The present application generally relates to systems and methods for monitoring spatial orientation and motion of a mobile device.
Business and individuals today rely on mobile computing products/arrangements (“MCPs”, e.g., bar code readers, PDAs, laptops, two-way pagers, mobile phones, digital cameras, mobile optical readers) in a multitude of situations ranging from basic everyday tasks to highly specialized procedures. As the virtues and benefits of utilizing MCPs continue to be realized across increasingly diverse industries, the features and capabilities of these products are expanding at a correspondingly rapid pace. In many industries, MCPs have gone from fashionable accessories to essential business components used by all levels of personnel.
Accordingly, a great need has developed for MCPs to perform complicated tasks quickly, efficiently and reliably. However, as conventional MCPs are fitted with more advanced gadgetry and software features, sacrifices are often made with respect to user-friendliness and operational efficiency. While many methods have been devised attempting to resolve these difficulties, MCPs currently continue to suffer from problems of complicated operational procedures, requiring manual input.
In the ongoing search for solutions to these problems, one aspect of MCPs that has remained overlooked is a product's kinetic state. From an MCP's motions, valuable information may be extracted from which various predetermined procedures may be executed. Therefore, it is desirable to be able to detect, interpret and utilize the movements experienced by MCPs.
Described is a system and method for monitoring a mobile device. The device comprises a plurality of sensors and a processor. The sensors detect first data including spatial orientation data and motion data of the device, and the processor compares the first data to second data to determine an occurrence of an event related to at least one of a communications functionality and a power setting of the device. The second data includes predetermined threshold ranges of changes in the spatial orientation data and the motion data. If the event is detected, the processor selects a predetermined procedure for execution as a function of the first data and executes the predetermined procedure.
a shows an exemplary embodiment of a mobile computing product/arrangement used in a near-field modality according to the present invention.
b shows an exemplary embodiment of a mobile computing product/arrangement used in a far-field modality according to the present invention.
The present invention may be further understood with reference to the following description and the appended drawings, wherein like elements are provided with the same reference numerals. The present invention relates to an MCP which includes at least one sensor that monitors the MCP's spatial orientation and motion. In particular, the sensor(s) may measure the MCP's acceleration, velocity, angular velocity/acceleration in any direction, orientation with respect to the user or any other motion to which the MCP may be subjected. These measurements may be contrasted with prerecorded motion patterns or predefined levels of motion. As will be described below, predetermined procedures may then be executed in response to the orientation/motion for adjusting functionality of the MCP.
The WLAN 40 may use a version of the IEEE 802.11 or a similar protocol. One benefit of using a version of the IEEE 802.11 standard is that existing infrastructures using that standard may be adapted to support the system with minimal modifications. With only a simple software upgrade, most MCPs 20 supporting that standard may operate according to the present invention. In alternative exemplary embodiments, different wireless protocols or technologies (e.g., Bluetooth, WWAN, WPAN, infrared, cellular, etc.) may also be utilized.
Referring back to the mobile network 100, the AP 10 may be, for example, a router, switch or bridge that forms the connection between the WLAN 40 and the communications network 50. Coupled to the WLAN 40 is the MCP 20 and coupled to the communications network 50 are the server 60 and the client computer 70. The communications network 50 is utilized to transmit data between the various components of the mobile network 100. This communications network 50 can be any network usable to transmit data, such as between microprocessors, and may be a local area network (“LAN”), a wide area network (“WAN”), a PSTN or the Internet. When the communications network 50 includes the Internet, the range of the MCP 20 can be essentially unlimited, as long as the AP 10 connected to the communications network 50 is within range of the MCP 20. Therefore, the AP 10 does not have to physically be in the vicinity of the server 60 or the client computer 70, as it may be remotely located by extending network cabling or through the Internet.
The MCP 20 may be any type of computer or processor based mobile device which may include a laser-/imager-based scanner, an RFID reader, a PDA, a laptop, a two-way pager, a mobile phone, a digital camera, a portable media player, etc. Since the MCP 20 is portable, it is capable of connecting to a wireless network, and is sufficiently small to be easily carried. The MCP 20 may be designed for specific purposes, such as reading barcodes, or may be a handheld device with different purposes, to which various functionalities have been added through separate software modules. In one exemplary embodiment, the MCP 20 is based on a multi-purpose personal digital assistant (“PDA”) such as those running the Microsoft Pocket PC 2003 operating system, or similar.
In the exemplary embodiment of
The sensors 120 may be any type of measurement devices capable of monitoring spatial orientation and motion, and may be based on, for example, a G-shock sensor, a switch, an accelerometer, a strain gage, a piezo, MEMS technologies, or combinations of the like. The spatial orientation may include any angular movement with respect to at least one axis in the three-dimensional reference frame of the MCP 20. The motion may include, for example, a velocity value, an acceleration value, an angular acceleration/velocity value, etc. Although the sensors 120 may be of any size, they are preferably small enough so that any added weight and space occupied on the MCP 20 is negligible. Because the MCP 20 usually operates on batteries, the sensors 120 should preferably have a low power consumption. In addition, the sensors 120 should preferably be durable enough to withstand the abusive environments.
The sensors 120 detect changes in the spatial orientation and motion of the MCP 20 and generate the first data. The first data is provided to the processor 110 which compares the first data to predetermined second data which includes threshold ranges and/or values. For example, the second data may be a prerecorded rotation of the MCP 20 by ninety degrees, the detection of which may indicate of the occurrence of an event. The second data may be a threshold range of 90° angle intervals and or a 90° max angle so that when the first data indicates that the MCP 20 has rotated more than 90°, the MCP 20 selects and executes a particular predetermined procedure.
The first data may be retained for each instance where the measurements of the sensors 120 are outside of the threshold ranges or greater than the value, which would be indicative of an event. The processor 110 may also append additional information to the retained first data including sequential numbering of the events, time and date for each event, acceleration data, data corresponding to a status of the MCP 20 at the date/time of the event, environmental factors, etc.
In the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the MCP 20 selectively activates mobile communications capabilities based on a comparison of the first data and the second data. As described above, the MCP 20 may be usable as a mobile phone having full-duplex and/or half-duplex modes. In the full-duplex mode, the MCP 20 may be used as a conventional mobile phone and being held close to the user (as a telephone handset) so that the user can talk and listen simultaneously, as shown in
In contrast, the MCP 20 may also be used in the half-duplex mode as a walkie-talkie (e.g., a push-to-talk (PTT) mode). When used as a walkie-talkie, the MCP 20 is typically held at a distance from the user, as shown in
In the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the first data generated by the sensors 120 is used by the MCP 20 to switch between the near-field and far-field modalities, as well as activating and deactivating the mobile communications functionality and/or the MCP 20. For example, when the first data is indicative of the MCP 20 being held as the telephone handset, the near-field modality is activated. When the first data is indicative of the MCP 20 being held as the walkie-talkie, the far-field modality is activated (and the near-field modality deactivated). Additionally, the MCP 20 may activate the mobile communications functionality (and, optionally, itself) when the first data indicates the MCP 20 is in use (or the user is holding the MCP 20 for intended use) and deactivate the mobile communications functionality (and, optionally, itself) when the first data indicates non-use (e.g., hooked to a user's belt, at his side, motionless, etc.).
The foregoing embodiments of the mobile network 100 and the MCP 20 are not to be construed so as to limit the present invention in any way. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, different types of the MCP 20 may be used to communicate over the same data network, as long as they work under compatible protocols.
In the step 320, the sensors 120 continuously monitor the MCP 20 for changes in the spatial orientation and/or motion/movements that may constitute the occurrence of a predefined event. An event may include, for example, the MCP 20 being rotated, lifted, put down, inverted, remaining still for a specified duration, etc. Whenever the MCP 20 experiences detectable motion or an extended lack thereof, the first data is generated. The sensors 120 may make no effort to differentiate between or prioritize directional orientation or motion values, returning all results to the processor 110 for processing.
In the step 330, the processor 110 compares the first data with the second data. If the characteristics of the first data match those of the second data, the processor 110 determines that an event has occurred and a corresponding predetermined procedure needs to be selected. At the occurrence of an event, the processor 110 may also attach to the first data at least one additional data of a time/date of each event, a status of the MCP 20, a direction of the acceleration, environmental data, etc. The additional data may be reviewed and used to further refine the second data. For example, if the MCP 20 does not effectively switch between the near- and far-filed modalities, the second data may be adjusted based on the recorded first data.
Due to practical considerations (e.g., memory limitations and processing power) and because not all event occurrences may be significant, the reporting and recording of all movements of the MCP 20 no matter how minor, although possible, may in some instances be impractical. Movements within predefined ranges may not correspond to any of the predefined events and, thus, have no bearing on applications of the present invention. For example, if the user reorients the MCP 20 to focus a laser-line on a bar code, movements corresponding to the reorientation would not register as one of the predefined events. That is, the reorientation would have no affect on the mobile communications functionality of the MCP 20. Therefore, in the step 340, the first data is measured against the threshold values/ranges contained in the second data. The first data may only be retained when at least one event and/or reading satisfies the threshold values/ranges or matches the prerecorded motions of the second data. Otherwise, the first data may be discarded and the method 300 is returned to the step 320 for the monitoring of new events.
If the first data corresponds to one of the events indicated by the second data, the method 300 continues to the step 350 where the processor 110 selects, as a function of the first data, at least one predetermined procedure for execution. In particular, the processor 110 analyzes the first data and determines the corresponding procedure of the plurality of predetermined procedures. In the exemplary embodiment, the plurality of predetermined procedures may include, but is not limited to, activating/de-activating the near- or far-field modality, activating/de-activating the mobile communications functionality of the MCP 20, activating/de-activating the MCP 20 itself, adjusting power settings of the mobile communications components of the MCP 20 (e.g., entering power-save or wake mode), etc.
In the step 360, the predetermined procedure is executed. For example, when the first data indicates that the MCP 20 is being held as a telephone handset, the MCP 20 may activate the mobile communications functionality and the near-field modality. When the first data indicates that the MCP 20 is held at the user's side, the MCP 20 may de-activate the mobile communications functionality and/or itself.
From the description of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, one of skill in the art would understand that the sensors 120 allow the MCP 20 to enable/disable particular functionality automatically based on movement of the MCP 20. For example, if the MCP 20 indicates that there is an incoming call, instead of pushing a button to accept the call, the user may simply raise the MCP 20 to his ear (like a telephone handset). Upon sensing that motion, the MCP 20 may enable the near-field modality, accepting the call. Similarly, pulling the MCP 20 away from his ear may end the call.
The present invention has been described with the reference to the above exemplary embodiments. One skilled in the art would understand that the present invention may also be successfully implemented if modified. Accordingly, various modifications and changes may be made to the embodiments without departing from the broadest spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings, accordingly, should be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3609898 | Brown | Oct 1971 | A |
3630476 | Lococo | Dec 1971 | A |
3854685 | Parduhn | Dec 1974 | A |
4067523 | Kenny et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4583311 | Hosey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4791540 | Dreyer, Jr. et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4862298 | Genheimer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4883341 | Whitehead | Nov 1989 | A |
4903172 | Schoniger et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907773 | Menchetti et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4947300 | Wen | Aug 1990 | A |
4994941 | Wen | Feb 1991 | A |
5148153 | Haymond | Sep 1992 | A |
5224770 | Simmons et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227929 | Comerford | Jul 1993 | A |
5235472 | Smith | Aug 1993 | A |
5276916 | Pawlish et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5373213 | Smith | Dec 1994 | A |
5392290 | Brown et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436838 | Miyamori | Jul 1995 | A |
5441300 | Yokota et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5490411 | Hogan | Feb 1996 | A |
5521772 | Lee et al. | May 1996 | A |
RE35269 | Comerford | Jun 1996 | E |
5536930 | Barkan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537270 | Morehouse et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546687 | Iorfida | Aug 1996 | A |
5740471 | Terui | Apr 1998 | A |
5790490 | Tatsuya et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835298 | Edgerton | Nov 1998 | A |
5842297 | Tung | Dec 1998 | A |
5957564 | Bruce et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982573 | Henze | Nov 1999 | A |
6023869 | Durbin | Feb 2000 | A |
6024462 | Whitehead | Feb 2000 | A |
6052641 | Wuerth et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6076294 | Durbin | Jun 2000 | A |
6079844 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094849 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6181380 | Toyofuku et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215409 | Blach | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237883 | Levin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246862 | Grivas et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283375 | Wilz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290134 | Rando et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330497 | Obradovich et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6411828 | Lands et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457134 | Lemke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6508563 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6539656 | Maas et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570726 | Mutoh | May 2003 | B2 |
6604840 | Watson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6664744 | Dietz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676284 | Willson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6707581 | Browning | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6846089 | Stevenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857212 | Velez | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871982 | Holman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6937281 | Ogawa | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956564 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6969034 | Were et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7024031 | Castellanos-Nolasco et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7102626 | Denny, III | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7251094 | Miyano | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289102 | Hinckley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301529 | Marvit et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305146 | Cheatle | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7389933 | Wang | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401300 | Nurmi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7432911 | Skarine | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440847 | Unuma et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7498951 | Wardimon | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539576 | Ohnishi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7611061 | Steele et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7619686 | Tom | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655331 | Adams et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7769542 | Calvarese et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010013854 | Ogoro | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020021278 | Hinckley et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020043561 | Tsikos et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055861 | King et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109782 | Ejima et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111737 | Hoisko | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165662 | Maruyama et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186878 | Hoon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030079387 | Derose | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093216 | Akiyama | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105983 | Brakmo et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122804 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134657 | Norta et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139205 | Belcher et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144793 | Melaku et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234797 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234979 | Poo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040036712 | Cardno | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040193369 | Kokojima et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201595 | Manchester | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203897 | Rogers | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204125 | Messel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212586 | Denny, III | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216343 | Golding | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226209 | Ayala | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245334 | Sikorski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266480 | Hjelt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050060088 | Helal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072032 | McCollum et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113124 | Syrjarinne et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050127258 | Lapointe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154798 | Nurmi | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175282 | Wright et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183118 | Wee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050219552 | Ackerman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222801 | Wulff et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060052109 | Ashman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114244 | Saxena et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070057067 | He | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070257836 | Chaplin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2447281 | Oct 2003 | CA |
1278348 | Dec 2000 | CN |
1869863 | Nov 2006 | CN |
0377309 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 564 160 | Oct 1993 | EP |
1355223 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1617629 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2310525 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2361989 | Nov 2001 | GB |
2420620 | May 2006 | GB |
04-268254 | Sep 1992 | JP |
6350895 | Dec 1994 | JP |
08-043425 | Feb 1996 | JP |
09-134216 | May 1997 | JP |
09-218446 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2000-253141 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002-033793 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-259066 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-343074 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2005-241331 | Sep 2005 | JP |
9313604 | Jul 1993 | WO |
9821520 | May 1998 | WO |
9922338 | May 1999 | WO |
9939319 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0118776 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0179748 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2004057595 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005101028 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005103863 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006028514 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007016181 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007149747 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 2, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/478,963, Thomas Wulff, filed Jun. 28, 2006. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/071089 issued on Jan. 6, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/071089 issued on Dec. 18, 2007. |
Pedestrian Tracking with Shoe-Mounted Inertial Sensors by Eric Foxlin—IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Nov./Dec. 2005. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Apr. 5, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/624,327, Russell Calvarese, filed Jan. 18, 2007. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/624,327, Russell Calvarese, filed Jan. 18, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 15, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,488, Michael Steele, filed Sep. 22, 2006. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 19, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,488, Michael Steele, filed Sep. 22, 2006. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action mailed on Jun. 27, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,488, Michael Steele, filed Sep. 22, 2006. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 7, 2009 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800350013. |
Office Action mailed on Sep. 1, 2010 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800350013. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 23, 2011 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800350013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/029066 issued on Jan. 29, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/029066 mailed on Jul. 12, 2006. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/471,979, Michael Iverson, filed Jun. 21, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/070979 mailed on Nov. 20, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/070979 issued on Dec. 22, 2008. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 2, 2011 in Chinese Patent Application No. 200780028587.5. |
Office Action mailed on May 11, 2009 in European Patent Application No. 07798429.2. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 5, 2010 in European Patent Application No. 07798429.2. |
Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/748,992, Steven Moris Sikorski, filed Dec. 29, 2003. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/748,992, Steven Moris Sikorski, filed Dec. 29, 2003. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 1, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/748,992, Steven Moris Sikorski, filed Dec. 29, 2003. |
Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/748,992, Steven Moris Sikorski, filed Dec. 29, 2003. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 28, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/748,992, Steven Moris Sikorski, filed Dec. 29, 2003. |
Office Action mailed on Dec. 10, 2009 in Australian Patent Application No. 2005233951. |
Office Action mailed on Jan. 7, 2011 in Australian Patent Application No. 2005233951. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 29, 2010 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2562145. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 30, 2009 in Chinese Patent Application No. 200580015277.0. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 2, 2011 in Chinese Patent Application No. 200580015277.0. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 20, 2009 in European Patent Application No. 05733020.1. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 16, 2010 in European Patent Application No. 05733020.1. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 22, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 05733020.1. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 5, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-507376. |
Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 1, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-507376. |
European Search Report mailed on Aug. 29, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 11174542.8. |
European Search Report mailed on Aug. 29, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 11174555.0. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 28, 2011 in Australian Patent Application No. 2011221421. |
Miniature MEMS Accelerometer Adds Motin Sensing to Consumer Products, Ashok Bindra, Jun. 26, 2000, 1 sheet. |
Coming: MEMS Accelerometers for Motin Detection, Jim Pinto, Aug. 6, 2003, 1 sheet. |
MEMS, Stephanie Izarek, Apr. 3, 2001, PC Magazine, 1 sheet. |
“Analog Devices Expands Low-G MEMS Portfolio with 3-Axis Accelerometer Technology for Portable Applications, Jan. 31, 2005, Business Wire, 3 sheets”. |
Accelerometers: Jump into the Consumer Market, Michelle A. Clifford, Aug. 2004, Sensormag.com, 5 sheets. |
Supplementary European Search Report mailed on Feb. 2, 2009 in European Patent Application No. 05733020.1. |
Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,225, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 30, 2004. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,225, Thomas Wulff, filed on Jul. 30, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent application No. PCT/US05/10971 mailed on Jun. 24, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Patent application No. PCT/US05/10971 issued on Jul. 15, 2008. |
Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 24, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,459, Thomas Wulff, filed Dec. 29, 2009. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,459, Thomas Wulff, filed Dec. 29, 2009. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 15, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/097,287, Thomas Wulff, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,493, Thomas Wulff, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Sep. 9, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 28, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 8, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on May 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 26, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Non Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,246, Thomas Wulff, filed Jul. 27, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070298751 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |