Downhole packers are commonly used in many oilfield applications for the purpose of sealing against the flow of fluid to isolate one or more portions of a wellbore for the purposes of testing, treating, or producing the well. The packers are suspended in the wellbore, or in a casing in the wellbore, from a tubing string, or the like, and are activated, or set, so that one or more packer elements engage the inner surface of the wellbore or casing. These packers also include one or more slips which, when set, are anchored to the inner surface of the wellbore to hold the packer in place.
However, after the packers have been set in the wellbore in the above manner, relative movement between the packer and the casing can occur which can adversely affect the performance of the packer.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for monitoring the packer movement, or slippage.
Referring to
The tool 10 includes a packer that consists of an annular packer element 14 and an annular slip 16 located downstream and slightly spaced from the packer element 14. The packer element 14 is located at a predetermined axial location in the casing 12 and is set, or activated, in a conventional manner which causes it to engage the inner surface of the casing 12 to seal against the flow of fluids and thus permit the isolation of certain zones in the well. Also as a result of the setting, the slip 16 “bites” into the inner surface of the casing 12 to anchor the packer to the casing 12. Since both the packer element 14 and the slip 16 are conventional, they will not be described in further detail.
A sensor 20 is disposed in the casing 12 just above the upper end of the slip 16, as viewed in
An electronics package is provided that includes an electrical circuit shown, in general, by the reference numeral 30 that is electrically connected between the sensors 20 and 24 and a telemetry device, or unit 32 which can be located downhole or at the ground surface. A computer 34, or computing device, such as a microprocessor, or the like, is connected in the electrical circuit 30 and includes software containing a movement detection algorithm. The computer 34 can be also be located downhole or at the ground surface.
Thus, the signals from the sensors 20 and 24, which correspond to the position of the slip 16, are inputted to the computer 34, which outputs corresponding signals that correspond to whether or not there is any movement of the slip 16, and, if so, the amount of the movement. The telemetry device 32 receives the signals from the computer 34 and transmits or provides the signals to hardware located at the ground surface or at a downhole location for initiating corrective measures to compensate for any movement of the slip 16. The telemetry device 32 could be of a conventional type, such as EM, acoustic, hardwired, mudpulse, etc.
Thus, the system of the embodiment of
Referring to the embodiment of
The tool 40 includes a packer that consists of an annular packer element 44 and an annular slip 46 located downstream and slightly spaced from the packer element 44. The packer element 44 is located at a predetermined axial location in the casing 42 and is set, or activated, in a conventional manner which causes it to engage the inner surface of the casing 42 to seal against the flow of fluids and thus permit the isolation of certain zones in the well. Also as a result of the setting, the slip 46 “bites” into the inner surface of the casing 42 to anchor the packer to the casing 42. Since both the packer element 44 and the slip 46 are conventional, they will not be described in further detail.
An accelerometer 50 is mounted on the slip 46 and functions in a conventional manner to sense acceleration of the slip 46. The accelerometer 50 can be annular in shape as shown, or can consist of a plurality of modules that are angularly spaced around the slip 46.
An electronics package is provided that includes an electrical circuit shown, in general, by the reference numeral 60, and including an acceleration integrator 62 and a velocity integrator 64 electrically connected between the acceleration integrator 62 and a computer 66, or computing system, such as a microprocessor, that includes software containing a movement detection algorithm. A telemetry device, or unit 68 is also provided which is connected to an output of the computer 66 for receiving a signal from the computer 66. As in the previous embodiment, the telemetry device 68 could be of a conventional type, such as EM, acoustic, hardwired, mudpulse, etc. Each of the acceleration integrator 62, the velocity integrator 64, the computer 66, and the telemetry device 68 can be located downhole or at the ground surface.
In operation, signals from the accelerometer 50, which correspond to any acceleration of the slip 46, are inputted to the acceleration integrator 62, which integrates the signals either in an analog domain or in a digital domain (using an analog to digital converter and a processor), to produce a signal corresponding to the velocity of the slip 46. The velocity integrator 64 receives the signals from the acceleration integrator 62 and integrates the signals in the above manner to produce signals corresponding to the displacement of the slip 46.
