The present invention relates generally to a system and method for moving an object. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for using a first magnetic structure associated with a first object and a second magnetic structure associated with a second object to cause the second object to move relative to the first object.
Traditionally, permanent magnets have not been a practical means for moving a first object with a second magnetically attached object for applications where the direction of movement of the first object is perpendicular to the direction of magnetization of the magnets unless an electromagnetic field is applied to the permanent magnets to effect their magnetic properties. Because shear forces between two magnets or between a magnet and metal are low compared to tensile forces, the size of the magnet(s) required to achieve shear forces necessary to maintain attachment of two objects during such movement makes them impractical due to size, weight, cost, and safety reasons. For example, magnets strong enough to attach a blade of a blender or food processor would need to be substantially large to maintain attachment of the blade during normal use of the appliance and would therefore be very difficult to remove, expensive, and generally unsafe in a kitchen environment where lots of metal is present such as stove tops, utensils, and even the blade itself.
Magnetic drives involving electromagnetic fields and permanent magnets have been used to magnetically attach a magnetic structure to magnetizable material associated with blades in blenders, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,033, to Karkos et al. Such magnetic drives require a rotating electromagnetic field to be produced and maintained to enable attachment of the magnetic structure to the magnetizable material during operation of the blender.
Therefore, it is desirable to provide improved systems and methods for moving an object using magnetic structures that do not require electromagnetic fields to be produced.
One embodiment of the invention includes a method for moving an object comprising the steps of associating a first magnetic structure with a first object, associating a second magnetic structure with a second object, said first magnetic structure and said second magnetic structure having a spatial force function in accordance with a code, achieving complementary alignment and peak correlation of said first magnetic structure with said second magnetic structure to produce a peak tensile force enabling magnetic attachment of said first object to said second object, said first magnetic structure and said second magnetic structure also producing a shear force, and moving said second object by moving said first object, said shear force preventing misalignment and decorrelation of said first magnetic structure and said second magnetic structure until an amount of torque greater than a torque threshold is applied to said first object.
The code may correspond to a code modulo of the first magnetic structure and a complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure, the code defines a peak spatial force corresponding to substantial alignment of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure with the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure, the code also defines a plurality of off peak spatial forces corresponding to a plurality of different misalignments of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure and the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure, the plurality of off peak spatial forces having a largest off peak spatial force, and the largest off peak spatial force is less than half of the peak spatial force.
At least one of the first magnetic structure or the second magnetic structure can be configured to rotate about a pivot point, where a range or rotation can be limited.
The method may further comprise the steps of associating a first secondary magnet structure with said first object and associating a second secondary magnet structure with said second object, said first and second secondary magnetic structures providing additional shear force between said first and second object.
The first object may comprise a motor. The second object may comprise a blade.
The first object and said second object may correspond to one of a blender, food processor, mixer, lawnmower, or bush hog.
Under one arrangement, rotating the first object rotates the second object.
Under another arrangement, the first magnetic structure and the second magnetic structure are ring magnetic structures.
A second embodiment of the invention includes a system for moving an object comprising a first magnetic structure associated with a first object and
a second magnetic structure associated with a second object, the first magnetic structure and the second magnetic structure having a spatial force function in accordance with a code, the first magnetic structure with the second magnetic structure being in a complementary alignment resulting in a peak correlation and producing a peak tensile force enabling magnetic attachment of the first object to the second object, the first magnetic structure and the second magnetic structure also producing a shear force that prevents misalignment and decorrelation of the first magnetic structure and the second magnetic structure until an amount of torque greater than a torque threshold is applied to said first object.
The code corresponds to a code modulo of the first magnetic structure and a complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure where the code defines a peak spatial force corresponding to substantial alignment of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure with the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure, the code also defines a plurality of off peak spatial forces corresponding to a plurality of different misalignments of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure and the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure, the plurality of off peak spatial forces having a largest off peak spatial force, and the largest off peak spatial force is less than half of the peak spatial force.
At least one of the first magnetic structure or the second magnetic structure can be configured to rotate about a pivot point, where a range or rotation is limited.
The system may further comprise a first secondary magnet structure associated with the first object and a second secondary magnet structure associated with the second object, the first and second secondary magnetic structures providing additional shear force between the first and second object.
The first object may comprise a motor. The second object may comprise a blade.
The first object and the second object can correspond to one of a blender, food processor, mixer, lawnmower, or bush hog.
Rotating the first object may cause rotation of the second object.
The first magnetic structure and the second magnetic structure can be ring magnetic structures.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
The present invention will now be described more fully in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention should not, however, be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, they are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
The present invention provides a system and method for moving an object. It involves coded magnetic structure techniques related to those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/476,952, filed Jun. 2, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/277,214, titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Sep. 22, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/278,900, titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Sep. 30, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/278,767 titled “A System and Method for Contactless Attachment of Two Objects”, filed Oct. 9, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/280,094, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Oct. 16, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/281,160, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Nov. 13, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/283,780, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Dec. 9, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/284,385, titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Dec. 17, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/342,988 titled “A System and Method for Producing Multi-level Magnetic Fields”, filed Apr. 22, 2010, which are all incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Such systems and methods described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/322,561, filed Feb. 4, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/479,074, 12/478,889, 12/478,939, 12/478,911, 12/478,950, 12/478,969, 12/479,013, 12/479,073, 12/479,106, filed Jun. 5, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/479,818, 12/479,820, 12/479,832, and 12/479,832, file Jun. 7, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/494,064, filed Jun. 29, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/495,462, filed Jun. 30, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/496,463, filed Jul. 1, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/499,039, filed Jul. 7, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/501,425, filed Jul. 11, 2009, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/507,015, filed Jul. 21, 2009 are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Correlated Magnetics Technology
This section is provided to introduce the reader to basic magnets and the new and revolutionary correlated magnetic technology. This section includes subsections relating to basic magnets, correlated magnets, and correlated electromagnetics. It should be understood that this section is provided to assist the reader with understanding the present invention, and should not be used to limit the scope of the present invention.
A. Magnets
A magnet is a material or object that produces a magnetic field which is a vector field that has a direction and a magnitude (also called strength). Referring to
Referring to
B. Correlated Magnets
Correlated magnets can be created in a wide variety of ways depending on the particular application as described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,800,471 and 7,868,721 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/476,952 by using a unique combination of magnet arrays (referred to herein as magnetic field emission sources or magnetic sources), correlation theory (commonly associated with probability theory and statistics) and coding theory (commonly associated with communication systems). A brief discussion is provided next to explain how these widely diverse technologies are used in a unique and novel way to create correlated magnets.
Basically, correlated magnets are made from a combination of magnetic (or electric) field emission sources which have been configured in accordance with a pre-selected code having desirable correlation properties. Thus, when a magnetic field emission structure (or magnetic structure) is brought into alignment with a complementary, or mirror image, magnetic field emission structure the various magnetic field emission sources will all align causing a peak spatial attraction force to be produced, while the misalignment of the magnetic field emission structures cause the various magnetic field emission sources to substantially cancel each other out in a manner that is a function of the particular code used to design the two magnetic field emission structures. In contrast, when a magnetic field emission structure is brought into alignment with a duplicate magnetic field emission structure then the various magnetic field emission sources all align causing a peak spatial repelling force to be produced, while the misalignment of the magnetic field emission structures causes the various magnetic field emission sources to substantially cancel each other out in a manner that is a function of the particular code used to design the two magnetic field emission structures.
The aforementioned spatial forces (attraction, repelling) have a magnitude that is a function of the relative alignment of two magnetic field emission structures and their corresponding spatial force (or correlation) function, the spacing (or distance) between the two magnetic field emission structures, and the magnetic field strengths and polarities of the various sources making up the two magnetic field emission structures. The spatial force functions can be used to achieve precision alignment and precision positioning not possible with basic magnets. Moreover, the spatial force functions can enable the precise control of magnetic fields and associated spatial forces thereby enabling new forms of attachment devices for attaching objects with precise alignment and new systems and methods for controlling precision movement of objects. An additional unique characteristic associated with correlated magnets relates to the situation where the various magnetic field sources making-up two magnetic field emission structures can effectively cancel out each other when they are brought out of alignment which is described herein as a release force. This release force is a direct result of the particular correlation coding used to configure the magnetic field emission structures.
A person skilled in the art of coding theory will recognize that there are many different types of codes that have different correlation properties which have been used in communications for channelization purposes, energy spreading, modulation, and other purposes. Many of the basic characteristics of such codes make them applicable for use in producing the magnetic field emission structures described herein. For example, Barker codes are known for their autocorrelation properties and can be used to help configure correlated magnets. Although, a Barker code is used in an example below with respect to
Referring to
In
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In the above examples, the correlated magnets 304, 306, 402, 406, 502, 508, 604 and 610 overcome the normal ‘magnet orientation’ behavior with the aid of a holding mechanism such as an adhesive, a screw, a bolt & nut, etc. . . . . In other cases, magnets of the same magnetic field emission structure could be sparsely separated from other magnets (e.g., in a sparse array) such that the magnetic forces of the individual magnets do not substantially interact, in which case the polarity of individual magnets can be varied in accordance with a code without requiring a holding mechanism to prevent magnetic forces from ‘flipping’ a magnet. However, magnets are typically close enough to one another such that their magnetic forces would substantially interact to cause at least one of them to ‘flip’ so that their moment vectors align but these magnets can be made to remain in a desired orientation by use of a holding mechanism such as an adhesive, a screw, a bolt & nut, etc. . . . . As such, correlated magnets often utilize some sort of holding mechanism to form different magnetic field emission structures which can be used in a wide-variety of applications like, for example, a turning mechanism, a tool insertion slot, alignment marks, a latch mechanism, a pivot mechanism, a swivel mechanism, a lever, a drill head assembly, a hole cutting tool assembly, a machine press tool, a gripping apparatus, a slip ring mechanism, and a structural assembly.
C. Correlated Electromagnetics
Correlated magnets can entail the use of electromagnets which is a type of magnet in which the magnetic field is produced by the flow of an electric current. The polarity of the magnetic field is determined by the direction of the electric current and the magnetic field disappears when the current ceases. Following are a couple of examples in which arrays of electromagnets are used to produce a first magnetic field emission structure that is moved over time relative to a second magnetic field emission structure which is associated with an object thereby causing the object to move.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Moving a Second Object Magnetically Attached to a First Object
If a force greater than the peak attractive force is applied to cause them to pull apart, the two objects will become detached and move independently as separate objects. Moreover, a torque can be applied to one of the objects to misalign and decorrelate the magnetic structures, which can result in the two magnetic structures repelling each other, there being a lesser attractive force between the two magnetic structures, or there being no force between them depending on how the two structures are coded and their relative alignment to each other while decorrelated. The attract force and repel force characteristics of the two magnetic structures correspond to a spatial force function that is in accordance with a code, where the code corresponds to a code modulo of the first magnetic structure and a complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure. The code defines a peak spatial force corresponding to substantial alignment of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure with the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure. The code also defines a plurality of off peak spatial forces corresponding to a plurality of different misalignments of the code modulo of the first magnetic structure and the complementary code modulo of the second magnetic structure. Under one arrangement, the plurality of off peak spatial forces have a largest off peak spatial force, where the largest off peak spatial force is less than half of the peak spatial force.
As described in relation to
Generally, one skilled in the art of the present invention will understand that it can be applied to various types of appliances such as blenders, food processors, mixers, and the like and also other types of equipment involving rotating blades (or other moving objects) such as lawn mowers, bush hogs, and the like.
Complementary coded ring magnetic structures may have one or more concentric circles of magnetic sources coded in accordance with one or more code modulos of a code. Moreover, portions of ring magnetic structures can be used instead of complete rings.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the blender base unit and blade unit are just examples of where two objects that can be magnetically attached using correlated magnetic structures designed to have specific tensile and shear forces. In particular, such force can be designed into a product to prevent damage when in a bind while also enabling strong attachment and quick and easy detachment. It is also noted that such magnetic structures can be designed so as to achieve desired precision alignment characteristics.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
This non-provisional application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of prior provisional application 61/395,205 titled “A System and Method for Moving an Object” filed May 10, 2010 by Fullerton et al, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. This non-provisional application is related to U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,800,471 and 7,868,721 and non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/476,952 titled “A field emission system and method” filed Jun. 2, 2009 by Fullerton et al, which are each incorporated by reference in their entirety herein. This non-provisional application is related to non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/894,837 titled “Correlated magnetic breakaway device and method” filed Sep. 30, 2010 by Williams et al, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
381968 | Tesla | May 1888 | A |
493858 | Edison | Mar 1893 | A |
687292 | Armstrong | Nov 1901 | A |
996933 | Lindquist | Jul 1911 | A |
1171351 | Neuland | Feb 1916 | A |
1236234 | Troje | Aug 1917 | A |
2243555 | Faus | May 1941 | A |
2389298 | Ellis | Nov 1945 | A |
2438231 | Schultz | Mar 1948 | A |
2471634 | Vennice | May 1949 | A |
2570625 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2722617 | Cluwen et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2932545 | Foley | Apr 1960 | A |
3055999 | Lucas | Sep 1962 | A |
3102314 | Alderfer | Sep 1963 | A |
3208296 | Baermann | Sep 1965 | A |
3238399 | Johanees et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3288511 | Tavano | Nov 1966 | A |
3301091 | Reese | Jan 1967 | A |
3382386 | Schlaeppi | May 1968 | A |
3408104 | Raynes | Oct 1968 | A |
3468576 | Beyer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3474366 | Barney | Oct 1969 | A |
3521216 | Tolegian | Jul 1970 | A |
3645650 | Laing | Feb 1972 | A |
3668670 | Andersen | Jun 1972 | A |
3684992 | Huguet et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3696258 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
3791309 | Baermann | Feb 1974 | A |
3802034 | Bookless | Apr 1974 | A |
3803433 | Ingenito | Apr 1974 | A |
3808577 | Mathauser | Apr 1974 | A |
3845430 | Petkewicz et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3893059 | Nowak | Jul 1975 | A |
4079558 | Gorham | Mar 1978 | A |
4117431 | Eicher | Sep 1978 | A |
4129846 | Yablochnikov | Dec 1978 | A |
4209905 | Gillings | Jul 1980 | A |
4222489 | Hutter | Sep 1980 | A |
4296394 | Ragheb | Oct 1981 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4355236 | Holsinger | Oct 1982 | A |
4399595 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416127 | Naveda | Nov 1983 | A |
4453294 | Morita | Jun 1984 | A |
4535278 | Asakawa | Aug 1985 | A |
4547756 | Miller et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4629131 | Podell | Dec 1986 | A |
4645283 | MacDonald et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4680494 | Grosjean | Jul 1987 | A |
4764743 | Leupold et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4837539 | Baker | Jun 1989 | A |
4849749 | Fukamachi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862128 | Leupold | Aug 1989 | A |
H000693 | Leupold | Oct 1989 | H |
4893103 | Leupold | Jan 1990 | A |
4912727 | Schubert | Mar 1990 | A |
4941236 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956625 | Cardone et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4993950 | Mensor, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994778 | Leupold | Feb 1991 | A |
4996457 | Hawsey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5013949 | Mabe, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5020625 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050276 | Pemberton | Sep 1991 | A |
5062855 | Rincoe | Nov 1991 | A |
5123843 | Van der Zel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5179307 | Porter | Jan 1993 | A |
5213307 | Perrillat-Amede | May 1993 | A |
5302929 | Kovacs | Apr 1994 | A |
5309680 | Kiel | May 1994 | A |
5345207 | Gebele | Sep 1994 | A |
5367891 | Furuyama | Nov 1994 | A |
5383049 | Carr | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5399933 | Tsai | Mar 1995 | A |
5425763 | Stemmann | Jun 1995 | A |
5440997 | Crowley | Aug 1995 | A |
5461386 | Knebelkamp | Oct 1995 | A |
5492572 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495221 | Post | Feb 1996 | A |
5512732 | Yagnik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5570084 | Ritter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582522 | Johnson | Dec 1996 | A |
5604960 | Good | Feb 1997 | A |
5631093 | Perry et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631618 | Trumper et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633555 | Ackermann et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635889 | Stelter | Jun 1997 | A |
5637972 | Randall et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5730155 | Allen | Mar 1998 | A |
5759054 | Spadafore | Jun 1998 | A |
5788493 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5838304 | Hall | Nov 1998 | A |
5852393 | Reznik et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5935155 | Humayun et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956778 | Godoy | Sep 1999 | A |
5983406 | Meyerrose | Nov 1999 | A |
6039759 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047456 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072251 | Markle | Jun 2000 | A |
6074420 | Eaton | Jun 2000 | A |
6115849 | Meyerrose | Sep 2000 | A |
6118271 | Ely et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120283 | Cousins | Sep 2000 | A |
6142779 | Siegel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170131 | Shin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187041 | Garonzik | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205012 | Lear | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210033 | Karkos, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224374 | Mayo | May 2001 | B1 |
6234833 | Tsai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6273918 | Yuhasz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275778 | Shimada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285097 | Hazelton et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6387096 | Hyde, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6457179 | Prendergast | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467326 | Garrigus | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6535092 | Hurley et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540515 | Tanaka | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6599321 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607304 | Lake et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652278 | Honkura et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653919 | Shih-Chung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720698 | Galbraith | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747537 | Mosteller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6842332 | Rubenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847134 | Frissen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850139 | Dettmann et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862748 | Prendergast | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864773 | Perrin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913471 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927657 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6954938 | Emberty et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954968 | Sitbon | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6971147 | Halstead | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7016492 | Pan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031160 | Tillotson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033400 | Currier | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038565 | Chell | May 2006 | B1 |
7065860 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066739 | McLeish | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066778 | Kretzschmar | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101374 | Hyde, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137727 | Joseph et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7186265 | Sharkawy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224252 | Meadow, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264479 | Lee | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7276025 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7339790 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362018 | Kulogo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7381181 | Lau et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402175 | Azar | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438726 | Erb | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444683 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453341 | Hildenbrand | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7498914 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7583500 | Ligtenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7715890 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7775567 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796002 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808349 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812697 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817004 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7832897 | Ku | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837032 | Smeltzer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839246 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843297 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868721 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874856 | Schriefer et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7889037 | Cho | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903397 | McCoy | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905626 | Shantha et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8002585 | Zhou | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8099964 | Saito et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020125977 | VanZoest | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030170976 | Molla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179880 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187510 | Hyde | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003487 | Reiter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040155748 | Steingroever | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244636 | Meadow et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251759 | Hirzel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050102802 | Sitbon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196484 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231046 | Aoshima | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240263 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263549 | Scheiner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066428 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060189259 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198047 | Xue et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214756 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290451 | Prendergast et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293762 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072476 | Milan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075594 | Sadler | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103266 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138806 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070255400 | Parravicini et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080119250 | Cho et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139261 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174392 | Cho | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181804 | Tanigawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186683 | Ligtenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218299 | Arnold | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224806 | Ogden et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272868 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278668 | Prendergast et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282517 | Claro | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090021333 | Fiedler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090209173 | Arledge et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090250576 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251256 | Fullerton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254196 | Cox et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278642 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289090 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090289749 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292371 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100033280 | Bird et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100126857 | Polwart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167576 | Zhou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110026203 | Ligtenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110210636 | Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234344 | Fullerton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110248806 | Michael | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279206 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1615573 | May 2005 | CN |
2938782 | Apr 1981 | DE |
0 345 554 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 545 737 | Jun 1993 | EP |
823395 | Jan 1938 | FR |
1 495 677 | Dec 1977 | GB |
60-091011 | May 1985 | JP |
WO-0231945 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-2007081830 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2009124030 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010141324 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
BNS 33 Range, Magnetic safety sensors, Rectangular design, http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/36449.pdf, 3 pages. |
Series BNS, Compatible Series AES Safety Controllers, http://www.schmersalusa.com/safety—controllers/drawings/aes.pdf, pp. 159-175. |
Series BNS-B20, Coded-Magnet Sensorr Safety Door Handle, http://www.schmersalusa.com/catalog—pdfs/BNS—B20.pdf, 2 pages. |
Series BNS333, Coded-Magnet Sensors with Integral Safety Control Module, http://www.schmersalusa.com/machine—guarding/coded—magnet/drawings/bns333.pdf, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2009, directed to counterpart application No. PCT/US2009/002027. (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 8, 2011 issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/049410. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/036443. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 13, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/021612. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated May 14, 2009, issued in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/038925. |
Pill-soo Kim, “A future cost trends of magnetizer systems in Korea”, Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, 1996, vol. 2, Aug. 5, 1996, pp. 991-996. |
United States Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Feb. 2, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 12, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,270. |
United States Office Action, dated Mar. 9, 2012, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,280. |
United States Office Action, dated Oct. 12, 2011, issued in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/476,952. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,520 dated Sep. 28,2012. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,520 dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
Wikipedia, “Barker Code”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2, 2008, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Bitter Electromagnet”, Web article, last modified Aug. 2011, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Costas Array”, Web article, last modified Oct. 7, 2008, 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Gold Code”, Web article, last modified Jul. 27, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Golomb Ruler”, Web article, last modified Nov. 4, 2008, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Kasami Code”, Web article, last modified Jun. 11, 2008, 1 page. |
Wikipedia, “Linear feedback shift register”, Web article, last modified Nov. 11, 2008, 6 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Walsh Code”, Web article, last modified Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Atallah et al., 2004, “Design, analysis and realisation of a high-performance magnetic gear”, IEE Proc.-Electr. Power Appl., vol. 151, No. 2, Mar. 2004. |
Atallah et al., D. 2001, “A Novel High-Performance Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, p. 2844-46. |
Bassani, 2007, “Dynamic Stability of Passive Magnetic Bearings”, Nonlinear Dynamics, V. 50, p. 161-68. |
Boston Gear 221S-4, One-stage Helical Gearbox, http://www.bostongear.com/pdf/product—sections/200—series—helical.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Chau et al., 2008, “Transient Analysis of Coaxial Magnetic Gears Using Finite Element Comodeling”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103. |
Charpentier et al., 2001, “Mechanical Behavior of Axially Magnetized Permanent-Magnet Gears”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 3, May 2001, p. 1110-17. |
Choi et al., 2010, “Optimization of Magnetization Directions in a 3-D Magnetic Structure”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 46, No. 6, Jun. 2010, p. 1603-06. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Innovative Magnetics Research in Huntsville”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4m81JjZCJo. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2009, Online Video, “Non-Contact Attachment Utilizing Permanent Magnets”, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xUm25CNNgQ. |
Correlated Magnetics Research, 2010, Company Website, http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com. |
Furlani 1996, “Analysis and optimization of synchronous magnetic couplings”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, No. 8, p. 4692. |
Furlani 2000, “Analytical analysis of magnetically coupled multiple cylinders”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 33, No. 1, p. 28-33. |
Furlani 2001, “Permanent Magnet and Electromechanical Devices”, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 131-136. |
General Electric DP 2.7 Wind Turbine Gearbox, http://www.gedrivetrain.com/insideDP27.cfm, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Ha et al., 2002, “Design and Characteristic Analysis of Non-Contact Magnet Gear for Conveyor by Using Permanent Magnet”, Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 1922-27. |
Huang et al., 2008, “Development of a Magnetic Planetary Gearbox”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 3, p. 403-12. |
Jian et al., “Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With Different Topologies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 2009, p. 4526-29. |
Jian et al., 2010, “A Coaxial Magnetic Gear With Halbach Permanent-Magnet Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 25, No. 2, Jun. 2010, p. 319-28. |
Jørgensen et al., 2005, “Two dimensional model of a permanent magnet spur gear”, Conf. Record of the 2005 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, p. 261-5. |
Jørgensen et al., “The Cycloid Permanent Magnetic Gear”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 44, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2008, p. 1659-65. |
Krasil'nikov 2008, “Calculation of the Shear Force of Highly Coercive Permanent Magnets in Magnetic Systems With Consideration of Affiliation to a Certain Group Based on Residual Induction”, Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 44, No. 7-8, p. 362-65. |
Krasil'nikov 2009, “Torque Determination for a Cylindrical Magnetic Clutch”, Russian Engineering Research, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 544-47. |
Liu et al., 2009, “Design and Analysis of Interior-magnet Outer-rotor Concentric Magnetic Gears”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105. |
Lorimer et al., A., 1997, “Magnetization Pattern for Increased Coupling in Magnetic Clutches”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997. |
Mezani et al., 2006, “A high-performance axial-field magnetic gear”, Journal of Applied Physics vol. 99. |
Neugart PLE-160, One-Stage Planetary Gearbox, http://www.neugartusa.com/ple—160—gb.pdf, referenced Jun. 2010. |
Tsurumoto 1992, “Basic Analysis on Transmitted Force of Magnetic Gear Using Permanent Magnet”, IEEE Translation Journal on Magnetics in Japan, vol. 7, No. 6, Jun. 1992, p. 447-52. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US12/61938 dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
Mi, “Magnetreater/Charger Model 580” Magnetic Instruments Inc. Product specification, May 4, 2009, http://web.archive.org/web/20090504064511/http://www.maginst.com/specifications/580—magnetreater.htm, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/471,189 dated Apr. 3, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/374,074 dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/530,893 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/028095 dated May 13, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/236,413 dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/246,584 dated May 16, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,519 dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,994 dated Aug. 8, 2013. |
United States Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,219 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110273253 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61395205 | May 2010 | US |