Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANET; e.g., “mesh networks”) are known in the art as quickly deployable, self-configuring wireless networks with no pre-defined network topology. Each communications node within a MANET is presumed to be able to move freely. Additionally, each communications node within a MANET may be required to forward (relay) data packet traffic. Data packet routing and delivery within a MANET may depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the number of communications nodes within the network, communications node proximity and mobility, power requirements, network bandwidth, user traffic requirements, timing requirements, and the like.
MANETs face many challenges due to the limited network awareness inherent in such highly dynamic, low-infrastructure communication systems. Given the broad ranges in variable spaces, the challenges lie in making good decisions based on such limited information. For example, in static networks with fixed topologies, protocols can propagate information throughout the network to determine the network structure, but in dynamic topologies this information quickly becomes stale and must be periodically refreshed. It has been suggested that directional systems are the future of MANETs, but this future has not as yet been realized. In addition to topology factors, fast-moving platforms (e.g., communications nodes moving relative to each other) experience a frequency Doppler shift (e.g., offset) due to the relative radial velocity between each set of nodes. This frequency Doppler shift complicates the tradeoffs with respect to, e.g., sensitivity, response time, and/or resource utilization that must be made for reception processing. Further, clock frequency errors also contribute to net signal frequency offsets such that determining relative velocity based on signal frequency shift is not always straightforward.
A receiving (Rx) communications node of a multi-node communications network is disclosed. In embodiments, the Rx node includes a communications interface and antenna elements. The Rx node includes a controller for monitoring a transmitting (Tx) node of the network. The Tx node scans through a range or set of Doppler nulling angles (e.g., nulling directions) according to a Doppler nulling protocol, adjusting its transmit frequency to resolve at each nulling angle a Doppler frequency offset associated with the relative motion (e.g., including a velocity vector and angular direction) between the Tx and Rx nodes. Based on the net frequency shift detected by the Rx node at each Doppler nulling angle, the Rx node determines frequency shift points (FSP), corresponding to each nulling angle and to the associated net frequency shift, the set of FSPs indicative of a magnitude of the relative radial velocity between the Tx and Rx nodes.
In some embodiments, the magnitude of the relative radial velocity includes a maximum and minimum radial velocity between the Tx and Rx nodes, e.g., a relative maximum/minimum for the range of nulling angles or the absolute maximum/minimum for all possible nulling angles.
In some embodiments, the set of Doppler nulling angles (and hence the set of FSPs) includes at least three elements.
In some embodiments, the set of Doppler nulling angles is known to the Rx node, and the controller additionally generates frequency shift profiles by plotting the set of FSPs over the set of Doppler nulling angles. The controller further determines, based on the frequency shift profiles, additional parameters such as the directional component of the relative radial velocity vector and the angular direction of the Tx node relative to the Rx node.
In some embodiments, the additional parameters include a phase offset of the frequency shift profile.
In some embodiments, the angular direction includes a clock frequency offset between the Tx and Rx nodes, which the Rx node determines based on additional information received from the Tx node.
In some embodiments, the relative radial velocity vector is based in a platform inertial reference frame specific to the Rx node (e.g., a vector of the Tx node's movement relative to the Rx node). The Rx node may convert the relative radial velocity vector to a global inertial reference frame, e.g., to account for the motion of both the Tx and Rx nodes relative to the earth.
In some embodiments, the Rx node measures a time differential associated with each identified signal, e.g., a time differential in the measurement of one or more cycles of the received signal, the time differential corresponding to the Doppler frequency offset at the corresponding Doppler nulling angle.
In a further aspect, a method for direction and relative velocity determination between transmitting (Tx) and receiving (Rx) nodes in a multi-node communications network is also disclosed. In embodiments, the method includes identifying, via the Rx node, signals transmitted by a Tx node moving relative to the Rx node (e.g., according to a velocity vector and angular direction) and scanning through a range or set of Doppler nulling angles (e.g., nulling directions). Each signal may correspond to an adjustment of the transmitting frequency (e.g., corresponding to a net frequency shift detected by the Rx node) at a particular nulling direction to resolve the Doppler frequency offset associated with the motion of the Tx node relative to the Rx node. The method includes determining, based on the set of identified signals and corresponding set of net frequency shifts, a set of frequency shift points (FSP), each FSP corresponding to a particular nulling direction, to the net frequency shift at that direction, and to a radial velocity of the Tx node relative to the Rx node. The method includes determining, based on the set of FSPs, a magnitude of the radial velocity vector between the Tx and Rx nodes.
In some embodiments, the method includes determining a maximum and minimum relative velocity between the Tx and Rx nodes (e.g., which may be absolute or relative maxima and minima).
In some embodiments, the set of nulling angles is known to the Rx node, and the method includes mapping the set of FSPs to the set of nulling angles to generate frequency shift profiles. Based on the frequency shift profiles, the Rx node determines a directional component of the relative radial velocity vector and the angular direction associated with the motion of the Tx node relative to the Rx node.
In some embodiments, the method includes identifying a phase offset of the frequency shift profile.
In some embodiments, the method includes determining a clock frequency offset between the Tx and Rx nodes, the clock frequency offset incorporated into the angular direction and determined based on additional parameters received from the Tx node (e.g., via shifting scanning and monitoring roles between the Tx and Rx nodes).
In some embodiments, the method includes converting the relative radial velocity vector from a platform inertial reference frame specific to the Rx node to a global reference frame.
In some embodiments, the method includes measuring a time differential associated with each identified signal, e.g., a time differential in the measurement of one or more cycles of the received signal, the time differential corresponding to the Doppler frequency offset at the corresponding Doppler nulling angle.
This Summary is provided solely as an introduction to subject matter that is fully described in the Detailed Description and Drawings. The Summary should not be considered to describe essential features nor be used to determine the scope of the Claims. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing Summary and the following Detailed Description are example and explanatory only and are not necessarily restrictive of the subject matter claimed.
The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. The use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items. Various embodiments or examples (“examples”) of the present disclosure are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale. In general, operations of disclosed processes may be performed in an arbitrary order, unless otherwise provided in the claims. In the drawings:
and
Before explaining one or more embodiments of the disclosure in detail, it is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited in their application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components or steps or methodologies set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. In the following detailed description of embodiments, numerous specific details may be set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the instant disclosure that the embodiments disclosed herein may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known features may not be described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the instant disclosure.
As used herein a letter following a reference numeral is intended to reference an embodiment of the feature or element that may be similar, but not necessarily identical, to a previously described element or feature bearing the same reference numeral (e.g., 1, 1a, 1b). Such shorthand notations are used for purposes of convenience only and should not be construed to limit the disclosure in any way unless expressly stated to the contrary.
Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
In addition, use of “a” or “an” may be employed to describe elements and components of embodiments disclosed herein. This is done merely for convenience and “a” and “an” are intended to include “one” or “at least one,” and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
Finally, as used herein any reference to “one embodiment” or “some embodiments” means that a particular element, feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment disclosed herein. The appearances of the phrase “in some embodiments” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, and embodiments may include one or more of the features expressly described or inherently present herein, or any combination or sub-combination of two or more such features, along with any other features which may not necessarily be expressly described or inherently present in the instant disclosure.
Broadly speaking, embodiments of the inventive concepts disclosed herein are directed to a system and method for determining relative velocity vectors, directions, and clock frequency offsets between mutually dynamic communication nodes of a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) or similar multi-node communications network. For example, via the use of omnidirectional antennas for Doppler null scanning (or, in some embodiments, directional antennas that require directional tracking via spatial scanning), directional topologies of neighbor nodes in highly dynamic network environments may be determined. Further, if Doppler null scanning knowledge is common to all nodes, receiving nodes may tune to the appropriate Doppler frequency shift to maintain full coherent sensitivity.
Referring to
In embodiments, the multi-node communications network 100 may include any multi-node communications network known in the art. For example, the multi-node communications network 100 may include a mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) in which the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 (as well as every other communications node within the multi-node communications network) is able to move freely and independently. Similarly, the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 may include any communications node known in the art which may be communicatively coupled. In this regard, the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 may include any communications node known in the art for transmitting/transceiving data packets. For example, the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 may include, but are not limited to, radios, mobile phones, smart phones, tablets, smart watches, laptops, and the like. In embodiments, the Rx node 104 of the multi-node communications network 100 may each include, but are not limited to, a respective controller 106 (e.g., control processor), memory 108, communication interface 110, and antenna elements 112. (In embodiments, all attributes, capabilities, etc. of the Rx node 104 described below may similarly apply to the Tx node 102, and to any other communication node of the multi-node communication network 100.)
In embodiments, the controller 106 provides processing functionality for at least the Rx node 104 and can include any number of processors, micro-controllers, circuitry, field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other processing systems, and resident or external memory for storing data, executable code, and other information accessed or generated by the Rx node 104. The controller 106 can execute one or more software programs embodied in a non-transitory computer readable medium (e.g., memory 108) that implement techniques described herein. The controller 106 is not limited by the materials from which it is formed or the processing mechanisms employed therein and, as such, can be implemented via semiconductor(s) and/or transistors (e.g., using electronic integrated circuit (IC) components), and so forth.
In embodiments, the memory 108 can be an example of tangible, computer-readable storage medium that provides storage functionality to store various data and/or program code associated with operation of the Rx node 104 and/or controller 106, such as software programs and/or code segments, or other data to instruct the controller 106, and possibly other components of the Rx node 104, to perform the functionality described herein. Thus, the memory 108 can store data, such as a program of instructions for operating the Rx node 104, including its components (e.g., controller 106, communication interface 110, antenna elements 112, etc.), and so forth. It should be noted that while a single memory 108 is described, a wide variety of types and combinations of memory (e.g., tangible, non-transitory memory) can be employed. The memory 108 can be integral with the controller 106, can comprise stand-alone memory, or can be a combination of both. Some examples of the memory 108 can include removable and non-removable memory components, such as random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), flash memory (e.g., a secure digital (SD) memory card, a mini-SD memory card, and/or a micro-SD memory card), solid-state drive (SSD) memory, magnetic memory, optical memory, universal serial bus (USB) memory devices, hard disk memory, external memory, and so forth.
In embodiments, the communication interface 110 can be operatively configured to communicate with components of the Rx node 104. For example, the communication interface 110 can be configured to retrieve data from the controller 106 or other devices (e.g., the Tx node 102 and/or other nodes), transmit data for storage in the memory 108, retrieve data from storage in the memory, and so forth. The communication interface 110 can also be communicatively coupled with the controller 106 to facilitate data transfer between components of the Rx node 104 and the controller 106. It should be noted that while the communication interface 110 is described as a component of the Rx node 104, one or more components of the communication interface 110 can be implemented as external components communicatively coupled to the Rx node 104 via a wired and/or wireless connection. The Rx node 104 can also include and/or connect to one or more input/output (I/O) devices. In embodiments, the communication interface 110 includes or is coupled to a transmitter, receiver, transceiver, physical connection interface, or any combination thereof.
It is contemplated herein that the communication interface 110 of the Rx node 104 may be configured to communicatively couple to additional communication interfaces 110 of additional communications nodes (e.g., the Tx node 102) of the multi-node communications network 100 using any wireless communication techniques known in the art including, but not limited to, GSM, GPRS, CDMA, EV-DO, EDGE, WiMAX, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, 5G, WiFi protocols, RF, LoRa, and the like.
In embodiments, the antenna elements 112 may include directional or omnidirectional antenna elements capable of being steered or otherwise directed (e.g., via the communications interface 110) for spatial scanning in a full 360-degree arc (114) relative to the Rx node 104.
In embodiments, the Tx node 102 and Rx node 104 may both be moving in an arbitrary direction at an arbitrary speed, and may similarly be moving relative to each other. For example, the Tx node 102 may be moving relative to the Rx node 104 according to a velocity vector 116, at a relative velocity VTx and a relative angular direction (an angle α relative to an arbitrary direction 118 (e.g., due east); θ may be the angular direction of the Rx node relative to due east.
In embodiments, the Tx node 102 may implement a Doppler nulling protocol. For example, the Tx node 102 may adjust its transmit frequency to counter the Doppler frequency offset such that there is no net frequency offset (e.g., “Doppler null”) in a Doppler nulling direction 120 (e.g., at an angle ϕ relative to the arbitrary direction 118). The transmitting waveform (e.g., the communications interface 110 of the Tx node 102) may be informed by the platform (e.g., the controller 106) of its velocity vector and orientation (e.g., a, VT) and may adjust its transmitting frequency to remove the Doppler frequency shift at each Doppler nulling direction 120 and angle ϕ.
In embodiments, even if the Doppler nulling protocol is not known to the Rx node 104, the Rx node may observe (e.g., monitor, measure) the net frequency offset as the Tx node 102 covers (e.g., steers to, orients to, directs antenna elements 112 to) a range of Doppler nulling directions 120 (e.g., relative to the arbitrary direction 118, each Doppler nulling direction 120 having a corresponding Doppler nulling angle ϕ). Accordingly, the Rx node 104 may determine the magnitude of the parameter A of the velocity vector {right arrow over (V′T )} of the Tx node 102, to the degree that the Tx node covers both extremes (e.g., achieves both a minimum and a maximum velocity relative to the Rx node) such that
where f is the transmitting frequency of the Tx node and c is the speed of light. For example, each frequency shift point (FSP) detected by the Rx node 104 at a given Doppler nulling direction 120 may correspond to a velocity vector of the Tx node 102 relative to the Rx node. As noted above, and as described in greater detail below, the magnitude parameter A may incorporate a maximum and minimum relative velocity. If, however, the range of Doppler nulling angles ϕ is insufficiently broad, the magnitude parameter A may only include relative maxima and minima for that limited range of Doppler nulling angles (e.g., as opposed to the full 360 degrees of possible Doppler nulling angles; see, for example,
In some embodiments, the Doppler nulling protocol and set of Doppler nulling directions 120 (and corresponding angles ϕ) may be known to the Rx node 104 and common to all other nodes of the multi-node communications network 100. For example, the Tx node 102 may perform the Doppler nulling protocol by pointing a Doppler null in each Doppler nulling direction 120 and angle ϕ of the set or range of directions as described above. The Rx node 104 may monitor the Tx node 102 as the Doppler nulling protocol is performed and may therefore determine, and resolve, the net Doppler frequency shift for each Doppler nulling direction 120 and angle ϕ.
In embodiments, although both the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 may be moving relative to the arbitrary direction 118, monitoring of the Doppler nulling protocol by the Rx node 104 may be performed and presented in the inertial reference frame of the Rx node 104 (e.g., in terms of the movement of the Tx node 102 relative to the Rx node 104) to eliminate the need for additional vector variables corresponding to the Rx node. For example, the velocity vector of the Tx node 102 in a global reference frame may be shifted according to the velocity vector of the Rx node 104, e.g.:
{right arrow over (V′T)}={right arrow over (VT)}−{right arrow over (VR)}
where {right arrow over (V′T)} is the velocity vector of the Tx node in the inertial reference frame of the Rx node and {right arrow over (VT)}, {right arrow over (VR)} are respectively the velocity vectors of the Tx node and the Rx node in the Earth reference frame. In embodiments, either or both of the Tx node 102 and Rx node 104 may accordingly compensate for their own velocity vectors relative to the Earth and convert any relevant velocity vectors and relative velocity distributions into a global reference frame, e.g., for distribution throughout the multi-node communications network 100. In addition, while the representation of the relative motion between the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 is here presented in two dimensions, the relative motion (and, e.g., any associated velocity vectors, angular directions, Doppler nulling directions, and other parameters) may be presented in three dimensions with the addition of vertical/z-axis components.
Referring now to
In embodiments, the Rx node 104 may repeat the net Doppler frequency shift determination and resolution process for multiple Doppler nulling directions 120 and angles ϕ of the Tx node 102 (e.g., chosen at random or according to predetermined or preprogrammed protocol). For example, the Tx node 102 may scan through at least three Doppler nulling directions (202a-c,
In embodiments, the amplitude of the frequency shift profile 206 may correspond to the velocity of the Tx node 102 relative to the Rx node 104. For example, even if the Doppler nulling protocol is not known to the Rx node 104, a magnitude parameter A of the velocity vector {right arrow over (V′T)} of the Tx node 102 (e.g., in the reference frame of the Rx node) may still be determined, e.g., between a minimum relative velocity 208 (e.g., 0 m/s) and a maximum relative velocity 210 (e.g., 3000 m/s, or consistent with Tx and Rx nodes traveling in opposing directions (α=180°, consistent with a Tx node traveling due west (212) and the phase-offset frequency shift profile 214).
In embodiments, as a varies the frequency shift profiles 214, 216, 218 may present as phase-offset versions of the frequency shift profile 206 (e.g., with similarly offset maximum and minimum relative velocities). For example (in addition to the frequency shift profile 214 noted above), the frequency shift profile 216 may correspond to α=90°, consistent with a Tx node traveling due north (220) and the frequency shift profile 218 may correspond to α=−90°, consistent with a Tx node traveling due south (222).
In embodiments, the frequency shift profiles 206, 214, 216, 218 may allow the Rx node 104 to derive parameters in addition to the magnitude parameter A of the velocity vector {right arrow over (V′T)} of the Tx node 102. For example, the true Doppler frequency shift due to the relative radial velocity between the Tx and Rx nodes 102, 104 may be, as seen by the Rx node:
and the Tx node 102 may, per the Doppler nulling protocol, adjust the transmitting frequency f due to its velocity projection at the Doppler nulling angle ϕ such that:
and the net Doppler frequency shift, also accounting for clock frequency offset Δfclock, may therefore be:
assuming, for example, that the velocity vector and direction change slowly relative to periodic measurements of Δfnet. It should be noted that Δfnet as presented above represents a net frequency offset from nominal incorporating f/C (compare, e.g.,
Δfnet=A cos(φ+B)+C
where the constant parameters A, B, and C may be determined via at least three measurements of a Doppler nulling angle ϕ. As noted above,
while also
where, as noted above, A may correspond to the magnitude of the velocity vector of the Tx node 102 relative to the Rx node 104. Similarly, B may correspond to the directional component α of the velocity vector and C to the angular direction θ of the Rx node 104.
In embodiments, once the parameters A, B, and C are determined, the parameters α, V′T, θ, may be derived therefrom as can be seen above. For example, when the clock frequency offset Δfclock is zero it is straightforward to derive θ from C above. However, when the clock frequency offset Δfclock is nonzero, the Rx node 104 may determine Δfclock by exchanging information with the Tx node 102. For example, the Rx and Tx nodes 104, 102 may switch roles: the Rx node 104 may perform the Doppler nulling protocol for various Doppler nulling directions 120 and angles ϕ while the Tx node 102 monitors the Doppler nulling protocol to resolve the net Doppler frequency shift for θ′=θ+π (and Δf′clock=−Δfclock). The Tx node 102 may share this information with the Rx node 104, which may merge information from both directions to determine θ and Δfclock.
Referring now to
In embodiments, the frequency profiles (302, 304, 306, 308;
In some embodiments, the Rx node 104, 104a-c may assess and determine Doppler effects due to the relative motion of the Tx node 102 by measuring time differential points (TDP) rather than FSPs. For example, a signal transmitted at 1 kHz by the Tx node 102 may be subject to 10 Hz of Doppler frequency shift. This one-percent (1%) change in frequency may be alternatively expressed as a differential of one percent in the time required to measure a cycle of the transmitted signal (or, e.g., any arbitrary number of cycles). The Doppler effect may be precisely and equivalently characterized in either the frequency domain or the time domain. For example, the graphs 200, 300 of
In some embodiments, due to the nature of the transmitted signal (or, e.g., other conditions) it may be easier or more advantageous for the Rx node 104 to determine the Doppler shift in the time domain rather than in the frequency domain. For example, when the signal transmitted by the Tx node 102 at a given Doppler nulling direction (202a-c,
Referring now to
At a step 402, a receiving (Rx) node of the multi-node communications network monitors a transmitting (Tx) node of the network to identify signals transmitted by the Tx node through a range of Doppler nulling angles (e.g., or a set of discrete Doppler nulling angles), the signals including adjustments to the transmitting frequency to counter Doppler frequency offset at each Doppler nulling angle. For example, the Tx node may be moving relative to the Rx node according to a velocity vector and an angular direction. Each identified signal may correspond to a particular Tx frequency adjustment (e.g., a net frequency shift detected by the Rx node) at a particular Doppler nulling angle to resolve a Doppler frequency offset at that angle.
At a step 404, a controller of the Rx node determines, based on the monitoring and identified signals, a set (e.g., three or more) of frequency shift points (FSP), where each FSP corresponds to a net frequency shift of the signal. For example, each FSP may correspond to the Tx node (e.g., aware of its velocity vector and platform orientation) scanning in a Doppler nulling direction and adjusting its transmit frequency to resolve the Doppler offset at the corresponding Doppler nulling angle ϕ according to a nulling protocol, resulting in the net frequency shift detected by the Rx node. In some embodiments, the Rx node measures the net frequency shift in the time domain rather than in the frequency domain. For example, the Rx node may measure a time differential associated with a received cycle or cycles of the identified signal, the time differential corresponding to the net frequency shift at the corresponding Doppler nulling angle.
At a step 406, the controller determines, based on the plurality of frequency shift points, a magnitude of the relative velocity vector between the Tx and Rx nodes (e.g., in the reference frame of the Rx node). For example, from the magnitude of the velocity can be derived a maximum and minimum relative velocity with respect to the range of Doppler nulling angles ϕ.
In some embodiments, the range or set of Doppler nulling angles ϕ may be known to all nodes of the multi-node communications network (e.g., including the Rx node) and the method 400 may include the additional steps 408 and 410.
At the step 408, the Rx node maps the determined FSPs to a frequency shift profile corresponding to a distribution (e.g., a sinusoidal curve) of the ϕ-dependent net frequency shift over all possible Doppler nulling angles ϕ. In some embodiments, the controller further determines a phase offset of the frequency shift profile.
At the step 410, the controller determines, based on the frequency shift profile, a velocity V′T and a directional component α of the velocity vector (e.g., of the Tx node 102 relative to an arbitrary direction) and the angular direction θ (e.g., of the Rx node relative to the arbitrary direction).
Referring also to
Referring now to
It is to be understood that embodiments of the methods disclosed herein may include one or more of the steps described herein. Further, such steps may be carried out in any desired order and two or more of the steps may be carried out simultaneously with one another. Two or more of the steps disclosed herein may be combined in a single step, and in some embodiments, one or more of the steps may be carried out as two or more sub-steps. Further, other steps or sub-steps may be carried in addition to, or as substitutes to one or more of the steps disclosed herein.
Although inventive concepts have been described with reference to the embodiments illustrated in the attached drawing figures, equivalents may be employed and substitutions made herein without departing from the scope of the claims. Components illustrated and described herein are merely examples of a system/device and components that may be used to implement embodiments of the inventive concepts and may be replaced with other devices and components without departing from the scope of the claims. Furthermore, any dimensions, degrees, and/or numerical ranges provided herein are to be understood as non-limiting examples unless otherwise specified in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4134113 | Powell | Jan 1979 | A |
4399531 | Grande et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4806934 | Magoon | Feb 1989 | A |
5835482 | Allen | Nov 1998 | A |
5898902 | Tuzov | Apr 1999 | A |
6072425 | Vopat | Jun 2000 | A |
6115394 | Balachandran et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6195403 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6496940 | Horst et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6662229 | Passman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6721290 | Kondylis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744740 | Chen | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6845091 | Ogier et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7023818 | Elliott | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7171476 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7242671 | Li et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7299013 | Rotta et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7417948 | Sjöblom | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7558575 | Losh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573835 | Sahinoglu et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7633921 | Thubert et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7698463 | Ogier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7719989 | Yau | May 2010 | B2 |
7729240 | Crane et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7787450 | Chan et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7881229 | Weinstein et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903662 | Cohn | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7983239 | Weinstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8036224 | Axelsson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8159954 | Larsson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8218550 | Axelsson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8223660 | Allan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8341289 | Hellhake et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8490175 | Barton et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8553560 | Axelsson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8630291 | Shaffer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8717230 | Fischi et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8717935 | Lindem, III et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732338 | Hutchison et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8798034 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824444 | Berenberg et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8867427 | Taori et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8913543 | Zainaldin | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942197 | Rudnick et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8964739 | Wisehart | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9179475 | Koleszar et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9246795 | Madaiah et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9294159 | Duerksen | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9304198 | Doerry et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9325513 | Liu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9435884 | Inoue | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9516513 | Saegrov et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9544162 | Vasseur et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9628285 | Császár | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9713061 | Ruiz et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9858822 | Gentry | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9979635 | Hellhake et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10097469 | Hui et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10098051 | Mosko et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10205654 | Choi et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10257655 | Cody | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10382897 | Lanes et al. | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10455521 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10484837 | Navalekar et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10531500 | Ulinskas | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10601684 | Hashmi et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10601713 | Turgeman et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10609622 | Bader et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10785672 | Kwan et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10798053 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10873429 | Kwon et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
10931570 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2021 | B1 |
10965584 | Kwon et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10979348 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
10993201 | Luecke | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10999778 | Kwon et al. | May 2021 | B1 |
11071039 | Fallon et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11082324 | Ramanathan et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11129078 | Yates et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11290942 | Kwon et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11528675 | Nagaraja et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
20020018448 | Amis et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030151513 | Herrmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040028016 | Billhartz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040213239 | Lin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040246902 | Weinstein et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060010170 | Lashley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056421 | Zaki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070097880 | Rajsic | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109979 | Fu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070223497 | Elson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070299950 | Kulkarni | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080107034 | Jetcheva et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117904 | Radha et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080219204 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273582 | Gaal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291945 | Luo | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310325 | Yang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090086713 | Luo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090290572 | Gonia et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100074101 | Skalecki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074141 | Nguyen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110006913 | Chen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013487 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110188378 | Collins et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110312279 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120092208 | LeMire et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130006834 | Waelbroeck et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130069834 | Duerksen | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130100942 | Rudnick et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130195017 | Jamadagni et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250808 | Hui et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140017196 | Han et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018097 | Goldstein | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140188990 | Fulks | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229519 | Dietrich et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236483 | Beaurepaire et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258201 | Finlow-Bates | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010153 | Robertson | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150222479 | Kim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150296335 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326689 | Leppänen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160139241 | Holz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150465 | Jung et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160189381 | Rhoads | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160373997 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170111266 | Ko | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134227 | Song et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149658 | Rimhagen et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180013665 | Ko et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180098263 | Luo et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180146489 | Jin et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180234336 | Schumm et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180302807 | Chen et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180317226 | Sakoda | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190098625 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190222302 | Lin et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190251848 | Sivanesan et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190317207 | Schroder et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349172 | Zhang | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200011968 | Hammes et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200052997 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200092949 | Donepudi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200196309 | Amouris | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200236607 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200396708 | Bharadwaj et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210083917 | Konishi et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210153097 | Du et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210201044 | Herdade et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20220086818 | Nam et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220094634 | Kwon et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220143428 | Goetz et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220198351 | Beaurepaire et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20230057666 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101330448 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101465793 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101330448 | Dec 2010 | CN |
101465793 | Feb 2011 | CN |
101686179 | Jan 2013 | CN |
103067286 | Jun 2016 | CN |
107645417 | Jan 2018 | CN |
110234147 | Sep 2019 | CN |
102010010935 | Sep 2011 | DE |
0908022 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1912392 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2743726 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2743726 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2466964 | Dec 2017 | EP |
3026961 | Aug 2020 | EP |
2542491 | Mar 2017 | GB |
2568122 | Nov 2019 | GB |
4290684 | Jul 2009 | JP |
5164157 | Mar 2013 | JP |
1020040107702 | Dec 2004 | KR |
100568976 | Apr 2006 | KR |
1020060078814 | Jul 2006 | KR |
1020160071964 | Jun 2016 | KR |
2008157609 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2012062091 | May 2012 | WO |
2012165938 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2015114077 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015143604 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2017101575 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2018077864 | May 2018 | WO |
2019045767 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2020165627 | Aug 2020 | WO |
2021251902 | Dec 2021 | WO |
2022221429 | Oct 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 17/408,156, filed Aug. 20, 2021, Tj T. Kwon. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/534,061, filed Nov. 23, 2021, William B. Sorsby. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,920, filed Jul. 5, 2022, Eric J. Loren. |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/344,445, filed May 20, 2022, Eric J. Loren. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/369,398, filed Mar. 29, 2019, Kwon. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,107, filed Apr. 16, 2022, Loren et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/541,703, filed Dec. 3, 2021, Kwon et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,920, filed Jul. 5, 2022, Loren et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/233,107, filed Apr. 16, 2021, Eric J. Loren. |
Martorella, M. et al., Ground Moving Target Imaging via SDAP-ISAR Processing: Review and New Trends. Sensors 2021, 21, 2391. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072391. |
Yi et al., “Passive Clustering in Ad Hoc Networks (PC)”, URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yi-manet-pc-00, Nov. 14, 2001, 31 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European Application No. 21188737.7 dated Dec. 10, 2021, 8 pages. |
Seddigh et al., “Dominating sets and neighbor elimination-based broadcasting algorithms in wireless networks”, IEE Transactions in Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE, USA, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2002 (Jan. 1, 2002), pp. 14-25, XP011094090, ISSN: 1045-9219, DOI 10.1109/71.9800214. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,671, filed Aug. 7, 2021, Kwon et al. |
Kwon et al., “Efficient Flooding with Passive Clustering (PC) in Ad Hoc Networks”, Computer Communication Review. 32. 44-56. 10.1145/510726.510730, Aug. 11, 2003, 13 pages. |
Yi et al., “Passive Clustering in Ad Hoc Networks (PC)”, URL: https://tools.ietf,org/html/drafts-yi-manet-pc-00, Nov. 14, 2001, 31 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220334211 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |