1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of fluid dynamics and heat transfer, and more specifically to a system and method for mixing fluid streams within an industrial drying machine.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Industrial machines, such as those common in the textile, nonwovens and paper manufacturing industries, commonly utilize heated air to dry a newly formed product, as well for thermal bonding, curing and other processes that require an air stream with a uniform temperature profile. Typically, air is heated through conventional combustion means and then directed in various fashions towards the web of wet material. The heated air passes through or impinges the web, losing some of its heat in the drying process. The cooled air, referred to as system air, is then divided into portions that are re-circulated through the drying machine and portions that are exhausted into the atmosphere.
Drying machines in the aforementioned industries are generally of three types: through-air-dryers (TAD), impingement dryers, or floatation dryers. Each of these types of dryers is typically contained within a drying hood, which supplies and directs heated air to the surface of the web. A vacuum or pressure differential pulls the heated air through or onto the surface of the web and exhausts the cooled air into the system at large, at which point a portion of the cooled air will be exhausted into the atmosphere while the remainder is reused for drying applications. The direction of travel of the web is referred to as the machine direction, and the direction perpendicular to the machine direction and coplanar with the web is referred to as the cross-machine direction.
A typical dryer system 100 is shown in
The remaining system air is directed to an air heater 126 that combines the system air with combustion products from a burner 128. The burner 128 is driven by a combustion air source 130, such as a fan, and fuel 132. The mixed air 134 is a combination of combustion products and system air that will be used to dry the web passing through the dryer hood 112. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the combination of the system air and the combustion products will not necessarily produce a uniformly profiled stream of heated air. On the contrary, the introduction of a secondary stream of combustion products into the system air may produce non-homogenous profile for the mixed air 134. As a result, a typical dryer system 100 generally incorporates a static mixer 136 for inducing turbulence and mixing into the mixed air 134 stream so as to maximize thermal uniformity prior to entering the drying hood.
The foregoing example demonstrates both the strengths and weaknesses of the state of the art heating systems. While the current art is able to make remarkable use of system air through the re-circulation mechanisms, the necessary mixing of that air with combustion products is potentially hazardous to the end product. An essential aspect of textile and paper manufacturing is that the air that is drawn through or impinged upon the product must have a substantially uniform temperature profile along the cross-machine direction. Particularly for the manufacture of lightweight materials, such as tissue paper, any deviation in the temperature profile can irreversibly damage the finished product. The economic effects of non-uniform heating are multiple, including the energy required to replace the lost product, the costs of replacing the wasted raw materials, and the labor necessary to fix, maintain, manage and operate the dryer through a new production cycle. As such, one of the paramount concerns in the paper industry is designing a dryer that reliably maintains a uniform temperature profile in the cross-machine direction.
As noted above, it is common practice to re-circulate spent system air and reuse it in the drying cycle. Typically, the system air is combined with newly heated air and then the air is mixed as it passes through the machine ductwork towards the web of goods. Although the industry has made several attempts at efficiently re-circulating the air exhausted through the roll, the current state of the art requires a significant distance between the mixing point and the web in order to ensure that the temperature profile of the mixed stream is sufficiently homogenous.
For example, attempts have been made to introduce a heated fluid stream into a cooler fluid stream by using a baffling structure. Such a mechanism was contemplated in the invention described in international publication WO/0012202 published on Mar. 9, 2000. Although that invention describes a mechanical means for inducing turbulence, and hence mixing, in the combination of two fluid streams, it still does not do so with optimal efficiency of space and energy. In particular, the baffle design does create a large eddy that induces mixing of the fluid streams, but it does not do so in a symmetrical or uniform manner. Thus, the designers must either remix the turbulent air with a second device such as a static mixer; or alternatively, they must maximize the distance between the baffle location and the intake into the drying hood. Each of these two solutions involves non-trivial modifications to the drying systems described above, and both solutions would cost the producer in terms of energy efficiency and space utilization.
Given the foregoing, it is readily apparent to those skilled in the art that there is a need for a system and method for mixing fluid streams that is compact, energy efficient and produces a reliably uniform temperature profile across the web. Moreover, there is a need in the art for solutions that can be easily integrated into current drying system design without greatly expanding the hardware and space necessary to manufacture textiles. Lastly, there is a need in the art for a drying system that will minimize energy expenditures while deriving the greatest benefits from the raw materials processed therein.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a novel drying system that incorporates two-stage processes for heating air for drying a traveling web. In its various embodiments, the present invention operates within a system having a drying hood containing a dryer. The drying hood receives heated air through an intake and expels system air through an exhaust, a portion of which is directed into the atmosphere. In one embodiment, the portion of system air that is maintained in the system is divided into two portions and directed into separate parallel loops for two-stage heating that results in greater temperature uniformity and efficiency within the drying system.
The first portion of the system air is directed into a first conduit, and the second portion of the system air is directed into a second conduit. The first conduit includes an injection chamber that is disposed serially, or incorporated into, the drying hood intake. The second conduit includes a mixing chamber that is coupled to a burner for heating the air within the system.
The mixing chamber includes an arrangement of passages that effectively and efficiently mix the second portion of the system air with the combustion products from the burner. This mixed air stream is directed towards the injection chamber, where an injector or series of injectors induce further mixing by injecting the mixed air stream into the first portion of the system air. The injection chamber can also be integrated into the drying hood and controlled in such a manner so as to provide homogenous or non-homogenous air temperature across the running web, as determined by the user and the particular drying application.
By dividing the heating process into two stages, the present invention greatly increases the drying efficiency of a drying system. Notably, although one embodiment of the present invention utilizes a pair of distinct conduits for the heating process, the physical size of the drying system will not be affected. On the contrary, because of the increased mixing and heating efficiency of the present invention, it is possible to construct a drying system that is both smaller in size and more energy efficient that those presently used in the industry. Moreover, as described further below, the two-stage process of the present invention can also be utilized in a single conduit dryer configuration, in which the injection chamber is used for injecting an external source of heated air into the stream of mixed air from the mixing chamber. Numerous sources of external heated air, described below, can be utilized for improving the performance and efficiency of industrial dryers.
Further details and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent from the detailed description of the preferred embodiments that refers specifically to the following drawings.
The present invention includes both a system and method for mixing fluid streams, particularly those associated with contemporary drying systems. As described below, the present invention solves a number of problems noted in the textiles, paper and non-wovens industries. Most notably, the present invention includes a significant redesign of the drying system that efficiently utilizes system air and mixes it with combustion products in order to produce uniformly heated air for the web of goods. The mixing efficiencies of the present invention allow for a compact dryer design that is more economical in terms of raw materials, energy and space utilization.
Turning to
The exhaust 20 is coupled to a first air conduit 22 in circuitous communication with the exhaust 20 and the intake 48 and a second air conduit 24 in communication with the first air conduit 22. The air expelled through the exhaust 20 is referred to as system air, i.e. air that is not introduced from outside the system 10. The system air (not shown) is divided into a first portion 32 and a second portion 34, which are directed into the first conduit 22 and the second conduit 24, respectively.
A first fan 26 is part of the first air conduit 22 for receiving the first portion 32 of the system air and directing it through an injection chamber 46. A second fan 28 is part of the second air conduit 24 for receiving the second portion 34 of system air and directing it through to a mixing chamber 36. An exhaust port 30 is preferably disposed in the second conduit 24 for optionally expelling some of the second portion 34 of the system air into the atmosphere.
The mixing chamber 36 is adapted for receiving the second portion 34 of the system air and mixing it into combustion products 40 emanating from a burner 38, which is fed by a source of combustion air 41 and fuel 42. The combustion products 40 are too hot for direct introduction into the system 10. For example, the combustion products 40 may typically be between 1100 and 1550 degrees Celsius. Accordingly, the system 10 of the present invention introduces a two stage mixing process in order to efficiently temper the combustion products 40 into a readily usable stream of air heated to a range typically between 400 to 1500 degrees Celsius, i.e. a stream of mixed air 44.
The resulting mixed air 44 is directed towards the injection chamber 46, where it is injected back into the first portion 32 of the system air. After injection of the mixed air 44 into the first portion 32 of the system air, the intake 48 of the system 10 directs the uniformly profiled air into the dryer hood 14. The specific means for mixing and means for injection are discussed in detail below.
The exhaust 20 is coupled to a conduit 24′, which is in circuitous communication with the exhaust 20 and the intake 48. The air expelled through the exhaust 20 is still referred to as the system air. The system air (not shown) consists solely of a portion 34′, which is directed into the conduit 24′, as noted above.
A fan 26′ is part of the conduit 24′ for receiving the portion 34′ of system air and directing it through to a mixing chamber 36. An exhaust port 30 is preferably disposed in the conduit 24′ for optionally expelling some of the portion 34′ of the system air into the atmosphere.
As in the prior embodiment, the mixing chamber 36 is adapted for receiving the portion 34′ of the system air and mixing it into combustion products 40 emanating from a burner 38, which is fed by a source of combustion air 41 and fuel 42. As previously noted, the combustion products 40 are too hot for direct introduction into the system 10. Thus the system 10 of the present invention introduces another two stage mixing process in order to efficiently temper the combustion products 40 into a readily usable stream of air heated to a typical range of 150 to 600 degrees Celsius referred to as the stream of mixed air 44.
The resulting mixed air 44 is directed towards the injection chamber 46, where it receives an injection of heated air 45 from an external source 47. For purposes of the present invention, the heated air 45 may include air that is heated by a turbine, a second burner, exhaust from the machinery of the system 10, as well as certain types of naturally occurring volumes of air, such as those derived from geothermal processes. Thus as defined herein, the term external source 47 should be understood to refer to a source of heated air that is not derived from a burner located within the system 10. For example, the external source 47 may be typified as waste heat from another process or heat from another, lower cost source. Accordingly, the burner 42 used in the present invention can be smaller and more fuel efficient, thereby reducing the overall space and energy consumption associated with heating the air. As in previous embodiments, after injection of the heated air 45 into the mixed air 44, the intake 48 of the system 10 directs the uniformly profiled air into the dryer hood 14.
A volume is defined between the perforated sleeve 56 and the interior surface of the second passage 52, and the second portion 34 of the system air must of course occupy this volume as it passes through the perforated sleeve 56. In a preferred embodiment, the volume so defined is variable about the perforated sleeve 56, such that the pressure gradient along the surface of the perforated sleeve 56 will also be variable. For example, a volume along section 60 is greater than a volume along section 62, which in turn is greater than a volume along section 64. By varying the volume defining the intersection between the combustion product 40 and the second portion 34 of the system air, the designers can tailor the mixing rate of the two fluid streams as they form the mixed air 44.
The first tubular portion 74 and second tubular portion 75 cooperate to define an obtuse structure in the third passage 70 so as to create pockets of low pressure 77 in the flow of the first portion 32 of system air. The projections 73 defined by the first tubular portion 74 and second tubular portion 75 are purposefully obtuse in order to maximize the turbulence in the airflow and thereby induce mixing between the mixed air 44 and the first portion 32 of system air. A plurality of ports 78 (depicted as small arrows) are defined on the second tubular portion 75 for transmitting the mixed air 44 into the pockets of low pressure 77. The flow of mixed air 44 into the third passage 70 is controlled by at least one throttle valve 76 disposed between each of the first tubular portions 74 and second tubular portions 75. The throttle valves 76 are controllable by a system operator either mechanically or electronically, depending upon the configuration of the system 10.
As the manifolds 82 described herein are specifically designed to reduce turbulence in the system 10, the only turbulence created in a manifold-style injection chamber 46 is by the injection of the mixed air 44 into the first portion 32 of system air through the nozzles 84. It follows that in order to maximize the mixing activity of the two streams, each manifold 82 must have a number of nozzles 84 disposed thereon, preferably arranged in multiple rows and on both surfaces of the central portion 88. As the nozzle velocity of each nozzle 84 can be optimized for variable conditions, a system operator can fine-tune the mixing performance of the injection chamber 46 for particular needs.
One particular benefit of the manifold approach to fluid injection is that the temperature profile of the air entering the intake 48 can be readily controlled using a control loop for varying the injection rate of the manifolds 82. This increased control over the air profile near to or within the drying hood 14 allows for customized and optimized temperature control, which in turn permits engineers and manufacturers to develop improved goods at lower costs. Control over the manifolds 82 is precise enough that it is possible to dispose the injection chamber 46 close to, or even integrated into, the intake 48 of the drying hood 14. In particular, electronic control over the manifolds 82 permits a manufacturer to locate the injection chamber 46 at any point in the system 10 that is downstream from the mixing chamber 36, including of course integrating the injection chamber 46 into the drying hood 14.
By way of example,
For example, the manifolds 82 within the injection chamber 46 can be controlled to produce three streams of differing temperature, a first stream 200, a second stream 202 and a third stream 204. The nature of the feedback through the controller 49 ensures that the first stream 200 corresponds to the first zone 190, the second stream 202 to the second zone 192, and the third stream 204 to the third zone 204. Accordingly, the integration of the injection chamber 46 not only provides means for homogenizing the air temperature within the drying hood 14, it also provides means for biasing the air temperature within the drying hood 14 in a manner that is readily controllable. That is, the injection chamber 46 can be biased to inject hot air into an area correlating with a wet portion of the web 19, and conversely, the injection chamber 46 can be controlled to inject cooler air towards a dryer portion of the web 19. In short, by integrating the injection chamber 46 into the drying hood 14, the present invention enables users to optimize the drying of the web 19 in the most efficient manner.
The benefits of the present invention, in particular those achieved through the control over the manifolds 82 as well as the integration of the injection chamber 46 into the drying hood 14, result from the two-stage mixing processes described in detail above, which in turn reduces the length of the conduits necessary to direct the first portion 32 of the system air. Moreover, the usage of an external source, such as heated air from an ancillary process or machine, further lessens the costs associated with heating a uniform stream of air. As illustrated above, the present invention will enable engineers and designers to manufacture industrial dryers that utilize this process, which in turn will increase the drying efficiency of any number of commercial operations.
While the present invention has been described in detail with respect to its preferred embodiments, these should be understood to be exemplary in nature and not limiting as to the scope of the present invention. It is certain that design modifications could be readily devised by those skilled in the art, and that any such modifications would fall within the scope of the present invention as defined herein by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2210032 | Hess et al. | Aug 1940 | A |
2498506 | Ramser | Feb 1950 | A |
3303576 | Sisson | Feb 1967 | A |
4074441 | Helversen et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4103434 | Walker | Aug 1978 | A |
4133636 | Flynn | Jan 1979 | A |
4146361 | Cirrito et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4270283 | Ellis | Jun 1981 | A |
4328626 | Leitner | May 1982 | A |
4443185 | Smith | Apr 1984 | A |
4457087 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4481722 | Guy et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4881327 | Hauser et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5579072 | Frank et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5625962 | Fleissner | May 1997 | A |
5692371 | Varshay et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5784801 | Thorp et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5974691 | Marchal et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6071006 | Hochstein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6303003 | Webster | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6378226 | Fleissner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6551461 | Hermans et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6869506 | Jewitt | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6910283 | Reddy | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6953516 | Hermans et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6977028 | Ross et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20040099393 | Jewitt | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2395887 | Jun 2004 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070199202 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |