The present invention relates to monitoring conditions of a vehicle. It finds particular application in conjunction with monitoring tire conditions of a vehicle and will be described with particular reference thereto. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is also amenable to other applications.
It is becoming more common in modern motor vehicles to monitor tire conditions (e.g., inflation). Maintaining the correct tire conditions helps maintain safe, efficient, and economical operation of the vehicle. Abnormal tire conditions may result in excessive tire wear, blow-outs, and poor fuel mileage.
Conventional tire condition monitoring systems typically include radio frequency (RF) sensors associated with respective tires of the vehicle. The sensors include RF transmitters that transmit intermittent signals indicating tire conditions (e.g., pressures, temperature, etc.) in the respective tires of the vehicle. One or more antennas placed throughout the vehicle receive the tire condition signals from the various transmitters. The antennas are electrically connected to a central electronic control unit (ECU) via electrical cables. The RF signals from the transmitters, which are received by the antennas, are transmitted from the antennas to the central ECU via the cable.
In order to avoid signal loss, the electrical cabling (which is independent of any on-board communication system such as a J1939 network) includes coaxial cable with relatively expensive shielding and connectors. Furthermore, a central ECU is relatively expensive since it must be able to constantly listen for radio frequency signals from the sensors (which requires relatively higher processing speed), perform control logic for pressure monitoring (which requires relatively slower processing speed), and communicate with the other vehicle systems.
The present invention provides a new and improved apparatus and method for monitoring tire conditions on a vehicle.
In one aspect of the present invention, it is contemplated that an electronic device includes an antenna that receives RF signals from a sensor associated with a respective tire of the vehicle. The RF signals represent a condition of the respective tire. A processor receives the RF signals from the antenna. The processor converts the RF signals to a proprietary serial bus formatted message. The processor transmits the proprietary serial bus formatted message to an electronic control unit via a vehicle communication bus.
In the accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, embodiments of the invention are illustrated, which, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description given below, serve to exemplify the embodiments of this invention.
With reference to
Sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j are associated with the respective tires 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j. In one embodiment, the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j are in-tire sensors. In a step 100, it is also contemplated that one or more of the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j transmit radio-frequency (RF) signals based on (e.g., representing) at least one of the conditions of the respective tires 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j. The signals transmitted by the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j are “raw” data. In one embodiment, it is contemplated that the RF signals include a sensor identifier tag that identifies the respective sensor 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j that generated the signal, an antenna identifier tag, a pressure condition, and a temperature condition. The respective tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j for which the conditions (e.g., pressure and temperature) apply is determined as a function of the sensor identifier tag.
The vehicle 14 includes a vehicle communication bus 20. In one embodiment, the communication bus 20 is a standard protocol communication bus (e.g., a serial data bus such as a J1939 standards protocol communication bus). However, other types of communication buses are also contemplated.
A vehicle electronic control unit (ECU) 22 communicates with the communication bus 20. It is contemplated that the ECU 22 transmits and receives messages to/from the communication bus 20. For example, the vehicle ECU 22 transmits and receives messages formatted according to the J1939 standard protocol. In one embodiment, the vehicle ECU 22 has excess computing capacity. Since experience has shown a vehicle's antilock braking system ECU typically has excess computing capacity, it is assumed, for purposes of discussion, that the vehicle ECU 22 is an antilock braking system ECU. However, it is to be understood that any other vehicle ECU may also be used for monitoring one of more of the conditions of the tires.
An electronic component 24 also communicates with the communication bus 20. It is contemplated that the electronic component 24 transmits and receives messages to/from the communication bus 20 according to the same format (e.g., the J1939 standard protocol) as the standard protocol, but is a proprietary or “private” message. For example, the bus 20 is capable of transmitting messages formatted according to the SAE J1939 standard and, in addition, messages formatted according to other standards (e.g., proprietary standards). In one embodiment, messages formatted according to the SAE J1939 standard are “public” messages, if, for example, controllers from many different manufacturers are designed to interpret the messages. Messages formatted according to proprietary standards are referred to as “private” messages if, for example, only vehicle controllers manufactured by a particular manufacturer are designed to interpret the messages.
In the illustrated embodiment, the electronic component 24 includes an antenna 26 and a processing device 30 (e.g., a microcontroller). The processing device 30 acts as a single monitoring device, and eliminates the necessity of providing monitoring devices at each wheel end. In the illustrated embodiment, the processor 30 acts as a single conduit for the signals from any of the plurality of sensors associated with respective tires on the vehicle. Although only one (1) electronic component 24 is illustrated, additional electronic components (including respective antennas and processing devices) are contemplated in different embodiments (e.g., to accommodate longer wheel base vehicles) in which the multiple processors act as respective conduits (not merely a single conduit) for the signals from the plurality of sensors associated with respective tires on the vehicle. In a step 102, the antenna 26 receives the RF signals transmitted from one or more of the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j. In the illustrated embodiment, the signals are transmitted wirelessly as RF signals from the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j to the antenna 26 (which reduces the necessity of cabling between the sensors and the antenna). However, it is to be understood that other embodiments, in which the signals are transmitted from the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j to the antenna 26 via an electrical connection (e.g., a wire), are also contemplated. As discussed above, the RF signals received by the antenna 26 are based on the pressures, temperatures, and/or other various conditions of the respective tires 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j.
The RF signals are transmitted from the antenna 26 to the processing device 30 of the electronic component 24. The processing device 30 may be configured to always be “listening” for signals from the antenna 26. In one embodiment, it is contemplated that the processing device 30 is powered by the vehicle battery voltage. The processing device 30 requires significantly less power than the ECU 22 and will limit drain on the vehicle battery. In this case, the processing device 30 may be listening for signals even when the vehicle's engine is not running. Then, once the ignition is turned-on, the processing device 30 may transmit the data to the ECU 22, as discussed in more detail below. Such a design allows for a warning of out-of-range tire pressure shortly after the vehicle 14 is started. In another embodiment, the processing device 30 may be powered directly from a central computer or from the ECU 22. This design allows for low voltage power to be applied to the processing device 30. In addition, this design may provide for lower costs since there is reduced circuit protection and less complexity. However, the processing device 30 may not be able to receive signals when the vehicle ignition is off.
The processing device 30 converts the RF signals, which represent the “raw” data based on the tire conditions, to a respective message formatted for the communication bus 20 in a step 104. In one embodiment, the identifier tag information and/or a sensor identification code is/are embedded in the message along with the tire condition information from the respective sensor 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j that transmitted the signal. In an alternate embodiment including multiple electronic components 24, the sensor identification code uniquely identifies the respective antenna (and sensor) that sent the message. As discussed above, it is contemplated that the message is a “private” message formatted according to the J1939 standard protocol. In a step 106, the processing device 30 transmits the message to the communication bus 20. In one embodiment, the processing device 30 transmits the message to the vehicle ECU 22 via the communication bus 20.
Upon receiving one of the messages, in a step 110, from the processing device 30, the vehicle ECU 22 analyzes the message and, in a step 112, determines, based on the identifier tag information in the message, which one of the tires 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j the condition information relates to. For example, the vehicle ECU 22 determines, based on the identifier tag information in the message, which one of the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j transmitted the message. In a step 114, the vehicle ECU 22 converts the proprietary message to a J1939 public format. The public message is transmitted, in a step 116, from the ECU 22 to the bus 20.
In one embodiment, the vehicle ECU 22 transmits the public message, in the step 116, with pressure identified in kilopascals and temperature identified in Celsius along with the appropriate location identifiers so that the message may be interpreted by other systems on the vehicle 14. The process then returns to the step 100. For example, if the pressure in the respective tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j is below the predetermined range, the message transmitted to vehicle communication bus 20 by the other systems on the vehicle 14 may alert an operator of the vehicle 14 of the low pressure condition. On the other hand, if the pressure in the respective tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j is above the predetermined range, the message transmitted to vehicle communication bus 20 by the vehicle ECU 22 may activate a tire deflation system for decreasing the pressure of the tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j and/or cause another vehicle system to alert an operator of the vehicle 14 of the high pressure condition. The alert given to the vehicle operator may be an audible sound (e.g., a buzzer) or a visual display (e.g., a dashboard light that is illuminated). Otherwise, if the condition(s) of the respective tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j is/are within the predetermined range, the vehicle ECU 22 still puts the current condition information on the bus in the J1939 public message format so that the condition information is readable by other vehicle systems, and then returns to the step 100.
It is contemplated that the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j transmit the signals, based on the respective tire 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, 12f, 12g, 12h, 12i, 12j conditions, at relatively infrequent intervals. For example, in one embodiment, the sensors transmit the respective signals between about every 1 minute and about every 15 minutes (e.g., between about every 3 minutes and about every 5 minutes). Such infrequent transmissions provide the processing device 30 the time required for converting the RF signals to the J1939 messages and transmitting those messages along the relatively slower serial communication bus 20. Therefore, neither the bus 20 nor the vehicle ECU 22 is overwhelmed by messages from the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j (other RF applications typically are constantly transmitting information to the bus 20). Sufficient time would not be available to the processing device 30 for performing the conversions if the sensors were transmitting the data signals increased frequencies. In addition, the relatively infrequent transmissions help to limit the amount of data transmitted between the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j and the vehicle ECU 22 via the vehicle communication bus 20. The relatively reduced amount of data transmissions on the vehicle communication bus 20 from the sensors relatively increases the capacity of the communication bus 20 for other messages to/from the ECU 22 and other electronic control units on the vehicle 14.
In one embodiment, it is contemplated that the vehicle ECU 22 transmits one or more control messages to the processing device 30 of the electronic component 24. For example, if the vehicle ECU 22 has not received a message from one of the sensors 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j within a predetermined time period, ECU 22 may transmit a status request message to the respective sensor, via the communication bus 20 and the processing device 30, to request a status of the sensor. In this case, the processing device 30 converts the status request message to, for example, an RF signal, which is then transmitted to the respective sensor 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d, 16e, 16f, 16g, 16h, 16i, 16j via the antenna 26. If the ECU 22 does not receive a status message from the sensor within a predetermined response period, the ECU 22 may set a fault indicating a status of the sensor (e.g., that the respective sensor is malfunctioning). In addition, the ECU 22 may alert the vehicle operator of the sensor's status via an audible sound (e.g., a buzzer) or a visual display (e.g., a dashboard light that is illuminated).
In another embodiment, it is contemplated that the vehicle ECU 22 may monitor tire trend data. Such data may be analyzed for improving vehicle performance.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention, in its broader aspects, is not limited to the specific details, the representative apparatus, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the applicant's general inventive concept.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3780373 | Holst et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 4328494 | Goodall | May 1982 | A |
| 5231872 | Bowler et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5481253 | Phelan et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5606732 | Vignone, Sr. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5659304 | Chakraborty | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5717135 | Fiorletta et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5839534 | Chakraborty et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5977870 | Rensel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6034597 | Normann et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055855 | Straub | May 2000 | A |
| 6076622 | Chakraborty et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6087930 | Kulka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6181241 | Normann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6198995 | Settles et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6229452 | Kull | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6232875 | DeZorzi | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6289332 | Menig et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
| 6292096 | Munch et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293096 | Khair et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6334081 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6347680 | Mianzo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357839 | Eckert | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6400261 | Starkey et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6473686 | Adachi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6501372 | Lin | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6518875 | DeZorzi | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6549972 | Berstis et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6581449 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6597981 | Nishira et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6603394 | Raichle et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6630885 | Hardman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6769504 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6775282 | Vakkalagadda et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6794993 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6850155 | McQuade | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6885291 | Pollack et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6888934 | Bell | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899153 | Pollack et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6906624 | McClelland et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6972671 | Normann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7091841 | Adamson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7113084 | Huang | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7139653 | Ringger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7149206 | Pruzan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7161476 | Hardman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7162353 | Minowa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7253784 | Shimura | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7309260 | Brower et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7348878 | Fogelstrom | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7375699 | Forster et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7889074 | Anderson | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890229 | Huebl | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8026803 | Lin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 20010056320 | Kato et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020140574 | Starkey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030141130 | Fleming et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030197603 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040034460 | Folkerts et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044448 | Ramaswamy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055370 | Normann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155763 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178897 | Fennel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001470 | Bale et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050001472 | Bale et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050002417 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104715 | Farrell | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025897 | Shostak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168378 | Muth | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070035452 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038346 | Ehrlich et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046098 | Grolle et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052291 | Eberling et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156320 | Breed et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164604 | Bale et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279203 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282514 | Jarrix et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021599 | Bauerle et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051962 | Nakai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191855 | Fink et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246604 | McPherson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288139 | Bouchard et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288150 | Isogai et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319607 | Schindler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090002146 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088910 | Yi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090111652 | Reedy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132138 | Yasuhito et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132142 | Nowak et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090173314 | Whitney et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182478 | Whitney et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224869 | Baker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100038158 | Whitney et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057299 | Burgdorf et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198427 | Fogelstrum et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238012 | Duzdar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286855 | Yang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305809 | Audisio et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110082623 | Lu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098886 | Deng | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191000 | Grolle | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120176234 | Taneyhill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179350 | Taneyhill et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1714804 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 0170520 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 2005113261 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,873, dated Aug. 29, 2012. |
| http://www.onstar.com/web/portal/diagnosticinfo (Printed Dec. 8, 2011). |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,047 dated May 25, 2012. |
| Smartire by Bendix Operators Manual BW-2799, Jun. 2010. |
| Driver Instructions—Collision Warning, SmartCruise, Side Object Detection, VORAD SmartCruise® System, pp. 9-11, Eaton Corporation, Feb. 2009. |
| Office Action for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,873, dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance and Fees Due for counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,047, mailed Oct. 22, 2013. |
| International Search Report for counterpart PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/068399, mailed Mar. 25, 2013. |
| Written Opinion for counterpart PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/068399, mailed Mar. 25, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120223828 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |