The present invention relates generally to a system and method for minimizing lost circulation within subterranean reservoirs, and more particularly, to a system and method for determining a blend of lost circulation materials for application to drilling-induced subterranean fractures.
Unintended drilling induced fractures are known to increase operating costs and reduce efficiency of well operations. Fractures can cause well instability, well collapse, stuck drill pipes, costly pipe removal and maintenance, and non-productive well downtime. For example, over a typical one-year period, it is estimated that up to one-third of non-productive time can be attributed to lost circulation caused by unintended fracture formations. In addition, the cost of operating a well may increase significantly due to the need to replace drilling fluid and cement lost into the formation. An inability to properly treat and control such fracture formations may result in reservoir damage due to mud losses, and even the possibility of blow-outs due to inadequate hydrostatic pressures downhole.
To mitigate the effects of unintended fracture formations, so-called “lost circulation materials” are often used to seal or obstruct the fracture formations in subterranean reservoirs. Rig operators, for example, commonly use rough estimates of fracture size distributions and “rules of thumb” based on experience to determine the type, amounts and/or combinations of materials to apply to fractures. Such materials include may include cement, crushed walnuts and other synthetic materials that the operator determines to be appropriate for the well based on that operator's experience with the well.
A major shortcoming, however, is that the determination of the materials to be used is done without taking advantage of abstract rock properties and operational data, such as may be derived by reservoir modelers, to more accurately create an optimal concentrations and amounts of the products to be applied. In practice, operational personnel rarely delve into detailed reservoir modeling data, and regardless, have no tools to use such data to determined optimized blends of lost circulation products to be used. In addition, the range of product options and sizes available to operators are typically limited to those products used or manufactured by vendors or service providers supporting the drilling operations.
As such, a need exists to more effectively treat fracture formations in order to lower operational costs and increase drilling efficiency. In particular, a need exists in a planning phase to combine detailed reservoir modeling data with a robust range of lost circulation material product options in order to derive an optimal fill blend for a specific fracture or set of fractures.
A system is provided for minimizing lost circulation associated with the operation of a subterranean reservoir. The system includes a computer processor, one or more sources for providing data representative of the fracture formation in the reservoir, and a computer processor in communication with the one or more data sources, the computer processor having computer usable media programmed with computer executable code for determining a optimal blend of lost circulation products. The computer executable code includes a first program code for selecting, in accordance with the data representative of the fracture formation, a plurality of products for obstructing the fracture formation, and a second program code, in communication with the first program code, for mathematically determining an optimized blend of the selected products.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a computer-implemented method for minimizing lost circulation associated with the operation of a subterranean reservoir includes the steps of using data representative of the fracture formation to determine physical attributes of the fracture formation, selecting a plurality of products for obstructing the fracture formation, and determining a mathematically optimized blend of the selected products to be applied to the fracture formation. Physical attributes, for example, may include size, depth, orientation and fracturing potential. Based at least in part on the physical attributes, candidate products are selected from a list of available products. Concentrations of the selected products are then determined for application as a blended product to the fracture formation.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a computer program product is provided having computer usable media and computer readable program code embodied therein for using data representative of the fracture formation to determine physical attributes of the fracture formation, selecting a plurality of products for obstructing the fracture formation, and determining a mathematically optimized blend of the selected products to be applied to the fracture formation.
Advantageously, the systems, methods and computer program products of the present invention can be used to select, from a robust list of products, material products to be mixed into a mathematically optimized blend in order to more effectively minimize lost circulation associated with subterranean wells. The system utilizes rock properties, earth model data, and well operational data, to determine optimal concentrations of the selected products. The system can be used for well operation planning purposes so that the most appropriate materials and quantities thereof are made available to operators at the well location. By optimally selecting, blending and applying the materials, amounts of wasted materials can be greatly reduced and well efficiency greatly improved.
A detailed description of the present invention is made with reference to specific embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. The drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and therefore are not to be considered to be limiting of its scope.
a-h show user interfaces representative of a computer-implemented workflow for characterizing a fracture formation in accordance with the present invention;
a-d show user interfaces representative of a computer-implemented workflow for selecting a candidate list of products for minimizing lost circulation; and
a-c show user interfaces representative of a computer-implemented workflow for mathematically optimizing a blend of selected products for minimizing lost circulation.
The present invention may be described and implemented in the general context of instructions to be executed by a computer. Such computer-executable instructions may include programs, routines, objects, components, data structures, and computer software technologies that can be used to perform particular tasks and process abstract data types. Software implementations of the present invention may be coded in different languages for application in a variety of computing platforms and environments. It will be appreciated that the scope and underlying principles of the present invention are not limited to any particular computer software technology.
Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be practiced using any one or combination of computer processing system configurations, including but not limited to single and multi-processer systems, hand-held devices, programmable consumer electronics, mini-computers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by servers or other processing devices that are linked through a one or more data communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
Also, an article of manufacture for use with a computer processor, such as a CD, pre-recorded disk or other equivalent devices, could include a computer program storage media and program means recorded thereon for directing the computer processor to facilitate the implementation and practice of the present invention. Such devices and articles of manufacture also fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Referring now to the drawings, embodiments of the present invention will be described. The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including for example as a system (including a computer processing system), a method (including a computer implemented method), an apparatus, a computer readable media, a computer program product, a graphical user interface, a web portal, or a data structure tangibly fixed in a computer readable memory. Several embodiments of the present invention are discussed below. The appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of the present invention and therefore are not to be considered limiting of its scope and breadth.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the computer executable code 20 is designed and configured to implement the method 40 shown in
The software can be distributed, for example, as shown in
Steps 42 and 44 can be performed via a fracture characterization module 22, as shown in
In one embodiment of the present invention, the PROVIDUS system performs a fracture analysis using algorithms and methods known and appreciated by those with skill in the art. Fracture analysis data may include mechanical properties of the rock/formation in question, earth stresses (Sv, SH, and Sh), well depth, well orientation, drilling fluid temperature, and minimum and maximum pressures that the formation is exposed to (ESD and ECD respectively). Using methods known and appreciated in the art, PROVIDUS estimates wellbore pressures that will initiate formation fracturing, and size distribution of the fractures for a given over-pressure. PROVIDUS then uses the fracture data, along with stored product data, including data about products already in the fracture, to mathematically determine an optimized blend to be applied to the fracture.
Alternatively, earth model data 62 and fracture analysis data 70 can be provided to module 72 manually via an operator or automatically via a database or other data storage device in communication with module 72.
Steps 42 and 44 can also be performed as shown in
Alternatively, the software can provide suggestions for many standard rock types and locations if no other information is available. Rock mechanical parameters may include one or more of the following: tensile strength, unconfined compressive strength, internal friction angle, tectonic strain, linear thermal expansion coefficient, surface temperature, geothermal gradient, and seafloor temperature.
Next, as shown in
The operator then uses interface 102 as shown in
g shows the results of the fracture single point analysis 106, which in this example shows that rock failure is predicted 180. This means that fractures will open in the rock surrounding the wellbore and that drilling fluid will flow into these fractures. This flow, or so-called “losses,” can cause drilling problems, damage to equipment, well down-time, and increased expenses associated with replacement of the lost fluid.
Referring again to
a-d show user interfaces representative of a workflow for selecting a candidate list of products for minimizing lost circulation. Initially, as shown in the interface 200
Fracture D50≦Product D90 and Product D90≦2×Fracture D90 (Eq. 1)
If the product meets these criteria, then it is judged effective. The program goes further to evaluate if the total concentration of acceptable products is sufficient to stop the fluid losses into the formation. In performing the concentration evaluation, the program uses a predetermined minimum threshold amount, for example 8 pounds per barrel (lb/bbl), of effective bridging material required to stem the fluid losses. If a user selects a product, for example by clicking on a recommend button, and the concentration threshold is not satisfied, then the operator is notified via the pop-up window 250 of
Referring again to
In the case of a single additional product, as shown in
C1=Max.Allowed Concentration−ΣExisting Product Concentrations (Eq. 2)
where C1 is the concentration of product 1.
In the case of two additional products, as shown in
C1+C2=Max.Allowed Concentration−ΣExisting Product Concentrations D901C1+D902C2=D90Fracture×(C1+C2) (Eqs. 3 & 4)
This set of linear equations is solve through the Ax=b formula. Where A is the matrix on the left hand side of the equation, x is the solution vector, and b is the constants vector on the right hand side. This requires the equation to take the form of x=A−1b, which requires matrix inversion and then multiplication. This process is the same for two or three products.
If a third product is included, as shown in
C1+C2+C3=Max.Allowed Concentration−ΣExisting Product Concentrations
D901C1+D902C2+D903C3=D90Fracture×(C1+C2+C3)
D501C1+D502C2+D503C3=D50Fracture×(C1+C2+C3) (Eqs. 5, 6, 7)
The result of these Equations 5-7 is the concentration of products that the field personnel need to add to the fluid system to minimize losses.
As such, the system, method and computer product of the present invention are advantageous in that they include, in an integrated fashion, the steps of fracture modeling, lost circulation material product selection, and product blending.
Other embodiments of the present invention and its individual components will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing detailed description. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive. It is therefore not intended that the invention be limited except as indicated by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7499846 | Massingill et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7950472 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020040812 | Heying | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020099505 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030139916 | Choe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070007006 | Massingill et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080113879 | Way et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100250204 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |