The disclosed embodiments relate generally to satellite communications. More particularly, the disclosed embodiments relate to moving-base real-time kinematic (RTK) measurement.
Conventional real-time kinematic (RTK) techniques used in many navigation applications such as land and hydrographic surveys are based on the use of carrier phase measurement signals received from a number of satellites. The conventional RTK technique used for navigating a moving object receiver (e.g., a ship, a car, etc.) requires a stationary base receiver (often called the base station) to periodically broadcast its satellite data to the moving object receiver. The moving object receiver compares its own phase measurements with the ones received from the base station, and uses that information plus the position of the base station to determine the position of the moving object receiver. Communications between the base station and the rover receiver can take place via radio communication using allocated frequencies, typically in the UHF band.
Some embodiments provide a system, computer readable storage medium storing instructions, or a computer-implemented method for navigating a moving object according to signals from satellites. A moving object (also referred to herein as a “rover”) receives satellite navigation signals from a number of satellites and generates satellite navigation data for the moving object from the received satellite navigation signals. The moving object also receives moving base data from a moving base. The received moving base data includes satellite measurement data of the moving base. At the moving object a relative position vector (e.g., a vector that connects a position of the moving base to a position of moving object) of the moving object relative to the moving base is determined, based on the received moving base data and the received satellite navigation data. In some embodiments, the moving object reports information corresponding to the relative position vector and/or a current position of the moving object by sending a signal to a home system.
In some embodiments, both the moving base data received from the moving base and the satellite navigation data for the moving object include data for a first specific time (e.g., an epoch) prior to the current time. As described in more detail below, the relative position vector is then determined by generating an RTK value for the relative position vector for the first specific time, using the moving base data received from the moving base and the satellite navigation data for the moving object for the first specific time.
The moving-base RTK method and system described herein can be used in a wide range of applications, such as maintaining a fixed distance between two vehicles (e.g., a moving object such as a rover and a moving base such as a truck) or other mobile systems, maintaining a fixed relative position (e.g., a position difference vector in two-dimensions or three-dimensions) between two vehicles or other systems, or maintaining a fixed velocity difference between two vehicles or other systems.
Moving base 120 measures the received satellite navigation signals at the specific times and communicates those measurements (e.g., pseudorange and/or phase measurements) at certain specific times (e.g., times, t0 to tk, shown in
Moving object 110 determines its relative position with respect to moving base 120, based on (A) satellite navigation signals received by moving object 110 from satellites 115 and (B) the satellite signal measurement data received from moving base 120. The relative position determined by moving object 110 is represented by a relative position vector. In the following discussion, and throughout this document, the term “relative position vector” means the “relative position vector between moving object 110 and moving base 120, or vice versa.” It is noted that the relative position vector between moving object 110 and moving base 120 is the same as the relative position vector between moving base 120 and moving object 110, multiplied by minus one. Thus, both relative position vectors convey the same information so long as the starting point and ending point (i.e., which end of the vector at is moving base 120 and which end is at moving object 11) are known.
In some embodiments, moving object 110 is configured to generate a relative position vector for any specified time by 1) determining a relative position vector between moving object 110 and moving base 120 at predefined times or intervals (e.g., at one second intervals), herein called epoch boundary times; and 2) combining the relative position vector at a last epoch boundary time prior to the specified time with the change in position at moving object 110 and the change in position (or the estimated change in position, as explained below) at moving base 120 between the specified time and the prior epoch boundary time. This process, sometimes herein called time synchronized RTK, generates an accurate (e.g., within a few centimeters) relative position vector between moving object 110 and moving base 120 at any specified time that is between epoch boundary times (e.g., the current time, or an earlier time after the last epoch boundary time). In some implementations, a system such as moving object 110 is configured to generate updated relative position vectors at a rate that is greater than or equal to 25 Hz (e.g., an updated relative position vector is generated every 40 milliseconds when the update rate is 25 Hz, or every 20 milliseconds when the update rate is 50 Hz).
In some embodiments, moving object 110 reports a relative position vector and/or a current position of moving object 110 to home system 160. Home system 160 may be a server or a client system (e.g., a desktop, a laptop, a cell phone, a tablet, a personal digital assistant (PDA), etc.). In some embodiments, the home system is located in moving object 110 or moving base 120. Home system 160 is optionally linked to a network such as the Internet. Optionally, home system 160 is configured to control movement of moving object 110 (e.g., by controlling steering and/or propulsion systems 112 of moving object 110), or to control movement of moving base 120 (e.g., by controlling steering and/or propulsion systems 122 of moving base 120) so as maintain a predefined distance or relative position vector between moving base 120 and moving object 110.
Communication interface 206 (e.g., a receiver or transceiver) is used by moving object system 200 to receive communications from moving base 120. Communication interface 208 (e.g., a transmitter or transceiver) is used by moving object system 200 to send signals from moving object 110 to the home system 160, reporting information corresponding to the relative position vector with respect to moving base 120 and/or a current position of moving object 110. In some embodiments, communication interfaces 206 and 208 are a single transceiver, while in other embodiments they are separate transceivers or separate communication interfaces.
Memory 210 includes high-speed random access memory, such as DRAM, SRAM, DDR RAM or other random access solid state memory devices; and may include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic disk storage devices, optical disk storage devices, flash memory devices, or other non-volatile solid state storage devices. Memory 210 optionally includes one or more storage devices remotely located from the CPU(s) 202. Memory 210, or alternately the non-volatile memory device(s) within memory 210, comprises a computer readable storage medium. In some embodiments, memory 210 or the computer readable storage medium of memory 210 stores the following programs, modules and data structures, or a subset thereof:
In some implementations, determining modules 230 include an RTK module 232, a delta module 233, a forward projection module 234 and a speed smoothing module 236, as described below.
RTK module 232 determines the relative position vector at specific times (herein called epoch boundary times) using moving base data (i.e., satellite measurement data for moving base 120 at each specific time, as received from moving base 120 at times later than the specific times) and satellite signal measurements made at moving object system 200 (at moving object 110) at each specific time. The computation of the relative position vector at each specific time is performed in accordance with well known real-time-kinematics (RTK) methodologies.
Delta module 233 determines changes in position of moving object 110 (or moving object system 200) between epoch boundary times. In some embodiments, delta module 233 uses a technique known as L1 phase navigation to convert changes in phase measurements of the L1 signal into position changes of moving object 110.
Measurement module 231 processes the received satellite navigation signals to determine satellite navigation data for moving object 110 at a sequence of times, including epoch boundary times and times between the epoch boundary times. This processing involves measuring or determining measurements of the received satellite navigation signals. For example, the measurements may include a pseudorange and L1 and L2 phase measurements for each satellite from which navigation signals are received. RTK module 232 uses the moving base data and the moving object satellite navigation data for a specific time (e.g., an epoch boundary time) to generate an RTK value, which is the relative position vector for that specific time.
Optionally, in applications in which an absolute position of moving object 110 is needed, RTK module 232 determines the position (i.e., absolution position) of moving base 120 at the one or more specific times using the moving base data. Alternatively, the determining module(s) 230 receives data from moving base 120 indicating the position of moving base 120 at the one or more specific times. In these alternative implementations, moving base 120 processes the satellite navigation signals received by its satellite receiver 140 (
Speed smoothing module 236 determines a smoothed velocity of moving base 120, using two or more position-change updates of moving base 120, as discussed below in more detail with respect to
Forward projection module 234 determines a projected current relative position vector for the current time using a known change in position of moving base 120 since a specific time in the past (e.g., an epoch boundary time), the velocity of moving base 120 (e.g., the smoothed velocity of moving base 120, determined by module 236), a known change in position of moving object 110 since the same specific time in the past, and the relative position vector for that same specific time, to determine a projected current relative position vector for the current time. See equation 1 below and the related discussion.
Operating system 212 and each of the above identified modules and applications correspond to a set of instructions for performing a function described above. The set of instructions can be executed by the one or more processors 202 of moving base system 200. The above identified modules, applications or programs (i.e., sets of instructions) need not be implemented as separate software programs, procedures or modules, and thus various subsets of these modules may be combined or otherwise re-arranged in various embodiments. In some embodiments, memory 210 stores a subset of the modules and data structures identified above. Furthermore, memory 210 optionally stores additional modules and data structures not described above.
