This application is a non-provisional application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/907,133, entitled “MONITORING STREET LIGHTING LUMINAIRES,” filed 21 Nov. 2013, which is herein incorporated by reference.
Embodiments of the present specification relate generally to street lighting, and more particularly to a system and method for monitoring street lighting luminaires.
It is desirable to ensure that adequate street lighting is provided on the streets for the safety of pedestrians and motorized and non-motorized vehicle operators and passengers. However, operating and maintaining street lighting entail considerable expenditure. Typically, conventional lighting, such as incandescent lighting is costly to operate and maintain. Accordingly, city infrastructure authorities are currently working towards replacing conventional lighting with light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Also, in some locations, there is a drive to use LED lighting for newly installed street lighting.
One of the challenges with LED lighting when compared with that of the conventional lighting is the assessment of an operating condition of the LED lighting. For example, when a conventional lamp has burnt out or has aged, the conventional lamp does not draw any electrical current. Accordingly, the operating condition of the conventional lamp may be assessed by monitoring the electrical current flowing through the lamp. On the other hand, when the LED lighting is burnt out or has aged, the intensity of the LED becomes dimmer, however, the LED lighting still draws an electrical current. Hence, monitoring the LED lighting to assess the working condition of the LED lighting is a challenging task.
In accordance with aspects of the present specification, a system for identifying a fault in a light source is presented. The system includes at least one luminaire that includes the light source configured to emit light. Also, the at least one luminaire includes a monitoring device disposed proximate to the light source. The monitoring device includes a sensing unit configured to measure an amount of light emitted by the light source, and a squawk unit electrically coupled to the sensing unit and configured to generate a squawk signal based on the amount of light emitted from the light source, where the squawk signal is indicative of the fault in the light source. Further, the system includes a diagnostic unit communicatively coupled to the at least one luminaire and configured to determine the fault in the light source based on the squawk signal, and transmit a termination signal to the squawk unit to decouple an electrical power supply from the light source.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present disclosure, a luminaire system is presented. The luminaire system includes a light source configured to emit light. Also, the luminaire system includes a sensing unit disposed proximate to the light source and configured to measure an amount of light emitted from the light source. Further, the luminaire system includes a squawk unit electrically coupled to the sensing unit and configured to generate a squawk signal based on the amount of light emitted from the light source, where the squawk signal is indicative of a fault in the light source, communicate the squawk signal to a diagnostic unit, and decouple an electrical power supply from the light source based on a termination signal received from the diagnostic unit.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a method is presented. The method includes measuring, by a sensing unit, light emitted from a light source. Further, the method includes generating, by a squawk unit, a squawk signal based on an amount of light emitted from the light source, where the squawk signal is indicative of a fault in the light source. Also, the method includes communicating, by the squawk unit, the squawk signal to a diagnostic unit. In addition, the method includes decoupling an electrical power supply from the light source based on a termination signal received from the diagnostic unit.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
As will be described in detail hereinafter, various embodiments of exemplary systems and methods for determining a malfunction in one or more light sources in a street lighting subsystem are presented. By employing the methods and the various embodiments of the systems described hereinafter, light emitted from a light source is evaluated and the condition of the light source is determined accordingly. Moreover, the existing power line of the street lighting subsystem may be utilized for monitoring the condition of the light source, which in turn substantially reduces the cost of operating and maintaining the street lighting subsystem.
Turning now to the drawings and referring to
The system 100 may include a diagnostic unit 106. In one example, the street lighting subsystem 101 may be communicatively coupled to the diagnostic unit 106. Particularly, the street lighting subsystem 101 may include one or more luminaires that are communicatively coupled to the diagnostic unit 106. For ease of understanding, the street lighting subsystem 101 is depicted with a single luminaire 102. It may be noted that the street lighting subsystem 101 may include any number of luminaires to illuminate a geographic location, and is not limited to one luminaire 102 as shown in
Further, the luminaire 102 may include a light source 104, a monitoring device 108, and a lamp post 110. In one example, the light source 104 is operatively coupled to the monitoring device 108. The light source 104 may be a light-emitting diode (LED) source that emits light to illuminate a location surrounding the luminaire 102. Further, the monitoring device 108 is operatively coupled to the lamp post 110. The monitoring device 108 may be configured to determine a working condition of the light source 104. In one example, the monitoring device 108 may be configured to determine the working condition of the light source 104 by measuring an amount of light emitted from the light source 104. In one embodiment, the monitoring device 108 may be detachably coupled to the light source 104. In another embodiment, the monitoring device 108 and the light source 104 may be disposed in a single unit. Further, the monitoring device 108 along with the light source 104 may be mounted on the lamp post 110. In general, the lamp post 110 may be used to elevate the light source 104 to a determined height from the ground.
In a presently contemplated configuration, the monitoring device 108 may include a sensing unit 112 and a squawk unit 114. The sensing unit 112 and the squawk unit 114 may be electrically coupled to each other. Further, the sensing unit 112 may be positioned proximate to the light source 104. The sensing unit 112 may be used to determine an amount of light emitted from the light source 104. In one example, the sensing unit 112 may include one or more photocells that are used to sense the light emitted from the light source 104. It may be noted that the sensing unit 112 may include any type of photo-detector to detect the light emitted from the light source 104.
Furthermore, the sensing unit 112 may also be configured to determine and/or monitor an intensity of the light emitted from the light source 104. In one example, the sensing unit 112 may be configured to generate an electrical signal that is representative of the emitted light from the light source 104. It may be noted that if the amount of light emitted by the light source 104 is below a threshold value, it may be representative of a fault or malfunction in the light source 104. Accordingly, the sensing unit 112 may be configured to compare this electrical signal with the threshold value to determine whether the emitted light from the light source 104 is below the threshold value. If the emitted light is below the threshold value, the sensing unit 112 may be configured to generate a triggering signal. Additionally, the sensing unit 112 may be configured to communicate the triggering signal to the squawk unit 114.
Upon receiving the triggering signal, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to generate a squawk signal. Further, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to communicate the generated squawk signal to the diagnostic unit 106. In one example, the squawk signal may include one or more tones that are generated at a determined frequency to indicate that the light source 104 is malfunctioning. Moreover, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to continuously generate the squawk signal until the electrical power supply to the light source 104 is decoupled. In one embodiment, the squawk signal may include an address associated with the luminaire 102. This address may be utilized by the diagnostic unit 106 to identify the luminaire 102 among a plurality of luminaires (not show in
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to aerially communicate the squawk signal to the diagnostic unit 106. This squawk signal may also be referred to as a sound-based squawk signal. In this embodiment, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to emit or radiate the squawk signal at an ultrasonic or infrasonic frequency, thereby minimizing any nuisance to the pedestrians and/or motorists on the street. It may be noted that the squawk signal may be emitted at any frequency, and is not limited to the ultrasonic or infrasonic frequency. Further, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to aerially receive this squawk signal.
Upon receiving the squawk signal from the squawk unit 114, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to analyze the squawk signal to determine the operating condition of the light source 104. Particularly, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to identify the one or more tones in the squawk signal that may be present along with the noise or other signals. In one example, the diagnostic unit 106 may employ one or more narrowband filtering techniques to identify the tones in the squawk signal.
Further, based on the analysis of the identified tones in the squawk signal, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to transmit a termination signal to the squawk unit 114. In one example, the termination signal may include an address associated with the luminaire 102. Further, the squawk unit 114 may receive the termination signal only if the address associated with a corresponding luminaire is present in the termination signal. On receipt of the termination signal, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to decouple/stop the electrical power supply to the light source 104. In one embodiment, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to transmit the termination signal to an addressable switch 118 disposed in the squawk unit 114. The addressable switch 118 in the squawk unit 114 may be configured to decouple the electrical power to the light source 104 based on the received termination signal. Also, in one embodiment, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to communicate a fault signal to an operator device, where the fault signal is indicative of a faulty light source 104 in the street lighting system 100.
Thus, the exemplary system 100 may be configured to effectively identify a fault or malfunction in the light source 104 and decouple electrical power supply to the faulty light source 104. Also, a signal indicative of a desired replacement and/or repair of a faulty light source 104 may be communicated to the operator.
Referring now to
As shown in
Further, if a luminaire among the plurality of luminaires 202-216 fails to emit light above the threshold value as sensed by a corresponding sensing unit, the associated squawk unit may be configured to transmit a squawk signal from the faulty luminaire to the diagnostic unit 218. In one example, if luminaire 202 is malfunctioning, the diagnostic unit 218 may continuously receive the squawk signal from the luminaire 202 until the electrical power supply to that luminaire 202 is decoupled. Particularly, the luminaire 202 may transmit the squawk signal to the diagnostic unit 218 until a termination signal is received from the diagnostic unit 218, and the electrical power supply to the light source in the luminaire 202 is decoupled via use of an addressable switch in the luminaire 202.
In one embodiment, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to process the squawk signal that may include noise and/or other signals. The diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to process the squawk signal to recognize one or more tones in the squawk signal. The one or more tones may be at a determined frequency. As will be appreciated, the diagnostic unit 218 may receive different types of signals from external devices including the luminaires 202-216, thereby enhancing the complexity of identification of the squawk signal among these signals by the diagnostic unit 218. Therefore, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to process each of these signals to verify the presence of one or more tones in the signals. If the signal includes one or more tones, then the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to identify the corresponding signal as a squawk signal. In one example, the diagnostic unit 218 may employ narrowband filtering techniques to identify the one or more tones in the squawk signal. In one embodiment, the squawk signals may also include an address of a corresponding luminaire. Accordingly, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to extract this address to identify the luminaire that is malfunctioning, thereby allowing timely identification of a malfunctioning luminaire. In one embodiment, the squawk signal may be affected/diminished by standing wave interference on the power line 220. However, by including the plurality of tones in the squawk signal, the squawk signal may overcome the ability of standing wave interference on the power line to diminish the squawk signal.
In accordance with other aspects of the present specification, the luminaires 202-216 may be configured to transmit the squawk signals that do not include the address of a corresponding luminaire. For example, one or more malfunctioning luminaires may transmit substantially similar squawk signals to the diagnostic unit 218. Accordingly, in this embodiment, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to identify one or more malfunctioning luminaire using the squawk signals. More particularly, in this embodiment, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to identify the one or more malfunctioning luminaires by using a sequential testing protocol. As per the sequential testing protocol, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to sequentially deactivate individual luminaires or a group of luminaires in the plurality of luminaires for a determined time period. Further, during this time period, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to verify receipt of the squawk signals from the individual luminaires or the group of luminaires. If no squawk signals are received, then the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to confirm that the deactivated luminaires include one or more malfunctioning luminaires.
Similarly, if no squawk signals are received after deactivating a single luminaire, then the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to confirm that this single luminaire is a malfunctioning luminaire. In a similar manner, if no squawk signals are received after deactivating a group of luminaires, then the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to confirm that one or more luminaires in this group of luminaires are malfunctioning. Also, the diagnostic unit 218 may further be configured to intelligently divide the luminaires in the group of luminaires by sequentially deactivating corresponding luminaires. Further, this refinement may continue until one or more malfunctioning luminaires are identified.
In the embodiment of
Furthermore, in one embodiment, the diagnostic unit 218 may include a sound detector configured to detect the squawk signals that are emitted or radiated into air by the one or more luminaires 202-216. More particularly, the diagnostic unit 218 having the sound detector may be mounted on a vehicle. Further, the vehicle may be driven in the vicinity of the luminaires 202-216 and the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to monitor for the presence of a sound-based squawk signal and its associated luminaire. In one embodiment, the vehicle may be driven in the vicinity of the luminaires 202-216 and the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to individually activate and deactivate each of the luminaires 202-216. In one example, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to activate each of the luminaires 202-216 by providing the electrical power supply to a corresponding luminaire. Furthermore, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to deactivate each of the luminaires 202-216 by decoupling the electrical power supply to the corresponding luminaire. Also, the sound detector in the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to determine whether the radiation of squawk signals is terminated by deactivating a respective luminaire. This process of activating and deactivating each luminaire is continued until the diagnostic unit 218 identifies one or more malfunctioning luminaires in the system 200. In one another embodiment, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to notify an operator that one or more luminaires are malfunctioning. Also, the diagnostic unit 218 may be configured to notify the operator to repair or replace the one or more malfunctioning luminaires.
Turning to
Furthermore, at step 304, a squawk signal may be generated based on the amount of light emitted from the light source. A squawk unit 114 in the monitoring device 108 is used to generate the squawk signal. The sensing unit 112 may be configured to verify whether the amount of light emitted from the light source is below a threshold value. If the amount of light emitted from the light source is below the threshold value, the sensing unit 112 may be configured to transmit a triggering signal to the squawk unit 114. Further, in response to receiving the triggering signal, the squawk unit 114 may be configured to generate the squawk signal that is indicative of a fault or malfunction in the light source.
In addition, at step 306, the squawk signal may be communicated to a diagnostic unit 106. The squawk unit 114 may be configured to communicate the squawk signal to the diagnostic unit 106. Particularly, the squawk signal may be transmitted by the squawk unit 114 via a power cable 116 that is used to operatively couple the light source 104 and the diagnostic unit 106. In one embodiment, the squawk unit 114 may aerially transmit the squawk signal towards the diagnostic unit 106. At the other end, the diagnostic unit 106 may use one or more sound detectors to receive the aerially transmitted squawk signals. Further, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to process the squawk signal to detect a fault or malfunctioning light source 104.
Subsequently, at step 308, a termination signal may be generated by the diagnostic unit 106. Particularly, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to generate the termination signal in response to the squawk signal received by the diagnostic unit 106 from the squawk unit 114. The diagnostic unit 106 may also be configured to communicate the termination signal to the squawk unit 114. The termination signal may be used to decouple electrical power supply to the light source 104 that is malfunctioning.
In accordance with further aspects of the present specification, the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may also be configured to detect a fault or a malfunctioning light source 104 by using a sound detector. More particularly, the sound detector may be included in the diagnostic unit 106, 218 that is mounted on a vehicle. Further, the vehicle may be driven in the vicinity of the luminaires 202-216 and the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may be configured to monitor for the presence of a sound-based squawk signal and an associated luminaire. In another embodiment, the vehicle may be driven in the vicinity of the luminaires 202-216 and the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may be configured to individually activate and deactivate each of the luminaires 202-216. In one example, the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may be configured to activate each of the luminaires 202-216 by providing the electrical power supply to a corresponding luminaire. Furthermore, the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may be configured to deactivate each of the luminaires 202-216 by decoupling the electrical power supply to the corresponding luminaire. Also, the sound detector in the diagnostic unit 106, 218 may be configured to determine whether the radiation of squawk signals is terminated by deactivating a respective luminaire. This process of activating and deactivating the luminaires is continued until the diagnostic unit 106, 218 identifies one or more malfunctioning luminaires in the system 200.
Further, at step 310, the electrical power supply to the light source 104 is decoupled based on the received termination signal. The squawk unit 114 may include an addressable switch 118 that is used to decouple the electrical power supply to the light source 104 when the termination signal is received form the diagnostic unit 106. Also, in one embodiment, the diagnostic unit 106 may be configured to inform an operator to rectify or replace the light source 104 that is malfunctioning.
The various embodiments of the exemplary system and method aid in identifying one or more faulty luminaires among a plurality of luminaires in the street lighting subsystem. Also, the system aids in terminating the electrical power supply to a light source, which in turn saves electrical power in the street lighting subsystem. Also, since the system utilizes the existing power cables for communicating signals between the luminaires and the diagnostic unit, the cost involved in operating and maintaining the system is substantially reduced.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4704610 | Smith et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5014052 | Obeck | May 1991 | A |
5199044 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5243185 | Blackwood | Sep 1993 | A |
5345232 | Robertson | Sep 1994 | A |
5519692 | Hershey et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519725 | Hershey et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526357 | Jandrell | Jun 1996 | A |
5563906 | Hershey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568507 | Hershey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568508 | Hershey | Oct 1996 | A |
5568509 | Hershey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568522 | Hershey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5682100 | Rossi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5761238 | Ross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5844949 | Hershey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852243 | Chang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5903594 | Saulnier et al. | May 1999 | A |
6011508 | Perreault et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6101214 | Hershey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6288632 | Hoctor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6346875 | Puckette et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6424250 | Puckette, IV et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430210 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433976 | Phillips | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459998 | Hoffman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6522243 | Saulnier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6659715 | Kuesters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6717660 | Bernardo | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6943668 | Gaus, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7175082 | Hoshina | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7248149 | Bachelder et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7294977 | Eusterbrock et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7333903 | Walters et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7418346 | Breed et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7460787 | Damink et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7580705 | Kumar | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7629899 | Breed | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646330 | Karr | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7817063 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834555 | Cleland et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855376 | Cantin et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876864 | Conrad et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7899621 | Breed et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912645 | Breed et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7983685 | Silverstrim et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983836 | Breed | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8138690 | Chemel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140276 | Walters et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8227995 | Damink et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232745 | Chemel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244260 | Silverstrim et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260537 | Breed | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8274373 | Nysen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8339069 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8368321 | Chemel et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8373362 | Chemel et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384312 | Tsai | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8436748 | Mimeault et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441214 | Anderson | May 2013 | B2 |
8442403 | Weaver | May 2013 | B2 |
8456325 | Sikora | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8842009 | Jones | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020141882 | Ingistov et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050017647 | Huang | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050187701 | Baney | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070201540 | Berkman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229250 | Recker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080037241 | Von Der Brelie | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072766 | Kobylarz | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122642 | Radtke et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150757 | Hutchison | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080238720 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090002982 | Hu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034258 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090066540 | Marinakis et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120299 | Rahn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158739 | Messmer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164174 | Bears et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090214198 | Takahashi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090297156 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100115093 | Rice | May 2010 | A1 |
20100295473 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295474 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295475 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295482 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295943 | Cha et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296285 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301768 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301770 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301771 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301773 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301774 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301834 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100302779 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001436 | Chemel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110001438 | Chemel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110001626 | Yip et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043035 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069960 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095867 | Ahmad | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115384 | Chatelus | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140950 | Andersson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110215736 | Horbst et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227584 | Beck | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110288658 | Walters et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120062123 | Jarrell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086560 | Ilyes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086561 | Ilyes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120126721 | Kuenzler et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136485 | Weber et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140748 | Carruthers | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154239 | Bar-Sade et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163826 | Schenk et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120209505 | Breed et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218101 | Ford | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230696 | Pederson et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245880 | Nabrotzky | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256777 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262304 | Cripps | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286673 | Holland et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308239 | Sheth et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120309293 | Kummetz et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321321 | Riesebosch | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323474 | Breed et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130044488 | Hreish | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057158 | Josefowicz et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130101003 | Vedantham et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130140995 | Jones | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169468 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172012 | Zudrell-Koch | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181636 | Agrawal | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214697 | Archenhold | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229116 | Van Zeijl et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257284 | VanWagoner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293117 | Verfuerth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130330172 | Scipio et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140055439 | Lee | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140124007 | Scipio et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175982 | Yao | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1437270 | Jul 2004 | EP |
2131630 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2521426 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2403357 | Dec 2004 | GB |
2005248607 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2009025209 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009103497 | May 2009 | JP |
1020060008967 | Jan 2006 | KR |
1020060102552 | Sep 2006 | KR |
100986279 | Oct 2010 | KR |
2005029437 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2009148466 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010079388 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011142516 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012090142 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012140152 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013160791 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/543,892, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hershey et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,954, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,408, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,982, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,486, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,916, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,256, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Barnett et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,856, filed Nov. 18, 2014, Hartman et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066927 dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
“Monitoring and Evaluation Protocol for the Field Performance of LED Street Lighting Technologies”, Light Savers Accelerating Advanced Outdoor Lighting, pp. 5-32, 2011. |
Atlas, “Optical Extinction by Rainfall”, Journal of Meteorology, vol. No. 10, pp. 486-488, Dec. 1953. |
Noe et al., “Global Positioning System, A Navigation Algorithm for the Low-Cost GPS Receiver”, The Institute of Navigation, vol. No. 1, pp. 166-172, 1980. |
Proakis, “Spread Spectrum Signals for Digital Communication,” in Digital Communications, for an overview of DS theory, pp. 1-27, 1983. |
Hershey et al., “Random and Pseudorandom Sequences,” Data Transportation and Protection, pp. 259-310, 1986. |
“Millimeter Wave Propagation: Spectrum Management Implications” published by the FCC as Bulletin No. 70, Jul. 1997. |
Pang et al., “LED Traffic Light as a Communications Device”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 788-793, 1999. |
Mimbela et al., “A Summary of Vehicle Detection and Surveillance Technologies Used in Intelligent Transportation Systems”, Southwest Technology Development Institute, pp. 1-211, Nov. 30, 2000. |
Bullimore, “Controlling Traffic With Radio”, IEEE Review, vol. No. 47, Issue No. 1, pp. 40-44, Jan. 2001. |
Chao-Qun et al., “Application of Low-voltage Power Line Communication in a City Street Lamp Long-distance Intelligent Monitoring System”, Research and Developments, 2006. |
Cho et al., “Street Lighting Control Based on LonWorks Power Line Communication”, Power Line Communications and Its Applications, pp. 396-398, Apr. 2008. |
Awan et al., “Characterization of Fog and Snow Attenuations for Free-Space Optical Propagation”, Journal of Communications, vol. No. 4, Issue No. 8, pp. 533-545, Sep. 2009. |
Rich, “Light Monitoring System Keeps Glendale, Ariz., Out of the Dark”, Government Technology, Oct. 24, 2011. |
Qian et. al., “Based on PLC and GPRS, ZigBee street lamp wireless control system”, Electronic Design Engineering, vol. No. 20, Issue No. 3, Feb. 2012. |
Stevens et al., “White Paper—The Benefits of 60 GHz Unlicensed Wireless Communications” as captured by Wayback machine, SUB10 systems.com, pp. 1-10, May 7, 2012. |
“Wireless Control and Communication System for LED Luminaires and Other Devices”, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Power Enterprise, pp. 1-15, Jun. 7, 2012. |
Zotos et al., “Case study of a dimmable outdoor lighting system with intelligent management and remote control”, Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU), 2012 International Conference on, pp. 43-48, Jul. 30-Aug. 1, 2012. |
Caillet et al., “LonMark, the open Smart Streetlight Platform”, Lonmark International, pp. 1-16, Feb. 2013. |
After Newtown: A new use for a weapons-detecting radar?, University of Michigan, Apr. 1, 2013. |
Lee et al., “Distributed dimming control for LED lighting”, Optics Express, vol. No. 21, Issue No. S6, pp. 1-16, Nov. 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066954 dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066922 dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066957 dated Mar. 5, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066917 dated Mar. 5, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066337 dated Mar. 6, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066948 dated Mar. 9, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/066942 dated Mar. 20, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150137684 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61907133 | Nov 2013 | US |