This invention relates generally to the API platform field, and more specifically to a new and useful system and method for offering a multi-partner delegated platform in the API platform field.
Business to developer based companies have found ways to market developer-focused products. Developer platforms that provide services and resources through an application programming interface (API) are widely used by developers and companies building other products. Such developer API platforms require considerable resources and operational commitment to create and maintain. API platforms however can sometimes be limited in the audiences they can target. There are often partners willing to offer the same service, but building the infrastructure is often technically challenging, a long process, and costly. Further, users of a potential partner will often have an established relationship with the partner and introducing a new party may be potentially confusing or disruptive to the provided service. Thus, there is a need in the API platform field to create a new and useful system and method for offering a multi-partner delegated platform. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
1. System for Provisioning a Platform
As shown in
The service platform 110 functions to provide basic service functionality. The service platform can provide any suitable service. Preferably, the service platform no includes a public API 140 that facilitates some programmatic service, such as telephony application platform, data processing service, payment service, resource hosting platform, security service, analytics service, mapping service, and/or any suitable programmatic service or platform. In many cases, the platform no provides offerings that require considerable investment in infrastructure, maintenance, development, or other factors, and in particular the offerings are aligned with industry of other key players that can act as partners. In these cases, it may not be feasible to offer the platform 110 as a whitelisted service since there may be an economy of scale or efficiencies or other benefits to having a single platform. In a preferred variation, the service platform no is a telephony/communication application platform such as the one described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,630, filed 2 Apr. 2009, titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING TELEPHONY SESSIONS”, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by this reference. A telephony or communication based platform can provide routing, communication based application execution, communication analytics, multi-modal communication bridging, programmatic control of communications, and/or other suitable telephony or communication features. In one variation, a communication service platform 110 can offer application interaction for various modes of communication including PSTN telephony, SIP voice communication, voice IP client communication, video communication, screen-sharing, multimedia synchronous communication, text messages (e.g., SMS messaging and IP-based client messaging), media messaging (e.g., MMS messaging and IP-based client messaging), asynchronous messaging, and/or any suitable form of communication. Such an exemplary service platform 110 can be suitable for integration with large telecommunications company partners. For example, phone company ABC may want to offer its subscribers/customers the option of using particular features offered by the platform; phone company ABC can transparently delegate the features of the platform to the service provider no. In this document, the telephony application service platform may be used for exemplary explanation but any suitable service platform may alternatively be used.
The service platform no preferably includes account constructs, where platform usage requires authenticating as a user and then accessing or using resources of the service platform. The service platform no is preferably a multi-tenant platform where there is a plurality of accounts on the service platform no. Some of these can be accounts scoped to or under a partner account, but some accounts can be independently maintained by the service platform provider as shown in
The partner services API 120 functions to interface with a partner service platform 150. The partner services API 120 preferably enables partner record and account configuration. A partner services API 120 preferably uses a partner authentication token to authenticate a partner. Through the API a partner can preferably create accounts, suspend accounts, purchase apps, change settings of an account, access usage of an account, or perform any configuration with the service platform no. A partner can be any suitable entity. Typically, a partner will be a company in a related market to the service platform. For example a telephone carrier may act as a partner in the example where the service platform is a telephony application platform. The partner may alternatively be any suitable entity. A partner will typically programmatically use the partner services API 120 according to user interactions with a partner application or platform. The partner typically handles acquiring users/customers, and users will establish or will have pre-existing account relationships with the partner. The partner will additionally manage the user relationship such as handling billing, customer support, communication, and any other aspects of the relationship. A user will typically interface predominantly with the partner and may even be unaware of the use of the underlying service platform. For example, a user will go to a website of a partner, create an account with the partner, and pay any billing fees to the partner. The partner will transparently use the partner service API 120 to create an account for the user within the partner record on the service platform and pay bills of an account to the service platform 110. The platform API is preferably a subset of API features of an internal service platform API 120. Within a service platform there can be numerous interactions that are achieved through internal APIs. Some of these interactions such as billing and management of accounts may not be exposed to general users as it relates more to operational features rather than the service offered by the platform, however some of these interactions may be opened to partners through the platform API. All or a subset of service level functionality can be provided by the service platform through the partner. The partner API can additionally be restricted, limited, or filtered to only known machine addresses associated with the partner. For example, a set or block of IP addresses may be configured for partner API access for a particular partner. Partner API requests of a partner not from the configured IP addresses may be disregarded or blocked.
In some alternative embodiments, the system can additionally include partner service platforms 150, which function to provide the user facing functionality. The partner service platform 150 as described above is preferably a computing application, platform, service, or infrastructure system with networking capability to interface with an outside service platform. A partner service platform 150 can be a telecommunications service, a payment service, a resource-hosting platform, a security service, an analytics service, a mapping service, and/or any suitable programmatic service or platform. The partner service platform 150 preferably stores a partner key that is used to in communicating verified authentication requests on behalf of users. The partner service platform 150 can include an internal account system, which is preferably separate and distinct from an account system of the service platform and possibly other partner service platforms 150. The partner service platform 150 can stores an association between an account of the partner service platform and the account identifier used to identify a partner user account in the service platform. The partner service platform 150 is preferably additionally configured to follow the authentication steps to authenticate on behalf of a partner user account, and further configured to embed an account portal as desired.
The account portal 130 functions to provide users access to account features of a service platform no. An account portal 130 is preferably a service platform configuration interface. Typically the interface is a webpage, but may alternatively be application views. On an exemplary telephony application platform, an account portal 130 may allow a user to view call analytics, configure telephony number applications, purchase and remove telephony endpoints, view account tokens, and/or perform any suitable user account related interactions. The account portal 130 is preferably embeddable within a partner portal. A partner portal will typically include the account portal by using an iframe and authenticating account portal access as a partner account. The partner can use the partner key to authenticate as a partner account on behalf of a user of the partner. In this arrangement, the account portal functions to provide a configured user interface within the webpage or application of the partner. The account portal 130 may alternatively be embedded by dynamically constructing the account portal view (e.g., using a JavaScript to construct the account portal within the webpage of the partner portal.). The account portal may additionally include a customization module that can dynamically customize the account portal interface and interactions according to partner record settings. The customization module functions to allow a partner to tailor the presentation and capabilities of the account portal. In one example, a carrier partner may want to limit purchasable telephone endpoints to telephone numbers owned by the carrier. In another example, the partner may want to set the presentation of the interface to stylistically match the partner portal—the graphical styling, logos, and layout can be adjusted according to partner settings. Additionally, the partner portal can be augmented to integrate resources of the partner. Links in the interface can reference resources of the partner and/or content can be pulled or embedded within the account portal 130. For example, the partner may provide a customer support system, which can be used as an alternative to the customer support page of the account portal 130.
The public API 140 of the service platform functions to provide API access to the service platform no. The public API 140 is preferably used by partner accounts in a manner substantially similar to how the public API is used by regular accounts of the service platform. Service platform restrictions of a partner account may be enforced that limit, enable, or modify particular API requests made through the public API 140. The public API 140 may additionally include a redirection API. API calls are typically communicated to a URI resource. In directing the API calls to the service platform URI, the presence of the service platform will be exposed to a user of a partner. The redirection API is preferably a mirror of the service platform API but using a domain associated with the partner. API calls to the partner redirection API are preferably automatically redirected to the public API of the service platform. In one variation, a CNAME DNS record can be modified to redirect API requests addressed to a partner themed resource identifier.
2. Method for Provisioning a Platform
As shown in
Block S110, which includes configuring a partner key on a service platform for a partner record, functions to setup a partner for managing partner services. A service platform preferably creates a partner record within account data records. A partner record can be initially created when entering a partner relationship with an outside entity (i.e., a partner). A partner is preferably a trusted entity, and permission to become a partner may be accompanied by various enrollment processes. While multiple partners can be serviced simultaneously through this method, self-enrollment may not be enabled. Creation of a partner record can be created within the service platform through an administrator interface of the service platform and API request or through any suitable interface. The partner record preferably stores configuration settings of the partner and also accounts of the partner. The partner record is any suitable form of data model to represent settings of a partner and association between the partner and accounts under the partner control. The method can additionally include configuring customization of the service platform scoped to the partner account S112. In one variation, some parameters can be set with permissions to be controlled by the partner, such as by using the partner services API, and some parameters can be secured for service platform administrator control. Partner controlled customization parameters can be templating configuration (e.g., visual templating of the account portal), overriding service platform resources (e.g., accessing database records of the partner instead of the service provider), overriding interaction flow (e.g., linking to partner customer support instead of customer support of the service platform), and/or any suitable setting visible to the partner as shown in
A partner key is preferably stored in connection with a particular partner record. The partner key is preferably an authentication key that can be used to authenticate the partner when interfacing with the service platform through the API. The partner key is preferably a shared secret cryptographic key, and is also known by the partner. The partner key can be generated by the service platform and shared with the partner. Alternatively, the partner key can be configured and synchronized between the service platform and the respective partner in any suitable manner. The partner key is preferably used along with a partner service API to authenticate partner service level API requests as described below. The partner key can be used to verify the identity of particular requests as originating from the partner. As the partner is a trusted entity, the partner can be granted privilege to vouch for a user and impersonate the user when interacting with an account of the user. The partner service API may be used to interface with a partner account such as by creating a user account, deleting a user account, updating a user account, configuring partner customizations, and/or performing any suitable partner action. The partner record can additionally include a parameter defining restricted access to the partner service API. A set of IP addresses can be set that defines a white listed set of IPs that can be allowed to access the partner service API through.
Block S120, which includes creating accounts scoped within the partner record, functions to create partner accounts associated with the partner. Accounts within a partner record are records that are controlled and administered by a partner. A partner typically will acquire a new user through a partner website, service, or other component of partner system. The partner can manage any suitable user account information that is relevant to the partner on a system operated by the partner, but the partner preferably additionally creates a partner user account on the service platform for the new user through the partner service API. For example, a partner may have an existing user for which they have a user account and related allocated resources. At some point, this existing user, which exists within the account system of the partner system, may be upgraded or enable the capability to use the service platform. The service platform operates with its own account system, and accordingly needs an account object to use in connection with the user of the partner. However, the partner may want to avoid the user from maintaining a separate and different user account—the partner can programmatically create a partner user account through the partner services API where the partner user account is associated with the user. The user may be unaware of the second account within the service platform and may never create a special username and password to access that second account.
An API request to create a new user is preferably authenticated using the partner key. If the authentication validates the partner key then a new account can be created associated with the partner record. If the request is found to be invalid, the request is preferably denied. Any suitable approach may be used to authenticate partner level API requests. Any number of accounts may be created associated with the partner record. Additionally, creating accounts may include account customization. Account customization may be globally applied to all accounts of a partner or may alternatively or additionally be applied to a specific subset of accounts of a partner record. Account customizations may include platform restrictions. Certain features of a platform may be disallowed (or alternatively enabled) for an account. In the telephony application platform example, an account may be prevented from performing SMS messaging. In another example, particular API calls may be allowed, disallowed, or otherwise restricted for a particular account. Account customizations may alternatively include usage limits (e.g., amount of usage). The accounts of a partner record are preferably scoped to remain secure and inaccessible from outside accounts (e.g., other partner accounts).
Block S130, which includes authenticating an account for access to a service platform account portal, functions to allow a user to access a service portal through a partner portal. A partner will typically have a user portal or account page, from which the user can manage a service apparently provided by the partner. In reality, the user is managing a service accessed through a partner but provided by a service platform. An account is preferably authenticated by authenticating a request by the partner. In one embodiment, a partner signs an authentication request including the account ID to authenticate. The request is preferably signed with the partner key. The service platform preferably verifies that the request is signed by the partner and that the account ID is a valid account associated with the partner record. The authentication process can rely upon the trusted partner relationship.
In one specific implementation shown in
A partner may be enabled to authenticate any account associated with a partner record. For example, a user authenticates against an account system of the partner, and if the authentication is verified at the partner, the partner programmatically vouches for the user and uses the partner key to authenticate user login with the service platform. Such authentication can be synchronous to and responsive to user directions and interactions. The authentication process may additionally find application to other fields such as enabling an impersonation authentication process. In other variations, the authentication of user made by the platform can be asynchronous to user interactions. This may be used in various situations such as allowing administrators or IT departments to login as a user to troubleshoot a problem without requiring the user to login using account credentials or performing a background process automatically on behalf of the users.
Authentication can additionally include other alternatives and variations. As one additional variation, partner authentication can include additional factors of authentication, and more specifically a trusted device can be used as a second factor of authentication. During user registration, a second factor authentication device identifier can be specified, which the service platform or a third party service can use to verify user intent to access the service platform. In an alternative embodiment, the partner can create and store generated user credentials, and the generated user credentials are then used to authenticate users accessing the service platform.
Block S140, which includes rendering an embeddable account portal as an account of the partner, functions to include an account portal interface within an interface of the partner. An account portal is preferably rendered when a user is attempting to access the administration tools or user interface tools for the functionality provided by the service platform provider. This can be included as a subset of the administration user interface tools offered by the partner. The account portal is preferably rendered specifically for the authenticated account. Account information, settings, application or data access, and other account level access are preferably provided through the account portal. Since the user of the account may only have knowledge of the partner entity, the account portal may be embedded within a portal of a partner (e.g., website or application interface). The account portal is preferably embedded as an iframe on the partner portal. The account portal may alternatively be embedded by building an interface from a script. For example, JavaScript may authenticate access to a portal as an account of the partner, and then the DOM objects are programmatically constructed to present the account portal. The account portal may alternatively be embedded using any suitable technique. The partner portal is typically hosted on any suitable server or application of the partner. The account portal is preferably hosted or provided by the service platform. In the telephony application example, an account portal may be used for configuring application URI's for telephony numbers, purchasing communication endpoints, viewing analytics and logs, setting billing information, and/or any suitable account level settings of a telephony application. The partner portal, which embeds the account portal can provide additional partner level services. For example, if the partner is a telecom company, the user may be able to manage their phone, internet, and/or other telecommunications contracts—by navigating to a telecommunications applications section in the partner portal the user can access the embedded account portal provided by the service platform. While the account portal is preferably a single object embedded in a single portion, multiple account portal components can be used and embedded in various portions of the partner portal. For example, a billing account portal widget can be embedded on a billing page of the partner portal alongside other partner related billing; a usage account portal widget can be embedded on a usage page of the partner alongside usage within other features of the partner service; and a configuration account portal can be presented within a page specific for the platform service.
Rendering an embeddable account portal may additionally include rendering a customized embeddable account portal. One customization option includes feature customization of the portal. Similar to the account customization, a portal can have features disabled or enabled. Certain features may not be rendered based on the partner or the partner account. In one example, a partner may be a particular telephony carrier. The telephony carrier may only want to sell telephone numbers form a telephone inventory belonging to that telephony carrier. Thus, the portal embedded by the telephone carrier preferably only has options to buy telephone numbers that belong to that telephone carrier. Customizing the account portal can include retrieving partner resources and integrating the partner resources into the account portal, which functions to embed dynamic information, application logic, or other resources into the account portal. In the example above, the telephone inventory of a partner may be communicated to the service platform through a standardized interface to customize the experience of the account portal as shown in
Additionally, the method may include accessing public API as a partner account S150. Accounts of a partner are preferably provided the same authentication tools used by other accounts of the service platform. An account of a partner is preferably given an account secure identifier (SID) and an authentication token. The account secure identifier and an authentication token and any additional security tokens or credentials can be communicated through the account portal or other suitable mechanisms. The SID and authentication token may be used by an account to use API resources provided from the service platform. A library or software development kit (SDK) may be provided to facilitate making use of an API. Providing access to the public API enables for programmatic integration of an account with the service platform as opposed to just the account portal. API requests may be communicated directly to the service provider. The presence of the service provider may alternatively be kept transparent. API requests may be sent to resources in a namespace of the partner, but transparently routed or redirected to resources of the service platform. As an API redirection example, instead of sending REST API requests to a standard URI of the service platform, the REST API request can be sent to a URI seemingly hosted by the partner, but that is redirected to the same resource destination of the standard URI of the service platform. As with the customization of the account portal, the API offerings can be similarly customized. Some requests may be set to not be allowed for partner accounts a user account created by a partner can have customized permissions with the REST API.
3. Method for Using a Delegated Service Platform
As shown in
Block S210, which includes receiving a partner key, functions to transfer a shared cryptographic token between the partner platform and the service platform. The partner key can be transferred to the partner platform in any suitable manner. In one variation, the partner key is transferred in an IP communication. In another variation, the partner key can be configured through an administrator interface or through any suitable interface. The partner key is preferably shared between the partner platform and the service platform. The partner platform preferably stores the partner key in any suitable location for us when acting on behalf of the users. Additionally, the method can include configuring the partner platform for partner services API of the service platform, which can include setting designated machines and/or ports for accessing the service platform.
Block S220, which includes selecting a user of the partner platform to add service platform functionality, functions to initiate the use of the service platform with a user. A user preferably creates an account with the partner platform or has can have an existing account. According to suitable business logic, the partner platform will determine when and which users should be enrolled in the service platform. In one variation, all users of a partner platform are enrolled. Accordingly each user can be selected and individually added to the service platform. New users can be selected to be added when they create an account on the partner platform. In another variation, the service platform may only be enabled if a user of the partner platform enables the service. For example, a user can select an option in a partner portal to begin use of the service platform, at which time, the user is preferably selected to be added. In another variation, only users with particular permissions (e.g., users with a particular service plan tier) may have the service platform enabled.
Block S230, which includes requesting creation of a service platform account through a partner API, functions to communicate with the service platform to initialize a user for use with the service platform. The request is preferably transmitted from the partner platform or system to the service platform or logged in any suitable manner. The service platform account is an account that exists separate from the user account in the partner platform, but a one-to-one relationship preferably exists between platform accounts (on the service platform) and user accounts in the partner platform. The request is preferably transmitted over a partner service API in a manner substantially similar to block S120. The request is preferably cryptographically secured using the partner key or any suitable authentication mechanism.
Block S240, which includes authenticating a service platform session on behalf of the user using the partner key, functions to authenticate a user accessing the service platform. Block S240 preferably includes receiving a user request to access a service platform account portal. The account portal preferably requires a session to be authenticated as some partner account. The partner platform preferably signs a request using the partner key on behalf of the user to establish the session authenticated as the user. The user preferably does not have to provide credentials to the service platform—the user can sign in to the partner platform using a set of authentication credentials (which can be unknown and irrelevant to the service platform) and then in response to user being successfully logged in, the partner platform can vouch for that user. The authentication is preferably substantially similar to that described above. The partner platform assembles account information that can identify the identity of the partner and the identity of the account. The partner key is used to create a digital signature of the account information payload, and then the digital signature and the account payload are transferred to the service platform to be authenticated.
Block S250, which includes directing the user to an account portal, functions to enable user access to the service platform. In a preferred embodiment, the account portal is embedded within a portal of the partner (i.e., the partner portal). The partner portal can embed the account portal as an iframe. The account portal may alternatively be embedded by building an interface from a script included or retrieved in the partner portal. For example, JavaScript may authenticate access to a portal as an account of the partner, and then the DOM objects are programmatically constructed to present the account portal. As described above, the account portal can alternatively be embedded in a partner portal as one or more widgets. Additionally, cross portal messaging can be applied to integrate the interactions of the partner portal with the interactions in the account portal. In an alternative embodiment with less embedded integration, the partner portal redirects the user to an account portal distinct from the partner portal. In a browser, this can be reflected through the differing domain names between the partner portal and the account portal. Through partner configuration, the account portal can be customized, and actions and links in the account portal can be configured to link back to the partner platform.
In use the method enables a service platform to act as a delegate platform to one or more partners, wherein at least a subset of users interface through a partner system. The partner can authenticate a user account, which is preferably applied towards service platform access (e.g., account portal access). More specifically, the method can function to provision service platform functionality to a partner. In other words, an embodiment of the method may allow a partner to rebrand, “grey” label, or delegate functionality to an underlying service platform. The service platform can allow the partner to manage all customer-facing interactions, while the service platform provides the underlying service functionality and/or infrastructure. Preferably, the interface between services of the service platform and the partner system are substantially seamless. In one preferred implementation, the service platform is transparent and appears to be a first-party offering of the partner system. In another implementation, the transitioning between the partner system and the service platform is enhanced or automatically bridged to simplify the experience for users. The method is preferably implemented by a system substantially similar to the one described above but any suitable system may alternatively be used. Preferably, the method is implemented by service platform provider, where the platform includes a public API that facilitates some service, such as telephony applications, data processing service, payment service, resource hosting, security service, analytics service, mapping service, and/or any suitable programmatic service. In a preferred variation, the service platform is a telephony/communication application platform such as the one described above. But the method may be used in any suitable application of authentication and/or service platform provisioning.
The system and method of the preferred embodiment and variations thereof can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions are preferably executed by computer-executable components preferably integrated with the system and one or more portions of the service platform. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer-readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component is preferably a general or application specific processor, but any suitable dedicated hardware or hardware/firmware combination device can alternatively or additionally execute the instructions.
Although omitted for conciseness, the preferred embodiments include every combination and permutation of the various components of the system and method.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/752,123, filed on 14 Jan. 2013, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5274700 | Gechter et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5526416 | Dezonno et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5581608 | Jreij et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5598457 | Foladare et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5934181 | Adamczewski | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6026440 | Shrader et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6094681 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6138143 | Gigliotti et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6185565 | Meubus et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192123 | Grunsted et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206564 | Adamczewski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6232979 | Shochet | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6317137 | Rosasco | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6373836 | Deryugin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6425012 | Trovato et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426995 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430175 | Echols et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434528 | Sanders | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6445776 | Shank et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459913 | Cloutier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496500 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6501832 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507875 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6577721 | Vainio et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6600736 | Ball et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606596 | Zirngibl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6614783 | Sonesh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6625258 | Ram et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6625576 | Kochanski et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6704785 | Koo et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6707889 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711249 | Weissman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6738738 | Henton | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6757365 | Bogard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6765997 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6768788 | Langseth et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6778653 | Kallas et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788768 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792086 | Saylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792093 | Barak et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798867 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6807529 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6819667 | Brusilovsky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6820260 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829334 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6834265 | Balasuriya | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6836537 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873952 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6874084 | Dobner et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6885737 | Gao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895084 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6898567 | Balasuriya | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6912581 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6922411 | Taylor | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6931405 | El-Shimi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937699 | Schuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6940953 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6941268 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947988 | Saleh | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6964012 | Zirngibl et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6970915 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6977992 | Zirngibl et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6985862 | Stroem et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999576 | Sacra | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7003464 | Ferrans et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006606 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7010586 | Allavarpu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7039165 | Saylor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7062709 | Cheung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076037 | Gonen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076428 | Anastasakos et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089310 | Ellerman et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103003 | Brueckheimer et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103171 | Annadata et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7106844 | Holland | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7111163 | Haney | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7140004 | Kunins et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7197331 | Anastasakos et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197461 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197462 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197544 | Wang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7225232 | Elberse | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227849 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7260208 | Cavalcanti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266181 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7269557 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272564 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7277851 | Henton | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7283515 | Fowler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7286521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7287248 | Adeeb | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7289453 | Riedel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7296739 | Mo et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7298732 | Cho | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7308085 | Weissman | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308408 | Stifelman et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7324633 | Gao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7324942 | Mahowald et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7328263 | Sadjadi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330463 | Bradd et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330890 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349714 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7369865 | Gabriel et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373660 | Guichard et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376223 | Taylor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376586 | Partovi et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376733 | Connelly et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376740 | Porter et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7412525 | Cafarella et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7428302 | Zirngibl et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7440898 | Eberle et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7447299 | Partovi et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7457397 | Saylor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7473872 | Takimoto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7486780 | Zirngibl et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496054 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7500249 | Kampe et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7505951 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519359 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7522711 | Stein et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7536454 | Balasuriya | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7552054 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7571226 | Partovi et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7613287 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7623648 | Oppenheim et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7630900 | Strom | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7631310 | Henzinger | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7644000 | Strom | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7657433 | Chang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7657434 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7668157 | Weintraub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672295 | Andhare et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7675857 | Chesson | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7676221 | Roundtree et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7715547 | Ibbotson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7779065 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7875836 | Imura et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882253 | Pardo-Castellote et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7920866 | Bosch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926099 | Chakravarty et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7936867 | Hill et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7962644 | Ezerzer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7979555 | Rothstein et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8023425 | Raleigh | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8069096 | Ballaro et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8081958 | Soederstrom et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8103725 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8126128 | Hicks, III et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8149716 | Ramanathan et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8150918 | Edelman et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8156213 | Deng et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8185619 | Maiocco | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8233611 | Zettner | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8243889 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8295272 | Boni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8306021 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8326805 | Arous et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8346630 | McKeown | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8355394 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8417817 | Jacobs | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8429827 | Wetzel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8438315 | Tao et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8462670 | Chien et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8509068 | Begall et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8532686 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8542805 | Agranovsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8594626 | Woodson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8611338 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8649268 | Lawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8667056 | Proulx et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8675493 | Buddhikot et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8755376 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8806024 | Francis et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8837465 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8838707 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9014664 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9015702 | Bhat | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 20010038624 | Greenberg | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043684 | Guedalia et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006124 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020006125 | Josse et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020006193 | Rodenbusch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067823 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077833 | Arons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126813 | Partovi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136391 | Armstrong | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165957 | Devoe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176378 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030006137 | Wei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014665 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026426 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046366 | Pardikar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051037 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058884 | Kallner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059020 | Meyerson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061317 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061404 | Atwal et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103620 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123640 | Roelle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195990 | Greenblat | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196076 | Zabarski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211842 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040011690 | Marfino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044953 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052349 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071275 | Bowater et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101122 | Da Palma et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102182 | Reith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165569 | Sweatman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172482 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205689 | Ellens et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213400 | Golitsin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218748 | Fisher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040228469 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005200 | Matena et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010483 | Ling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021626 | Prajapat et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025303 | Hostetler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038772 | Colrain | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043952 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047579 | Salame | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091572 | Gavrilescu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125251 | Berger et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128961 | Miloslavsky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135578 | Ress et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177635 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181835 | Lau et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238153 | Chevalier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240659 | Taylor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243977 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246176 | Creamer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289222 | Sahim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008073 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015467 | Morken et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067506 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129638 | Deakin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168334 | Potti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203979 | Jennings | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209695 | Archer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215824 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217823 | Hussey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217978 | Mitby et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222166 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256816 | Yarlagadda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262915 | Marascio et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285489 | Francisco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002744 | Mewhinney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036143 | Alt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050306 | McQueen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070070906 | Thakur | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070070980 | Phelps et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071223 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074174 | Thornton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121651 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127691 | Lert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127703 | Siminoff | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130260 | Weintraub et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133771 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149166 | Turcotte et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153711 | Dykas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167170 | Fitchett et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192629 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208862 | Fox et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232284 | Mason et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242626 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265073 | Novi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286180 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291905 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293200 | Roundtree et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070295803 | Levine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005275 | Overton et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080025320 | Bangalore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037715 | Prozeniuk et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037746 | Dufrene et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040484 | Yardley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052395 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091843 | Kulkarni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101571 | Harlow et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104348 | Kabzinski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080134049 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139166 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146268 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152101 | Griggs | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154601 | Stifelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155029 | Helbling et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162482 | Ahern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165708 | Moore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177883 | Hanai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209050 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222656 | Lyman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232574 | Baluja et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235230 | Maes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256224 | Kaji et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080275741 | Loeffen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310599 | Purnadi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313318 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316931 | Qiu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317222 | Griggs et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317232 | Couse et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317233 | Rey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090046838 | Andreasson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052437 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090052641 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063502 | Coimbatore | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074159 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075684 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083155 | Tudor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089165 | Sweeney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089699 | Saha et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093250 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125608 | Werth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129573 | Gavan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090136011 | Goel | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170496 | Bourque | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171659 | Pearce et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171669 | Engelsma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171752 | Galvin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182896 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090217293 | Wolber et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220057 | Waters | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221310 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222341 | Belwadi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225748 | Taylor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225763 | Forsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232289 | Drucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235349 | Lai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090252159 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288165 | Qiu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300194 | Ogasawara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316687 | Kruppa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318112 | Vasten | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100037204 | Lin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070424 | Monk | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082513 | Liu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087215 | Gu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088187 | Courtney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088698 | Krishnamurthy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115041 | Hawkins et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150139 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167689 | Sepehri-Nik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188979 | Thubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191915 | Spencer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100208881 | Kawamura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217837 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217982 | Brown et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232594 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235539 | Carter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251329 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251340 | Martin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281108 | Cohen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291910 | Sanding et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110029882 | Jaisinghani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053555 | Cai et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078278 | Cui et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110081008 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083179 | Lawson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093516 | Geng et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110096673 | Stevenson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110366 | Moore et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131293 | Mori | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167172 | Roach et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110170505 | Rajasekar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176537 | Lawson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211679 | Mezhibovsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251921 | Kassaei et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110253693 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255675 | Jasper et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265172 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267985 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274111 | Narasappa et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276892 | Jensen-Horne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110280390 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283259 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289126 | Aikas et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110299672 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110310902 | Xu | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320449 | Gudlavenkatasiva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320550 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120000903 | Baarman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011274 | Moreman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120017222 | May | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028602 | Lisi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036574 | Heithcock et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120039202 | Song | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079066 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083266 | VanSwol et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110564 | Ran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114112 | Rauschenberger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149404 | Beattie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120173610 | Bleau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120174095 | Natchadalingam et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179907 | Byrd | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180021 | Byrd | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180029 | Hill | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198004 | Watte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120201238 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120208495 | Lawson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226579 | Ha et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239757 | Firstenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120254828 | Aiylam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281536 | Gell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120288082 | Segall | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290706 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304245 | Lawson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304275 | Ji et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316809 | Egolf et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321070 | Smith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130029629 | Lindholm et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031158 | Salsburg | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047232 | Tuchman | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054684 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058262 | Parreira | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067448 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097298 | Ting | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130156024 | Burg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130179942 | Caplis | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130201909 | Bosch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204786 | Mattes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130212603 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244632 | Spence et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140064467 | Lawson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140105372 | Nowack et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106704 | Cooke et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123187 | Reisman | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129363 | Lorah et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153565 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185490 | Holm et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254600 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140274086 | Boerjesson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282473 | Saraf et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140355600 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150004932 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150004933 | Kim et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150023251 | Giakoumelis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150181631 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1684587 | Mar 1971 | DE |
| 0282126 | Sep 1988 | EP |
| 1464418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1522922 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1770586 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 2134107 | Sep 1999 | ES |
| 10294788 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2004166000 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004220118 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2006319914 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 9732448 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| 02087804 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 2006037492 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2009018489 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009124223 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2010037064 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010040010 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010101935 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2011091085 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| NPL, “API Monetization Platform”, 2013. |
| Complaint for Patent Infringement, Telinit Technologies, LLC v. Twilio Inc., dated Oct. 12, 2012. |
| RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax; T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter; Jan. 2005; The Internet Society. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140201083 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61752123 | Jan 2013 | US |