The signals from the velocity integrator 64 are inputted to the computer 66, which outputs corresponding signals that correspond to whether or not there is any movement of the slip 46 and, if so, the amount of the movement. The telemetry device 68 receives the signals from the computer 66 and functions to initiate corresponding corrective measures to compensate for any movement of the slip 46.
It should be noted that, under normal conditions, there will be many acceleration signals sensed and processed in the above manner, even though the slip 46 is not moving. However this does not present a problem since the computed displacement will be zero.
Thus, the system of the embodiment of
It is understood that several variations may be made in the foregoing without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the present invention is not limited to sensing of movement of the slips, but is equally applicable to other components of the packer, such as the packer elements. Also, the number of packer elements and slips used in both of the above embodiments can be varied within the scope of the invention. Further, the number of sensors used in the embodiment of FIG. 1 and the number of accelerators used in the embodiment of
Still further, movement of the slips, the packer elements, or the packer in general, could be sensed by devices other than the devices disclosed above. For example, the sensing device could be in the form of a rolling element, such as a wheel, mounted on an arm to contact the inner diameter of the casing such that movement of the outer packer body parts would cause wheel rotation. A proximity sensor is mounted adjacent the wheel to count revolutions of the wheel and therefore movement of the packer relative to the casing.
An alternative sensing device is in the form of a collet type “feeler,” which, when activated, would spring into position and engage the tubing/casing ID. A shoulder on the collet feeler is flanked by sensors above and below so that, if the packer moves, the feeler would remain in the initial position, and the respective upper or lower proximity sensor would indicate direction of movement.
Another form of the sensing device includes a movable contact component incorporated into the slip structure which deploys to the casing wall with the slip. Proximity sensors, disposed in the slip or in the component, monitor the position of the component relative to the slip body. Should the slip start to slide in the casing, the component would still be biased or loaded to the casing/tubing wall, and would not move relative to the slip, yet a response from the proximity sensors would be triggered. This device could also be incorporated into wedges or ramps associated with the packer.
Another embodiment of a sensing device utilizes a strain gauge imbedded in a slip support (in the form of a wedge or ramp) to monitor force transmitted between the slip and the slip support. As the load transmitted from the slip to the slip support reaches a near zero condition, slippage of the packer can occur since the slip teeth may not be engaged into the tubing/casing wall. The strain gauge could also be imbedded into the slip body to measure strain in the slip so that, as strain approaches zero, no load would be held by the slip. Another variant using strain measurement includes the use of a probe equipped with a strain monitoring sensor so that movement of the packer would cause the probe to bend, thereby increasing the strain in the probe.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many other modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4067349 | Austin et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4206810 | Blackman | Jun 1980 | A |
4426882 | Skinner | Jan 1984 | A |
4506731 | Skinner | Mar 1985 | A |
4508174 | Skinner et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4582136 | Skinner | Apr 1986 | A |
4866607 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4999817 | Zimmer | Mar 1991 | A |
5234057 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236048 | Skinner et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5273113 | Schultz | Dec 1993 | A |
5279363 | Schultz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293937 | Schultz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5318137 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332035 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5355960 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367911 | Jewell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5412568 | Schultz | May 1995 | A |
5490564 | Schultz et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5517854 | Plumb et al. | May 1996 | A |
5899958 | Dowell et al. | May 1999 | A |
6050131 | Willauer | Apr 2000 | A |
6070672 | Gazda | Jun 2000 | A |
6131658 | Minear | Oct 2000 | A |
6144316 | Skinner | Nov 2000 | A |
6229453 | Gardner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
6236620 | Schultz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257332 | Vidrine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273189 | Gissler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286596 | Schnatzmeyer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6310559 | Laborde et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321838 | Skinner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328119 | Gillis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6384738 | Carstensen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394181 | Schnatzmeyer et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
20010013410 | Beck et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013411 | Beck et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010040033 | Schnatzmeyer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042617 | Beck et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043146 | Beck et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030188862 | Streich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040112597 | Hamid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173363 | Navarro-Sorroche | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0055475 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030231117 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |