1. Field
The present disclosed embodiments relates generally to wireless communications, and more specifically to channel interleaving in a wireless communications system.
2. Background
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is a technique for broadcasting high rate digital signals. In OFDM systems, a single high rate data stream is divided into several parallel low rate substreams, with each substream being used to modulate a respective subcarrier frequency. It should be noted that although the present invention is described in terms of quadrature amplitude modulation, it is equally applicable to phase shift keyed modulation systems.
The modulation technique used in OFDM systems is referred to as quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), in which both the phase and the amplitude of the carrier frequency are modulated. In QAM modulation, complex QAM symbols are generated from plural data bits, with each symbol including a real number term and an imaginary number term and with each symbol representing the plural data bits from which it was generated. A plurality of QAM bits are transmitted together in a pattern that can be graphically represented by a complex plane. Typically, the pattern is referred to as a “constellation”. By using QAM modulation, an OFDM system can improve its efficiency.
It happens that when a signal is broadcast, it can propagate to a receiver by more than one path. For example, a signal from a single transmitter can propagate along a straight line to a receiver, and it can also be reflected off of physical objects to propagate along a different path to the receiver. Moreover, it happens that when a system uses a so-called “cellular” broadcasting technique to increase spectral efficiency, a signal intended for a received might be broadcast by more than one transmitter. Hence, the same signal will be transmitted to the receiver along more than one path. Such parallel propagation of signals, whether man-made (i.e., caused by broadcasting the same signal from more than one transmitter) or natural (i.e., caused by echoes) is referred to as “multipath”. It can be readily appreciated that while cellular digital broadcasting is spectrally efficient, provisions must be made to effectively address multipath considerations.
Fortunately, OFDM systems that use QAM modulation are more effective in the presence of multipath conditions (which, as stated above, must arise when cellular broadcasting techniques are used) than are QAM modulation techniques in which only a single carrier frequency is used. More particularly, in single carrier QAM systems, a complex equalizer must be used to equalize channels that have echoes as strong as the primary path, and such equalization is difficult to execute. In contrast, in OFDM systems the need for complex equalizers can be eliminated altogether simply by inserting a guard interval of appropriate length at the beginning of each symbol. Accordingly, OFDM systems that use QAM modulation are preferred when multipath conditions are expected.
In a typical trellis coding scheme, the data stream is encoded with a convolutional encoder and then successive bits are combined in a bit group that will become a QAM symbol. Several bits are in a group, with the number of bits per group being defined by an integer “m” (hence, each group is referred to as having an “m-ary” dimension). Typically, the value of “m” is four, five, six, or seven, although it can be more or less.
After grouping the bits into multi-bit symbols, the symbols are interleaved. By “interleaving” is meant that the symbol stream is rearranged in sequence, to thereby randomize potential errors caused by channel degradation. To illustrate, suppose five words are to be transmitted. If, during transmission of a non-interleaved signal, a temporary channel disturbance occurs. Under these circumstances, an entire word can be lost before the channel disturbance abates, and it can be difficult if not impossible to know what information had been conveyed by the lost word.
In contrast, if the letters of the five words are sequentially rearranged (i.e., “interleaved”) prior to transmission and a channel disturbance occurs, several letters might be lost, perhaps one letter per word. Upon decoding the rearranged letters, however, all five words would appear, albeit with several of the words missing letters. It will be readily appreciated that under these circumstances, it would be relatively easy for a digital decoder to recover the data substantially in its entirety. After interleaving the m-ary symbols, the symbols are mapped to complex symbols using QAM principles noted above, multiplexed into their respective sub-carrier channels, and transmitted.
a shows a channel interleaver in accordance with an embodiment;
b shows a channel interleaver in accordance with another embodiment;
a shows code bits of a turbo packet placed into an interleaving buffer in accordance with an embodiment;
b shows an interleaver buffer arranged into an N/m rows by m columns matrix in accordance with an embodiment;
In an embodiment, a channel interleaver comprises a bit interleaver and a symbol interleaver.
a shows a channel interleaver in accordance with an embodiment.
a shows Turbo coded bits 102 input into bit interleaving block 104. Bit interleaving block 104 outputs interleaved bits, which are input into constellation symbol mapping block 106. Constellation symbol mapping block 106 outputs constellation symbol mapped bits, which are input into constellation symbol interleaving block 108. Constellation symbol interleaving block 108 outputs constellation symbol interleaved bits into channelization block 110. Channelization block 110 interlaces the constellation symbol interleaved bits using an interlace table 112 and outputs OFDM symbols 114.
b shows Turbo coded bits 152 input into bit interleaving block 154. Bit interleaving block 154 outputs interleaved bits, which are input into constellation symbol mapping block 156. Constellation symbol mapping block 15 outputs constellation symbol mapped bits, which are input into channelization block 158. Channelization block 158 channelizes the constellation symbol interleaved bits using an interleaved interlace table and dynamic slot-interlace mapping 160 and outputs OFDM symbols 162.
Bit Interleaving for Modulation Diversity
The interleaver of
a shows code bits of a turbo packet 202 placed into an interleaving buffer 204 in accordance with an embodiment.
For simplicity, a fixed m=4 may be used, if the highest modulation level is 16 and if code bit length is always divisible by 4. In this case, to improve the separation for QPSK, the middle two columns are swapped before being read out. This procedure is depicted in
In another embodiment, as a first step, the code bits of a turbo packet 202 are distributed into groups. Note that the embodiments of both
Interleaved Interlace
In accordance with an embodiment, the channel interleaver uses interleaved interlace for constellation symbol interleaving to achieve frequency diversity. This eliminates the need for explicit constellation symbol interleaving. The interleaving is performed at two levels:
It would be apparent to those skilled in the art that the number of subcarriers can be other than 500. It would also be apparent to those skilled in the art that the number of interlaces can be other than eight.
Note that since 500 is not power of 2, a reduced-set bit reversal operation shall be used in accordance with an embodiment. The following code shows the operation:
where n=500, m is the smallest integer such that 2m>n which is 8, and bitRev is the regular bit reversal operation.
The symbols of the constellation symbol sequence of a data channel is mapped into the corresponding subcarriers in a sequential linear fashion according to the assigned slot index, determined by the Channelizer, using the interlace table as is depicted in
In an embodiment, one out of the eight interlaces is used for pilot, i.e., Interlace 2 and Interlace 6 is used alternatively for pilot. As a result, the Channelizer can use seven interlaces for scheduling. For convenience, the Channelizer uses Slot as a scheduling unit. A slot is defined as one interlace of an OFDM symbol. An Interlace Table is used to map a slot to a particular interlace. Since eight interlaces are used, there are then eight slots. Seven slots will be set aside for use for Channelization and one slot for Pilot. Without loss of generality, Slot 0 is used for the Pilot and Slots 1 to 7 are used for Channelization, as is shown in
The number surrounded with a square is the interlace adjacent to the pilot and consequently with good channel estimate. Since the Scheduler always assigns a chunk of contiguous slots and OFDM symbols to a data channel, it is clear that due to the inter-interlace interleaving, the contiguous slots that are assigned to a data channel will be mapped to discontinuous interlaces. More frequency diversity gain can then be achieved.
However, this static assignment (i.e., the slot to physical interlace mapping table1 does not change over time) does suffer one problem. That is, if a data channel assignment block (assuming rectangular) occupies multiple OFDM symbols, the interlaces assigned to the data channel does not change over the time, resulting in loss of frequency diversity. The remedy is simply cyclically shifting the Scheduler interlace table (i.e., excluding the Pilot interlace) from OFDM symbol to OFDM symbol.
However, it is noticed that slots are assigned four continuous interlaces with good channel estimates followed by long runs of interlaces with poor channel estimates in contrast to the preferred patterns of short runs of good channel estimate interlaces and short runs of interlaces with poor channel estimates. In the figure, the interlace that is adjacent to the pilot interlace is marked with a square. A solution to the long runs of good and poor channel estimates problem is to use a shifting sequence other than the all one's sequence. There are many sequences can be used to fulfill this task. The simplest sequence is the all two's sequence, i.e., the Scheduler interlace table is shifted twice instead of once per OFDM symbol. The result is shown in
To simplify the operation at both transmitters and receivers, a simple formula can be used to determine the mapping from slot to interlace at a given OFDM symbol time
i=′{(N−((R×t)%N)+s−1)%N}
where
In an embodiment, I=8, R=2. The corresponding Slot-Interlace mapping formula becomes
i=′{(7−((2×t)%7)+s−1)%7}
where ′ corresponds to the following table:
1The Scheduler slot table does not include the Pilot slot.
2OFDM symbol index in a superframe instead of in a frame gives additional diversity to frames since the number of OFDM symbols in a frame in the current design is not divisible by 14.
This table can be generated by the following code:
where m=3 and bitRev is the regular bit reversal operation.
For OFDM symbol t=11, Pilot uses Interlace 6. The mapping between Slot and Interlace becomes:
The resulting mapping agrees with the mapping in
In accordance with an embodiment, an interleaver has the following features:
The bit interleaver is designed to taking advantage of m-Ary modulation diversity by interleaving the code bits into different modulation symbols;
The “symbol interleaving” designed to achieve frequency diversity by INTRA-interlace interleaving and INTER-interlace interleaving;
Additional frequency diversity gain and channel estimation gain are achieved by changing the slot-interlace mapping table from OFDM symbol to OFDM symbol. A simple rotation sequence is proposed to achieve this goal.
Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The present application for patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/592,999 entitled “METHOD OF CHANNEL INTERLEAVING IN AN OFDM WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM” filed Jul. 29, 2004, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein. The present Application for patent is related to the following co-pending U.S. patent applications: “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FREQUENCY DIVERSITY” having U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/192,789, filed Jul. 29, 2005, assigned to the assignee hereof, and expressly incorporated by reference herein; and “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TIME DIVERSITY” having U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/193,053, filed Jul. 29, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,583,584, assigned to the assignee hereof, and expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5177766 | Holland et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5315592 | Conant et al. | May 1994 | A |
5943330 | Hottinen | Aug 1999 | A |
6145111 | Crozier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154484 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6172993 | Kim et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208663 | Schramm et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243379 | Veerina et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298463 | Bingeman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304581 | Chen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311306 | White et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6392572 | Shiu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421333 | Jalali | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6505052 | Jou | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6580497 | Asaka et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597726 | Ozluturk | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611551 | Jones, IV et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6667962 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697990 | El-Gamal et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6738370 | Ostman | May 2004 | B2 |
6747948 | Sarraf | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754170 | Ward | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6956842 | Okumura et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961388 | Ling et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973118 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7002900 | Walton et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031251 | Chen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039000 | You et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093185 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7120696 | Au et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7145940 | Gore et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154936 | Bjerke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170849 | Arivoli et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7248652 | Sayeed | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251282 | Maltsev et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251768 | Giannakis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289459 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292552 | Willenegger et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298787 | Priotti | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7324590 | Abrishamkar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339999 | Gore et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7411898 | Erlich et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7457350 | Baker et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7583584 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7693124 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8391410 | Wang | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020122383 | Wu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020167924 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030007466 | Chen | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030142730 | Lin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174686 | Willenegger et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040199846 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203885 | Quaid | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218570 | Black et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050016201 | Ivanov et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050122928 | Vijayan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135308 | Vijayan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135517 | Coffey et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050195763 | Kadous et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060109781 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117167 | Evrard et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123310 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133388 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060209927 | Khandekar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215538 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060280228 | Daniele et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025738 | Moore | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036065 | Wang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070081484 | Wang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082696 | Wang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070232251 | Murthy et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080317142 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090161776 | Wang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20130156124 | Wang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007300037 | Apr 2008 | AU |
1345493 | Apr 2002 | CN |
1348310 | May 2002 | CN |
0938208 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1222828 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1304812 | Apr 2003 | EP |
09261209 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10210000 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000013356 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000031838 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000068975 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2001217861 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001268048 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001320345 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001339657 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002057640 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002111621 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002111631 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002217894 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003124904 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003518816 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003188848 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003521842 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003524929 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003309535 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004032711 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004048676 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004133801 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005536097 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006504366 | Feb 2006 | JP |
20010088148 | Sep 2001 | KR |
2004-61482 | Jul 2004 | KR |
211474 | Feb 1989 | NZ |
503592 | Feb 2002 | NZ |
2134017 | Jul 1999 | RU |
2137310 | Sep 1999 | RU |
2178953 | Jan 2002 | RU |
2003109329 | Jan 2005 | RU |
1327296 | Jul 1987 | SU |
I228893 | Mar 2005 | TW |
I237511 | Aug 2005 | TW |
I244349 | Nov 2005 | TW |
0035102 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0034799 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0036208 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0049780 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0065726 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0074248 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0105059 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0147157 | Jun 2001 | WO |
02065647 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02099994 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03058823 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03079576 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004015948 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004038987 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004039027 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004082200 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2005022797 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005043829 | May 2005 | WO |
2005076558 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005076641 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005114940 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006016212 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006069319 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006086878 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006099222 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006099326 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2008039952 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2009015330 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Eroz et al, “On the Design of Prunable Interleavers for Turbo Codes”, 1999, pp. 1669-1673. |
Arshad K et al: “Performance of Wireless OFDM System Channel Estimation with Different Pilot Patterns” Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, 2004 IEEE Eighth International Symposium on Sydney, Australia Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Aug. 30, 2004, pp. 179-183, XP010754933. |
Comsa C et al: “System level design of baseband OFDM for wireless LAN” Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2003. SCS 2003. International Symposium on Jul. 10-11, 2003, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, vol. 1, Jul. 10, 2003, pp. 313-316, XP010654936. |
Muramatsu et al.:“Perfect reconstruction deinterlacer banks for field scalable video compression,” International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2279-2282, XP010786240 (2004). |
Parthasarathy et al.: “Reliable transmission of high-quality video over ATM networks,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 8, No. 3, XP011026288 (Mar. 1999). |
Zhongren Cao et al.: “Efficient Structure-Based Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation for Interleaved OFDMA Uplink,” IEEE, pp. 3361, XP-010643069, 2003. |
Tia: “Forward Link Only Air Interface Specification” Rev. 1.1, Physical Layer, FLO Forum Technical Contribution to TR47, Dec. 22, 2005, pp. 5-8 to 5-24. |
International Search Report—PCT/US05/027105, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Nov. 29, 2005. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US2005/027105, International Searching Authority—European Patent Office—Nov. 29, 2005. |
Patterson & Hennessey, “Computer Organization and Design” 1994, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Figurre 5.11 and description thereof and discussion, pp. 280-285. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW096136065—TIPO—Jan. 31, 2011. |
FLO Forum, “Forward Link Only Air Interface Specification Rev. 1.1”, FLO Forum Technical Contribution to TR47, pp. 1-1 to 6-2, Dec. 22, 2005. |
Forward Link Only Air Interface Specification for Terrestrial Mobile Multimedia Multicast; TIA-1099 EIA/TIA Standards, Telecommunications Industry Associations, Arlington, VA, US, Aug. 2006, XP017005609. |
Murali R Chari et al: “FLO Physical Layer: An Overview” IEEE transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 53, No. 1, Mar. 1, 2007, pp. 145-160, XP011172013, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, Issn: 0018-9316, Abstract; Figures 8,11,13, Sections IV.C.4), IV.C.8), IV.C.9 Standards. |
Nevdyaev, L.M., Telecommunication Technologies, Moscow, Communication and Business, 2002, p. 347. |
Hill “A First Course on Coding Theory”, 1986 Oxford University Press, Chapter 2, pp. 11-13. |
Daza V., et al., “A Distributed and Computationally Secure Key Distribution Scheme”, Information Security, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2433, 2002, pp. 342-356. |
Takahashi, Y., “Image Information Media towards the 21st Century,” Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Japan, The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Jan. 2000, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 14-20. |
Li Y., “Pilot-symbol-aided channel estimation for OFDM in wireless systems”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 49, No. 4, Jul. 2000, ISSN: 0018-9545, INSPEC Accession Number: 6751663, DOI: 10.1109/25.875230, pp. 1207-1215. |
Notification of the First Office Action from Chinese Patent Office date Oct. 17, 2014 for the corresponding Chinese patent application No. 201210524314.2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060123310 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60592999 | Jul 2004 | US |