency value can be determined. As an example, the latency value can comprise one or more of network latency, local latency, and jitter. As a further example, a network latency value can be retrieved (e.g., sampled) from an external device or program (e.g., codec). As a further example, network latency can be iteratively sampled based upon a pre-defined time period (e.g., one second). In an aspect, network latency can be retrieved by taking a rolling average of observed latencies over a time period. In an aspect, the network latency can comprise jitter. In an aspect, local latency (e.g., capture, process, draw cycle) can be determined. In an aspect, one or more images (e.g., frames of a plurality of images) can be time stamped from moment captured to moment displayed.


In step 442, frame offset or latency offset can be determined. As an example, the frame latency can be defined by a frame offset based upon one or more of the local latency and the network latency. As a further example, a frame offset can be determined by multiplying the total latency by a rendering rate (e.g., frames per second) of the rendered images. In step 444, a frame or image can be located. As an illustrative example, FIG. 4G illustrates a series or sequences of frames (e.g., as stored in system memory 1512). Typically, frames are processed with respect to a timeline R. As an example, a plurality of images can be rendered as a sequence of frames X, Y, Z, U. As a further example, each of the frames can comprise an identifier such as time stamps A, B, C, D and sequential frame identifiers E, F, G, H. In an aspect, a first frame can be a current frame U and a second frame X can be a previous frame of a series or sequence of images. In an aspect, a frame offset L can be used to locate a previous image X with respect to a currently rendered image U by subtracting the frame offset from the frame identifier H of frame U. In another aspect, a frame latency N can be determined by subtracting the timestamp of the image X from the timestamp of the currently rendered image U (e.g., frame).


Returning to FIG. 4F, in step 446, an uncertainty element can be generated. In an aspect, the uncertainty element can comprise a rendering of the frame located at step 444. As an example, the located frame can be merged with a local image. In an aspect, the uncertainty element can comprise an overlay or a ghosted image of the located frame. As an example, a ghosted image can be a processed image merged with a local image.


In an aspect, an opacity of the ghosted image can be variable. For example, the opacity of the ghosted image can change based upon the graph shown in FIG. 4H. As shown in FIG. 4H, the opacity of a currently rendered image frame U may be set at 1. The opacity of previous frames Y, Z may be decreased linearly, and then increased toward a located frame X. However, the opacity of the ghosted image can be changed based upon any function or along any plot.


As an illustrative example, a visualization can represent a user moving a pen or other object or tool, as illustrated in FIG. 4I. Accordingly, a currently rendered frame 448 can be ghosted with motion artifacts from a previous frame 448′, effectively allowing the user to visualize the frames currently being seen and reacted to by a remote user. As a further example, a sequence of frames between the currently rendered frame 448 and a previous frame 448′ can be ghosted. As shown in the previous 448′, a user's right hand 450 with pen 452 plans an incision on a surgical field 454. A remote user 456 provides instruction. In the currently rendered frame 448, as a user's right hand 450 with pen 452 goes into motion, motion artifacts 458, 459 allow visualization of the frames currently being seen by a remote user. This can alert the user of the disparity between what is being reacted to and what is currently happening. In an aspect, the visualization can include a blurring of the pixels representing the object of uncertainty or an area near the object of uncertainty. As an example, a colorization or alert color can be used to visually represent that the image being rendered comprises some level of uncertainty.


As an illustrative example, FIG. 4J shows a bidirectional capture, process, and display of images onto displays (e.g., displays 302, 304 (FIG. 3)). Typically, frames are processed with respect to a timeline 460. A first frame 462 is shown with an element 464 (e.g., captured by sensor 306 and visualized on display 302). A second frame 466 is shown with an element 468 (e.g., captured by sensor 308 and visualized on display 304). As the element 464 moves along a downward vertical motion, a ghost 469 (e.g., derived from step 446) of the first frame 462 can be visualized in a third frame 462′ (e.g., on display 302). Additionally, element 468 can be rendered along with an uncertainty region 470 (e.g., derived from step 436).


On one display (e.g., display 304), the element 468 is shown in the second frame 466. As the element 468 moves leftward, a ghost 472 (e.g., derived from step 446) of the second frame 466 can be visualized on a fourth frame 466′ (e.g., on display 304). Additionally, the element 464 can be rendered in the fourth frame 466′ along with an uncertainty region 474 (e.g., derived from step 436).


In an aspect, the example illustrated in FIG. 4J can allow a viewer of displays 302, 304 to visualize the local images captured by sensors 306, 308 that are being reacted to by a remote user. Further, the example illustrated in FIG. 4J can allow a viewer of displays 302, 304 to a view an estimation of the current image being captured by a remote sensor 306, 308. In this manner, the effects of local and network latency can be decreased from the standpoint of a viewer.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary virtual presence system. One such system can be used by each remote participant that is to join the same session. Each system can communicate with each other through a network connection. For example, remote sites can connect via the internet. Tasks can be divided amongst a plurality of computers in each system. For example, one computer (a graphics server) can gather images from local cameras and a network server, perform the stereo image composition tasks, and drive a local stereoscopic display system. As a further example, the processor(s) 310 of system 300 can be embodied by the graphics server.



FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary processes that can be performed with the graphics server. Images can be gathered into local data structures (frame rings). Local images can be gathered from a plurality of cameras, for example two cameras. Remote images can be provided by the network server via a high-speed remote direct memory access (RDMA) connection, for example. These images can be combined so that the remote user and the local user can be seen in the same scene (as in FIG. 3). This composite result can be transmitted to a local stereoscopic display system. A second computer can act as the network server, which can perform network encoding/decoding tasks as well as depth map generation, for example.



FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary processes that can be performed with the network server. Local images gathered from the graphics server via the RDMA connection can be analyzed and mapped with depth information, encoded for efficient network transmission, and sent to an external network connection to be received by a corresponding network server at the remote site. Simultaneously, encoded images and depth maps can be received from the remote site, decoded, and provided to the local graphics server via the RDMA connection.


The system can be user-controlled by a control terminal connected to the network server; the user can then access and control the graphics server via the dedicated network connection to the network server.


Parameters of virtual interactive presence can be configured depending on the system used. Configurable parameters include, but are not limited to, size of virtual elements, presence of virtual elements (opaque, translucent, etc.), time of virtual presence (time can be configured to be delayed, slowed, increased, etc.), superimposition of elements such that any combination of virtual and real can be superimposed and/or ‘fitted’ over one another, and the like.



FIG. 8 illustrates a side view of an exemplary VIP display. FIG. 9 illustrates a user's view of an exemplary VIP display. FIG. 10 illustrates a user's view of an exemplary VIP display.


As used herein, a “local” field of interest can refer to a local physical field and local user, thus making every other field remote. Each field can be local to its local physical user, but remote to other users. The composite of the fields can be a common field of interest. This is distinct from common “virtual worlds” in that there can be components of “real” within the local rendering of the common field of interest and interactions can be between actual video (and other) renderings of physical objects and not just graphic avatars representing users and objects. The methods and systems provided allow for virtual interactive presence to modify/optimize a physical domain by the interplay of real and virtual.


In an aspect, illustrated in FIG. 11, provided are methods for virtual interactive presence comprising rendering a common field of interest that reflects the physical presence of a remote user and a local user at 1101, rendering interaction between the remote user and the local user in the common field of interest at 1102, and continuously updating the common field of interest such that the presence of the remote user is rendered in real time to the local user and the presence of the local user is rendered in real time to the remote user at 1103.


The common field of interest can be rendered such that the remote user experiences the common field of interest similarly to the local user. The local user can experience the remote user's physical presence in a manner that enables continuous interaction in the common field of interest with the remote user. The methods can further comprise rendering the physical presence of a local object in the common field and rendering interaction between the local user and the local object in the common field. The methods can further comprise rendering the physical presence of a local object in the common field of interest and rendering interaction between the remote user and the local object in the common field of interest.


In another aspect, illustrated in FIG. 12, provided are methods for virtual interactive presence comprising rendering a local field of interest that reflects the physical presence of a local object, a volumetric image of the local object, and a local user at 1201, rendering interaction between the local object, the volumetric image, and the local user in the local field of interest at 1202, and continuously updating the local field of interest such that the presence of the local object and the volumetric image of the local object is rendered in real time to the local user at 1203.


The local object can be, for example, a patient and the volumetric image of the local object can be, for example, a medical image of a part of the patient. However, the local object can be any object of interest and the image of the local object can be any accurate rendering of that object. For example, could be an automobile engine and a 3D graphic of the engine, etc.


The medical image can be, for example, one of, an x-ray image, an MRI image, or a CT image. The methods can further comprise superimposing, by the local user, the volumetric image onto the local object. The superimposition can be performed automatically by a computer.


The methods can further comprise adjusting, by the local user, a property of the volumetric image. The property can be one or more of transparency, spatial location, and scale.


The methods can further comprise rendering a local tool in the local field of interest. The methods can further comprise rendering the local tool in accurate spatial relation to the rendering of the local object. The tool can be any type of tool, for example, a surgical tool.


In another aspect, provided are systems for virtual presence, comprising a virtual presence display, configured for displaying a common field of interest, a local sensor, configured for obtaining local virtual presence data, a network interface, configured for transmitting local virtual presence data and receiving remote virtual presence data, and a processor, coupled to the virtual presence display, the local sensor, and the network interface, wherein the processor is configured to perform steps comprising, rendering a common field of interest that reflects the physical presence of a remote user and a local user based on the local virtual presence data and the remote virtual presence data, rendering interaction between the remote user and the local user in the common field of interest, continuously updating the common field of interest such that the presence of the remote user is rendered in real time to the local user and the presence of the local user is rendered in real time to the remote user, and outputting the common field of interest to the virtual presence display.


The virtual presence display can be one or more of a stereoscopic display, a monoscopic display (such as a CRT, LCD, etc.), and the like. The sensor can be one or more of a camera, an infrared sensor, a depth scan sensor, and the like. The common field of interest can be rendered such that the remote user experiences the common field of interest similarly to the local user. The local user can experience the remote user's physical presence in a manner that enables continuous interaction in the common field of interest with the remote user.


The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising rendering the physical presence of a local object in the common field of interest and rendering interaction between the local user and the local object in the common field of interest.


The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising rendering the physical presence of a local object in the common field of interest and rendering interaction between the remote user and the local object in the common field of interest.


Further provided are systems for virtual presence, comprising a virtual presence display, configured for displaying a local field of interest, a local sensor, configured for obtaining local virtual presence data, a processor, coupled to the virtual presence display and the local sensor, wherein the processor is configured to perform steps comprising, rendering a local field of interest that reflects the physical presence of a local object and a local user based on the local virtual presence data and a volumetric image of the local object, rendering interaction between the local object, the volumetric image, and the local user in the local field of interest, continuously updating the local field of interest such that the presence of the local object and the volumetric image of the local object is rendered in real time to the local user, and outputting the local field of interest to the virtual presence display.


The virtual presence display can be one or more of a stereoscopic display, a monoscopic display (such as a CRT, LCD, etc.), and the like. The sensor can be one or more of a camera, an infrared sensor, a depth scan sensor, and the like.


The local object can be, for example, a patient and the volumetric image of the local object can be, for example, a medical image of a part of the patient. The medical image can be, for example, one of, an x-ray image, an MRI image, or a CT image. However, the local object can be any object of interest and the image of the local object can be any accurate rendering of that object. For example, could be an automobile engine and a 3D graphic of the engine, etc.


The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising superimposing, by the local user, the volumetric image onto the local object. The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising adjusting, by the local user, a property of the volumetric image. The property can be one or more of transparency, spatial location, and scale.


The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising rendering a local tool in the local field of interest. The processor can be further configured to perform steps comprising rendering the local tool in accurate spatial relation to the rendered local object.


The disclosed methods and systems can have broad applications. For example, surgery, gaming, mechanics, munitions, battle field presence, instructional efforts (training) and/or any other situation where interaction is part of the scenario.


Also disclosed are methods and systems that enable a remote expert to be virtually present within a local surgical field. Virtual interactive presence can be used to enable two surgeons remote from each other to interactively perform a surgical procedure. The methods and system enable two or more operators to be virtually present, and interactive, within the same real operative field, thus supporting remote assistance and exporting surgical expertise.


The methods and systems can also be used to superimpose imaging data of the operative anatomy onto the anatomy itself for guidance and orientation (augmented reality). The methods and systems can be used for training of students. The methods and systems augment and enhance the field of robotics by virtually bringing an expert into the robotic field to guide the robot operator. The methods and systems are applicable to endoscopic procedures by inserting the expert's hands directly into the endoscopic field for guidance. The methods and systems expand remote surgery by providing the assistance of a remote expert to an actual local surgeon, whose basic skills can handle emergencies, and who will learn from the virtual interaction. The methods and systems can be used at trauma sites and other medical environments. The methods and systems can be used to provide remote assistance in other areas such as engineering, construction, architecture, and the like. The methods and systems disclosed can be used to transmit expertise to a remote ‘site of need’, merge contemporary imaging directly into the surgical field, and train surgical students


An exemplary remote surgical assistance system for transmitting surgical maneuvers of a local expert to a remote surgeon for the purpose of guiding/assisting the remote surgeon is illustrated in FIG. 13. The remote surgical field can be viewed by the remote surgeon with a binocular video system. The video system can show the field with his hands and instruments performing the procedure. The viewing system can be referred to as a surgical videoscope.


The binocular video rendering of the remote field can be transmitted to the local expert), who can view the (now virtual) stereoscopic rendering of the procedure through a second surgical videoscope system. The local expert can insert his hands into the virtual field, thus seeing his real hands within the virtual field.


The video image of the local expert's hands can be transmitted back to the remote surgeon's surgical videoscope system superimposed into the real field. The remote surgeon can then see the expert's virtual hands within his surgical field in a spatially/anatomically relevant context. With this system, the local expert can use his hands to show the remote surgeon how to perform the case.


Exemplary elements of the system can comprise a remote station where the remote surgeon can perform the operative procedure, a remote surgical videoscope system comprised of, for example, a fixed stereoscopic videoscope that may resemble a mounted microscope. This apparatus can be used by the remote surgeon to view the operative field. Any other type of suitable VIP display can be used. The system can project the binocular video image to a similar local surgical videoscope at a local station. The local surgical videoscope can receive the binocular video image of the remote procedure and allow the local expert to view it. The local videoscope can view the local surgeons hands as they move within the virtual remote field as viewed through the local videoscope. The local videoscope can then transmit the local expert's hands back to the remote videoscope so that the remote surgeon can see the expert's virtual hands within the real field.


With this system, the local expert can show the remote surgeon the appropriate maneuvers that result in successful completion of the case. The remote surgeon can have a basic skill set to carry out the new procedure. Therefore, the local expert can simply demonstrates to the remote surgeon new ways to apply the skill set. This system does not have to supplant the remote surgeon, but can be used to enhance his/her capability. The remote surgeon can be on hand to rapidly deal with any emergencies. Time delay is minimized because the remote surgeon can use his/her own hands to perform the task, eliminating the need for the local expert to manipulate remote robotic apparatuses.


Also disclosed are methods and systems for merging contemporary medical imaging onto an operative field. A volume image can be obtained of the operative field. For example, a volume MRI of the head, prior to the surgical procedure. The image data can be reconstructed into a three dimensional rendering of the anatomy. This rendering can be transmitted to the surgical videoscope that will be used to view the operative field. Through the videoscope, the surgeon can view this 3D rendering in a translucent manner superimposed onto the surgical field. In this case, the surgeon would see a rendered head superimposed on the real head. Using software tools in the surgical videoscope interface, the surgeon can rotate and scale the rendered image until it “fits” the real head. The videoscope system can allow the surgeon to differentially fade the rendered head and real head so that the surgeon can “look into” the real head and plan the surgery.


Exemplary elements of the system can comprise a surgical videoscope viewing system through which the surgeon views the surgical field. A computer for reconstruction of a volume-acquired MRI/CT (or other) image with sufficient resolution to enable matching it to the real surgical anatomy. The volume rendered image can be displayed through the videoscope system so that the surgeon can see it stereoscopically. A software interface can enable the surgeon to vary the translucency of the rendered and real anatomy so that the rendered anatomy can be superimposed onto the real anatomy. The surgeon can “open up” the rendered anatomy to view any/all internal details of the image as they relate to the real anatomy. Surgical tools can be spatially registered to the rendered anatomy so that behavior can be tracked and applied to the image.


As shown in FIG. 14, an example of such a task is placing small objects inside a jar of dark gelatin so that they are not visible to the surgeon. The task is for the surgeon to use a long forceps to reach into the gelatin and touch or grasp the objects. The Surgical Videoscope system can obtain a volume scan of the gelatin jar and render the jar in three dimensions and display a binocular rendering through the videoscope. The surgeon can view the rendering and the real jar through the scope system and fit the rendered jar onto the real jar. By differentially adjusting translucency, the surgeon can reach into the real jar with a forceps and grasp a selected object, while avoiding other designated objects.


The grasping instrument can be spatially registered onto the volumetric rendering of the surgical field, thereby allowing a graphic of the tool to be displayed on the rendering of the surgical field in appropriate anatomic orientation. This can provide enhanced guidance. This can be implemented by touching designated landmarks on the real object (jar) with a digitizer that communicates with the image rendering system, thus defining the object/probe relationship. Because the object (jar) is registered to the image of the jar by superimposition, a graphic of the probe can be displayed in relation to the image of the jar enabling virtual surgery.


There are many situations in which the present system can be used. For example, remote surgery, medical training, and tele-medicine, which can be used for third world countries or in a military situation. Surgeons remotely located from patients can assist other surgeons near the patient, can assist medics near the patient, and can perform surgical operations when coupled to a robotic surgery system. Other examples include, augmented or enhanced surgery—normal surgery using virtual environments, an example of which is endoscopic surgery. Surgical procedures can also be simulated. Surgeons located remote from each other may plan and practice a procedure before carrying out the operation on a real patient.


Other applications include the preparation of patient before surgery, medical therapy, preventative medicine, exposure therapy, reducing phobias, training people with disabilities and skill enhancement, and the like.


The viewer then views the projection through passive stereoscopic polarized glasses (similar to sunglasses) that route the left-eye image to the left eye, and the right-eye image to the right eye. This provides an illusion of stereopsis when the correctly-offset images are properly rendered by the software. The system can be replaced by other types of stereoscopic displays with no functional detriment to the system. The stereoscopic display can comprise at least two display projectors fitted with polarizing lenses, a back-projection screen material that maintains light polarization upon diffusion, special glasses that restrict each eye to see only light of a particular polarization, and the viewer. The image to be viewed can be rendered with two slightly different view transformations, reflecting the different locations of the ideal viewer's two eyes. One projector displays the image rendered for the left eye's position, and the other projector displays the image rendered for the right eye's position. The glasses restrict the light so that the left eye sees only the image rendered for it, and the right eye sees only the image rendered for it. The viewer, presented with a reasonable stereoscopic image, will perceive depth.



FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary operating environment for performing the disclosed methods. This exemplary operating environment is only an example of an operating environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of operating environment architecture. Neither should the operating environment be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment.


The methods can be operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the system and method include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, laptop devices, and multiprocessor systems. Additional examples include set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.


The methods may be described in the general context of computer instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The system and method may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.


The methods disclosed herein can be implemented via one or more general-purpose computing devices in the form of a computer 1501. The components of the computer 1501 can include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 1503, a system memory 1512, and a system bus 1513 that couples various system components including the processor 1503 to the system memory 1512.


The system bus 1513 represents one or more of several possible types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, such architectures can include an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, an Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, a Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and a Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus also known as a Mezzanine bus. This bus, and all buses specified in this description can also be implemented over a wired or wireless network connection. The bus 1513, and all buses specified in this description can also be implemented over a wired or wireless network connection and each of the subsystems, including the processor 1503, a mass storage device 1504, an operating system 1505, application software 1506, data 1507, a network adapter 1508, system memory 1512, an Input/Output Interface 1510, a display adapter 1509, a display device 1511, and a human machine interface 1502, can be contained within one or more remote computing devices 1514a,b,c at physically separate locations, connected through buses of this form, in effect implementing a fully distributed system.


The computer 1501 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Such media can be any available media that is accessible by the computer 1501 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media. The system memory 1512 includes computer readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM), and/or non-volatile memory, such as read only memory (ROM). The system memory 1512 typically contains data such as data 1507 and/or program modules such as operating system 1505 and application software 1506 that are immediately accessible to and/or are presently operated on by the processing unit 1503.


The computer 1501 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media. By way of example, FIG. 15 illustrates a mass storage device 1504 which can provide non-volatile storage of computer code, computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for the computer 1501. For example, a mass storage device 1504 can be a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk, a removable optical disk, magnetic cassettes or other magnetic storage devices, flash memory cards, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, random access memories (RAM), read only memories (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), and the like.


Any number of program modules can be stored on the mass storage device 1504, including by way of example, an operating system 1505 and application software 1506. Each of the operating system 1505 and application software 1506 (or some combination thereof) may include elements of the programming and the application software 1506. Data 1507 can also be stored on the mass storage device 1504. Data 1507 can be stored in any of one or more databases known in the art. Examples of such databases include, DB2®, Microsoft® Access, Microsoft® SQL Server, Oracle®, mySQL, PostgreSQL, and the like. The databases can be centralized or distributed across multiple systems.


A user can enter commands and information into the computer 1501 via an input device (not shown). Examples of such input devices include, but are not limited to, a keyboard, pointing device (e.g., a “mouse”), a microphone, a joystick, a serial port, a scanner, tactile input devices such as gloves, and other body coverings, and the like. These and other input devices can be connected to the processing unit 1503 via a human machine interface 1502 that is coupled to the system bus 1513, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, or a universal serial bus (USB).


A display device 1511 can also be connected to the system bus 1513 via an interface, such as a display adapter 1509. A computer 1501 can have more than one display adapter 1509 and a computer 1501 can have more than one display device 1511. For example, a display device can be a monitor, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), or a projector. In addition to the display device 1511, other output peripheral devices can include components such as speakers (not shown) and a printer (not shown) which can be connected to the computer 1501 via Input/Output Interface 1510.


The computer 1501 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computing devices 1514a,b,c. By way of example, a remote computing device can be a personal computer, portable computer, a server, a router, a network computer, a peer device or other common network node, and so on. Logical connections between the computer 1501 and a remote computing device 1514a,b,c can be made via a local area network (LAN) and a general wide area network (WAN). Such network connections can be through a network adapter 1508. A network adapter 1508 can be implemented in both wired and wireless environments. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet 1515.


One or more VIP displays 1516a,b,c,d,e can communicate with the computer 1501. In one aspect, VIP display 1516e can communicate with computer 1501 through the input/output interface 1510. This communication can be wired or wireless. Remote VIP displays 1516a,b,c can communicate with computer 1501 by communicating first with a respective remote computing device 1514a,b,c which then communicates with computer 1501 through the network adapter 1508 via a network such as the Internet 1515. Remote VIP display 1516d can communicate with computer 1501 without the need for a remote computing device. Remote VIP display 1516d can communicate via a network, such as the Internet 1515. The VIP displays 1516a,b,c,d,e can communicate wireless or through a wired connection. The VIP displays 1516a,b,c,d,e can communicate individual or collectively as part of a VIP display network.


For purposes of illustration, application programs and other executable program components such as the operating system 1505 are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computing device 1501, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer. An implementation of application software 1506 may be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise “computer storage media” and “communications media.” “Computer storage media” include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computer.


Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the inventive concepts or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that an order be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possible non-express basis for interpretation, including: matters of logic with respect to arrangement of steps or operational flow; plain meaning derived from grammatical organization or punctuation; the number or type of embodiments described in the specification.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present methods and systems without departing from the scope or spirit. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: determining, by a computing device, motion from a first image to a second image;generating, by a computing device, an uncertainty element based upon the motion wherein the uncertainty element is generated based upon a transformed motion vector; andcausing, by a computing device, rendering of the uncertainty element, wherein the uncertainty element is an indicator comprising at least one of a meter, a gauge, a scale, and a color spectrum.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the motion is determined from a motion estimation algorithm.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the motion is determined from a block matching algorithm.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first image is a current frame and the second image is a previous frame of a series of images.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising generating a motion vector directed from the current frame to the previous frame.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the motion vector is generated based upon the determined motion.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining, by a computing device, a latency value, wherein the uncertainty element is further based upon the latency value.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein rendering the uncertainty element comprises rendering an uncertainty region and a size of the uncertainty region is based upon the latency value.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the latency value is determined based upon one or more of a local latency, a network latency, and a jitter.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the uncertainty element includes an uncertainty region projecting from one or more of the vector and an inverse of the vector.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein a size of the uncertainty region is proportional to a magnitude of the vector.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein rendering the uncertainty element comprises rendering an uncertainty region.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the uncertainty region is rendered as one or more of a blur, a ghost, and a coloration.
  • 14. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium bearing instructions that, upon execution by one or more processors, effectuate operations comprising: determining a latency value;determining a latency offset for a first image based upon the latency value;locating a second image based upon the latency offset from the first image; andgenerating a motion ghost overlaying the first image, wherein the motion ghost comprises at least a portion of the second image, and wherein the motion ghost has opacity that is distinct from an opacity of the first image.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the first image is a current frame and the second image is a previous frame of a series of images.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14, wherein the latency value is determined based upon one or more of a network latency and a local latency.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium bearing instructions that, upon execution by one or more processors, effectuate operations comprising: determining motion from a first frame to a second frame;determining an uncertainty factor based on determined motion;generating an uncertainty element based on the uncertainty factor; andcausing the uncertainty element to be graphically rendered, overlaying a portion of the first frame, wherein the uncertainty element has opacity that is distinct from an opacity of the first frame.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the uncertainty factor comprises a motion vector.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/476,712, filed May 21, 2012, entitled “System and Method for Managing Spatiotemporal Uncertainty,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
3931679 Carter Jan 1976 A
4601664 Bertino, III et al. Jul 1986 A
4970666 Welsh et al. Nov 1990 A
5102340 Berlinghoff et al. Apr 1992 A
5391081 Lampotang et al. Feb 1995 A
5403192 Kleinwaks et al. Apr 1995 A
5584701 Lampotang et al. Dec 1996 A
5668608 Lee Sep 1997 A
5769641 Lampotang et al. Jun 1998 A
5772442 Lampotang et al. Jun 1998 A
5779484 Lampotang et al. Jul 1998 A
5853292 Eggert et al. Dec 1998 A
5868579 Lampotang et al. Feb 1999 A
5882207 Lampotang et al. Mar 1999 A
5890908 Lampotang et al. Apr 1999 A
5900923 Prendergast et al. May 1999 A
5941710 Lampotang et al. Aug 1999 A
6042477 Addink Mar 2000 A
6157677 Martens et al. Dec 2000 A
6166744 Jaszlics et al. Dec 2000 A
6193519 Eggert et al. Feb 2001 B1
6220866 Amend et al. Apr 2001 B1
6241609 Rutgers Jun 2001 B1
6246975 Rivonelli et al. Jun 2001 B1
6257234 Sun Jul 2001 B1
6273728 van Meurs et al. Aug 2001 B1
6293519 Farretta Sep 2001 B1
6301339 Staples et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317165 Balram et al. Nov 2001 B1
6443735 Eggert et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461165 Takashina et al. Oct 2002 B1
6503087 Eggert et al. Jan 2003 B1
6527558 Eggert et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535714 Melker et al. Mar 2003 B2
6570563 Honda May 2003 B1
6608628 Ross et al. Aug 2003 B1
6692258 Kurzweil et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697451 Acharya et al. Feb 2004 B2
6747672 Haakonsen et al. Jun 2004 B1
6747674 Asami Jun 2004 B1
6758676 Eggert et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774855 Bateman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6774885 Even-Zohar Aug 2004 B1
6780016 Toly Aug 2004 B1
6921267 van Oostrom et al. Jul 2005 B2
7015954 Foote et al. Mar 2006 B1
7181690 Leahy et al. Feb 2007 B1
7190331 Genc et al. Mar 2007 B2
7259761 Shih et al. Aug 2007 B2
7367809 Takahashi May 2008 B2
7373377 Altieri May 2008 B2
7376903 Morita et al. May 2008 B2
7403664 Porikli et al. Jul 2008 B2
7728852 Suzuki et al. Jun 2010 B2
7728868 Razzaque et al. Jun 2010 B2
7787927 Wood et al. Aug 2010 B2
7815644 Masini Oct 2010 B2
7949616 Levy et al. May 2011 B2
8046408 Torabi Oct 2011 B2
8179412 Swanson May 2012 B2
8336777 Pantuso et al. Dec 2012 B1
8385687 Blais-Morin Feb 2013 B1
8398541 DiMaio et al. Mar 2013 B2
8520024 Guthrie et al. Aug 2013 B2
8902248 Bidarkar Dec 2014 B1
9020203 Dillavou Apr 2015 B2
20010026630 Honda Oct 2001 A1
20020049510 Oda et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030219146 Jepson Nov 2003 A1
20040009459 Anderson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040091845 Azerad et al. May 2004 A1
20040161731 Arington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040189701 Badt Sep 2004 A1
20040193441 Altieri Sep 2004 A1
20040260170 Wood et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050074154 Georgescu Apr 2005 A1
20050197818 Monfared et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203367 Ahmed et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203380 Sauer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050267778 Kazman Dec 2005 A1
20050273185 Teiwes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289472 Morita et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060187224 Ehrlich Aug 2006 A1
20070018975 Chuanggui et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070048702 Jang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055578 Ashton Mar 2007 A1
20070064098 Tran Mar 2007 A1
20070149290 Nickell et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070248261 Zhou et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080024594 Ritchey Jan 2008 A1
20080025640 Trudeau et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080055305 Blank et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080079752 Gates et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080123910 Zhu May 2008 A1
20080123927 Miga et al. May 2008 A1
20080158333 Krisbergh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231626 Mohamed et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080278633 Tsoupko-Sitnikov et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090058987 Thielman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090287089 Spector Nov 2009 A1
20090300122 Freer Dec 2009 A1
20100141555 Rorberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100226564 Marchesotti et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241953 Kim et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100295921 Guthrie et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100315418 Woo Dec 2010 A1
20110018959 Friel et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110084983 Demaine Apr 2011 A1
20110116703 Fu et al. May 2011 A1
20110135206 Miura et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110183182 Woehrle et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110188744 Sun Aug 2011 A1
20110216060 Weising et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110249029 Baumgart Oct 2011 A1
20110270135 Dooley et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120133786 Watanabe et al. May 2012 A1
20120201456 El-Mahdy et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120263154 Blanchflower et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120320157 Junuzovic et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120324332 Zaragoza et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130038632 Benton Feb 2013 A1
20130083063 Daniel Apr 2013 A1
20130308827 Dillavou et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140176533 Dillavou et al. Jun 2014 A1
20150002541 Dillavou et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
2008270883 Jan 2009 AU
2012295324 Mar 2014 AU
2694095 Jan 2009 CA
101405769 Apr 2009 CN
101743567 Jun 2010 CN
104011741 Aug 2014 CN
1804209 Jul 2007 EP
2163092 Mar 2010 EP
2742461 Jun 2014 EP
7420CHENP2009 Jul 2010 IN
05227463 Sep 1993 JP
2002074370 Mar 2002 JP
2007535875 Dec 2007 JP
2009134693 Jun 2009 JP
2010-508631 Mar 2010 JP
2010141476 Jun 2010 JP
2010-528354 Aug 2010 JP
2013-024298 Feb 2013 JP
582133 Dec 2012 NZ
621149 Dec 2015 NZ
9609722 Mar 1996 WO
0048475 Aug 2000 WO
0049475 Aug 2000 WO
2005119554 Dec 2005 WO
2006108279 Oct 2006 WO
2007059477 May 2007 WO
2009005901 Jan 2009 WO
2013025457 Feb 2013 WO
2013177125 Nov 2013 WO
2014105961 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (77)
Entry
Alex T. Pang et al: “Approaches to Uncertainty Visualization”, The Visual Computer, vol. 13, No. 8, Nov. 18, 1997, pp. 370-390.
Chong N Y et al: “A Collaborative Multi-site Teleoperation Over an ISDN”, Mechatronics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, GB, vol. 13, No. 8-9, Oct. 1, 2003, pp. 957-979.
Yonekura T et al: “Peer to Peer Networked Field-type virtual Environment by Using AtoZ”, Cyberworlds, 2004 International Conference on Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 18-20, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Nov. 18, 2004, pp. 241-248.
James Davis et al: “The Effects of Time Lag on Driving Performance and a Possible Mitigation”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 26, No. 3, Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 590-593.
Shenai Mahesh B et al: “Virtual Interactive Presence and Augmented Reality (VIPAR) for Remote Surgical Assistance”, Neurosurgery, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA, vol. 68, No. 3, Suppl. 3, Mar. 1, 2011, pp. 200-207.
Akatsuka, Compensation for End to End Delays in a VR System, Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Mar. 1998, pp. 156-159, IEEE.
So, Experimental Studies of the Use of Phase Lead Filters to Compensate Lags in Head-Coupled Visual Displays, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, Jul. 1996, pp. 445-454, vol. 26, No. 4.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Dec. 2, 2013 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/041967 filed on May 21, 2013 (Applicant—VIPAAR, LLC).
Newman et al. A Desk Supporting Computer-based Interaction with Paper Documents; Rank Xerox EuroPARC, United Kingdom, 1992 ACM 0-89791-513-5/92/0005-0587, pp. 587-592.
Greenberg, An Annotated Bibliography of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, SIGCHI Bulletin, Jul. 1991, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 29-62.
Ishii et al. ClearBoard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact, NTT Human Interface Laboraties, Kanagawa, Japan, 1992 ACM 0-89791-513-5/92/0005-0525, pp. 525-532, Exh. 705-706.
Takemura et al. Cooperative Work Environment Using Virtual Workspace, ATR Communication Systems Research Laboratories, Kyoto, Japan, 1992 ACM 0-89791-543-7/92/0226; CSCW 92 Proceedings, Nov. 1992, pp. 226-232.
Greenberg, CSCW '92 Formal Video Program, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, 1992, pp. 9-10.
Chang, et al., Design and Model for a Computer Supported Cooperative Environment for CASE and CAD Applications, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Auburn University, 1997 ACM 0-8971-925-4, pp. 191-198.
Kobayashi et al., DispLayers: Multi-Layer display Technique to Enhance Selective Looking of Overlaid Images, NTT Human Interface Laboraties, Kanagawa, Japan, p. 66.
Steitz et al., DOLPHIN: Integrated Meeting Support Across Local and Remote Desktop Environments and LiveBoards, IPSI—Integrated Publication and Information Systems Institute, GMD—German National Research Center for Computer Science, Conference Paper Oct. 1994, 1994 ACM 0-89791-xxx-x/xx/xxxx; pp. 1-14.
Ishii, et al., Beyond Videophones: Team WorkStation-2 for Narrowband ISDN, NTT Human Interface Laboratories, Japan; Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer supported Cooperative Work Sep. 13-17, 1993, Milan, Italy, ESCSW '93, pp. 325-326.
Ishii, et al., Integration of Interpersonal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments, NTT Human Interface Laboraties and University of California, Irvine, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 11, No. 4, Oct. 1993, pp. 349-375.
Yamazaki, et al., GestureLaser and GestureLaser Car, Devleopment of an Embodied Space to Support Remote Instruction, Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Sep. 12-16, 1999, Copehangen Denmark; 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 239-258.
Hayne, et al., Implementing Gesturing With Cursors in Group Support Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, Winter 1993-94, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 43-61.
Ishii et al., Iterative Design of Seamless Collaboration Media, Communications of the ACM, Aug. 1994, vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 83-97.
Ishii et al., Towawrd an Open Shared Workspace: Computer and Video Fusion Approach of Teamworkstation, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1991, vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 37-50.
Ishii, Integration of Shared Workspace and Interpersonal Space for Remote Collaboration, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 83-101.
Ishii, Translucent Multiuser Interface for Realtime Collaboration, IEICE trans. Fundamentals, vol. E75-A, No. 2 Feb. 1992, pp. 122-131.
DeVincezi, et al., Kinected Conference: Augmenting Video Imaging with Calibrated Depth and Audio, CSCW 2011, Mar. 19-23, 2011, Hangzhou, China, ACM 978-1-4503-0556-3/11/03, pp. 621-624.
Foreman, Managing Data in Distributed Multimedia Conferencing Applications, IEEE MultiMedia, Oct.-Dec. 2002, pp. 30-37.
Kuzuoka, Spatial Workspace Collaboration: A Sharedview Video Support System for Remote Collaboration Capability, Department of Mechano-Informatics, University of Tokyo, 1992 ACM 0-89791-513-5/92/005-0533, pp. 533-540.
Graves, et al. Supporting Learners in a Remote CSCL Environment: the Importance of Task and Communication, Dept. of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, 11 pgs.
Ishii, Position Paper for ECSCW '91 Workshop on Open CSCW Systems Toward an Open Shared Workspace: Computer and Video Fusion Approach of Team WorkStation, NTT Human Interface Laboratories, Kanagawa, Japan, 4 pgs.
Apperley, et al. Use of Video Shadow for Small Group Interaction Awareness on a Large Interactive Display Surface, The Computer Science Department, University of Waikato, New Zealand, 2002, Australian Computer Society, Inc., 10 pgs.
Kling, Cooperation, Coordination and Control in Computer-Supported Work, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1991, vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 83-88.
Rosenberg, Update on National Science Foundation Funding of the “Collaboratory”, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1991, vol. 34, No. 12, p. 83.
Norman, Collaborative Computing: Collaboration First, Computing Second, Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1991, vol. 34, No. 12, p. 88-90.
Pendergast, A Comparative Analysis of Groupware Application Protocols, ACM SIGCOMM, Computer Communication Review, pp. 28-40.
Press, Collective Dynabases, Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1992, vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 26-32.
Reeves et al., Supporting Communication Between Designers with Artifact-Centered Evolving Information Spaces, Department of Computer Science and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Color-401ado, 1992 ACM 0-89791-543-7/92/0010/0394, CSCW 92 Proceedings, Nov. 1992, pp. 394.
Tani et al., Courtyard: Integrating Shared Overview on a Large Screen and Per-User Detail on Individual Screens, Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1994 ACM 0-89791-650-6/94/0044, pp. 44-50.
Takemura et al., Cooperative Work Environment Using Virtual Workspace, ATR Communication Systems Research Laboratories, 1992 ACM 0-089791-543-7/92/0010/0226, CSCW 92 Proceedings, Nov. 1992, pp. 226-232.
Wellner, Interacting With Paper on the Digital Desk, Communication of the ACM, Jul. 1993, vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 87-96.
Wiberg, RoamWare: An Integrated Architecture for Seamless Interaction in Between Mobile Meetings, Department of Informatics, Umea University, Sweden, 2001 acm 1-58113-294-8/01/0009, pp. 288-297.
Veltman, Frontiers in Electronic Media, Interactions Jul. & Aug. 1997, pp. 32-66.
Fouss, et al., Classifying Groupware, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, 2000 ACM 1-58113-250-6/00/0004, pp. 117-124.
Mandviwalla et al., What Do Groups Need? A Proposed Set of Generic Groupware Requirements, 1994 ACM 1073-0516/94/0900-0245, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 1, No. 3, Sep. 1994, pp. 245-268.
Bly, et al., Media Spaces: Bringing People Together in a Video, Audio, and Computing Environment, Communications of the ACM, Jan. 1993, vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 27-47.
Ishii, et al., Integration of Inter-personal Space and Shared Workspace: ClearBoard Design and Experiments, NTT Human Interface Laboraties and University of California, Irvine, CSCW 92 Proceedings, Nov. 1992, pp. 33-42.
Anupam, et al., Collaborative Multimedia Scientific Design in SHASTRA, Department of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 12 pgs.
Allen, Groupware and social Reality, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Computers & Society, vol. 22, No. 1-4, Oct. 1992, pp. 24-28.
Hunter, et al., WaaZam! Supporting Creative Play at a Distance in Custo-1206mized Video Environments, CHI 2014, Apr. 26-May 1, 2014, Toronto, ACM 978-1-4503-2473-1/14/04, pp. 1197-1206.
Franck, et al., Putting Innovation to Work: Adoption Strategies for MultiMedia Communication Systems, Communication of the ACM, Dec. 1991, vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 53-63.
Gross, Recognizing and Interpreting Diagrams in Design, Division of Environmental Design and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, 1994 ACM 0-89791-733-2/94/0010, pp. 88-94.
Wann, et al. “Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments,” Vision Research 1995, 35 (19): p. 2731-2736.
Vogt, An AR System with Intuitive User Interface for Manipulation and Visualization of 3D Medical Data, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 2004, vol. 12, pp. 397-403, IOS Press.
Victor Theoktisto, Marta Fairen, “Enhancing collaboration in virtual reality applications”, Journal Computers and Graphics archive vol. 29 Issue 5, Oct. 2005 pp. 704-718.
Viciana-Abad, et al. “A preliminary study of presence in virtual reality training simulation for medical emergencies,” Medicinal Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 12, pp. 394-396 (2004).
U.S. Provisional Patent Appliaction Field dated May 18, 2007 by Barton Guthrie et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/930,874.
U.S. Provisional Appliaction Field dated Feb. 2, 2006 by Danny Murphy., U.S. Appl. No. 60/764,508.
U.S. Provisional Appliaction Field dated Nov. 11, 2005 by Danny Murphy., U.S. Appl. No. 60/735,458.
Taffinder, et al. “Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparascopic surgery: results from randomized controlled studies using the MIST VR laparascopic simulator,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 124-133 (1998).
Stafford, et al. “User evaluation of God-like interaction techniques,” Proc. 9th Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC2008), School of Computer and Information Science, University of South Australia, pp. 19-28.
Soler, et al. “Virtual reality, augmented reality and robotics in surgical procedures of the liver,” Th. M. Buzug and T.C. Lueth, editors. Perspectives in Image-guided Surgery, pp. 476-484 (2004).
Shuhaiber, J.H., “Augmented reality in surgery,” Arch Surg., vol. 139(2), pp. 170-174 (2004).
Satava, R.M., “Medical applications of virtual reality,” J. Med Systems, vol. 19, pp. 275-280 (1996).
Paul, et al. “Augmented virtuality based on stereoscopic reconstruction in multimodal image-guided neurosurgery: methods and performance evaluation,” IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005, 24 (11): p. 1500-1511.
Nishikawa, et al. “Mutual view sharing system for real-time telecommunication,” Systems and Computers in Japan, vol. 37(14), pp. 292-304 (2006).
Nicolau, et al.“An augmented reality system to guide radio-frequency tumour ablation,” Computer Animation and Virtual World (previously the Journal of Visualization & Computer Animation, vol. 16(1), pp. 1-10, 200 (2004).
Kurosaki, et al. “Skill transmission for hand positioning task through view-sharing system,” Graduate School oflnformation Science and Technology, Osaka University: p. 1-4.
Hamza-Lup, F.G., “A distrubuted augmented reality system for medical training and simulation,” Artcile Retrieved from the Internet. <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20070416201920/http://www.cs.ucf.edu/-ceh/Publ- ications/Papers/Content/Link04Hamza-LupRollandHughes.pdf> pp. 1-18, (2008).
Haluck, et al. Reliability and validity of endotower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. JD. Westwood et al. (Eds), Meidcine Meets Virtual Reality 2002, IOS Press: p. 1-6.
Gibson, et al. “Simulating surgery using volumetric object representations, real-time volume rendering and haptic feedback,” Mitsubishi Research Laboratories, pp. 1-21 (1997).
DeVincezi, et al., Kinected Conference: Augmenting Video Imaging with Calibrated Depth and Audio, CSCW 2011, Mar. 19-23, 2011, Hangzhou, China, ACM 978-M503-0556-3/11/03, pp. 621-624.
Danglemaier, et al. “Virtual and augmented reality support for discrete manufacturing system simulation,” Computers in Industry, vol. 56, pp. 371-383 (2005).
Birkfellner, et al. “Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted operating binocular,” Phys Med Biol 2003, 48 (3): p. N49-57.
Billinghurst, et al. “Real world teleconferencing,” IEEE Computer Graphics, vol. 22(6), pp. 11-13 (2002).
Billinghurst, et al. “Mixing realities in shared space: an augmented reality interface for collaborative computing,” Multimedia and Expo 2000, 3: p. 1641-1644.
Ballantyne, et al. “The da Vinci telerobotic surgical systems: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery,” Surg Clin North Am., vol. 83(6), pp. 1293-1304 (2003).
Alex T. Pang et al., “Approaches to Uncertainty Visualization”, The Visual Computer, vol. 13, No. 8, Nov. 18, 1997, pp. 370-390.
Ai, et al. “Tele-immersive medical educational environment,” University of Illinois at Chicago. VRMedLab, School of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, pp. 1-7, 2002.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150199823 A1 Jul 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13476712 May 2012 US
Child 14671615 US