Data transmitted by moving base 120 arrives at moving object 110 at time tr, (see time scale 320) which is sufficiently later than time t0 that the transmission delay, and subsequent processing, must be taken into account in order to generate an accurate relative position vector. Stated another way, because the moving base 120 is moving, and data transmission is not instantaneous, using RTK to determine the relative position vector requires synchronizing the satellite measurement data for moving base 120 and moving object 110, and determining a current relative position vector for the current time requires projecting changes in position of the moving base 120 to the current time. These techniques for managing the timing delays while performing RTK computations is herein called time-synchronized RTK.
RTK module 232 of moving object system 200 determines an RTK value (also referred to as “an RTK solution”), which is the relative position vector between moving object 110 and moving base 120 for each epoch boundary time t0, t1 . . . tk. Determining the RTK solution at moving object 110 uses both the delayed moving base data and measurements determined from the satellite navigation signals received at moving object 110. Using this information, RTK module 232 determines an accurate relative position vector or an accurate position (e.g., within less than or equal to one or a few cm) of moving object 110 for each of the epoch boundary times.
The received time (tr) associated with the data received from moving base 120 is indicated on the time scale 320. As noted above, the time delay between t0 and tr is due to data transmission between moving base 120 and moving object 110. As a result, the time synchronized RTK process for time t0 starts at tr. However, due to computational delay, the RTK solution may not be ready until a later time tp. In other words, the RTK solution obtained at time tp actually corresponds to time t0. The satellite navigation data for moving object 110 used in determining the RTK solution for time t0 must correspond to the time t0 and not tp or tr, and thus the satellite navigation data for time t0 is buffered or stored in a local database until RTK module 232 is ready to use it. Other data transmitted from moving base 120 to moving object 110 (e.g., update data transmitted between epoch boundary times) experiences similar transmission delays, and the processing delays for each type of data will typically depend on the way in which that data is processed.
Update times t01, t02 . . . t0n (e.g., at predetermined time intervals shorter than one second, such as 20 msec intervals corresponding to 50 Hz or 40 msec intervals corresponding to 25 Hz) shown on the time scale 310, correspond to times after the first epoch boundary time t0 (and similarly after other epoch boundary times such as t1 and tk). In some embodiments, moving base 120 transmits a position update at each update time. In one example, the update information transmitted by moving base 120 for each update time indicates changes in position and time, Δx, Δy, Δz, and Δt, since the immediately preceding epoch boundary time. As explained above, the update information takes a finite amount of time to be received and processed by moving object system 200. Moving object system 200 processes the update information to determine the velocity of moving base 120.
In some embodiments, moving object 110 determines an updated relative position vector (i.e., at current time t0K) based on the RTK solution for the last epoch boundary time, such as time t0 (or t1 . . . tk). In some embodiments, moving object 110 determines the current relative position vector (e.g., at any of the update times t01, t02 . . . or t0N) by combining the RTK solution for the first specific time t0 with relative position changes from both moving base 120 and moving object 110, as represented by Equation 1 below:
RPV(t0K)=RPV(t0)+ΔposMO−ΔposMB (Eq. 1)
where, RPV(t0K) and RPV(t0) represent the relative position vectors at a current time t0K and the earlier epoch boundary time t0, respectively. The relative position changes ΔposMO and ΔposMB respectively correspond to position change of moving object 110 and moving base 120 between times t0 and t0K. The change in position of moving object 110 can be determined “directly” (e.g., using L1 successive delta phase navigation) from measurements of changes in the received satellite navigation signals, or it can be calculated (in which case it is a projected change in position) using well-known methods, based on the velocity of moving object 110 and a travel time of Δt=t0k−t0. Further, the velocity of moving object 110 can be determined from changes in position of moving object 110. Due to transmission delay, the current position of moving base 120 cannot be determined directly. Thus, the change in position of moving base 120, ΔposMB, between times t0 and t0k is calculated from two parts. The first part is the change of the moving base between the time t0 and t0i, which is can be is determined “directly” using successive delta phase measurements at the moving base and is then transmitted to the moving object via radio communication. The second part determines a projected change in position of the object base using well-known methods, based on velocity of moving base 120 and a travel time of Δt=t0k−t0i. See equation 8 below and the related discussion. The velocity of moving base 120 is determined from changes in position of moving base 120; this is discussed in more detail below.
In some implementations, when the message 400 is a message containing satellite navigation data for one satellite (e.g., sent at the beginning of an epoch), message data field 420 includes the mobile base 120 identification number (or, more generally, data identifying the mobile base), the satellite PRN number (or, more generally, data identifying the satellite) for which measurement data is being provided in the message, the time associated with the measured satellite signals (e.g., the GPS timestamp value), satellite signal resolution or quality information, a pseudorange from mobile base 120 to the satellite, and carrier phase measurements for one or more satellite signals (e.g., the L1 and L2 signals from a GPS satellite).
In some implementations, when the message 400 is a position update message (e.g., an update message sent at one of the update times t01, t02 . . . t0n), message data field 420 includes the mobile base 120 identification number, the time of the update, the delta time for the update (e.g., the amount of time between the update time and the immediate preceding epoch boundary time), delta values for X, Y and Z components of the mobile base's coordinates, number of satellites used by mobile base 120 to generate the position update data, and variance-covariance values for the X, Y and Z delta values.
In some embodiments, position update data 554 for a single position update sent by mobile base 120 includes a change in position 574; a timestamp and/or delta time value (indicating an amount of time since the most recent epoch boundary time) 572, indicating the time corresponding to the position update values 574; and optionally includes satellite information 576 (e.g., indicating the number of satellites on which the position update is based), and variance-covariance information.
In each position data record 500, the initial position PMB 510 is the position of the moving base moving base 120 at the beginning of the epoch (i.e., at a epoch boundary time) (e.g., t1 in
The position changes (e.g., (ΔPMB)11, (ΔPMB)12 . . . (ΔPMB)1N) represent changes of the position of moving base 120 corresponding to update times (e.g., update times t11, t12 . . . t1N, shown in
Moving object positions database 220 shown in
The moving object position changes ((ΔPMO)11, (ΔPMO)12 . . . (ΔPMO)1N) represent changes of the position of moving object 110 corresponding to update times (e.g., update times t11, t12 . . . t1N, shown in
In some embodiments, forward projection module 234 combines the position of moving base 120 at an epoch boundary time (e.g., t1), the relative position vector RPV(t1) for the epoch boundary time, and a change in position of moving object 110 to determine a position of the moving object 110 at a current time (e.g., an update time t1K), as represented by Equation 2 below:
PMO(t1K)=PMB(t1)+RPV(t1)+(ΔPMO)1K (Eq. 2)
where, PMO(t1k) represents position of moving object 110 at update time t1K, PMB(t1) represents the position of moving base 120 at an epoch boundary time t1, RPV(t1) indicates the relative position vector at the epoch boundary time t1, and (ΔPMO)1K is the change in position of moving object 110 between the epoch boundary time t1 and the update time t1K.
RPV(t1)=PMO(t1)−PMB(t1) (Eq. 3)
where, PMO(t1) is the position of moving object 110 at time t1, and PMB(t1) is the position of moving base 120 at time t1. Data fields 612-1 to 612-N store update values for the relative position vector corresponding to update times t11, t12 . . . t1N after the epoch boundary time t1. In some embodiments, relative position vector RPV(t11) for update time t11 is determined by moving object system 200 in accordance with Equation 4:
RPV(t11)=RPV(t1)+ΔposMO−ΔposMB (Eq. 4)
where, RPV(t1) is the initial relative position vector at the epoch boundary time t1, and ΔposMO and ΔposMB are the respective changes in positions of moving object 110 and moving base 120 between the epoch boundary time t1 and a respective update time t11.
Moving object system 200 (
Subsequently (720), moving object 110 receives, via communication channel 150 and communications receiver 206 (
The moving base data includes satellite measurement data of moving base 120 (724). The satellite measurement data is generated by moving base 120 from the satellite navigation signals is receives from a number of satellites 115 (724). Examples of the specific information included the satellite measure data received from moving base 120 are described above with reference to
In some embodiments, moving object 110 receives from moving base 120 a number of successive position change updates of moving base 120 (726). The successive position change updates correspond to a number of update times (e.g., update times t11, t12 . . . t1N after the epoch boundary time t1) after the last epoch boundary time (e.g., t1) for which satellite measurement data has been received from moving base 120. Moving object 110 receives the successive position change updates via communications channel 150 and communications receiver 206 (728), and stores them in the moving base received data database 214, as described above with respect to
Optionally, an absolute position (as opposed to a relative position) of moving base 120 is determined by determining module 230 of moving object system 200 (
Determining module 230 of moving object system 200 determines a relative position vector of moving object 110 relative to moving base 120 (740). Determining module 230 uses the satellite navigation data received from moving base 120 and satellite navigation data received from the satellites 115 to determine the relative position vector.
In some embodiments, RTK module 232 determines (744) the relative position vector by generating an RTK value for the relative position vector (i.e., sometimes called the RTK solution) for an epoch boundary time (e.g., time t0 shown in
Optionally, determining module 230 (at moving object 110) determines the position PMO(t0) of moving object 110 for an epoch boundary time (e.g., t0), based on the position PMB(t0) of moving base 120 for the epoch boundary time and the value of the relative position vector RPV(t0) at the same epoch boundary time (748), as represented by Equation 5:
PMO(t0)=PMB(t0)+RPV(t0) (Eq. 5)
In some embodiments, determining module 230 determines the position PMO(t01) of moving object 110 at the current time t0k (750), based on the position PMB(t0) of moving base 120 at the preceding epoch boundary time t0, the relative position vector for the preceding epoch boundary time t0 and the change in position of moving object 110, as represented by Equation 6:
PMO(t01)=PMB(t0)+RPV(t0)+ΔPMO(t01−t0) (Eq. 6)
where RPV(t0) represents the relative position vector for the epoch boundary time t0 and ΔPMO(t01−t0) represents the change in position of moving object 110 between the current time and the epoch boundary time.
In some embodiments, if the moving object system 200 fails to receive satellite navigation signals for any particular time at which it needs to measure those signals, for example due to the moving object system 200 moving near or under an obstruction, moving object system 200 “bridges” over the data missing period. Moving object system 200 accomplishes this by extrapolating the moving object system's position, or change in position. In particular, moving object system 200 computes a velocity VMO of moving object system 200, for example by using computations analogous to the computations described below for determining a velocity of moving base 120. Then a change in position ΔPMO of moving object system 200 for the data missing period is computed by multiplying the determined velocity VMO by the length of the data missing period Δt.
In some embodiments (752), determining module 230 determines the relative position vector RPV(t0k) for the current time t0k based on the relative position vector RPV(t0) for the epoch boundary time t0, the change in position ΔPMO(t0k−t0) of moving object 110, and a projected change in the position ΔPMB(t0k−t0) of moving base 120, which is determined based on the velocity of the moving base moving base 120, as represented by Equations 7 and 8:
RPV(t0k)=RPV(t0)+ΔPMB(t0k−t0)−ΔPMO(t0k−t0) (Eq. 7)
where ΔPMB(t0k−t0) is partially projected using the velocity of moving base 120 because current moving base 120 delta position is not available at moving object 110 due to communication delays. For example, if time t0i is the last time for which a position update has been received from moving base 120, ΔPMB(t0k−t0) may be computed as follows:
ΔPMB(t0k−t0)=ΔPMB(t0i−t0)+VMB·(t0k−t0i) (Eq. 8)
where (t0k−t0i) is the elapsed time between the current time and the last update time for which a moving base update has been received by the moving object, and VMB is the velocity of moving base 120. Stated more generally, when the moving object has received one or more updates from the moving base since the last epoch boundary time, the computation of the relative position vector for the current time takes into account (A) the change in position of the moving base from a first specific time (the last epoch boundary time) to a second specific time (the last time for which an update is received from the moving base), and (B) a projected change in position of the moving base from the second specific time to the current time. The change in position ΔPMO(t0k−t0) of moving object 110 is determined by moving object system 200 from changes in the satellite navigation signals received by satellite receiver 204 of moving object system 200.
In some embodiments, a position-propagation calculated value is determined for the relative position vector at an epoch boundary time (e.g., time t1, or more generally tJ) when a predefined criterion is satisfied (756). As discussed below, the predefined criterion corresponds a computation whose result indicates low confidence in the RTK solution. RPVPP, the position-propagated value for the relative position vector for an epoch boundary time (e.g., tJ) is determined by using RPV(t0), the relative position vector for a prior specific time (e.g., t0), ΔPMO, the change in position of moving object 110, and ΔPMB, the change in position of the moving base moving base 120, in the time interval (e.g., one second) between the current epoch boundary time (e.g., tJ) and the prior epoch boundary time (e.g., t0), as represented by Equation 9:
RPVPP=RPV(t0)+ΔPMB−ΔPMO (Eq. 9)
Furthermore, when the predefined criterion is met, the determining module 230 determines the relative position vector for epoch boundary time tJ by combining the RTK value for the relative position vector with the position-propagation calculated value for the relative position vector (i.e., RPVPP), as represented by Equation 10:
RPV=RPVRTX+RRTK·(RRTK+RPP)−1·(RPVPP−RPVRTK) (Eq. 10)
where RRTK and RPP represent the variance-covariance matrices for the RTK solution (i.e., RPVRTK) and the position-propagated value (i.e., RPVPP), respectively. In some embodiments, when the predetermined criteria is not met, the relative position vector for an epoch boundary time is defined by the RTK solution (i.e., RPVRTK). Equation 10 represents a weighted sum of the RTK value and the position-propagation calculated value for the relative position vector. In this weighted sum, the factor RRTK·(RRTK+RPP)−1 in Equation 10 is the weight assigned to the position-propagation calculated value for the relative position vector and 1−RRTK·(RRTK+RPP)−1 is the weight assigned to the RTK value for the relative position vector.
In some embodiments, the predefined criterion is based on attributes of the variance-covariance matrices for the RTK solution and the position-propagated value (758). For instance, the criterion may be considered met, when the sum of the diagonal elements in the RRTK matrix is larger than the sum of the diagonal elements in the RPP matrix.
In some embodiments, the determining module 230 can determine RPV(t1), an updated relative position vector for an update time at an epoch boundary time (e.g., t1) based on one or more position-change updates, such as ΔPMB(t0j) received from moving base 120 (e.g., at an update time t0J of update times t01, t02 . . . t0N shown in
RPV(t1)=RPV(t0J)−ΔPMB+ΔPMO (Eq. 11)
where, RPV(t0J) is the relative position vector determined for the update time t0J (based on ΔPMB(t0j) and the change in position of moving base 120 between update time t0J and the preceding epoch boundary time t0), ΔPMO is the change in position of moving object 110 between time t1 and the update time t0J, and ΔPMB is defined in terms of ΔPMB(t0j), as represented by Equation 12:
ΔPMB=(ΔPMB(t0j))·(t1−t0J)/(t0J−t0) (Eq. 12)
In some embodiments, the determining module 230 determines the velocity of moving base 120 based on two or more position changes of moving base 120 received from moving base 120 (762), as represented by Equation 13:
VMB=(ΔPMB(tJ−t0)−ΔPMB(tJ-1−t0))/(tJ−tJ-1) (Eq. 13)
where, ΔPMB(tJ−t0) and ΔPMB(tJ-1−t0) are the respective position changes of moving base 120 received at moving object 110 for update times t1 and tJ-1 relative to an epoch boundary time t0. In some embodiments, the update times tJ and tJ-1 are two of the specific times after the epoch boundary time t0.
Since the velocity of moving base 120 used, for example, in Equation 8 may be quite noisy, in some embodiments speed smoothing module 236 (
where VMBS(tJ) is the smoothed velocity of moving base 120 for time tJ, VMBS(tJ-1) is the smoothed velocity of moving base 120 for a previous time tJ-1, VMB(tJ) is the unsmoothed velocity (e.g., determined using Equation 13) of moving base 120 for time tJ, and c is a smoothing constant. Smoothing constant c is typically between 2 and 10, and more generally it is between 2 and 50. In some embodiments, the value of the smoothing constant c depends on the observed dynamics of the moving base velocity changes and can be any number larger than one.
In some embodiments, the determining module 230 determines PMB(t01), the projected position of moving base 120 at the current time t01 based on PMB(t0), the position of moving base 120 at the epoch boundary specific time t0 and the velocity VMB, of moving base 120 (as determined in accordance with equation 13 or 14) (766), as represented by Equation 15:
PMB(t01)=PMB(t0)+VMB·(t01−t0) (Eq. 15)
where (t01−t0) is the elapsed time between the current time and the epoch boundary time.
Moving object system 200 (
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/369,596, filed Jul. 30, 2010, “System and Method for Moving-Base RTK Measurements,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5148179 | Allison | Sep 1992 | A |
5311154 | Hirota | May 1994 | A |
5359332 | Allison et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5477458 | Loomis | Dec 1995 | A |
5512905 | Nichols et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519620 | Talbot et al. | May 1996 | A |
5557524 | Maki | Sep 1996 | A |
5646630 | Sheynblat et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5757314 | Gounon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5841026 | Kirk et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850341 | Fournier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5899957 | Loomis | May 1999 | A |
5935194 | Talbot et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6040798 | Kinal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6100842 | Dreier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127968 | Lu | Oct 2000 | A |
6342853 | Kalafus et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6469663 | Whitehead et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6531981 | Fuller et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6753810 | Yang et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792380 | Toda | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6985104 | Large et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7043364 | Scherzinger | May 2006 | B2 |
7212155 | Hatch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7242211 | Whetsel | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7298319 | Han et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7427950 | Eslinger et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7511661 | Hatch et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7656352 | Alban et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663539 | Han et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7679555 | Dai et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7855678 | Scherzinger et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7991362 | Lane et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20050024263 | Sharpe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050110676 | Heppe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151683 | Sharpe et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050248485 | Hatch et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017611 | Hatch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070085737 | Eslinger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080309550 | Sairo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090189805 | Sauriol | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110037647 | Tajima et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120029810 | Dai et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130234885 | Geier et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101048671 | Oct 2007 | CN |
0609935 | Aug 1994 | EP |
1580570 | Sep 2005 | EP |
204457 | Jul 2006 | EP |
09061509 | Mar 1997 | JP |
WO 2005114250 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2008035139 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008150389 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009130570 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009136254 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010074777 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Report on overseas travel”, Sep. 2003, Portland, Oregon, ION 2003 Reports.doc, specifically p. 12, “bullet” item 5. |
Bona, P., “Precision, Cross Correlation, and Time Correlation of GPS Phase and Code Observations,” GPS Solutions, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 3-13 (2000). |
Crawford, S., et al., “Performance Evaluation of Sensor Combinations on Mobile Robots for Automated Platoon Control,” ION GNSS 17th Int'l Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, Sep. 21-24, 2004, Long Beach, California, pp. 706717. |
Hatch, R., “Instantaneous Ambiguity Resolution,” presented at KIS Symposium 1990, Banff, Canada, Sep. 11, 1990. |
Hatch, R., “The Synergism of GPS Code and Carrier Measurements,” Magnavox Government and Industrial Electronics Company, Jan. 1982. |
Hwang, P.Y., et al., “Enhanced Differential GPS Carrier-Smoothed Code Processing Using Dual Frequency Measurements,” Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation (ION) GPS, Sep. 18, 1998, pp. 461-470. |
Hwang, P.Y.C., “Kinematic GPS for Differential Positioning: Resolving Integer Ambiguities on the Fly,” Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-15, Spring 1991. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/002514, dated Aug. 22, 2007. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2005/015836, dated Nov. 21, 2005. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/042374, dated Jun. 1, 2005. |
Keenan, C.R., et al., “Using the Information from Reference Station Networks: A Novel Approach Conforming to RTCM V2.3 and Future V3.0,” IEEE 2002 Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Palm Springs, CA, Apr. 15-18, 2002, pp. 320-322. |
Sharpe, Tenny, et al., “Exploiting the Synergies between RTK and Wide Area dGPS Systems”, presentation from the Institute of Navigation, 16th International Technical Meeting, Portland, Oregon, Sep. 2003. |
Walsh, D., “Real Time Ambiguity Resolution While on the Move,” Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation GPS-92, Washington, DC, Sep. 18, 1992, pp. 473-481. |
Yang, Y., “Tightly Integrated Attitude Determination Methods for Low-Cost Inertial Navigation: Two-Antenna GPS and GPS/Magnetometer,” Dissertation submitted to University of California, Riverside, Jun. 2001. |
Navcom Technology, Inc., International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/038841, mailed Sep. 14, 2011, 12 pages. |
NavCom Tehnology, Inc., 1st Office Action, CN201180047278.9, Jul. 2, 2014, 16 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120029810 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61369596 | Jul 2010 | US |